Chapter 24 - Answer
Chapter 24 - Answer
CHAPTER 24
ADVANCED ANALYSIS AND
APPRAISAL OF PERFORMANCE:
FINANCIAL AND NONFINANCIAL
I.
Questions
1. Return on investment (ROI) is the ratio of profit to amount invested for
the business unit.
2. The measurement issues for ROI are:
a. The effect of accounting policies, which affect the determination of
net income.
b. Other measurement issues for income, which include the handling of
non-recurring items in the income statement, differences in the effect
of income taxes across units, differential effect of foreign currency
exchange, and the effect of cost allocation when two or more units
share a facility or cost.
c. Measuring investment: which assets to include.
d. Measuring investment: allocating the cost of shared assets.
3. The advantages of return on investment are:
a. It is intuitive and easily understood.
b. It provides a useful basis for comparison among SBUs.
c. It is widely used.
The limitations of return on investment are:
a. It has an excessive short-term focus.
b. Investment planning uses discounted cash flow analysis while
managers are evaluated on ROI.
c. It contains a disincentive for new investment by the most profitable
units.
4. The key advantage of residual income is that it deals effectively with the
limitation of ROI, that is ROI has a disincentive for the managers of the
most profitable units to make new investments. With residual income, no
matter how profitable the unit, there is still an incentive for new profitable
investment. In contrast, a key limitation is that since residual income is
not a percentage, it suffers the same problem of profit SBUs in that it is
24-1
Economic
value added =
(EVA)
After tax
operating
income
Weighted
Average Cost x
of Capital
Total Assets
minus Current
Liabilities
II. Exercises
Exercise 1 (ROI and Residual Income)
Requirement 1
A quick inspection of the data shows mortgage loans with a higher ROI to be
more successful. But see requirement 2 below.
Requirement 2
Total Assets
Operating Income
Return on Investment
Residual Income:
(a) * at 11%
(b) ** at 15%
(c) *** at 17%
Division A
(Mortgage Loans)
P2,000
400
25%
P180
100
60
Division B
(Consumer Loans)
P10,000
1,500
15%
P400
0
(200)
*
P400 (P2,000 x 0.11) = P180 P1,500 (P10,000 x 0.11) = P 400
** P400 (P2,000 x 0.15) = P100 P1,500 (P10,000 x 0.15) = P 0
*** P400 (P2,000 x 0.17) = P 60 P1,500 (P10,000 x 0.17) = P(200)
There is no simple answer to which is more successful in terms of residual
income. Division B is more successful at low rates, while A is more
successful at high rates. This reflects an important limitation of residual
income; larger divisions (Division B in this case) are favored when the desired
return used to determine residual income is relatively low.
Exercise 2 (Return on Investment; Comparisons of Three Companies)
Sales
Income
Investment (assets)
Return on sales
Asset turnover
Return on investment
24-4
P480,000
P2,500,000
19.2%
Investing in the new plant would lower JSDs ROI and, hence, limit Tans
bonus.
Requirement 2
The residual income computation for the new plant is as follows:
Residual income = Income - (Imputed interest x Investment)
Investment
Operating income for new plant
Charge for funds
(Investment, P2,500,000 x 15%)
Residual income
P2,500,000
P 480,000
375,000
P 105,000
Investing in the new plant would add P105,000 to JSDs residual income.
Consequently, if Magic Industries could be persuaded to use residual income
to measure performance, Tan would be more willing to invest in the new plant.
Requirement 3
Return on Sales (ROS) =
Operating income
Sales
480,000
2,400,000
20%
If Magic Industries uses ROS to determine Tans bonus, Tan will be more
willing to invest in the new plant because ROS for the new plant of 20%
exceeds the current ROS of 19%.
The advantages of using ROS are (a) that it is simpler to calculate and (b)
that it avoids the negative short-run effects of ROI measures that may induce
24-5
Tan to not make the investment in the new plant. Tan may favor ROS because
she believes that eventually increases in ROS will increase ROI and RI.
The main disadvantage of using ROS is that it ignores the amount of
investment needed to earn a return. For example, ROS may be high but not
high enough to justify the level of investment needed to earn the required
return on an investment.
III. Problems
Problem 1 (RI, EVA)
Requirement 1
Total assets
Current liabilities
Investment
(Total assets current liabilities)
Required return (12% x Investment)
Operating income before tax
Residual income
(Operating income before tax
required return)
Truck Rental
Division
P650,000
120,000
Transportation
Division
P950,000
200,000
530,000
63,600
75,000
750,000
90,000
160,000
11,400
70,000
Requirement 2
After-tax cost of debt financing = (1 0.4) x 10% = 6%
After-tax cost of equity financing = 15%
Weighted average =
cost of capital
9.6%
P50,880
P72,000
45,000
96,000
(5,880)
24,000
24-6
Requirement 3
Both the residual income and the EVA calculations indicate that the
Transportation Division is performing better than the Truck Rental Division.
