Asian Culture and History

Vol. 1, No. 1

On Linguistic Environment for Foreign Language Acquisition

Chengjun Wang
School of Foreign Languages
Yangtze Normal University
98 Julong Road, Lidu, Fuling, Chongqing 408100, China
Tel: 86-23-7279-0023

E-mail: [email protected]

The research is financed by the Project of Advanced English of Yangtze Normal University. No. 2006-B022 (Sponsoring
information)
Abstract
It is clear that children acquire their first language without explicit learning. A foreign or second language is usually
learned but to some degree may also be acquired or picked up depending on the environmental setting. So, this article
mainly discusses the linguistic environmental setting for foreign language acquisition. It suggested that we should make
an effective linguistic environment for foreign language acquisition in foreign language classroom.
Keywords: Acquisition, Linguistic environment, Linguistic input, Foreign language teaching
1. Introduction
Language acquisition refers to the learning and development of a persons language. The learning of a native or first
language is called first Language Acquisition, and of a second or foreign language, Second Language Acquisition
(Richards Jack C.John Platt and Heidi Platt, 2000). The term acquisition is often preferred to learning because the
latter term is sometimes linked to a behaviorist theory of learning. Language acquisition is studied by linguists,
psychologists and applied linguists to enable them to understand the process used in learning a language, to help
identify stages in the developmental process, and to give a better understand of the nature of language. Techniques used
include longitudinal studies of language learners as well as experimental approaches, and focus on the study of the
development of phonology, grammar, vocabulary, and communicative competence.
Here, we pay more attention to discussing the communicative language of foreign language acquisition related to
linguistic environment. That is to say, the effects of linguistic environment related to that we learn or acquire language
is to communicate with others who speak non-native language.
2. The effects of linguistic environment in society
Are there any effects of linguistic environment on learning or acquiring a foreign language? Most of us know or know
of people who have learnt to speak a foreign language quite fluently without any teaching at all: people who travel and
work abroad a lot; people who stay in their own country but who mix with speakers of another language. Even quite
young children, who drop out of school, often classed as unteachable, become unofficial tourist guides and end up
managing to communicate in several foreign languages. They are not always totally accurate, but they achieve a level of
language ability that is entirely adequate for their needs. There is another case that many young children whose parents
speak different languages (first language and foreign language) can acquire a second language in circumstances similar
to those of first language acquisition, the vast majority of people are not exposed to a second language until much later.
What is it that helps people like these to learn? The linguistic environment for language acquisition is very important.
For the children, they often exposure to the different language and speak in different languages. They not only acquire
their first language but also can acquire the foreign language. For those abroad or mix with speakers of another
language, they are usually very motivated-they have a pressing desire to communicate and to get their meaning across.
They receive a lot exposure--they hear the language in use and pick up expressions they need. And they have many
opportunities to speak and experiment with the language. Their interlocutors do not expect them to be perfect, and will
often support their attempts to communicate by suggesting words and phrases.
58

