Progress Report
Progress Report
During the period of December 2013 to June 2014, the time is spent on learning PSO and
its implementation in A! s"stem# $irstl", a simple e%ample consisting of a transfer function
model of an imaginar" plant is tried# &ain program for PSO to control the P'D parameters of
e%ample plant is (ritten in &A)*A+ and Simulin, model are runs through -sim. command#
Once the results are satisfactor", the simulation is continued to control P' controller emplo"ed to
a single area s"stem (hich actuall" controlled through integral controller# After se/eral runs of
the simulation through PSO algorithm, it is noted that result is impro/ed (hen compared to
actual result of the e%ample# So, se/eral attempts are made b" ad0usting the (eighting parameters
of PSO and changing OD1 sol/er# +" selecting suitable (eighting parameters, range of input
and correct OD1 sol/er, the simulation (or,s fine and results are great#
Secondl", the simulation (as carried out (ith an e%ample problem of t(o area s"stem#
During the simulation, here also dra(bac,s of fine results are (itnessed# )o o/ercome that,
instead of using P' controller, P'D controller is used and a fi%ed point sol/er is chosen#
$inall", the stud" is further increased to lo2i map3based chaotic algorithm to sol/e t(o
area s"stem# )he result sho(s that the rise time and settling time is much lesser using PSO
algorithm compared to lo2i map3based chaotic algorithm#
RESEARCH SCHOLAR SUPERVISIOR