Mayoral Candidates Address Island Issues: Inside The Island Eye News
Mayoral Candidates Address Island Issues: Inside The Island Eye News
Mayoral Candidates Address Island Issues: Inside The Island Eye News
PRESORT STANDARD
US POSTAGE PAID
CHARLESTON, SC
PERMIT NO 437
POSTAL PATRON
Volume 10 Issue 18
Sullivans Island
January 2, 2015
FREE
Isle of Palms
Mayoral
candidates
address island
issues
XI I
XI
I
II
X
IX
2014
BY JENNIFER TUOHY
III
I
I
IV
V
PAINTING
WITH
WATERCOLOR
PG 15
RIDING
WITH
STEINBECK
PG 19
RUNNING
WITH
CHARLIE
PG 19
2
Candidates continues from cover
Lynn Pierotti
publisher
[email protected]
Jennifer Tuohy
managing editor
[email protected]
Swan Richards
graphic designer
Lori McGee 614.0901
advertising executive
Sandy England
ad sales
[email protected]
Christian LeBlanc
social media
[email protected]
Steve Rosamilia
photographer
Contributors:
Dimi Matouchev
Sarah Reynolds
Meredith Nelson
Bob Hooper
Published by:
Lucky Dog Publishing
of South Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 837
Sullivans Island, SC 29482
843-886-NEWS
Submit your letters to the editor to:
[email protected]
Future deadline: January 7 for
our January 16 issue
January 2, 2015
Coyotes represent a deadly threat to our beloved
turtlesthey eat the turtle eggs.
My opponent wants to study the coyote problem
for another year, which prevents our children and
pets from playing freely and safely in their own
backyards. Government has an obligation to act
when its residents, their pets and our guests are at
risk. We must provide a safe environment.
Do you think trees in the accreted land
should be cut or trimmed to allow residents to
have better views of the ocean?
Patrick ONeil: The protected accreted land is an
incredible resource for the Island and beyond. I
have said for years that as the owner of this land,
the Town should be a good steward and a good
neighbor. As chair of the Land Use and Natural
Resources Committee I have been at the forefront of
efforts to better manage this priceless resource. As
everyone knows, this is a consistently contentious
issue and efforts to address it have met with a
number of obstacles, but I am optimistic that we
can soon arrive at a workable and responsible plan.
I favor a scientifically based management plan
that will enhance the diversity and health of this
ecosystem as a whole, not just protect a favored few
species. While I dont believe we should sacrifice
this resource to provide ocean views, a sensible
management plan is not necessarily incompatible
with improved views in many cases. First, we
should get rid of non-native invasive species (e.g.
Chinese tallow, wisteria) that can crowd out native
vegetation and themselves impede views and
breezes. Second, as we encourage a diversity of
environments within the protected land, some view
lines can be improved for residents of neighboring
properties. Third, while I certainly do not support
clear-cutting, the plan to more aggressively manage
the band of the accreted land immediately adjacent
to private property should also help views.
Keith Blandford: Regarding tree management
on the accreted land, the question is, who would
be paying for the service? If the Town is already
borrowing money and paying interest on debt, as
well as proposing more government programs that
will require additional borrowing, how are we, as a
community, going to pay for yet another program?
Candidates continues on page 6
Civic Calendar
Advisory Committee
12 noon
1207 Palm Boulevard
Tuesday, January 6
Recreation Committee
9 a.m.
1207 Palm Boulevard
Monday, January 12
Real Property Committee
5:30 p.m.
1207 Palm Boulevard
Personnel Committee
10 a.m.
1207 Palm Boulevard
Wednesday, January 14
Planning Commission
4:30 p.m.
1207 Palm Boulevard
Wednesday, January 7
Public Safety Committee
9 a.m.
1207 Palm Boulevard
Accommodations Tax
Monday, January 5
Council Workshop
6 p.m.
2050-B Middle Street
* Bench Trials will be at a temporary Town Hall facility located behind the Fire Station, next to the Stith
Park (2050 Middle Street). Contact SI Clerk of Court directly at 883-5734 (Maria LoRusso) for payments
or questions.
h
s
4
Candidates continues from page 3
Until the government learns to live within its means, we should not
contemplate implementing or increasing the scope of any government
programs, including the existing accreted land management program.
