AN INTRODUETION To Geotechnical Engineering ROBGET DeHloliz Willams Bo Kovacs FUCA Wand raga ly pare We OCAn Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering PRENTICE HALL, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632Library of Congress Catcloging in Publication Data Hourz, Roamer D. 2 ‘Aa introduetion to geotechnical enginedring Tocludes index. Soll properties. 2. Soil mechanics. 1. Kovacs. William D., joint author. IL. Tite TATIONS" 6241'513. 8023292 ISBN 0-13-48429¢0 DEDICATION: To Our Teachers, Past and Present Editorial [production supereision ‘and interior design by Karen Skrable Manufacturing buyers: Anthony Caruso and Joyce Levatino Cover design by Edsal Enterprises EB © 1981 by Prentice Hall, Inc. A Paramount Communications Company Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 All rights reserved. No part of this book may bbe reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher. 90000 Printed in the United States of America 30 29 28 27 26 ISBN O-13-484394-0 9978013484394 Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Toronto Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A., Mexico Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi Prentice-Hall of Japan, Inc., Tokyo Simon & Schuster Asia Pre. Lid., Singapore Editora Prentice-Hall do Brasil, Lida., Rio de JaneiroContents PREFACE xi 4 INTRCDUCTION TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 1 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1 1.2. The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials 3 1.3 Suggested Approach to the Study of Geotechnical Engineering 4 14 Scope of this Book 5 15 Soil Formation and the Nature of Soil Constituents 6 1.6 Historical Development of Geotechnical Engineering 7 1.7 Notes on Symbols and Units 9 2 INDEX AND CLASSIFICATION PROPERTIES OF SOILS 10 2.1 Introduction 10 22 Basic Definitions and Phase Relations 1 23 Solution of Phase Problems 16 24 Soil Texture 25 2.5 Grain Size and Grain Size Distribution 26 2.6 Particle Shape 32 2.7 Atterberg Limits and Consistency Indices 34 28 Activity 41 Problems 4/ 3 SOIL CLASSIFICATION 47 3.1 Introduction 47 3.2 The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) 4933 34 ‘The AASHTO Soil Classification System 64 ‘Comparison of the USCS and AASHTO Classification Systems 72 Problems 72 4 CLAY MINERALS AND SOIL STRUCTURE 77 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Introduction 77 Clay Minerals 78 Identification of Clay Minerals 88 Specific Surface 89 Interaction Between Water and Clay Minerals Interaction of Clay Particles 95 a Soil Structure and Fabric 96 Cobesive Soil Fabrics 96, Cobesionless Soil Fabrics 102 Problems 107 5 COMPACTION 109 Sa 52 53 54 35 56 $a 6 WATER IN SOILS, I: Introduction 109 Compaction 110 Theory of Compaction 171 Properties and Structure of Compacted Cohesive Soils 117 Field Compaction Equipment and Procedures Contents 90 Im, Field Compaction Coritrd¥and Specifications 141 Estimating Performance of Compacted Soils 153 Problems 161 CAPILLARITY, SHRINKAGE, SWELLING, FROST ACTION 166 61 62 63 64 65 Introduction 166 Capillarity 167 Shrinkage Phenomena in Soils 178 Engineering Significance of Shrinkage and ‘Swelling 186 Frost Action 190 Problems 195Contents, wt 7 WATER IN SOILS, Il PERMEABILITY, SEEPAGE, EFFECTIVE STRESS 199 7.1 Introduction 199 72 Dynamics of Fluid Flow 200 7.3. Darcy's Law for Flow Through Porous Media 203 14 Measurement of Permeability 206 7.5 Intergranular or Effective Stress 213 7.6 Relationship between Horizontal and Vertical Stresses 225 7.7 Heads and One-Dimensional Flow 227 78 Seepage Forces, Quicksand, and Liquefaction 232 7.9 Seepage and Flow Nets: Two-Dimensional Flow 246 7.10 The Method of Fragments 258 7.11 Control of Seepage and Filters 270 Problems 273 8 CONSOLIDATION AND CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS 283 8.1 Introduction 283 8.2 Components of Settlement 284 83 Compressibility of Soils 285 84 The Oedometer and Consolidation Testing 289 8.5 Preconsolidation Pressure; Normal, Overconsolidation, Underconsolidation 294 8.6 Consolidation Behavior of Natural Soils 299 8.7 Settlement Calculations 309 8.8 Factors Affecting the Determination of of 326 89 Prediction of Field Consolidation Curves 328 8.10 Soil Profiles 335 8.11 Approximate Methods and Typical Values of Compression Indices 341 8.12 Stress Distribution 342 Problems 367 9 TIME RATE OF CONSOLIDATION 376 9.1 Introduction 376 9.2 The Consolidation Process 377 9.3. Terzaghi’s One-Dimensional Consolidation Theory 380 9.4 Determination of the Coefficient of Consolidation cy 395 9.5 Determination of the Coefficient of Permeability 402 9.6 Typical Values of cy 405wu 97 98 Evaluation of Secondary Settlement . 405 Comprehensive Example of a Time Rate of Settlement Problem 4/4 Problems 423 - 10 THE MOHR CIRCLE, FAILURE THEORIES, AND STRESS PATHS 437 " 10.1 10.2 103 104 105 106 Introduction 431 Stress at a Point 432 ‘Stress-Strain Relationships and Failure Criteria’ 446 ‘The Mobr-Coulomb Failure Criterion 449 Tests for the Shear Strength of Soils 458 Stress Paths 473 Problems 485 SHEAR STRENGTH OF SANDS AND CLAYS 490 MW 2 u3 M4 ns us na 18 ng Hot 192 193 194 19s 11.96 11.97 119.8 11.99 1.9.10 nan 1.9.12 1.9.13 Introduction 490 Angle of Repose of Sands 492 Behavior of Saturated Sands During Drained Shear 493 Effect of Void Ratio and Confining Pressure on Volume Change 496 Behavior of Saturated Sand During Undrained Shear 504 Factors that Affect the Shear Strength of Sands 5/4 ‘The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest for Sands 519 Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Behavior of Saturated Sands 521 ‘Stress-Deformation and Strength Characteristics of Saturated Cobesive Soils 536 Consolidated-Drained (CD) Test Behavior 538 Typical Values of Drained Strength Parameters 543 Use of CD Strength in Engineering Practice 545 Consolidated-Undrained (CU) Test Behavior 545 Typical Values of the Undrained Strength Parameters 553 Use of CU Strength in Enginecring Practice 556 Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) Test Behavior 559 Typical Values of UU Strengths 566 Unconfined Compression Test 566 Other Ways to Determine the Undrained Shear Strength 570 Sensitivity 585 Use of Undrained (UU) Shear Strength in Engineering Practice 586 Special Problems of the Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils 59511.10 Pore Pressure Parameters 599 M111 The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest for Clays 605 11.12. Stress Paths During Undrained Loading —Normally Consolidated Clays 610 11.13 Stress Paths During Undrained Loading — Overconsolidated Clays 630 11.14 Applications of Stress Paths to Engineering Practice 634 Problems 640 APPENDIX A APPLICATION OF THE “SI” SYSTEM OF UNITS TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 665 Al Introduction 665 A2 The SI Metric System 666 A3_ Basic and Derived SI Metric Units 667 A4_ SI Units of Interest to Geotechnical Engineers and Their Conversion Factors 669 APPENDIX B-1 DERIVATION OF LAPLACE’S EQUATION 687 APPENDIX B-2 DERIVATION AND SOLUTION OF TERZAGHI'S ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION THEORY 683 B21 Assumptions 683 B22 Derivation 683 B-2.3 Mathematical Solution 686 APPENDIX 8-3 PORE PRESSURE PARAMETERS 691 B-3.1 Derivation of Skempton’s Pore Pressure Equation 691 B-3.2 Definition of Ao, and Ao, for Rotation of Principal Stresses 693 B-3.3 Formulas for Pore Pressure Parameters for Different Stress Path Tests 694 B-3.4 Proof that 4j.