Thematic study
TM
SECTOR: ENGI14
February 2001
TM
A Study on Wealth Creation 1995 - 2000
The Biggest . . .
RANK
THE
BASED
BIGGEST
ON SIZE
WEALTH
APPRE-
CREATED
CIATION
IN RS CR
(NO. OF
('95 TO '00)
TIMES)
124710.1
219.9
Wipro
Infosys Technologies
58265.0
149.9
Hindustan Lever
45363.0
4.4
Zee Telefilms
38224.8
47.5
Satyam Computer Services
24675.8
126.4
Reliance Industries
20442.2
2.4
Reliance Petroleum
19225.5
2.6
Information Technologies
17373.0
86.9
ITC
11048.6
2.6
Himachal Futuristic Comm.
10990.1
15.7
CAGR % OF
APPRE-
ADJUSTED
CIATION
MKT. CAP.
(NO OF
('95 TO '00)
TIMES)
10
The Fastest . . .
MOST
THE
INQUIRE FASTEST
RANK
SSI
194.6
221.7
Wipro
194.1
219.9
Infosys Technologies
172.4
149.9
Satyam Computer Services
163.2
126.4
Information Technologies
144.2
86.9
PSI Data Systems
134.8
71.3
Cyberspace Infosys
127.3
60.7
Gramophone Co. of India
122.1
54.1
Trigyn Technologies
121.4
53.2
Zee Telefilms
116.5
47.5
10
Accelerated growth in New Economy
companies combined with faster recognition
of business by stock markets have led to
disproportionate returns in a short period.
In euphoric times, investors focus on price
of the share rather than price of the
company.
86% of the wealth created by multi-baggers
has been due to P/E re-rating.
High growth business, which is run by an
outstanding management and purchased
with a five year pay-back outlook of <1, has
a good chance of being a big winner.
Abhay Kantak +91 22 2071379;
[email protected] Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd., 81-82, Bajaj Bhawan, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 Tel: +91 22 281 2500 Fax: 281 6161
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Contents
Objective, Concept & Methodology
The Wealth Creator Group Vs BSE Sensex
Wealth Creators ~ Business Analysis
5-6
Wealth Creators ~ Business Economics
Wealth Creators ~ New Economy Vs Old Economy
Old and New Economy ~ DuPont Analysis
Speed of Wealth Creation
9-10
Characteristics of Multi-Baggers
11-15
Appendix I ~ Wealth Creators
16-17
Appendix II ~ Wealth Creators
(Alphabetically listed)
Appendix III ~ Summation of Earnings
February 2001
18-19
20
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Objective, Concept & Methodology
Objective
In the period from 1995 to 2000, market capitalisation for the top 100 Wealth Creators
has increased by Rs5.15 lakh crores while the entire market capitalisation increased by
Rs3.41 lakh crores. The period of 1995-2000 has thus seen dramatic wealth creation in
one segment of the market and equally dramatic destruction in rest of the market. This
is mainly due to the spectacular performance of 10 companies, which have grown at a
CAGR of 100%+ over the same period. SSI, Wipro, Infosys and Satyam have grown
over 125 times. We undertook to study the characteristics of these multi-baggers so that
we are better prepared to capitalise on such opportunities in future.
As Phil Fisher rightly says, It seems logical that even before thinking of buying any common stocks,
the first step is to see how money has been most successfully made in the past. On another occasion,
he says that stock market is filled with individuals who know the price of everything but the value of
nothing.
Wealth Creation studies are attempts to study the past as a guide to the future and gain
insights into the valuation of such successful opportunities.
Concept
Wealth Creation is the process by which a company enhances the market value of
capital entrusted to it by its shareholders. It is a basic measure of success for any
commercial venture. Wealth Creation is achieved by rational actions of a company in a
sustained manner.
Methodology
For the purpose of our study*, we have identified the top 100 Wealth Creators for the
period 1995-2000 in the Indian stock market. These companies have the distinction of
having added at least Rs100cr to their market capitalisation over this period, after adjusting
for dilution. We have termed the group the MOSt-Inquire 100 Wealth Creators. The
ranks have been accorded on the basis of Speed of Wealth Creation i.e., compounded
growth in Wealth Created over the period of study.
* The database used for this study is that of Capitaline Ol and Trends.
February 2001
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
The Wealth Creator Group Vs BSE Sensex
This study pertains to the period from April '95 to March 2000. During this period, the
BSE Sensex has risen from 3661 to 5001, a rise of 8.9% CAGR. The chart below
presents the relative performance of the 'MOSt-Inquire 100' vs the BSE Sensex during
this period. The 'MOSt-Inquire 100' has demonstrated a 923% out-performance to the
market during this period.
WEALTH CREATOR GROUP VS BSE SENSEX (31/03/95 TO 31/03/00)
TREND
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
Wealth Creator Group
F31/03/00
0
1589
H
1646
L
1526
C
1569
V
923
V 144934
400
200
1250
1000
750
500
250
BSE Sensex = 100
O
H
L
C
1036
1073
995
1023
ITEM
MAR-95
MAR-96
MAR-97
MAR-98
MAR-99
MAR-00
BSE SENSEX
3261.0
3366.6
3360.9
3892.8
3740.0
5001.3
3.2
(0.2)
15.8
(3.9)
33.7
y-o-y Performance (%)
Wealth Creators Index
y-o-y Performance (%)
101.6
85.0
84.1
137.1
402.4
1569.0
(16.4)
(1.0)
63.0
193.5
289.9
5 year CAGR (%) Sensex
8.9
5 year CAGR (%) Wealth Creators
72.9
Re-rating in FY99 has been absolutely astounding. 80% of the wealth created by
MOSt -Inquire 100 has been made in 1999-2000. In the first two years of the period, it
lost 16% of the purchase price. Again, Phil Fisher very appropriately says if big profits
are to be made out of investment, one needs patience, for it is easier to tell what will happen to the price
of a stock than how much time will elapse before it happens".
February 2001
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Wealth Creators ~ Business Analysis
I
Nature of Business
The 1995-2000 Study on Wealth Creation suggests that emergence of infotech companies as
the fastest Wealth Creators is further reinforced. The number of infotech companies among
the ten fastest wealth creators in 1995-2000 is eight as compared to just three in 1993-1998.
Media firms have bagged the remaining two slots.
