0% found this document useful (0 votes)
382 views4 pages

Productivity Ratings

Construction site: Stanford University Medical Center. Construction activity observed: Casting of floor slab. Three types of ratings were calculated based on observations of the construction crew: field rating, productivity rating, and five minute rating. Field rating averaged 43.64% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 28.42% to 58.86%. Productivity rating averaged 37.8% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 20.68% to 54.92%. Five minute rating averaged 34.72% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 30.79% to 38.65%.

Uploaded by

Neetesh Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
382 views4 pages

Productivity Ratings

Construction site: Stanford University Medical Center. Construction activity observed: Casting of floor slab. Three types of ratings were calculated based on observations of the construction crew: field rating, productivity rating, and five minute rating. Field rating averaged 43.64% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 28.42% to 58.86%. Productivity rating averaged 37.8% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 20.68% to 54.92%. Five minute rating averaged 34.72% with a 95.5% confidence interval of 30.79% to 38.65%.

Uploaded by

Neetesh Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Homework-2 CEE 420 (Activity Sampling)

Neetesh Sharma, [email protected]


February 18, 2015
Construction site: Stanford University Medical Center.
Construction Activity: Casting of floor slab.
Observation mode: Webcam view 3

Field Rating

Date Observed: February 9th 2015


Time Observed: 01:00 to 2:00 PM

S
No.
1
2
3
4
5

Random No.
Rand()
0.442248965
0.071334915
0.645474302
0.076619212
0.099010323

Value Only
Sorted
0.022998432
0.22347695
0.451330144
0.560805079
0.639346566

Random
minute
1.379905918
13.40861701
27.07980861
33.64830473
38.36079395

Time
1:01 PM
1:13 PM
1:27 PM
1:33 PM
1:38 PM

Total
Labor
11
11
11
11
11

Working
Labor
6
5
4
4
5

Field
Rating
54.55
45.45
36.36
36.36
45.45

54.55 + 45.45 + 36.36 + 36.36 + 45.45


Average field Rating=
= 43.64%
5
v n
uP
u (xi x)
t
Standard Deviation = l=1
= 7.61
n1

Productivity Rating

Date Observed: February 9th 2015


Time Observed: 02:00 to 3:00 PM

S
No.
1
2
3
4
5

Random No.
Rand()
0.751932414
0.979626892
0.037534772
0.669783608
0.867202084

Effective
Workers
4
3
5
3
3

Value Only
Sorted
0.026216247
0.411785172
0.545757475
0.868728379
0.90031218

Contributory
Workers
2
2
2
2
1

Labor Utilization Factor =


k = 0.25

Random
minute
1.572974804
24.70711032
32.74544852
52.12370273
54.01873082

Idle
Workers
5
6
4
6
7

Total
Workers
11
11
11
11
11

Time
2:01 PM
2:24 PM
2:32 PM
2:52 PM
2:54 PM

LUF
0.40909
0.31818
0.5
0.31818
0.29545

Effective Workers + k ContributoryWorkers


;
Total workers

0.409 + 0.318 + 0.5 + 0.318 + 0.295


Average Productivity Rating=
= 0.378
5
v n
uP
u (xi x)2
t
Standard Deviation = l=1
= 0.0856
n1

Five Minute Rating

Date Observed: February 9th 2015


Time Observed: 03:00 to 4:00 PM
Task: Concrete finishing work going on
Number of Workers:6

S
No.
1
2

Random No.
Rand()
0.685182552
0.276302088

Value Only
Sorted
0.119604255
0.514519851

Random
minute
7.176255318
30.87119105

Time
3:07 PM
3:30 PM

Time:3:07 PM
Time
3:07 PM
3:08 PM
3:09 PM
3:10 PM
3:11 PM
3:12 PM

Worker
1
X

Worker
2

Worker
3

Worker
4

Worker
5
X

Worker
6
X

X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X

Worker
3

Worker
4

X
X

Total person units = 6 6 = 36


Effective person units = 12
Effectiveness =

12
= 33.33%
36

Time:3:30 PM
Time
3:30 PM
3:31 PM
3:32 PM
3:33 PM
3:34 PM
3:35 PM

Worker
1
X
X

Worker
2
X
X

Worker
5
X

Worker
6

X
X

Total person units = 6 6 = 36


Effective person units = 17
13
= 36.11%
36
33.33 + 36.11
Average 5-minute rating=
= 34.72%
2
v n
uP
u (xi x)
t
= 1.966
Standard Deviation = l=1
n1
Effectiveness =

(b) 95.5% Confidence Intervals


95.5% CI of population = x 2
Hence:

95.5% CI of field rating =[43.64 2 7.61, 43.64 + 2 7.61]


=[28.42, 58.86]
95.5% CI of productivity rating =[37.8 2 8.56, 37.8 + 2 8.56]
=[20.68, 54.92]
95.5% CI of 5 minute rating =[34.72 2 1.966, 34.72 + 2 1.966]
=[30.79, 38.65]

(c) Interpreting the Confidence intervals for a foreman


(i) 95.5 percent of the times the productivity of your crew is between 28.42 to 58.86 percent.
(ii) 95.5 percent of the times productivity of your crew is between 20.68 to 54.92 percent.
(ii) 95.5 percent of the times your crew is 30.79 to 38.65 percent effective.

You might also like