The document discusses allowing the negative to contest the affirmative framework in a debate, forcing the negative to concede the framework with an AFC shell, and discusses fairness, education, and preventing the affirmative from choosing an obscure framework the negative cannot engage with.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views1 page
Incompleteafc Shell
The document discusses allowing the negative to contest the affirmative framework in a debate, forcing the negative to concede the framework with an AFC shell, and discusses fairness, education, and preventing the affirmative from choosing an obscure framework the negative cannot engage with.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
AFC shell
A. Negate should be allowed to run contest the affirmative
framework. B. Forces the negataive to concede the framework wtith AFC. C. 1. Philosophical Education: a. Key to education 2. Strat Skew: a. Key to fairness 3. Predictability a. Key to fairness b. The aff could run some random framework (obscure) 4. Quality of Round 5. Qualitative Ground a. They take away any good arguments I can make, they will pick a framework that I cannot link into. Stronger on the affirmative side D. Fairness Education We wouldnt