Capacity

Building Series
K123456789101112
SECRETARIAT SPECIAL EDITION # 34

Student Voice

Transforming Relationships
Exploring voice,
not a quick fix ...
there is an apprehension
about the almost breathless
popularity of student voice,
with its fashionableness along
with the fact that it has become
so popular that in a climate
of short-termism the interest
may burn out before its transformative potential has been
understood.
Jean Rudduck
(quoted in Fielding 2007)

Internationally, there has been great interest in supporting student voice (Fielding,
2012). Across Canada, projects have been funded at the secondary level to support
increasing opportunities for students to contribute authentically to school improvement.
In Ontario, student voice initiatives have historically acknowledged and tried to foster
the engagement of older students in learning. Student voice in the SPEAKUP initiative,
for example, is about connecting whats happening in the classroom to real-life
experiences outside school, with a focus on supporting students to shape their
learning environment while building skills and abilities and preparing for active
citizenship (http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/students/speakup/).
Provincial collaborative inquiries are leading educators to become more keenly aware
of student voice for younger children as well. They are discovering how competent
and capable of complex thinking children are when when they are deeply involved
in the process of learning (Ontario Early Years Framework, 2013). They are discovering
that student investment in learning opens new possibilities for children of all ages,
not only for learning, but also for engagement and well-being (Natural Curiosity, 2011;
Toshalis, & Nakkula, 2012).
Nonetheless, challenges abound. This monograph, drawing from international and
classroom-based Ontario research, puts the spotlight on both the transformative
potential of student voice for younger children and the challenges that educators
are beginning to work through as they rethink roles and relationships in elementary
education.

September 2013
ISSN: 1913 8482 (Print)
ISSN: 1913 8490 (Online)

support every child

reach every student

The Capacity Building Series is produced by the Student

Achievement Division to support leadership and instructional
effectiveness in Ontario schools. The series is posted at:
www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/.
For information: [email protected]

What are we learning about student voice?

I am something ...
When we started writing this book, I could
show the world that I am something, instead
of just colouring, so thats how it helped
me it made me so proud of myself that
I am actually capable of doing something
and here today, I am doing something,
I can actually show the world that Im not
just a colouring person, I can show you
that I am something.
English Language Learner
School Effectiveness Framework, 2013
(Component 3)

Student
Student voice
voice is
is aa metaphor
metaphor for
for student
student engagement
engagement and
and participation
participation in
in issues
issues that
that
matter
to
learning.
Although
practitioners
agree
that
student
voice
is
important,
there
matter to learning. Although practitioners agree that student voice is important, there
is
is less
less agreement
agreement on
on developmentally
developmentally appropriate
appropriate ways
ways for
for children
children to
to participate
participate
deeply
deeply and
and meaningfully
meaningfully in
in their
their education.
education. What
What might
might student
student participation
participation look
like,
like, sound
sound like
like and
and be,
be, not
not just
just for
for older
older students
students but
but for
for younger
younger students
students as
as well?
well?
As
As educators
educators study
study student
student learning
learning in
in collaborative
collaborative inquiries,
inquiries, they
they are
are observing
observing that
that
children
children express
express voice
voice in
in aa variety
variety of
of ways
ways in
in writing,
writing, art
art and
and drama;
drama; in
in gesture,
gesture,
body
body language
language and
and even
even silence.
silence. In
In this
this sense,
sense, student
student voice
voice is
is not
not something
something that
that
we
grant
to
students,
but
rather
something
we
tap
into.
By
broadening
the
definition
we grant to students, but rather something we tap into. By broadening the
of
of how
how children
children can
can and
and do
do express
express voice,
voice, educators
educators are
are taking
taking diverse
diverse approaches
approaches
to
hearing
student
voice.
The
following
diagram
illustrates
some
of
the
to hearing student voice. The following diagram illustrates some of the ways
ways that
that
students
students may
may express
express their voice.
voice.

Broadening Our Understanding of How Children Express Voice

Are we hearing all the children in the classroom express their thinking about their
learning? Or as Rudduck asks, ... whose voices are heard in the acoustics of the school?

in writing

role play
art

speaking

self-regulation

conversations with peers

sleep

over-erasing

at play

non-compliance
silence

disorganization

drama

aggression

body language
incomplete work
gestures

conversations with
parents at home

A Professional Inquiry into Broadening Conceptions of Voice

How do we tap into students expressions of voice, including gestures, body language and silence?
How do all forms of expression inform planning?