= Ay, and Age Aye 696 B-3.5 Derivation of the Henkel Pore Pressure Equation and Coefficients 696 REFERENCES 701 INDEX 719Preface ‘An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering is intended for use in the first of a two-course sequence in geotechnical engineering usually taught to third- and fourth-year undergraduate Civil Engineering students. We as- sume the students have a working knowledge of undergraduate mechanics, especially statics and mechanics of materials (including fluids). A know!- edge of basic geology, although helpful, is not essential. We introduce the “language” of geotechnical engineering in the first course, that is, the classification and engineering properties of soils. Once the student has a working knowledge of how soil behaves as an engineering material, he/she can begin to predict soil behavior and, in the second course, to carry out the design of simple foundations and earthwork systems. We feel that there is a need for more detailed and modern coverage of the engineering properties of soils than is found in most undergraduate texts. This applies to both the students “majoring” in geotechnical en- gineering and the general civil engineering undergraduate student. We find that our students are involved in increasingly more complex projects, especially in transportation, structural, and construction engineering. En- vironmental, economic, and political constraints demand innovative solu- tions to civil engineering problems. The availability of modern analytical techniques and the digital computer has had an almost revolutionary effect ‘on engineering design practice. This development demands a better knowl- edge of site conditions as well as better defined geotechnical engineering design parameters. ‘We have tried to make the text easily readable by the average undergraduate. To this end, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering is written at a simple rather than sophisticated level, although the material covered may be rather sophisticated at times. Involved derivations, unreadxn Pretace by the typical student, are relegated to appendices where they are available to the interested student. The emphasis throughout is on the practical, and admittedly empiri- cal, knowledge of soil behavior required by the geotechnical engineer for the design and construction of foundations and embankments. Most of the material in the text is descriptive, since most of the engineering design applications are usually left to the second course in Foundation Engineer- ing. Consequently, in order to interest the student, we have tried to indicate wherever possible the engineering significance and specific design applications of the soil property being discussed. We have tried to em- Phasize why such a property is needed, how it is determined or measured, and, to some extent, how it is actually used in practice. The only “design” type problem we cover in a one-semester course (15 weeks) is estimating the settlement of shallow foundations on saturated clays., The text is sufficiently flexible that innovative instructors can add additional design examples should they so desire. It seems that units are always a problem with geotechnical engineers. In line with the trend towards the use of S. units encouraged by the American Society of Civil Engineers and Ame can Society for Testing and Materials, we have used this system in the text. The uninitiated may find the discussion of S.J. in Appendix A helpful. In addition to the almost exclusive use of S.1. units in examples and problems, we have been careful to use the latest definition of density (mass/unit volume) in phase relationships as well as in geostatic and hydrostatic pressure computations. We consider the laboratory portion of the first course to be an essential part of the neophyte engineer's experience with soils as a unique engineering material. How else is the young engineer to begin to develop a “feel” for soils and soil behavior, so essential for the successful practice of geotechnical engineering? Thus, an emphasis on laboratory and field testing is found throughout the text. The order of the laboratory portion of our first course has dictated the organization and development of the material in the text, We begin with phase relations, visual classification of soils, and simple classification tests. Thus, the early chapters introduce the discipline of Geotechnical Engineering, Phase Relationships and Index Properties, Soil Classification, and Clay Minerals and Soil Structure. This material provides the background and terminology for the later -chapters. Following a very practical discussion of Compaction in Chapter 5, Chapters 6 and 7 describe how water influences and affects soil behavior. Topics Presented include capillarity, shrinkage, swelling, and frost action as well as permeability, seepage, and effective stress. These two chapters again serve as background for the next four chapters which deal with consolida- tion and shear strength.Pretece tt The treatment of these latter topics is quite modern and up-to-date. The Schmertmann procedure for determining field compressibility is in- cluded as is a modern treatment of secondary compression developed by Prof. Mesri and his co-workers. Prof. Lambe’s stress path method is introduced in Chapter 10 and used to advantage in Chapter 11, especially when practical engineering applications of shear strength theory are dis- cussed. The pioneering work of Profs. Seed and Lee on the drained and undrained strength of sands is presented in Chapter 11. Also in this chapter we discuss the stress-deformation and strength characteristics of cohesive soils. Although the treatment is modern, because this is primarily an undergraduate textbook, considerations of strength anisotropy, critical state concepts, the Jiirgenson-Rutledge hypothesis, and Hvorslev’s strength parameters have been left to more advanced texts. Even though the book is primarily for the beginning student in geotechnical engineering, advanced students in other disciplines and en- gineers desiring a refresher in engineering properties may find the book helpful. Because of the many fully-worked example problems, the book is almost “self-teaching.” This aspect of the text also frees the instructor in a formal course from the necessity of working example problems during lectures. It allows the instructor to concentrate on explaining basic princi ples and illustrating specific engineering applications of the points in question. The third group we hope will find this book useful are practicing geotechnical engineers. Typical values are given for all classification ard engineering properties for a wide variety of soils; we have found such a compendium very useful in our own engineering practice. To acknowledge all who have contributed to this book is a formida- ble task. We have tried whenever possible to indicate by references or quotations, concepts and ideas originating in the