0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views

Problem Solutions For Chapter 2 E e e e

The document provides solutions to problems from Chapter 2. Problem 2-15 discusses transverse electromagnetic modes in a cylindrical waveguide. It derives expressions for the longitudinal electric and magnetic field components Ez and Hz for the TM0m mode, where m=0. It shows that for this mode, Hz must be equal to 0 based on the boundary conditions. Problem 2-14 derives the wave equations for the transverse electric and magnetic fields in a cylindrical coordinate system by substituting the field components into Maxwell's equations. It obtains the scalar Helmholtz equations for Ez, Eφ, Hz and Hφ that govern electromagnetic wave propagation in cylindrical waveguides. The document provides detailed solutions to electromagnetic problems

Uploaded by

api-19870706
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views

Problem Solutions For Chapter 2 E e e e

The document provides solutions to problems from Chapter 2. Problem 2-15 discusses transverse electromagnetic modes in a cylindrical waveguide. It derives expressions for the longitudinal electric and magnetic field components Ez and Hz for the TM0m mode, where m=0. It shows that for this mode, Hz must be equal to 0 based on the boundary conditions. Problem 2-14 derives the wave equations for the transverse electric and magnetic fields in a cylindrical coordinate system by substituting the field components into Maxwell's equations. It obtains the scalar Helmholtz equations for Ez, Eφ, Hz and Hφ that govern electromagnetic wave propagation in cylindrical waveguides. The document provides detailed solutions to electromagnetic problems

Uploaded by

api-19870706
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Problem Solutions for Chapter 2

E = 100cos (2 π108 t + 30°) e x + 20 cos (2π10 8t − 50°) e y


2-1.
+ 40cos (2π10 8 t + 210°) e z

2-2. The general form is:

y = (amplitude) cos(ωt - kz) = A cos [2π(νt - z/λ)]. Therefore

(a) amplitude = 8 µm

(b) wavelength: 1/λ = 0.8 µm-1 so that λ = 1.25 µm

(c) ω = 2πν = 2π(2) = 4π

(d) At t = 0 and z = 4 µm we have

y = 8 cos [2π(-0.8 µm-1)(4 µm)]

= 8 cos [2π(-3.2)] = 2.472


1.240
2-3. For E in electron volts and λ in µm we have E =
λ
(a) At 0.82 µm, E = 1.240/0.82 = 1.512 eV

At 1.32 µm, E = 1.240/1.32 = 0.939 eV

At 1.55 µm, E = 1.240/1.55 = 0.800 eV

(b) At 0.82 µm, k = 2π/λ = 7.662 µm-1

At 1.32 µm, k = 2π/λ = 4.760 µm-1

At 1.55 µm, k = 2π/λ = 4.054 µm-1

2-4. x1 = a1 cos (ωt - δ1) and x2 = a2 cos (ωt - δ2)

Adding x1 and x2 yields

x1 + x2 = a1 [cos ωt cos δ1 + sin ωt sin δ1]

+ a2 [cos ωt cos δ2 + sin ωt sin δ2]

= [a1 cos δ1 + a2 cos δ2] cos ωt + [a1 sin δ1 + a2 sin δ2] sin ωt

Since the a's and the δ's are constants, we can set
a1 cos δ1 + a2 cos δ2 = A cos φ (1)

1
a1 sin δ1 + a2 sin δ2 = A sin φ (2)

provided that constant values of A and φ exist which satisfy these equations. To

verify this, first square both sides and add:

A2 (sin2 φ + cos2 φ) = a 1 (sin δ1 + cos δ1 )


2 2 2

+ a 22 (sin 2 δ 2 + cos2 δ 2 ) + 2a1a2 (sin δ1 sin δ2 + cos δ1 cos δ2)

or
A2 = a 12 + a 22 + 2a1a2 cos (δ1 - δ2)

Dividing (2) by (1) gives

a 1 sin δ1 + a 2 sin δ2
tan φ =
a 1 cosδ1 + a 2 cosδ2

Thus we can write


x = x1 + x2 = A cos φ cos ωt + A sin φ sin ωt = A cos(ωt - φ)