Working through tensions

Developing reciprocal relationships with students, parents and colleagues is critical
for sharing ownership for learning. Many observe that as students are made partners
in decisions about their learning, motivation and perseverance grow, resulting in
new and more in-depth learning (Watkins, 2009). Yet promoting more autonomy for
learners may not be easy to achieve. Fielding, for example, suggests that it requires
a transformation of what it means to be a student; what it means to be a teacher. In
effect, it requires the intermingling and interdependence of both (2004). Partnering
with students to engage them in learning, in other words, calls for a pedagogical
shift what some describe as a shift from teaching to learning (Watkins, 2009).

A rupture of the ordinary ...

Transformation requires a rupture of the
ordinary and this demands as much of
teachers as it does of students.
(Fielding, 2004)

As educators begin to make this shift, some express a tension between teaching the
curriculum and empowering students to become partners in learning. One educator
in a provincial collaborative inquiry put it this way, There are two systems at play
a learning culture versus a grading culture educators feel bound by the curriculum
and guidelines. We support a learning, inquiry-based culture but feel constrained
by mandated curriculum and reporting requirements.
As educators create space for students to have more autonomy in their learning,
they require an environment that is open to risk-taking and provides opportunities to
continually reflect on and persevere through their own learning process what Watkins
(2012) calls a supportive forum for experimentation where educators can talk about
the tensions that emerge from new roles and responsibilities. The following sections
explore how educators across Ontario are taking action to navigate these tensions
by: (1) connecting the whole school community, (2) fostering reciprocal relationships
with students, (3) exploring a pedagogical mindset and (4) co-creating a responsive
learning environment.

CONNECTING THE WHOLE SCHOOL COMMUNITY

While there exists great anticipation in what is possible when we engage students
in their own learning, the challenge remains in hearing the voices of all students.
This goal is best achieved when educators work collaboratively on a whole school
focus on student engagement. Principals play a key role in honouring student voice
and developing a school culture that promotes it.
An environment that supports student voice encompasses more than a classroom;
it is all of the educators and caregivers that students interact with in the school
setting. In the words of Rudduck and Flutter, the principles and values of pupil voice
and participation are threaded through the daily interactions and communications of
school life and reflect a coherent and widely supported set of values and principles
(cited in Fielding, 2007).
The focus on student engagement impacts how school administrators and system
support staff work with classroom educators. It informs all of the work in the school
since for students school is a holistic experience: it is about lessons, it is about
what happens between lessons and it is about the regimes that define who and
what matter to the school (Fielding, 2007).
Schools that have struggled with student engagement and achievement are finding
that utilizing student voice as a whole school approach can shift the culture from a
deficit focus to a growth mindset. In the schools that are exploring student inquiry as
a way to enhance voice and engagement, educators are finding that their students
are more focused and that student learning is exceeding their expectations (Natural
Curiosity, 2011). Further, as students begin to feel more competent and confident,

Discovering voice
... it was our decision as to whether we
wanted to learn or not, it didnt become
something where, its like take notes
from the textbook I dont want to criticize
the textbook, but sometimes thats what
can happen and it takes away the critical
thinking from the idea.

student behaviour is also improving. This cycle of success has led to powerful transformations in classroom practice. In the words of Peacock, Where this culture extends
to the entire school, an exciting can do atmosphere pervades leading to the sense
that almost anything is possible or within reach (2011).

A Professional Inquiry into Defining Values

Make a social network map of the relationships in your school ... does each student have multiple
connections to different caring adults who know and value them as human beings?
What beliefs and values about student voice are widely shared by the members of your school
community?
What school-wide habits and practices routinely communicate these beliefs and values to your students?
What actions can you take to strengthen communication about these beliefs and values?

