DepEd Order No. 2, Series 2015

DepEd Order No.2, s.
2015
Guidelines on the Establishment
& Implementation of the Results based Performance Management
System (RPMS) in the
Department of Education
Lead, Engage, Align & Do! (LEAD)
Policy Statement
The
DepEd
hereby
sets
the
guidelines on the establishment and
implementation of the RPMS in the
department
stipulating
the
strategies,
methods,
tools
and
rewards
for
assessing
the
accomplishment
vis--vis
the
commitments. This will be used for
measuring and rewarding higher
levels of performance of the various
Policy Statement
For non-school based personnel,
the RPMS shall provide for an
objective and verifiable basis for
rating
and
ranking
the
performance
of
units
and
individual personnel in view of
the granting of PerformanceBased Bonus(PBB) starting 2015.
Policy Statement
For school-based personnel, the
RPMS shall be used only as an
appraisal tool, which shall be the
basis for training and development.
The granting of PBB shall be
governed by the existing PBB
guidelines.
The Department shall adopt the
RPMS Framework
WHAT
Strategic
Priorities
VISION,
MISSION,
VALUES
(VMV)
Department
/ Functional
Area Goals
KRAs and
Objectives
HOW
Values
Competencie
s
CENTRAL
REGIONAL
DIVISION
SCHOOL
S
DEPED RPMS FRAMEWORK
The framework aligns efforts to enable DepEd to

actualize its strategic goals and vision.
Policy Statement
The DepEd RPMS shall
follow the four-stage
performance management
system cycle as
prescribed by the CSC
Phase 1
Performance
Planning and
Commitment
1. Discuss Units Objectives

2. Identify Individual KRAs,
Objectives and Performance
Indicators
3. Discuss Competencies Required
and Additional Competencies
Needed
4. Reaching Agreement
CATEGORY
DEFINITION
Effectiveness/Quality
The extent to which actual

performance compares with
targeted performance.
The degree to which objectives
are achieved and the extent to
which targeted problems are
solved.
In management, effectiveness
relates to getting the right things
done.
Efficiency
The extent to which time or

resources is used for the intended
task or purpose. Measure whether
targets are accomplished with a
minimum amount or quantity of
waste, expense or unnecessary
effort.
Category
Timeliness
Definition
Measures whether the
deliverable was done on time
based on the requirements of the
rules and regulations, and /or
clients/stakeholders.
Time-related performance
indicators evaluate such things
as project completion deadlines,
time management skills and
other time- sensitive
expectations
Phase 2
Performance Monitoring and
Coaching
1. Performance Tracking
2. Coaching/Feedback
Heart of the
RPMS
Phase 3
Performance Review and
Evaluation
1. Review
1. Performance
Reviewing
Performance
2. Discuss Strengths and

Improvement Needs
The RPMS Rating Scale
Scale
3
2
Adjectival
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Description
Performance represents an extraordinary level of
achievement and commitment in terms of quality and
time , technical skills and knowledge, ingenuity,
creativity and initiative. Employees at this performance
level should have demonstrated exceptional job mastery
in all major areas of responsibility. Employee
achievement and contributions to the organization are of
marked excellence.
Performance exceeded expectation. All goals, objectives,
and targets were achieved above the established
standards.
Performance met expectations in terms of quality of
work, efficiency and timeliness. The most critical annual
goals were met.
Performance failed to meet expectations, and/or one or
more of the most critical goals were not met.
Performance was consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made.
Significant improvement is needed in one or more
Sample Computation
KRAs
KRA 1
KRA 2
Weight
Per KRA
40
20
Objectiv
es
Weight
Per
Objectiv
es
Rating
Score
Objective
1
10%
0.400
Objective
2
20%
1.000
Objective
3
10%
0.300
Objective
1
10%
0.300
Objective
2
5%
0.150
Objective
5%
0.200
Sample Computation
KRAs
KRA 3
KRA 4
Weight
Per KRA
30
10
Objectiv
es
Weight
Per
Objectiv
es
Rating
Score
Objective
1
10%
0.400
Objective
2
15%
0.450
Objective
3
5%
0.150
Objective
1
5%
0.150
Objective
2
2.50%
0.075
Objective
2.50%
0.100
Adjectival Ratings
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000
Outstanding
3.500 4.499
Very Satisfactory
2.500 3.499
Satisfactory
1.500 2.499
Unsatisfactory
Below 1. 499
Poor
*DepEds Competencies
Scale
Scale
Definition
Role model
Consistently
demonstrates
Most of the time