Jerry Kaynard: The Town has not yet adopted a management plan,
while the size of the accreted land has increased substantially with
unmanaged growth since 1991. Town Council has agreed to remove
15 invasive species, create two educational walking paths, conduct
periodic clean-up walkabouts, clear emergency paths and allow
adjacent landowners to clear their beach footpaths. Council has also
agreed to create a transition buffer zone between the accreted land
and adjacent landowners and remove myrtles which are overgrown
and overwhelming all other species.
Adjacent landowners constitute a neighborhood with specific
problems and needs. Council should be good neighbors and be
responsive to their needs. Public posturing should be replaced by
constructive suggestions. With about 200 acres of accreted land, we
can protect every kind of environment , ranging from mature maritime
forest to dune fields for bird nesting and wildflowers.
I have been designated as a negotiator by Town Council on the
accreted land and I have been talking to all stakeholders to seek a
compromise and a community consensus. I am against clear cutting.
I am for protecting Grand Trees, all Palmettos, and many other smaller
trees. I also recognize that scenic views and breezes are valuable
natural resources to be enhanced and preserved. Pruning, cutting or
limbing-up trees is recommended by experts as best practices as part
of a good management plan.
An understandable, two or three page plan can be presented to
Council and to residents for discussion and review within 60 days
and voted on within 90 days. My opponent has been studying this
issue for several years trying to draft a 200 page doctoral thesis
without any results. We can do better and we shall.
If elected Mayor would you vote to implement a paid, managed
parking plan for the island?
Patrick ONeil: I would support the right plan at the right time, and
as a member of the Public Safety Committee I have been active in
our efforts to develop that plan. The population of the tri-county
January 2, 2015
area is exploding. More and more people want to visit the beach,
but the Island is not getting any bigger. We must manage growing
pressures from traffic, parking and congestion. A program of paid
parking will at some point be a necessary component of such efforts,
particularly if the Isle of Palms implements such a plan. The purpose
is not to charge visitors for the beach, but simply to recoup some
of the increased costs to the Town of providing public safety and
other infrastructure required by growing numbers of visitors. Paid
parking can also be a way to slow down the increase in the numbers
of vehicles on the streets.
We also should look at other ways to reduce the numbers of vehicles.
One idea I am continuing to pursue is a live online traffic camera
showing current traffic conditions on the causeway. In addition to
giving useful information to our residents, on busy days potential
visitors might decide that the traffic conditions make a trip to the
beach seem less inviting.
Keith Blandford: When considering the paid parking issue, visualize
being ticketed or having your car towed when you park in front of
your own home. No matter what the government says at first, I am
certain that we locals will eventually be required to get decals for
ourselves, and even for people visiting our homes. Inevitably, it will
turn into yet another way for the government to squeeze money out
of residents. It will also require yet another paid government position
(or sub-contractor) to drive around and check cars and write tickets
or tow vehicles.
One of the motives behind the paid parking plan is try and
discourage visitors to the Island, and I do not believe it will be
effective. I completely understand the safety concerns associated with
the island traffic; however, this is not a function of paid parking, but
of infrastructure. This problem is serious enough to re-approach the
DOT and local road builders to start figuring out a way to solve our
access to and from the island. Paid parking is treating the symptom
and not the disease. We will need to be creative in our parking
solutions and should consider ideas like allowing private property
lots for parking, consolidated parking areas, etc. until a long term
traffic flow solution is developed.
Jerry Kaynard: I do not want to charge people to park at the beach.
www.islandeyenews.com
January 2, 2015
improve communication with residents?
January 2, 2015
CIVIC
ullivans
councilmember
Jerry Kaynard is seeking
solutions to the islands
traffic, congestion and increasing
parking problems for the next
summer beach season. Car traffic
coming to the beach is increasing
due to explosive growth in
Mount Pleasant and neighboring
communities.
Kaynard, as Mayor Pro Tem,
has engaged Mayor Page of Mt.
Pleasant and Mayor Cronin of
Dont
forget
to
vote on Tuesday,
Jan. 6. Check www.
islandeyenews.com
for results and follow
us on Facebook and
Twitter.
www.islandeyenews.com
January 2, 2015
XI I
XI
IX
2014
II
III
I
I
IV
V
www.islandeyenews.com