Apart from infotech companies, the markets seem to reward other superior businesses
that continue to create wealth for shareholders. Pharma and FMCG constitute 29% of
the group.
(Rs Crore)
INDUSTRY
NET
CLASSIFICATION
I.T.
NO CONTR. TO
ROCE
ROCE
5 YEAR CAGR %
WEALTH
OF
WEALTH
2000
1995
CREATORS
COS.
CREATED %
(%)
(%)
NP
SALES
2,68,724
27
54.0
23.7
22.1
48.9
38.4
FMCG
71,899
15
14.4
39.3
30.6
31.4
21.3
Petrochem
39,668
8.0
13.8
19.0
17.7
28.2
Media
39,260
7.9
7.9
38.7
42.9
26.2
Telecom
32,866
6.6
23.8
48.4
27.8
16.2
Pharma
24,032
14
4.8
21.5
21.9
17.5
17.8
Automobiles
6,751
1.4
24.3
22.6
29.0
22.0
Metals
3,872
0.8
17.9
12.7
10.8
16.5
Banking & Finance
2,593
0.5
12.7
13.8
22.2
21.5
Cement
1,430
0.3
22.6
18.6
31.8
21.3
Consumer Durable
452
0.1
19.3
18.9
18.4
17.7
Elect. / Engineering
308
0.1
29.8
12.1
78.6
18.7
Chemicals
250
0.1
18.5
48.2
43.0
30.1
Others
5,632
13
1.1
16.8
21.3
23.7
30.5
TOTAL
4,97,734
100
100.0
19.5
20.7
25.3
22.1
Note: 1. For Wipro only the software business is taken into account.
2. Sales and Net Profits of Digital and Fujitsu are not taken for five years CAGR calculation.
3. For any Ratio Calculation, Reliance Petroleum Is excluded from the list.
II Business Activity
The common thread through all the Wealth Creation Studies including the current one is
that companies, which have consistently created wealth for their shareholders, have
adopted an extremely focussed business policy.
BUSINESS ACTIVITY 2000
February 2001
BUSINESS ACTIVITY 1999
Diversified
Diversified
5%
4%
Focussed
Focussed
95%
96%
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Wealth Creators ~ Business Analysis (Contd.)
III Product Attribute
All successful Wealth Creating companies have erected high entry barriers through
technological advantage or strong brand-building. These two factors are mainly responsible
for the inclusion of 83% of the MOSt-Inquire 100 group. Commodity companies on
the other hand, are represented inconsistently, thus reiterating that commodity businesses
do not create wealth on a consistent basis.
PRODUCT ATTRIBUTE 2000
PRODUCT ATTRIBUTE 1999
Commodity
Technology
17%
36%
Commodity
Technology
14%
26%
Brands
47%
Brands
60%
Wealth Creators ~ Business Economics
Wealth Creation is concurrent with overall improvement in the economics of a business.
Companies (from the Most-Inquire 100) with an RoCE of over 25% in 2000
constitute 45% of the total group as compared to 39% in 1995.
Improvement in business economics can be seen from the fact that the number of
companies with RoCE of less than 20% has reduced from 47 in 1995 to 43 in 2000.
WEALTH CREATORS BUSINESS ROCE
Year end
2000
13
14
1999
13
13
1998
16
1997
11
12
21
12
23
1995
11
27
<10%
10-15%
10
12
27
20
14
15-20%
22
11
13
40
29
14
23
1996
32
12
19
16
20
13
12
19
February 2001
16
24
15
60
20-25%
CMYK
24
80
25-30%
100
>30%
Wealth Creation Study
Wealth Creators ~ New Economy Vs Old Economy
We have classified companies in technology, media and telecom sectors as new economy
companies and the rest as old economy companies. The polarisation between new
economy companies and old economy companies seems to have reached its peak in
the 1995-2000 Study of Wealth Creation.
OLD
Number of Companies in Inquire-MOSt 100
NEW
62
38
Earnings CAGR (%) (1995-2000)
22.2
38.7
Market Cap CAGR (%)
28.1
98.8
PE 1995
17.8
20.2
PE 2000
22.6
122.4
Earnings of new economy companies has grown at a CAGR of 38.7% as compared
to 22.2% of old economy companies.
Earnings growth rate for the new economy companies is 1.74x that of old economy
companies.
The sharp contrast in earnings growth rates has led to new economy companies
getting higher discounting. The PE multiple of new economy stocks has expanded
from 20.2x in 1995 to 122.4x in 2000 while that of old economy companies has
expanded from 17.8x to 22.6x along the same period.
February 2001
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Old and New Economy ~ DuPont Analysis
Net Profit/Sales
New economy companies have been successful in improving their NPM quite significantly
during 1995-2000. The NPM of the new economy companies has risen from 9.8% in
1995 to 18.4% in 2000 while that for old economy companies has been sluggish.
NP/SALES (%)
18
14
13.3
Old
New
14.1
11.8
12.1
11.6
13.2
9.8
10.1
10.4
14.3
17.7
18.4
10
6
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Asset Turnover Ratio
Cash-positive nature of the businesses and capital issues has pulled down the asset turnover
ratios of new economy companies.
ASSET TURNOVER RATIO
3
2
Old
New
1.97
1.77
1.32
1.24
1.16
0.79
0.86
0.89
0.90
0.84
0.88
0.87
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Asset/Equity Ratio (Leverage)
New economy companies have lower incidence of debt on their balance sheets due to
which their asset/equity ratio has gradually declined. In comparison, old economy
companies have increasingly resorted to debt for funding.
ASSET/EQUITY RATIO
3
2
Old
New
1.56
1.50
1.69
1.95
1.95
1.97
1.35
1.33
1.27
1.22
1.12
1.06
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
February 2001
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Speed of Wealth Creation
Wealth has been created at a faster pace. The average speed of the top 10 Wealth
Creators of this study is superior to that of the previous study by 1.58x. What is more
glaring is that all of the top 10 Wealth Creators of this year's study have delivered more
than 100% appreciation y-o-y.
PERFORMANCE OF
1991-96
1992-97
1993-98
1994-99
1995-00
82.8
42.4
62.7
94.4
139.5
45.0
50.7
72.0
73.6
69.0
TOP 10 WEALTH CREATORS
Fastest Wealth Creators
(Top 10) 5 year Mcap. CAGR (%)
Fastest Wealth Creators
(Top 10) 5 year Earnings CAGR (%)
Does it mean that we have come to an age of very rapid Wealth Creation process in the
stock market? If so, why? We think that there may be some amount of 'bubble' factor,
but we are sure that the following things are taking place:
1. Earnings of the corporation more particularly in the new economy are
growing faster.