Asian Culture and History

January, 2009

3. The linguistic environment in the classroom

Today, in language schools all over the world the largest group of students consists of people who have studied English
at school but feel they know nothing and want to start again. Many Chinese school learners (especially non-English
majors) have failed to learn English in much the same way. (Wang Cheng-jun. 2004) They have a small battery of
formulaic phrases, but are unable or too shy to put them to use. Although many of them pass their examinations
successfully, the find they cannot cope in conversation with a fluent speaker. One reason why this happens is because
much of their exposure consists of written language at sentence level: they are used to reading textbook exercises and
hearing carefully scripted dialogues. Many have been exposed to little real spoken interaction other than
instruction-focused teacher talk.
We can say therefore that some people learn a language naturally without classroom instruction. On the other hand,
many people do not learn one in spite of being taught. This is not to say that classroom instruction is useless; indeed
there is evidence to suggest that instruction does help. For example, learners who have had formal instruction and who
then spent time in the country concerned are likely to achieve a higher degree of accuracy than those who have not had
formal instruction. But language lessons on their own bring no guarantee of success. Formal instruction is rarely a
sufficient condition for learning a language.
What is it that prevents students learning or acquiring foreign language which in order to communicate with speakers of
non-native language? In our Chinese classroom (especially non-English major class), they are often large classes. So, in
large classes, learners feel shy about talking in front of the class. Speaking is rarely tested, and exams based on
grammar often result in a lot of direct grammar teaching with focus on form rather than meaning. At present, Chinas
textbooks pay more attention to listening and speaking activities, but learners (non-English majors) fail to use foreign
language correctly and freely when expressing themselves. (Wang Cheng-jun. 2004) There are many more reasons that
learners learn foreign language cannot express themselves freely and correctly. Linguistic environment for language
acquisition is one of the most important reasons. In spite of it is not the only reason for language acquisition.
4. Linguistic environment for foreign language acquisition
Environmentalist theories of learning hold that an organisms nurture, or experience, are of more important to
development than its nature, or innate contributions. Indeed, they will typically deny that innate contributions play any
role at all other than that of providing the animal with the internal structure that environmental forces can proceed to
shape. The best-known examples are the various forms of behaviorist and neo-behaviorist stimulus-response learning
theories, such as those of Skinner (1957), but such positions have had little impact since Chomskys (1959) famous
review of Skinners verbal Behavior, and subsequent writings by Chomsky and his followers, despite attempted
rebuttals and serious problems with nativist alternatives. Neo-behaviorist learning theory was influential in language
teaching circles; chiefly through the underpinnings it provided the Audio-Lingual Method in the work of Fries, Lado,
Politzer, Prator and others (Larsen-Freeman Diane and Michael HLong. 249-250).
In real life, it is clear that children acquire their first language without explicit learning. As we know, Creole languages
are pidgins that have acquired native speakers. In linguistically mixed communities where a pidgin is used as the lingua
franca, children may acquire it as their native language, particularly if their parents normally communicate in the pidgin.
Where this occurs the language will re-acquire all the characteristics of a full, non-pidgin language. As spoken by an
adult native speaker the language will have, when compared vocabulary, a wider range of syntactic possibilities, and an
increased stylistic repertoire. It will also, of course, be used for all purposes in a full range of social situations. That is,
the reduction that occurred during pidginization will be repaired, although the simplification and admixture will remain.
This process whereby reduction is repaired by expansion is known as creolization and is one of the most fascinating
processes of all in linguistic change. Children use a pidgin language as their native language and expand it in part by
calling on the genetic mental resources all human beings are born with-the human language faculty-and that creolization
thus provides us with an unusual and fascinating window into the human mind.
A foreign or second language is usually learned but to some degree may also be acquired or picked up depending on
the environmental setting and the input received by the second-language learner. A pidgin language, then, is a lingua
franca which has no native speakers. It is the product of a multilingual situation in which those who wish to
communicate must find or improvise a simple language system that will enable them to do so. It is derived from a
normal language through simplification, reduction and interference or admixture, often considerable, from the native
language or language of those who use it, especially so far as pronunciation is concerned. The most likely setting for the
crystallization of a true pidgin language is probably a contact situation of this limited type involving three or more
language groups: one dominant language, and at least two non-dominant languages. If contact between the speakers
of the dominant language and the others is minimal, and the imperfectly learned dominant language is then used as a
langua franca among the non-dominant groups, it is not difficult to see how a pidgin might arise.
The linguistic environment is great practical importance for educators of various kinds. As we are teaching foreign
59

