Evaluating alternate distribution models of energy products for rural
Base of Pyramid in India Sachin Shukla Sreyamsa Bairiganjan Published by Centre for Development Finance, Insttute for Financial and Management Research IITM Research Park Phase 1, 10th Floor #1, Kanagam Road Taramani Chennai 600113 India www.ifmr.ac.in/cdf Copyright Sachin Shukla, 2011 The moral right of the author(s) has been asserted All rights reserved Without limitng the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publicaton may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmited, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior writen permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this paper ISBN 978-81-920986-0-9 Preface In recent years, we have been riveted as rural India has begun to fercely negotate its rightul place in the world. Analysts predict that by 2020, for the frst tme in history, the number of deprived households in rural India will be less than aspirers and seekers. This is just the efect. The cause of this massive transformaton lies in a rise in discretonary incomes from increasing productvity and integraton of rural markets. While the number of rural Indian consumers earning a dollar a day would fall from 400 million to 250 million by 2020, consumers earning over fve dollars a day would increase from 50 million to 150 million. The economic and social shifs underway will have far-reaching efects for companies large and small, policymakers and all stakeholders in rural Indias wellbeing. In parallel with Indias rapid economic growth, Indian rural consumpton has grown remarkably. While this is expected to contnue, the dynamics of this rural consumpton is expected to change drastcally. Today, the average rural Indian household spends about 75% of its annual income on food, beverages and tobacco, 12% on energy needs, and merely 2-3% on housing and health. In the near future, rural populatons, supported by development policies like NREGA, farm loan waivers and enhanced rural infrastructure, are likely to spend proportonally much more on discretonary items and new product categories like healthcare, educaton, transportaton and personal care. Success in encouraging growth of rural Indian markets will depend extensively on contnuous innovaton in alternate product distributon channels. Rural markets are ready for large scale interventons. However, intent and ingenuity in these markets will count as much as executon. Only those who can create win-win possibilites in this market will get a shot at the fortune lying in millions of Indias poorest households. The compelling case of rural markets has lured large corporatons and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) alike. Indias largest Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), consumer durable and automobile companies are already clocking 20-40% of their annual revenues from rural markets, beatng the growth rate estmates of their urban counterparts year on year. The trend is spreading rapidly across product categories. But limited investment appette in rural markets has forced SMEs to be right the frst tme or crash out. Some SMEs have found local success, but have not achieved the desired scale, inspite of contnued demand-supply gaps. Since the proftability argument in servicing these markets is based on the low margin-high volume equaton, scale is imperatve to achieve the desired botom-line impact. SMEs today are adoptng unique mix-n- match distributon strategies, exploitng the strengths of local players and creatng hybrid value chains to reach as many end users as possible. Indian government too has picked up the cue and they are ready to act where the private sector has lagged. With less than 45% of Indian populaton having access to basic banking services, a planning commission commitee on fnancial inclusion has proposed rural ATMs at Post Ofces. This convergence of a wide distributon outreach of 1.55 lakh post ofce branches with the governments fnancial inclusion agenda could bring a signifcant rural populaton into the formal banking domain. Game-changing initatves, like Aadhar-Unique Identfcaton, are expected to accelerate the inclusion mandate, while cornering implementaton issues, such as pilferage in public distributon system, and make any prosperity stck at the ground level. Such measures from the government stmulate the rural economy and create favourable incentves for organised players to partcipate in rural India. Against this encouraging backdrop, this paper analyzes product distributon choices available in rural BoP markets and helps enterprises evaluate the key drivers of distributon for successful go- to-market strategies. It is based on extensive feld work with commercial and social enterprises, rural BoP consumers and rigorous secondary research. The paper highlights the complexites of operatng in rural Indian markets. To this end, it presents a new analytcal framework to help companies identfy viable alternate distributon channels and evaluate their capabilites. We hope that this paper will help manufacturers, producers and marketers partcularly in India to beter realise the enormous potental of the underlying structures in this market and engage them in a mutually benefcial way. We believe that integrated rural markets hold the key for inclusive growth in a scalable and sustainable way. Favourable natonal policies, targeted capital investments and efcient business models would further realise the enormous potental of this market. Sachin Shukla Sreyamsa Bairiganjan CDF-IFMR CDF-IFMR Acknowledgement The authors acknowledge the valuable comments and inputs from colleagues at the Centre for Development Finance (CDF) (a) Dr. Jessica Seddon Wallack, Ex-Director (b) Mr. David Fuente, Ex-Programme Head, Infrastructure and Governance (c) Mr. Navneet Narula, Programme Head, Strategy Advisory Group (d) Mr. Santosh Singh, Programme Head, Rural Market Insight. The authors extend a special thanks to the research team at the Centre for Development Finance comprising of Bree Bacon, Joanne Sprague, Elizabeth Mathew and Anand Shankar. The authors also wish to acknowledge the generous support of the ICICI Foundaton for Inclusive Growth who funded this research. The views expressed in this note are entrely those of the authors and should not be atributed to the insttutons with which they are associated. PHOTO CREDITS: Sreyamsa Bairiganjan, Selvan Thandapani With funding support from: ICICI Foundaton ICICI Foundaton for Inclusive Growth (ICICI Foundaton) was founded by the ICICI Group in early 2008 to give focus to its eforts to promote inclusive growth amongst low-income Indian households. It is commited to making Indias economic growth more inclusive, allowing every individual to partcipate in and beneft from the growth process. The ICICI foundaton does this by supportng strong independent organizatons which work towards empowering the poor to partcipate in and beneft from the Indian growth process. Terminology & Assumptons Rural India Natonal Sample Survey Organizaton (NSSO) a defnes rural India as areas with (i) populaton density of less than 400 per sq. km. (ii) 75 percent of the male working populaton engaged in agriculture and (iii) no Municipal Corporaton or Board. Other government agencies, such as Insurance Regulatory and Development Agency (IRDA) and Natonal Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), defne rural as villages with populatons of less than 5000 and 75 percent of the male populaton engaged in agriculture. Base of the Pyramid (BoP) Here the rural Indian BoP market is defned as households in the botom four expenditure quintles (based on data from the Natonal Sample Survey Organizaton, India) that spend less than Rs. 3,453 Indian rupees (US$75) on goods and services per month. This defniton represents a market of 114 million households, or 76 percent of the total rural populaton. b Village Level Entrepreneur (VLE) c A VLE is ofen identfed as a person who conducts business in a designated village/local area to increase the reach and penetraton of a certain set of products and services. VLEs generate leads and make sales using their own social networks. Typically, VLEs earn commission on every sale. A VLEs role is important for sales, product promoton, product selecton, feld-testng and trials. VLEs can act as important communicaton touch points between producers/organized distributors and potental customers. Energy products In the context of this report, energy products are durable or hard goods, which address the lightng or cooking needs of the consumers and yield service or utlity over tme. Examples of such products include cook stoves and solar lanterns. a Government of India. (2002). Natonal Sample Survey Organizaton. Available: www.mospi.gov.in. Last accessed 20 July 2010. b CDF-IFMR analysis, Natonal Sample Survey Organizaton (NSSO) 2004/2005, round 61. c Villgro. (2009). Village Level Entrepreneur. Available: htp://www.villgro.org/index.php?opton=com_content& view=artcle&id=26&Itemid=35. Last accessed 25 August 2010. Contents 1. Introducton 1 2. The Rural BoP Distributon Challenge 2 2.1 Rural BoP customer profle 3 2.2 Product Challenges 5 2.3 Operatng Environment 6 3. Defning Rural BoP Distributon 8 4. Mapping requirements for Rural BoP Distributon Channels across Product Classifcatons 12 4.1 Distributon requirements of energy products for Rural BoP 14 5. Case Studies Energy Products for the Rural BoP 17 5.1 First Energy Oorja 18 5.2 TIDE 21 5.3 Prakt Design 25 5.4 ENVIROFIT 27 5.5 d.light India 30 6. Generalized Models 33 6.1 Proprietary Distributon 33 6.2 Non-Governmental Organizatons (NGOs) 35 6.3 Cooperatves 37 6.4 Self Help Groups (SHGs) 39 6.5 Microfnance Insttutons (MFI) 42 6.6 Rural Retail 45 7. Conclusion 48 References 50 About the authors 51 List of fgures Figure 1 : Rural BoP Market Complexity Contributng Factors 3 Figure 2 : Indian Rural BoP expenditure by Sector 4 Figure 3 : First Energy Oorja Models 19 Figure 4 : TIDE Models 23 Figure 5 : Prakt Design Models 26 Figure 6 : Enviroft Models 28 Figure 7 : d.light model 31 Figure 8 : Proprietary Model and Variants 34 Figure 9 : NGO Model and Variant 36 Figure 10 : Co-op Model and Variant 38 Figure 11 : SHG Model and Variant 40 Figure 12 : MFI Model and Variant 43 Figure 13 : MFI Variants 43 Figure 14 : Rural Retail Model and Variant 46 List of Tables Table 1 : Distributon Capability Gradient 12 Table 2 : Distributon requirements across product classifcatons 13 Table 3 : Distributon Scenarios/Requirements of BoP energy products 15 Table 4 : Existng distributon approaches used by some BoP energy product companies 17 Table 5 : TIDE Product details 21 Table 6 : Comparing critcal requirements of Energy products for the rural BoP and channel capabilites. 48 1 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 1. Introduction With an approximate populaton segment of 700 million people, Indias rural Base of the Pyramid (BoP) market presents itself as a signifcant opportunity not only for multnatonal corporatons but also for small and medium manufacturers and producers. Analysts predict the revenue opportunity in this market to be growing almost at pace with urban markets. 1 While numerous experiments have been conducted in pursuit of frst mover advantage in Indian rural BoP markets, in reality, the success in this segment to date has remained elusive. So far, atempts to exploit opportunity in BoP markets have emphasized on product and process improvements. Success stories of increasing market penetraton by certain fast moving consumer goods (FMCGs) with modifed packaging, such as shampoo sachets, are encouraging but ofer limited insights that can be put to use in other product classes. The quest for innovaton in distributon channels has just begun. Distributon networks in emerging markets tend to be unique and disjointed; Indian rural markets are no excepton. 2 As C. K. Prahalad categorically highlights in The Fortune at the Botom of the Pyramid, Distributon systems that reach the BoP are critcal for developing this market. Innovatons in distributon are as critcal as products and process innovatons. It is critcal for any multnatonal corporaton or small-to-medium enterprise considering entry into Indias rural market to understand both the characteristcs of the prevailing distributon systems and how the distributon systems would evolve 3 . The corporaton or enterprise must also assess whether accurate and tmely product distributon can be achieved without frst investng in its distributon networks. For multnatonal corporatons and small-to-medium enterprises alike, this paper analyzes the product distributon choices available in rural BoP markets and evaluates the key drivers of distributon for a successful go-to-market strategy. It presents the case for identfying products unique distributon requirements and for working with distributon channels that have matching capabilites, using the example of energy products in rural Indian BoP markets. Secton 2 describes how the distributon challenge makes rural BoP markets seem unatractve to producers/ manufacturers. Secton 3 puts forth a new analytcal framework for evaluatng rural BoP distributon channels and their capabilites. It highlights typical marketng scenarios in which these distributon capabilites are essental. Secton 4 applies the distributon capabilites framework to several 1 McKinsey Global Insttute. (2005). Income Classes - Income Pyramids - Urban / Rural breakdown. Available: htp:// www2.mckinsey.com/mgi/publicatons/india_consumer_market/images/India_Interactve1.swf. Last accessed 25 August 2010. 2 Dawar, N. & Chatopadhyay, A. (2002). Rethinking marketng programs for emerging markets. Long Range Planning, 35, 457. 3 Parhalad, C.K., Lieberthal, K. (2003). The end of corporate imperialism. Boston: Harvard Business School. 2 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge product classifcatons. It then also focuses specifcally on the distributon requirements of rural- targeted BoP consumer energy products. Secton 5 is a case study analysis of fve rural-targeted consumer energy products, specifcally solar lights and improved cook stoves, based upon the distributon capabilites framework established in Secton 4. In Secton 6, six generalized alternate distributon models for energy products are presented and evaluated based on the framework. In conclusion, Secton 7 summarizes the distributon capabilites framework, presents key strengths of alternate distributon models for energy products and draws lessons applicable for successfully distributng all products/services classes to Indias rural BoP markets. 2. The Rural BoP Distribution Challenge The BoP populaton is characterized by unmet basic needs (access to basic healthcare, water and sanitaton, fnancial services, educaton, etc.) and a so-called BoP-penalty 4 that results in higher prices for BoP customers than their wealthier counterparts for basic products and services. The BoP-penalty is primarily an outcome of local monopolies, inadequate access, poor distributon and strong traditonal intermediaries. 5 BoP markets are ofen rural, especially in emerging countries like India, are poorly served, dominated by local informal economies and consequently relatvely uncompettve and inefcient. They starkly contrast wealthier mid-market populaton segments that are largely urban, relatvely well-served and extremely compettve. On close observaton, rural BoP markets are demanding and complex for producers/manufacturers because of multple challenges that broadly fall into three categories: a. Rural BoP Customer Profle b. Product Challenges c. Operatng Environment (Eco-system) 4 Allen L. Hammond, Robert S. Katz, William J. Kramer, Julia T. Tran, Courtland Walker (2008). The Next 4 Billion - Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington D.C.: World Resource Insttute and Internatonal Finance Corporaton. 5 Prahalad, C.K., 2004. The Fortune at the Botom of the Pyramid. 1st ed. San Francisco: Wharton School Publishing. 