2-5. First expand Eq. (2-3) as

Ey
= cos (ωt - kz) cos δ - sin (ωt - kz) sin δ (2.5-1)
E0 y

Subtract from this the expression

Ex
cos δ = cos (ωt - kz) cos δ
E0 x

to yield

Ey E x
- cos δ = - sin (ωt - kz) sin δ (2.5-2)
E 0 y E 0x

Using the relation cos2 α + sin2 α = 1, we use Eq. (2-2) to write

2
  E 2
sin2 (ωt - kz) = [1 - cos2 (ωt - kz)] = 1 −  x   (2.5-3)
  E 0x  

Squaring both sides of Eq. (2.5-2) and substituting it into Eq. (2.5-3) yields

   Ex  
2 2
 Ey Ex
1  
 E − E cos δ  =  −  E 0x   sin δ
2
0y 0x  

Expanding the left-hand side and rearranging terms yields

2
 Ex   Ey   E  E 
2
  +  - 2  x   y  cos δ = sin2 δ
 E 0x   E 0y   E 0x   E 0y 

2-6. Plot of Eq. (2-7).

2-7. Linearly polarized wave.

2-8.
Air: n = 1.0

33 ° 33 °

Glass 90 °

(a) Apply Snell's law


n1 cos θ1 = n2 cos θ2

where n1 = 1, θ1 = 33°, and θ2 = 90° - 33° = 57°

cos 33°
∴ n2 = = 1.540
cos 57°
(b) The critical angle is found from
nglass sin φglass = nair sin φair

3
with φair = 90° and nair = 1.0

1 1
∴ φcritical = arcsin = arcsin = 40.5°
n glass 1.540

2-9
Air r

Water
θ
12 cm

Find θc from Snell's law n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θc = 1

When n2 = 1.33, then θc = 48.75°


r
Find r from tan θc = , which yields r = 13.7 cm.
12 cm

2-10.

45 °

Using Snell's law nglass sin θc = nalcohol sin 90°

where θc = 45° we have


1.45
nglass = = 2.05
sin 45°

2-11. (a) Use either NA = (n12 − n22 ) = 0.242


1/ 2

or

4
2(n1 − n 2 )
NA ≈ n1 2∆ = n1 = 0.243
n1

 0.242 
(b) θ0,max = arcsin (NA/n) = arcsin  = 14°
1.0 

2-13. NA = (n12 − n22 ) = [n12 − n12 (1− ∆)2 ]


1/ 2 1/ 2

= n1 (2∆ − ∆2 )
1 /2

Since ∆ << 1, ∆2 << ∆; ∴ NA ≈ n1 2∆

2-14. (a) Solve Eq. (2-34a) for jHφ:

εω 1 ∂H z
jHφ = j Er - Substituting into Eq. (2-33b) we have
β βr ∂φ

∂E z  εω 1 ∂H z 
j β Er + = ωµ j E −
∂r  β r βr ∂φ 

Solve for Er and let q2 = ω2εµ - β2 to obtain Eq. (2-35a).

(b) Solve Eq. (2-34b) for jHr:

εω 1 ∂H z
jHr = -j Eφ - Substituting into Eq. (2-33a) we have
β β ∂r

1 ∂E z  εω 1 ∂Hz 
j β Eφ + = -ωµ − j E −
r ∂φ  β φ
β ∂r 

Solve for Eφ and let q2 = ω2εµ - β2 to obtain Eq. (2-35b).

(c) Solve Eq. (2-34a) for jEr:

5
1 1  ∂Hz 
jEr = + jrβH φ Substituting into Eq. (2-33b) we have
εω r  ∂φ 

β 1  ∂Hz  ∂E z
+ jrβH φ + = jωµ Hφ
εω r  ∂φ  ∂r

Solve for Hφ and let q2 = ω2εµ - β2 to obtain Eq. (2-35d).

(d) Solve Eq. (2-34b) for jEφ

1  ∂H z 
jEφ = - jβ H r + Substituting into Eq. (2-33a) we have
εω  ∂r 

1 ∂E z β  ∂H z 
- jβ H r + = -jωµ Hr
r ∂φ εω  ∂r 
Solve for Hr to obtain Eq. (2-35c).

(e) Substitute Eqs. (2-35c) and (2-35d) into Eq. (2-34c)

j 1  ∂  ∂Hz ∂E z  ∂  ∂H z εω ∂E z  
- β + εωr − β − = jεωEz
q r  ∂r  ∂φ
2
∂r  ∂φ  ∂r r ∂φ  

Upon differentiating and multiplying by jq2/εω we obtain Eq. (2-36).

(f) Substitute Eqs. (2-35a) and (2-35b) into Eq. (2-33c)

j 1  ∂  ∂E z ∂H z  ∂  ∂E z µω ∂Hz  
- β − µω r − β + = -jµωHz
r  ∂r  ∂φ ∂r  ∂φ  ∂r r ∂φ  
2
q

Upon differentiating and multiplying by jq2/εω we obtain Eq. (2-37).