As per Michael J. Mauboussin and Alexander Schay, the period of excess return for an
individual company, which is known as Competitive Advantage Period (CAP), is
shortening due to rapid pace of innovation. In plain language, this means that the valuation
of fast changing industries should be lower, all things being equal, than the more stable
industries. But here is the twist. We see knowledge-based market leaders achieving higherthan-ever economic returns. This substantiates their higher valuation.
Earlier, the market could reasonably assume that a company can sustain its franchise for
a long time. Such an assumption is, however, unrealistic now.
The World As It Was
Excess Returns
Excess Returns
Competitive Advantage
The World As It Is
High Excess Returns
Short CAPS
Low Excess Returns
Long CAPS
Times
February 2001
Times
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Speed of Wealth Creation
2. The speed at which the stock market recognises business success is increasing
everyday.
The reasons are:
(i) Information Technology allows rapid information dissemination.
(ii) The quantum of investible funds has increased tremendously more because of
opening up of the markets
(iii) Ease of execution and settlement, particularly in India.
Accelerated profit generation in new economy stocks and rapid recognition of business
successes by stock market indicate, in our view, the following state of Wealth Creation in
stock markets:
The Stock Market As It Was
The Stock Market As It Is
Excess Returns
Excess Returns
FASTER WEALTH CREATION
Low Excess Returns
Over Mean Rate For a
Long Period
Hyper Excess Returns
Over Mean Rate For a
Short Period
Times
Times
February 2001
10
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Characteristics of Multi-Baggers
Keeping the above fundamental trends in mind, we decided to explore the characteristics
of 10 multi-baggers in detail. In our opinion, multi-baggers are those companies which
have created wealth at a CAGR of 100%+ during the period from 1995 to 2000. What
are those characteristics?
It has to be a growth story
Total wealth created by 100 companies is Rs4,97,734cr.
About 80% (Rs3,97,120cr) of Wealth Creation is by companies with a CAGR of
25%+ in the period from 1995 to 2000.
Top 10 companies, which have appreciated by over 100% every year, have achieved
earnings growth ranging from 43% to 180% every year and the only exception is
Gramophone Company of India.
Average rate of profit growth of top 10 companies has been 62.8%
(Median: 69%).
Business has to have strong tail-wind
Favourable external environment should continue for a long period of time. Basically
Competitive Advantage Period (CAP) should continue for a long period.
Sales growth of top 10 multi-baggers has been 36.4% during 1995-2000
(Median: 44.7%).
Size of the business opportunity has to be very big
All the top 10 companies are pertaining to software and media.
The market size of the software services industry is estimated at upwards of $300b.
It is growing at 10-15% every year. India
s exports are just about $6b and the
competitive advantage of Indian companies is probably the highest in the world.
Media business is also witnessing rapid growth all over the world and the opportunity,
though not quantified, is supposed to be very big.
These external opportunities are over and above huge domestic potential.
Global market orientation
Most of the money has been made by companies that have exported their products.
Export revenue Vs domestic revenue of top 10 companies is 61:39.
All of the top 24 Wealth Creators belong to the software services sector. Their
exports:domestic ratio is 55:45. This, apparently, is the first prize of globalisation
for India.
February 2001
11
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Great business economics
INDUSTRY
NO.OF
CONTR.TO
ROCE (%)
NP 5YR.
SALES 5YR
COS
WEAL.CR.%
2000
1995
CAGR %
CAGR %
I.T.
27
54.0
23.7
22.1
48.9
38.4
FMCG
15
14.4
39.3
30.6
31.4
21.3
Pharma
14
4.8
21.5
21.9
17.5
17.8
Telecom
6.6
23.8
48.4
27.8
16.2
Automobiles
1.4
24.3
22.6
29.0
22.0
Metals
0.8
17.9
12.7
10.8
16.5
Banking & Finance
0.5
12.7
13.8
22.2
21.5
Conumer Durables
0.1
19.3
18.9
18.4
17.7
Petrochem
8.0
13.8
19.0
17.7
28.2
Media
7.9
7.9
38.7
42.9
26.2
Cement
0.3
22.6
18.6
31.8
21.3
Elect. / Engineering
0.1
29.8
12.1
78.6
18.7
Chemicals
0.1
18.5
48.2
43.0
30.1
Others
13
1.1
16.8
21.3
23.7
30.5
TOTAL
100
100.0
19.5
20.7
25.3
22.1
CLASSIFICATION
ROCE (%)
54% of the Wealth Created has been by a single sector i.e., IT.
IT business thrust has been on Indian cost, American value and no corporate tax.
This puts Indian software companies at a huge sustainable advantage in terms of
cost over and above superior technical skills.
A company should be purchased when it is out of favour and later
on, it should come into limelight
Here are our observations on past trends
Low Volume in 1995 and High Volume in 2000
AVERAGE DAILY TRADES
YEAR
INFOSYS
WIPRO
SATYAM
SSI
NO
VALUE
NO
VALUE
NO
VALUE
NO
VALUE
1995
n.a.
11
n.a.
n.a.
14
n.a.
21
1996
13
25
23
1997
53
158
31
21
385
201
63
27
1998
412
1,290
81
132
5,790
11,694
192
183
1999
2,668
5,297
495
440
8,591
22,194
536
832
2000
19,434
32,158
17,798
12,465
31,172
46,938
14,324
12,733
Note: Value of daily trades in Rupees Lakh.
Total institutional holding more particularly FII should be low at the time of purchase.
SHAREHOLDING PATTERN (%)
INFOSYS
February 2001
FII/OCB/NRI
WIPRO
DOMESTIC
SSI
YEAR
DOMESTIC
FII/OCB/NRI
1996
11.5
22.4
0.0
0.0
20.2
2.6
2000
12.1
28.8
0.4
3.4
18.0
19.5
12
CMYK
DOMESTIC
FII/OCB/NRI
Wealth Creation Study
Value of the company at the time of purchase should be relatively
smaller than the size of the opportunity
If the return on the stock has to be anywhere near 100% every year, the base value
has to be modest. Otherwise it will become a mathematical impossibility for a
stock cannot keep growing at such a pace for a long time.
