0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views

Attribute Measurement Study: A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3

This document presents the results of an attribute measurement study conducted on three appraisers - Appraiser A, B, and C. It shows that all three appraisers qualified the three acceptance criteria of having an effectiveness above 0.9, probability of false alarm below 0.05, and probability of miss below 0.02. It also provides the numbers of total correct decisions, false alarms, and miss decisions made by each appraiser. In conclusion, all three appraisers were approved based on meeting the acceptance criteria.

Uploaded by

shuklahouse
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views

Attribute Measurement Study: A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3

This document presents the results of an attribute measurement study conducted on three appraisers - Appraiser A, B, and C. It shows that all three appraisers qualified the three acceptance criteria of having an effectiveness above 0.9, probability of false alarm below 0.05, and probability of miss below 0.02. It also provides the numbers of total correct decisions, false alarms, and miss decisions made by each appraiser. In conclusion, all three appraisers were approved based on meeting the acceptance criteria.

Uploaded by

shuklahouse
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

APPRAISER A: Laly Saji (2462) MAY'07

APPRAISER B: Sheela Roi (2758)


APPRAISER C: OmanaK J (2659)
Part A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3
1
2
3 X
4
5
6
7
8 X
9 X
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 X X X X X X X X X
17 X X X X X X X X X
18 X X X X X X X X X
19 X X X X X X X X X
20 X X X X X X X X X
21 X X X X X X X X X
22 X X X X X X X X X
23 X X X X X X X X X
24 X X X X X X X X X
25 X X X X X X X X X
26 X X X X X X X X X
27 X X X X X X X X X
28 X X X X X X X X
29 X X X X X X X X X
30 X X X X X X X X X
31
32 X
33 X
34 X X
35 X
36
37
38
39 X X X X X X X X X
40 X X X X X X X X
41 X X X X X X X X X
42 X X X X X X X X X
43 X X X X X X X X X
44 X X X X X X X X X
45 X X X X X X X X X
RESULT:-
ALL THE INSPECTORS HAVE QUALIFIED THE THREE ACCEPTANCE CRITREIAS
Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
>0.90 0.80-0.90 <0.80
<0.05 0.05-0.10 >0.10
<0.02 0.02-0.05 >0.05
ATTRIBUTE MEASUREMENT STUDY
TOTAL OPPORTUNITY FOR CORRECT DECISION
TOTAL OPPORTUNITY FOR FALSE ALARM
TOTAL OPPORTUNITY FOR MISS DECISION
APPROVED BY:-
135
69
66
0 0.015151515
0.977777778 0.97037037
0.028985507 0.043478261
2 3 3
0.043478261
0 1
135 135 135
65 66 65
132 131
EFFECTIVENESS (E)
PROBABILITY OF FALSE ALARM (Pfa)
PROBABILITY OF MISS (Pm)
67
132
1
0.977777778
0.015151515
NUMBER OF TOTAL CORRECT(CN)=(GN+NB)
NUMBER OF FALSE ALARM (NF)
NUMBER OF MISS (NM)
NUMBER TOTAL (TN)= (GN+NB+NF+NM)
Appraiser B Appraiser C Appraiser A
NUMBER OF GOOD-CORRECT (GN)
NUMBER OF BAD-CORRECT(NB)
66 66
FRM/TQ/37 REV. NO. "00"
A B C
G Correct 67 66 66
Difference 2 3 3
False Alarm G Wrong 2 3 3
B Correct 65 66 65
Difference 1 0 1
Miss B Wrong 1 0 1
Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
>0.90 0.80-0.90 <0.80
<0.05 0.05-0.10 >0.10
<0.02 0.02-0.05 >0.05
FRM/TQ/37 REV. NO. "00"

You might also like