Scribd
Upload
137 views1 page

Assessment Rubric-Practicum1

The document provides an assessment rubric to evaluate student class and project works. It outlines six categories - problem solving, programming, documentation, design and creativity, team work, and presentation. For each category, it defines the criteria for work that exceeds expectations, meets expectations, and is unsatisfactory. Work that exceeds expectations demonstrates advanced logical thinking, well-structured and user-friendly code, thorough documentation, creative design, strong collaboration, and enthusiastic presentation skills. Work that meets expectations shows clear logic, functional though improvable code, sufficient documentation, adequate design, collaboration as required, and clear presentation. Work that is unsatisfactory lacks logical processes, has non-working or copied code, poor documentation, incomplete design, little team contribution,

Uploaded by

api-279596018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
137 views1 page

Assessment Rubric-Practicum1

The document provides an assessment rubric to evaluate student class and project works. It outlines six categories - problem solving, programming, documentation, design and creativity, team work, and presentation. For each category, it defines the criteria for work that exceeds expectations, meets expectations, and is unsatisfactory. Work that exceeds expectations demonstrates advanced logical thinking, well-structured and user-friendly code, thorough documentation, creative design, strong collaboration, and enthusiastic presentation skills. Work that meets expectations shows clear logic, functional though improvable code, sufficient documentation, adequate design, collaboration as required, and clear presentation. Work that is unsatisfactory lacks logical processes, has non-working or copied code, poor documentation, incomplete design, little team contribution,

Uploaded by

api-279596018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Assessment Rubric: Class and Project works!

Categories/Scale Exceeds Expectations

Problem solving

Programming

Documentation

Design and
Creativity

Team Work

Presentation

Meets Expectations

Unsatisfactory

Students works exhibit


clearly logical thinking and
problem solving with well laid
out components and sub
components and their
interconnection using both
flowchart and pseudocode.

Students works exhibit


clear logical thinking by
splitting problems into
smaller components and
depict the same
graphically using
flowcharts. There may
be minor errors.

Students works do not


demonstrate the
logical process
involved in solving
problems or works are
incomplete.

Codes are working, well


structured, and demonstrate
advanced programming skills.
Student is able to tweak his
own code creatively and uses
techniques effectively. The
codes are user friendly.

Codes are working, but


require additional work
on designs, techniques
and creativity. Codes are
somewhat user-friendly.

Codes are not working


and errors are evident.
Codes may be copied
without clear
demonstration of
comprehension.
Codes are not userfriendly.

Codes are well documented


and clear to follow the logical
flow and organization of
programs. Student uses
appropriately single and
multiline comments
throughout programs
uniformly.

Codes are documented


and easy enough to
follow the flow of the
program. Student may
use comments
generously but may lack
inconsistency at times.

Codes are not well


documented and
difficult follow the flow
and organization of
programs. Comments
are not used
consistently and
uniformly.

Project is creative and unique.


Solutions are logically thought
out with advanced techniques
in solving problems and
handling errors efficiently.

Project is somewhat
creative, has sufficient
project design and
applied some
techniques with minor
deficiencies.

Project is incomplete
and lacks creativity in
project design.

student is able to collaborate


with others, shares ideas and
insights freely, seeks opinions
from others, and contributes
concretely towards completion
of team work.

Student is able to
collaborate, shares
ideas and contributes
as required.

student either lacks


interest in team work
or does not contribute
sufficiently to team
work, and fails to
share ideas.

Student articulates and


highlights key features and
techniques enthusiastically
using visuals, demonstrates
working project, and engages
in conversation with others
actively, and responds to
quires intelligently within
specified time.

Student articulates and


highlights key points
clearly, demonstrates
working program and is
able to answers to
queries adequately.

Student lacks clarity in


presenting key ideas
and techniques, does
not demonstrate
working program, may
get confused with
concept, does not
answer questions and
does not engage
others.

You might also like