Company
M.Cap as % of
M.Cap as % of
Name
Total Mcap.00
Total Mcap.95
SSI
% of Wealth
Created
0.7
0.0
1.0
15.7
0.2
25.1
Infosys Technologies
7.3
0.1
11.7
Satyam Computer Services
3.1
0.0
5.0
Information Technologies
2.2
0.0
3.5
PSI Data Systems
0.1
0.0
0.2
Cyberspace Infosys
0.1
0.0
0.1
Gramophone Company of India
0.2
0.0
0.2
Trigyn Technologies
0.2
0.0
0.3
Zee Telefilms
5.2
0.1
7.7
34.7
0.5
54.7
Wipro
Top 10 as a % of Total M.Cap.
Most multi-baggers were priced between Rs10cr and Rs1,146cr with a mean value
of Rs233cr.
In the globalised scenario, big companies upto Rs1,000cr can also aspire to be
multi-baggers.
Focus should be on 'price of companies' rather than on 'price of shares'.
UNADJUSTED PRICES (RS)
UNADJUSTED MARKET CAP. (RS CR)
31/03/00
31/03/99
VAR.
31/03/00
31/03/99
VAR.
Wipro
5,493
4,023
36.5
1,25,876
18,439
582.7
Zee Telefilms
1,022
987
3.6
41,749
1,842
2,166.2
Outstanding management
Depth of management is necessary to sustain the competitive edge.
Management should have a long-range profit outlook.
It has to have unquestionable integrity to get better visibility of earnings and
better valuation.
It is the quality of management that decides the success or failure of a business
opportunity.
The valuations accorded to Wipro and Infosys are clear cases in point.
February 2001
13
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Company should have significant re-rating potential
EARNINGS GROWTH (%)
RE-RATING (%)
Top 10
14
86
Top 25
17
83
Top 50
29
71
Top 75
39
61
Top 100
44
56
86% of incremental Wealth Created by top 10 companies is ascribed to P.E rerating while only 14% is due to earnings growth.
56% of the Wealth Creation of MOSt-Inquire 100 is through re-rating and only
44% is through earnings growth.
EARNINGS GROWTH COUPLED WITH P/E RE-RATNG
160
300
LHS: NP y-o-y Growth (%)
RHS: P/E
120
225
80
150
40
75
0
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Acceleration in earnings growth in fourth and fifth year led to massive re-rating.
Focus on payback period
As the legendary Warren Buffett says, Investing is laying out money now to get more money back
in the future in real terms, after taking inflation into account.
Generally, it is observed that market price is often based on the assumption that earnings
will grow at their current rate for another five or more years and then remains constant
(Manitou Investment Management research)
P/E is a very useful tool of valuation but does not reflect growth assumption
upfront.
PEG is another useful tool but assumes stable growth rate for a long time. It also
relies too much on current growth rates. But the reality is that new economy companies
record high growth rates in the initial stages, but are unable to sustain for a long
period. This leads to mis-pricing.
February 2001
14
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Keeping the above shortcomings and market wisdom in mind, we decided to examine
the concept of pay-back ratioor purchase price recovery in five years. We defined
payback ratio as the result of market capitalisation in the year 1995 divided by the sum
of profits for the years from 1996 to 2000. Here are our findings:
PAYBACK RATIO
NO OF
RATE OF RETURN (%)
MULTI-BAGGERS*
COS
MEAN
HIGHEST
LOWEST
<=1
21
73.1
194.6
12.7
1 >=2
31
37.4
144.2
9.7
2>=3
16
36.9
194.1
11.6
>3
28
34.7
134.8
9.3
100
43.9
194.6
9.3
10
Others
All Companies
Note: * = Rate of return greater than or equal to 100% compounded annually in 1995-2000
Maximum number of multi-baggers 6 out of 10 were found amongst the 21
companies, which had a pay-back period of less than 1. SSI had the distinction of
offering the lowest pay-back period of 0.2 and the highest appreciation rate of
194.6% compounded for five years, giving an astounding 221.7 times appreciation
to its shareholders, who purchased the shares on April 1, 1995.
Wipro not only created wealth at the pace of 194.1%, which is just a notch below
SSI, but also created Rs1,24,710, which is almost 25% of all the wealth created by
all the companies during the period 1995-2000.
The mean rate of returns for these 21 companies is 73.1%.
Companies with less than one time pay-back and the market cap of Rs100cr in the
year 2000 have created wealth at 43.9%.
Hence, for finding a multi-bagger, we must examine the likely payback ratio of
the purchase price.
How will one find companies, that have pay-back ratio of less than
one?
If one focusses on a few good companies and the characteristics of their businesses
and managements, it is not difficult to approximate their cash flow for the next
five years.
Phil Fisher says, inspite of many spectacular investment opportunities that existed 25-50 years
ago, there will probably be even more such opportunities available today.
Getting to the next opportunity of finding the multi-baggers, or finding the successful
long-term growth stock, is dependent on a foundation of what Warren Buffett says ...
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so
attractive, that even a mediocre sale gives good results".
February 2001
15
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
'MOSt-Inquire 100' ~ Wealth Creators
MOST-
Appendix I
DUPONT 2000
INQUIRE
COMPANY
RANK
NAME
DUPONT 1995
CAGR (1995-2000) %
NP/
SALES/
ASSET/
NP/
SALES/
ASSET/
WEALTH
SALES
ASSETS
EQUITY
SALES
ASSETS
EQUITY
CREATED
EARNINGS
SSI
28.8
0.3
1.0
63.2
0.5
1.0
194.6
102.3
Wipro
10.9
3.0
1.2
4.3
2.3
2.2
194.1
50.5
Infosys Technologies
33.3
1.1
0.9
24.0
1.0
0.9
172.4
85.6
Satyam Computer
19.2
1.1
1.8
37.4
0.7
1.2
163.2
70.5
Information Tech
30.3
0.2
0.9
25.3
0.8
1.5
144.2
46.4
PSI Data System
17.4
3.1
1.0
0.4
1.1
2.4
134.8
180.5
Cyberspace Info
24.3
1.8
1.1
90.0
0.2
1.0
127.3
153.3
Gramophone Co.
