Summer Reviewer: A C B O 2007 Civil Law
Summer Reviewer: A C B O 2007 Civil Law
Summer Reviewer: A C B O 2007 Civil Law
Civil Law
SUMMER REVIEWER
bailee because they are not necessary for the Reason for the presumption: to safeguard
preservation of the thing effectively the right of the bailor. The law
3. To take good care of the thing with the presumes that the bailor takes into account the
diligence of a good father of a family (Art. personal integrity and responsibility of all the
1163) bailees and that, therefore, he would not have
4. To be liable for loss even if due to a fortuitous constituted the commodatum if there were only
event: one bailee
GR: the bailee is not liable for loss or damage
due to a fortuitous event (Art. 1174)
Reason: the bailor retains the ownership of the OBLIGATIONS OF THE BAILOR (AD-READ-HA)
thing loaned 1. Primary obligation of the bailor:
Exceptions: (Art. 1942 – punishes the bailee GR: To allow the bailee the use of the thing loaned
for his improper acts although they for the duration of the period stipulated or until the
may not be the proximate cause of accomplishment of the purpose for w/c the
the loss) commodatum was constituted
a. Bad faith – if the bailee devotes the thing to Exceptions: the bailor may demand the return or
any purpose different from that for which it its temporary use upon:
has been loaned a. bailor has an urgent need for the thing (Art.
b. Delay - he keeps it longer than the period 1946) – the contract is suspended
stipulated or after the accomplishment of the • Reason: the right of the bailor is based on
use for which the commodatum has been the fact that commodatum is essentially
constituted gratuitous
c. Has been delivered with appraisal -the thing b. bailee commits an act of ingratitude (Art.
loaned has been delivered with appraisal of 1948)
its value, UNLESS there is a stipulation • if the bailee should commit an offense
exempting the bailee from responsibility in against the person, the honor or the
case of a fortuitous event property of the bailor, or of the wife or
d. Lends the subject matter to a 3rd person - he children under his parental authority
lends or leases the thing to a third person • if the bailee imputes to the bailor any
who is not a member of his household criminal offense, or any act involving
e. Ingratitude - being able to save the thing moral turpitude, even though he should
borrowed or his own thing, he chose to save prove it, unless the crime or the act has
the latter been committed against the bailee
5. The bailee has NO RIGHT to retain the thing himself, his wife, or children under his
loaned as security for claims he has against authority; and
the bailor, even though they may be by reason • if the bailee unduly refuses the bailor
of extraordinary expenses (Art. 1944) support when the bailee is legally or
Reasons: morally bound to give support to the
a. Ownership remains in bailor – the bailee bailor
acquires only the use of thing, the ownership • Reason: the person who commits any of
of which remains w/ the bailor the acts of ingratitude makes himself
b. Only temporary use given to bailee – the unworthy of the trust reposed upon him
bailee would be violating the bailor’s trust in by the bailor.
him to return the thing as soon as the period •
stipulated expires or the purpose has been 2. May demand the thing at will when the contract is
accomplished QuickTime™ and a precarium
Exception: TIFFClaim for decompressor
(Uncompressed) damages suffered
are needed to see this picture. • PRECARIUM – a kind of commodatum
because the bailor doesn’t advise bailee of where the bailor may demand the thing at
the flaws known to him (Art. 1951) will. It has been defined as a contract by
6. A bailee doesn’t answer for the deterioration of which the owner of a thing, at the request of
the thing loaned due only to the use thereof another person, gives the latter the thing for
and without his fault use as long as the owner shall please
7. Liability when there are 2 or more bailees: The
presumption is that they are solidarily liable 3. To refund the extraordinary expenses (Art. 1949)
(Art. 1945)
KINDS OF DEPOSIT
1. judicial - when an attachment or seizure of DEPOSITOR NEED NOT BE THE OWNER OF THE
property in litigation is ordered THING:
2. extrajudicial (Art. 1967) GR: The depositor must be the owner of the thing
a. voluntary- delivery is made by the will of deposited.
the depositor or by two or more persons
Exceptions: It may belong to another person than with respect to of the debtor’s
the depositor. the thing property.
a. when two or more persons claiming to be deposited
entitled to a thing may deposit the same with
a third person. In such case, the third person OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEPOSITARY (SRT-CCC-
assumes the obligation to deliver to the one ULC-RITT-RPT-TL-HR)
to whom it belongs. 1. Two primary obligations (Art. 1972)
b. Interpleader – the action to compel the a. safekeeping of the object;
depositors to settle their conflicting claims. b. Return of the thing when required – even
Here one of the depositors is not the owner. though a specified term or time for such may
have been stipulated in the contract.
FORM OF CONTRACT OF DEPOSIT: • Degree of Care – same diligence as he
GR: A contract of deposit may be entered into orally would exercise over his property.
or in writing. (Art. 1969) • Reasons:
Exception: Delivery of the thing deposited. (It is a i. Essential requisite of judicial relation
real contract, hence, delivery is required for which involves the depositor’s
perfection.) confidence in his good faith and
trustworthiness;
Depositary - Depositary - ii. The presumption that the depositor
capacitated incapacitated took into account the diligence which
Depositor - Depositor - the depositary is accustomed with
incapacitated capacitated respect to his own property.
Depositary is subject to Depositary does not The depositary cannot excuse himself from
ALL the obligations of a incur the obligations of a liability in the event of loss by claiming that
depositary depositary he exercised the same amount of care
Depositary must return the Depositary, however is toward the thing deposited as he would
property either to: liable to: towards his own if such care is less than that
a) the legal representative a) return the thing required by the circumstances.
of the incapacitated, OR deposited while still in his
b) the depositor himself if possession; AND 2. Obligation not to transfer deposit (Art. 1973)
he should acquire b) pay the depositor the GR: the depositary is not allowed to deposit
capacity amount by which he may the thing with a third person.
have benefited himself Reason: A deposit is founded on trust and
with the thing or its price confidence and it can be supposed that the
subject to the right of any depositor, in choosing the depositary, has
3rd person who acquires taken into consideration the latter’s
the thing in good faith qualification.
Exception: The depositary is authorized by
Basis of Irregular Mutuum
express stipulation.
Comparison deposit
Liabilities: Depositary is liable for loss of the
Demandability Demandable at Lender is thing deposited when:
will of the bound by the a. He transfers the deposit with a third
irregular provisions of person without authority although there is
depositor for the contract no negligence on his part and the third
whose benefit and cannot person;
the deposit has seek restitution b. He deposits the thing with a third person
QuickTime™ and a
been constituted
TIFF (Uncompressed) decomuntil
pressor the time of
who is manifestly careless or unfit
are needed to see this picture.
payment as although authorized, even in the absence
provided in the of negligence; or
contract has c. The thing is lost through the negligence
arisen of his employees whether the latter are
Benefit Benefit accrues Necessity of manifestly careless or not.
to the depositor the borrower Exemption from liability: The thing is lost
Preference of Depositor has Enjoy no without the negligence of the third person
credit preference over preference in with whom he was allowed to deposit the
other creditors the distribution
thing if such third person is not “manifestly Exception: When there is a stipulation to the
careless or unfit.” contrary.
3. Obligation not to change the way of deposit 6. Obligation not to make use of the things
(Art. 1974) deposited (Art. 1977)
GR: Depositary may not change the way of GR: Deposit is for safekeeping of the subject
the deposit matter and not for its use.
Exception: If there are circumstances Exceptions:
indicating that the depositor would consent to a. Expressly authorized by the depositor;
the change. This is a situation wherein the b. Such use is necessary for its
depositary would reasonably presume that preservation but limited for the purpose
the depositor would agree to the change if he only.
knows of the facts of the situation. • Effect of unauthorized use: Liability for
Requisites: damages
a. The depositary must notify the depositor • Effects of authorized use: (Art. 1978)
of such change and a. If the thing deposited is non-consumable:
b. Must wait for the reply of the depositor to GR: The contract loses the character of a
such change. deposit and acquires that of a
Exception: If the delay of the reply would commodatum despite the fact that the
cause danger. parties may have denominated it as a
deposit.
4. Obligation to collect on the choses in action Exception: Safekeeping is still the
deposited (Art. 1975) principal purpose of the contract.
• If the thing deposited should earn interest, b. If the thing deposited is money or other
the depositary is under the obligation to: consumable thing:
a. Collect the interest as it becomes due; GR: Converts the contract into a simple
b. Take such steps as may be necessary to loan or mutuum.
preserve its value and the right Exception: Safekeeping is still the
corresponding to it. principal purpose of the contract, but it
• The depositary is bound to collect the capital, becomes an irregular deposit. Bank
as well as the interest, when due. deposits are in the nature of irregular
deposits but they are really loans
Contract of rent of safety deposit boxes governed by the law on loans.
(Art. 1975)
A contract for the rent of safety deposit boxes 7. Liability for loss through fortuitous event (Art.
is not an ordinary contract of lease of things, 1979)
but a special kind of deposit; hence, it is not GR: The depositary is not liable for loss
to be strictly governed by the provisions on through fortuitous event without his fault.
deposit. The prevailing rule in the US is that Exceptions:
the relation between a bank renting out a. If it is so stipulated;
safety deposit boxes and its customer with b. If he uses the thing without the
respect to the contents of the box is that of depositor’s permission
bailor and bailee. c. If he delays in its return;
d. If he allows others to use it, even though
5. Obligation not to commingle things if so he himself may have been authorized to
stipulated (Art. 1976) QuickTime™ and a use the same.
