United Pacific, Inc. and Skippers Maritime Services, Inc. Ltd. vs. Nathaniel Doza, Et Al.
United Pacific, Inc. and Skippers Maritime Services, Inc. Ltd. vs. Nathaniel Doza, Et Al.
United Pacific, Inc. and Skippers Maritime Services, Inc. Ltd. vs. Nathaniel Doza, Et Al.
Article 285 of the Labor Code recognizes termination b the em!loee of the em!loment
contract b "serving #ritten notice on the em!loer at least one $%& month in advance.' (iven
that !rovision) the la# contem!lates the requirement of a #ritten notice of resignation. *n the
absence of a #ritten resignation) it is safe to !resume that the em!loer terminated the seafarers.
*n this case) the +u!reme Court found the dismissal of De (racia) et al. to be illegal since
Cosmoshi! merel sent a telex to +,i!!ers) the local manning agenc) claiming that De (racia)
et al. #ere re!atriated because the latter voluntaril !re-terminated their contracts. Skippers
United Pacific, Inc. and Skippers Maritime Services, Inc. Ltd. vs. Nathaniel Doza, et al., G.R.
No. !"""#. $e%r&ar' #, ()(.