3 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Figure 1: Rural BoP Market Complexity Contributng Factors 2.1 Rural BoP customer profile Rural BoP populatons are not a homogenous group. Living in all kinds of setlements, they have varied income and expenditure levels. BoP customers unique demands mean that product or service solutons are neither interchangeable nor readily transferable even within the segment. In spite of their diverse needs that vary across regions, BoP populatons share several commonalites in their fnancial hardships, domestc constraints, difcult living conditons, lack of basic informaton for making informed decisions and informal quality standards, amongst others, such as: Income levels and volatility: Income levels of rural BoP are low in both per capita income and disposable income. Household earnings compulsorily go first towards fulfilling survival needs and investments required to assure health in the next round of the economic cycle. This underlies the need for conservative cash flow management and a low risk appetite for unproven offerings. The seasonal nature of income necessitates credit services that match cash outflows to cash inflows for discretionary products. Purchase of essential products, such as medicines or other emergency necessities, is less reliant on credit availability. BoP Market Complexity Rural BoP Customer Profle Income Levels & Volatlity Savings Patern Language & Literacy Mobility & Travel Paterns Customer Preferences Product Challenges Push vs. Pull products Unavailable Complementary Products & Services Need vs. Latent Need Product Diusion Curves Limited Product Acquisiton Models Logistcs Dependence Operating Environment Government Interventons & Policy Support Infrastructure Constraints Geographical Challenges Populaton Densites Non-homogenous Stakeholders Scarcity of Data Sets 4 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Savings pattern: There is a lack of ready access to financial institutions and services, which could facilitate movement of resources across time and help arrest the economic risks felt by rural BoP households. BoP households continue to have minimal savings (beyond major life cycle events, such as education and marriage), retain illiquid assets (such as land, gold and animals), and have less capability to handle economic shocks. Language and literacy: Variation in languages across regions and low literacy levels inhibit the creation of standard, cost-effective marketing and communication materials, such as well- designed publications, signage, advertisements and brochures. The lack of consistent and effective marketing contributes to information asymmetry and long gestation periods for new product introductions. Mobility and travel patterns: Restricted mobility and limited travel patterns of rural BoP end customers lead to slow dissemination of knowledge, resistance to change, and little benefit from existing customer experiences from outside their local communities. Customer Preferences: Rural BoP end customers demand a high degree of customization before changing consumption patterns, due to deep cultural beliefs and preconceived notions or experiences with prior purchase decisions. This lowers the attractiveness of the rural BoP segment for commercial players looking to cross-sell products and services from urban centers. For Indias rural BoP market segment as a whole, the current expenditure across product portfolios is highly concentrated in portfolios that correspond with immediate survival needs, overwhelmingly food (refer to Figure 2). There is a large (66 percent) gap between segment expenditure on food and the next largest expenditure, on energy needs, which accounts for roughly 12 percent of the Indian rural BoP annual expenditure. Figure 2: Indian Rural BoP expenditure by Sector Food 78% Housing 2% Water ~0% Energy 12% Household Goods 2% Health 3% Transportaton 2% ICT 1% Educaton ~0% Other ~0% Rural BoP Expenditure by Sector (Million $'s adjusted by 2005 PPP) Source : The next 4 Billion - Market Size & Business Strategy at the base of the pyramid-By World Resource Insttute, Internatonal Finance Corporaton, IFMR-CDF Analysis 5 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 2.2 Product Challenges Product-related challenges for rural BoP end customers need innovatons on products as well as business models. Manufacturers and producers of rural BoP products face many pressures to reinvent their oferings, supply chain arrangements, marketng and communicaton techniques, along with ownership models through which customers can access their products, such as: Push vs. Pull products 6 : Pull products, such as consumption products and income- and lifestyle- improving products with recognized brands, need little demand stimulation. A lack of rural- targeted brands across multiple product categories, prominent institutions or mass-media communication methods excludes most products from the pull-products category, negating any cross-sell opportunity. Most luxury products and new, improved products with marginal enhancements are typically considered push-products that require enormous effort to communicate added benefits and scale demand. Unavailable complementary products and services: Lack of available complementary products and services skews purchase choice towards a product that is part of well-functioning and complete product suite, even if that purchase inadequately serves BoP customers unique demands. For example, although kerosene lamps are costly, less efficient and pose health and environmental hazards, they are still a preferred choice over incandescent lamps due to the easier availability of kerosene fuel as compared to electricity in rural areas. Need vs. Latent need: Historical purchase decisions, product associations and conventional wisdom, along with long running market inefficiencies, have lead rural BoP consumers to deny or not recognize their latent needs and to pursue a fulfillment of only immediate, tangible needs. For example, three-brick chulhas 7 are still preferred over improved cook stoves, which have well known health and economic benefits. Consequently, products that would otherwise qualify only as substitute products actually drive demand and take away most end-customer spend. 6 Push Products: In a push strategy, the producer or manufacturer promotes the product to wholesalers, the wholesalers promote it to retailers, and the retailers promote it to consumers. Thus, with products promoted via this strategy, it is the supply which creates the demand. 7 In Hindi language, the word chulha means stove, but for the low-income populaton in developing countries, a chulha or stove is an arrangement of three bricks or stones heated by an open wood- or cow dung-burning fre. Indoor air polluton from this cooking method poses serious health and environmental hazards. 6 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Typical product diffusion curves 8 in a rural BoP market: Given low levels of income and low- risk appetites, rural BoP customers avoid independent decision making for new and improved products for which there is not much social proof. 9 Opinion leaders 10 and social media 11 in rural communities play critical roles in influencing early adopters and followers. Limited product acquisition models: Only a few product acquisition models for rural BoP markets have been tested at scale, with limited success. The three most prevalent ways for rural BoP end users to acquire energy products, such as improved cook stoves and solar lanterns, are: a. A household owns the product afer an inital upfront payment; b. A household purchases the product at a fxed price, and any additonal complementary products/services are purchased on an ongoing basis from a local agent; c. The local community owns a product/service and shares the associated fxed costs, while individuals/households avail the facilites on a pay-per-use basis. Logistics dependence: Products with challenging physical distribution requirements, such as specialized transportation, complex assembly, and installation, repair and maintenance, necessitate various components to be physically transported to different sites and then assembled locally. 2.3 Operating Environment Politcal, social, economic and technological unpredictability in rural BoP markets has discouraged manufacturers and producers to actvely partcipate in the operatng environment. Variables in the operatng environment that have adversely afected the interests of rural BoP end customers include: 8 The product difusion curve models the rate of adopton of a new product in a certain region or segment. Consumers of the product can be grouped under various categories based on how quickly they adopt a new product. Five diferent product adopton groups typically used explain these curves are Innovators, Early adopters, Early majority, Late majority and Laggards. Sales and marketng plays in rural markets must be planned to infuence a desired segment considering this sequence. 9 Social proof (also referred to as informatonal social infuence), is a psychological phenomenon that occurs in ambiguous social conditons where individuals or group of individuals are unable to determine an appropriate ratonal behavior by themselves. Thus, making the assumpton that others (individually or collectvely) in similar conditons possess more knowledge and deeming their behavior as appropriate or beter informed. 10 In rural markets, the infuencing capability of opinion leaders in decision making and purchasing the product is remarkable. An opinion leader is a peer group leader in the sense that this person tends to lead the view and beliefs of a group of people in a reference group. 11 Social media are media for social interacton, using highly accessible and scalable publishing techniques. A common thread running through all defnitons of social media is a blending of technology and social interacton for the co- creaton of value. 7 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Government Interventions & Policy Support: Ill-planned, poorly executed and intermittent government schemes in certain regions have led to a wide introduction of low-quality products that shift the end customers perception away from better product choices. 12 Short-term subsidy programs have led to sparse distribution of products in certain rural areas, skewing the price point perception against a more long-term market-based solution. Infrastructure Constraints: Low penetration of civic and private infrastructure in rural markets, such as roads, water channels, electricity and telecommunications, has created barriers to entry for affordable, mainstream products. It has added to the financial burden on manufacturers and producers of product redesign, manufacturing facilities, physical distribution, and operations and maintenance that are more suited to local infrastructure availability. Lack of adequate infrastructure in rural areas has shifted producer/distributer attention away from the basic underlying needs of the end customer. Absence of modern technological interventions, mass media instruments and platforms (coupled with excessive reliance on social media and opinion leaders) contributes to the information asymmetry that prevents the growth of effective rural markets. Geographical Challenges: Extreme weather conditions, long distances (geographical spread), and hostile terrain present unique transportation and storage requirements, which require a high degree of customization both in planning and in execution of product distribution to rural BoP markets. Population Density: Sparse population density in Indias interior, compounded by geographical spread of rural villages, has prohibited commercial players from enjoying economies of scale. Non-homogenous stakeholders: Lack of homogeneity among key stakeholders in BoP market play, such as commercial players, civil society organizations, government institutions, and uncertain power centers (political, economic and social) across local communities demand sustained, local insight by distributors, manufacturers and producers. 12 For example: Natonal Programme on Improved Chulha (NPIC) started in 1983 by Govt. of India ofered subsidies of up to Rs. 450 /- (as of 2001-2002) for varied classes of chulhas. NPIC was initally implemented as a central pro- gramme with a mult-agency approach but was converted to a state programme due to the mixed response it received in the feld. 8 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 3. Defining Rural BoP Distribution A distributon channel is conventonally envisioned as a series of intermediaries, who pass the product down the chain to the next entty untl it fnally reaches the consumer or end user. Each element of the chain has its own specifc needs, stmulus, and ability to deliver in a unique operatng environment, which the producer must take into account, along with those needs of the end user. Recent innovatons in rural distributon models have expanded the role of the distributon partner. The distributer role is no longer restricted to physical distributon of products alone, but has also expanded to provision of several other inputs, which infuence a consumers purchase decision, such as credit and post-sales service. Depending upon the product, customer and operatng environment described in Secton 2, a rural BoP distributon channel must demonstrate one or more of the following nine capabilites 13 : a. Physical Distributon: Physical distributon involves the transportaton and storage of manufactured goods to make them available to the consumer. A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under physical distributon: 1) Transportaton/shipping infrastructure according to the civic infrastructure avaiable en route, such as road, fuelling statons, etc. 2) Accessible storage/warehousing for temporary storage of goods during transit 3) Inventory control at all sites to ensure uninterrupted supply to target geographies 4) Protectve packaging and materials for handling goods in the factory, warehouse, and transport terminals This capability is most relevant to scenarios involving (i) Physical products (not services) essental for delivery of the value propositon (ii) Special packaging or sortng requirements (iii) Unique storage & transportaton requirements (e.g. ice cream, vaccines). b. Promoton: Promoton involves developing and spreading persuasive communicatons about an ofer 14 for the purpose of informing or persuading a potental buyers purchasing decision, both above and below the line. 15 A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under promoton: 13 & 14 Kotler & Armstrong. (2006). The nature and importance of marketng channels. Available: htp://www. laukamm.de/fomweb/elearning/marketng/channel/kotl_channels1.htm. Last accessed 02-12-2010. 15 Above the line promotons are carried out through mass media and are tailored for a mass audience. Below the line promoton refers to forms of non-media communicaton or advertsing targeted at individuals according to their needs or preferences. 9 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 1) Capability to develop powerful messaging which is easily understood by the audience and stmulates the recipients to take acton 2) Capability to create or access communicaton vehicles, such as mass media platorms (local media), social events, etc. This capability is most relevant to scenarios involving (i) New product introducton (ii) Diferentatng a product (iii) Increasing demand for an existng product by creatng customer pull (iv) Presentng product-related informaton to customers and other stakeholders. c. Credit and Financing: Credit is a fnancial instrument to match the end customers payment ability to the products pricing requirement. A prospectve rural BoP distributon channel must demonstrate the following minimum capability under Credit: 1) Provide fnancial products and services in a manner which are accessible, convenient, fexible, contnuous and afordable This capability is most relevant to discretonary products priced in a mid-to-high range.
