100% found this document useful (1 vote)
4K views1 page

Nike Competitive Profile Matrix 2014

Nike, Adidas, and Puma are analyzed based on critical success factors such as market share, global expansion, revenues, innovation, marketing, brand name, financial strength, customer loyalty, and R&D. Nike is rated highest with a weighted score of 3.9 out of 4, making it the most competitive. Adidas receives a weighted score of 3.1, indicating it is Nike's toughest competitor. Puma receives the lowest weighted score of 2.

Uploaded by

Haroon Pasha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
4K views1 page

Nike Competitive Profile Matrix 2014

Nike, Adidas, and Puma are analyzed based on critical success factors such as market share, global expansion, revenues, innovation, marketing, brand name, financial strength, customer loyalty, and R&D. Nike is rated highest with a weighted score of 3.9 out of 4, making it the most competitive. Adidas receives a weighted score of 3.1, indicating it is Nike's toughest competitor. Puma receives the lowest weighted score of 2.

Uploaded by

Haroon Pasha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

NIKE COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX (CPM) 2014

FINDINGS:
Critical success
factors
Nike Adidas Puma
Market share 33.2% 25% 8%
Global expansion 170 countries 200 countries 120 countries
Marketing $ 2,711 millions $ 2062.85 $ 836.81
Revenues $ 24128 $ 20416.14 $ 9248.44
R&D (amount not found) $ 175.8 $ 116.60
Financial strength $ 2,223 (net income) $ 721.65 (net income) $ 109.90 (net income)
Brand name To be taken on revenues
Innovation
Customer loyalty To be taken on revenues

CPM Competitive Profile
Matrix
NIKE ADIDAS PUMA
Critical Success Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Rating Weighted
Score
Rating Weighted
Score
Market Share 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 2 0.3
Global expansion 0.1 3 0.3 4 0.4 2 0.2
Revenues 0.1 4 0.4 3 0.3 2 0.2
Innovation 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 2 0.3
Marketing/ Advertising 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 2 0.3
Brand Name 0.1 4 0.4 3 0.3 2 0.2
Financial strength 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1
Customer Loyalty 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1
Research & Development 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 2 0.3
Total 1 3.9 3.1 2

ANALYSIS:
The above mentioned competitive profile matrix reflects that Nike is the most competitive of
the all with the weighted score of 3.9, whereas Adidas Group is the toughest competitor for
Nike Inc.

You might also like