Vol. 1, No. 1

Asian Culture and History

language in the classroom, it is very important to create a real communicative environment. The learners communicate
with each other in role-play, this can be use authentic materials or without using materials. That is to say, they can
discuss a given topic using their own words. This needs learners have enough effective linguistic input for foreign
language acquisition.
5. Linguistic input under the linguistic environment
The importance of input for learning came to the fore in the Input Hypothesis theory (Krashen1985,1994), perhaps the
most widely know and controversial account of foreign language (or L2) acquisition. Its central claim is that language
acquisition depends solely on comprehensible input-language which is slightly ahead of the learners current stage but
which they can comprehend through means such as situational clues; language is acquired through trying to understand
what people are saying. The evidence for this claim comes from the adaptations in speech to language learners, from the
initial silent period during which many L2 learners prefer not to speak, and from the success of immersion and
bilingual classrooms (Krashen1985). Fierce critisms were made of Krashens model (Mclaughlin1987, Cook1993), in
particular that learners need to speak as well as listen. The model has gone into abeyance rather than being abandoned
but it is still extremely attractive to many language teachers, and indeed to many linguistics students, because of the
intuitive commonsense of comprehensible input, and because of its brave attempt at an overall model of L2 learning
(Aronoff Mark and Janie Rees-Miller,504).
Learners have few opportunities to communicate with non-native speakers in Chinas classrooms, especially
non-English major classrooms. So, it is difficult to exposure themselves to non-native speakers. In other words, teachers
should offer them more effective linguistic input for foreign language acquisition. This might involve listening, or
reading, or both. It may be a conscious process, or largely subconscious. It involves grappling with meaning and
observing how others express the meanings that they want to be able to express. This leads on to noticing small chunks
of language typically used in particular contexts, for example I have no idea; It doesnt matter; What I think is --- It
involves isolating particular words and phrase, discovering what they mean and noting how they are used. It is only
when such features are noticed, processed in the learners mind and understood that they are likely to become part of
their internalized language system.
Linguistic input for foreign language acquisition is very important. For beginners, rich input such as randomly chosen
listening materials will just be noise. No matter how motivated, beginners are unlikely to be able to notice and pick out
anything comprehensible, and therefore will not learn from them. If learners select a listening material of a familiar type
on a familiar topic and can guess at the kinds of meanings that are likely to be expressed, and how the discourse will
proceed, they will have a better chance of catching something they can understand and subsequently learn from. They
are modifying their input by careful selection. However, if learners initiate a conversation, knowing what the topic and
the purpose of the conversation are, the learners can make sensible predictions about meaning, and check anything they
are not sure of having understood correctly. This modified exposure thus becomes comprehensible input and should
help acquisition.
The same kind of modifying can apply to reading too. By selecting a familiar genre and style of text on a familiar topic,
and by reading and re-reading, parts of the input become comprehensible. Deciphering instructions given in a foreign
language is a good example of this, especially if they are relevant to some task in hand.
6. An effective environment for foreign language acquisition
What is an effective environment for foreign language (or L2) acquisition? Some studies also test participants during
their stay in the host country and are thereby able to inform on early and later changes in the learners pragmatic ability.
Some studies include a control group of students who did not go abroad but continued to participate in foreign language
classes at home, and can thus shed light on whether the gains that the study-abroad students made were in fact
attributable to the study-abroad experience. Finally, some studies include native speakers of the target and /or the
students first language in L1 transfer. Participants in study-abroad research with a focus on pragmatic abilities. It is
very useful that achieve a foreign language in study-abroad. We have no many opportunities to achieve real fluency in a
foreign language country where it is spoken. Our students just learn a foreign language in Chinese classroom, and some
of them are taught by no-English English teachers. So, it is very important to discuss how to effectively learn or acquire
a foreign language in the language classroom as a setting where the target language is taught. The target language is
taught in the language classroom as a subject only and is not commonly used as a medium of communication outside
the classroom. In this sense it includes both foreign language classrooms and second language classrooms where the
learners have no contact with the target language outside the language classroom. Two contextual aspects are of
potential importance in language classroom settings according to Gardner and Clement (1990). One concerns the
learning situation to be found in the classroom. The other is the level of support which parents give to the foreign or
second language program.
With regard to the classroom learning situation, the role relationship between teacher and student are likely to be crucial.
60

