Scribd
Upload
94 views15 pages

Edu - Sharif - Mehr at Khjavadi Ir - Ac - Ari at KH - Javadi Taeibi@sharif - Edu Javadi - Ali@ari - Ac.ir

This document summarizes a research paper presented at the 9th Conference on Jet Flow Dynamics in March 2005 at Shiraz University. The paper introduces a new method for controlling the interaction and reducing mixing between a main jet flow and a cross-flow using two small inhibiting jets placed next to the main jet. The interaction of the vorticity fields from the main jet and inhibiting jets causes the breakup of formed vortices and significantly reduces the interaction between the jet and cross-flow. The study aims to examine and compare the wall shear stress with and without inhibiting jets. Numerical simulations using a finite volume method on a non-uniform moving grid showed that using inhibiting jets can substantially reduce wall drag caused by surface friction.

Uploaded by

feri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
94 views15 pages

Edu - Sharif - Mehr at Khjavadi Ir - Ac - Ari at KH - Javadi Taeibi@sharif - Edu Javadi - Ali@ari - Ac.ir

This document summarizes a research paper presented at the 9th Conference on Jet Flow Dynamics in March 2005 at Shiraz University. The paper introduces a new method for controlling the interaction and reducing mixing between a main jet flow and a cross-flow using two small inhibiting jets placed next to the main jet. The interaction of the vorticity fields from the main jet and inhibiting jets causes the breakup of formed vortices and significantly reduces the interaction between the jet and cross-flow. The study aims to examine and compare the wall shear stress with and without inhibiting jets. Numerical simulations using a finite volume method on a non-uniform moving grid showed that using inhibiting jets can substantially reduce wall drag caused by surface friction.

Uploaded by

feri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

-

[email protected]
[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

) (



:
.
.

.
.

SIMPLE .
.
.


] .[
:

-Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equation






.

) ( . :


] . .[
:
) (:[]
jetV jet
= &M
cf Vcf

M jet cf
.
:
V jet
VCF

=R

R .
] [ ] [ ] [
] [
)
( ] [ ] [
:
jetV jet D jet
.

= Re jet


.


.

Blowing Ratio
Cross Flow

1
2

. .

.

. ./ ./
. .
) (
.
.

.
.


: ...
.

.
.
.


. : ] [
. .

:
)(

U i
=0
xi

)Reynolds Averaging Navier-Stocks Equation (RANS

) + ( u i u j
x j

)(

U i
p
U i U j

=
+
+
x j
xi x j x j
xi

U j

ui u j
.


.
.
.
.
.
RANS .

.
] .[
.
. [] SST
:
U i

k
Dk
* k +
= ij
) ( + k t

x j
x j
x j
Dt

)(


) ( + t

x j

)(

U i
1 k D

= ij
2 +
x j x j Dt
x j
x j
t

+ 2 (1 F1) 2

) (

ui u j

xk

)
)(

u i u j u k + p ( kj u i + ik u j ) +
xk
x k

2 k u j u m ikm + ui u m jkm

u j
2 u i

x k xk

ui u j +
= U k u i u j
t
x k

u j
U j
U i
+ p i +
ui u k
+ u j uk

x k
x k
x j x i

)Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS


)Large Eddy Simulation (LES
3
)Reynolds Stress Model (RSM
4
Shear Stress Transport
2



.
SIMPLE
.
.


] [
/ ./
. / )
( .
.
: :

.
] [ .


) (
. .

.
.

LDV3
) (k- ] [ ]) [
(SST . ) (U .

- Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equation


)- Three Diagonal Matrix Algorithm (TDMA
3
-Laser Doppler Velocimetry
2

.

] [ .

:
] ... .[

) . (
] .[
.
.
.
] .[

.
.
.


.
.

.

.
.

. .


.
.
.
.

] .[
.

.

.

.
.
) (U Z/D=0
X/D=1,3,8,15 . X/D=1

) ( .
) ( .

.

. X/D=15 .

) X/D=8 (X/D=40
.
) ( .

