Scribd
Upload
43 views3 pages

Week 3 Week 5: ASSIGNMENTS 1 (Individual Task)

This assignment requires students to: 1) Select two similar websites and write a comparative review of no more than 2,000 words with no more than 5 headings. The review should focus on unique features, important similarities, and include screenshots. 2) Create a 2-page presentation aid summarizing the written review. 3) Give a 3-minute public presentation demonstrating one of the websites and providing a verbal critique. The presentation will be assessed based on identification of website aims, features, design issues, navigation, content, writing quality, and presentation aids.

Uploaded by

AdrinaG-b
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views3 pages

Week 3 Week 5: ASSIGNMENTS 1 (Individual Task)

This assignment requires students to: 1) Select two similar websites and write a comparative review of no more than 2,000 words with no more than 5 headings. The review should focus on unique features, important similarities, and include screenshots. 2) Create a 2-page presentation aid summarizing the written review. 3) Give a 3-minute public presentation demonstrating one of the websites and providing a verbal critique. The presentation will be assessed based on identification of website aims, features, design issues, navigation, content, writing quality, and presentation aids.

Uploaded by

AdrinaG-b
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ASSIGNMENTS 1 (Individual Task)

Issued: Week 3
Due / Presentation: Week 5
Description
Your task in this assignment is to select two websites which has been designed for
information presentation around a similar theme and to write a comparative review of
them.
Submission Reuirements
The submission consists of 3 components:
1. Written Review (minimum 2!! words" # $! marks
Write a review of %our chosen sites incorporating criteria discussed in the tools
presented in week $. &e selective about the criteria which are relevant to %our chosen
product and do not adhere slavishl% to them. This is a written review rather than a
report. Your review should be cohesive and well written' using no more than ( headings
to identif% separate sections within it. )ocus on the features which are uni*ue or
di+erent about each site as well as the most important similarities. ,se screen
captures in %our review to avoid e-cessive description.
2. .resentation /ids # 2 0arks
.rovide an aid for %our presentation. The aids should summari1e %our writing.
3. .ublic .resentation # 3 0arks
You are re*uired to demonstrate %our chosen site to the class' conducting a verbal
criti*ue of it as %ou do so.
Assessment Summar!
This assignment will be marked according to the following criteria:
1
2denti3cation of aims of the product and the techni*ues used to present the
information.
2denti3cation of the important features to review.
4iscussion of screen design and aesthetic issues (color' la%out etc".
4iscussion of interface and navigation issues (structure etc".
4iscussion of content (accurac%' completeness etc".
.ersonal comments5criti*ue.
6ualit% of writing (st%le' spelling' grammar etc".
.resentation (correct referencing where appropriate' use of screen captures etc".
6ualit% of presentation aids.
6ualit% of public presentation.
CONTENT:
1. Acknowledgement
2. Introduction
3. Aim of Product
4. User Rating Tools
(Coose an! "#
$. Personal Comment
". Conclusion
%. References
2
3

You might also like