When you listen to the teacher and you

like oh - I understand what shes going at,
so then you can build on with the teacher
and you can even have a discussion with the
teacher and kind of do a back and forth.
Grade 7/8 students
School Effectiveness Framework, 2013
(Component 4)

FOSTERING RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIPS

Educators are fostering reciprocal relationships with their students by including
them in co-creating learning opportunities, co-designing the learning space and
co-constructing assessment (including assessments of their own learning and the
learning of their peers). They are confirming the view of many researchers in seeing
the value of partnering with their students (Peacock, 2011), recognizing the importance
of ownership in the learning both for themselves and their students. In these reciprocal
relationships, educators are finding ways to include student voice throughout the day.
As educators become more open to student voice, they are finding that they are
learning about their own learning as well. They are adopting a learning stance
that affirms the image of children and teachers as capable, resourceful, powerful
protagonists of their own experience (Wien, 2008). They are opening up spaces and
ways for students to demonstrate their ideas and share their thinking. As educators
collaborate to analyze and discuss next steps in the learning process, they open up
spaces to share ideas and express their own thinking as well.
In building trusting and reciprocal relationships, traditional roles shift. As educators
carefully listen and observe, they are providing responsive guidance rather than
engaging in teaching without attending to listening. Educators are diligently working
to find harmony in this way of working so that they can continually engage and
motivate students. In these relationships, educator and student learning and efficacy
are growing. In the words of an educator participating in a provincial collaborative
inquiry, A shift in the teacher-student relationship occurs when the teacher is listening,
respecting the childs voice. The child talks more and begins to share ideas more
confidently. Finding the balance is critical, and requires ongoing reflection.
Educators are also seeing the value of peer interaction and providing opportunities
for students to work together in various types of groupings so that they can explore
common interests, share various perspectives and build on each others learning.
Again, quoting from an Ontario educator, [They] have learned to trust their students
and trust that when children are given a degree of autonomy over their own learning
they will work and learn, and that the children are capable of learning from each
other (often more effectively than from the teacher). This transformative practice
has seen all of these educators moving toward co-constructing learning with students
and away from teaching students.

A Professional Inquiry into Fostering Reciprocity

Test
Test the
the waters
waters and
and ask
ask aa handful
handful of
of students
students about
about what
what they
they are
are learning.
learning. Ask
Ask aa class
class who
who isis
responsible
responsible for
for learning.
learning. What
What do
do students
students say?
say? (Watkins,
(Watkins, 2009)
2009)

Every child should feel

he or she belongs ...

How
How do
do students
students atat your
your school
school voice
voice their
their thinking
thinking about
about their
their learning
learning and
and other
other school
school issues?
issues?
What
What actions
actions can
can you
you take
take toto give
give students
students more
more opportunities
opportunities toto express
express their
their voice?
voice?

Every child
child should
should feel
feel that
that he
he or
or she
she
Every
belongs, isis aa valuable
valuable contributor
contributor to
to his
his or
or
belongs,
her surroundings,
surroundings, and
and deserves
deserves the
the opportuopportuher
nity to
to succeed.
succeed. When
When we
we recognize
recognize children
children
nity
as capable
capable and
and curious,
curious, we
we are
are more
more likely
likely
as
to deliver
deliver programs
programs and
and services
services that
that value
value
to
and build
build on
on their
their strengths
strengths and
and abilities.
abilities.
and

IfIf you
you expand
expand opportunities
opportunities for
for students
students toto have
have aa stronger
stronger voice
voice inin classroom
classroom and
and school
school learning,
learning,
how
how will
will you
you identify
identify the
the impact
impact of
of this
this action
action on
on student
student learning?
learning?

explORing
EXPLORING A peDAgOgiCAl
PEDAGOGICAL minDSeT
MINDSET
Educators
Educators are
are embracing
embracing a
a pedagogical
pedagogical mindset
mindset to
to address
address the
the tensions
tensions that
that are
are
inherent
inherent when
when embedding
embedding student
student voice
voice within
within the
the curriculum.
curriculum. They
They are
are finding
finding
that
that three
three apsects
apsects of
of aa pedagogical
pedagogical mindset
mindset are
are particularly
particularly helpful
helpful in
in dealing
dealing with
with
these
these tensions
tensions and
and supporting
supporting both
both student
student and
and educator
educator learning.
learning. Each
Each is
is explored
explored
briefly
briefly below.
below.

