CFD Analysis of Heat Transfer in A Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Using Fluent
CFD Analysis of Heat Transfer in A Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Using Fluent
CFD Analysis of Heat Transfer in A Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Using Fluent
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the work in this thesis entitled CFD analysis of heat
transfer in a helical coil heat exchanger using fluent by Siddhartha Shankar
Behera, has been carried out under my supervision in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical
Engineering during session 2012-2013 in the Department of Mechanical
Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.
to any
Date: 07/05/2013
Page i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am extremely fortunate to be involved in an exciting and challenging research
project like CFD analysis of heat transfer in a helical coil heat exchanger using
Page ii
Contents
Certificate
Acknowledgement
i
ii
List of Tables
iv
List of Figures
Abstract
vi
Nomenclature
1. Introduction About the Project
vii
1
1.5 Applications
2. Literature Survey
3. CFD Analysis
3.1 Geometry
9
12
13
3.1.1 Sketching
13
3.1.2 Sweep
13
3.1.3 Merging
13
3.2 Mesh
15
3.2.1 y+ Values
15
16
3.3 Solution
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ROURKELA
17
Page iii
17
3.3.2 Models
17
3.3.3 Materials
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
21
22
4.2 Contours
23
4.3 Vectors
27
4.4 Plots
29
5. Conclusions
31
6. References
32
List of Tables
Figure Number
Caption
Page Number
14
15
Boundary Conditions
18
Residuals
19
22
22
Page iv
Figure Number
Caption
Page Number
Wall Convection
Original Geometry
14
14
Mesh
16
16
Named Selections
17
23
23
10
24
11
24
12
25
13
25
14
26
15
26
16
27
17
27
(A)
1 (B)
18
28
19
28
20
Scaled Reisduals
29
21
29
22
30
23
30
Page v
ABSTRACT
Heat exchangers are the important engineering systems with wide variety of
applications including power plants, nuclear reactors, refrigeration and airconditioning systems, heat recovery systems, chemical processing and food industries.
Helical coil configuration is very effective for heat exchangers and chemical reactors
because they can accommodate a large heat transfer area in a small space, with high
heat transfer coefficients. This project deals with the analysis of the helical coiled heat
exchanger with various correlations given by different papers for specific conditions.
Although various configurations are available, the basic and most common design
consists of a series of stacked helically coiled tubes placed in a cylindrical outer cover.
The inner tube ends are connected to manifolds, which act as fluid entry and exit
locations. And the outer tube is also provided with inlet and outlet manifolds so that
cooling fluid can be passed through it. The tube bundle is constructed of a number of
tubes stacked atop each other, and the entire bundle is placed inside a helical casing, or
shell. The complex fluid-dynamic inside curved pipe heat exchangers gives them
important advantages over the performance of straight tubes in terms of area/volume
ratio and enhancing of heat transfer and mass transfer coefficient. Convective heat
transfer between a surface and the surrounding fluid in a heat exchanger has been a
major issue and a topic of study for a long time. The analysis of these various
correlations with certain defined data is presented in this project. In this study, an
attempt has been made to analyze the effect of counter-flow on the total heat transfer
from a helical tube. The temperature contours, velocity vectors, surface nusselt
number, total heat transfer rate from the wall of the tube was calculated and plotted
using ANSYS 13.0. Copper was chosen as the metal for the construction of the helical
tube. The fluid flowing through the inner tube and outer casing was taken as water.
Page vi
NOMENCLATURE
Pr = Prandtl number
U = velocity (ms1)
V= volume (m3)
= curvature ratio
= viscosity (kgm1s1)
= density (kgm3)
av = average
i = internal
LM = log mean
o = external
ov = overall
w = wall
Page vii
Chapter 1
Page | 1
Page | 2
Page | 3
The value of h depends upon the properties of fluid within the film region; hence it
is called Heat Transfer Coefficient. It depends on various properties of fluid, linear
dimensions of surface and fluid velocity (i.e. nature of flow).
The overall heat transfer coefficient is the overall transfer rate of a series or parallel
combination of convective and conductive walls. The overall Heat Transfer Coefficient is
expressed in terms of thermal resistances of each fluid stream. The summation of individual
resistances is the total thermal resistance and its inverse is the overall heat transfer
coefficient, U.
Where, U = overall heat transfer coefficient based on outside area of tube all
A = area of tube wall
h = convective heat transfer coefficient
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ROURKELA
Page | 4
Page | 5
Page | 6
Page | 7
Page | 8
Chapter 2
Literature review
Page | 9
Page | 10
Page | 11
Chapter 3
CFD analysis
Page | 12
Page | 13
State Type
Inner_Fluid
Fluid
Inner_Pipe
Solid
Outer_Fluid
Fluid
Outer_Pipe
Solid
Page | 14
values play a significant role in turbulence modeling for the near wall treatment.
