The Influence of Parental Attitude and Behavior On Early Adolescent Cigarette Smoking

Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

University of Nebraska - Lincoln

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska Lincoln


Educational Psychology Papers and Publications Educational Psychology, Department
of

1-1-1989

The Influence of Parental Attitude and


Behavior
on
Early
Adolescent
Cigarette Smoking
Ian Newman

University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected]

Jolene M. Ward

Deaconess Hospital, St. Louis, MO

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers


Part of the Educational Psychology Commons

Newman, Ian and Ward, Jolene M., "The Influence of Parental Attitude and Behavior on Early Adolescent
Cigarette Smoking" (1989). Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. Paper 98.
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/98

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Psychology, Department of at
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Psychology Papers and
Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.

Published in Journal of School Health 59:4 (1989), pp. 150152. Copyright 1989 American School Health
Association;
published by Wiley-Blackwell. Used by permission.
Submitted November 28, 1988; accepted February 27, 1989.

The Influence of Parental Attitude and Behavior on


Early Adolescent Cigarette Smoking
Ian M. Newman,

PhD, FASHA, Professor, Health Education and Director, Nebraska Prevention Center for
Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 225 Coliseum, University of NebraskaLincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0138

Jolene M. Ward,

MEd, RN, Staff Nurse, Deaconess Hospital, 6150 Oakland, St. Louis, MO 63139

Abstract
In 1983, Nolte and colleagues reported parental attitude may be more powerful than parental behavior in
shaping adolescent cigarette smoking behavior. This study replicates the finding of Nolte et al. and suggests
parents need to be actively recruited to discourage their children from smoking, regardless of their own
behavior. Fewer parents actively discourage youth smoking today than in 1983, a possible unfortunate result
from on apparently successful effort to change the public attitude toward cigarette smoking.

Parental smoking behavior and its relationship to adolescent cigarette smoking behavior has been studied
extensively. The effect of parental attitude on adolescent smoking, however, has received less attention, and
the effect of the combination of parental attitude and behavior largely has been ignored. One notable
exception was the study by Nolte and colleagues. 1 They concluded that while parental attitude and behavior
affected adolescent smoking behavior, the joint effects were much more powerful than previously noticed,
and that attitude may be the more powerful of the two.
Smoking habits established in adolescence tend to prevail into later years. Kandel and Logan 2 suggested
cigarette usage rates for both male and female adolescents increase at age 12 and rise consistently through
age 18. Thus, understanding patterns of initiation and identification of factors related to initiation become
important to those interested in reducing the rate at which young people begin the smoking habit.
Basing parental smoking behavior on the reports of their children and inferring parental attitude from
adolescents reports on how upset parents were or would be if they smoked, Nolte et al. 1 reported that when
both parents smoked and were not upset if their adolescents smoked, 51.6% of their adolescents smoked.
When smoking parents were upset if their adolescents smoked, only 10.4% of their adolescents reported
smoking. For nonsmoking parents who were upset at the prospect of their children smoking, only 5.3% of
their children reported smoking. When nonsmoking parents did not object to their children smoking, 23.3%
reported smoking (Table 1).
If parents attitudes toward smoking exert such an effect on subsequent smoking patterns of their
adolescents, then health educators need to design strategies to encourage parents to express their
nonaccepting attitudes.
This paper reports a replication of findings from Nolte et al. 1 with data from students in grades seven and
eight from a different population. The sample described in this paper included 735 students from 12 schools
in and around one moderately sized midwestern city who were significantly younger than those in Noltes
sample: students ages 13-14 compared to Noltes 5,411 students in grades 7-12.
Definitions also differed slightly from those used by Nolte et al. Students were classified as smokers if they
had smoked more than two cigarettes. Measures of parental attitude were derived from a question asking,
With regards to my smoking cigarettes, my parents/guardian would: threaten to punish me if I smoked; have
told me never to smoke; havent told me how they feel if I smoke; have told me they dont care if I smoke.
Nolte and colleagues explored the influence of individual parents. Due to the smaller sample, this study only