literature or with our former teachers, especially Profs. A. Casagrande and H. B. Seed. We apologize for any omissions. We must also mention the students in our beginning geotechnical engineering course at Purdue who have graciously suffered through several versions of An Introduction t0 Geotechnical En- gineering in note form. Their criticism and helpful comments on the text have been very valuable. The authors have greatly benefited from discus- sions with Prof. MoE. Harr of Purdue University regarding the section on the method of fragments in Chapter 7. We hope to bring further attention to the profession of this powerful design method. Dr. E. Simiu of the U.S. National Bureau of Standards critically read a recent version of the manuscript and provided many helpful comments. It should be noted that An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering was written while William D. Kovacs was on the faculty of Purdue University. The text has no connec- tion with Kovacs’ present affiliation with the National Bureau of Stan-aw Pretece dards. Our faithful secretaries Mrs. Janice Wait Bollinger, Miss Cathy Minth and Mrs. Edith Vanderwerp deserve special thanks for typing and correcting the several drafts. The first author also wishes to gratefully acknowledge the interest and encouragement of his wife Cricket Morgan. Her work with the proofreading and corrections is especially appreciated. We of course will appreciate any comments and criticism of readers. R.D. Holtz, W. D. Kovacs West Lafayette, indianaone Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Geotechnical engineering, as the name implies, concerns the applica- tion of civil engineering technology to some aspect of the earth. Usually, the geotechnical engineer is concerned only with the natural materials found at or near the surface of the earth. Civil engineers call these earthen materials soil and rock. Soil, in an engineering sense, is the relatively loose agglomerate of mineral and organic materials and sediments found above the bedrock. Soils can be relatively easily broken down into their con- stituent mineral or organic particles. Rocks, on the other hand, have very strong internal cohesive and molecular forces which hold the constituent ‘mineral grains together. This is true whether the rock is massive bedrock or a piece of gravel found in a clay soil. The dividing line between soil and rock is arbitrary, and many natural materials encountered in engineering practice cannot be easily classified. They may be either a “very soft rock” or a “very hard soil.” Other scientific disciplines have different meanings for the terms soil and rock. In geology, for example, rock means all the materials found in the earth’s crust, independently of how much the mineral particles are bound together. Soils to a geologist are just decom- posed and disintegrated rocks generally found in the very thin upper part of the crust and capable of supporting plant life. Similarly, pedology (soil science) and agronomy are concerned with only the very uppermost layers of soil, that is, those materials relating to agriculture and forestry. Geotech- nical engineers can learn much from both geology and pedology. Both sciences, especially engineering geology, are important adjuncts to geotech- nical engineering and there is considerable overlap between these fields. But differences in terminology, approach, and objectives may cause some confusion, especially for the beginner.2 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical engineering has several different aspects or emphases. Soil mechanics is the branch of geotechnical engineering concerned with the engineering mechanics and properties of soil, whereas rock mechanics is concerned with the engineering mechanics and properties of rock, usually but not necessarily the bedrock. Soil mechanics applies the basic principles of mechanics including kinematics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, and the mechanics of materials to soils. In other words, soil rather than water or steel or concrete, for example, now becomes the engineering material whose properties and behavior we must understand in order to build with it or upon it. A similar comment could also be made for rock mechanics. It should be noted, however, that there are significant differences between the behavior of soil masses and rock masses, and in principle there is not much overlap between the two disciplines. Foundation engineering applies geology, soil mechanics, rock mecha- nics, and structural engineering to the design and construction of founda- tions for civil engineering and other structures. The foundation engineer must be able to predict the performance or response of the foundation soil or rock to the loads imposed by the structure. Some examples of the kinds of problems faced by the foundation engineer include foundations for industrial, commercial, and residential buildings, and other types of sup- port structures for radar towers, as well as foundations for oil and other kinds of tanks and offshore structures. Even ships must have a dry dock during construction or repairs, and the dry dock must have a foundation. The support of rockets and appurtenant structures during construction and launch have led to very interesting and challenging foundation engineering problems. Related geotechnical engineering problems facing the founda- tion engineer are the stability of natural and excavated slopes, the stability of permanent and temporary carth-retaining structures, problems of con- struction, controlling water movement and pressures, and even the mainte- nance and rehabilitation of old buildings. Not only must the foundation safely support the static structural and construction loads, but it must also adequately resist dynamic loads due to blasting, earthquakes, etc. Hf you think about it, it is impossible to design or construct any civil engineering structure without ultimately considering the foundation soils and rocks to some extent, and this is true whether the structure is built on the earth or is extraterrestrial. The performance, economy, and safety of any civil engineering structure ultimately is affected or may even be controlled by its foundation. Earth materials are often used as a construction material because they are the cheapest possible building material. However, its engineering Properties such as strength and compressibility are often naturally poor, and measures must be taken to densify, strengthen, or otherwise stabilize and reinforce soils so that they will perform satisfactorily in service.1.2 The Unique Nature of Soll and Rock Materials 3 Highway and railway embankments, airfields, earth and rock dams, levees, and aqueducts are examples of earth structures, and the geotechnical engineer is responsible for their design and construction. Dam safety and rehabilitation of old dams are important aspects of this phase of geotechni- cal engineering. Also related, especially for highway and airfield engineers, is the design of the final surface layer on the earth structure, the pavement. Here the overlap between the transportation and geotechnical disciplines is apparent. Rock engineering, analogous to foundation engineering