GR: The TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
depositary ispicture.permitted to
are needed to see this Note: Liability for loss without fortuitous event:
commingle grain or other articles of the same Depositary – presumed at fault (Art. 1265)
kind and quality. - in possession
Effects:
a. The various depositors of the mingled 8. Relation between bank and depositor (Art.
goods shall own the entire mass in 1980)
common. Fixed, savings, and current deposits of
b. Each depositor shall be entitled to such money in banks and similar institutions shall
portion of the entire as the amount be governed by the provisions concerning
deposited by him bears the whole. simple loan.
a. Contract of loan – deposits in banks are • GR: Each one of the depositors may
really loans because the bank can use do whatever may be useful to the
the same for its ordinary transactions others. (Art. 1212)
b. Relation of creditor and debtor – the Exception: Anything which may be
relation between a depositor and a bank prejudicial to the other depositors.
is that of a creditor and a debtor. • GR: The depositary may return the
thing to any one of the solidary
9. Obligation when the thing deposited is closed depositors
and sealed (Art. 1981) Exception: When a demand, judicial
The depositary has the obligation to: or extrajudicial, for its return has
a. return the thing deposited when delivered been made by one of them in which
closed and sealed in the same condition; case delivery should be made to him.
b. pay for damages should the seal or lock c. Return to one of the depositors stipulated
be broken through his fault, which is • if by stipulation, the thing should be
presumed unless proven otherwise; returned to one of the depositors, the
c. Keep the secret of the deposit when the depositary is bound to return it only to the
seal or lock is broken, with or without his person designated although he has not
fault. made any demand for its return.
10. When depositary justified in opening closed 16. Obligation to return to the person to whom
and sealed subject matter (Art. 1982) return must be made. (Art. 1986)
a. The depositary is presumed authorized a. The depositary is obliged to return the
to do so if the key has been delivered to thing deposited, when required, to:
him; • The depositor;
b. When the instructions of the depositor as • To his heirs or successors; or
regards the deposit cannot be executed • To the person who may have
without opening the box or receptacle. been designated in the contract.
(Necessity) b. If the depositor was incapacitated at the
time of making the deposit, the property
11. Obligation to return products, accessories must be returned to:
and accessions (Art. 1983) • His guardian or administrator;
• To the person who made the
12. Obligation to pay interest on sums converted deposit;
for personal use (Art. 1983)
• To the depositor himself should
he acquire capacity.
13. The depositary who receives the thing in
c. Even if the depositor had capacity at the
deposit cannot require that the depositor
time of making the deposit but he
prove his ownership over the thing (Art. 1984)
subsequently loses his capacity during
the deposit, the thing must be returned to
14. Where third person appears to be the owner
his legal representative.
(Art. 1984)
The depositary may be relieved from liability
17. Obligation to return at the place of return (Art.
when:
1987) – same as the general rule of law
a. He advised the true owner of the thing of
regarding the place of payment. (Art. 1251)
the deposit.
GR: At the place agreed upon by the parties,
b. If the owner, is spite of such information,
QuickTime™ and a transportation expenses shall be borne by
does not TIFF
claim it within
(Uncompressed) the period of one
decompressor
are needed to see this picture. the depositor.
month (30 days)
Exception: In the absence of stipulation, at
the place where the thing deposited might be
15. Obligation of the depositary when there are
even if it should not be the same place where
two or more depositors. (Art. 1985)
the original deposit was made.
a. Divisible thing and joint depositors –
each one of the depositors can demand
18. Obligation to return upon the time of return.
only his share proportionate thereto.
(Art. 1988)
b. Indivisible thing and solidary depositors –
rules on active solidarity
GR: The thing deposited must be returned to depositary by reason of the deposit. (see Art.
the depositor upon demand, even though a 1965, 1992, 1993).
specified period or time for such return may Note: The debt must be prior to the deposit.
have been fixed.
Exceptions: Irregular Deposit Mutuum
a. When the thing is judicially attached May be demanded at will Lender is bound by the
while in the depositary’s possession by the irregular depositor provision of the contract
b. When notified of the opposition of a third for whose benefit the and cannot seek
person to the return or the removal of the deposit has been restitution until the time
thing deposited. constituted for payment, as provided
in the contract has arisen
19. Right of the depositary to return the thing Only benefit is that which If with interest, benefit if
deposited. (Art. 1989) accrues to the depositor both parties
NOTE: in this case, it is the depositary who is
returning the deposit WITH OR WITHOUT THE Depositor has preference No preference
DEMAND of the depositor over other creditors
GR: The depositary may return the thing
deposited notwithstanding that a period has
been fixed for the deposit if: OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEPOSITOR (PLD)
a. The deposit is gratuitous;
b. The reason is justifiable. 1. Obligation to pay expenses of
Remedy if depositor refuses to receive the preservation. (Art. 1992)
thing: The depositary may deposit the thing
at the disposal of the judicial authority. 2. Obligation to pay losses incurred due to
Exception: When the deposit is for a character of thing deposited. (Art. 1993)
valuable consideration, the depositary has no GR: The depositary must be reimbursed for
right to return the thing before the expiration loss suffered by him because of the
of the time designated even if he should character of the thing deposited.
suffer inconvenience as a consequence. Exceptions:
a. Depositor was not aware of the danger;
20. Depositary’s liability in case of loss by force b. Depositor was not expected to know the
majeure or government order. (Art. 1990) dangerous character of the thing;
Depositary is not liable in cases of loss by c. Depositor notified the depositary of such
force majeur or by government order. dangerous character;
However, he has the duty to deliver to the d. Depositary was aware of the danger
depositor money or another thing he receives without advice from the depositor.
in place of the thing.
3. Effect of death of depositor or depositary.
21. Liability in case of alienation of the (Art. 1995)
depositary’s heir. (Art. 1991) a. Deposit gratuitous – death of either of the
When alienation is done in GOOD FAITH: depositor or depositary extinguishes the
a. Return the value of the thing deposited deposit (personal in nature). By the word
b. Assign the right to collect from the buyer. “extinguished,” the law really means that
• The heir does not need to pay the the depositary is not obliged to continue
actual price of the thing deposited. with the contract of deposit.
When alienation is done in BAD FAITH: b. Deposit for compensation – not
QuickTime™ and a
a. Liable forTIFF
damages;
(Uncompressed) decompressor extinguished by the death of either party.
are needed to see this picture.
b. Pay the actual price of the thing
deposited. Other Matters Concerning a Depositor
1. Depositary has a right to retain the thing in
22. Depositary may retain the thing in pledge pledge until full payment of what may be due
until the full payment of what may be due him him by reason of the deposit
by reason of the deposit. (Art. 1994) 2. A deposit is extinguished:
The thing retained serves as security for the a. upon the loss or deterioration of the thing
payment of what may be due to the deposited;
b. upon the death of the depositary, ONLY in When hotel-keeper not liable:
gratuitous deposits; a. The loss or injury is cause by force
c. other provisions in the Civil Code majeure, like flood, fire, theft or robbery
(novation, merger, etc.) by a stranger (not the hotel-keeper’s
servant or employee) with the use of
NECESSARY DEPOSIT firearms or irresistible force.
A deposit is necessary when: Exception: Unless the hotel-keeper is
1. It is made in compliance with a legal guilty of fault or negligence in failing to
obligation; provide against the loss or injury from his
cause.
2. It takes place on the occasion of any b. The loss is due to the acts pf the guests,
calamity, such as fire, storm, flood, his family, servants, visitors.
pillage, shipwreck, or other similar c. The loss arises from the character of the
events. things brought into the hotel.
*There must be a causal relation Exemption or diminution of liability:
between the calamity and the constitution The hotel-keeper cannot free himself
of the deposit. from responsibility by posting notices
to the effect that he is not liable for
3. Made by passengers with common the articles brought by the guest.
carriers. (Art. 2003)
• as to those baggage the passengers Effect: Any stipulation between the
or their agents carry hotel-keeper and the guest whereby
the responsibility of the former (as
4. Made by travelers in hotels or inns. (Art. set forth in Art. 1998-2001) is
1998) suppressed or diminished shall be
Before keepers of hotels or inns may be held VOID.
responsible as depositaries with regard to the Hotel-keeper’s right to retain
effects of their guests, the following must The hotel-keeper has a right to retain
concur: the things brought into the hotel by
Elements: the guest, as a security for credits on
a. They have been previously informed account of:
about the effects brought by the guests; a. lodging;
and b. supplies usually furnished to
b. The latter have taken the precautions hotel guests.
prescribed regarding their safekeeping. Reason: It is given to hotel-keepers
Extent of liability: to compensate them for the liabilities
a. Liability in hotel rooms which come under imposed upon them by law. The right
the term “baggage” or articles such as of retention recognized in this article
clothing as are ordinarily used by is in the nature of a pledge created
travelers by operation of law.
b. Include those lost or damages in hotel
annexes such as vehicles in the hotel’s • In compliance with a legal obligation
garage. (governed by the law establishing it, and in
When hotel-keeper liable: (Art. 2000 – case of deficiency, the rules on voluntary
2002) deposit e.g. Arts. 538, 586 and 2104)
NOTE: In the following cases, the hotel-
QuickTime™ and a • Made on the occasion of any calamity
keeper is liable REGARDLESS
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture. of the (governed by the rules on voluntary deposit
amount of care exercised: and Art. 2168)
a. The loss or injury to personal property is
caused by his servants or employees as
well as by strangers (Art. 2000). SEQUESTRATION OR JUDICIAL DEPOSIT
b. The loss is caused by the act of a thief or
robber done without the use of arms and When judicial deposit takes place: Judicial deposit
irresistible force. (Art. 2001) takes place when an attachment or seizure of
Reason: Hotel-keeper is apparently property in litigation is ordered by a court. (Art. 2005)
negligent. Nature: Auxiliary to a case pending in court.