4.3
0.6
1.1
9.0
3.1
7.7
122.1
(5.1)
Trigyn Technolgy
14.8
1.1
1.1
15.9
1.2
1.1
121.4
43.1
10
Zee Telefilms
93.1
0.1
1.0
44.1
0.8
1.0
116.5
67.6
11
Mastek
31.7
1.3
1.2
19.5
1.0
1.4
99.5
47.5
12
DSQ Software
18.1
0.9
2.8
8.8
0.4
2.2
94.2
86.9
13
NIIT
24.6
1.4
1.0
23.7
1.1
1.2
77.7
46.1
14
Vision Technologies
22.0
0.5
1.1
61.2
0.4
4.3
74.6
31.1
15
HFCL
15.2
0.5
1.0
21.7
0.6
1.5
73.4
35.0
16
Fujitsu ICIM
n.a.
0.0
1.3
(2.1)
1.8
2.8
71.5
(184.6)
17
Rolta India
33.9
0.6
1.5
36.0
0.2
1.3
71.0
47.1
18
Global Tele-System
36.6
0.8
1.3
4.9
2.6
3.4
70.6
85.7
19
Moser Baer (I)
28.6
0.4
2.1
12.6
1.1
1.5
65.2
59.8
20
Silverline Tech
35.9
0.5
0.9
28.5
0.9
1.0
64.9
34.9
21
Pentamedia Graph
43.3
0.3
1.0
26.3
1.0
1.6
57.8
61.2
22
DSQ Biotech
3.8
1.4
0.8
23.8
0.2
2.3
56.9
23.8
23
MPhasis BFL
0.4
2.2
1.0
38.8
0.7
2.0
56.6
(38.2)
24
Digital Equipment
34.0
0.8
1.0
8.8
2.5
1.2
54.8
12.8
25
Hero Honda Motor
8.6
4.5
1.1
4.1
4.0
1.6
53.9
58.1
26
Apollo Hospitals
10.9
0.7
1.5
13.7
0.6
1.8
53.6
34.8
27
Indian Shaving
8.4
2.1
1.3
8.2
1.3
1.0
52.8
30.7
28
Sun Pharma
20.5
1.1
1.3
26.5
0.7
1.2
52.2
33.4
29
Vikas Wsp
31.1
1.1
1.3
31.2
1.1
1.1
52.0
58.5
30
Morepen Labs
15.6
0.5
1.9
15.0
1.0
2.5
48.9
44.2
31
Citicorp Securities
6.0
2.1
1.2
25.7
0.3
2.5
46.6
(5.5)
32
C-MAC Centum
17.0
1.4
2.0
(238.2)
0.1
2.4
46.3
(220.0)
33
Elect.Steel Castings
19.5
1.2
1.5
4.9
1.4
2.4
44.3
63.3
34
Adani Exports
3.9
4.3
1.7
3.7
6.7
1.4
42.4
36.2
35
Cipla
19.2
1.2
1.0
9.0
1.4
2.4
40.0
39.9
36
Salora Intl.
5.3
2.0
1.2
4.6
1.2
1.9
39.9
8.9
37
Hikal Chemical
17.2
0.6
6.0
8.5
0.8
1.9
39.3
76.4
38
R S Software
17.6
1.4
1.6
8.7
0.9
1.2
39.3
61.9
39
Dr Reddys Labs
13.8
0.7
1.4
22.1
0.7
1.0
36.5
8.6
40
Cadbury India
7.5
2.5
1.0
6.6
2.7
0.9
34.9
24.5
41
Shyam Telecom
4.3
0.3
1.4
8.4
1.9
2.6
34.2
(0.5)
42
Hindustan Lever
10.6
4.7
1.0
6.7
3.5
1.1
34.2
41.3
43
Tata Elxsi
5.4
2.7
1.4
0.9
1.8
3.1
32.6
70.9
44
Onward Technologies
9.8
1.4
2.1
10.3
1.3
1.4
32.0
15.5
45
Punjab Tractors
13.1
2.7
1.0
7.5
3.3
1.1
32.0
37.6
46
Navneet Publication
16.8
1.7
1.0
10.9
1.5
1.6
30.9
29.6
47
TVS Electronics
1.3
2.0
2.6
4.7
2.1
3.1
29.7
(12.9)
48
Henkel Spic
(2.3)
0.8
1.4
(171.8)
0.0
4.6
29.2
(9.2)
49
Orchid Chemicals
11.2
0.5
1.9
13.4
0.8
1.2
27.9
45.9
50
Novartis India
13.0
2.3
1.0
26.6
1.8
1.2
27.7
(3.2)
February 2001
16
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
'MOSt-Inquire 100' ~ Wealth Creators (Contd.)
MOST-
DUPONT 2000
INQUIRE
COMPANY
RANK
NAME
51
Britannia Industries
52
Swaraj Engines
Appendix I
DUPONT 1995
CAGR (1995-2000) %
NP/
SALES/
ASSET/
NP/
SALES/
ASSET/
WEALTH
SALES
ASSETS
EQUITY
SALES
ASSETS
EQUITY
CREATED
4.5
3.9
1.6
3.7
3.8
1.6
26.7
22.6
13.6
2.8
1.2
10.9
3.1
1.4
26.6
35.3
EARNINGS
53
Pidilite Industries
12.3
1.4
1.6
6.6
1.2
2.5
25.8
30.7
54
Vakrangee Soft.
45.0
0.9
1.1
48.1
0.1
0.9
25.7
134.9
55
HCL Infosystems
56
Crisil
6.9
2.8
1.4
7.0
2.9
1.4
25.5
12.4
38.0
0.7
0.8
44.6
0.8
0.7
25.2
18.1
57
58
United Breweries
4.1
0.4
3.9
9.6
0.7
1.8
25.0
(9.5)
Dabur India
7.8
1.7
1.9
6.2
1.4
2.1
23.1
26.6
59
McDowell & Co
3.3
2.0
1.4
2.9
1.3
1.7
22.4
13.7
60
Krone Communication
13.2
2.1
1.2
14.7
1.3
1.3
22.3
19.3
61
Guj.Gas Company
15.8
1.1
2.3
21.3
1.2
1.7
21.9
19.7
62
Rhone-Poulenc
16.0
2.1
1.1
1.8
1.0
5.8
21.6
78.3
63
Nirma
16.1
0.9
2.0
12.4
2.1
1.1
21.2
41.3
64
Pfizer
10.5
2.8
1.0
3.9
2.1
2.0
21.0
30.8
65
Videsh Sanchar
12.1
1.2
0.9
8.4
3.7
1.0
21.0
23.0
66
ITC
20.6
1.2
1.2
11.0
1.5
2.1
20.9
24.8
67
Reliance Petroleum
n.a.