for soils, is concerned with rock as a foundation and construction material. Because ‘most of the earth's surface is covered with soil (or water), rock engineering, usually occurs underground (tunnels, underground power houses, petro- eum storage rooms, mines, etc.). But sometimes rock engineering occurs at the surface, such as in the case of building and dam foundations carried to bedrock, deep excavations to bedrock, stability of rock slopes, etc. In presenting some of the typical problems facing the geotechnical engineer, we wanted you to see, first, how broad the field is and, second, how important it is to the design and construction of civil engineering structures. In a very real sense, geotechnical engineering combines the basic physical sciences, geology and pedology, with hydraulic, structural, transportation, construction, and mining engineering, 1.2 THE UNIQUE NATURE OF SOIL. AND ROCK MATERIALS: Geotechnical engineering is highly empirical and is perhaps much more of an “art” than the other disciplines within civil engineering because of the basic nature of soil and rock materials. They are often highly variable, even within a distance of a few millimetres. Another way of saying this is that soils are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous materials. That is, their material or engineering properties may vary widely from point to point within a soil mass. Furthermore, soils in general are nonlinear materials; their stress-strain curves are not straight lines. To further complicate things (as well as to make them interesting!) soils are nonconservative materials; that is, they have a fantastic memory—they remember almost everything that ever happened to them, and this fact strongly affects their engineering behavior. Instead of being isotropic, soils are typically anisotropic, which means that their material or engineering properties are not the same in all directions. Most of the theories we have for the mechanical behavior of engineering materials assume that the materials are homogeneous and isotropic, and that they obey linear stress- strain laws. Common engineering materials such as steel and concrete do4 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering not deviate too significantly from these ideals, and consequently we can use, with discretion, simple linear theories to predict their response under engineering loads. With soils and rock, we are not so fortunate. As you shall see in your study of geotechnical engineering, we may assume a linear stress-strain response, but then we must apply large empirical correction or “safety” factors to our designs to account for the real material behavior. Furthermore, the behavior of soil and rock materials in situ is often governed or controlled by joints, fractures, weak layers and zones, and other “defects” in the material; yet our laboratory tests and simplified methods of analysis often do not take into account such real characteristics of the soil and rock. That is why geotechnical engineering is really an “art” rather than an engineering science. Successful geotechnical engineering depends on the good judgment and practical experience of the designer, constructor, or consultant. Put another way, the successful geotechnical engineer must develop a “feel” for soil and rock behavior before a safe and economic foundation design can be made or an engineering structure can be safely built. 1.3 SUGGESTED APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Because of the nature of soil and rock materials, both laboratory and field testing are very important in geotechnical engineering. One way that student engineers can begin to develop a feel for soil and rock behavior is to get some experience in the laboratory by performing the standard tests for classification and engineering properties on many different types of soils and rocks. In this way the novice begins building up a “mental data bank” of how certain soils and rocks actually look, how they might behave should, for example, the amount of water present change, how they might behave under different kinds of engineering loads, and what the range of probable numerical values is for the different tests. This is sort of a self-calibration process, so that when you are faced with a new sail deposit or rock type, you will in advance have some idea as to the engineering problems you will encounter at that site. You can also begin to judge, at least qualitatively, the validity of laboratory and field test results for the materials at that site. So laboratory as well as field experience is important for you to help develop a “feel” for soil and rock behavior. Of course, just as with any other subject, this exposure in the laboratory to soil and rock properties and behavior must be complemented by a diligent study of the theoretical, empirical, and design components of geotechnical engineering practice.1.4 SCOPE OF THIS BOOK Rather than attempt an all-inclusive approach to geotechnical en- gineering, the primary emphasis in this text will be on the engineering behavior of soil materials. Soil mechanics and the analysis and design of foundations and earth structures is generally a fairly straightforward, but creative, application of mechanics, strength of materials, and elementary structural engineering, Often the key in the successful practice and applica- tion of geotechnical engineering lies in a sound knowledge and understand- ing of the engineering properties and behavior of soils in situ, when they are subjected to their engincering loads and environmental conditions. Therefore we feel that the beginning student must first develop an appreci- ation for the engineering properties of soils as distinct from other common. civil engineering materials before proceeding to instruction in the analysis and design phases of foundation and earthwork engineering, ‘This is an elementary text, and the approach we have tried to follow is to emphasize the fundamentals, with an eye toward the practical applications that you as a practicing civil engineer are likely to encounter in your engineering practice. Finally, we hope you will know enough about soils and soil deposits to avoid serious mistakes or blunders in those aspects of your professional career that involve soil and soil materials, In the first part of the book, we introduce some of the basic definitions and index properties of soil that are used throughout the book. Then some common soil classification schemes are presented. Classification of soils is important because it is the “language” engineers use to com- municate certain general knowledge about the engineering behavior of the soils at a particular site. The rest of the book is concerned with the ‘engineering properties of soil, properties that are necessary for the design of foundations and earth structures. Topics covered include how water affects soil behavior, their shrinkage and swelling characteristics, and their per- meability (how water flows through soils). Then we get into the compressi- bility of soil, which is the important engineering property one needs to predict the settlement of engineering structures constructed on soil masses. Finally, we describe some of the elementary strength characteristics of both granular and cohesive soils. Soil strength is important, for example, for the design of foundations, retaining walls, and slopes. Much of the practice of geotechnical engineering depends on topics that include geology and the nature of landforms and soil deposits. You are strongly encouraged to take a physical- geology or an engineering geology course in connection with your studies of geotechnical engineer- ing.6 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering It is hoped that with the background of this text, you will be prepared for a follow-up course in foundation and earthwork engineering; you should know how to obtain the soil properties required for most designs, and you should have a pretty good idea as to the probable range of values for a given property if you know the general classification of the soil. Finally, you should have a fairly good idea of what to look for at a site, how to avoid costly and dangerous mistakes, and be aware of your own limitations and knowledge of soils as an engineering material. 