Problem Solutions For Chapter 3
Problem Solutions For Chapter 3
3-1.
P(0) 10
α (dB/ km ) =
10
z
log =
P(z) z
α z
log e p ( )
3-2. Since the attenuations are given in dB/km, first find the power levels in dBm for
100 µW and 150 µW. These are, respectively,
P(100 µW) = 10 log (100 µW/1.0 mW) = 10 log (0.10) = - 10.0 dBm
P(150 µW) = 10 log (150 µW/1.0 mW) = 10 log (0.15) = - 8.24 dBm
P1550(8 km) = - 10.0 dBm – (0.3 dB/km)(8 km) = - 12.4 dBm = 57.5 µW
P1300(20 km) = - 8.2 dBm – (0.6 dB/km)(20 km) = - 20.2 dBm = 9.55 µW
P1550(20 km) = - 10.0 dBm – (0.3 dB/km)(20 km) = - 16.0 dBm = 25.1 µW
3-5. With λ in Eqs. (3-2b) and (3-3) given in µm, we have the following representative
points for αuv and αIR:
1
λ (µ
µ m) αuv αIR
0.5 20.3 --
0.7 1.44 --
0.9 0.33 --
1.2 0.09 2.2×10-6
1.5 0.04 0.0072
2.0 0.02 23.2
3.0 0.009 7.5×104
8π 3 2 2
αscat = 4 (n − 1) kBTfβT
3λ
8π 3
4[
(1.46)2 − 1] (1.38×10-16 dyne-cm/K)(1400 K)
2
=
3(0.63 µm)
×(6.8×10-12 cm2/dyne)
= 0.883 km-1
8π 3 8 2
αscat = 4 n p kBTfβT = 1.16 km = 5.0 dB/km
-1
3λ
3-10. From Fig. 2-22, we make the estimates given in this table:
νm Pclad/P αν m = α1 + (α
α2 - α1 )Pclad/P 5 + 103Pclad/P
01 0.02 3.0 + 0.02 5 + 20 = 25
11 0.05 3.0 + 0.05 5 + 50 = 55
21 0.10 3.0 + 0.10 5 + 100 = 105
02 0.16 3.0 + 0.16 5 + 160 = 165
31 0.19 3.0 + 0.19 5 + 190 = 195
12 0.31 3.0 + 0.31 5 + 310 = 315
2
3-11. (a) We want to solve Eq. (3-12) for αgi. With α = 2 in Eq. (2-78) and letting
n 2 (0) − n 22
∆= 2
2n (0)
we have
n 2 (0) − n 2(r) r2
α(r) = α1 + (α2 - α1) 2 2 = α1 + (α2 - α1 ) 2
n (0) − n 2 a
Thus
∞ ∞
∞ ∞
1
∫ exp (−Kr 2 ) r 3dr ∫ e − x x dx 1
1!
2K2 1
0
∞ = 0
∞ = K =
1 0! K
∫ exp(−Kr ) r dr
2
∫ e −x dx
0
2K 0
(α2 − α1 )
Thus αgi = α1 + 2
Ka
− Ka 2 Ka 2
(b) p(a) = 0.1 P0 = P0 e yields e = 10.
(α2 − α1 )
αgi = α1 + = 0.57α1 + 0.43α2
2.3
3
1/ 2
196.98
n = 1 + 2
(13.4) − (1.24 / λ)
2
To compare this with Fig. 3-12, calculate three representative points, for example,
λ = 0.2, 0.6, and 1.0 µm. Thus we have the following:
dτ
3-13. (a) From Fig. 3-13, ≈ 80 ps/(nm-km) at 850 nm. Therefore, for the LED we
dλ
have from Eq. (3-20)
σ mat dτ
= σλ = [80 ps/(nm-km)](45 nm) = 3.6 ns/km
L dλ
σ mat
= [80 ps/(nm-km)](2 nm) = 0.16 ns/km
L
dτ mat
(b) From Fig. 3-13, = 22 ps/(nm-km)
dλ
3-14. (a) Using Eqs. (2-48), (2-49), and (2-57), Eq. (3-21) becomes
2
ua u 2a2 w2
b = 1 - = 1 - 2 2 =
V u a + w2 a 2 u 2 + w 2
β 2 − k 2 n 22 β 2 / k 2 − n 22
= 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 2 2
k n1 − β + β − k n2 n1 − n 2
(β / k + n 2 )(β / k − n 2 )
(b) Expand b as b=
(n1 + n 2 )(n1 − n 2 )
Since n2< β/k < n1 , let β/k = n1(1 - δ) where 0 < δ < ∆ << 1. Thus,
4
β / k + n 2 n 1 (1 − δ) + n 2 n1
= =1- δ
n1 + n 2 n 1 + n2 n 1 + n2
β / k + n2 δ δ
=1- ≈ 1 since << 1
n1 + n 2 2 −∆ 2 −∆
β / k − n2
Therefore, b ≈ or β = k[bn1∆ + n2]
n1 − n 2
3-16. The time delay between the highest and lowest order modes can be found from the
travel time difference between the two rays shown here.
