Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 300 views

    Inspection Reports For Street Light Poles For Rwalakot.

    Uploaded by

    saqibdar
    The inspection report identified several deficiencies with the street light poles in Rawalakot. The poles were not fabricated by an approved manufacturer and lacked manufacturer name plates. Both the surface and internal galvanization was of poor quality, resulting in rusting. Some poles had silver paint applied instead of proper galvanization. The junction boxes were not securely locked as the drawings lacked detail. Welds were incomplete and dimensions were incorrect. Butt welds were used instead of penetration welds. There was no provision for light attachment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Inspection Reports For Street Light Poles For Rwalakot.

    Uploaded by

    saqibdar
    300 views2 pages
    The inspection report identified several deficiencies with the street light poles in Rawalakot. The poles were not fabricated by an approved manufacturer and lacked manufacturer name plates. Both the surface and internal galvanization was of poor quality, resulting in rusting. Some poles had silver paint applied instead of proper galvanization. The junction boxes were not securely locked as the drawings lacked detail. Welds were incomplete and dimensions were incorrect. Butt welds were used instead of penetration welds. There was no provision for light attachment.

    Original Description:

    FGDGDFG

    Original Title

    Inspection Reports for Street Light Poles for Rwalakot.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The inspection report identified several deficiencies with the street light poles in Rawalakot. The poles were not fabricated by an approved manufacturer and lacked manufacturer name plates. Both the surface and internal galvanization was of poor quality, resulting in rusting. Some poles had silver paint applied instead of proper galvanization. The junction boxes were not securely locked as the drawings lacked detail. Welds were incomplete and dimensions were incorrect. Butt welds were used instead of penetration welds. There was no provision for light attachment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    300 views2 pages

    Inspection Reports For Street Light Poles For Rwalakot.

    Uploaded by

    saqibdar
    The inspection report identified several deficiencies with the street light poles in Rawalakot. The poles were not fabricated by an approved manufacturer and lacked manufacturer name plates. Both the surface and internal galvanization was of poor quality, resulting in rusting. Some poles had silver paint applied instead of proper galvanization. The junction boxes were not securely locked as the drawings lacked detail. Welds were incomplete and dimensions were incorrect. Butt welds were used instead of penetration welds. There was no provision for light attachment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Date: 15-04-09

    INSPECTION REPORT OF STREET LIGHT POLES FOR


    RAWALAKOT.
    DEFICIENCIES.
    1. The light poles are locally fabricated and are not from approved
    manufactures i.e., ELECTRECH (PVT) LTD.
    2. Manufacturers name plate is not mentioned on the pole.
    3. The quality of the galvanization at surface as well as from inside of the
    pole is poor.
    4. Rusting has appeared on the surface, where the galvanization is not
    proper.
    5. Silver paint has been used instead of galvanization is applied to hide the
    rust on the poles, which has starting peeling off.
    6. The detail of locking of junction box is not shown in the drawing and the
    fabrication and methods for locking junction box is poor. The lock should
    be vandal proof.
    7. The continuous welding of joints has not been done.
    8. The dimension of the stiffeners at the base plate is not according to the
    drawing (80mm instead of 100mm.
    9. Reducers used in the poles to reduce size are not according to the
    standard sizes.
    10.Butt weld joints are used to joint one section to other instead of
    penetration welding with additional sleeves.
    11.There is no provision of light attachment and no detail/drawing is
    provided.

    MEP Engineer OCL.

    RE OCL.

    You might also like