Financing is the acquisiton and use of funds to cover the costs of the channel. 16 A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Financing: 1) Access to alternate sources of capital for proper functoning of channel operatons 2) Ability to exploit manufacturer/producer promotonal schemes and ofers This capability is relevant to all products. d. Post-Sale Services: Post-sale services include all support services, such as provision of informaton, servicing/repair and product fulfllment, provided to the customer for ensuring smooth functoning, maximizing uptme and an extended product life cycle. A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Post-Sale Services: 1) Ability to optmize facility locaton and provide rapid product fulfllment, laying the groundwork for a post-sales program that consistently meets customer demands 2) Ability to accurately manage inventory and establish control through integrated capabilites supported by technology and operatonal processes 3) Ability to map out the longevity of a product and/or its parts to plan for maintenance and predict repair cycles 4) Ability to execute repair/fulfllment and contnuous outreach This capability is most relevant to (i) Products with relatvely high degrees of technical complexity and maintenance requirements (ii) Products requiring other complimentary (usually consumable) products for their normal functoning. 16 Kotler & Armstrong. (2006). The nature and importance of marketng channels. Available: htp://www.laukamm. de/fomweb/elearning/marketng/channel/kotl_channels1.htm. Last accessed 02-12-2010. 10 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge e. Informaton: Informaton capability is comprised of collecton and distributon of research and intelligence informaton about the marketng environment. 17 A prospectve rural BoP distributon channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Informaton: 1) Create or have easy access to primary and secondary research on populaton, usage rate, demographics, behavioral paterns, alternate product choices and lifestyle 2) Data analysis capability for meaningful insights This capability is most relevant for diferentated (non-commodity) products and services. f. Contact: Contact is the set of actvites involving fnding and communicatng the value propositon of an ofering with potental buyers. A prospectve rural BoP distributon channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Contact: 1) Regular physical outreach or branding presence with target customers in their local areas 2) Access to local intermediaries, village level entrepreneurs (VLEs) and opinion leaders with deep understanding of pathways to infuence rural individuals, households and enterprises This capability is an absolute requirement for all oferings that are not essental for immediate survival needs. g. Matching: Matching refers to the ftng and shaping of an ofering according to the needs of the customer. 18 It might include actvites, such as manufacturing, grading, assembling and packaging. A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Matching: 1) Ability to understand diferent needs of various customer segments, artculate their customizaton needs and adapt manufacturers ofering, as required 2) Access to infrastructure and supplementary products required to alter/complete the product portolio so as to best serve end customers latent needs This capability is most relevant to customizable products where alteraton (by design) of product atributes is required to suit customer requirements. 17 & 18 Kotler & Armstrong. (2006). The nature and importance of marketng channels. Available: htp://www.lau- kamm.de/fomweb/elearning/marketng/channel/kotl_channels1.htm. Last accessed 02-12-2010. 11 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge h. Negotaton: Negotaton is the act of agreeing upon a price and other terms of the ofer so that ownership or possession can be transferred. 19 A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Negotaton: 1) Access to local marketng intermediaries capable of engaging the end customer in a pricing and product informaton related dialogue 2) Knowledge of end customers product alternatves, walk-away positons and zones of possible agreement 3) Ability to communicate long-term vs. short-term tradeofs among alternate choices to the end customer This capability is most relevant to (i) Customized products (ii) Products for which price discovery mechanisms are not already established (iii) Products with relatvely medium to high price points. i. Risk Taking: Risk taking entails assuming business risks, such as the inability to sell inventory at full margin. A prospectve rural BoP channel must demonstrate these minimum capabilites under Risk Taking: 1) Ability to identfy and account for known sources of risks to business, including natural shocks, economic shocks to customers, operatonal and other market risks 2) Ability to understand product life-cycle and end customer purchasing paterns for undertaking discount decisions to clear unsold inventory This capability is most relevant to (i) Products with uncertain demand (ii) Physical products with signifcant transportaton and inventory costs (iii) Perishable products. 19 Kotler & Armstrong. (2006). The nature and importance of marketng channels. Available: htp://www.laukamm. de/fomweb/elearning/marketng/channel/kotl_channels1.htm. Last accessed 02-12-2010. 12 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 4. Mapping requirements for Rural BoP Distribution Channels across Product Classifications Rural products have distnct functonal and market characteristcs. For successful go-to-market strategies, multnatonal corporatons and small-to-medium enterprises interested in entering Indias rural BoP markets must assess these product characteristcs. They should identfy distnct distributon requirements of their products and services and a distributon model with capabilites to match those requirements. Each distributon capability can fulfll more than one sales and marketng scenario. Based on the marketng scenarios likely to be faced by their products, distributers need to frst identfy the unique product distributon requirements and then pursue distributon channels which fulfll these requirements optmally. Taking tme to complete this analysis in advance of product launch will help distributers choose the best possible distributon channel and also identfy marketng scenarios that can be successfully handled by a given channel. Any typical rural product can be categorized into one of the fve following classifcatons: (a) FMCGs (b) Consumer Durables (c) Services (d) Agricultural Inputs - Consumables (e) Agricultural Inputs - Durables. Based on the capability gradient defned in Table 1 below, each of the nine distributon capabilites set forth in Secton 3 is applied to the fve major product classes in Table 2. The same capability gradient defniton is being used throughout the paper. Legend Distributon capability gradient Capability requirement of diferent product classes Available capability of diferent distributon channels High Good distributon capability is required Good distributon capability exists Medium High Favorable distributon capability is required Favorable distributon capability exists Low Medium Unfavorable distributon capability is acceptable Unfavorable distributon capability exists Low No distributon capability is acceptable No distributon capability exists Table 1: Distributon Capability Gradient 13 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 1 3
|
P a g e S a c h i n
S h u k l a ,
S r e y a m s a
B a i r i g a n j a n
:
T h e
B a s e
o f
P y r a m i d
d i s t r i b u t i o n
c h a l l e n g e Product Classifcation Characteristcs e.g. Distribution Capabilities FMCG Small tcket size Standardized products Sold at a regular frequency Toothpaste, Soap, Shampoo, Toiletries, Cosmetcs Consumer Durables Goods that yield services or utlity over tmes Mid to large tcket size TV, Fridge, Fan, Cycle, Two Wheelers, Sewing Machines, Mixer Grinder, Radio Services Non-material equivalent of a good No restrictons of carrying stock (inventory) or raw material Involves opportunity cost for service provider Telecom, Banking, Health care, Insurance Agri-Inputs (Consumables) Recurrent purchase & consumpton for agricultural actvity Small to medium tcket size Essental in nature Seeds, Fertlizers, Pestcides Agri-Inputs (Durables) Fixed assets that yield service or utlity over tme and used for agricultural purposes Large tcket size carries percepton of once in a life tme purchase Tractors, Generators, Bore well Physical Distribution Promotion Credit & Financing Post Sale Services Information Contact Matching Negotiation Risk Taking Table 2: Distributon requirements across product classicatons 14 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 4.1 Distribution requirements of energy products for Rural BoP Energy products for the rural BoP, such as the improved cook stoves and solar lanterns produced by the companies studied later in detail in Secton 5, can be classifed as consumer durables. For energy product companies, identfying relevant marketng scenarios can facilitate the mapping of requirements for a rural BoP distributon channel as follows: Scenarios/Requirements of BoP energy products Applicable Physical Distributon Physical product (not service) is involved and is essental for delivery of the value propositon Yes Special packaging or sortng requirements No Unique storage & transportaton requirements No Promoton New product introducton Yes Diferentatng product Yes Increasing demand for existng products by creatng customer pull No Presentng product related informaton to customers as well as other players Yes Credit Discretonary products priced in a mid to high range Yes Financing All products & services Yes Post-Sale Services Products with relatvely high degree of complexity & maintenance re- quirements Yes Products requiring other complimentary (usually consumable) products for their normal functoning Yes Informaton Diferentated (Non-commodity) products & services Yes Contact 15 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Scenarios/Requirements of BoP energy products Applicable Absolute requirement for all oferings which are not essental for imme- diate survival needs Yes Matching Customizable products where alteraton (by design) of product atri- butes is required to suit customer requirements No Negotaton Customized products No Products for which price discovery mechanisms are not already estab- lished No Products with relatvely medium to high price points Yes Risk Taking Products with uncertain demand Yes Physical products with signifcant transportaton and inventory cost No Perishable products No Table 3: Distributon Scenarios/Requirements of BoP energy products Based on the above marketng scenario analysis, the six critcal distributon channel capabilites required by BoP energy products (improved cook stoves and solar lanterns) for rural distributon can thus be summarized as: (1) Physical Distributon (2) Promoton (3) Credit & Financing (4) Post Sale Services (5) Informaton, and (6) Contact. These types of energy products can be easily distributed through channels where (1) Negotaton and (2) Risk Taking capabilites are low and have no Matching capability. Numerous enttes, including the government, public and private sectors, partcipate in product distributon to the rural BoP. In this paper, they were analyzed as viable distributon channels based on the following criteria: a. Ability to make an independent decision on fnancial viability of a project (Financing capability) b. Ready access to rural BoP (Contact capability) 16 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Based on these criteria, the following six enttes were identfed as viable distributon channels: a. Proprietary Distributon 20 b. Non-Government Organizatons c. Co-operatves d. Self Help Groups e. Micro Finance Insttutons f. Rural Retail An in-depth evaluaton of each general model is provided in Secton 6. Apart from these enttes, the government public distributon system (PDS) also qualifed as a strong contender but was omited as it did not ft into the scope of this evaluaton, due to a lack of private partcipaton by the non-commodity oferings in this channel. 20 Proprietary distributon networks are included in the scope of this evaluaton as manufacturers/distributors can decide upon developing an independent go-to-market capacity and not piggyback on any of the existng market players. Other than proprietary distributon, most channels mentoned above are typically designed to carry a bouquet of products supplied by multple, distnct manufacturers/producers. 17 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 5. Case Studies Energy Products for the Rural BoP Representng most current models, the case studies profled below analyze fve distributon strategies adopted by companies working in Indias rural BoP markets. They aim to provide deeper understanding of distributon channels for the BoP by highlightng current distributon practces of new and established companies to reach mass populatons. Single distributon models do not answer all the requirements for any given BoP product. These fve case organizatons have developed hybridized approaches, and in some cases adopted multple distributon models, to tackle challenging issues like transportaton and warehousing of goods, post-sales services and others described in Secton 3.