The Transportation Division has a higher residual income (P70,000 versus
P11,400) and a higher EVA [P24,000 versus P(5,880)]. The negative EVA for
the Truck Rental Division indicates that, on an after-tax basis, the division is
destroying value the after-tax economic return from the Truck Rental
Divisions assets is less than the required return. If EVA continues to be
negative, Lighthouse may have to consider shutting down the Truck Rental
Division.
Problem 2 (ROI, RI, Measurement of Assets)
The method for computing profitability preferred by each manager follows:
Manager of
S
P
F
Method Chosen
Residual income based on net book value
Residual income based on gross book value
ROI based on either gross or net book value
Supporting Calculations:
Division
S
P
F
Division
S
P
F
The biggest weakness of ROI is the tendency to reject projects that will lower
historical ROI even though the prospective ROI exceeds the required ROI. RI
achieves goal congruence because subunits will make investments as long as
24-7
they earn a rate in excess of the required return for investments. The biggest
weakness of residual income is it favors larger divisions in ranking
performance. The greater the amount of the investment (the size of the
division), the more likely that larger divisions will be favored assuming that
income grows proportionately.
Problem 3 (Multinational Performance Measurement, ROI, RI)
Requirement 1
(a)
Phil. Divisions ROI in 2005 =
Operating income
Total assets
Operating income
P8,000,000
15%
15.3%
9,180,000 kronas
60,000,000 kronas
Requirement 2
Convert total assets into pesos at December 31, 2004 exchange rate, the rate
prevailing when the assets were acquired (8 kronas = P1)
24,000,000 kronas =
60,000,000 kronas
=
8 kronas per peso
P7,500,000
Convert operating income into pesos at the average exchange rate prevailing
when during 2005 when operating income was earned equal to
9,180,000 kronas
8.5 kronas per peso = P1,080,000
Comparable ROI for Swedish Division =
P1,080,000
P7,500,000
14.4%
P130,000
P340,000
38.24%
Visayas Division
P220,000
P1,150,000
19.13%
Mindanao Division
P380,000
P1,620,000
23.46%
12 x P 70,000
24-9
P 840,000
Visayas
Mindanao
12 x P100,000
12 x P120,000
=
=
P1,200,000
P1,440,000
Step 1: Restate long-term assets from gross book value at historical costs to
gross book value at current cost as of the end of 2005.
Gross book value of
long-term assets at
historical cost
Luzon
P 840,000 x (170 100) = P1,428,000
Visayas
P1,200,000 x (170 136) = P1,500,000
Mindanao
P1,440,000 x (170 160) = P1,530,000
Step 2: Derive net book value of long-term assets at current cost as of the
end of 2005. (Estimated useful life of each plant is 12 years).
Gross book value of
long-term assets at
current cost at the
end of 2005
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
P1,428,000 x (2 12)
P1,500,000 x (9 12)
P1,530,000 x (11 12)
=
=
=
P 238,000
P1,125,000
P1,402,500
Step 3: Compute current cost of total assets at the end of 2005. (Assume
current assets of each plant are expressed in 2005 pesos.)
Current assets at the end
Net book value of long-term assets at
+ current cost at the end of 2005 (Step 2)
of 2005 (given)
Luzon
P200,000 + P238,000
= P 438,000
Visayas
P250,000 + P1,125,000
= P1,375,000
Mindanao
P300,000 + P1,402,500
= P1,702,500
Step 4: Compute current-cost depreciation expense in 2005 pesos.
Gross book value of long-term assets at current cost at the end of 2005
(from Step 1) x (1 12)
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
P1,428,000 x (1 12)
P1,500,000 x (1 12)
P1,530,000 x (1 12)
24-10
=
=
=
P119,000
P125,000
P127,500
Step 5:
Compute 2005 operating income using 2005 current-cost
depreciation.
Historical-cost
operating income
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
Current-cost depreciation
Historical-cost
depreciation
=
=
=
P 81,000
P195,000
P372,500
Step 6: Compute ROI using current-cost estimate for long-term assets and
depreciation.
Operating income for 2005 using 2005 current cost depreciation (Step 5)
Current cost of total assets at the end of 2005 (Step 3)
P 81,000 P 438,000
P195,000 P1,375,000
P372,500 P1,702,500
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
=
=
=
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
18.49%
14.18%
21.88%
ROI: Current Cost
18.49%
14.18%
21.88%
Use of current cost results in the Mindanao Division appearing to be the most
efficient. The Luzon ROI is reduced substantially when the ten-year-old plant
is restated for the 70% increase in construction costs over the 1995 to 2005
period.
Requirement 3
Use of current costs increases the comparability of ROI measures across
divisions operating plants built at different construction cost price levels. Use
of current cost also will increase the willingness of managers, evaluated on the
basis of ROI, to move from divisions with assets purchased many years ago to
division with assets purchased in recent years.
IV. Multiple Choice Questions
1. A
2. B
3. C
11.
12.
13.
B
D
C
21.
22.
23.
24-11
C
D
C
31.
32.
33.
A
A
B
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
C
D
B
A
C
B
A
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
A
C
C
A
C
B
A
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
24-12
A
C
D
A
C
D
D
34.
35.
36.
37.
A
C
B
D