Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 115 views

    Volcano Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-280655930
    This document outlines categories and criteria for evaluating presentations. It provides descriptors for awarding marks from 1-4 in each of 12 categories: content accuracy, sequencing of information, originality, background, text formatting, effectiveness, spelling and grammar, cooperation, and referencing. The highest marks of 3-4 are for presentations that meet all criteria in a category, such as having fully accurate content and logical sequencing of information. Lower marks of 1-2 are for presentations that are missing key elements or have inaccuracies in a category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Volcano Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-280655930
    115 views2 pages
    This document outlines categories and criteria for evaluating presentations. It provides descriptors for awarding marks from 1-4 in each of 12 categories: content accuracy, sequencing of information, originality, background, text formatting, effectiveness, spelling and grammar, cooperation, and referencing. The highest marks of 3-4 are for presentations that meet all criteria in a category, such as having fully accurate content and logical sequencing of information. Lower marks of 1-2 are for presentations that are missing key elements or have inaccuracies in a category.

    Original Title

    volcano rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines categories and criteria for evaluating presentations. It provides descriptors for awarding marks from 1-4 in each of 12 categories: content accuracy, sequencing of information, originality, background, text formatting, effectiveness, spelling and grammar, cooperation, and referencing. The highest marks of 3-4 are for presentations that meet all criteria in a category, such as having fully accurate content and logical sequencing of information. Lower marks of 1-2 are for presentations that are missing key elements or have inaccuracies in a category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    115 views2 pages

    Volcano Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-280655930
    This document outlines categories and criteria for evaluating presentations. It provides descriptors for awarding marks from 1-4 in each of 12 categories: content accuracy, sequencing of information, originality, background, text formatting, effectiveness, spelling and grammar, cooperation, and referencing. The highest marks of 3-4 are for presentations that meet all criteria in a category, such as having fully accurate content and logical sequencing of information. Lower marks of 1-2 are for presentations that are missing key elements or have inaccuracies in a category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    CATEGORY

    4 marks

    3 marks

    2 marks

    1 mark

    Content Accuracy

    All content
    throughout the
    presentation is
    accurate. There are
    no factual errors.

    Most of the content


    is accurate but
    there is one piece of
    information that
    might be
    inaccurate.

    The content is
    generally accurate,
    but one piece of
    information is
    clearly flawed or
    inaccurate.

    Content is
    typically
    confusing or
    contains more
    than one factual
    error.

    Sequencing
    of
    Information

    Information is
    organized in a clear,
    logical way. It is
    easy to anticipate
    the type of material
    that might be on
    the next page.

    Most information is
    organized in a clear,
    logical way. One
    page or item of
    information seems
    out of place.

    Some information is
    logically sequenced.
    An occasional page
    or item of
    information seems
    out of place.

    There is no clear
    plan for the
    organization of
    information.

    Originality

    Presentation shows
    considerable
    originality and
    inventiveness. The
    content and ideas
    are presented in a
    unique and
    interesting way.

    Presentation shows
    some originality and
    inventiveness. The
    content and ideas
    are presented in an
    interesting way.

    Presentation shows
    an attempt at
    originality and
    inventiveness on 12 pages.

    Presentation is a
    rehash of other
    people's ideas
    and shows very
    little attempt at
    original thought.

    Background

    Background does
    not detract from
    text or other
    graphics. Choice of
    background is
    consistent from
    page to page and is
    appropriate for the
    topic.

    Background does
    not detract from
    text or other
    graphics. Choice of
    background is
    consistent from
    page to page.

    Background does
    not detract from
    text or other
    graphics.

    Background
    makes it difficult
    to see text or
    competes with
    other graphics on
    the page.

    Text - Font
    Choice &
    Formatting

    Font formats (e.g.,


    colour, bold, italic)
    have been carefully
    planned to enhance
    readability and
    content.

    Font formats have


    been carefully
    planned to enhance
    readability.

    Font formatting has


    been carefully
    planned to
    complement the
    content. It may be a
    little hard to read.

    Font formatting
    makes it very
    difficult to read
    the material.

    Project includes
    most material
    needed to gain a
    comfortable
    understanding of
    the material but is
    lacking one or two
    key elements.

    Project is missing
    more than two key
    elements.

    Project is lacking
    several key
    elements and has
    major
    inaccuracies.

    Effectiveness Project includes all

    material needed to
    gain a comfortable
    understanding of
    the topic.

    Spelling and Presentation has no Presentation has 1-2 Presentation has 1-2 Presentation has
    misspellings or
    misspellings, but no grammatical errors more than 2
    Grammar
    grammatical errors. grammatical errors. but no misspellings. grammatical
    and/or spelling
    errors.

    Cooperation

    Group delegates
    tasks and shares
    responsibility
    effectively all of the
    time.

    Group delegates
    tasks and shares
    responsibility
    effectively most of
    the time.

    Group delegates
    tasks and shares
    responsibility
    effectively some of
    the time.

    Group often is not


    effective in
    delegating tasks
    and/or sharing
    responsibility.

    Referencing

    All the sources are


    given credit
    somewhere in the
    presentation.

    Sources are
    Some sources have No referencing.
    documented in the not been
    presentation with
    referenced.
    one or two
    references missing.

    You might also like