Their hybrid approaches mean the companies leverage and integrate key aspects from several models to more efectvely reach their BoP markets. For example, one of the most discussed channels to reach BoP markets is based on leveraging the grassroots reach of non-governmental organizatons (NGOs). However, an NGO may not be well adapted or equipped to undertake credit and fnancing actvites. For these requirements, the BoP producer may have to look for another organizaton, such as an MFI, that can provide fnancial products along with the main product to create demand for the product, or cover purchase fnancing. Overall, employing hybrid distributon models has suited these companies well. Partnering with other BoP organizatons incurs less cost than establishing skill sets of distributon expertse within their own organizatons. In sum, the fve case organizatons have adopted the following approaches to reach the BoP: Organizatons Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 First energy oorja NGO + Rural Retail NGO (Proft-sharing model) (Partnership-based model) TIDE Entrepreneurs 21 Entrepreneurs Retail (VLEs) (Extension workers) (Rural + semi-urban) Prakt Design Piggyback Retail (Through an existng - - retail network) Enviroft Rural Retail Micro Finance Insttutons - D.light NGO Open market - (Grant-based model) Table 4: Existng distributon approaches used by some BoP energy product companies 21 The entrepreneurs mentoned here are integral roles in several distributon channels analyzed in Secton 6 and, therefore, are not considered an independent distributon channel, per se. 18 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Many organizatons adopt an NGO-based distributon model 22 to reach large rural BoP market segments; but, approaches to partnership building with NGOs difer based on company priorites. In the cases below, the three with NGO distributon models, First energy oorja, THRIVE and D.light Design, have been separated based on their NGO partnership terms to highlight the nuanced actons that diferent companies in the BoP space take to reach their end users. 5.1 First Energy Oorja Company Background: First Energy Oorja started as a partnership between the Indian Insttute of Science Bangalore and Britsh Petroleum (BP) Emerging Consumer Market (ECM) division to develop a stove using the power of innovaton and a strong understanding of consumer energy needs. 23 First Energy Oorja started promotng the stoves by conductng pilots in Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Initally incubated within BP, the company branched out as a separate unit in the 2009. In late 2009, First Energy Oorja was acquired by The Alchemists Ark (TAA), a privately-held business consultng frm 24 . Product/Technology: The First Energy Oorja stoves are promoted as low-smoke, low-cost stoves, which work on pellets an organic bio-fuel made of processed agricultural waste. The reduced smoke feature of the stove is achieved by using a fan that forces air into the fuel chamber for more complete fuel combuston, and by the stoves inner lining that allows for more complete heat transfer. In the earlier models, the fan was powered by exhaustble bateries that required regular replacements. The latest model of the oorja stove, launched in 2009, uses rechargeable bateries to power the fan. Since its incepton in early 2007, the price of the stove has been revised three tmes from Rs. 675 to Rs. 950, and to the current price of Rs. 1150. This increase in price is atributed to the increase in the cost of producton at the manufacturers end. 22 In this paper, NGO based distributon model is an approach to reach the end user where the company piggybacks on an existng NGOs reach to rural masses. This may enttle the NGO to gain beneft from the partnership. 23 Source: Growth and Innovaton Lights Up India by Adam Smith - The BP Magazine: Issue 4, 2007 24 First Energy Private Limited, Press Releases, Business Wire India, Mr. Raymond Moses. (n.d.). Press Release Distributon,Press Release India,Press Release Distributon Services. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from htp://www. businesswireindia.com/pressrelease.asp?b2mid=20232 19 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge First Energy Oorja Villgro/Adharam Local NGOs Samruddhi (Villgro) Shak retail (Adharam) Village level entrepreneur End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P First Energy Oorja partners two kinds of NGOs, larger NGOs with retail divisions in rural locations and also smaller and more decentralized NGOs. Smaller NGOs are helpful in making the product accessible at different locations, however NGOs with the retail outlets help the product in building up a brand in rural locations. End user Model 1 Model 2 Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice
Figure 3: First Energy Oorja Models Business model: First Energy Oorja depends mainly on local NGOs for the marketng and distributon of the stove. Apart from the NGOs, First Energy Oorja has forged te-ups with dealer networks in rural markets, such as Adharam Energy, Sakthi Retail and Villgro Stores, to market their products in rural markets. One of the organizatons involved in selling these stoves is Villgro Stores an initatve by Villgro that employs VLEs to market and provide innovatve afordable solutons to villagers. Villgro and First Energy Oorja involve the local community to beter understand the needs and demands of the target group through constant interacton with local people. A similar strategy is followed by Adharam Energy Private Limited (AEPL), which employs VLEs, known as Jyot. First Energy Oorja mandates the involvement of women from the local community who have never had sales experience is a vital component of their business model. They believe that this will help in the overall growth of the market and largely the society. Distributon network alternatves Model 1 (NGO + Rural Retail): This model addresses the necessity of adoptng a distributon channel, which increases the product visibility, reach and uptake across rural belts, to stmulate the product push and pull described in Secton 2.2. It also highlights the importance of partnering 20 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge with local established NGOs in order to give the product its frst push into the local markets. First Energy Oorja uses a distributon mix of NGO and rural retail organizatons to sell its product in rural BoP markets. The product is transferred from the company warehouse to the Villgro store, which is the retail division of Villgro in small towns. The Villgro store is used as a warehouse for the First Energy Oorja products and a hub/stockist for VLEs that distribute product in nearby villages. The store partners with a VLE who transports and sells the product in villages. The Villgro store performs the fnancial bundling of the product and extends credit to the end users through the VLE. This distributon model ensures that the product reaches remote locatons and is associated with an existng NGO brand. The NGO-Retail channel also ensures that consumers have a readily accesible store when they want to purchase the product or repair it. Model 2 (NGO): Alternatvely, First Energy Oorja partners with local NGOs to sell the product directly in rural areas. In this case, product pull created by the companys well known parent brand, BP, allows the company to sell its products through small, local NGOs. First Energy Oorja bears the cost of packaging and training the local NGOs, who work as last mile linkages. 21 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 5.2 TIDE Company Background: Technology Informatcs Design Endeavour (TIDE) is a non-proft organizaton, established in 1993, registered under the Societes Registraton Act of 1860. 25
TIDE focuses on promotng sustainable development through technological intercessions. TIDE supports and promotes a series of renewable energy and energy efcient products, specifcally focusing on energy efcient stoves, dryers and kilns for households and small enterprises. Product/Technology: TIDE has no specifc product of its own; rather, it focuses on bringing to market upcoming renewable energy technologies, at laboratories and research centers in diferent universites based in India and abroad, to market. A core part of TIDEs research focuses on the building of energy efcient cook stoves for poor households and BoP businesses.
TIDEs household stove initatve is termed the Sarala stove. This partcular stove model was designed at the Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Insttute of Science as a double-burner with a single feeding port. Its development incorporated user experience and feedback of Sarala stove pilot models. The stove is constructed at the end users premises using local raw materials, including mud, brick pieces, a tle piece, cast iron grate and a chimney. The cost of a single unit ranges between Rs. 250 to Rs. 300, depending on the size and material used for constructon. TIDE trains women to build this cook stove model using a mold. The same methodology is adopted in building bigger stoves, which are commercially used by silk reeling clusters. The most popular models are: Products Fuel used Fuel saving 26 Cost (INR) Charaka oven (Loose biomass) 30% over conventonal oven 2050 Groundnut husk Eucalyptus leaves Italian oven Firewood 40% over conventonal oven 3275 Cotage oven (6 pan) Firewood 40% over conventonal oven 11025 Chimneys for silk reeling Power operated: N.A 6000 10000 Grid based Table 5: TIDE Product details TIDE follows a model of training VLEs in taking up the initatve of building the stoves. TIDE selects its partners depending on the product and technology in queston. For example, TIDE partners with the Centre for Sustainable Technologies to build cook stoves and with those who have expertse in design to impart the training. 25 Technology Informatcs Design Endeavour.(2008). Overview. Available: htp://www.tde-india.org/06aboutus- overview.html. Last accessed 12 April 2010. 26 Technology Informatcs Design Endeavor. (2008). Household Cooking Stoves. Available: htp://www.tde-india. org/products/06household-cooking-stoves.html. Last accessed 18 June 2010. 22 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge TIDE also disseminates stoves for other rural industry sectors as well, typically areca boiling, jaggery making, herbal medicine preparaton, textle bleaching, dyeing, large scale cooking in commercial kitchens. Stove constructon training and installaton procedures are designed to ensure that only limited, permissible deviatons from standard design are carried out by the stove builder to accommodate end users opinion or convenience. This installaton procedure makes sure that the environmental benefts, as measured on the standard stove design, are delivered in actual practce to the maximum extent possible. Business model: The mission statement of TIDE is to identfy suitable technological interventons, to efect improvements needed for feld deployment and to undertake various measures to promote the spread of these technologies. 27 TIDE uses a four-step model to achieve its objectves of promoton and disseminaton of these sustainable technologies: a. Identfying technologies generated at research insttutons in India and abroad b. Assessing their suitability for the environment for which they were intended c. Further adaptng technologies to ft user requirements and local conditons d. Demonstratng and disseminatng the technologies TIDE trains university graduates or any enterprising local youth without a university degree to become extension workers and promote TIDE technology in new areas. TIDE incubates the graduates for up to two years; the trainees are prepared to become private entrepreneurs, to develop their own marketng strategy, and to work in a specifc geographical area with a controlled degree of competton. TIDE ensures that entrepreneurs promoted by TIDE are not competng against each other. For quality control, the entrepreneurs are required to keep detailed records of locatons of the installed stoves for TIDE. Since small BoP business owners have a low risk appette for taking on new technology and changing their working paterns, as described in Secton 2.1, TIDE stoves atempt to replace existng equipment with minimum interference in the daily working patern and routnes of users. New customers usually help to construct their own stoves, and the entrepreneurs educate the customers on how to use the stove properly. TIDE arranges interacton sessions for stove users, allowing them to learn from each other. Around 90 percent of the stove parts are produced using locally available materials. For remote installatons, the metal air chambers are purchased in urban areas. 27 Technology Informatcs Design Endeavour.(2008). Overview. Available: htp://www.tde-india.org/06aboutus- overview.html. Last accessed 12 April 2010. 23 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge The stoves product life cycle is four to fve years. Entrepreneurs ofer a one-year warranty on the equipment they have installed; afer expiry of the warranty period, servicing and repairs expenses are borne by the customer.