1.5 SOIL FORMATION AND THE NATURE. OF SOIL CONSTITUENTS We mentioned earlier that soil from a civil engineering point of view is the relatively loose agglomeration of mineral and organic materials found above the bedrock. In a broader sense, of course, even shallow bedrock is of interest to geotechnical engineers and some of these applica- tions have already been mentioned. You may remember from your basic science courses that the earth has a crust of granitic and basaltic rocks 10 to 40 km thick. Overlying this more or less solid rock is a relatively thin layer of variable thickness of what geologists call unconsolidated materials. These materials can vary in size from sub-microscopic mineral particles to huge boulders. Weathering and other geologic processes act on the rocks at or near the earth’s surface to form these unconsolidated materials, or soil. Weathering, which usually results from atmospheric processes, alters the composition and structure of these rocks by chemical and physical means. Physical or mechanical weathering causes disintegration of the rocks into smaller particle sizes. Physical weathering agents include freezing and thawing, temperature changes, erosion, and the activity of plants and animals including man. Chemical weathering decomposes the minerals in the rocks by oxidation, reduction, carbonation, and other chemical processes. Generally, chemical weathering is much more important than physical weathering in soil formation. In short then, soils are the products of the weathering of rocks. Soils at a particular site can be residual (that is, weathered in place) or transported (moved by water, wind, glaciers, etc.), and the geologic history of a particular deposit significantly affects its engineering behavior. ‘The nature of soil constituents is discussed in greater detail throughout this text. For now, we want to make a few points just to set the stage for what we are about to study. You already have a layman’s idea about soil. At least you know in general what sand and gravel are, and perhaps you even have a general idea about fine-grained soils such as silts and clays. These terms have quite precise engineering definitions, as we shall laterHistorical Development of Geotechnical Engineering 7 see, but for now the general concept that soils are particles will suffice. Particles of what? Well, usually particles of mineral matter or, more simply, broken up pieces of rock that result from the weathering processes we spoke of previously. If we just talk for now about the size of the particles, gravels are small pieces of rock that typically contain several minerals, whereas sands are even smaller and each grain usually contains only a single mineral. If you cannot see each grain of a soil, then the soil is either a silt or a clay or a mixture of each. In fact, natural soils generally are a mixture of several different particle sizes and may even contain organic matter. Some soils such as peat may be almost entirely organic. Futhermore, because soils are a particulate material, they have voids, and the voids are usually filled with water and air. It is the physical and chemical interaction of the water and air in the voids with the particles of soil, as well as the interaction of the particles themselves, that makes soil behavior so complicated and leads to the nonlinear, nonconservative, and anisotropic mechanical behavior we mentioned previously. Now, if you add the variability and heterogeneity of natural soil deposits due to the capriciousness of nature, you probably can begin to see that soils are indeed complex engineering and construction materials. Helping you put some order into this potentially chaotic situation is our primary objective in this book. 1.6 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING As long as people have been building things, they have used soils as a foundation or construction material. The ancient Egyptians, Babylonians, Chinese, and Indians knew about constructing dikes and levees out of the soils found in river flood plains. Ancient temples and monuments built all around the world involved soil and rock in some way. The Aztecs con- structed temples and cities on the very poor soils in the Valley of Mexico tong before the Spaniards arrived in the New World. European architects and builders during the Middle Ages learned about the problems of settlements of cathedrals and large buildings. The most noteworthy exam- ple is, of course, the Leaning Tower of Pisa. Scandinavians used timber piles to support houses and wharf structures on their soft clays. The “design” of foundations and other constructions involving soil and rock was by rule of thumb, and very little theory as such was developed until the mid-1700's. Coulomb is the most famous name of that era. He was interested in the problems of earth pressures against retaining walls, and some of his calculation procedures are still in use today. The most common theory for8 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering the shear strength of soils is named after him. During the next century, the French engineers Collin and Darcy (D'Arcy) and the Scotsman Rankine made important discoveries. Collin was the first engineer to be concerned with failures in clay slopes as well as the measurement of the shear strength of clays. Darcy established his law for the flow of water through sands. Rankine developed a method for estimating the earth pressure against retaining walls. In England, Gregory utilized horizontal subdrains: and compacted earth-fill buttresses to stabilize railroad cut slopes. By the turn of the century, important developments in the field took place in Scandinavia, primarily in Sweden. Atterberg defined the con- sistency limits for clays that are still in use today. During the period 1914-1922, in connection with investigations of some important failures in harbors and railroads, the Geotechnical Commission of the Swedish State Railways developed many important concepts and apparatuses in geotech- nical engineering. Methods for calculating the stability of slopes were developed. They developed subsurface investigation techniques such as weight