Scope: all warehouses, whether public or private, NOTE: Effect of omission of any of the
bonded or not essential terms:
a. validity and negotiability of receipt is NOT
Application: applies to warehouse receipts issued by affected
a warehouseman as defined in Sec. 58(a), b. warehouseman will be liable for damages
while the Civil Code, to other cases where c. the contract will be converted to an
receipts are not issued by a ordinary deposit
warehouseman.
NOTE: a warehouseman does NOT have a any one who purchased for value in good
cause of action against a person to whom he faith such receipt
misdelivered the thing UNLESS the depositor
sues him. 5. Issuing receipt for non-existing goods or
misdescribed goods (Sec. 20):
ACTS FOR WHICH A WAREHOUSEMAN IS • GR: a warehouseman is under obligation
LIABLE: to deliver the identical property stored
with him and if he fails to do so, he is
1. Failure to stamp “duplicate” on copies of a liable.
negotiable receipt (Sec. 6 and 15) • Exception: if the description consists
• When more than one negotiable receipts are merely of marks or labels upon the goods
issued for the same goods, the word or upon the packages containing them,
“duplicate” must be plainly placed by the etc., the warehouseman is NOT liable
warehouseman upon the face of every such even if the goods are not of the kind as
receipt except the 1st. In such case, the indicated in the marks or labels
warehouseman warrants:
a. that the duplicate is an accurate copy of 6. In case of lost or destroyed receipts (Sec. 14)
the original receipt • Remember that a warehouseman must deliver
b. such original receipt is uncancelled at the to the one who has the receipt but if such was
date of the issue of the duplicate lost, a competent court may order the delivery
• NOTE: The duplicate imposes no other of the goods only:
liability upon the warehouseman. a. upon proof of the loss or destruction of
the receipt; AND
2. Failure to place “non-negotiable” on a non- b. upon giving of a bond with sufficient
negotiable receipt (Sec. 7) securities
• NOTE: the warehouseman is still liable to
3. Misdelivery of the goods (Sec. 10) a holder of the receipt for value without
• To one not lawfully entitled to possession: notice since the warehouseman can
Liable for conversion (unauthorized secure himself in the bond given.
assumption and exercise of the right of
ownership over goods belonging to another 7. Failure to take care of the goods (Sec. 12)
through alteration or the exclusion of the
owner’s right) 8. Failure to give notice in case of sales of
• To a person entitled to delivery under a non- goods to satisfy his lien (Sec. 33) or because
negotiable receipt or written authorization OR the goods are perishable and hazardous (Sec.
person in possession of a negotiable receipt 34)
Still liable for conversion if:
a. prior to delivery, he had been requested EFFECTS OF ALTERED RECEIPTS:
NOT to make such delivery 1. Alteration immaterial: whether fraudulent or
b. he had received notice of the adverse not, authorized or not, the warehouseman is
claim or title of a 3rd person liable on the altered receipt according to its
original tenor;
4. Failure to effect cancellation of a negotiable 2. Alteration material: but it was authorized,
receipt upon delivery of the goods (Sec. 11) the warehouseman is liable according to the
• This is applicable ONLY to negotiable receipts terms of the receipts as altered;
but NOT to a situation whereandthere
QuickTime™ a was a valid 3. Material alteration innocently made:
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
sale in accordance withto see
are needed Sec. 36
this picture. though unauthorized, the warehouseman is
a. When the goods are delivered already: liable on the altered receipt according to its
Failure to cancel will make him liable to original term;
any one who purchased for value in good 4. Material alteration fraudulently made:
faith such receipt warehouseman is liable according to the
b. When only some of the goods were original tenor to a:
delivered: Failure to cancel or to state a. purchaser of the receipt for value
plainly in the receipt that some goods without notice; and
were delivered will make him liable to b. to the alterer and subsequent
purchasers with notice ( BUT his
liability is limited only to delivery as NOTE: This does NOT apply to cases where the
he is excused from any other liability) warehouseman himself makes a claim to the
goods.
* Even a fraudulent alteration cannot divest the title of
the owner of stored goods and the warehouseman is COMMINGLING OF DEPOSITED GOODS
liable to return them to the owner. BUT a bona fide • GR: A warehouseman may not mingle goods
holder acquires no right to the goods under a belonging to different depositors.
negotiable receipt which has been stolen or lost or Exception: In case of fungible goods of the
which the indorsement has been forged. same kind and grade provided:
a. he is authorized by agreement
b. he is authorized by custom
WITH REGARD TO OWNERSHIP • Effects:
1. Ownership is not a defense for refusal to deliver a. each depositor shall own the entire mass in
• The warehouseman cannot refuse to deliver common and entitled to his portion
the goods on the ground that he has b. warehouseman is severally liable to each
acquired title or right to the possession of it depositor for the care and redelivery of
unless such is derived: their portion as if the goods had been kept
a. directly or indirectly from a transfer made by separate
the depositor at the time of the deposit for
storage or subsequent thereto; ATTACHMENT OR LEVY OF NEGOTIABLE
b. from the warehouseman’s lien RECEIPTS
2. Adverse title of a 3rd person is not a defense for • A warehouseman has the obligation to hold
refusal to deliver by a warehouseman to his the goods for the owner or for the person to
bailor on demand EXCEPT: whom the negotiable receipt has been duly
a. To persons to whom the goods must be negotiated. Therefore, the goods cannot be
livered (Sec. 9) attached or levied upon under an execution
b. To the person who wins in the interpleader UNLESS:
case (Sec. 17) a. the document be first surrendered; or
c. To the person he finds to be entitled to the b. the negotiation is enjoined, or
possession after investigation (Sec. 18) c. the document is impounded by the
d. To the buyer in case there was a valid sale of court
the goods (Sec. 36) • The warehouseman cannot be compelled to
deliver the goods until:
a. the receipt is surrendered to him;
DUTY OF WAREHOUSEMAN WHEN THERE ARE b. it is impounded by the court
SEVERAL CLAIMANTS NOTE: This provision does NOT apply if the
The warehouseman may either: person depositing is NOT the owner of the goods
1. Investigate and determine within a or one who has not the right to convey title to the
reasonable time the validity of the claims, goods binding upon the owner.
and deliver to the person whom he finds is
entitled to the possession of the goods REMEDY OF CREDITOR WHOSE DEBTOR OWNS
Effect: He is NOT excused from liability in A NEGOTIABLE RECEIPT
case he makes a mistake Attachment of the negotiable receipt (NOT the goods)
2. He may bring a complaint in interpleader NOTE: the goods themselves cannot readily be
Effect: attached or levied upon by ordinary legal process
a. he will be relieved QuickTime™ and a
from liability in
delivering theTIFF
goods
are neededto thethis person
(Uncompressed) decompressor
to see picture. whom the EXTENT OF WAREHOUSEMAN’S LIEN
court finds to have better right; 1. lawful charges for
b. he is liable for refusal to deliver to the a. storage, and
rightful claimant when it is required to have b. preservation of the goods
an interpleader; 2. lawful claims for
3. He may not do (a) and (b) a. money advanced
Effect: He will be liable after a lapse of a b. labor
reasonable time, of conversion as of the date c. interest
of the original demand for the goods. d. weighing
e. insurance
5. From the proceeds of the sale: GUARANTY (2047) - By guaranty, a person called
a. the warehouseman shall satisfy his lien the guarantor, binds himself to the creditor, to fulfill
b. including the reasonable charges of notice, the obligation of the principal debtor in case the latter
advertisement and sale should fail to do so. It is a contract between the
c. the balance shall be held by the guarantor and the creditor.
warehouseman and delivered on demand
to the person to whom he should deliver it
6. Any time before the goods are sold, any person CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CONTRACT
may pay the warehouseman for his lien and the
other expenses. The warehouseman shall deliver 1. Accessory – dependent for its existence
the goods to that person if he is entitled under this upon the principal obligation guaranteed by
Act, to the possession of the goods on payment of it;
the charges. Otherwise, the warehouseman shall 2. Subsidiary and conditional – takes effect
retain ownership of the goods. only when the principal debtor fails in his
obligation subject to limitation
• With regard to perishable and hazardous 3. Unilateral –
goods a. It gives rise only to a duty on the part of
Warehouseman will give notice to owner or the guarantor in relation to the creditor
person in whose name the goods are stored: and not vice versa
a. to satisfy his lien b. It may be entered into even without the
b. to remove the goods intervention of the principal debtor.
c. failure to do a &b will give the 4. Guarantor must be a person distinct from
warehouseman authority to sell the the debtor – a person cannot be the
goods without advertising personal guarantor of himself
d. if sale is not possible, he may
dispose of the goods in any lawful CLASSIFICATION OF GUARANTY
manner without liability
• Proceeds of the sale shall be disposed of in 1. Guaranty in the broad sense:
accordance with the PROCESS in the sale of a. Personal – guaranty is the credit
the goods. given by the person who guarantees
the fulfillment of the principal
• Effects of sale obligation; or
a. warehouseman is NOT liable for non- b. Real – guaranty is property,
delivery even if the receipt was given for movable, or immovable
the goods when they were deposited be i. Real mortgage (2124) or
negotiated antichresis (2132) – guaranty is
b. when the sale was made without the immovable
publication required and before the time ii. Chattel mortgage (2140) or
specified by law, such sale is void and the pledge (2093) – guaranty is
purchaser of the goods acquires no title in movable
them 2. As to its origin:
a. Conventional – constituted by
NEGOTIATION AND TRANSFER OF RECEIPTS agreement of the parties (2051[1])
Negotiable receipts negotiable by delivery b. Legal – imposed by virtue of a
1. if the goods are deliverable to the bearer; provision of law
or QuickTime™ and a
c. Judicial – required by a court to
2. when indorsed TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
in blank;
are needed to see thisor
picture.
guarantee the eventual right of one
3. person to whose order the goods are of the parties in a case.
delivered or by a subsequent indorsee 3. As to consideration:
indorsed it to bearer a. Gratuitous – guarantor does not
receive any price or remuneration for
acting as such (2048)
b. Onerous – one where the guarantor
GUARANTY AND SURETYSHIP
receives valuable consideration for
his guaranty
4. As to person guaranteed:
debtor for the reason that the latter’s pure or subject to a suspensive or resolutory
obligation is not civilly enforceable. condition.
