Scribd
Upload
37 views3 pages

Results and Discussions: 4.1 Simulation Parameters

This document discusses the simulation parameters and results of a study comparing DWT-based and FFT-based WiBro models. It provides the simulation parameters used, including the software, modulation type, bandwidth, and frame details. It then shows the DWT-based WiBro model architecture and compares its bit error rate performance to the conventional FFT-based WiMAX model, finding the DWT-based model has a lower bit error rate.

Uploaded by

apecevsb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views3 pages

Results and Discussions: 4.1 Simulation Parameters

This document discusses the simulation parameters and results of a study comparing DWT-based and FFT-based WiBro models. It provides the simulation parameters used, including the software, modulation type, bandwidth, and frame details. It then shows the DWT-based WiBro model architecture and compares its bit error rate performance to the conventional FFT-based WiMAX model, finding the DWT-based model has a lower bit error rate.

Uploaded by

apecevsb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS


4.1 Simulation Parameters:

System
Paramete
rs

Items

Value

Software Used

Matlab R14

Modulation

OFDM

Multiple Access

OFDMA

Duplex

Time Division Duplex

Bandwidth

8.447 MHz

Sample rate

10 MHz

DWT size

1024

The number of sub-carriers


used

864

The number of sub-carriers for


data

768

The number of sub-carriers for


pilot

96

Sub-carrier spacing

9.766 kHz

Effective symbol duration

102.4 s

Cyclic Prefix

12.8 s

OFDM symbol duration

115.2 s

TDD frame length

5 ms

The number of OFDM symbols


in a frame

42

Frequency Bands

Table 4.1 Simulation Parameters

2300-2400 MHz

4.2 Simulated WiBro Model:

Figure 4.1 DWT based WiBro model


Figure 4.1 Shows DWT based WiBro model architecture and it is compared with
conventional FFT based WiMAX model. The Bit Error rate is calculated for both the
model and it shows DWT based is performed well in compare to FFT based model for a
given Signal to Noise ratio.

4.3 Bit Error Rate Calculation

Figure 4.2 Comparison of BER between DWT and FFT based model.
Figure 4.2 shows the comparison of Bit Error Rate between DWT based and the FFT based
Model. The BER is reduced to considerable amount in DWT based WiBro model when
compared to Conventional FFT based model for a same Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR).

You might also like