Defendant has reason to fear for his personal safety and the saety of his family if defendant was to return to pueblo, COLORADO. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities. He has attempted to resolve this matter with the pueblo district attorney's office.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Colorado Motion To Dismiss and Affidavit in Support
Defendant has reason to fear for his personal safety and the saety of his family if defendant was to return to pueblo, COLORADO. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities. He has attempted to resolve this matter with the pueblo district attorney's office.
Original Title
Colorado Motion to Dismiss and Affidavit in Support
Defendant has reason to fear for his personal safety and the saety of his family if defendant was to return to pueblo, COLORADO. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities. He has attempted to resolve this matter with the pueblo district attorney's office.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views6 pages
Colorado Motion To Dismiss and Affidavit in Support
Defendant has reason to fear for his personal safety and the saety of his family if defendant was to return to pueblo, COLORADO. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities. He has attempted to resolve this matter with the pueblo district attorney's office.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6
a
12
3
u
as
16
23
24
25
4
IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR
Pues
THE STATE OF cotoRano, cour oF evdiltye Mey
“3 PH a,
1S fa #26
Sia cp,
LER DUNT
THE PEOPLE Of THE STATE OF COLORADG, } case ne(“orcnray) MM OF pobyeeUr?
>
Plaintife, ) MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR ARREST
) OF DEFENDANT
LARRY WAYNE SINCLAIR,
Defendant
ee ee
COMES NOW, Larry Wayne Sinclair, Defendant, respectfully before
this Monorable Court, with MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT,
Assued by this court on the 23° day of May 2002.
In support of said Motion, De:
dant states as follows:
1, Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve
damage in upper and lower extremities.
2. Defendant is terminally ill.
3. Defendant's sole source of support and means of support has
been Social Security Supplemental Security Incone
disability payments until receiving notice July 30, 2004
that said payments were being halted due to belief that
defendant is fleeing to avoid prosecution.
4. Defendant only this year became avare of the Courts Warrant
and defendant has attempted to resolve this matter with the
Pueblo District attorneys Office.
5. Defendant has reason to fear for his personal safety and
the safety of his family if defendant was to return to
Pueblo Colorado. (SEE ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DISMISS)
6. Defendant sets forth true and accurate facts in attached
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR
ARREST OF DEFENDANT, which can be verified, should this
court grant relief requested.
MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT - 110
a
12
3
u
1s
16
a
18
19
20
21
2
23
24
25
WHEREFORE, Defendant preys upon th:
Honorable Court to GRANT
defendants MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT.
DEFENDANT FURTHER PRAYS UFON THIS HONORABLE COURT and THE
HONORABLE G.F. SANDSTROM, PUEBLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, TO CONSIDER
NITHORAWING CHARGES PENDING A COMPLETE INVESTIGATION. Doing so wovid be in
the best interest of The People of the State of Colorado, The People of th
City & County of Pueblo, Colorado, and this Honorable Court, Defendant will
Gladly cooperate with authorities investigacion with the requested condition
the defendants location not be disclosed.
Respectfully submitted this 34 aay
of August 2004.
MAILING ADDRESS ONLY
c/o 1341 Cody Ave
Pueblo, CO 81001
ATTACHMENTS:
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
&
Tzve and correct copies of the Motion to Dismiss Warrant.. and Affidavit in
Support of.. were faxed and mailed U.S. First Class postage paid to the
following:
Mr. G. F. Sandstom
District attorney
201 West 8 Street, Suite 801
Pueblo, Colorado, 81003
Fax (719) 583-6666
MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT - 210
un
2
13
14
as
16
a
18
19
20
a.