TIDE also has a for-proft retail division known as SustainTech India pvt ltd., whose retail showrooms display TIDE products in semi-urban regions. Sustaintech India is a retail outlet which has been setup by TIDE in a peri-urban area. This is a store which is for profit and charges a margin for building industrial or household level stoves. The employees are directly employed by Sustaintech India TIDE Sustaintech India VLEs End users Extension workers Local suppliers Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 End users End users TIDE is an NGO which trained VLEs and extension workers to build stoves. TIDE also funded the extension workers in setting up a business. Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice Figure 4: TIDE Models Distributon network alternatves Model 1 (VLEs): This model, in which TIDE does not distribute the physical product, highlights the importance of producing the product components locally, so that the end users fnd them more accessible. TIDE provides the training and necessary know-how to VLEs and connects them to the component manufacturers to be used in assembling/manufacturing TIDE products. Using locally manufactured components and materials, the VLEs build the products at the users premises or workshops. 24 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Model 2 (VLEs + Financing): This model of distributon is similar to the TIDEs frst model, in which physical transfer of the product does not take place, but this model features a larger product and fnancial bundling TIDE adopts this model for installaton of larger and more expensive stove units made for commercial vendors. Extension workers assist in building the product and TIDE connects the end users to fnancial insttutons and helps with loan applicatons to get them fnancing to get started. The extension workers are typically individual entrepreneurs who work on the product manufacturing. The extension workers, apart from being linked to parts suppliers, are fnanced by TIDE. The loan payback tme to the extension worker is around three years and the physical delivery or constructon of the product takes place at the end users locaton.
Model 3 (Semi-Rural Retail): TIDE also adopted a Rural Retail sale model. SustainTech India pvt ltd. is based in urban and semi-urban locatons where customers can come to a brick-and-mortar storefront to see the diferent stove prototypes. Stoves bought at the store can be taken home by the end user. In cases of large commerical stoves, the company sends extension workers to build the stoves at the end users desired locaton. 25 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 5.3 Prakti Design Company background: Prakt Design was started in December 2007. Its headquarter is based out of the southern part of India in the union territory of Pondicherry. Mouhsine Serrar is the founder/owner and also the technical director of Prakt Designs. They aim to create afordable, easily replicable fuel-efcient stoves for deployment in Asia and Africa.
Product/Technology: Prakt focuses on manufacturing improved biomass cooking stove. Their product portolio covers household and insttutonal stoves. They design stoves suited for diferent fuels: wood, charcoal. Their design aspect also includes stoves designed for using either light (manual) or dense (machine) briquetes. Prakt also manufactures the briquetes which are made from either urban waste or agricultural waste.
Business Model: Prakt design is primarily a product development lab. They are involved in the research and development / technology difusion /engineering / feld testng / pilot producton phases of the product. The pilot deployments are done with rural/BoP distributors. Once the product has proven itself to be viable, they license their product to producers/distributors. They also venture into producton if there is a sustained demand for a product. Prakt Design promotes its cook stoves through Selco. Selco has an existng network of stores which customize solar home systems. Prakt Design piggybacks its cook stoves through the Selco retail channel. The product fows from Prakt Design labs to Selco to the end user. Selco subsidizes bank loans for the end users by partnering with them and providing 5 percent loan relief. Prakt Design is Selcos preferred stove supplier. Till date Selco has ordered and sold 5000 of the Prakt Design stoves. 26 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge SELCO Sales & Service Center (Only SELCO Products) End Users Prakti Design Regional rural banks Prakti design labs promotes its cook stoves through SELCO, SELCO has an existing network of stores which customize solar home systems. Prakti piggybacks its cook stoves through the SELCO retail channel. The product flows from Prakti labs to SELCO to the end user Selco subsidizes bank loans for the end users by partnering with them and providing 5 percent loan relief. S U B S I D Y Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice Figure 5: Prakt Design Models Distributon network alternatve Distributon model (Piggyback - Retail): Prakt Design uses the existng network of SELCO to promote its products across Karnataka. This distributon model adapts the piggybacking approach, where in the product is using the already established network. The benefts of this model range from having a market base which is more tuned to environmental products to beter fnancial bundling of the product. Prakt Design end users also get to avail the 5 percent loan relief which the bank provides to Selco customers. 27 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 5.4 ENVIROFIT Company Background: Enviroft India started in 2007 as a part of the US-based non-proft organizaton Enviroft Internatonal. Enviroft designs, develops and markets improved cook stoves in the southern states of India, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. It sells stoves through a channel network of dealers, distributors, VLEs and NGOs. Enviroft India works in over 700 villages in Karnataka and over 300 villages in Tamil Nadu. 28 Enviroft Internatonal 29 , the parent company of Enviroft India, is a non-proft organizaton based in Colorado, USA, founded in October 2003, by Tim Bauner, Nathan Lorenz, Paul Hudnut and Bryan Willson. Enviroft Internatonal receives funding from Lemelson Foundaton and Shell Foundaton. Product/Technology: Enviroft India markets energy efcient biomass stoves to rural areas and a few semi and peri-urban locatons across India. According to Enviroft, the stoves consume up to 50 percent less fuel, allows for cooking up to twice as fast, while preserving the traditonal approaches to cooking, and generate 75 percent less air polluton than traditonal biomass burning. 30 Enviroft works closely with Colorado State Universitys Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory to develop new stove prototypes. It currently ofers four stove models in India priced between Rs. 750 and 2500, depending on the models efciency and number of burners. Business model: Enviroft sources product components through a global supply chain with a manufacturing base in China and an assembling unit at Coimbatore, India. 31 Envirofts supply chain department works closely with marketng and distributon partners to prepare sales forecasts 32
and to take inventory in the local markets. Enviroft uses a combinaton of transport optons to optmize tme to market, freight costs and inventory costs. Enviroft Internatonal has a partnership with the Shell Foundaton to support the design and marketng of the improved cook stoves and to fnd commercial partners to manufacture and distribute stoves. The Shell Foundaton provided $3.5 million seed funding as part of Envirofts goal to raise a total of $25 million of investment. Enviroft Internatonal claims to have higher penetraton levels and greater product customizaton as compared to its counterparts in Indian markets. 33 28 Informaton based on Enviroft India fgures. Anchan, H. (2010, June 3). Personal interview. Conducted by Bairiganjan, S. 29 Enviroft - Making the World Fit for Humanity. (n.d.). Enviroft - Making the World Fit for Humanity. Retrieved June 18, 2010, from htp://www.enviroft.org/ 30 Enviroft. (2009). Enviroft Benefts. Available: htp://www.enviroftcook-stoves.org/products/b-1100/benefts. Last accessed 18 June 2010. 31 Anchan, H. (2009,January 5). Personal interview. Conducted by Bairiganjan, S. 32 Sales forecast is done by the Enviroft State head ofce (Bangalore). 33 Enviroft. (2008). Our Impact. Available: htp://www.enviroft.org/?q=our-products/clean-cook-stoves/our-impact. Last accessed 22 June 2010. 28 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Figure 6: Enviroft Models Distributon network alternatves Model 1 (Rural Retail): Enviroft piggybacks on existng retail networks which can sell its product in the target markets. Enviroft focuses on local mult-brand retailers and distributors to build brand visibility in small towns and rural areas and minimize distributon tme (usually 24 hours from the tme of order). Enviroft also used its grants for subsidizing the product in order to gain market visibility in the inital years. Enviroft employs a local youth at the retail store to promote the stove. To gain market share and make it atractve to the local dealer/distributer networks, Enviroft subsidizes the cost of the stove by more than 60 percent through its grants and subsidies. The dealer keeps a 20 percent margin on the product cost. Thus, the overall rate of the product for the end user is 80 percent of the manufacturing cost. Model 2 (MFI): Enviroft India is one of the pioneers pushing products designed for the BoP through a MFI channel. It partners with Grameen Koota (GK), an MFI in Karnataka, to promote the stove product to the GK client base. The MFI customers interested in purchasing the stove can pay a Envirot Envirot regional oce District Level Distributon (Mult- Product) Local retailers MFIs (only for credit) End users Envirofit piggybacks on existing retail networks which can sell its product in the market. Envirofit focuses on multi brand retail shops to build visibility in small towns and rural areas. The MFI channel also uses the retail shops as the last mile to distribute the stove to the end user, MFI clients are offered a better rate than users who buy the stove directly at retail shops. Enviroft Employee Model 1 Model 2 Envirofit employee sits in the local retail shop MFI clients/End users Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice 29 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge deeply subsidized Rs. 500 with a stove coupon, which can be redeemed at a local Enviroft stove retailer. The MFI ofers fnancial product bundling to lower the Rs. 500 cost for the MFI client end user. In this model, the role of the retailer is limited to redeeming the coupon from Enviroft at pre-fxed rates, as it cannot charge any margin on the pre-fxed rates in this case. 30 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 5.5 d.light India Company Background: Sam Goldman and Ned Tozun formally started d.light design on May 31, 2007 with $250,000 seed capital from winning the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Venture Challenge, a business plan competton. The focus of the company is to provide high-quality, afordable light and power solutons to the rural poor. d.light calls itself an internatonal consumer products company serving people without access to reliable electricity. 34 To date, d.light has received investment from the Acumen Fund, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Garage Technology Ventures, Gray Maters Capital, Mahindra & Mahindra, Nexus Venture Partners and Omidyar Network. Product/Technology: Co-founders Sam Goldman and Ned Tozun, along with a team of founding engineers, frst designed d.lights solar lantern prototype in the Entrepreneurial Design for Extreme Afordability class at Stanford University in California, USA . 35 d.light designs and manufactures LED lights powered by solar and batery charge. It currently ofers three solar home light models (D.LIGHT S250, D.LIGHT S10 and Solata S380). The S250 is priced about Rs. 1350 and comes with a 1-year warranty. S250 has a 1-wat solar panel and a solar or AC-chargeable batery that, per d.lights claim, can last up to two years. 36 S250 has a mobile phone charging socket, which can recharge a cell phone batery in one hour. The Solata is a desk lamp, which costs Rs.700-800, and comes with an AC or solar-charge opton. Solata has a 360-degree head revolving opton, which is helpful for small businesses like barber shops. S10 is a household lantern with diferental power setngs; it costs Rs. 500 and is currently one of the lowest priced solar lanterns in the Indian market. Business model: d.light is a commercial social for-proft enterprise that designs and manufactures LED-based solar lights. d.light India was set up in February 2008 and Enviroft conducted a pilot in the Aligarh district of Utar Pradesh to get consumer feedback on the Nova (predecessor to the S250) and Solata lanterns. d.lights business model relies on channel partners (dealers and distributors) and the open market for product sales and promoton, as well as subsidies and fnancing for the end users in certain markets when it is absolutely essental. d.lights producton design team includes product designers, mechanical and electrical engineers and a group of quality control professionals to ensure quality in large scale producton. In 2008 34 D Light Design.(2009). Who we are. Available: htp://www.dlightdesign.com/about_who_we_are.php. Last accessed 29 March 2010. 35 Manu, A.B. (2009). Say goodbye to kerosene lamps, heres Kiran! Available: htp://business.redif.com/slide- show/2009/dec/23/slide-show-1-worlds-cheapest-solar-lamp.htm. Last accessed 29 March 2010. 36 Products - Nova Series (Global). (n.d.). D.light. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from htp://www.dlightdesign.com/ products_nova_series_global.php 31 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge d.light design End Users Open Market NGO Open Market Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice d.light uses NGOs as channels of product distribution. It partners local NGOs to promote its product. The NGO workers serve as agents who service the lantern in different regions. Other than the NGO channels, d.light sells its products through an open market network of retailers. d.light established its manufacturing operatons in China; the import duty and other taxes to bring the product to India add 11 percent to the overall cost of the product. This overall cost of the product does not include the cost of distributng the product to the end user. Beyond Solar, a US-based NGO that supported 162 lightng projects in the Koraput district of Orissa, purchased solar lanterns from d.light and distributed them to end users. Beyond Solar partnered with local NGOs and provided the lanterns to benefciary households. The local NGOs worked towards getng the repayment on the solar lanterns from the end users over a set period of tme. This distributon model worked as a regular installment purchase system, in which the local NGO acted as an intermediary that provided the end users with a cushion of paying over a period of tme. The end users provided their savings on kerosene every month to the local NGOs, which go into a community fund that can be utlized for village infrastructure projects. d.light also runs a subsidiary charitable initatve, known as Give Light, to provide solar lanterns to extremely poor rural households around the world. Previously d.light collaborated with two NGOs, One World Childrens Fund and Rural Educaton for Development Society (REDS), to provide donor-funded lights to Dalit households. As of July 31, 2008, the Give Light Impact initave has provided light to 11 villages, 531 families, 1,497 adults and 964 children. 