When the debtor himself offers a guaranty for
1. Principal obligation subject to a
his natural obligation, he impliedly recognizes
suspensive condition – the guarantor is
his liability, thereby transforming the
liable only after the fulfillment of the
obligation from a natural into a civil one.
condition.
2. Principal obligation subject to a
resolutory condition – the happening of the
GUARANTY OF FUTURE DEBTS (2053)
condition extinguishes both the principal
Continuing Guaranty or Suretyship: obligation and the guaranty
1. Not limited to a single transaction but which
contemplates a future course of dealings,
covering a series of transactions generally for
GUARANTOR’S LIABILITY CANNOT EXCEED
an indefinite time or until revoked.
PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION (2054)
2. It is prospective in its operation and is
generally intended to provide security with GR: Guaranty is a subsidiary and accessory
respect to future transactions. contract – guarantor cannot bind himself for more
3. Future debts, even if the amount is not yet than the principal debtor and even if he does, his
known, may be guaranteed but there can be liability shall be reduced to the limits of that of the
no claim against the guarantor until the debtor. But the guarantor may bind himself for less
amount of the debt is ascertained or fixed than that of the principal.
and demandable.
Exceptions:
Reason: A contract of guaranty is subsidiary.
1. Interest, judicial costs, and attorney’s fees as
a. To secure the payment of a loan at
part of damages may be recovered – creditors
maturity – surety binds himself to
suing on a suretyship bond may recover from the
guarantee the punctual payment of a
surety as part of their damages, interest at the
loan at maturity and all other obligations
legal rate, judicial costs, and attorney’s fees
of indebtedness which may become due
when appropriate, even without stipulation and
or owing to the principal by the borrower.
even if the surety would thereby become liable to
b. To secure payment if any debt to be
pay more than the total amount stipulated in the
subsequently incurred – a guaranty
bond.
shall be construed as continuing when by
the terms therof it is evident that the • Reason: Surety is made to pay, not by
object is to give a standing credit to the reason of the contract, but by reason of his
principal debtor to be used from time to failure to pay when demanded and for
time either indefinitely or until a certain having compelled the creditor to resort to
period, especially if the right to recall the the courts to obtain payment.
guaranty is expressly reserved. Interest runs from:
c. To secure existing unliquidated debts
– refer to debts existing at the time of the a. Filing of the complaint (upon judicial
constitution of the guaranty but the demand); or
amount thereof is unknown and not to b. The time demand was made upon
dents not yet incurred and existing at that the surety until the principal
time. The surety agreement itself is valid obligation is fully paid (upon extra-
and binding QuickTime™ and a
even before the principal judicial demand)
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
obligation intended to be secured thereby 2. Penalty may be provided – a surety may be
is born, any more than there would be in held liable for the penalty provided for in a
saying that obligations which are subject bond for violation of the condition therein.
to a condition precedent are valid and
binding before the occurrence of the Principal’s liability may exceed
condition precedent guarantor’s obligations
The amount specified in a surety bond as the
GUARANTY OF CONDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS: A surety’s obligation does not limit the extent of
guaranty may secure all kinds of obligations, be they the damages that may be recovered from the
principal, the latter’s liability being governed unfair and unreasonable for it practically
by the obligations he assumed under his nullifies the nature of the undertaking it had
contract. assumed.
Reason: The liability of the surety attaches
as soon as the principal debtor defaults, and
GUARANTY NOT PRESUMED (2055) notice thereof is given the surety within a
reasonable time to enable it to take steps to
Guaranty requires the expression of consent on the
protect its interest.
part of the guarantor to be bound. It cannot be
presumed because of the existence of a contract or Remedy of surety: Foreclose the counterbond put
principal obligation. up by the principal debtor (if there is any)
Reasons:
1. There be assurance that the guarantor had GUARANTY DISTINGUISHED FROM WARRANTY
the true intention to bind himself;
GUARANTY WARRANTY
2. To make certain that on making it, the
guarantor proceeded with consciousness of Contract by which a An undertaking that the title,
what he was doing. person is bound to quality, or quantity of the
another for the subject matter of a contract
GUARANTY COVERED BY THE STATUTE OF fulfillment of a is what it has been
FRAUDS promise or represented to be, and
engagement of a third relates to some agreement
• Guaranty must not only be expressed but party made ordinarily by the party
must so be reduced into writing. who makes the warranty
• Hence, it shall be unenforceable by action,
unless the same or some note or
memorandum thereof be in writing, and GUARANTY DISTINGUISHED FROM SURETYSHIP
subscribed by the party charged, or by his
agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement GUARANTY SURETYSHIP
cannot be received without the writing, or a Liability depends upon Assumes liability as a
secondary evidence of its contents. an independent regular party to the
• It need not appear in a public document. agreement to pay the undertaking
obligation if the primary
GUARANTY STRICTLY CONSTRUED debtor fails to do so
Strictly construed against the creditor in favor of the Engagement is a Charged as an original
guarantor and is not be extended beyond its terms or collateral undertaking promisor
specified limits.
Secondarily liable – he Primarily liable –
If there is any doubt on the terms and conditions of contracts to pay if, by undertakes directly for
the guaranty or surety agreements, the doubt should the use of due the payment without
be resolved in favor of the guarantor or surety. diligence, the dent reference to the solvency
1. Liability for obligation stipulated – cannot be paid of the principal, and is so
guarantor is liable only for the obligation of responsible at once the
the debtor stipulated upon, and not to latter makes default,
obligations assumed previous to the without any demand by
execution of the
QuickTime™ and a
guaranty
TIFF (Uncompressed) unless an intent to
decompressor
the creditor upon the
are needed to see this picture.
be so liable is clearly indicated. principal whatsoever or
2. Liability of surety limited to a fixed period any notice of default
– the surety must only be bound in the Only binds himself to Undertakes to pay if the
manner and to the extent, and under the pay if the principal principal does not pay,
circumstances which are set forth or which cannot or unable to pay without regard to his
may be inferred from the contract of guaranty ability to do so
or suretyship, and no farther.
3. Liability of surety to expire on maturity of Insurer of the solvency Insurer of the debt
principal obligation – such stipulation is
Remedy of creditor: Demand another guarantor Exception: The creditor may, prior thereto, secure a
with the proper qualifications judgment against the guarantor, who shall be entitled,
however, to a deferment of the execution of said
Exception: Creditor may waive it if he chooses and judgment against him, until after the properties of the
hold the guarantor to his bargain. principal debtor shall have been exhausted, to satisfy
Article 2057: the latter’s obligation.
i. If the debtor becomes insolvent, the exhaustion of the principal’s property cannot
liability of the guarantor as the even begin to take place before judgment
debtor cannot fulfill his obligation has been obtained.
d. When he (debtor) has absconded, or 2. Actual demand to be made – joining the
cannot be sued within the Philippines – guarantor in the suit against the principal
the creditor is not required to go after a debtor is not the demand intended by law
debtor who is hiding or cannot be sued
in our courts, and to incur the delays
DUTY OF THE GUARANTOR TO SET UP BENEFIT
and expenses incident thereto.
OF EXCUSSION (2060)
Exception: Debtor has left a
manager or representative; As soon as he is required to pay, guarantor must also
point out to the creditor available property (not in
e. If it may be presumed that an execution
litigation or encumbered) of the debtor within the
on the property of the principal debtor
Philippines.
would not result in the satisfaction of the
obligation – if such judicial action
including execution would not satisfy the
obligation, the guarantor can no longer DUTY OF THE CREDITOR TO RESORT TO ALL
require the creditor to resort to all such LEGAL REMEDIES (2061)
remedies against the debtor as the 1. After the guarantor has fulfilled the conditions
same would be but a useless formality. required for making use of the benefit of
It is not necessary that the debtor be exhaustion, it becomes the duty of the
judicially declared insolvent. creditor to:
2. If he does not comply with Art. 2060: In 2. Exhaust all the property of the debtor pointed
order that the guarantor may make use of the out by the guarantor;
benefit of excussion, he must: 3. If he fails to do so, he shall suffer the loss but
a. Set it up against the creditor upon the only to the extent of the value of the said
latter’s demand for payment from him; property, for the insolvency of the debtor.
b. Point out to the creditor:
i. Available property of the debtor – JOINDER OF GUARANTOR AND PRINCIPAL AS
the guarantor should facilitate the PARTIES DEFENDANT
realization of the excussion since he
is the most interested in its benefit. GR: The guarantor, not being a joint contractor with
ii. Within the Philippine territory – his principal, cannot be sued with his principal.
excussion of property located Exception: Where it would serve merely to delay the
abroad would be a lengthy and ultimate accounting of the guarantor or if no different
extremely difficult proceeding and result would be attained if the plaintiff were forced to
would not conform with the purpose institute separate actions against the principal and
of the guaranty to provide the the guarantors.
creditor with the means of obtaining
the fulfillment of the obligation.
iii. Sufficient to cover the amount of the PROCEDURE WHEN CREDITOR SUES (2062)
debt.