Ontario Early
Early Years
Years Framework
Framework,, 2013)
2013)
((Ontario

1.
1. Developing
Developing aa Pedagogy
Pedagogy of
of Listening
Listening
Educators
Educators are
are grasping
grasping the
the importance
importance of
of developing
developing aa pedagogy
pedagogy of
of listening
listening
(Gandini,
(Gandini, L.,
L., &
& Kaminsky,
Kaminsky, 2004;
2004; Rinaldi,
Rinaldi, 2004),
2004), where
where they
they spend
spend more
more time
time listening
listening
to
to their
their students
students and
and helping
helping them
them build
build on
on one
one anothers
anothers ideas.
ideas. They
They are
are more
more
than
than ever
ever tuning
tuning into
into the
the diverse
diverse ways
ways that
that students
students are
are expressing
expressing their
their thinking.
thinking.
Listening
Listening to
to students,
students, deeply
deeply and
and authentically,
authentically, requires
requires an
an awareness
awareness of
of our
our biases
biases
and
and preconceptions
preconceptions as
as these
these affect
affect what
what we
we hear.
hear.
Educators
Educators who
who are
are developing
developing aa pedagogy
pedagogy of
of listening
listening to
to inform
inform their
their work
work are
are
seeing
seeing aa dramatic
dramatic impact
impact on
on their
their daily
daily classroom
classroom practice.
practice. As
As one
one Ontario
Ontario educator
educator
commented,
commented, We
We actively
actively listen
listen to
to what
what our
our students
students are
are telling
telling us
us and
and they
they construct
construct
the
the learning
learning with
with us.
us. We
We acknowledge
acknowledge and
and validate
validate their
their questions,
questions, ideas,
ideas, suppositions
suppositions
and
and opinions
opinions and
and provide
provide them
them choice
choice in
in their
their learning.
learning. AA pedagogy
pedagogy of
of listening
listening often
often
includes
includes documenting
documenting evidence
evidence in
in the
the various
various forms
forms that
that make
make student
student thinking
thinking
visible
visible and
and provide
provide aa record
record for
for discussion,
discussion, reflection
reflection and
and analysis.
analysis. This
This process
process is
is
ongoing
ongoing and
and is
is used
used to
to support
support growth
growth and
and improvement
improvement ((Capacity
Capacity Building
Building Series
Series
Pedagogical
Pedagogical Documentation,
Documentation, 2012).
2012).

Educators need
need to
to understand
understand what
what they
they
Educators
can about
about the
the different
different social,
social, economic,
economic,
can
and cultural
cultural contexts
contexts of
of their
their students
students
and
and how
how these
these influence
influence their
their efforts.
efforts. ItIt isis
and
beneficial to
to view
view these
these differences
differences not
not as
as
beneficial
impediments to
to overcome,
overcome, but
but as
as resources
resources
impediments
that can
can enhance
enhance learning.
learning.
that
(Toshalis && Nakkula,
Nakkula, 2012)
2012)
(Toshalis

Diverse
Diverse Approaches
Approaches to
to Hearing
Hearing Student
Student Voice
Voice
silent observation
documentation analysis

Actively Soliciting Student Voice

surveys

photo analysis

interviews
Listening with Ears,
Eyes and Open Minds

mailbox systems

video analysis
anecdotal notes

speakers corner
open door policies

listening and observing

peer-to-peer interactions
in the moment

Tapping into Student Voice: Discovering/Uncovering Voice

exit cards

2. Developing Pedagogical Documentation

Developing inquiring minds ...

You dont all give us the same projects and
we all go off and do that project were all
doing the same project but different things
in that project.

You cant just jump out and say, Oh, Im

going to be a writer and go to your desk
and you cant write anything. You really
have to think about your one idea, think
how its gonna go, you have to plan it out.
Grade 3 Students
School Effectiveness Framework, 2013
(Component 4)