37 This distributon network of d.light also partners with NGOs to distribute the grant-subsidized products. Figure 7 : D.light model 37 D.light Gives. (n.d.). d.light. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from htp://www.dlightdesign.com/gives.php 32 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Distributon network alternatves Distributon Model (NGO grant-based): d.light uses donor funding to subsidize the cost of the solar lanterns for the end user. This distributon model adapts the NGO partnership approach. The company partners with local NGOs to distribute the product to the end users. The NGOs take care of the post-sales servicing by pushing the product back to the company representatves. Internatonal NGOs provide subsidies for products and bundles them so that the payment optons become easier for the end user. The local NGOs have the role of physical product distributon to the end users and collecton of monthly fees for the amount saved on kerosene. This collected sum is transferred back to donors/internatonal NGOs who subsidize the upfront cost of the lantern for the end users. Local NGOs also play the additonal role of warehousing the d.light products. Distributon Model (Open Market): Apart from the above mentoned model, d.light uses the open market channel to distribute solar lanterns in remote markets. d.light is also uses a rural entrepreneur to distribute products in rural areas. LESSONS FROM ThE ExISTING MODELS The examples in the case studies highlight that there is no single soluton that can address all the distributon challenges associated with getng a rural-targeted BoP product from a manufacturer to the end user. The companys distributon network and its supply chain network have equally key roles to play in ensuring that the product reaches the end user at an afordable and atractve price. The partners highlighted above, such as an NGO, MFI, and VLEs, play diferent roles in the distributon channel of a product. For an NGO, the key factor is that it can use its presence/ spread and knowledge of the context very efectvely in taking a product forward to the end users. However, as highlighted in Secton 6 below, NGOs by virtue of their history, organizatonal structure and operatonal limitatons are not well suited to address the other challenges of distributon such as providing fnancial bundling for the products, providing afer sales services, etc. Similarly, VLEs, though very efectve in afer sales service and marketng the product through word of mouth publicity, have inherent limitatons in various other aspects of distributng a product. In order to have a robust distributon channel, the manufacturers or other stakeholders must assess the product features, identfy core challenges, prioritze them and then develop the distributon strategy by having an optmum mix of diferent distributon partners based on their diverse capabilites making use of their capabilites to ensure that their product is well received by the end users. 33 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 6. Generalized Models This secton evaluates six generalized distributon models based on the fve capabilites required for distributon of energy products for the rural BoP in Secton 4.1: a. Physical distributon b. Promoton c. Credit and fnancing d. Post sales service e. Informaton As mentoned in Secton 4, all six generalized models were fltered based on their ability to demonstrate the Contact capability required for distributon of energy products to the rural BoP. The generalized models highlight the relatonship and ownership dynamics that occur between multple stakeholders during distributon of consumer durable energy products to the rural BoP market, as exemplifed by the fve case studies in Secton 5. As in the real-life examples, variatons to the basic models ofen incorporate and hybridize features from several models to meet specifc requirements dictated by the BoP customer profle, product challenges or operatng environment discussed in Secton 2. 6.1 Proprietary Distribution Proprietary distributon channels are similar to retail distributon networks except that, in the case of proprietary distributon, the manufacturer/producer owns all or most intermediary levels to the end-consumer. Few manufacturers/producers choose to develop and own their own dedicated retail distributon networks, due to the complexites and prohibitve costs related to channel development, control, monitoring and management. However, a few manufacturers/producers stll might choose to develop and own dedicated retail distributon networks for branding, a desire to push a more complex product and an intenton to create compettve barriers to entry in niche markets. Proprietary channel choice is an expensive pursuit unless developed for funneling a suite of complementary products. 34 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Figure 8: Proprietary Model and Variants As discussed in Secton 3, the product requirements infuencing a proprietary models potental to demonstrate critcal distributon channel capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. If required to create, own and maintain their own storage capability, most manufacturers/producers might fnd it fnancially unsustainable in the early stages of business or in reaching out to new markets. b. Most manufacturers/producers have small product portolios. Building dedicated distributon capabilites (for small- to mid-tcket product oferings) to reach end customers is grossly inefcient as compared to other piggybacking optons, even though they might not be the ideal distributon solutons. Promoton a. For manufacturers/producers relying on scale (quantty) for proftability, the local disconnect & distance from the local markets diminishes their capability to undertake efectve promoton and increases their dependence on local intermediaries or opinion leaders. End user Company Retail arm of company Bank T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Basic Model End user Company Retail arm of company Village Level Entrepreneur Variant Company/ manufacturer/ Retail arm of the company reaches out to customers directly but extends credit privileges via banks credit schemes Banks pay the company for end-user purchase and collects payment from end-user as part of its own credit collecton cycle. Company/ manufacturer /Retail arm of the company reaches out to the VLEs and provides venture nance facilites for their product specic oerings. (Normally VLEs contribute with sweat equity) L E N D I N G R E P A Y M E N T Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice 35 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge b. Most manufacturers/producers are ill-equipped to access and manage mass media platorms. Credit and Financing a. Manufacturers/producers do not have a core competency or interest in design and development of credit products. Without partners, they further lack the capability to do credit appraisals and are reluctant to do collectons and deal with bad loan portolios. b. Manufacturers/producers are reluctant to link product performance with credit collectons from end customers for a sustained period of tme. Post-Sales Service a. For small-tcket items, most manufacturers/producers are reluctant to spend on post-sales service, as it is expensive to maintain client relatonship throughout the product life cycle, has high fxed cost to serve rural customer and erodes the tght margins earned by the sale. Informaton a. Most manufacturers/producers have no afordable means for creaton of or easy access to primary and secondary research on its target market and end customer. b. Most manufacturers/producers depend on experiental learning, dated public sources or conventonal knowledge by small manufacturers or producers. 6.2 Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) NGOs are legal enttes created by a group of people with no governmental afliaton or endorsements who come together to address a social cause or a related set of social causes. 38
NGOs generate revenue and funding in the form of grants from internatonal or natonal donors, membership dues, the sale of goods and services and private donatons. Large NGOs in India, such as Pratham and Gram Vikas, reach large populatons of benefciaries ranging from 2 to 10 lakh each. Their extensive reach becomes the primary driver for considering NGOs as distributon partners, in spite of their limited commercial capabilites and orientaton required for most products. NGOs can have decentralized structures, which can make decision-making for commercial endeavors a complicated process. 38 Uwhejevwe-Togbolo, Samuel. (2005). The Role of Non Governmental Organizatons (NGOs) in Development. Available: htp://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/artcles/samuel-uwhejevwe-togbolo/the-role-of-non-governmental- organizatons-ngos-in-development.html. Last accessed 12 April 2010. 36 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Figure 9: NGO Model and Variant Factors infuencing an NGO-oriented distributon models potental to demonstrate critcal capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. NGOs typically have weak distributon logistcs with limited access to storage and transportaton of goods. However, some NGOs have limited physical distributon capacity that was built during earlier government-sponsored market linkage programs. b. They possess limited inventory management skills and technical capability to take up large-scale physical distributon. Promoton a. Local NGOs know the context in a village through experience. They can leverage this knowledge to convey the use and importance of any new product, such as a solar lantern or an improved cook stove. Basic Model Variant Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Local NGO Retailing arm of NGO (optional) NGOs engage directly with the end customers through their existng retails networks / outlets, if available or through their eld sta NGO eld sta acquires any specialized skill required for servicing the end-user post sales. Company Village level entrepreneur End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Local NGO Retailing arm of NGO (optional) Company / Manufacturer reach out to locally present NGOs (with or without a retail distributon arm) and ask them to promote & sell their products NGOs engage Village level entrepreneurs (on margin / commission basis) for promoton and physical distributon of products. VLEs provide the last-mile coverage for the product by increasing awareness, nding interested customer, making product installatons(if required) VLEs also acquire specialized skills (if required) for any post-sales service Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice 37 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge b. Local NGOs are not traditonally set up in a way that they can promote a commercial product through mass media channels. Credit and Financing a. NGOs are not structured to promote fnancial lending as they normally lack the expertse required for handling and provision of fnancial products. b. NGOs use grant capital to reach the end users and are not eligible to receive direct investments. Post-Sales Service a. NGOs have beter reach in remote areas and can have a turn-around tme for service of less than a day, so they are ideal for post-sales service. b. Ability to repair and service a product can be inculcated through additonal training for NGO staf. Informaton a. Most large NGOs develop formal or informal databases on diferent demographic variables for their program specifc needs. These databases, containing feld-level inputs, can be leveraged by companies for formulatng efectve strategy and estmatng a regions atractveness for diferent products and services. b. However, most NGOs are small and maintain only operatonal data and have minimum capability to aggregate and produce data sets for commercial use. 6.3 Cooperatives A cooperatve (co-op) is a business organizaton owned and operated by its members for their mutual beneft. 39 Cooperatves are frequently defned as autonomous associatons of people who become the joint owners of an enterprise to meet their shared socio-economic objectves. A cooperatve is a designated legal entty owned and democratcally controlled by its members. Cooperatves share their annual earnings, divided among the members based on their partcipaton in the enterprise. Cooperatves have an approximate spread of 20.45 crore members spread across 4.53 lakh cooperatve societes (as of 1996-97). 40 Examples of cooperatves distributng 36 percent of total fertlizer consumpton in the country 41 demonstrate their overall capability 39 Tchami, Guy (2007). Handbook on Cooperatves for use by Workers Organizatons. Geneva: Internatonal Labour Organizaton. 40 Press Informaton Bureau. (1996-97). Evoluton of Cooperatves in India. Available: htp://pib.nic.in/feature/ fe0299/f1202992.html. Last accessed 30 August 2010. 41 Prof. K V Thomas. (2009). Conference on Development of Cooperatve Fish Marketng & Achievements on Insurance of Fishers (held at New Delhi on 20th November 2009), Speech of Prof. K V Thomas (Honorable Minister of State for Agriculture, Consumer Afairs, Food & Public Distributon, India). Available: htp://kvtnews.blogspot.com/2009/11/ conference-on-development-of.html. Last accessed 30 August 2010. 38 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge and preparedness for undertaking commercial assignments, if an appropriate support structure is available. Figure 10: Co-op Model and Variant Factors infuencing a cooperatve models potental to demonstrate critcal distributon channel capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. Cooperatves have a well-adapted infrastructure to work as warehouses because of their retail-style selling. They can also do inventory management and work as a network. b. Cooperatves, however, are not capable of moving a product long distances. They functon usually within a set area with readily available resources and manpower. Promoton a. Cooperatves are well adapted to promotng commercial products, although members are not skilled to take up promoton through mass media. Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Basic Model Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Variant Co-ops buy and hold products from the company / manufacturer Co-op members receive required training & informauon on products Co-ops through their retail outlets or members educate and increase product awareness and drive sales in their locallues. Certain credit co-ops nance the product they are promoung to their members & customer base. Cooperauves Retail arm of cooperative (optional) Cooperauves Retail arm of cooperative (optional) Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice 39 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Credit and Financing a. Cooperatves are credit support organizatons for small groups with similar interests or occupatons. Credit can also be a part of their services (especially in the case of credit cooperatves) that can be extended to the end user. b. Cooperatves can generate capital through multple channels, such as investors government holdings, and can further diversify into retail channels, which have the collectve power to bargain with the producers on schemes and ofers. Post-Sales Service a. Marketng and sales cooperatves can rapidly service products through their own service agent network. b. Major costs could be incurred in identfying and training key individuals who can look afer any service network created by cooperatves. Informaton a. Most cooperatves have well-developed organizatonal structures and are successful in certain geographies (e.g. Gujarat) with access to large BoP populatons. b. Cooperatves have access to local marketng intermediaries; however, they lack skilled manpower to pass on the informaton. c. Cooperatves are highly group-specifc with a focus on producton. They do not have the capability to do primary and secondary research on the local populaton. 6.4 Self Help Groups (SHGs) A Self Help Group (SHG) is a group of micro-entrepreneurs, typically 10-15 local women, with similar social-economic backgrounds, who voluntarily come together to save regular small amounts of money individually, while also contributng to a common corpus to meet their emergency needs on the basis of mutual understanding. SHGs were initally mobilized by NGOs that had broad ant-poverty objectves and have evolved to serve a variety of goals, including womens empowerment, livelihood enhancement, and improving health and nutriton. The group structure of SHGs reduces the transacton costs of external agents interested in dealing with large populaton bases which otherwise individually have small economic cycles, low sustainable demand and lack independent decision making capability, thus making them a unviable target audience. There are as many as 3.37 million SHGs in India (as of March 2006) providing access to 40.95 million poor 40 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge households. 42 SHG federatons 43 (especially those driving a predominant non-fnancial mandate) are ofen created by NGOs and government bodies with community development objectves. SHG federatons have extensive feld presence and organizatonal capabilites, however this might not necessarily lead to any commercial capabilites. Nevertheless, partnerships between private players and SHG federatons have been piloted with various degrees of success across value domains (e.g. HLL Project Shakt involved 42,000 entrepreneurs 44 and TATA-AIG appointed 400 micro-agents 45 ). Figure 11: ShG Model and Variant 42 A. De Montesquiou. (2007). SHGs in India: An Interview with CS Reddy. Available: htp://www.apmas.org/ pdf%5CSHGs%20in%20India.doc. Last accessed 30 August 2010. 43 A SHG federaton is a democratc body formed with certain number of SHGs functoning in a specifc geographical area with the objectve of unitng such SHGs for common cause and for achieving these causes which an individual SHG would not be able to do. In short, the SHG Federaton has to be necessarily of SHGs, by SHGs and for SHGs. (Source: APMAS. (2005). What is SHG federaton?. Available: htp://www.apmas.org/faq6.aspx. Last accessed 30 August 2010.) 44 Baillie, Doug. (2007). Unilever in India. Available: htp://www.unilever.com/images/ir_Unilever-in-India_tcm13- 113961.pdf. Last accessed 16th Sep 2010. 45 Business Standard. (2006). Tata AIG enters micro risk mart. Available: htp://www.tata.com/company/Media/in- side.aspx?artd=ZpisRfwJEDE=. Last accessed 16th Sep 2010. Company SHG Cluster End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P SHG Fed Basic Model SHG Member Company SHG Cluster End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P SHG Fed Variant SHG Member SHG Clusters nance the acvity of its members from their own funds. SHG Federaons buy and hold products from the company / manufacturer Federaon members receive required training & informaon SHG Clusters get required training / informaon from the company on product SHG Clusters aggregate the order for the company Products are delivered directly to the SHG Clusters Federaons receive informaon from the company / manufacturer and introduces them to its SHG clusters. SHG members provide the last- mile coverage for the product by increasing awareness, nding interested customers, making product installaons(if required) Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice 41 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Factors infuencing an SHG-centred distributon models potental to demonstrate critcal distributon channel capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. Some SHG federatons have access to infrastructure capabilites required for physical distributon, such as transportaton facilites and warehouses, obtained during involvement in previous government-sponsored market linkage projects. b. However, SHG federatons have extremely limited experience in managing supply chain logistcs and carrying inventory. Promoton a. Strong relatonships of SHGs with end consumers imply a high intensity touch-point and a persuasive seller positon. b. The lack of product knowledge (technological advancements) and trust-based relatonships might make persuading all SHG federaton members to carry a certain product a challenging task. Credit and Financing a. Most SHG federatons, including those with non-fnancial mandates, have the capability of executng basic cash transactons. b. Critcal actvites, such as credit product design and risk management, are stll outside the capability limits for most SHG federatons. c. However, most SHG federatons have limited fnancial capability to extend credit facilites to non-members for product purchase. d. The decentralized nature of SHG federatons restricts their capability for fundraising from external sources. e. Limited literacy and fnancial skills of most SHG members restrict their capability to undergo complex fnancial transactons, such as insurance. Post-Sales Service a. SHGs lack the capability and fnancial strength required for development of servicing facilites without external help. b. Lack of experience in providing such services can be compensated by adequate vocatonal training of SHG members to undertake such actvites. c. High commitment of SHG members to reach out frequently to the consumer base is an advantage. 42 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Informaton a. While SHGs normally consttute enterprising community members with real tme marketng informaton, such as local demographics and customer preferences, most SHG members can neither artculate nor organize such informaton for use at scale by external players. b. The decentralized nature of most SHG federatons and the physical spread of the locaton of these knowledge bases make it difcult for any external producer manufacturer to easily access marketng related informaton. 6.5 Microfinance Institutions (MFI) A microfnance insttuton (MFI) is an organizaton with the core mandate to provide fnancial services to the poor. This very broad defniton includes a wide range of providers that vary in legal structure, mission and methodology. Many new players in microfnance have large existng branch networks, vast distributon capabilites, and the ability to make signifcant investments in technology that could bring fnancial services closer to their clients. Increasingly, links among diferent types of service providers are emerging to ofer considerable scope for extending fnancial access. 46 MFIs and corporatons have realized that the relatonships, channels and infrastructure created for micro-credit can now be leveraged for delivery of services beyond credit. This will bring greater choice and value to the end consumer while opening vast new markets to corporatons in a manageable and cost-efectve manner.
While the microfnance supply market is estmated to consttute more than 500 players in India (NGOs and for-profts), most outreach is concentrated amongst less than 50 players, with the top 5 players reaching up to 55 percent of the member base with their approximately 16.4 million members. 47 The outreach, growth rates and fnancing capabilites of MFIs make them atractve distributon partners; many MFIs have already experimented with leveraging their strengths for pushing mobile phones, solar lanterns, improved cook stoves and white goods 48 into BoP markets. However, such experiments have faced signifcant challenges in the feld and have struggled to scale beyond the pilot stage. While MFIs contnue to hold a signifcant positon in the debate for alternate distributon channels for rural BoP customers, most product partnerships have 46 CGAP. (2010). What Is a Microfnance Insttuton (MFI)?. Available: htp://www.cgap.org/p/site/c/template. rc/1.26.1308/. Last accessed 26th Oct 2010. 47 Mix Market. (2010). MFIs in India|Microfnance India. Available: htp://mixmarket.org/mf/country/India. Last ac- cessed 28 August 2010. 48 The term White goods here implies major household appliances such as Television, Stove, Washing Machine and Refrigerator. 43 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge been atempted without an organized efort to match the kind of products with MFIs unique distributon capabilites. Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P MFI Basic Model Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P MFI Variant - 1 MFIs buy and hold product from the company/ manufacturer MFI receive required training & informauon MFI educates and increases product awareness amongst its customer base. MFI sells the product using its loan omcers/ other sta members MFI uullzes its training for providing any required aer sales service MFI nances the product it is promoung to its customer base L E N D IN G R E P A Y M E N T Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice Company Village Level Entrepreneur T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P MFI Variant - 4 Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P MFI Variant - 5 End User Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P MFI Variant - 3 MFI collects orders or provides informaton about its customer base and passes it to company / manufacturer. Based on the informaton company reaches the target base directly for product & service delivery MFIs reaches out to VLEs in its customer base to train & nance their actvity around the desired product Company reaches out to customers directly but extends credit privileges to MFI clients MFI pays the company for end-user purchase and collects payment from end- user as part of its own collecton cycle. L E N D IN G R E P A Y M E N T L E N D IN G R E P A Y M E N T Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice Figure 12: MFI Model and Variant Figure 13: MFI Variants 44 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Factors infuencing a MFI-based distributon models potental to demonstrate critcal distributon channel capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. While a few large Indian MFIs, such as SKS and BASIX, have shown interest in developing dedicated storage and warehousing facilites for BoP products, most MFIs are hesitant to invest in such non-fnancial capabilites. b. Most MFIs prefer to restrict themselves to providing credit facilites for products and then to partner with enttes who can own responsibility of transportaton, storage, inventory management and handling of physical products. Promoton a. MFIs enjoy mission-level synergies with social-beneft manufacturers/ producers, of improved cook stoves and solar lanterns, who aim to contribute to the economic wellbeing and standard of living of rural BoP customers. Most MFI loan ofcers are well placed to infuence the decision-making in favor of these products that are traditonally considered push products. b. MFIs group methodology creates the social platorm for actve discussion, which aids decision-making processes for new and improved products. c. Confict of interest may occur as MFI feld ofcers may present a biased view to push their credit oferings along with the product. Credit and Financing a. Driven by their core credit mandates, oferings from MFIs help bridge the working capital gap of micro-entrepreneurs allowing them to carry larger volume and variety of inventory. b. MFIs have alternate sources of earnings from credit actvites and most MFIs engage in livelihood enhancement actvites. MFIs are increasingly engaged in exploring commercial and sof sources of capital for their scaling needs. c. Excessive lending and spending on products, which neither directly contribute to the economic wellbeing of the BoP customer nor enhance their living standards, may lead to an increase in credit defaults and adversely infuence the portolio quality of MFIs. 45 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge Post-Sales Service a. Similar to physical distributon, most MFIs are hesitant to invest in developing dedicated capabilites for non-credit products. b. MFIs fnd litle incentve to provide post-sales service for non-credit products disseminated through them. c. MFI loan ofcers do not want to associate themselves or their credit oferings with product performance, as it can potentally create a reputatonal risk and adversely afect their portolio quality. d. MFIs carry reputatonal risk if the product delivers a sub-standard performance or post-sales service is poor, which might in turn adversely afect the MFIs portolio quality. e. Compared to VLEs, MFI loan ofcers have limited inclinaton to develop specialized skills for mapping product life cycles, undertaking product repair and maintenance work, which does not relate to their core ofering of credit products. Informaton a. MFI records can serve as valuable sources of informaton on several parameters such as local demographics, consumer spending, saving paterns and an end users ability to buy or aford certain products.
6.6 Rural Retail Rural retail consists of multple players: wholesalers or distributors actng as intermediaries and retailers actng as last-mile touch points to the end customers. Wholesalers/Distributors: Wholesaling or distributng is an intermediary role for the resale of goods or merchandise to various market players like retailers, industrial users, commercial enttes, or even to other wholesalers and related subordinated services engaged in distributon. Apart from their physical distributon role, wholesalers and distributors also frequently assemble, sort and grade goods in large quanttes to repackage and redistribute in smaller lots. Traditonally, wholesalers and distributors are located closer to the markets they supply than to the source of products. Wholesalers and distributors typically carry a bouquet of products supplied by multple manufacturers/producers.