demonstrates
Sometimes
demonstrates
1
Rarely demonstrates
5 (role model) - all competency
indicators
4 (consistently demonstrates) four competency
indicators
3 (most of the time demonstrates) three competency
indicators
2 (sometimes demonstrates) two competency
indicators
Phase 4
Performance Rewarding and
Development Planning
1. Rewards
2. Development Planning
RPMS Cycle
or School-Based Personnel
Performance
Planning
Phase I
May
Mid-Year
Review
Phase II
November
Year-End
Results
Phases III & IV
April
RPMS Cycle
r non School-Based Personnel
Performance
Planning
Phase I
December
Mid-Year
Review
Phase II
July
Year-End
Results
Phases III & IV
December
Composition of Performance
Management Team
Division PMT
School PMT
Chair: ASDS (most senior in terms Chair: Principal-elect

of tenure as ASDS
Members:
Members:
Planning Officer III

Accountant III
Chief Administrative Officer V
One(1) Education Program
Supervisor
One(1) Principals
Representative (Elementary :
PESPA)
One(1) Principals
Representative (Secondary :
NAPPSSHI, NAPPSSPHIL
One(1) representative from the
teacher association for
* Four(4) Master Teacher/Head

Teacher
* One(1) representative from the
School Planning Team
* One(1) Administrative
Officer/Representative from nonteaching group
Division PMT
School PMT
Composition of Performance
One(1) representative from the
teacher
association
Management
Team
One(1) NEU-Division Chapter

Representative
Observer:
One(1) PTA Division Federation
Representative
Observer:
One(1) PTA Representative
Secretariat:
Administrative Office
Secretariat:
Administrative Office
Composition of the Grievance

Committee
Schools Division Office
Schools
Chair: SDS
Chair: ASDS
Members:
Legal Officer
HRMO
EPS
Accountant
PESPA representative
NEU
Members:
PSDS
HRMO/AO
Principal
Master Teacher/Head Teacher
Teachers Association
RATEE
RATER
APPROVING
AUTHORITY
Schools Division
Office
1. Superintendent
2. Asst.
Superintendent
3. Chief of Division
4. Education Program
Supervisor
5. District Supervisor
6. Section Chief/Unit
Head
7. Staff
1. Asst. Regional
Director
2. Superintendent
3. Asst.
Superintendent
7. Section Chief/Unit
Head
1.
2.
3.
4.
Regional Director
Asst. Director
Superintendent
Asst.
Superintendent
5. Asst.
Superintendent
6. Asst.
Superintendent
7. Head of Division
RATEE
RATER
APPROVING
AUTHORITY
Schools
1. Principal
2. Head/Master
Teacher
1. Asst.
Superintendent
2. Principal
3. Teacher
4. Non -Teaching Staff
3. Head/Master
Teacher
4. Principal
1. Superintendent
2. Superintendent
(Small & Medium
Divisions)
Asst.
Superintendent(Large
& Very Large
Divisions)
3. Principal
4. Administrative
Officer V
Behind every
successful
person, there is
one
elementary
truth.
Somewhere,
someway,
someone cared
about
their growth and
development.

DepEd Order No. 2, Series 2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DepEd Order No. 2, Series 2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DepEd Order No. 2, Series 2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DepEd Order No.2, s.

DEPED RPMS FRAMEWORK

The framework aligns efforts to enable DepEd to

1. Discuss Units Objectives

The extent to which actual

The extent to which time or

2. Discuss Strengths and

The RPMS Rating Scale

Most of the time

r non School-Based Personnel

Chair: ASDS (most senior in terms Chair: Principal-elect

Planning Officer III

* Four(4) Master Teacher/Head

One(1) NEU-Division Chapter

Composition of the Grievance

You might also like