explored the effect of both parents disapproving. One parent approving and one disapproved was classified
as indifferent.
Findings
Almost one-half (49.8%) the students in this sample reported neither parent smoked; 15.4% reported both
parents smoked. When only one parent smoked, it was more likely to be the father (21.2%) than the mother
(13.5%) (Table 2).
Parental Behavior. In this sample, 18.5% of adolescents were smokers. Among the adolescents who were
nonsmokers. 46.8% reported one or more parent smoked. Among the smokers 66.2% reported smoking by
one or more parents (x 2 + p < .004).
Parental Attitudes. Almost two-thirds of the students (65.8%) reported both parents would be upset and
would disapprove if they smoked (threatened to punish them,
150

Parental attitude and early adolescent cigarette smoking

Both
10.4 51.8 1162 Both
18.8 32.5 104
Smoke Table 1. Youth Smoking
Smoke
Behavior by Parental
55.5 23.7
81.3 67.5 (15.
Attitudes
and(21.5)
4) 1983)
Parental Behaviors (Modified from Nolte et al.,
Only
8.6 39.1 711 Only
19.2 18.4
90
Both(13.1)
Neither
Mother Parental
63.0 37.7
Mother
80.8 81.6 (13.
smokes Behavior Disapprove
smokes
5)
Disapprove
Totals
Only
6.8
53.1 Smokers
1045 Only
32.0
142
% Regular
% Regular 25.0
Smokers
Frequencies
Father
61.9 24.7 (19.3) Father
75.0 %
68.0
% Never Smokers
Never(21.
Smokers
smokes
smokes
2)
(Percents)
Neither
Neither
5.3 23.3 2491
10.3 17.8 333
smokes
smokes
53.1
(46.1)
89.7do82.2
(49. 100%
* 69.2
Parental
disapproval
percentages
not equal
because cases where one parent disapproved and8)one was
indifferent (mixed attitude) are omitted.

or told them never to smoke). No significant


difference existed in attitudes of parents of males or
females. Two-thirds (67.9%) of nonsmokers and
55.6% of smokers reported their parents were or
would be upset with their smoking. Adolescent
cigarette smoking in this sample was related to
parental attitude expressed as disapproval (x 2 =
6.82, p < .009).
Parental Attitude and Behavior. The data in
Table 2 shows that when neither parent smoked and
both disapproved of their adolescents smoking,
10.3% of their adolescents smoked. Holding attitude
constant, both parents having a negative attitude
toward their adolescent smoking, but with both
parents as smokers, the percentage of smoking
adolescents increased to 18.8%. When neither
parent smoked and parents were indifferent toward
their adolescent smoking, 17.8% of their adolescents
smoked. Again, holding attitude constant, parents
indifferent, but with both parents as smokers, the
number of smoking adolescents increased to 32.5%.
Discussion
Nolte and colleagues observed a twofold difference
in the proportion of adolescent smokers and
nonsmokers when both parents smoked compared to
nonsmoking parents (21.9% 46.1%). This study
showed a threefold difference in the proportion of
smokers when both parents smoked compared to
when neither parent smoked (15.4% 49.8%).
Nolte et al. reported a fivefold difference in the
proportion of smoking adolescents when smoking
parents
disapproved
of
adolescent
smoking
compared to when they were indifferent (10.4%
51.6%). These data suggest a twofold difference of
18.8% 32.5%. Similarly, Nolte et al. noted that
nonsmoking parents who disapproved of smoking
were less likely to have smoking adolescents than

indifferent nonsmoking parents (5.3% 23.3%). This


study suggested a smaller difference; smoking
parents who disapproved had 10.3% smoking
adolescents compared to indifferent smoking parents
who had 17.8% smoking adolescents.
Table 2.Youth Smoking Behavior by Parental
Attitudes and
Parental Behaviors (this study)
Parental Both Parents
Behavior Disapprove Indifferent