sounding and piston and other types of samplers. They understood important concepts such as sensitivity of clays and consolidation, which is the squeezing of water out of the pores of the clay. At that time, clays were thought to be absolutely impervious, but the Swedes made field measure- ‘ments to show that they weren't. The Commission was the first to use the word geotechnical (Swedish: geotekniska) in the sense that we know it today: the combination of geology and civil engineering technology. Even with these early developments in Sweden, the father of soil mechanics is really an Austrian, Prof. Karl Terzaghi. He published in 1925 the first modern textbook on soil mechanics, and in fact the name “soil mechanics” is a direct translation of the German word erdbaumechanik, which was part of the title of that book. Terzaghi was an outstanding and very creative engineer. He wrote several important books and over 250 technical papers and articles, and his name will appear many times in this book. He was a professor at Robert College in Istanbul, Technische Hochschule in Vienna, M. I. T., and at Harvard University from 1938 until his retirement in 1956. He continued to be active as a consultant until his death in 1963 at the age of 80. Another important contributor to the advancement of modern soil mechanics is Prof. Arthur Casagrande, who was at Harvard University from 1932 until 1969. You will see his name often in this book because he made many important contributions to the art and science of soil mecha- nics and foundation engineering. Other important contributors to the field include Taylor, Peck, Tschebotarioff, Skempton, and Bjerrum. Since the 1950's the field has grown substantially and the names of those responsible for its rapid advancement are too numerous to mention.1.7, Notes on Symbols and Units s Both Terzaghi and Casagrande began the teaching of soil mechanics and engineering geology in the United States. Before the Second World War, the subject was offered only as a graduate course in very few universities, After the war, it became common for at least one course in the subject to be required in most schools of civil engineering. In recent years graduate programs in all phases of geotechnical engineering have been implemented at many universities, and there has been a real information explosion in the number of conferences, technical journals, and textbooks published during the past two decades. Important recent developments you should know about include de- velopments in earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, the use of digital computers for the solution of complex engineering problems, and the introduction of probability and statistics into geotechnical engineering analysis and design. 1.7 NOTES ON SYMBOLS AND UNITS ‘At the beginning of each chapter, we list the pertinent symbols introduced in the chapter. As with most disciplines, a standard notation is not universal in geotechnical engineering, so we have tried to adopt the symbols most commonly used. For example, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM, 1979) has a list of Standard Definitions of Terms and Symbols Relating to Soil and Rock Mechanics, Designation D 653, which was prepared jointly some years ago with the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the International Society of Rock Mecha- nics (ISRM). Recently the International Society for Soil-Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ISSMFE, 1977) published an extensive list of symbols. Although there are some deviations from this list because of our personal preference, we have generally tried to follow these recommenda- tions Units used in geotechnical engineering can be politely called a mess and, less politely, several worse things. There has developed in practice a jumbled mixture of cgs-metric, Imperial or British Engineering units and hybrid European metric units. With the introduction of the universal and consistent system of units, “Le Systéme International d'Unités” (SI) in the United States and Canada, we believe it is important that you learn to use those units in geotechnical engineering practice. However since British Engineering units are still commonly used, it is important that you become familiar with the typical values of both sets of units. To assist you with unit conversion where necessary, we have included a brief explanation of SI units as applied to geotechnical engineering in Appendix A.Index and Classification Properties of Soils 2.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter we introduce the basic terms and definitions used by geotechnical engineers to index and classify soils. The following notation is used in this chapter. Symbol Dimension Unit Definition 4 = ~ ‘Activity (Eq. 2-23) G = = Coefficient of'curvature (Eq. 2-20) w ale ef 2)> 2 Be 0.893 V, 16 ™ Fig. Ex. 2.26 Index and Classification Properties of Solle can solve for V, directly, or Since V, = V, + V, + V,. we can solve for V,, since we know the other terms. V, = V,— V, — V, = 1.0 — 0.593 ~ 0.160 = 0.247 m? Once the phase diagram has been filled in, solution of the rest of the problem involves just plugging in the respective numbers into the ap- propriate definition equations. We recommend that when you make the computations, you write out the equations in symbol form and then insert the numbers in the same order as written in the equation. Also, it is a good idea to have the units accompany the calculations. Solving for the remainder of the required items is easy. From Eq. 2-9, = $ - 1éMe = 1.6Mg/m* pea or aoe = 0.686 ¥, oh 109 = 227+ 010 199 = 49.7% aa - ote = 39.3% ‘The saturated density p,q, is the density when all the voids are filled with water, that is, when S = 100% (Eq. 2-10). Therefore, if the volume of air V, were filled with water, it would weigh 0.247 m’ x | Mg/m? or 0.247 Mg. Then (0.247 Mg + 0:16 Mg) + 1-6 MB _ 2 1 Mg/m? Another, and perhaps even easier way to solve this example problem, is to assume V, is a unit volume, 1 m?. Then, by definition, M, = p, = 2.7 (when p, is assumed to be equal to 2.70 Mg/m*). The completed phase diagram is shown in Fig. Ex. 2.2c. Since w = M,,/M, = 0.10, M, = 0.27 Mg and M, = M, + M, = 2.97 ‘Mg. Also V, = M,, since p, = 1 Mg/m’; that is, 0.27 Mg of water occupies2.3 Solution of Phase Problems ” a volume of 0.27 m’. Two unknowns remain to be solved before we can proceed: they are V, and V,. To obtain these values, we must use the given information that p = 1.76 Mg/m’. From the definition of total density (Eq. 2-6), M, _ 2.97Mg p= 1.76 Mg/m? Solving for ¥,, 2ST ME 1 688 a? 1.76 Mg/m? Therefore V, = V,— Vy ~ V, = 1.688 ~ 0.27 — 1.0 = 0.418 You can use Fig. Ex. 2.2c to verify that the remainder of the solution is identical to the one using the data of Fig. Ex. 2.2b. Volume (m?) Mass (Ma) Va = 027 ™, 10 vy 270 | ™, Fig. Ex 226 EXAMPLE 2.3 Required: Express the porosity 1 in terms of the void ratio ¢ (Eq. 2-3a) and the void ratio in terms of the porosity (Eq. 2-3b). : Solution: Draw a phase diagram (Fig. Ex. 23a). For this problem, assume V,= 1 (units arbitrary). From Eq. 2-1, V, =e since V, = 1. Therefore V, = 1 + e. From Eq. 2-2, the definition of20 Index and Classification Properties of Solte A w s