0.0
0.7
n.a.
0.0
0.1
20.8
n.a.
68
Sundaram Clayton
9.8
1.3
1.2
9.7
1.3
1.2
20.7
13.3
69
Sandesh
11.5
1.2
1.2
9.5
1.0
1.8
20.3
19.6
70
Reliance Industries
17.9
0.5
2.3
27.5
0.5
1.0
19.2
17.7
71
Birla 3M
0.7
2.1
1.6
5.1
1.3
1.2
19.1
(12.8)
72
Jagsonpal Pharma
9.2
1.6
1.9
6.4
1.8
3.7
18.4
32.0
73
Sri Vishnu Cement
(6.2)
1.6
7.6
5.1
1.3
(4.8)
17.9
(207.0)
74
German Remedies
16.5
1.7
1.0
9.5
1.8
1.5
17.8
27.8
75
Ranbaxy Labs
12.8
0.9
1.2
16.5
0.6
1.6
17.4
12.3
76
Natl.Aluminium
25.7
0.7
0.9
22.6
0.4
1.8
17.3
11.3
77
Monsanto Chemicals
11.6
2.3
1.0
9.1
6.0
1.0
16.9
25.3
78
Tata Honeywell
79
Hind.Inks
7.4
2.5
1.8
2.8
1.9
3.6
15.9
40.9
13.0
1.0
1.6
19.6
0.9
3.2
15.4
26.6
80
Glaxo (India)
8.7
2.4
1.0
3.3
2.6
1.3
15.4
32.3
81
Kodak India
4.5
2.4
1.1
11.4
4.0
1.3
15.2
3.3
82
Blue Dart Express
6.0
1.3
1.7
9.8
1.7
1.0
14.1
7.7
83
Essel Packaging
17.7
0.8
1.2
24.3
0.5
1.9
14.1
19.5
84
Sterlite Industries
85
HDFC
86
5.1
0.7
2.3
18.6
0.7
1.2
14.0
(1.8)
20.0
0.1
7.2
18.8
0.1
6.1
13.8
22.4
Burr Brown India
2.4
3.7
0.7
95.9
0.2
0.7
13.6
1.3
87
Mahindra & Mahindra
7.5
1.3
1.4
6.9
1.6
1.5
13.5
17.6
88
Berger Paints
5.4
2.2
1.6
3.9
2.7
2.0
13.5
28.1
89
Smith.B.Consumer
16.0
2.4
0.8
11.2
2.7
1.2
12.8
29.1
90
P & G Hygiene
17.8
2.2
1.0
5.8
1.8
1.1
12.7
39.9
91
Exide Industries
6.4
1.0
2.8
4.5
1.2
2.6
12.7
37.0
92
Tata Infomedia
10.6
1.0
1.0
11.9
1.0
1.1
12.6
17.9
93
Smith.B.Pharma
8.3
1.9
1.0
9.0
2.4
1.0
12.2
10.4
94
MIRC Electronics
6.3
1.9
2.0
7.2
1.9
1.6
11.9
17.1
95
Atcom Technologies
12.0
1.0
1.5
22.8
0.8
1.5
11.6
13.4
96
Tata Telecom
(3.1)
1.4
2.8
8.0
1.0
1.4
10.1
(199.0)
97
Guj. Ambuja Cement
38.3
0.4
1.8
27.2
0.5
1.6
10.0
33.6
98
Usha Beltron
6.1
0.6
2.6
19.5
0.7
1.2
9.7
9.4
99
Nicholas Piramal
10.8
0.9
1.3
19.9
0.5
1.4
9.3
11.8
6.7
3.7
1.4
6.0
2.7
1.1
9.3
19.5
100
Nestle India
February 2001
17
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
'MOSt-Inquire 100' ~ Wealth Creators (Alphabetically listed)
MOSt
NET WEALTH
INQUIRE
COMPANY
RANK
NAME
CREATED AMOUNT
5 YEAR PRICE
CAGR (%)
ROE (%)
2000
Appendix II
ROE (%)
1995
P/E
P/E
PAYBACK
2000
1995
RATIO
(RS CR)
34
Adani Exports
26
Apollo Hospitals
1417
42.4
28.7
35.2
15.2
11.6
0.8
320
53.6
12.2
13.8
17.7
8.5
0.8
95
Atcom Technologies
485
11.6
18.0
27.3
37.8
16.2
2.4
88
Berger Paints
151
13.5
18.6
21.7
11.2
11.9
0.9
71
Birla 3M
312
19.1
2.3
7.8
513.7
108.0
11.9
82
Blue Dart Expres
234
14.1
13.8
17.2
33.1
17.7
6.1
51
Britannia Industries
1198
26.7
27.4
21.9
33.8
28.8
3.5
86
Burr Brown India
336
13.6
6.7
10.2
385.2
111.8
12.3
56
Crisil
167
25.2
21.7
24.1
19.2
14.3
1.6
40
Cadbury India
1700
34.9
18.9
16.8
57.6
35.4
3.7
35
Cipla
5507
40.0
23.6
29.7
50.5
47.0
2.6
31
Citicorp Securities
327
46.6
15.3
20.4
152.7
17.0
10.0
12.6
32
7
58
C-MAC Centum
186
46.3
46.9
39.5
Cyberspace Info
652
127.3
45.6
19.6
70.6
99.0
0.5
1509
23.1
24.3
17.6
30.1
34.6
3.3
Dabur India
24
Digital Equipment
2069
54.8
27.8
27.8
83.8
17.2
1.7
39
Dr Reddys Labs
3417
36.5
13.9
16.4
70.8
20.9
3.4
22
DSQ Biotech
12
DSQ Software
719
56.9
4.4
12.7
234.0
39.8
4.0
4731
94.2
42.5
7.8
135.7
68.3
1.1
33
Elect.Steel Castings
578
44.3
35.5
16.5
7.5
8.6
0.3
83
Essel Packaging
305
14.1
16.5
25.5
17.4
16.8
1.9
91
Exide Inds.
172
12.7
17.0
14.4
9.1
15.3
0.9
16
Fujitsu ICIM
1207
71.5
6.5
937.7
(6.9)
74
German Remedies
80
Glaxo (India)
18
Global Tele-Sys
Gramophone Co.