Asian Culture and History

January, 2009

In the case of traditional approaches to language teaching, where the target language is perceives primarily as an
object to be mastered by learning about its formal properties, the teacher typically acts as a knower/informer and
the learner as an information seeker (Corder, 1997b in Ellis Rod, 1999). In the case of innovative approaches where
the emphasis is on the use of the target language in social behavior a number of different role relationships are
possible, depending on whether the participants are playing at talk, as in role play activities, or have a real-life
purpose for communicating, as in information gap activities; the teacher can be producer or referee and the learner
actor or player. Corder notes, however, that in real-life situations outside the classroom, a somewhat different role
relationship arises (mentor and apprentice). Thus, even information learning inside the classroom may differ from
that found in natural setting.
As we know, it is very important that give learners opportunities for participating in the classroom. So, we should
consider that the quantity of participation. There is no clear evidence that the extent to which learners participate
productively in the classroom affects their rate of development. We believe that practice does not make perfect, in the
other hand, we suggest that proficiency causes participation. That is, the more proficient the learners are, the more they
get to participate. In order to acquire a foreign language effectively, quality of learner participating cannot be ignored.
While the amount of participation may not be a key factor in foreign language (or L2) acquisition, a stronger case can
be made for the importance of high-quality participation. One of the factors that seems to determine the quality of
learner participation in classroom settings is the degree of control the learners exercise over the discourse. In cases
where participation is strictly controlled, there may be few opportunities for learners to practise communicative
strategies. This may be one of reason why many foreign language learners reliant on the classroom fail to develop much
strategic competence.
Group work is often considered an essential feature of communicative language teaching. Long and Porter (1985)
summarize the main pedagogic arguments in favor of it (Ellis Rod,1999). It increases language practice opportunities, it
improves the quality of student talk, it helps to individualize instruction, it promotes a positive affective climate, and it
motivates learners to learn. In addition to these pedagogic arguments, a psycholinguistic justification has been advanced:
group work provides the kind of input and opportunities for output that promote rapid foreign language (or L2 )
acquisition. It is a good way to learn or acquire foreign in classroom that group work based on tasks. In practice task
refers to the idea of some kind of activity designed to engage the learner in using the language communicatively or
reflectively in order to arrive at an outcome other than that of learning a specified feature of the foreign language (or
L2). The study of tasks has proved to be of the most productive seams of foreign language (or L2) classroom research.
It has been motivated in part by proposals for task-based syllabuses (see Long, 1985b; Prabha, 1987; Long and
Crookes, 1992) (Ellis Rod, 1999). These attempt to specify the content to be taught in terms of a series of activities to
be performed by the students, either with the teacher or in small group work.
In considering what kinds of activity, situation and role are best suited to a specific learning group, the teacher must
consider a number of factors. Teacher should engage his students learning or acquisition in a large proportion of
situations where they will later need to use their communicative language. In this way, he can be confident that most
aspect of the language practised (functions, structures, vocabulary and interpersonal skills) are relevant to learners need.
Learners are more likely to feel involved in situations where they can see the relevance of what they are doing and
learning. If simulation is used, they may be role-playing activities based on their familiar realms of experience. So, the
situations must be capable of stimulating learners to a high degree of communicative involvement.
In a word, the linguistic environmental setting is great practical importance for educators of various kinds. As we are
teaching foreign language in the classroom, it is very important to create a real communicative environment. and offer
students enough effective linguistic environment to exposure to the foreign language and speak in foreign language.
References
Aronoff Mark and Janie Rees-Miller. (2001). The Handbook of Linguistics.Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and
Research Press and Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp504.
Cook, V. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Macmillan. pp.23-76.
Ellis, Rod. (1999). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai foreign Language Education Press.
pp220-228, 598.
Gardner, R. C., & Clment, R. (1990). Social psychological perspectives on second language acquisition. In H. Giles &
W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 495-517.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longmans. Pp23-98.
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages.
London: Academic Press. pp.45-77.
Krashen, S.D. (1985). Inquiries and insights: Second language teaching, immersion, and bilingual education. Hayward,
61

Vol. 1, No. 1

Asian Culture and History

CA: Alemany Press. pp.16.

Kasper, Gabriele & Kenneth RRose. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
pp220-221.
Larsen-Freeman Diane and Michael HLong. (2000). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research.
Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. pp249-250.
Mclaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second Language Learing. London:Edward Arnold. pp.8.
Noam Chomsky. (1959). A Review of B. F. Skinners Verbal Behavior in Language, 35, No. 1, 26-58.
Richards, Jack C, John, Platt & Heidi Platt. (2000). Longman dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics.
Beijing: Foreign language Teaching and Research Press. pp246.
Skinner. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: International Universities Press. pp221-233.
Wang, Chengjun. (2004). On the Cultivation of non -English Major Students Communicative Ability. Journal of
Aviation Flight University of China, Vol.15 No.1, 14-17.

62