Fig. Ex. 238 A w s Fig. Ex 2.36 nis V,/V,, or n=—* (2-3a) l+e Equation 2-3b can be derived algebraically or from the phase dia- gram (Fig. Ex. 2.3b). For this case, assume V, = 1 From Eq. 2-2, V, = n since V, = 1. Therefore V, 2-1, the definition of e = V,/¥,. So —n. From Eq, ee (2-30) EXAMPLE 2.4 €=0.62, w=1s% p, 2.65 Mg/m? ¢. w for S = 100% 4. pay for S = 100% Solution: Draw phase diagram (Fig. Ex. 2.4). & Since no volumes are specified, assume V,= 1 mi. Just as in2.8 Solution of Phase Problems a Example 2.3, this makes the V, = e = 0,62 m’ and V,= 1 +e = 1.62 m, From Eq. 2-9, M, ny and M, = ,V, (from Eq. 2-7). So pv, _ Ps een oom ot = i since ¥, = Um in Fig, Ex24 2.65 ° ag 7 1686 Ma/m! Note: The relationship Pe if Pa Tae (2-12) is often very useful in phase problems. Volume (n°) ‘Mass (Mab | x Bis w Ble : i o al. Fig. Ex 24 — j_+ We know that M, = wM, (from Eq. 2-5) and M, = p,¥, _ vt wed, _ esl +) ~ ¥, I¥e since V, = 1m? Plug in the numbers. _ 2.65(1 + 0.15) Pr T+ 02 ‘This relationship is often useful to know. . (1 + w) (+e) = 1.88 Mg/m? (2-13)Index and Classification Properties of Solte Check: (2-14) 1.636 Mg/m? “15 You should verify that p, = p/(1 + w), which is another very useful relationship to remember. c. Water content for $= 100%. From Eq, 2-4, we know that V, = V, = 0.62 m’. From Eq. 2-8, M, = Vp, = 0.62 m? (1 Mg/m*) = 0.62 Mg. Therefore w for $= 100% must be My _ 0.62 Miscuway” Fr 7 355 7 02H 0F 23.4% 4d. Py, From Eq. 2-10, we know py, = (M, + M,)/V,, or 2.65 + 0.62 i 162 Check, by Eq. 2-13: _ PAL + w) _ 2.65(1 + 0.234) ite Te ‘= 2.019 or 2.02 Mg/m? 2.02 Mg/m? EXAMPLE 2.5 Required: Derive a relationship between S, e, w, and p,. Solution: Look at the phase diagram with V, = 1 (Fig. Ex. 2.5). From Eq. 2-4 and Fig. 2.5, we know that V, definitions of water content (Eq. 2-5) and p, (Eq. SV, = Se. Frora the -7), we can place the Volume Wass r Toe Ww 7 a w Me Fath w,¥, t “ft Y s M= 2M Foex26 of 42.3. Solution of Phase Problems as} equivalents for M, and M, on the phase diagram. Since from Eq, 2-8, M, = pV.» we now can write the following equation: My = PV, = WM, = wet, 7 p.Se = wp,v, Since V,= 1m’, 0, Se = wp, (2-15) Equation 2-15 is one of the most useful of all equations for phase problems. You can also verify its validity from the fundamental definitions of p,, S, e, w, and p, ‘Note that using Eq. 2-15 we can write Eq. 2-13 another way: (2-16) (2-17) EXAMPLE 2.6 Given: A silty clay soil with p, = 2700 kg/m’, S = 100%, and the water content = 46%, Required: Compute the void ratio e, the saturated density, and the buoyant or submerged density in kg/m’. Solution: Place given information on a phase diagram (Fig. Ex. 2.6) Assume V,= 1 m’; therefore M, = V,p, = 2700 kg. From Eq. 2-15, we can solve for e directly: _ 9.46 x 2700 pS 1000 1.0 But ¢ also equals V, since V, = 1.0; likewise M, = 1242 kg since M, is ee = 1.24224 Index and Classification Properties of Solis Volume (m?) te z/> aya w als + + $ Fig. Ex. 26 ‘S= 100% numerically equal to V, because p, = 1000 kg/m’. Now that all the unknowns have been found, we may readily calculate the saturated density (Eq. 2-10). (1242 + 2700) kg (also mama We.could also use Eq. 2-17 directly. p, + pee _ 2700 + 1000 (1.242) aca T+ 1.242 ‘When a soil is submerged, the actual unit weight is reduced by the buoyant effect of the water. The buoyancy effect is equal to the weight of the water displaced. Thus, in terms of densities, (Eqs. 2-11 and 2-17): 0" = Paar — Py = 1758 kg/m? — 1000 kg/m? = 758 kg/m? 1758 kg/m? or Ba + Put Tee Psa Pw Ite p’ = 758 kg/m? In this example, p’ is less than the density of water. Go back and look at Table 2-1 for typical values of p’. The submerged or buoyant density of soil will be found to be very important later on in our discussion of consolidation, settlement, and strength properties of soils. (2-18) In summary, for the easy solution of phase problems, you don’t have to memorize lots of complicated formulas. Most of them can easily be2.4 Soll Texture a derived from the phase diagram as was illustrated in the preceding exam- ples. Just remember the following simple rules: 1, Remember the basic definitions of w, ¢, p,, S, ete. 2. Draw a phase diagram. 3. Assume either V, = 1 or ¥, = 1, if not given. 4, Often use p,Se = »p,. 2.4 SOIL TEXTURE So far we haven't said very much about what makes up the “solids” part of the soil mass. In Chapter 1 we gave the usual definition of soil from an engineering point of view: the relatively loose agglomeration of mineral and organic materials found above the bedrock. We briefly described how weathering and other geologic processes act on the rocks at or near the earth's surface to form soil. Thus the solid part of the soil mass consists primarily of particles of mineral and organic matter in various sizes and amounts. The texture of a soil is its appearance or “feel,” and it depends on the relative sizes and shapes of the particles as well as the range or distribution of those sizes. Thus coarse-grained soils such as sands or gravels obviously appear coarse textured, while a fine-textured soil might be composed of predominantly very tiny mineral grains which are invisible to the naked eye. Silts and clay soils are good examples of fine-textured soils. The soil texture, especially of coarse-grained soils, has some relation to their engineering behavior. In fact, soil texture has been the basis for certain soil classification schemes which are, however, more common in agronomy than in soils engineering. Still, textural classification terms (gravels, sands, silts, and clays) are useful in a general sense in geotechnical engineering practice. For fine-grained soils, the presence of water greatly affects their engineering response—much more so than grain size or texture alone, Water affects the interaction between the mineral grains, and this may affect their plasticity and their cohesiveness. Texturally, soils may be divided into coarse-grained versus fine- grained soils. A convenient dividing line is the smallest grain that is visible to the naked eye. Soils with particles larger than this size (about 0.05 mm) are called coarse-grained, while soils finer than the size are (obviously) called fine-grained. Sands and gravels are coarse grained while silts and clays are fine grained. Another convenient way to separate or classify soils is according to their plasticity and cohesion (physics: cohesion—sticking28 Index and Classification Properties of Solts TABLE 2-2 Textural and Other.Characteristics of Soils Gravels, Sands Sits ‘Coarse grained Fine grained | Fine grained Can see individ Cannot see Cannot see ‘ual grains individual individual by eye grains ‘grains Characteristics: | Cobesionless Cohesionless | Cohesive ‘Nonplastic ‘Nonplastic Plastic Granular Granular = Effect of water Relatively unimportant | Important ‘Very important ‘on engineering (exception: loose sat- behavior: lurated granular mater- ils and dynamic loadings) Effect of grain size | Important Relatively Relatively distribution on ‘unimportant | unimportant casinering be together of like materials). For example, sands are nonplastic and non- cohesive (cohesionless) whereas clays are both plastic and cohesive. Silts fall between clays and sands: they are at the same time fine-grained yet nonplastic and cohesionless. These relationships as well as some general engineering characteristics are presented Table 2-2. You will need to obtain some practice, best done in the laboratory, in identifying soils according to texture and some of these other general characteristics such as plasticity and cohesiveness. Also you should note that the term clay refers both to specific minerals called clay minerals (discussed in Chapter 4) and to soils which contain clay minerals. The behavior of some soils is strongly affected by the presence of clay minerals. In geotechnical engineering, for simplicity such soils are usually called clays, but we really mean soils in which the presence of certain clay minerals affects their behavior. 