Guj.Ambuja Cement
1320
97
293
17.8
28.3
25.5
16.2
24.3
2.3
2062
15.4
21.4
11.2
34.9
34.5
1.7
9211
70.6
36.6
43.6
41.9
11.8
0.3
1035
122.1
2.9
217.9
210.5
5.8
2.2
10.0
30.4
21.2
7.3
16.4
1.7
61
Guj.Gas Company
282
21.9
39.5
41.0
11.6
10.6
1.3
85
HDFC
2089
13.8
19.2
16.7
11.3
13.9
1.4
55
HCL Infosystems
1294
25.5
27.8
28.7
25.9
14.9
3.5
48
Henkel Spic
423
29.2
(2.9)
25
Hero Honda Motor
37
Hikal Chemical
15
HFCL
79
Hind.Inks
42
Hindustan Lever
27
Indian Shaving
3425
53.9
42.8
25.5
20.2
23.1
1.0
114
39.3
59.0
13.2
8.2
16.0
0.9
10990
73.4
7.1
18.7
141.1
11.3
1.1
211
15.4
21.0
60.0
14.8
14.7
1.4
45363
34.2
50.9
26.6
50.1
43.0
2.6
2125
52.8
22.5
10.5
124.3
56.9
5.1
Information Tech
17373
144.2
6.3
31.1
250.2
14.2
1.1
Infosys Technologies
58265
172.4
35.2
21.3
200.7
25.9
0.6
66
ITC
11049
20.9
29.0
33.4
22.8
26.5
2.7
72
Jagsonpal Pharma
166
18.4
26.8
41.5
23.3
21.7
1.7
81
Kodak India
302
15.2
11.9
58.1
22.1
5.2
2.2
60
Krone Communication
124
22.3
32.6
24.2
26.4
23.3
5.6
87
Mahindra & Mahindra
1550
13.5
13.2
16.1
13.5
13.7
1.4
11
Mastek
2859
99.5
49.8
27.1
100.1
19.6
1.7
59
McDowell & Co
552
22.4
9.1
6.3
33.2
17.0
3.3
94
MIRC Electronics
121
11.9
24.9
22.3
6.1
7.6
1.2
77
Monsanto Chemicals
136
16.9
28.0
52.8
20.9
28.9
2.8
30
Morepen Labs
1653
48.9
13.6
36.1
38.7
9.5
0.5
Note: Payback Ratio = Market Cap. of 1995 divided by sum of five years profit from 1996 to 2000.
February 2001
18
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Appendix II
'MOSt-Inquire 100' ~ Wealth Creators (Contd.)
MOSt
NET WEALTH
INQUIRE
COMPANY
RANK
NAME
CREATED AMOUNT
5 YEAR PRICE
CAGR (%)
ROE (%)
ROE (%)
2000
1995
P/E
P/E
PAYBACK
2000
1995
RATIO
(RS CR)
19
Moser Baer (I)
23
MPhasis BFL
977
65.2
23.6
21.0
25.0
9.8
0.4
1041
56.6
0.8
54.9
2603.1
15.9
10.3
76
46
Natl.Aluminium
967
17.3
16.0
14.8
6.4
9.9
1.2
Navneet Publications
465
30.9
28.4
26.9
23.5
14.3
1.2
Nestle India
1328
9.3
34.1
17.5
36.7
57.2
6.3
99
Nicholas Piramal
1360
9.3
12.7
13.4
44.0
24.5
3.8
13
NIIT
7489
77.7
34.5
33.8
55.5
20.8
1.1
63
Nirma
4054
21.2
27.3
28.3
21.6
23.5
1.4
50
Novartis India
2044
27.7
31.6
57.3
27.3
6.3
3.0
44
Onward Technologies
159
32.0
28.5
19.1
52.5
21.5
9.9
49
Orchid Chemicals
498
27.9
10.3
13.0
20.2
12.1
0.5
90
P & G Hygiene
577
12.7
38.1
11.9
16.8
49.5
3.0
21
Pentamedia Graphics
4171
57.8
13.9
43.8
27.1
11.5
0.4
64
Pfizer
662
21.0
28.9
16.8
34.9
51.4
4.4
53
Pidilite Industries
584
25.8
26.2
20.1
17.5
20.4
1.8
PSI Data System
983
134.8
52.4
1.2
98.3
1135.5
4.0
45
Punjab Tractors
1168
32.0
35.8
28.0
11.6
14.3
0.9
38
R S Software
159
39.3
39.0
9.8
17.4
32.6
1.4
75
Ranbaxy Labs
5186
17.4
13.1
17.2
41.6
24.8
3.3
70
Reliance Industries
20442
19.2
22.0
14.8
13.8
11.2
1.4
67
Reliance Petroleum
19226
20.8
0.0
0.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
62
Rhone-Poulenc
261
21.6
36.7
10.6
11.3
76.8
1.4
17
Rolta India
2958
71.0
27.7
9.6
52.3
20.1
1.1
36
Salora Intl.
181
39.9
13.2
10.1
27.3
12.5
3.1
69
Sandesh
127
20.3
16.9
17.0
13.7
13.3
1.3
24676
163.2
37.1
30.8
191.6
14.9
0.5
100
Satyam Computer
41
Shyam Telecom
2099
34.2
1.8
41.0
792.1
40.3
4.3
20
Silverline Tech
4620
64.9
15.4
25.0
72.9
15.7
1.4
89
Smith.B.Consumer
823
12.8
32.8
35.4
18.6
36.5
3.1
93
Smith.B.Pharma
285
12.2
15.1
20.8
26.4
24.4
2.9
73
Sri Vishnu Cement
111
17.9
11.6
2.9
SSI
5173
194.6
9.7
28.9
99.9
11.3
0.2
84
Sterlite Industries
2328
14.0
7.8
15.0
40.4
14.2
2.4
28
Sun Pharma
637
52.2
28.8
22.9
10.9
16.2
1.2
68
Sundaram Clayton
318
20.7
16.0
14.2
23.0
16.8
2.4
52
Swaraj Engines
118
26.6
47.1
46.6
8.9
12.4
0.9
43
Tata Elxsi
335
32.6
20.3
5.2
59.5
105.8
3.5
78
Tata Honeywell
122
15.9
33.4
19.4
11.4
24.5
2.0
92
Tata Infomedia
110
12.6
11.0
14.0
23.3
21.8
2.3
96
Tata Telecom
106
10.1
11.7
18.4
(5.3)
0.6
1358
121.4
17.0
20.8
140.0
14.9
47
TVS Electronics
235
29.7
6.9
30.1
142.0
16.3
7.4
57
United Breweries
306
25.0
5.8
13.0
40.7
7.2
1.8
98
Usha Beltron
426
9.7
9.6
15.3
18.2
10.0
1.7
54
Vakrangee Soft.