Totals

% Regular Smokers % Regular Smokers Frequencies


% Never Smokers % Never Smokers
(Percents)

Nolte et al. reported a tenfold synergistic relationship


between parental attitude and behavior in
adolescent smoking. When both parents disapproved
and did not smoke, 5.3% of their adolescents
smoked. When both parents were indifferent and
smoked, 51.6% of their adolescents smoked. These
results are similar but in the magnitude of a
threefold difference. Nonsmoking parents who
disapproved had 10.3% of their adolescents
smoking, while smokers who were indifferent had
32.5% of their youngsters smoking.
While the magnitude of differences in this study
generally were less than differences reported by
Nolte et al., the direction and magnitude of these
differences still were significant. These results
replicate the 1983 results reported by Nolte and
colleagues.
One result of concern from this study involves the
apparent increase in permissiveness of parents
toward their adolescents smoking. As students in
this study were junior high school rather than junior
and senior high school students on which Nolte et al.
based their results, it was anticipated that a greater
degree of parental disapproval of cigarette smoking
would be expressed to these younger adolescents.

This result was not found. Nolte et al indicated


18.2% of their sample reported that both parents
were not upset or were indifferent in their attitudes
toward their adolescents cigarette smoking. These
data show 34.2% of the sample reporting parents as
indifferent. The more accepting attitude of parents
represents one possible reason why the magnitude
of differences between behavior and attitude
reported here were less than Nolte et al observed.
Parental attitude may not be as salient to
adolescents today as in 1983.
Conclusion
From an educational perspective, these results and
the findings of Nolte et al. suggest two important
points. Parental attitude, when expressed, appears
to be important in moderating adolescent smoking
behavior regardless of parents smoking behavior.
Many parents suggest they are un

152

S
c
h
o
ol

n
e
w
m
a
n

h
e
al
t
h

&
w

5
9
(
1
9
8
9
)

ar
d
in

o
u
r
n
al
o

able to tell their youngsters not to smoke when they


smoke because of the apparent hypocrisy. Clearly,
these two studies suggest parents expressed
opposition does affect smoking behavior, regardless
of actual parental behavior. Parents should he
encouraged to clearly express their opposition to
risky behaviors such as cigarette smoking.
The second point involves the apparent increase
in permissiveness of parents. Today, even more than
in 1983, the dangers of cigarettes are documented
by the scientific community, and accepted by
parents and community members. Why are more
parents indifferent in their attitudes toward their
adolescents smoking? Perhaps the very changes in
public attitude, accepting the dangers of smoking
and establishment of policies that discourage
smoking, led parents to feel the antismoking
message is clear and they no longer need to state
the obvious to their youngsters.
Fishbein and Ajzen 3 pointed out that a generic
message such as smoking is bad for health proves
less effective at influencing a behavior than a
specific and personal message such as MY smoking
is bad for MY health. The increasing acceptance of a
generic message may be decreasing the number of
more effective personal messages, and hence the
effectiveness of the message may be decreased.

This study suggests school personnel can recruit an


effective allyparentsin their efforts to decrease
the rate of adolescent cigarette smoking. These data
suggest parents should be encouraged to express
their objection to youth smoking in increasing
numbers and to do so regardless of their own
smoking behavior.

References

1.

Nolte, A. E., Smith, B. J., ORourke, T. The relative


importance of parental attitudes and behavior
upon youth smoking behavior. J Sch Health 1983;
53(4):261-271.

2.

Kandel, D. B., Logan, J. A. Patterns of drug use


from adolescent to young adulthood: I. Periods of
risk for initiation, continued use and
discontinuation. Am J Public Health 1984;
74(7):660-665.

3.

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention


and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and
Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975, pp.
216284.

You might also like