.
) (U Z/D=-0.5 X/D=1,3,8,15
.
) X/D=5 (X/D=40
.
.
) (U Z/D=-1 X/D=1,3,8,15 .


.
.


) (
.
.
.
:
U p UW

)(

Yp 0

=
W

U
Y

=
Y =0

U
Y

UP YP .
Uw .
:
Up

)(

Yp

Up 0
Yp 0

=
Y =0

U
Y

YP
.

.
)
( .
.
) X/D (

. ) (
.
. :
w

) (

1
2
U
2

= Cf

Cf
:
u
) (
w = .
y y =0


.
.

.
% .

.
) (
.

.
:
)(

1/ 4

w = 0.0225U 2

5*105<Re<5*107
.
]:[
1/ 7

)(

y
u =U


:
)(

for 5*105<Re<5*107

0.0577
[Re x ]1/ 5

== C f

.
:



) (
.
.

Blasius



.


) (
.

.
) (



.
.



. %
.
.
.

.
.

) (
.
:

) (

) .(%
.

10

Margason, R.J. 1993 Fifty Years of Jet in Cross Flow Research, AGARD CP-534.
Darbandi, M., Taiebi-Rahni, M., Schneider, G.E., Javadi, K., and Javadi A. 2003 Numerical
Prediction on the Interaction of a Jet and a Turbulent Boundary Layer, 33rd AIAA Fluid
Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida.
3. Feric, T.F. 1990 Structure of Near Field of the Transverse Jet, Ph.D. Thesis, Mech. Eng.,
Caltech University, Pasadena, CA, U.S.A.
4. Hass, W., Rodi, W., and Schonung B. 1992 The Influence of Density Difference Between Hot
and Coolant Gas on Film Cooling by a Row of Holes: Prediction and Experiments, J. of
Turbomachinery, Vol. 114.
5. Haven, B.A. and Kurosaka, M. 1997 Kidney and Anti-kidney Vortices in Crossflow Jets, J. of
Fluid Mech., Vol. 352 , pp. 27-64.
6. Azzi, A. and Jubran, B.A. 2003 Numerical Modeling of Film Cooling from Short Length Streamwise Injection Holes, J. Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 39., No. 4, pp. 345-353.
7. Ligrani, P.M., Ciriello, S., and Bishop, D.t. 1992 Heat Transfer, Adiabatic Effectiveness, and
Injectant Distributions Downstream of a Single Row and two Staggered Rows of Compound
Angle Film Cooling Holes, ASME J. Turbomachinery, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 687-700.
8. Golstein, R.J. and Stone, L.D. 1997 Row-of-Holes Film Cooling of Curved Walls at Low
Injection Angle, Transactions of ASME, Vol. 119, pp.574-579.
9. McGrath L.E. and Leylek J.H. 1999 Physics of Hot Crossflow Ingestion in Film Cooling, ASME
J., Vol. 121.
10. Le Brocq, P.V., Launder, B.E., and Pridin, C.H. 1971 Discrete Hole Injection as a Means of
Transpiration Cooling, an Experimental Study, Dept. of Mech. Eng., Imperial College of Science
and Technology, Rep. No. EHT/TN/A26/1971.
11. Javadi A., Javadi K., Taeibi-Rahni M., and Darbandi M. 2003 A New Approach to Improve Film
Cooling Effectiveness Using Combined Jets, 8th Congress of Int. Gas Turbine Congress, Tokyo.
12. Javadi A., Javadi K., Taeibi-Rahni M., and Keimasi M. 2002 Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models
for Prediction of Shear Stress Terms in Cross Flow Film Cooling Numerical Simulation, 4th
Int. ASME/JSME/KSME Symposium, Hyatt Regency, Vancouver, CANADA.
13. Menter, F.R. 1994 Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering
1.
2.

Applications, AIAA J., Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 15981605.