3. If he is a judicial bondsman and sub- 1. Sent against the principal – as a rule, the
surety (2084) creditor may hold the guarantor only after
4. Where a pledge or mortgage has been judgment has been obtained against the
given by himTIFF as(Uncompressed)
a special
QuickTime™ andsecurity.
a principal debtor and the latter is unable to
decompressor
5. If he fails to interpose it as a defense
are needed to see this picture. pay.
before judgment is rendered against him. 2. Notice to guarantor of the action –
guarantor must be notified so that he may
appear, if he so desires, and set up defenses
he may want to offer
DUTY OF CREDITOR TO MAKE PRIOR DEMAND a. Guaranty appears – voluntary
FOR PAYMENT FROM GUARANTOR (2060) appearance does not constitute a
renunciation of his right to excussion.
1. When demand to be made – only after b. Guaranty does not appear –
judgment on the debt for obviously the
Reason: The guarantor cannot be allowed, through REMEDY TO WHICH THE GUARANTOR
his own fault or negligence to prejudice or impair the ENTITLED
rights or interests of the debtor.
GR: The guarantor cannot demand reimbursement
for indemnity because he has not paid the obligation.
EFFECT OF PAYMENT BY GUARANTOR BEFORE Exceptional remedies:
MATURITY (2069)
1. To obtain release from the guaranty; or
Debtor’s obligation with a period – demandable 2. To demand security that shall protect him
only when the day fixed comes. from:
a. Any proceedings by the creditor; and
1. The guarantor who pays before maturity is
b. Against the insolvency of the debtor.
not entitled to reimbursement since there is
Guarantor’s remedies are alternative. He has the
no necessity for accelerating payment.
right to choose the action to bring.
2. A contract of guaranty being subsidiary in
character, the guarantor is not liable for the
debt before it becomes due.
SUIT BY GUARANTOR AGAINST CREDITOR
Exception: The debtor will be liable if the
BEFORE PAYMENT
payment was made:
The guaranty’s or surety’s action for release can only
a. With his consent; or
be exercised against the principal debtor and not
b. Subsequently ratified by him (ratification
against the creditor.
may be express or implied)
Reason: Release of the guarantor imports an
extinction in the obligation to the creditor; it connotes
RIGHT OF GUARANTOR TO PROCEED AGAINST
therefore, either a remission or novation by
DEBTOR BEFORE PAYMENT (2071)
subrogation, and either operation requires the
GR: Guarantor has no cause of action against the creditor’s assent for its validity.
debtor until after the former has paid the obligation.
Exceptions: 2071 enumerates instances when the
2066 AND 2071 DISTINGUISHED
guarantor may proceed against the debtor even
before the payment. 2066 2071
1. When he is sued for the payment; (Right of Guarantor to (Right of Guarantor to
2. In case of insolvency of the principal debtor; Reimbursement after Proceed against Debtor
3. When the debtor has bound himself to relieve Payment) even before payment)
him from the guaranty within a specified
period, and this period has expired; Provides for the Provides for the
4. When the debt has become demandable, by enforcement of the rights protection before he has
reason of the expiration of the period for of the guarantor against paid but after he has
payment; the debtor after he has become liable – gives a
5. After the lapse of 10 years, when the paid the debt – gives a protective remedy before
principal obligation has no fixed period for its right of action after payment
maturity, unless it be of such nature that it payment
cannot be extinguished except within a
Substantive right Preliminary remedy
period longer than 10 years;
6. If there are reasonable grounds to fear that Gives a right of action, Remedy given seeks to
QuickTime™ and a
the principal debtor intends
TIFF (Uncompressed) to abscond;
decompressor which, without the obtain from the guarantor
are needed to see this picture.
7. If the principal debtor is in imminent danger provisions of the other “release from the
of becoming insolvent. might be worthless guaranty or to demand a
Purpose: To enable the guarantor to take measures security that shall protect
for the protection of his interest in view of the him from any proceedings
probability that he would be called upon to pay the by the creditor and from
debt. the danger of insolvency
of the debtor.”
Material Alteration of Principal Contract – any Effect: Guarantor is discharged from his undertaking.
agreement between the creditor and the principal
Reason: Necessity of avoiding of prejudice to the
debtor which essentially varies the terms of the
guarantor. The debtor may become insolvent during
principal contract without the consent of the surety,
the extension, thus depriving the guarantor of his
will release the surety from liability.
right to reimbursement.
Such material alteration would constitute a novation
It is unimportant whether the extension given has
or change of the principal contract, which is
actually proved prejudicial or not to the guarantor or
consequently extinguished. Upon such
surety. Nor does it matter for how short a period the
extinguishments, the accessory contract to guaranty
time of payment has been extended.
is also terminator and the guarantor cannot be held
liable on the new contract to which he has not given Extension must be based on some new agreement
his consent. between the creditor and the principal debtor by
virtue of which the creditor deprives him of his claim.
When Alteration Material – where such change will
have the effect of making the obligation more 1. Where obligation payable in installments:
onerous. where a guarantor is liable for different
payments:
Imposes a new obligation or added burden on the
GR: An extension of time to one or more will
party promising; or
not affect the liability of the surety for the
1. Takes away some obligation already others.
imposed, changing the legal effect of the
Exception: When the unpaid balance has
original contract and not merely the form
become automatically due by virtue of an
thereof.
acceleration clause for failure to pay an
installment.
RELEASE BY CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY
Effect of exception: The act of the creditor
(2077)
extending the payment of said installment,
GR: Payment is made in money. without the guarantor’s consent, discharges
the guarantor.
Exception: Any substitute paid in lieu of money
which is accepted by the creditor extinguishes the Reason: The extension constitutes an
obligation and in consequence, the guaranty. extension of the payment of the whole
amount of the indebtedness
In case of eviction: Eviction revives the principal
obligation but not the guaranty. 2. Where consent to an extension is waived
in advance by the guarantor: Such waiver
Reason: The creditor’s action against the debtor is
is not contrary to law, nor to public policy
for eviction and this is different from what the
Effect: Amounts to the surety’s consent to all
guarantor guaranteed.
the extensions granted.
Exception: Those, which are purely personal to the 1. Liability is contractual and accessory but
debtor. direct:
2. Liability is limited by terms of contract
3. Liability arises only if principal debtor is
LEGAL AND JUDICIAL BONDS held liable
a. In the absence of collusion, the
MEANING AND FORM OF BOND (2082) surety is bound by a judgment
BOND – an undertaking that is sufficiently secured, against the principal event though he
and not cash or currency. was not a party to the proceedings;
b. The creditor may sue, separately or
Bondsman – a surety offered in virtue of a provision together, the principal debtor and the
of law or a judicial order. surety;
Qualifications of personal bondsman: c. A demand or notice of default is not
required to fix the surety’s liability
1. He possesses integrity; Exception: Where required by the
2. He has capacity to bind himself; provisions of the contract of
3. He has sufficient property to answer for suretyship
the obligation which he guarantees.
d. A surety bond is void where there is
not principal debtor because such an
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE IN LIEU OF BOND undertaking presupposes that the
(2083) obligation is to be enforceable
Guaranty or suretyship is a personal security. against someone else besides the
surety, and the latter can always
Pledge or mortgage is a property or real security. claim that it was never his intention
If the person required to give a legal or judicial bond to be the sole person obligated
should not be able to do so, a pledge or mortgage thereby.
sufficient to cover the obligation shall be admitted in NOTE: Surety is not entitled to exhaustion
lieu thereof. 4. Undertaking is to creditor, not to debtor:
BONDSMAN NOT ENTITLED TO EXCUSSION The surety makes no covenant or agreement
(2084) with the principal that it will fulfill the
obligation guaranteed for the benefit of the
A judicial bondsman and the sub-surety are not principal. The surety’s undertaking is that the
entitled to the benefit of excussion. principal shall fulfill his obligation and that the
Reason: They are not mere guarantors, but sureties surety shall be relieved of liability when the
whose liability is primary and solidary. obligation secured is performed.
Exception: Unless otherwise expressly
Effect of negligence of creditor: Mere negligence provided.
on the part of the creditor in collecting from the debtor
will not relieve the surety from liability. NOTE: Surety is not entitled to notice of
principal’s default
5. Prior demand by the creditor upon
SURETYSHIP – a relation which exists where one principal not required
person (principal) has undertaken an obligation and Surety is not exonerated by neglect of
another person (surety) is also under a direct and creditor to sue principal
primary obligation or other duty to the obligee, who is
QuickTime™ and a
entitled to but one performance,
TIFF (Uncompressed)and as between the
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
two who are bound, the second, rather than the first STRICTISSIMI JURIS RULE APPLICABLE ONLY
should perform. TO ACCOMMODATION SURETY
If a person binds himself solidarily with the principal Reason: An accommodation surety acts without
debtor, the contract is called suretyship and the motive of pecuniary gain and hence, should be
guarantor is called a surety. protected against unjust pecuniary impoverishment
by imposing on the principal, duties akin to those of a
fiduciary.