y+ is a non-dimensional distance. It is often used to describe how coarse or fine a mesh is for
a particular flow pattern. It determines the proper size of the cells near domain walls. The
turbulence model wall laws have restrictions on the y+ value at the wall. For instance, the
standard K-epsilon model requires a wall y+ value between approximately 300 and 100. A
faster flow near the wall will produce higher values of y+, so the grid size near the wall must
be reduced. y+ values for different wall treatments are given in table 2
Table 2 y+ Values for Different Wall Treatments
Wall treatment method
Recommended y+ values
y+ < 5
y+ < 5
y+ 1
y+ < 1
Smoothing: high
Nodes: 586300
Elements: 53170
Page | 15
Figure 5 Mesh
Page | 16
Page | 17
Condition
Type
Turbulent
Velocity
Turbulent
Magnitude
Kinetic Energy
0.9942 m/s
0.01 m2/s2
0.1 m2/s3
348 K
Dissipation
Temperature
Rate
Inner_Inlet
Velocity Inlet
Inner_Outlet
Pressure Outlet -
Outer_Inlet
Velocity Inlet
0.01 m2/s2
0.1 m2/s3
283 K
Outer_Outlet
Pressure Outlet -
1.8842 m/s
Area = 1 m2
Temperature = 348 K
Scheme = Simple
Page | 18
Pressure = Standard
Density = 1 kg/m3
Then the solution initialization method is set to Standard Initialization whereas the
reference frame is set to Relative cell zone. The inner_inlet is selected from the compute from
drop down list and the solution is initialized.
3.3.9 Measure of Convergence
It is tried to have a nice convergence throughout the simulation and hence criteria is
made strict so as to get an accurate result. For this reason residuals are given as per the table 4
that follows.
Table 4 Residuals
Variable
Residual
x-velocity
10-6
y-velocity
10-6
z-velocity
10-6
Continuity
10-6
10-5
10-5
Energy
10-9
Page | 19
Page | 20
Chapter 4
Page | 21
The mass flow rate and total heat transfer rate are given in the tables below.
(kg/s)
inner_inlet
0.14690745
inner_outlet
-0.14690745
interior-part-inner_fluid
60.470463
interior-part-outer_fluid
-83.482896
outer_inlet
0.21353984
outer_outlet
-0.21353761
Net
2.2285868e-06
(w)
inner_inlet
30626.679
inner_outlet
-23526.716
outer_inlet
-13529.476
outer_outlet
6429.4192
Net
-0.094444952
Page | 22
Page | 23
Page | 24
Page | 25
Page | 26
4.3 Vectors
The plots give an idea of flow separation at several parts of the heat exchanger.
Page | 27
Page | 28
Page | 29
Page | 30
CONCLUSIONS
A CFD package (ANSYS FLUENT 13.0) was used for the numerical study of heat
transfer characteristics of a helical coiled double pipe heat exchanger for counter flow and the
results were then compared with that of the parallel flow. The CFD results when compared
with the experimental results from different studies were well within the error limits. The
study showed that there is not much difference in the heat transfer performances of the
parallel-flow configuration and the counter-flow configuration. Nusselt number at different
points along the pipe length was determined from the numerical data. The simulation was
carried out for water to water heat transfer characteristics and different inlet temperatures
were studied. Nusselt number for the pipes was found to be varying from 340-360.
Characteristics of the fluid flow were also studied for the constant temperature and
constant wall heat flux conditions. From the velocity vector plot it was found that the fluid
particles were undergoing an oscillatory motion inside both the pipes.
From the pressure and temperature contours it was found that along the outer side of
the pipes the velocity and pressure values were higher in comparison to the inner values.
Page | 31
REFERENCES
1. Experimental and CFD study of a single phase cone-shaped helical coiled heat
exchanger: an empirical correlation. By Daniel Flrez-Orrego, ECOS June 26-29, 2012.
2. Helically Coiled Heat Exchangers by J.S.Jayakumar.
3. Numerical And Experimental Studies of a Double pipe Helical Heat Exchanger by
Timothy John Rennie, Dept. of Bio-resource Engg. McGill University, Montreal
August 2004.
4. Experimental and CFD estimation of heat transfer in helically coiled heat exchangers
by J.S. Jayakumar, S.M. Mahajani, J.C. Mandal, P.K. Vijayan, and Rohidas Bhoi,
2008, Chemical Engg Research and Design 221-232.
5. Heat Transfer Optimization of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger through CFD Studies
by Usman Ur Rehman, 2011, Chalmers University of Technology.
6. Structural and Thermal Analysis of Heat Exchanger with Tubes of Elliptical Shape by
Nawras H. Mostafa Qusay R. Al-Hagag, IASJ, 2012,Vol-8 Issue-3.
7. Numerical analysis of forced convection heat transfer through helical channels Dr. K.
E. Reby Roy, IJEST, July-2012 vol-4.
8. Minton P.E., Designing Spiral Tube Heat Exchangers, Chemical Engineering, May
1970, p. 145.
9. Noble, M.A., Kamlani, J.S., and McKetta, J.J., Heat Transfer in Spiral Coils,
Petroleum Engineer, April 1952, p. 723.
Heat Transfer Analysis of Helical Coil Heat Exchanger with Circular and Square
Coiled Pattern by Ashok B. Korane, P.S. Purandare, K.V. Mali, IJESR, June 2012,
vol-2, issue-6.
Page | 32