0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

B G B G: - The Way G Operates On Stress Is Different From That of G - Eq (4) States Co

The document discusses how Cauchy stress and first Piola-Kirchhoff stress transform under coordinate rotations. It states that for isotropic materials, the response function relating stress to strain is independent of the coordinate system, but for anisotropic materials the response function depends on the orientation of the coordinate system. Equations (1)-(4) and (1)-(3) demonstrate how the response function changes from g to g* and from h to h* under coordinate rotations for Cauchy stress and first Piola-Kirchhoff stress, respectively, while maintaining coordinate invariance as shown in equations (4) and (4).

Uploaded by

rd_mech
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

B G B G: - The Way G Operates On Stress Is Different From That of G - Eq (4) States Co

The document discusses how Cauchy stress and first Piola-Kirchhoff stress transform under coordinate rotations. It states that for isotropic materials, the response function relating stress to strain is independent of the coordinate system, but for anisotropic materials the response function depends on the orientation of the coordinate system. Equations (1)-(4) and (1)-(3) demonstrate how the response function changes from g to g* and from h to h* under coordinate rotations for Cauchy stress and first Piola-Kirchhoff stress, respectively, while maintaining coordinate invariance as shown in equations (4) and (4).

Uploaded by

rd_mech
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

g b

g * b

(1)

QQT g * QbQT

(2)

Qg b QT g * QbQT

(3)
(4)

Cauchy stress is obtained from a response function, g, as per


equation (1). Now the co-ordinate system is rotated. The stress
and left Cauchy stretch tensor in the new co-ordinate system are
transformed as given in equations (2) and (3). In the new coordinate system, the response function is different, it is g*. The way
g operates on stress is different from that of g*. Eq (4) states coordinate invariance.
If material is isotropic then the response function is same and is
independent of co-ordinate system. For an anisotropic material it
depends on orientation.

P hF

(1)

P h* F

(2)

QP h* QF

(3)

QhF h* QF (4)
Here also, similar logic. Here the stress is 1st PK stress. The stress is
obtained from a response function, h, as per equation (1). Now
the co-ordinate system is rotated. The stress and deformation
gradient in the new co-ordinate system are transformed as given in
equations (2) and (3). In the new co-ordinate system, the response
function is different, it is h*. The way h operates on stress is
different from that of h*. Eq (4) states co-ordinate invariance.
If material is isotropic then the response function is same and is
independent of co-ordinate system. For an anisotropic material it
depends on orientation. Is this correct?

You might also like