Scribd
Upload
55 views4 pages

Evaluation Form Teamwork

The document describes an evaluation of a team discussion and decision making process. It notes that the team had a discussion leader selected by the group, with no sub-leaders or resistance to leadership. All team members participated in the discussion and shared their opinions without interrupting each other. The team reached a solution by voting after about 20 minutes of discussion, which was considered an efficient approach. The solution was clear to all members. The team leader summarized progress and kept the group on time and schedule while maintaining a good working climate.

Uploaded by

api-248119294
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
55 views4 pages

Evaluation Form Teamwork

The document describes an evaluation of a team discussion and decision making process. It notes that the team had a discussion leader selected by the group, with no sub-leaders or resistance to leadership. All team members participated in the discussion and shared their opinions without interrupting each other. The team reached a solution by voting after about 20 minutes of discussion, which was considered an efficient approach. The solution was clear to all members. The team leader summarized progress and kept the group on time and schedule while maintaining a good working climate.

Uploaded by

api-248119294
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

1. Evaluation form (processes)



Observer: Volodymyr Nestayko

Is there a discussion leader? Is he/she pointed out by the team or did he/she
propose him/herself?

-Yes, group has a discussion leader. Leader was pointed out by the team


Is there any resistance against the leadership? Are there sub leaders?

-No sub leaders, and no resistance against the leadership


Do you see subgroups? (For example: same opinions in smaller groups)

-Yes


Does every team member join the discussion?

-Yes, ever team member expressed own opinion during discussion


Do team members interrupt each other? Do they cut each others point of view?

-Team members was waiting their turn. I think leader was trying to listen different
opinions, and in the end proposed a compromise.


Are there team members which opinions are ignored? How does this team member
react?

-No

Is there any non-verbal conduct? (eye movements, hand movements, facial
expressions, etc.)

Yes.


In what way does the team approach the problem?

They decided to vote for the final solution.

Did the team use some form of time planning? No



2. Evaluation form (procedures)

Observer: Volodymyr Nestayko

1.
How much time was required to get at the solution? In retrospect: could you
conceive of a more efficient approach?

- About 20 minutes, was required to get at the solution. I think they chose an
efficient approach.


2.
To what extent is the solution clear to all? (When they did not get to a
solution, how did the play proceed?)

-Solution was very clear

3.
How do you evaluate the transfer of data?

-Sufficient


4.
Were the data used effectively?

-Yes


5.
Was it regularly checked whether all agreed?

-Yes


6.
Was everyone involved in the discussion?

-Yes


7.
Was a chair appointed or was everyone, more or less working on his or her
own?

-Team worked together


8.
Who took care of summarizing and checking progress?

-Team leader



9.

Who watched the time?


-Team leader



10.

Who maintained a good working climate?


-Team leader

You might also like