22
23
24
25
IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR OY py
THE STARE OF COLORREO, COUNTY OF PUEBLO 2A gyn
tn
Seay
CLE EON
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, ) case No.1 o1cR727 lv. FC OF OOH
)
Plaintite, ) DEFENDANTS AFFZOAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
) MOTTON TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR ARREST
ve. ) oF DEPENDANT
’
TARRY RRINE SINCLAIR, )
)
defendant >
)
tarry Wayne Sinclair, do under penalty of perjury, state the
following in support of MOTION TO DISMISS WARRANT FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT,
and as reason for such, states as follows:
1, Defendant Larry Wayne Sinclair did not steal nor forge the
1999 Federal or Colorado Income Tax ‘checks of alleged
victim Carmen Segura
2. Affidavit of Probable Cause for Arzest Warrant of Pueblo
Police Officer Michele R. Ellis is flawed and riddled with
false information. This information could have been found
to be false had it been investigated further. (DEFENDANT
18 IN NO WAY IS LAYING BLAME ON OFFICER ELLIS.)
3, Further investigation into alleged victim's claims would
have resulted in authorities finding alleged victim Carmen
Segura and her family have victimized defendant
continuously for more than three (3) years.
ide at 1320.5 E 4™ Street, Pueblo,
Colorado and did assist Carmen Segura and her husband
Rogelio Reyes in renting 1320 £ 4 Street. Mrs. Segura’s
brother Juan Gutierrez resided in defendant’s residence at
this tine.
4. Defendant did x
5. Officer Ellis’ affidavit claims defendant stole alleged
checks while alleged victim was in Texds. Mrs. Segura
failed to inform officer Ellis that defendant in fact was
with Mrs. Segura, her husband, brother, sister, brother-in-
Jaw and nieces in El Pass, Texas at the time Mrs. Segura
claims defendant retrieved her mail. Defendant rented two
(2) cars for this trip feom Enterprise Rent a Car on 29"
hs
2:25
‘Que,
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT - 112
13
uu
15
16
u7
18
as
20
a
22.
23
24
2
Stitet for thin teip. oefendant and alleged victins
sband beth secnived specdiag tieiate on eee ‘
to Pueblo in New Mexico, aries
Defendant and defendants fenily residing in Pueblo,
fororado have repeatedly been threatened with physical harm
by Mrs. Segura, her husband, sister, brother, mines, and
ethers. Mrs. Segura ard ner family went to defendanca
mothers home in Pueblo in May, June, July and August 2000
repeatedly verbaily threatening defendants mother, step-
father, niece, nephew with physical harm and on at least
two occasions threatening individuals from Mexico would
visit defendants mothers home and kill defendants family.
While defendant was in South Carolina in May and une 2000,
alleged victim Carmen Segura’s husband and brother Juan
Gutierrez entered defendants residence in Colorado City,
Colorado by threatening harm to defendants room-mate Jorge
Diaz, and did steal defendants furniture, electronics
equipment, clothing, art work, sports collectibles,
Personal papers, and 1997 Ford F150 Pick-up truck Carmen
Segura’s brother in £1 Paso, Texas sold to defendant on 4=
1-00. Mrs. Segura only returned defendants property after
defendant was inform by phone of this robbery, defendant
contacted alleged victin and advised her defendant would
have the Pueblo Police and Sheriffo Dept. called if
Property was not delivered to defendants mothers residence
within 24 hours.
Alleged victim Carmen Segura knowing made false report to
‘the Internal Revenue Service, Colorado Department of
Revenue and Pueblo Police Department concerning her 1999
income tax refund checks because Mrs. Segura’s husband and
brother failed to pay money owed in a large drug
transaction. This transaction has been the basis for
alleged victims acts against defendant and defendants
family in effort to put blame on defendant. Defendant has
copies of deposit receipts dated $~9-00 showing three (3)
deposits into three (3) separate Wells Fargo Bank Accounts
totaling fourteen thousand four hundred dollars in cash.
‘These accounts were used to launder drug money to Mexico.
Defendant did in October 2000, while residing and working
ip Sacramento, California, receive a call from his mother
advising she had received a phone call Carmen Segur:
brother in €1 Paso, Texas stating “..Tell Larry we want the
truck back. We have saved some money and now we can afford
to make the payments. Tell Larry if he refuses to return
the truck we will report ho stole the truck.” Defendant
contacted Z1 Paso, Texas Sheriffs Det. Rodriquez advising
defendant had received a threat of falee reporting. In
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPEORT - 232
B
14
15.