171
25.7
44.3
5.4
22.8
212.3
4.3
65
Videsh Sanchar
10337
21.0
13.6
31.6
20.8
19.0
1.4
29
Vikas Wsp
710
52.0
43.1
37.9
11.2
13.8
0.6
14
Vision Technologies
247
74.6
11.6
96.8
222.3
17.6
3.6
124710
194.1
38.8
21.1
507.0
35.6
2.1
38225
116.5
7.5
34.3
156.2
19.8
0.9
2
10
Trigyn Technology
Wipro
Zee Telefilms
Note: Payback Ratio = Market Cap. of 1995 divided by sum of five years profit from 1996 to 2000.
February 2001
19
CMYK
Wealth Creation Study
Summation of Earnings (Cumulative earnings in x years for y% growth in profits) Appendix III
Years
%r
10
15
20
0.10
1.1
2.3
3.6
5.1
6.7
8.5
10.4
12.6
14.9
17.5
34.9
63.0
0.11
1.1
2.3
3.7
5.2
6.9
8.8
10.9
13.2
15.7
18.6
38.2
71.3
0.12
1.1
2.4
3.8
5.4
7.1
9.1
11.3
13.8
16.5
19.7
41.8
80.7
0.13
1.1
2.4
3.8
5.5
7.3
9.4
11.8
14.4
17.4
20.8
45.7
91.5
0.14
1.1
2.4
3.9
5.6
7.5
9.7
12.2
15.1
18.3
22.0
50.0
103.8
0.15
1.2
2.5
4.0
5.7
7.8
10.1
12.7
15.8
19.3
23.3
54.7
117.8
0.16
1.2
2.5
4.1
5.9
8.0
10.4
13.2
16.5
20.3
24.7
59.9
133.8
0.17
1.2
2.5
4.1
6.0
8.2
10.8
13.8
17.3
21.4
26.2
65.6
152.1
0.18
1.2
2.6
4.2
6.2
8.4
11.1
14.3
18.1
22.5
27.8
71.9
173.0
0.19
1.2
2.6
4.3
6.3
8.7
11.5
14.9
18.9
23.7
29.4
78.9
196.8
0.20
1.2
2.6
4.4
6.4
8.9
11.9
15.5
19.8
25.0
31.2
86.4
224.0
0.21
1.2
2.7
4.4
6.6
9.2
12.3
16.1
20.7
26.3
33.0
94.8
255.0
0.22
1.2
2.7
4.5
6.7
9.4
12.7
16.8
21.7
27.7
35.0
103.9
290.3
0.23
1.2
2.7
4.6
6.9
9.7
13.2
17.4
22.7
29.1
37.0
114.0
330.6
0.24
1.2
2.8
4.7
7.0
10.0
13.6
18.1
23.7
30.6
39.2
125.0
376.5
0.25
1.3
2.8
4.8
7.2
10.3
14.1
18.8
24.8
32.3
41.6
137.1
428.7
0.26
1.3
2.8
4.8
7.4
10.5
14.5
19.6
25.9
33.9
44.0
150.4
488.1
0.27
1.3
2.9
4.9
7.5
10.8
15.0
20.4
27.1
35.7
46.6
164.9
555.7
0.28
1.3
2.9
5.0
7.7
11.1
15.5
21.2
28.4
37.6
49.4
180.9
632.6
0.29
1.3
3.0
5.1
7.9
11.4
16.1
22.0
29.7
39.6
52.3
198.3
720.0
0.30
1.3
3.0
5.2
8.0
11.8
16.6
22.9
31.0
41.6
55.4
217.5
819.2
0.35
1.4
3.2
5.6
9.0
13.4
19.5
27.7
38.7
53.6
73.7
343.9
1555.5
0.40
1.4
3.4
6.1
9.9
15.3
22.9
33.4
48.2
68.8
97.7
541.0
2924.9
0.45
1.5
3.6
6.6
11.0
17.4
26.7
40.2
59.7
88.1
129.2
845.3
5435.7
0.50
1.5
3.8
7.1
12.2
19.8
31.2
48.3
73.9
112.3
170.0
1310.7
9972.8
0.55
1.6
4.0
7.7
13.4
22.4
36.3
57.8
91.1
142.7
222.8
2015.3
18052.4
0.60
1.6
4.2
8.3
14.8
25.3
42.1
68.9
111.9
180.6
290.5
3071.8
32235.4
0.65
1.7
4.4
8.9
16.3
28.5
48.7
82.0
136.9
227.6
377.1
4640.8
56784.5
0.70
1.7
4.6
9.5
17.9
32.1
56.2
97.2
167.0
285.6
487.2
6949.2
98700.3
0.75
1.8
4.8
10.2
19.6
36.0
64.7
115.0
202.9
356.9
626.2
10314.5
169329.2
0.80
1.8
5.0
10.9
21.4
40.3
74.3
135.5
245.7
444.1
801.1
15177.7
286833.1
0.85
1.9
5.3
11.6
23.3
45.0
85.1
159.2
296.4
550.3
1019.9
22145.5
479938.3
0.90
1.9
5.5
12.4
25.4
50.2
97.2
186.6
356.4
679.1
1292.2
32046.9
793564.0
0.95
2.0
5.8
13.2
27.6
55.8
110.8
218.0
427.1
834.7
1629.7
46005.6
1297186.9
1.00
2.0
6.0
14.0
30.0
62.0
126.0
254.0
510.0
1022.0
2046.0
65534.0
2097150.0
Note: % r = rate of earning growth
For more copies or other information, contact:
Motilal Oswal - Inquire: (91 22) 207 3809/1379 Fax (91 22) 207 6686 E-Mail:
[email protected]Sales: (91 22) 281 2500 (Institutional: Navin Agarwal, Retail: Mihir Kothari)
This document is for information purposes only. In no circumstances should it be used or considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell the securities or commodities
mentioned in it. The information in this document has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such.
February 2001
20
CMYK