Pedagogical documentation has provided educators with a vehicle for including

student voice in their practice so that feedback can be individualized and precise.
Utilizing a pedagogy of listening, educators are broadening their view of what type of
evidence should be collected and how it can support learning. As one Ontario educator
commented, As the process developed, the educators moved toward more multimodal
evidence. They started to take a greater interest in the nonverbal communication and
exchanges between children instead of just looking at individual children.
Pedagogical documentation can encourage partnerships to support peer and and
student self-assessments. As one team of Ontario educators discovered, In response
to the documentation, quiet students suddenly had more to show and share, providing
more insight into their learning. As educators document student learning, they are
able to see and hear students in an authentic way and arrive at a fuller picture
of their learning. Further, as they engage in documentation, they are realizing that
their students often have more knowledge and skills than they thought. As one Ontario
educator observed, We engage in student-based planning, related to the curriculum,
rather than curriculum-based planning alone (know your students). The triangulation
of evidence, especially observations and conversations, play a critical role for planning
with students in mind.
Evidence relating to the student experience in classrooms is the catalyst as well for
changes in educators actions, practice and understanding. Student experience becomes
the subject of professional learning engaging teachers in observation, analysis and
responsive interaction with students. Students feel their ideas are valued, helping
them to build confidence and a growth mindset about their own learning over
time (Dweck, 2006).

3. Developing a Pedagogy of Inquiry

As educators use inquiry approaches to provide students with opportunities to work with
their strengths and pursue ideas and interests they are passionate about, they are
putting learners in the driving seat (Watkins, 2009). As they partner with students
to negotiate learning and to promote learner autonomy (Watkins, Carnell, & Lodge,
2007), they are confirming what researchers have found for secondary students
namely, that when elementary students feel more ownership for their learning, they
become more engaged and more likely to persevere to overcome challenges.
Educators are looking at new ways of designing daily learning opportunities for students
as well as developing long-range plans. As they look to their students interests,
strengths and ideas for the co-creation of learning opportunities, they realize that
for engagement and authentic learning to take place, they must be responsive to
the students voices in these areas. Educators who utilize this approach have seen
how effectively student inquiries can be embedded in the curriculum, particularly
in integrated and real world ways. In the words of an Ontario educator, We are
learning that students have ideas that they want to pursue, and that they have
capacity to work together to complete tasks and express themselves, so we are
working in ways to give them voice, audiences for their activity and guidance in
responsive ways.

A Professional Inquiry into Shifting the Pedagogical Mindset

In the last week, name a moment when students were deeply engaged in their learning. Consider
all the possibilities ...
Analyze your school teams response to a recent situation in which student voice was evident
what are the implications of this analysis? What belief and values about student voice are evident
from this analysis?
What are the discrepancies between this analysis and your beliefs about the importance/value of
student voice? If you recognize discrepancies between what you believe about student voice and
what you do, what listening and observing practices can you implement to reduce this discrepancy?

CO-CREATING A RESPONSIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

We need to build our classrooms around the voices in the room.
Upon reflection, we realized that student voice is much more than their recording
on an app and describing their learning, its on the walls of our classroom, its in
the co-construction of the physical layout and most evident in the inquiry work.

When all students feel

included ...
It is important that teachers create an
environment that will foster a sense of
community, where all students feel included
and appreciated and where their perspectives are treated with respect. One way of
accomplishing this is for teachers to select
topics, resources, and examples that reflect
the diversity in the classroom.
(Social Studies, Grades 1 to 6,
revised 2013)

Educators, Provincial Collaborative Inquiries

A caring, safe and healthy environment creates a space for students to express their
voice in a way that supports their learning and well-being. In partnerships with students,
educators are realizing the potential of the environment to be a third teacher
one that is responsive to student interests, provide[s] opportunities for children to
make their thinking visible and then foster[s] learning and engagement (Fraser, &
Gestwicki, 2012).
When educators listen to student voice and use it to co-create the learning environment,
students feel they are an integral part of a learning community, that they matter and
that they have something of value to offer (Fielding, 2007). This empowers them
to take responsibility for their own learning, and that of others, and to take risks
and explore new ideas. According to Shanker, taking responsibility for learning and
that of others is the most authentic opportunity that students can have to develop
self-regulation in the classroom (2013).
In an environment where educators listen, capture and are responsive to student
voice, they have noticed that students believe they are capable and competent to
learn. The diagram below illustrates what children may Do, Feel and Be when
they are in a responsive learning environment.