2.5 GRAIN SIZE AND GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ‘As suggested in the preceding section, the size of the soil particle, especially for granular soils, has some effect on engineering behavior. Thus, for classification purposes, we are often interested in the particle or grain sizes present in a particular soil as well as the distribution of those sizes.2.5 Grain Size and Grain Size Distribution ar 7 i Jussi just Fig. 2.3 Grain size ranges according to several engineering soit classification systems (modified after Al-Hussaini, 1977), The range of possible particle sizes in soils is tremendous. Soils can range from boulders or cobbles of several centimetres in diameter down to ultrafine-grained colloidal materials. The maximum possible range is on the order of 10%, so usually we plot grain size distributions versus the logarithm of average grain diameter. Figure 2.3 indicates the divisions between the various textural sizes according to several common engineer ing classification schemes. It should be noted that traditionally in the28 Index and Classification Properties of Sots United States the units for the various sizes depend on the grain size. For materials greater than about $ mm (about 1/4 in.), inches are commonly used, although millimetres could be used just as well. Grain sizes between 5 mm and 0.074 mm are classified according to U.S. Standard sieve number, which of course can be related to a specific grain size as shown in Fig, 2.3. Soils finer than the No. 200 sieve are usually dimensioned in millimetres or, for the very fine-grained colloidal particles, in micrometres. How is the particle size distribution obtained? The process is called ‘mechanical analysis or the gradation test. For coarse-grained soils, a sieve analysis is performed in which a sample of dry soil is shaken mechanically through a series of woven-wire square-mesh sieves with successively smaller ‘openings. Since the total mass of sample is known, the percentage retained or passing each size sieve can be determined by weighing the amount of soil retained on each sieve after shaking. Detailed procedures for this test are specified by ASTM (1980), Designations C 136 and D 422. The corresponding AASHTO (1978) test standards are T 27 and T 88. The U.S. Standard sieve numbers commonly employed for the particle size analysis of soils are shown in Table 2-3. Since soil particles are rarely perfect spheres, when we speak of particle diameters, we really mean an equivalent particle diameter as determined by the sieve analysis. TABLE 2.3 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes and ‘Their Corresponding Open Dimension US. Standard Sieve Opening Sieve No. (mm) 4 475 10 200 20 oss 40 0.425 60 025 100 ous 140 0.106 200 0.075 It turns out that the sieve analysis is impractical for sieve openings less than about 0.05 to 0.075 mm (No. 200 U.S. Standard sieve). Thus for the fine-grained soils, silts, and clays, the hydrometer analysis is commonly used. The basis for this test is Stoke’s law for falling spheres in a viscous fluid in which the terminal velocity of fall depends on the grain diameter and the densities of the grains in suspension and of the fluid. The grain diameter thus can be calculated from a knowledge of the distance and time of fall. The hydrometer also determines the specific gravity (or density) of the suspension, and this enables the percentage of particles of a certain equivalent particle diameter to be calculated. As with the sieve analysis,2.5 Grain Size and Grain Size Distribution 2 the percentage of total sample still in suspension (or already out of suspension) can therefore readily be determined. Detailed procedures for the hydrometer test are given by ASTM (1980), Designation D 422, and AASHTO (1978) Standard Method T 88. The US.BR. (1974) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1970) also have similar standardized procedures for this test. The distribution of the percentage of the total sample less than a certain sieve size or computed grain diameter can be plotted in either a histogram or, more commonly, in a cumulative frequency diagram. The equivalent grain sizes are plotted to a logarithmic scale on the abscissa, whereas the percentage by weight (or mass) of the total sample either passing (finer than) or retained (coarser than) is plotted arithmetically on the ordinate (Fig. 2.4). Note that this figure could just as well be plotted with the smaller grain sizes going towards the right. Some typical grain size distributions are shown in Fig. 2.4. The well-graded soil has a good representation of particle sizes over a wide range, and its gradation curve is smooth and generally concave upward. On the other hand, a poorly graded soil would be one where there is either an excess or deficiency of certain sizes or if most of the particles are about the same size. The uniform gradation shown in Fig. 2.4 is an example of a poorly graded soil. The ‘gap-graded ot skip-graded soil in that figure is also poorly graded; in this case, the proportion of grain sizes between 0.5 and 0.1 mm is relatively low. We could, of course, obtain the usual statistical parameters (mean, median, standard deviation, etc.) for the grain size distributions, but this is more commonly done in sedimentary petrology than in soil mechanics. Of ‘course the range of particle diameters found in the sample is of interest. Besides that, we use certain grain diameters D which correspond to an equivalent “percent passing” on the grain size distribution curve. For example, Dio is the grain size that corresponds to 10% of the sample passing by weight. In other words, 10% of the particles are smaller than the diameter Dio. This parameter locates the grain size distribution curve (GSD) along the grain size axis, and it is sometimes called the effective size. ‘The coefficient of uniformity C, is a crude shape parameter, and it is defined as Deo ‘ c= 2-19) Do 2-19) where Day =grain diameter (in mm) corresponding to 60% passing, and Djo =grain diameter (in mm) corresponding to 10% passing, by weight (or mass). Actually, the uniformity coefficient is misnamed since the smaller the number, the more uniform the gradation. So it is really a coefficient of” Sieve analysis (US. Stendard sieve) 3in (sew 0) 2y6i3m Aq (weys Je8e00) paureies waaay g 8 8 1 Well graded 0.001 100 8 3 g (ssews 40) 2ybiom Aq (ueur souy) Bulssed ruadieg 20 ° Grain diameter (mm) Fig. 24 Typical grain size distributions.