NATURE OF SURETY’S UNDERTAKING
This rule will apply only after it has been definitely appears in the certificate of title and does not
ascertained that the contract is one of suretyship or have to inquire further.
guaranty. 5. pledgor or mortgagor has free disposal of
property
6. thing pledged or mortgaged may be
STRICTISSIMI JURIS RULE NOT APPLICABLE TO alienated.
COMPENSATED SURETIES 7. creditor not required to sue to enforce his
credit
Reasons: 8. pledgor or mortgagor may be third person
1. Compensated corporate sureties are
business association organized for the
purpose of assuming classified risks in large
numbers, for profit and on an impersonal PLEDGE MORTGAGE
basis. Constituted on movables Constituted on
2. They are secured from all possible loss by immovables
adequate counter-bonds or indemnity Property is delivered to Delivery not necessary
agreements. the pledgee, or by
3. Such corporations are in fact insurers and in common consent to a 3rd
determining their rights and liabilities, the person
rules peculiar to suretyship do not apply.
Not valid against 3rd Not valid against 3rd
persons unless a persons if not registered
description of the thing
PROVISIONS COMMON TO PLEDGE AND pledged and the date of
MORTGAGE (Art 2085-2123) the pledge appear in a
public instrument
ESSENTIAL REQUISITES TO CONTRACTS OF
PLEDGE AND MORTGAGE: RIGHT OF CREDITOR WHERE DEBTOR FAILS TO
1. constituted to secure the fulfillment of a COMPLY WITH HIS OBLIGATION
principal obligation 1. creditor is merely entitled to move for the
2. pledgor or mortgagor be the absolute owner sale of the thing pledged or mortgaged with
of the thing pledged or mortgaged the formalities required by law in order to
3. the persons constituting the pledge or collect
mortgage have the free disposal of their 2. creditor cannot appropriate to himself the
property, and in the absence thereof, that thing nor can he dispose of the same as
they be legally authorized for the purpose owner.
4. cannot exist without a valid obligation
5. debtor retains the ownership of the thing PROHIBITION AGAINST PACTUM
given as a security COMMISSORIUM
6. when the principal obligation becomes due, 1. stipulation is null and void - stipulation
the thing in which the pledge or mortgage where thing or mortgaged shall automatically
consists may be alienated for the payment to become the property of the creditor in the
the creditor. event of nonpayment of the debt within the
term fixed
IMPORTANT POINTS 2. Requisites of pactum commissorium:
1. future property cannot be pledged or a. there should be a pledge or
mortgaged TIFF (Uncompressed)
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor mortgage
2. pledge/mortgage executed
are needed to see thisby one who is not
picture.
b. there should be a stipulation for an
the owner of the property pledged or automatic appropriation by the
mortgaged is without legal existence and creditor of the property in the event
registration cannot validate it. of nonpayment
3. mortgage of a conjugal property by one of 3. Effect on Security Contract
the spouses is valid only as to ½ of the entire -nullity of the stipulation does not affect
property validity and efficacy of the principal contract
4. in case of property covered by Torrens title, a
mortgagee has the right to rely upon what
REAL MORTGAGE (Arts. 2124-2131) LEGAL MORTGAGE: the persons in whose favor
It is a contract whereby the debtor secures to the the law establishes a mortgage have on other right
creditor the fulfillment of a principal obligation, than to demand the execution and the recording of
specially subjecting to such security immovable the document in which the mortgage is formalized.
property or real rights over immovable property in
case the principal obligation is not complied with at INCIDENTS OF REGISTRATION OF MORTGAGE
the time stipulated. 1. Mortgagee entitled to registration of
mortgage as a matter of right
OBJECTS OF REAL MORTGAGE: 2. Proceedings for registration do not determine
1. immovables validity of mortgage or its effect
2. alienable real rights in accordance with the 3. Registration is without prejudice to better
laws, imposed upon immovables right of third parties
* future property cannot be object of 4. Mortgage deed once duly registered forms
mortgage part of the records for the registration of the
property mortgaged
IMPORTANT POINTS 5. Mortgage by surviving spouse of his/her
1. As a general rule, the mortgagor retains undivided share of conjugal property can be
possession of the property he may deliver registered
said property to the mortgagee without
altering the nature of the contract of EFFECT OF INVALIDITY OF MORTGAGE ON
mortgage. PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION
2. It is not an essential requisite that the 1. principal obligation remains valid
principal of the credit bears interest, or that 2. mortgage deed remains as evidence of a
the interest as compensation for the use of personal obligation
the principal and the enjoyment of its fruits be
in the form of a certain percent thereof. EFFECT OF MORTGAGE
1. creates real rights, a lien inseparable from
KINDS OF MORTGAGE: QuickTime™ and a the property mortgaged, enforceable against
1. voluntary TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
the whole world
2. legal 2. creates merely an encumbrance
3. equitable – one which, although it lacks the
proper formalities of a mortgage shows the LAWS GOVERNING MORTGAGE
intention of the parties to make the property 1. New Civil Code
as a security for a debt 2. PD 1952
(provisions governing equitable mortgage - 3. Revised Administrative Code
arts 1365, 1450, 1454, 1602, 1603, 1604 and 4. RA 4882, as regards aliens becoming
1607) mortgages
5. debtor has the right to redeem the property 2. If the deficiency is embodied in a judgment, it
sold within 1 year from and after the date of is referred to as deficiency judgment.
sale 3. Action for recovery of deficiency may be filed
6. remedy of party aggrieved by foreclosure is a even during redemption period.
petition to set aside sale and cancellation of 4. Action to recover prescribes after 10 years
writ of possession. from the time the right of action accrues
The creditor, unless The creditor has no It is a contract by virtue of which a personal property
there is stipulation to such obligation is recorded in the Chattel Mortgage Register as
the contrary, is obliged security for the performance of an obligation.
to pay the taxes and NOTE: If the movable, instead of being recorded is
charges upon the delivered to the creditor, it is pledge and not
estate chattel mortgage.
It is expressly There is no such
stipulated that the obligation on part of CHATTEL MORTGAGE PLEDGE
creditor given mortgagee Involves movable Involves movable
possession of the property property
property shall apply all Delivery of the personal Delivery of the personal
the fruits thereof to the property is NOT property is necessary
payment of interest, if necessary
owing, and thereafter
Registration is necessary Registration is NOT
to the principal
for validity necessary for validity
Subject matter of both
Procedure: Sec 14 of Act Procedure: Art 2112 of
is real property
no 1508, as amended Civil Code
OBLIGATIONS OF ANTICHRETIC CREDITOR If the property is If the property is sold, the
(FAT-P) foreclosed, the excess debtor is not entitled to
1. to pay taxes and charges on the estate, over the amount due the to the excess
including necessary expenses goes to the debtor UNLESS it is otherwise
NOTE: Creditor may avoid said obligation agreed or in case of legal
by: pledge
a. compelling debtor to reacquire Creditor is entitled to Creditor is not entitled to
enjoyment of the property deficiency from the recover deficiency
b. by stipulation to the contrary debtor EXCEPT if it is a notwithstanding any
2. to apply all the fruits, after receiving security for the purchase stipulation to the contrary
them, to the payment of interest, if of personal property in
owing, and thereafter to the principal installments
3. to render an account of the fruits to the
debtor LAWS GOVERNING CHATTEL MORTGAGE
4. to bear the expenses necessary for its 1. Chattel Mortgage Law, Act No. 1508, as
preservation and repair amended
2. Civil Code
REMEDIES OF CREDITOR IN CASE OF NON- 3. Revised Administrative Code
PAYMENT OF DEBT 4. Revised Penal Code
1. action for specific performance 5. Ship Mortgage Decree of 1978 (PD 1521)
2. petition for the sale of the real property as in governs mortgage of vessels of domestic
a foreclosure of mortgages under Rule 68 of ownership
the Rules of Court
NOTES: AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD FAITH - An oath in a contract
• the parties, however, may agree on an of chattel mortgage wherein the parties "severally
extrajudicial foreclosure in the same swear that the mortgage is made for the purpose of
manner as they are allowed in contracts securing the obligation specified in the conditions
of mortgage and pledge
QuickTime™ and a (Tavera v. El
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
thereof and for no other purposes and that the same
Hogar Filipino, Inc. 68 Phil
are needed to see this 712)
picture. is a just and valid obligation and one not entered into
• a stipulation authorizing the antichretic for the purpose of fraud.
creditor to appropriate the property upon
the non-payment of the debt within the EFFECT OF REGISTRATION
agreed period is void (Art. 2088) 1. creates real rights
2. adds nothing to mortgage
CHATTEL MORTGAGE (Arts. 2140-2141) Note: Registration of assignment of mortgage is not
required
2. insolvency shall be governed by the to the free property which the debtor may have,
Insolvency Law (Act No. 1956, as amended) for the payment of other credits.
3. Exemption of conjugal property or absolute 6. those credits which do not enjoy any preference
community or property provided that: with respect to specific property, and those which
a. Partnership or community subsists enjoy preference, as to the amount not paid, shall
b. Obligations of the insolvent spouse be satisfied according to the following rules:
have not redounded to the benefit of • order established by Art 2244
the family • common credits referred to in Art 2245 shall
4. if there is co-ownership, and one of the co- be paid pro rata regardless of dates.
owners is the insolvent debtor, his undivided
share or interest in the property shall be
possessed by the assignee in insolvency INSOLVENCY LAW
proceedings because it is part of his assets INSOLVENCY – state of a person whose liabilities
5. property held by the insolvent debtor as a are more than his assets. It is the inability of a person
trustee of an express or implied trust, shall to pay his debys as they become due in the ordinary
be excluded from the insolvency proceedings course of business.
