The document provides two examples for financial accounting review questions. The first asks to analyze a comparative income statement for 2008 and 2007 and comment on changes between the years. The second provides trend data for a toy company from 2000 to 2008 and asks to perform a horizontal analysis and comment on results.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views2 pages
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING: Review Questions
The document provides two examples for financial accounting review questions. The first asks to analyze a comparative income statement for 2008 and 2007 and comment on changes between the years. The second provides trend data for a toy company from 2000 to 2008 and asks to perform a horizontal analysis and comment on results.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING: Review Questions
1. Comparative income statements for 2008 and 2007 follow.
2008 2007 Sales $9,434,000 $7,862,000 Cost of Sales 7,075,400 5,660,640 Gross Profit $2,358,600 $2,201,360 Operating Expenses 1,367,690 1,365,060 Operating ncome $ 990,910 $ 836,300 nterest Expense 157,500 126,000 Earnings !efore "ax $ 833,410 $ 710,300 ncome "axes 400,000 317,200 #et ncome $ 433,410 $ 393,100 $e%&ired' a. Prepare a vertical common(si)e anal*sis of t+is statement for eac+ *ear, &sing sales as t+e -ase. -. Comment -riefl* on t+e c+anges -etween t+e two *ears, -ased on t+e vertical common(si)e statement. 2."oledo "o*, a man&fact&rer of infants. -loc/s, presented t+e following data in its last ann&al report. "+is trend anal*sis -egins wit+ t+e *ear of formation, 2000. 2008 2007 2001 2000 Sales $61,000 $41,000 $25,000 $13,000 Cost of Sales $41,300 $28,175 $17,201 $9,000 #et ncome $9,919 $6,412 $3,850 $2,000 Cases of !loc/s S+ipped 33,126 22,681 13,900 7,400 $e%&ired' a. 2sing 2000 as t+e -ase *ear, perform a +ori)ontal, common(si)e anal*sis. -. Comment on t+e res<s of t+e +ori)ontal anal*sis. 3<iple C+oice 4&estions 1.5enver 5*namics +as net income of 62,000,000. Oa/land Enterprises +as net income of 62,000,000. 7+ic+ of t+e following -est compares t+e profita-ilit* of 5enver and Oa/land8 a. Oa/land Enterprises is 209 more profita-le t+an 5enver 5*namics. -. Oa/land Enterprises is more profita-le t+an 5enver 5*namics, -&t t+e comparison can:t -e %&antified. c. Oa/land Enterprises is onl* more profita-le if it is smaller t+an 5enver 5*namics. d. ;&rt+er information is needed for a reasona-le comparison. e. Oa/land Enterprises is more profita-le if it is a larger firm t+an 5enver 5*namics. 2. .n financial statement anal*sis, ratios are' a. t+e onl* t*pe of anal*sis w+ere ind&str* data are availa-le -. a-sol&te n&m-ers converted to a common -ase c. fractions &s&all* expressed in percent or times d. t+e onl* indication of t+e financial position of t+e firm e. none of t+e answers are correct