θ ϕ a
s
x n n (1 − ∆ )
sin φ = = 2 = 1 = (1 - ∆)
s n1 n1
n 1 L n 1L 1
T max = s =
c x c 1−∆
Ln 1
For the axial ray the travel time is T min =
c
5
Therefore
Ln 1 1 Ln 1 ∆ Ln 1 ∆
T min - T max = − 1 = ≈
c 1 − ∆ c 1−∆ c
σ mod n1 ∆ π
= 1−
L c V
where the first tern is Equation (3-30). The difference is then given by the factor
π πλ 1 πλ 1
1− =1− ≈ 1 −
2a (n12 − n 22 )
1/ 2
V 2a n 1 2∆
π(1.3) 1
At 1300 nm this factor is 1 − = 1 − 0.127 = 0.873
2(62.5) 1.48 2(0.015)
3 α α+2 1 α +1 1
C1 = 1, C2 = , = 1, = , = ,
2 α+1 3α + 2 3 2α + 1 2
(α + 1)2 1
and =
(5α + 2)(3α + 2) 15
Ln1 ∆ 12 2 1/ 2 Ln1 ∆
σ int er mod al = 1+ 3∆ + ∆ ≈
2 3c 5 2 3c
6
3-19. For ε = 0 we have that α = 2(1 - ∆). Thus C1 and C2 in Eq. (3-42) become
5
(ignoring small terms such as ∆3, ∆4, ...)
6
− ∆ −
3
α − 2 2 1 5 2 − ∆
3 3
C1 = = = 5 ≈ − ∆ 1 + ∆
α + 2 2 1 − 6 ∆ + 2 1 − 3 ∆ 5 5
5 5
6
6
32 1 − ∆ − 2 9
1− ∆
3α − 2 5 5
C2 = = =
2(α + 2) 3
2 2 1− ∆ + 2 2 1 − ∆
6
5 5
9 2
(a) C12 ≈ ∆
25
3 9 6
4∆ − ∆ 1 − ∆ 2 1− ∆ + 1
4C1 C2 (α + 1)∆ 5 5 5
(b) =
2α + 1 1 − 3 ∆ 2 1− 3 ∆ 4 1 − 6 ∆ + 1
5 5 5
18∆ 11 18
−
1− ∆ +
25 18 2
= 2 ∆
24 25
51 ∆ ∆
5 25
2
9 4 2
16∆ 1− ∆ 9 1 − ∆
2
5 5 9 2
= 2 ≈ ∆
9 3 24
96(1 − ∆)(1 − ∆)4 1− ∆
10 5
Therefore,
Ln 1 ∆ α α + 2 9 2 18 2 9 2
1/ 2 1/ 2
σ int er mod al = ∆ − ∆ + ∆
2c α + 1 3α + 2 25 25 24
1/ 2
6 6
2(1 − ∆) 2(1− ∆) + 2
Ln 1 ∆2 5 5 3 n1∆2 L
= ≈
2c 2(1 − 6 ∆) + 1 6(1− 6 ∆) + 2 10 6 20 3c
5 5
7
3-20. We want to plot Eq. (3-30) as a function of σ λ , where σ int er mod al and
σ int ra mod al are given by Eqs. (3-41) and (3-45). For ε = 0 and α = 2, we have C1 =
0 and C2 = 1/2. Since σ int er mod al does not vary with σ λ , we have
1 σ λ 2 d 2 n1 0.098σ λ ns / km at 850 nm
σ int ra mod al = −λ = −2
c λ dλ2 1.026 × 10 σ λ ns / km at 1300 nm
3-21. Using the same parameter values as in Prob. 3-18, except with ∆ = 0.001, we have
from Eq. (3-41) σ int er mod al /L = 7 ps/km, and from Eq. (3.45)
σ 1 2
= (σ int er + σ 2int ra ) vs σ λ :
1/ 2
The plot of
L L
L dβ L 1 dn
τg = = 2kn1 + 2k n1 1
2 2
c dk c 2β dk
α
α + 2 m α+ 2 2
2
(n1 k ∆ )
2 2 −1
α+2
- 2
α a
2
α+2
2 dn 2 n 2 k 2 d∆
× ∆ 2k n1 1 + 2kn1 + 1
dk ∆ dk
α
L kn1
4∆ α + 2 m 1 α +2
n1 k d∆
= N1 − N1 +
α + 2 α a n1 k ∆ 2∆ dk
2 2 2
c β
8
α
LN1 kn1 4∆ m α +2 ε
1− 1 +
c β α + 2 M 4
=
dn 1
with N1 = n1 + k and where M is given by Eq. (2-97) and ε is defined in Eq.