CLASSIFICATION OF CREDITS BALANCE SHEET TEST – relative condition of a
1. special preferred credits (Arts 2241 and 2242 man’s assets and liabilities that the former if all made
of NCC) immediately available, would not be sufficient to
a. considered as mortgages or pledges of real discharge the latter.
or personal property or liens within the
purview of legal provisions governing EQUITY TEST – a person may be insolvent although
insolvency he may be able to pay his debts at some future time
b. taxes due to the State shall first be on a settlement and winding up of his affairs.
satisfied
2. ordinary preferred credits (Art 2244) -
preferred in the order given by law INSOLVENCY vs. BANKRUPTCY
3. common credits (Art 2245) - credits of any The only distinction between insolvency and
other kind or class, or by any other right or title bankruptcy is a matter of terminology and the source
not comprised in Arts 2241-2244 shall enjoy of the laws relating thereto.
no preference
Either a bankruptcy or insolvency statute may
ORDER OF PREFERENCE OF CREDIT operate to discharge a debt as well as release the
1. credits which enjoy preference with respect to debtor from imprisonment, and either may operate on
specific movables, exclude all others to the the petition of the debtor or that of his creditors.
extent of the value of the personal property to
which the preference refers. INSOLVENCY PRIMARILY GOVERNED BY THE CC
2. if there are 2 or more credits with respect to the Insolvency shall be governed by special laws insofar
same specific movable property, they shall be as they are not inconsistent with the CC. Insolvency
satisfied pro rata, after the payment of duties, is thus primarily governed by the CC and subsidiarily
taxes and fees due the State or any subdivision by the Insolvency Law.
thereof
3. those credits which enjoy preference in relation to The Insolvency Law is intended to cover the entire
specific real property or real rights, exclude all subject of insolvency and bankruptcy and must be
others to the extent of the value of the immovable
QuickTime™ and a
treated as a complete body of law upon the subject.
or real right to which the preference
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
refers.
4. if there are 2 or more credits with respect to the PURPOSES OF INSOLVENCY LAW:
same specific real property or real rights, they 1. To effect an equitable distribution of the
shall be satisfied pro rata, after the payment of bankrupt’s property among his creditors; and
the taxes and assessment of the taxes and 2. To benefit the debtor in discharging him from
assessments upon the immovable property or his liabilities and enabling him to start afresh
real right. with the property set apart to him as exempt.
5. the excess, if any, after the payment of the 3. The regulatory and unifying influence of the
credits which enjoy preference with respect to law on credit transactions and business
specific property, real or personal, shall be added usage throughout the country.
to whom the chattel is mortgaged, it follows that the of every sheriff all the property and money
assignee’s consent is necessary in order to bind him in his possession belonging to the debtor.
of the alienation of the mortgaged thing by the 4. To sell, upon order of the court, any estate of
debtor-mortgagor This is tantamount to a novation. the debtor which has come into his
possession;
BOND OF THE ASSIGNEE 5. To redeem all mortgages and pledges and
After his election, the assignee is required to give a to satisfy any judgment which may be an
bond for the faithful performance of his duties. encumbrance on any property sold by him.
6. To settle all accounts between the debtor
Purpose:
and his debtors subject to the approval of
1. To establish his official character
the court;
2. To establish his right to sue in that capacity
7. To compound, under the order of the court,
The bond is solely for the benefit of the creditors of
with any person indebted to such debtor;
the insolvent, and that third persons have no remedy
8. To recover any property fraudulently
against the sureties if the assignee, purporting to be
conveyed by the debtor.
as such, wrongfully takes property from such third
persons and converts it to his own use.
CREDITOR’S LIABILITY FOR FRAUDULENTLY
ASSIGNING HIS CREDIT
PROPERTIES OF INSOLVENT THAT PASS TO
A creditor’s transfer or assignment of his credit to
THE ASSIGNEE: (AFRU)
another without the knowledge and at the back of
1. All real and personal property, estate, and
other creditors of the insolvent may be a shrews
effects of the debtor, including all deeds,
surprise move that enables the transferor creditor to
books, and papers in relation thereto;
collect almost if not the entire amount of the said
2. Properties fraudulently conveyed;
creditor.
3. Right of action for damages to real property
4. The undivided share or interest of the
REMEDY OF THE ASSIGNEE: Section 37 of the
insolvent debtor in property held under co-
Insolvency Law: The creditor coming within this
ownership
purview is liable to an action by the assignee for
double the value of the property so embezzled or
PROPERTIES OF INSOLVENT THAT DO NOT
disposed of, to be received for the benefit of the
PASS TO THE ASSIGNEE; (ET-CMANT)
insolvent’s estate.
1. Property exempt from execution;
Section 37 constitutes a sort of penal clause
2. Property held in trust;
which shall be strictly construed.
3. Property of the conjugal partnership or
absolute community except insofar as the
When Sec. 37 does not apply: Not applicable where
debtor’s obligations redounded to the benefit
what has been disposed of is the creditor’s own credit
of the family.
and not the insolvent’s property.
4. Property to which a mortgage or pledge
exists unless the creditor surrenders his
DIVIDENDS IN INSOLVENCY
security or lien.
5. After-acquired property except fruits and
DIVIDENDS IN INSOLVENCY – parcel if the fund
income of property owned by the debtor
arising from the assets of the estate, rightfully allotted
6. Non-leviable assets like life insurance policy
to a creditor entitled to share in the fund, whether in
which do not have any cash surrender value
the same proportion with other creditors or in a
7. Right of action for tort which is purely
different proportion. It is paid by the assignee only
personal in nature.
QuickTime™ and a
upon order of the court.
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CLASSIFICATION AND PREFERENCE OF
POWERS OF THE ASSIGNEE
CREDITORS
1. To sue and recover all the estate, debts,
and claims belonging to or due to the debtor; PREFERENCE – an exception to the general rule. By
2. To take into his possession all the estate it, one person is given a superior right or claim over
of the debtor except property exempt from another. Hence, the law on preferences is strictly
execution; construed. (The general rule is that the purpose of
3. In case of non-resident or absconding or insolvency proceeding is the equitable distribution of
concealed debtor, to demand and receive the insolvent’s assets among the debtor’s creditors.)
1. The offer of the terms of composition must be 3. Knowledge thereof has come to the petitioner
made after the filing in court of the schedule after the confirmation of such composition.
of property and submission of his list of
creditors;
DISCHARGE - The formal and judicial release of an
2. The offer must be accepted in writing by a
insolvent debtor from his debts with the exception of
majority of the creditors representing a
those expressly reserved by law.
majority of the claims which have been
allowed;
3. It must be made after depositing in such
place designated by the court, the WHEN AN INSOLVENT DEBTOR MAY APPLY
consideration to be paid and the costs of the FOR A DISCHARGE
proceedings; and GR: A debtor may apply to the RTC for a discharge
4. The terms of the composition must be at three months to one year after the adjudication of
approved or confirmed by the court. insolvency.
Exception: The property of the insolvent has not
WHEN COURT MAY CONFIRM A COMPOSITION been converted into money without his fault, thereby
1. If it is in the best interest of the creditors; delaying the distribution of dividends among the
2. The debtor has not been guilty of any of the creditors in which case the court may extend the
period.
acts, or of a failure to perform any of the
duties which would create a bar to his
discharge; and
3. The offer and its acceptance are in good faith DEBTS RELEASED BY A DISCHARGE
and have not been made or procured in a 1. All claims, debts, and liabilities, and demands
manner forbidden by the Act. set forth in the schedule; and
2. All claims, debts, liabilities and demands
EFFECTS OF CONFIRMATION OF COMPOSITION which were or might have been proved
against the estate in insolvency
1. The consideration shall be distributed as the
judge shall direct;
2. The insolvency proceedings shall be DEBTS NOT RELEASED BY DISCHARGE (TED-
dismissed; LICS-REST-SEC)
3. The title to the insolvent’s property shall 1. Taxes or assessments due the Government;
revest in him; and 2. Any debt created by the fraud or
4. The insolvent shall be released from his embezzlement of the debtor;
debts. 3. Any debt created by the defalcation of the
5. The substitution, in a certain sense, debtor as a public officer or while acting in a
composition for the insolvency proceedings. fiduciary capacity;
6. A lawful composition and its performance by 4. Debt of any person liable for the same debt,
the insolvent has the same effect of a written for or with the insolvent debtor, either as a
discharge, although no written discharge is partner, joint contractor, indorser, surety or
granted. otherwise;
7. For all legal and practical purposes, the 5. Debts of a corporation (Reason: Corporation
insolvency ended on the date of the is not granted a discharge)
confirmation of composition and the firm was 6. Claim for support (Reason: It will make the
restored to its status quo.andIta reacquired its
QuickTime™ law a means of avoiding the enforcement of
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
personality. Its areproperties ceased to be in
needed to see this picture. the obligation)
custodia legis. 7. Discharged debt but revived by a subsequent
new promise to pay (Reason: Discharge
WHEN CONFIRMATION MAY BE SET ASIDE does not end the moral obligation to pay)
8. Debts which have not been duly scheduled in
1. Any time within six months after the time for proof and allowance.
composition has been confirmed; Exception: The creditors had notice or
2. Fraud was practiced in procuring such actual knowledge of the insolvency
composition; proceedings
evade the provisions of the 1. Death after the order of adjudication – the
Insolvency Law. proceedings shall be continued and
*Date of registration of sale of real property should concluded in like manner and with like
determine whether the sale was prohibited by the validity and effects as if he had lived.