Retailers: Retailing consists of selling products and services from a fxed locaton, such as department stores, boutques or kirana shops, in small or individual quanttes for direct consumpton by the consumer. A retailer buys goods and products in large quanttes directly 46 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge from manufacturers and producers or via wholesalers, and then sells them in smaller quanttes to end customers. Retailers are normally at the end of the distributon channel. Retailing might also include subordinated services, such as delivery. Marketers consider the process of retailing as an essental part of their overall distributon strategy. In India, retail establishments are ofen called kirana shops. Other than kirana shops, Indias rural retail industry has two more forms: Haats and Melas. Haats are weekly local markets that serve groups of 10-50 villages and sell FMCGs and day-to-day necessites. Melas are larger more sophistcated local temporary markets where durable consumer goods like TVs are also sold. Company Village level entrepreneur End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Distributor / Retailer Company End user T O P
L E V E L
P A R T N E R S H I P Distributor / Retailer Basic Model Variant Company / Manufacturer reaches out to locally present distributors - retailers and asks them to include their product(s) into the exisng product poo being promoted & sold by them Distributor / Retailer engage Village level entrepreneurs (on margin / commission basis) for promoon and physical distribuon of products. Distributors / Retailers engage directly with the end customers through their exisng retail networks / outlets Retailer employees acquire any specialized skill required for servicing the end-user post sales. VLEs provide the last-mile coverage for the product by increasing awareness, nding interested customer, making product installaons(if required) VLEs also acquire specialized skills (if required) for any post- sales service Product Credit & Finance Promotion Information S ervice Figure 14: Rural Retail Model and Variant Factors infuencing a rural retail distributon models potental to demonstrate critcal distributon channel capabilites are as follows: Physical Distributon a. Rural retailers are well adapted to physically distribute the product to interior regions. Rural retail chains typically carry a bouquet of products and have excellent storage, warehousing, and material-handling capability suited for rural interior regions. 47 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge b. Rural retailers (especially wholesalers and distributors) usually have robust inventory management systems in place to keep track of demand (including seasonal) and supply in various geographic regions. Promoton a. Retail networks are capable of reaching out to local intermediaries, radio, print media and events for promotng their products. b. Rural retail chains also design brochures, leafets and short movies that pass on the product message in the local language. c. Demonstratons and street plays promotng the product in local fairs are also staged regularly by rural retailers. Credit and Financing a. Credit and fnancing actvites of rural retailers are largely focused on discounts, rather than fnancial bundling. b. Credit te-ups are extremely rare for rural retailers. Linkages with other credit providers, such as MFIs, are stll rare and tend to be product-specifc, not channel specifc. Post-Sales Service a. Rural retailers tend to avoid carrying products with detailed post-sale maintenance requirements. b. Few semi-skilled professionals trained by manufacturers are available for repairing the product through retailers. c. However, if required, turnaround tme is usually short for product servicing or repair because of well-established outreach in rural areas. Informaton a. Established companies and rural retail players, such as the Indian natonal brands ITC and Godrej, have access to market informaton made available to them by market research frms. However, smaller players are dependent mostly on hands on experiental learning, informal networks or local trade bodies. 48 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge 7. Conclusion Manufacturers and producers are susceptble to fall into the trap of assuming that their role is complete once their products have been pushed to the frst link of the distributon chain. However, each member in a distributon network is undertaking a part of the responsibility. If suppliers of products and services for the BoP truly desire to be market-oriented, they must develop the capability to manage all facets of channel functoning untl the product is available to the end customer at desirable and actonable terms. This will not be easy for most small players. Finding the most suitable distributon partner might come at a substantal cost, increasing the importance of analysis of possible partners complete distributon capabilites and comparison with the product oferings unique channel requirements. (Refer to Table 6 below for critcal distributon requirements for energy products compared with capabilites of various distributon channels.) Critcal distributon requirements for energy products Proprietary Distributon NGO Co-ops SHG MFI Rural Retail Physical Distributon Promoton Credit & Financing Post Sale Services Informaton Contact Table 6: Comparing critcal requirements of Energy products for the rural BoP and channel capabilites. For manufacturers/producers of rural-targeted BoP products, the distributon channel decision is crucial to successful product adopton. As experimentaton with rural distributon models contnues, the exercise of marrying a product with the channel that satsfes the products unique distributon requirements will contnue to gain signifcance. The distributon framework and analysis set forth in this paper can help both multnatonal corporatons and small-to-medium enterprises alike assess the relatve importance of the distributon requirements of various products and prioritze channel alternatves available. It can 49 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge also act as a management tool for the design and evaluaton of a products go-to-market strategy in rural India. While some channels, such as MFIs, will remain in media discussions for variety of reasons, they are nowhere close to being the one-stop solutons to all rural BoP distributon problems. Other distributon optons, such as NGOs, SHGs and Cooperatves, need to be closely analyzed to create enough ground for experimentaton by feld experts and market players. Spending sufcient tme researching and experimentng with rural distributon choices before diving into the rural BoP markets can help large, medium and small companies prevent unnecessary crash and burns. Atempts to do it all alone will be difcult for manufacturers and producers who are beter of focusing their energies on their core competencies and forging relatonships with suitable partners. The cost of using intermediaries to achieve wider distributon is theoretcally lower, and this shifs the argument in favor of piggybacking distributon optons for most stakeholders. If the suitable opportunity presents itself, collaboratng with existng players who have ready touch points in BoP markets can provide manufacturers and producers with key strategic advantages. As distributon channels emerge as the vital links in reaching untapped rural BoP markets, they must contnue to stretch and evaluate their distributon capabilites. Any sustainable and replicable success would mean unprecedented bargaining power for the channels and would open up unexpected revenue streams for their stakeholders. The stakes are high and the winner, for once, might actually take it all, or at least a very signifcant porton. 50 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge References Allen L. Hammond, William J. Kramer, Robert S. Katz, Julia T. Tran, Courtland Walker (2008). The Next 4 Billion - Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington D.C: World Resource Insttute and Internatonal Finance Corporaton. Huhmann, S. (2004). Tapping Indias Rural Market. Journal of student research, p92-99. Ergeneman, A (2003). Disseminaton of improved cook stoves in rural areas of the developing world: Recommendatons for the Eritrea Disseminaton of Improved Stoves Program. Berkley: Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California. p1-49. Christen, Robert and Ivatury, Gautam (2005). A Systemic View of SHG Bank Linkage Four Sustainable Models. Washington D.C: CGAP (Consultatve Group to Assist the Poor). 1-12. C.S. Reddy, G. Bhaskar Rao, S. Ramalakshmi, V. Samatha, S. Vanaja, M.K.S. Murali Krishna, K. Raja Reddy, N. Tirupataiah, P. Poorna Chandrika, G. Trivikrama Devi, V. Sreenivasulu, Sridhar Kolluru, Ch. S (2007). SHG Federatons in India (APMAS). Hyderabad: APMAS. 1-155. White, Chris and Fearnon, Karen (2010). Developing the Next Generaton of Glowstar Solar Lantern. United Kingdom: University of Cambridge & University of Liverpool. 1-5. Williamson, Lionel (1998). Conductng a Feasibility Study for Marketng Cooperatves. Kentucky: University of Kentucky Cooperatve Extension Service. p1-3. Gupta, R.C (2005). The Role of Co-operatves in Community Economic Development. Canada: Rural Development Insttute Brandon University. p6-14. 51 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge About the authors SAChIN ShUKLA Senior Consultant, Strategy Advisory Group Center for Development Finance, IFMR Sachin is a development fnance expert for social venture capital funds, for-proft social enterprises, microfnance investment vehicles, development fnance insttutons and bilateral / mult-lateral insttutons.
Sachin leads the private sector development initatve at Centre for Development Finance-IFMR by facilitatng investments, providing business advisory services and developing platorms that promote private enterprises and compettve markets to become stronger and more inclusive. Prior to joining IFMR, he worked as an Engagement Manager at Intellecap, leading the incubaton of 10 select Tier-II/III Indian microfnance organizatons to atract equity capital. He also led the transformaton initatve for the livelihood fnance business of one of Indias largest livelihood insttutons to become a separate commercially-oriented entty. Sachin was also a Business Manager with IBM India leading Informaton Management brand development in South Asia. He holds a Bachelors degree of Technology in Mechanical Engineering from IIT-Kanpur and a Management Post Graduate degree from ISB-Hyderabad with specializaton in Entrepreneurship & Analytcal Finance. SREYAMSA BAIRIGANJAN Researcher, Rural Market Insight Center for Development Finance, IFMR Sreys work primarily focuses on understanding dynamics of the rural energy market. He studies specifc aspects like the business model, revenue model, growth opportunites and barriers for various organizatons working in the BoP social venture space. His research interests include developing instruments and toolkit for understanding the demand dynamics of the BoP markets, developing thematc notes highlightng specifc aspects of BoP markets such as the distributon model, marketng and communicaton strategies deployed by the BoP space companies etc. He is one of the main authors of the recently launched Power to the People: Investng in Clean Energy for the Base of the Pyramid report 52 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge along with co-authors from IFMR-CDF and the World Resources Insttute (Washington DC). The report looks at the investment potental in the clean energy space for BoP companies.
Prior to joining IFMR, Srey worked on as a short term consultant for a project with the Mult Commodity Exchange of India where he focused on developing trading models for the exchange of certfed emission reductons (CERs). He graduated with a MBA (PGDFM) from Indian Insttute of Forest Management in Bhopal. 53 | Page Sachin Shukla, Sreyamsa Bairiganjan : The Base of Pyramid distribution challenge About CDF CDF: helping Market and States Work for Development Centre for Development Finance (CDF), IFMR is an acton research think tank focused on improving government systems and markets capacity to channel fnance into sustainable, holistc development. The Centre for Development Finance is one of the seven research centers afliated with the Insttute for Financial and Management Research (IFMR) in Chennai, India. CDFs Strategy Advisory Group (SAG) specializes in addressing strategic and systemic issues, business challenges and organizatonal botlenecks, in the social and development sector. SAG is an eclectc mix of management consultants, development entrepreneurs and organizaton development experts leveraging best in class business tools and management practces. SAGs approach combines deep contextual knowledge and operatonal experience with academically grounded development insight to contribute to more efectve delivery of the infrastructure and services that are essental underpinnings for inclusive, sustainable economic and social opportunity. The SAG team provides strategy and operatons consultng for corporatons focused on the Base of the Pyramid. Our wide-ranging experience includes: implementaton of business models, systems and processes re-engineering, conductng feasibility studies and value chain analysis of rural and urban development projects and capital structuring for development enterprises. CDFs Rural Market Insight (RMI) initatve seeks to promote social enterprise that respects the BoP as both clients and consumers. To accomplish this, the RMI team draws upon behavioral economics, social psychology, qualitatve research methodologies, traditonal market research tools, and partcipatory rural appraisal techniques to develop - tools to help companies and investors more accurately assess demand dynamics in rural communites and concrete methods to efciently uncover consumer preference in BoP market segments. RMI seeks to improve the impact of social venture investng and social enterprise by delivering deep, actonable insight into rural market behavior. There is a gap in informaton accessible to companies trying to work in the BoP space. RMI brings in traditonal research knowhow and customizes it to suit the BoP market context beter. Through beter market knowledge, RMI distlls beter insights for the companies/ corporate/ policy makers to reach out to the BoP masses. Centre for Development Finance c/o Insttute for Financial and Management Research IITM Research Park Phase 1, 10 th Floor #1, Kanagam Road Taramani Chennai 600113 www.ifmr.ac.in/cdf March 2011 ` 1000/- 9 788192 098609