2-15. For ν = 0, from Eqs. (2-42) and (2-43) we have

6
Ez = AJ0(ur) e j(ωt − βz ) and Hz = BJ0(ur) e j(ωt − βz )

We want to find the coefficients A and B. From Eqs. (2-47) and (2-51),

respectively, we have

J ν (ua) J ν (ua)
C= A and D= B
K ν (wa) K ν (wa)

Substitute these into Eq. (2-50) to find B in terms of A:

 jβν   1 1   J' ν (ua) K' ν (wa) 


+
 uJ ν (ua) + wK (wa) 
A = Bωµ
 a   u2 w 2  ν

For ν = 0, the right-hand side must be zero. Also for ν = 0, either Eq. (2-55a) or (2-56a)

holds. Suppose Eq. (2-56a) holds, so that the term in square brackets on the right-hand

side in the above equation is not zero. Then we must have that B = 0, which from Eq. (2-
43) means that Hz = 0. Thus Eq. (2-56) corresponds to TM0m modes.

For the other case, substitute Eqs. (2-47) and (2-51) into Eq. (2-52):

1  jβν 
0= B J ν (ua) + Aωε 1uJ' ν (ua)
u  a
2

1  jβν K' (wa)J ν (ua) 


+ B J ν (ua) + Aωε 2 w ν
w
2
 a K ν (wa) 

With k21 = ω2µε1 and k22 = ω2µε2 rewrite this as

 
ja  1  [k 2 J + k 2 K ] A
Bν = 1 1 1 ν ν
βωµ  + 
2

u 2
w 
2

7
where Jν and Kν are defined in Eq. (2-54). If for ν = 0 the term in square brackets on the

right-hand side is non-zero, that is, if Eq. (2-56a) does not hold, then we must have that A
= 0, which from Eq. (2-42) means that Ez = 0. Thus Eq. (2-55) corresponds to TE0m

modes.

2-16. From Eq. (2-23) we have

n 21 − n22 1  n 22 
∆ = 2 = 1− 2
2n1 2 n1 

∆ << 1 implies n1 ≈ n2

Thus using Eq. (2-46), which states that n2k = k2 ≤ β ≤ k1 = n1k, we have

n 22 k 2 = k 22 ≈ n 21 k 2 = k12 ≈ β 2

2-17.

2-18. (a) From Eqs. (2-59) and (2-61) we have

2π 2 a 2 2 2π 2 a 2
M≈
λ 2 (n 1 − n2
2 ) =
λ 2 (NA )2

1/ 2 1/ 2
 M λ  1000  0.85µm
a= = = 30.25µm
 2π  NA 2  0.2π

Therefore, D = 2a =60.5 µm

2π (30.25µm )
2 2

(b) M = (0.2)2 = 414


(1.32µm )
2

(c) At 1550 nm, M = 300

2-19. From Eq. (2-58),

8
2π (25 µm)
[(1.48)2 − (1.46)2 ] = 46.5
1/ 2
V=
0.82 µm

Using Eq. (2-61) M ≈ V2/2 =1081 at 820 nm.

Similarly, M = 417 at 1320 nm and M = 303 at 1550 nm. From Eq. (2-72)

 Pclad  4 -1/2 4 × 100%


 P  total ≈ 3 M = = 4.1%
3 1080

at 820 nm. Similarly, (Pclad/P)total = 6.6% at 1320 nm and 7.8% at 1550 nm.

2-20 (a) At 1320 nm we have from Eqs. (2-23) and (2-57) that V = 25 and M = 312.

(b) From Eq. (2-72) the power flow in the cladding is 7.5%.

2-21. (a) For single-mode operation, we need V ≤ 2.40.