Insolvency Law or not. 2. Death before the order of adjudication –
the proceedings shall be discontinued.
WHEN PRESUMPTION OF FRAUD EXISTS
Remedy: File claims in the proper testate or
1. If such payment, pledge, mortgage, intestate proceedings
conveyance, sale, assignment or transfer is
not made in the usual and ordinary course of
business of the debtor; or WHEN RECEIVER MAY BE APPOINTED
2. If such seizure is made under a judgment
Anytime before the election of an assignee, when it
which the debtor has confessed or offered to
appears by the verified petition of a creditor:
allow, that fact shall be prima facie evidence
of fraud. 1. That the assets of the insolvent or a
considerable portion thereof have been
pledged, mortgaged, transferred, assigned,
EQUAL EXCHANGE NOT A PREFERENCE
conveyed, or seized on legal process in
An exchange of securities within the thirty-day period violation of Sec. 70;
is not a fraudulent preference under the law, even 2. That it is necessary to commence an action
when both parties know that the debtor is insolvent, to recover the same;
if:
1. The security given up is a valid one at the The receiver shall deliver all the property, assets, or
time the exchange; effects remaining in his hands to the assignee who
2. Of equal value with the one received in shall be substituted for him in all pending actions or
exchange. proceedings.
Reason: Exchange takes nothing away from the
other creditor
WHEN PETITION MAY BE DISMISSED
Equal value: Not necessary that their value should
be mathematically equal, but it is sufficient if they are At anytime before the appointment of an assignee:
substantially equal.
1. Voluntary petition – upon the application of
the debtor, if no creditor files written
objections;
WHEN FRAUDULENT TRANSFER EXISTS
2. Involuntary petition –
1. Any payment, pledge, mortgage, a. Upon the application of the
conveyance, sale, assignment, or transfer of petitioning creditors; or
property of whatever character; b. By written consent of all creditors
2. Made by the insolvent; filed in court, in which case, the
3. Within one month before the filing of the proceedings may be dismissed at
petition in insolvency against him any time.
Exception: Transfer for a valuable pecuniary After the appointment of an assignee, dismissal is not
consideration in good faith allowed without the consent of all parties interested in
or affected thereby.
Effect of fraudulent transfer: Such transfer is VOID
QuickTime™ and a WHEN APPEAL MAY BE TAKEN TO THE
RIGHT OF ASSIGNEE TO RECOVER
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorPROPERTY
are needed to see this picture. SUPREME COURT
OR ITS VALUE
From an order granting or refusing:
The creditors of the insolvent are not authorized to
institute an independent action. In all actions or 1. An adjudication in insolvency and in the latter
proceedings to set aside or nullify fraudulent case, from the order fixing the amount of
preferences or transactions as VOID, the assignee costs, expenses, damages, and attorney’s
appears for, and represents the general creditors. fees allowed the debtor;
2. A creditor’s claim when the amount in dispute
exceeds P300.00
EFFECT OF DEATH OF INSOLVENT DEBTOR
3. A claim for property not belonging to the it was held that the said stipulation is null and void for
insolvent, presented under Sec. 48 (equitable being contrary to public policy. Prompt notice by the
claims) cardholder to the credit card company of the loss or
4. Settling an account of an assignee; theft of his card should be enough to relieve the
5. Setting apart homestead or other property former of any liability occasioned by the unauthorized
claimed as exempt from execution. use of his stolen card.
6. A discharge to the debtor. Under the said stipulation, Acol could have
theoretically done everything in his power to give
2006 JURISPRUDENCE ON SECURITY TRANSACTIONS respondent the required written notice, but if the bank
took its time to include the card in its Cancellation
Acol v. Philippine Commercial Credit Card Bulletin, it could still hold Acol liable for whatever
Incorporated, GR No. 135149 (25 July 2006): unauthorized transaction incurred during such
[1] Contracts of Adhesion, [2] Obligations and intervening period. This is iniquitous and against
Contracts on Provisions Against Public Policy. public policy under Art. 1306 of the Civil Code. The
court then, strikes down the said provision.
FACTS:
Acol procured from respondent a bankard
credit card and an extension, which he used for
several years. One day, he discovered that it was
missing, and so, on the following day, he called up Citibank v. Spouses Cabamongan and Sons, GR
the card company and made a report; the No. 146918 (02 May 2006):
representative spoke to him and told him that his card [1] Simple Loan, [2] Interest Rates, and [3]
would be included in the circular of lost cards. Oblicon Concept of Diligence; Diligence Required
He called again the day thereafter inquiring on Banks
as to what else he must do in connection with the
loss. The representative told him that he should put FACTS:
the report in writing and submit it, together with his The spouses Cabamongan [hereinafter
wife’s and daughter’s extension cards. He then Spouses] opened a foreign currency time deposit
promptly sent the said letter which the company with Citibank, in the amount of $55,216.69 for a term
received 2 days thereafter. Unfortunately, someone of 182 days. Prior to the maturity of the said deposit,
had already used his credit card (with purchases a person claiming to be Carmelita Cabamongan [the
amounting to P76,067.28 ) on the date that he called wife] pre-terminated the said deposit. Said person
in the loss and the day thereafter. Acol said that he presented a Bank of America Versatele Card, and
would not pay for accounts incurred after the date he ATM Card, and a Mabuhay Credit Card. She filled up
reported the loss, and after investigation and review, the required documents for pre-termination [from
the bank, through its EVP and GM, that it was not which a discrepancy in signatures was apparent],
Acol who used his card during the dates in question. with the assistance of the bank’s Acct. Officer, who
Nonetheless, the bank still decided to collect the said also interviewed her casually during the said
amounts within 15 days from notice, citing the Terms transaction. She failed to bring the original certificate
and Conditions Governing the Issuance of a Bankard, of deposit, so the bank had her execute a release
provision no. 1 [which basically says that the holder and waiver document in favor of Citibank; the said
of the card will still be liable in case of loss, until a document was not notarized on the same day, but
written notice of the loss is given to the bank and nevertheless, the money was given to the person
such loss be included in the Cancellation Bulletin]. withdrawing, with the transaction lasting onlu for 40
The bank then filed for collection with the RTC. The minutes.
RTC ruled in favor of Acol; the and
QuickTime™ CAa reversed the The person withdrawing left an ID with the
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
same. are needed to see this picture. bank, prompting the said bank to call Carmelita at her
listed address. The wife of the Spouses’ son received
ISSUE: the call and was surprised to hear that Carmelita pre-
Whether provision no. 1 in the Terms and terminated the deposit because the Spouses were
Conditions is binding on Acol, considering that the then in the US. She immediately called them and
contract was one of adhesion. informed them of what happened. Previously,
someone broke into the Spouses’ home in the US,
HELD: where they reported that only a jewelry box went
Not binding. In Ermitaňo v. CA, where a missing; after the phone call, they discovered that
provision identical to the one at hand was contested,
their passports and bank deposit certificates were 12%, regardless if it falls within [1] or [2] from such
also gone. finality until satisfaction, with this interim period being
Carmelita called Citibank to report the considered a forbearance of money.
incident, but the bank relented to refund the said
amount taken for the reason that the said deposit In a loan of forbearance of money, the
was pre-terminated and released to one “Carmelita” interest due should be that stipulated in writing, and
after proper identification. A case was filed by the in the absence thereof, a rate of 12% / annum
Spouses in the RTC, which ruled in their favor. The counted from the time of demand.
CA affirmed the finding of the CA that the Bank was Thus, the rate of 2.564% shall apply for the
negligent, hence this appeal. contract period of the deposit [182 days], and the rate
of 12% shall apply from the demand. In the
ISSUES: intervening period [after 182 but before demand], the
1. Whether the decision of the RTC and the CA, interest chargeable shall be interest rate granted by
finding respondent bank negligent, is correct. Citibank, since the time deposit provided for roll over
2. What is the correct interest rate to be charged? upon the maturity of the principal and interest.
HELD: Damages
Moral damages are also owed under Art.
Negligence 2220 of the Civil Code, because of the gross
The Court agrees with the observation of the negligence of the bank’s officer amounting to bad
CA that Citibank, through the Acct. Officer was faith.
negligent; even with discrepancies in the pictures and
signatures, and the failure to surrender the original of
the certificate of time deposit, the pre-termination was
allowed. Even the waiver document was not
notarized; a procedure meant to protect the bank.
Since banking institutions are impressed with
public interest, the highest degree of diligence is
expected; by nature of its functions, banks are under
the obligation to treat the accounts of its depositors
with meticulous care, always having in mind the
fiduciary nature of their relationship. Citibank is liable
for damages.
Interests Chargeable
The time Article 1980 provides that a contract
between a bank and a depositor shall be governed by
the provisions on simple loans. Thus, the said time
deposit constitutes a simple loan for which, the
interest rate on the actual damages of $55,216.69
should be in accordance with the guidelines set in
Eastern Shipping Lines v. CA:
[1] Obligation breached is a loan or
forbearance of money : (a) stipulated interest, or (b)
12% from time of demand, if no interest is stated.
[2] If the obligation is not a loan or a
QuickTime™ and a
forbearance of money, TIFF an interest
(Uncompressed) on the amount of
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
damages may be imposed at the discretion of the
court at the rate of 6%. No rate on uniquidated claims
until demand can be established with reasonable
certainty. If demand is certain, it shall run from that
time, if not, from the time of judgment; interest shall
be based on the amount finally adjudged in any case.