What Students May Do, Feel and Be When in a Responsive

Learning Environment

Do

participate in issues
that matter to them
shape and contribute
to their learning
environment
belong in meaningful
partnerships

Feel

learner autonomy
agency
self-efficacy
collective efficacy
respect
belonging
motivated
connected to their
environment

Be

in the driver seat of

their own learning
self-regulator
curious
an active citizen
engaged

envisioning Student Voice

You may wish to use this graphic to describe and discuss the types of interactions you have with students and to envision the
possibilities in terms of student partnerships!

Shared Leadership

Partnership

Students take a lead role in

identifying issues to be
pursued and the educator
supports by naming
the learning.

Participation
Consultation

Educators look beyond

student work to student
engagement and invite
student discussion and
dialogue about learning.

Expression

Students are co-leaders of

learning and accept mutual
responsibility for planning,
assessment of learning
and responsive actions.

Student involvement in
planning, decision making
and implementation is key.

Educators use information

about student progress and
well-being to inform teaching
decisions.

Informed by Ontario collaborative inquiry participants and by the work of Michael Fielding (2012), Beyond Student Voice: Patterns of Partnership and the
Demands of Deep Democracy; Eric Toshalis & Michael J. Nakkula (2012), Motivation, Engagement and Student Voice; Roger Hart (1992). Childrens participation
from tokenism to citizenship.

References and Related Reading

Dweck, C.
C. S.
S. (2006).
(2006). Mindset:
Dweck,
Mindset: The
The new
new psychology
psychology
of success.
success. How
How we
we can
of
can learn
learn to
to fulfill
fulfill our
our potential
potential..
New York:
York: Random
Random House.
New
House.
Fielding, M.
M. (2012).
(2012). Beyond
Fielding,
Beyond student
student voice:
voice: Patterns
Patterns
of partnership
partnership and
and the
the demands
of
demands of
of deep
deep democracy
democracy
[Ms all
all de
de la
la voz
voz del
[Ms
del alumnado:
alumnado: patrones
patrones de
de
colaboracin yy las
las exigencias
exigencias de
colaboracin
de la
la democracia
democracia
profunda]. Revista
Revista de
de Educacin
profunda].
Educacin,, 359,
359, 4565.
4565.
Fielding, M.
M. (2007).
(2007). Jean
Fielding,
Jean Rudduck
Rudduck (19372007).
(19372007).
Carving aa new
new order
order of
Carving
of experience:
experience: A
A preliminary
preliminary
appreciation of
of the
the work
appreciation
work of
of Jean
Jean Rudduck
Rudduck in
in the
the
field of
of student
student voice.
voice. Education
field
Education Action
Action Research
Research,,
323336
323336
Fielding, M.
M. (2004).
(2004). Transformative
Fielding,
Transformative approaches
approaches
to student
student voice:
voice: Theoretical
Theoretical underpinnings,
to
underpinnings,
recalcitrant realities.
realities. British
recalcitrant
British Educational
Educational Research
Research
Journal,30(2), 295311.
295311.
Journal,30(2),
Fraser, S.,
S., &
& Gestwicki,
Gestwicki, C.
Fraser,
C. (2012).
(2012). Authentic
Authentic childchildhood: Experiencing
Experiencing Reggio
hood:
Reggio Emilia
Emilia in
in the
the classroom
classroom..
Delmar &
& Thomson
Thomson Learning.
Delmar
Learning.
Gandini,
L.,
& Kaminsky,
Kaminsky, J.J. A.
Gandini, L., &
A. (2004).
(2004). Reflections
Reflections
on the
the relationship
relationship between
on
between documentation
documentation and
and
assessment
in
the
American
context:
AN
assessment in the American context: AN INTERVIEW
INTERVIEW
WITH BRENDA
BRENDA FYFE.
FYFE. Innovations
WITH
Innovations in
in Early
Early Education:
Education:
The International
International Reggio
Reggio Exchange
The
Exchange,, 11(11),
11(11), 517.
517.
Hart, R.
R. (1992).
(1992). Childrens
Childrens participation
Hart,
participation from
from
tokenism to
to citizenship.
citizenship. Florence:
tokenism
Florence: UNICEF
UNICEF Innocenti
Innocenti
Research Centre.
Centre. www.freechild.org/ladder.htm
www.freechild.org/ladder.htm
Research

