0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Vandv: 1 The Relation Between

This document summarizes key concepts regarding stability conditions for control systems and class KL functions. It discusses that for exponential stability, the time derivative of V must be less than or equal to a negative constant times V. It also clarifies that the function f(r,s)=rce^-s is a valid class KL function, as it is increasing in r and decreasing in s, even for values of r between 0 and 1. Through examples, it shows that f(r,s) increases as r increases, satisfying the requirements of a class KL function.

Uploaded by

kapilkumar18
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Vandv: 1 The Relation Between

This document summarizes key concepts regarding stability conditions for control systems and class KL functions. It discusses that for exponential stability, the time derivative of V must be less than or equal to a negative constant times V. It also clarifies that the function f(r,s)=rce^-s is a valid class KL function, as it is increasing in r and decreasing in s, even for values of r between 0 and 1. Through examples, it shows that f(r,s) increases as r increases, satisfying the requirements of a class KL function.

Uploaded by

kapilkumar18
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

EE 650 - Basics of Modern Control Systems

This is for the confusion that aroused in lecture held on November 08, 2014 (Saturday).

1 The relation between V and V


For exponential stability we have the following conditions imposed on V (t, x)
k1 kxka V (t, x) k2 kxka
V k3 kxka

(1)
(2)

where k1 , k2 , k3 and a are positive constants. From (2) we have


V k3 kxka
V k3 kxka [ multiplying (-1) on both sides flips the inequality]
V
kxka [ divide by positive constant k3 on both sides]

k3
k2 V

k2 kxka [ multiply by positive constant k2 on both sides]


k3
From (1) we have
V k2 kxka .
Hence, we have
k2 V
k2 kxka V
k3
k2 V

V
k3
k3
k3
V V [ multiply both sides by ]
k2
k2
k
3
V V [ multiply both sides by 1]
k2

So

k3
V V.
k2

2 f (r, s) = rces is a class KL function


Towards the end of the class it was pointed out in a discussion that r c may not be increasing if
0 r < 1 for c > 0. It is not true.
f
Fix s.
= cr c1es > 0. So f (r, s) is a strictly increasing function in r. It is infact a class
r
K function in r.
1

f
= r c es < 0. So f (r, s) is decreasing in s. Hence, f (r, s) = r c es is a class KL
Fix r.
s
function.
Since the doubt was raised for 0 r < 1 lets see a few cases.
Let c = 2, s = 0. This is a simple case. When r = 0.01, f (r, s) = 0.0001 and when r = 0.1,
f (r, s) = 0.01. So r has increased and so has the value of f (r, s). Now let c = 0.5, s = 0.
When r = 0.0001, f (r, s) = 0.01 and when r = 0.01, f (r, s) = 0.1. Again as r increased,
f (r, s) also increased.

You might also like