Solving Eq. (2-58) for the core radius a

Vλ 2 2.40(1.32µm)
(n1 − n22 ) =
−1/ 2
a= = 6.55 µm
2 π[(1.480) − (1.478) ]
2 1/ 2
2π 2

(b) From Eq. (2-23)

NA = (n1 − n2 ) = [(1.480) − (1.478) ]


2 2 1/ 2 2 2 1/ 2
= 0.077

(c) From Eq. (2-23), NA = n sin θ0,max. When n = 1.0 then

 NA   0.077 
θ0,max = arcsin  = arcsin  1.0  = 4.4°
n 

2 2 2 2
2-22. n2 = n1 − NA = (1.458) − (0.3) = 1.427

λV (1.30)(75)
a= = = 52 µm
2 πNA 2 π (0.3)

9
2 πa
2-23. For small values of ∆ we can write V ≈ n1 2∆
λ
For a = 5 µm we have ∆ ≈ 0.002, so that at 0.82 µm

2 π (5 µm)
V≈ 1.45 2(0.002) = 3.514
0.82 µm

Thus the fiber is no longer single-mode. From Figs. 2-18 and 2-19 we see that the LP01

and the LP11 modes exist in the fiber at 0.82 µm.

2-24.

2π λ
2-25. From Eq. (2-77) Lp = =
β n y − nx

1.3 × 10 −6 m
For Lp = 10 cm ny - nx = = 1.3×10-5
10 −1 m

1.3 × 10 −6 m
For Lp = 2 m ny - nx = = 6.5×10-7
2m
Thus
6.5×10-7 ≤ ny - nx ≤ 1.3×10-5
2-26. We want to plot n(r) from n2 to n1. From Eq. (2-78)

n(r) = n1 [1− 2∆(r / a)α ] = 1.48 [1− 0.02(r / 25)α ]


1 /2 1 /2

n2 is found from Eq. (2-79): n2 = n1(1 - ∆) = 1.465

2-27. From Eq. (2-81)

α α  2πan1  2
M= a k n1 ∆ =
2 2 2

α+2 α +2  λ 

where
n1 − n2
∆= = 0.0135
n1

10
At λ = 820 nm, M = 543 and at λ = 1300 nm, M = 216.

For a step index fiber we can use Eq. (2-61)

V2 1  2πa  2 2
Mstep ≈
2
= 
2 λ  (n1 − n 22 )

At λ = 820 nm, Mstep = 1078 and at λ = 1300 nm, Mstep = 429.

Alternatively, we can let α = ∞ in Eq. (2-81):

 2πan1 
2
1086 at 820 nm
Mstep =  ∆= 
λ  432 at 1300 nm

2-28. Using Eq. (2-23) we have

(a) NA = (n12 − n22 ) = [(1.60)2 − (1.49)2 ] = 0.58


1/ 2 1/ 2

(b) NA = [(1.458)2 − (1.405)2 ] = 0.39


1/ 2

2-29. (a) From the Principle of the Conservation of Mass, the volume of a preform rod

section of length Lpreform and cross-sectional area A must equal the volume of the fiber

drawn from this section. The preform section of length Lpreform is drawn into a fiber of

length Lfiber in a time t. If S is the preform feed speed, then Lpreform = St. Similarly, if s is the

fiber drawing speed, then Lfiber = st. Thus, if D and d are the preform and fiber diameters,

respectively, then

Preform volume = Lpreform(D/2)2 = St (D/2)2

and Fiber volume = Lfiber (d/2)2 = st (d/2)2

Equating these yields


2 2 2
D d D
St   = st   or s = S  
2 2 d
2 2
d  0.125 mm 
(b) S = s   = 1.2 m/s  = 1.39 cm/min
D 9 mm 

11
2-30. Consider the following geometries of the preform and its corresponding fiber:

25 µm
R
4 mm
62.5 µm

3 mm
FIBER
PREFORM

We want to find the thickness of the deposited layer (3 mm - R). This can be done by

comparing the ratios of the preform core-to-cladding cross-sectional areas and the fiber

core-to-cladding cross-sectional areas:

A preform core A fiber core


=
Apreform clad A fiber clad

or
π(32 − R2 ) π (25)2
=
π(42 − 32 ) π [(62.5)2 − (25)2 ]

from which we have


1/ 2
 7(25)2 
R = 9 − 2 = 2.77 mm
 (62.5) − (25) 
2

Thus, thickness = 3 mm - 2.77 mm = 0.23 mm.