Natural
Natural Curiosity:
Curiosity: Building
Building childrens
childrens understanding
understanding
of
of the
the world
world through
through environmental
environmental inquiry/A
inquiry/A
resource
resource for
for teachers
teachers.. (2011).
(2011). Toronto:
Toronto: The
The
Laboratory
Laboratory School
School at
at the
the Dr.
Dr. Eric
Eric Jackman
Jackman Institute
Institute
of
of Child
Child Study.
Study.
Peacock,
Peacock, A.
A. (2011).
(2011). Beyond
Beyond Assessment
Assessment Levels:
Levels:
Reaching
Reaching for
for new
new heights
heights in
in primary
primary education.
education.
Education
Education Review
Review,, 23(2),
23(2), 1422.
1422.
Rinaldi,
Rinaldi, C.
C. (2004).
(2004). The
The relationship
relationship between
between
documentation
documentation and
and assessment.
assessment. The
The Quarterly
Quarterly
Periodical
Periodical of
of the
the North
North American
American Reggio
Reggio Emilia
Emilia
Alliance
Alliance,, 11(1).
11(1).
Shanker,
Shanker, S.
S. (2013).
(2013). Calm,
Calm, alert,
alert, and
and learning:
learning:
Classroom
Classroom strategies
strategies for
for self-regulation
self-regulation.. Toronto,
Toronto,
ON:
ON: Pearson
Pearson Canada.
Canada.
Toshalis,
Toshalis, E.,
E., &
& Nakkula,
Nakkula, M.
M. J.J. (2012).
(2012). Motivation,
Motivation,
Engagement,
Engagement, and
and Student
Student Voice.
Voice. The
The Education
Education
Digest
Digest,, 2935
2935
Watkins,
Watkins, C.
C. (2009)
(2009) Learners
Learners in
in the
the driving
driving seat.
seat.
Leading
Leading Learning
Learning Pedagogy
Pedagogy,, 1(2),
1(2), 2831.
2831.
www.teachingtimes.com.
www.teachingtimes.com.
Watkins,
Watkins, C.,
C., Carnell,
Carnell, E.,
E., && Lodge,
Lodge, C.
C. (2007).
(2007). Effective
Effective
learning
learning in
in classrooms
classrooms.. Thousand
Thousand Oaks,
Oaks, CA:
CA: Sage
Sage
Publications.
Publications.
Wien,
Wien, C.
C. (2008).
(2008). Emergent
Emergent curriculum
curriculum in
in the
the
primary
primary classroom
classroom.. New
New York:
York: Teachers
Teachers College
College
Press.
Press.

Ontario
Ontario Ministry
ministry of
of Education
educationResources
Resources
Curriculum
Documents
Curriculum Documents
The
The Ontario
Ontario Curriculum:
Curriculum: The
TheArts
Arts(revised)
(revised)(2009)
(2009)
The
The Ontario
Ontario Curriculum:
Curriculum: Social
SocialStudies,
Studies,Grades
Grades11
to
to 66 && History
History and
and Geography,
Geography,Grades
Grades77and
and88
(revised)
(revised) (2013)
(2013)
Ontario
Ontario Early
Early Years
Years Framework
Framework(2013)
(2013)
School
School Effectiveness
Effectiveness Framework
Framework(2013)
(2013)
Capacity
Capacity Building
Building Series
Series
Getting
Started
Getting Started with
with Student
StudentInquiry
Inquiry(2011)
(2011)
Student
Student Identity
Identity and
and Engagement
Engagement(2011)
(2011)
The
The Third
Third Teacher
Teacher (2012)
(2012)
Pedagogical
Pedagogical Documentation
Documentation(2012)
(2012)
Provincial
provincial Collaborative
Collaborative Inquiry
inquiry
Student
Voice
Student Voice has
hasquoted
quotededucators
educatorsparticipating
participating
in
in the
the following:
following:
Collaborative
Collaborative Inquiry
Inquiryin
inLearning
LearningMathematics
Mathematics
(CIL-M)
(CIL-M)
Early
Early Primary
Primary Collaborative
CollaborativeInquiry
Inquiry(EPCI)
(EPCI)
Literacy
Literacy Leaders
Leaders
Student
Student Work
Work Study
StudyTeacher
Teacher(SWST)
(SWST)