dk
(3-36b).
α
dτ L dN 1 α − ε − 2 m α+ 2
λ 1+
c dλ
=
dλ α + 2 M
α
LN1 α − ε − 2 d m α +2
∆
α + 2 dλ M
+
c
where
dn1 α 2 2 2
N1 = n1 - λ and M = a k n1 ∆
dλ α+2
dN 1 d dn d 2 n1
(a) = n1 − λ 1 = - λ
dλ dλ
2
dλ dλ
d 2 n1
Thus ignoring the term involving ∆ 2 , the first term in square brackets
dλ
L 2 d 2 n1
becomes - λ 2
c dλ
α α α
d m α+ 2
α
−α dM 1 α +2
+1
α+ 2 d∆ 1
α +2
∆ m + ∆
dλ M dλ M
(b) =
α + 2 dλ M
dM α 2 d 2 2
(c) =
dλ α + 2
a
dλ
(k n1 ∆ )
α d∆ 2 2 dn dk
k n1 + 2k ∆n1 1 + 2kn1 ∆
2 2
= a2
α+2 dλ dλ dλ
9
d∆ dn
Ignoring and 1 terms yields
dλ dλ
dM 2α 2 2 2 1 2M
= a k n1 ∆ − = - so that
dλ α + 2 λ λ
α α
d m α+ 2 ∆ 2α m α +2
∆
dλ M
= . Therefore
λ α + 2 M
α
dτ L d 2 n1 LN1 α − ε − 2 2α∆ m α +2
λ = - λ2 +
dλ c dλ2 c α + 2 α + 2 M
d 2 n1 2α α
3-24. Let a = λ2 2 ; b = N1C1∆ ; γ=
dλ α+2 α+2
2 2
σ 1 M
dτ g
σ 2
= L λ
2
∑ λ
int ra mod al
λ M m= 0
dλ
2 γ 2
2
L σλ 1
M
m
=
c λ M ∑
m= 0
−a + M
b
2 γ 2
L σλ 1 M m
2
c λ M ∫0 −a + M
≈ b dm
2 γ
2
L σλ 1 M 2 m 2 m
2γ
=
c λ M ∫0
a − 2ab
M + b
M
dm
L σλ
2 2
2 2ab b2
= a − +
c λ γ + 1 2γ + 1
L σ
2 2
2 d 2 n 2
= λ
−λ dλ2
1
c λ
10
2 d 2 n1 α 2 4α 2
- 2 λ N1C1∆ (N C
+ 1 1 ∆)
dλ 2
α+1 (α + 2)(3α + 2)
1500(0.09) 1310 4
(b) D =
1500 =
1− 14.1 ps /(nm − km)
4
σ step n1 ∆ 1.49(0.01)
= = 8 = 14.4 ns / km
L 2 3 c 2 3 (3 × 10 )
σ opt n ∆2 1.49(0.01)2
= 1 = = 14.3 ps / km
L 20 3 c 20 3 (3 × 108 )
n1 ∆L (1.49)(0.01)(5 × 103 m)
σ mod = Tmax − Tmin = = 8 = 248 ns
c 3 × 10 m / s
n 1∆L 248
σ step = = = 71.7 ns
2 3c 2 3
0.2
(c) BT = = 2.8 Mb / s
σ step
11
3-29. For α = 0.95αopt , we have
12