2-31. (a) The volume of a 1-km-long 50-µm diameter fiber core is

V = πr2L = π (2.5×10-3 cm)2 (105 cm) = 1.96 cm3

The mass M equals the density ρ times the volume V:

M = ρV = (2.6 gm/cm3)(1.96 cm3) = 5.1 gm

12
(b) If R is the deposition rate, then the deposition time t is

M 5.1 gm
t= = = 10.2 min
R 0.5 gm / min

2-32. Solving Eq. (2-82) for χ yields


2
 K
χ=  where Y = π for surface flaws.
Yσ 
Thus
(20 N / mm 3 / 2 ) 2
χ= = 2.60×10-4 mm = 0.26 µm
(70 MN / m 2 )2 π

2-33. (a) To find the time to failure, we substitute Eq. (2-82) into Eq. (2-86) and

integrate (assuming that σ is independent of time):


χf t

∫ χ − b / 2 dχ = AYbσb ∫ dt
χi 0

which yields

1
b [χ f − χ1− ] = AYbσbt
1− b / 2 b/ 2
i
1−
2
or
2
b [χ i − χ (f 2− b) / 2 ]
(2− b) / 2
t=
(b − 2)A(Yσ)

(b) Rewriting the above expression in terms of K instead of χ yields

2  Ki  2− b  K f  2 −b 
t= −
(b − 2)A(Yσ )  Yσ  Yσ  
b

2− b
2Ki
≈ if K b− 2
<< K b− 2
or K i2 −b >> Kf 2− b
(b − 2)A(Yσ )
b i f

2-34. Substituting Eq. (2-82) into Eq. (2-86) gives


= AKb = AYbχb/2σb
dt

13
Integrating this from χ i to χ p where

2
 K 
2
 K 
χi =   and χp =  
 Yσ i   Yσ p 

are the initial crack depth and the crack depth after proof testing, respectively, yields
χp tp

∫χ dχ = AYb ∫ σ dt
−b / 2 b

χi 0

or

1
b χp[ 1− b / 2
− χi
1−b / 2
]= AYb σ b
p tp
1−
2

for a constant stress σp. Substituting for χ i and χ p gives

2−b
 2   K
 b − 2   Y σ b−
i
2
[
− σ b−
p
2
= AYb σ bp tp ]
or
2−b
 2   K 1
 b − 2   Y AY
[
b− 2
b σi
b− 2
− σ p = B σ b−2
i − σ b−2
p ] [b
= σ p tp ]
which is Eq. (2-87).

When a static stress σs is applied after proof testing, the time to failure is found from Eq.
(2-86):
χs ts

∫ χ −b / 2 dχ = AYb σ bs ∫ dt
χp 0

where χ s is the crack depth at the fiber failure point. Integrating (as above) we get Eq. (2-
89):

[
B σ b−2
p − σsb−2 = σ bs ts ]
Adding Eqs. (2-87) and (2-89) yields Eq. (2-90).

14
2-35. (a) Substituting Ns as given by Eq. (2-92) and Np as given by Eq. (2-93) into Eq.

(2-94) yields

  b m m 

F = 1 - exp  −
L

[
 (σ p t p + σsb t s )/ B + σsb−2 ]
b−2


(σ t
b
p p / B + σ b−2
p )b− 2 


 L0 σ m0 σ0m

  

  m
 
  σ bp t p + σ bs t s   b− 2
    + σsb −2
 
m   
− L  B 
= 1 - exp  L 0 σ 0
[
m σp p
b
t / B + σ b−
p
2
]b −2

σ bp t p / B + σ b− 2  −1

 
  
p

  
   

  m

 σ b t  σ  b B  b −2
  1+ s s + s 
 σb 
  t
p p σ σ
 p s p2
t 
= 1 - exp  − LN p  − 1
B
 1+ 2 
 σpt p
  
  

  m

  b−2
   
 σ bs t s  1 

≈ 1 - exp − LN p  1 + b  − 1
 σ p t p  1 + B 
  
  σ 2p t p  
 

(b) For the term given by Eq. (2-96) we have

b
σ  B 0.5 (MN / m 2 )2 s
 s  2 = (0.3)15 = 6.5×10-14
[0.3 (350 MN / m )] 10 s
2
 σ p  σs t p 2

Thus this term can be neglected.

15
2-36. The failure probability is given by Eq. (2-85). For equal failure probabilities of the
two fiber samples, F1 = F2, or

  σ m L   σ m L 
1 - exp −  1c
 1
 = 1 - exp −  2c  2

  σ0  L0    σ0  L0 

which implies that

m m
 σ1c  L1  σ 2c  L 2
  = 
 σ 0  L 0  σ0  L0

or
1/m
σ1c  L 2 
=
σ 2c  L1 

If L1 = 20 m, then σ1c= 4.8 GN/m2

If L2 = 1 km, then σ2c= 3.9 GN/m2

Thus
m
 4.8  1000
= = 50
 3.9  20

gives
log 50
m= = 18.8
log(4.8/ 3.9)

16

You might also like