16
uv
18
19
20
2
22
23
24
25
10.
ue
October or November 2000 Carmen Segura’s brother and
sistercin-law did file report with El Paso, Texas Sherifts
Dept. claiming defendant borrowed truck while in El Paso in
October or Novenbez 2000. Defendant faxed copies of truck
payments to Detective Rodriquez as well as time sheets from
work showing defendant was not in Texas since March 2000,
as well as repaix receipts spanning six months prior to
theft report and repairs were performed throughout the U.S.
due to defendants travels. TEXAS AUTHORITIES CONFIRMED THAT
AUTO THEFT REPORT MADE KGATNST DEFENDANT WAS FALSE AND WAS
DONE TO HARASS, AND RETALIATE AGAINST DEFENDANT.
Alleged victims reporting to Pueblo Police in 2001 that
defendant had stolen and forged her 1999 income tax refund
checks is yet another knowing and intentional filing of
felse report in effort to cause defendant hardship and
difficulty for no other reason than alleged victims
inability to accept responsibility for her and her families
own actions. ALLEGE VICTIM FILED SAID REPORT WITH PUEBLO
POLICE OUT OF ANGER FOR DEFENDANT DUE 70 BELIEF DEFENDANT
SOME HOW WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ARREST AND DEPORTATION OF
ALLEGED VICTIMS HUSBAND. THIS AFTER 1.) Threats of
physical harm and even death against defendant, defendants
mother, stepfather, and others; 2.) Robbery of defendant’s
xesidence by hex husband and brother; 3,) Filing of false
Police report in Bl Paso, Texas accusing defendant of auto~
theft; ALL FAILED TO PRODUCE THE RESULTS alleged victim
desired.
Defendant acknowledges that the alleged checks were infact
deposited into defendants Pueblo Bank & Trust Account. NO
THEFT OR FORGERY WAS INVOLVED. Alleged victims brother
Juan Gutierrez gave defendant both checks. At the time Mr.
Gutierrez gave defendant said checks both checks had
already been endorsed on the back. Defendant was told by
Mr. Gutierrez said checks were meant to pay most of the
monies owed defendant by alleged victim Carmen Segure and
her brother Juan Gutierrez. Some of the monies owed
defendant by alleged victim and her brother included Bight
hundred sixty-five dollars ($265.00) in rent U.S. West cell
phone bills, house telephone bill, gas and electric bills
owed by alleged victims brother Juan Gutierrez, One
thousand six hundred eighty-three dollars & 05/100 cents
led to nis Associates Visa card, card number
on October 1:, 1999 for alleged victim and
her brother Juan Gutierrez at Pyramid Motors auto auction
for the purchase of vehicle for victims brother.
Approximately One thousand three bundred dollars paid in
tow costs, transmission repairs in February 2000 for
alleged victim on alleged victims brothers Ford Van. Other
monies owed included furniture sold to alleged victim.
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT - 310
a
12
13
ua
15
16
a7
18
19
20
a
22
23
24
25
12, DEFENDANT HAS CONTACTED THE PUEBLO COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS OFFICE IN EFFORT 70 RESOLVE THIS MATTER,
13, DEFENDANT DOES TRULY FEAR FOR HIS AND HIS FAMILIES PERSONAL
SAFETY SHOULD DEFENDANT RETURN TO PUEBLO.
14, DEFENDANT IS VICTIM OF PALSE REPORTING FOR THE SOLE PURFOSE
OF ALLEGED VICTIM OBTAINING DEFENDANTS WHERE A BOUTS.
ALLEGED VICTIM SEEKS TO USE DEFENDANT AS SCAPE GOAT FOR HER
HOSBANDS AND BROTHERS PROBLEMS WITH MEXICAN DRUG DEALERS
FOR THE THEFT OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY IN THE SUMMER OF
2000.
‘The above statements are true and correct and support defendants
motion to dismiss warrant to arrest defendan:
G.F. Sandstrom
District Attorney
201 W. Highth Street, Suite 801
Pueblo, co 61003
Fax (719) 583-6666
APFIDAVET IN SUPPORT - 4
MAILING ADDRESS ONLY
c/o 1341 Cody Ave
Pueblo, CO 81001
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.