14. Ajersch, P., Zhou, J.M., Ketler, S., Salcudean, M., and Gartshore, I.S. 1995 Multiple Jets in a
Crossflow: Detailed Measurements and Numerical Simulations, ASME Paper, 95-GT-9,pp.1-16.
15. Keimasi, M.R. and Taeibi-Rahni, M. 2001 Numerical Simulation of Jets in a Cross Flow Using
Different Turbulence Models, AIAA J. Vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 2268-2277.
16. Shames, I.H., 2003 Mechanics of Fluids, 4th Ed., McGraw hill, NY.

. :

Imax Jmax

Kmax

11

.x/D=5

4
Exp. Ajersch
Comp. Ajersch
)SST (Keimasi
)K-E (Keimasi
)RSM (This Work

4
Exp. Ajersch
Comp. Ajersch
)SST (Keimasi
)K-E (Keimasi
)RSM (This Work

3.5
3

Y/D

2.5
2
1.5

0.5

0
-0.05

2
jet

uv / V jet2

x/D=5

-0.1

uv / V

-0.15

Y/D

1.5

0.5

Y/D

-0.02

3.5

2.5

1.5

-0.04

Exp. Ajersch
Comp. Ajersch
)SST. (Keimasi
)K-E. (Keimasi
)RSM. (This Work

3.5

2.5

-0.06

0.5

0
-0.2

1.5

0.5

0
0

U/VJET

x/D=1

x/D=3

) ( uv / V jet2 .

2.5

2.5

2.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

Y /D

2 -0.5-2

1.5

0.5

-0.5

-1

-1.5

-0.5
-2

1.5

Z/D

Z/D

x/D=5

Y /D

1.5

0.5

-0.5

-1

-1.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

x/D=3

12

0.5

-0.5

Z/D

x/D=1

-1

-1.5

Y /D

-0.5
-2

.
) ( ) ( .

CRVP

CRVP and New weak Wake

Y/D
1

0
1

-1

Z/D

) ( ) (
.

13

1
Square

Square

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

0.6

Y/D

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

0.5

U/Vjet

1.5

2.5

2.5

U/Vjet

X/D=1

X/D=3
1

0.8

Square

Square

Rect.

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Comb. Jets

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

0.6

Y/D

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

0.5

1.5

U/Vjet

U/Vjet

X/D=15

X/D=8

.X/D=1, 3, 8, 15 Z/D=0
1

Square

Square

Rect.
Comb. Jets

Rect.

0.8

0.8

Comb. Jets

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

0.6

Y/D

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

0.5

1.5

2.5

2.5

U/Vjet

U/Vjet

X/D=1

X/D=3

1
Square

Square

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

Y/D

0.6

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

U/Vjet

0.5

1.5

U/Vjet

X/D=15

X/D=8

.X/D=1, 3, 8, 15 Z/D=-0.5

14

1
Square

Square

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

Y/D

0.6

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

0.5

U/Vjet

1.5

2.5

2.5

U/Vjet

X/D=1

X/D=3
1

Square

Square
Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Rect.
Comb. Jets

0.8

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate


0.6

Y/D

Y/D

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0
-0.5

0.5

1.5

0
-0.5

2.5

0.5

1.5

U/Vjet

U/Vjet

X/D=8

X/D=8

X/D=1, 3, 8, 15 Z/D=-1.0
1

Square
0.8

Square

Rect.

0.8

0.6

Square
0.8

Rect.

Comb. Jets

Rect.

Comb. Jets

Num. Falt Plate

0.6

Comb. Jets

0.6

Num. Falt Plate

Num. Falt Plate

0.2
0

0.4

U/Vjet

0.4

U/Vjet

U/Vjet

0.4

0.2

0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2
-0.4
-0.6

-0.4
0

10

20

30

-0.4

40

X/D

-0.6

10

20

30

40

-0.6

X/D

10

20

30

X/D

Z/D=0, -0.5, -1.0 )(


0.005

Rect.
Square

0.004

Comb. Jets (This Work)


Num. Flat Plate

0.003

Theory

Cf
0.002

0.001

10

20

30

X/D

15

40

You might also like