Different Methods of Collecting Information Method Advantages Disadvantages
This document outlines and compares different methods for collecting information, including surveys (mail, group-administered, telephone), interviews, focus groups, observations, student records, and collection of materials. Each method is described in terms of its advantages and disadvantages. For example, mail surveys can survey many people inexpensively but have low response rates, while interviews provide detailed data but are time-consuming and expensive.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views1 page
Different Methods of Collecting Information Method Advantages Disadvantages
This document outlines and compares different methods for collecting information, including surveys (mail, group-administered, telephone), interviews, focus groups, observations, student records, and collection of materials. Each method is described in terms of its advantages and disadvantages. For example, mail surveys can survey many people inexpensively but have low response rates, while interviews provide detailed data but are time-consuming and expensive.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLLECTING INFORMATION
METHOD ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Surveys (Mail) Can survey many people Not time-consuming Relatively inexpensive Everyone gets the same instrument Objective interpretation Difficult to get much detail Sometimes difficult to get correct addresses May be problems with interpreting questions Sometimes a problem getting surveys completed and returned Surveys (Group- Administered)
Can survey many people Not time-consuming Relatively inexpensive Everyone gets the same instrument Object interpretation Relatively inexpensive May be problems with interpreting questions Difficult to get much detail Surveys (Telephone) Able to ask for more detail when needed Everyone gets the same instrument Sometimes difficult reaching people Lack of anonymity Interviews Researcher can know how people are interpreting questions Able to ask for more detail when needed Provide detailed data Time-consuming Because of time, can limit sample size Subjective interpretation Can be expensive Can be difficult to analyze Focus Groups Researcher can know how people are interpreting questions Able to interview multiple people at one time, thus, more cost-effective Responses from one person provide stimulus for other people Group setting may inhibit some individuals from providing information Sometimes hard to coordinate multiple schedules Responses from one person provide stimulus for other people Observations Objective interpretation Low burden for people providing data Time-consuming Some items are not observable Can be expensive Participant behavior may be affected by observer presence Student Records Objective interpretation Low burden for people providing data Relatively inexpensive May not correspond to exactly what researcher wants May be incomplete or require additional interpretation May need special permission to use Collection of Materials Objective interpretation Low burden for people providing data Relatively inexpensive May not correspond to exactly what researcher wants May be incomplete or require additional interpretation Source:U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement