Feasibility Study On The CSU Stadium Project

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
ON-CAMPUS STADIUM FEASIBILITY STUDY

AUGUST 9, 2012
Presented by: Presented to:
CSU ON-CAMPUS STADIUM FEASIBILITY STUDY
August 9, 2012
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary

1
Site Selection
A through F test fits with site information
Criteria Matrix
B C D Sites Graphic
C Site Plan
o Phase 1
o Phase 2
o Phase 3
o Collection of Phases
Transportation Narrative
Transportation Maps

5
11
12

13
14
15
16
17
24

Design and Best Practices
Visioning
Typology
Building Program
o Uses
o Detailed Program Matrix
Concept Design
o Floor Plans
o Elevations
o Sections
Renderings
LEED Score Sheet

31
44

56
57

68
75
77
78
81
Market Analysis and Funding Sources
CSL Market Study Report
Funding Sources Presentation

83
101
Neighborhood Meetings Summary

109
Project Budget and Schedule
Rider Levett Bucknall Construction Estimate
Comprehensive Budget
Schedule

113
122
124

CSU on-CampUS StadiUm FeaSibility StUdy
August 9, 2012
1
Executve Summary

1. The SAC members are Co-Chairman Jack Graham (CSU Director of Athletics), Co-Chairman Amy Parsons (CSU Vice President for
University Operations), Brett Anderson (CSU Vice President Advancement), Eric Berlinberg (ASCSU President), Farrah Bustamante (CSU
Staff Representative), Todd Donavan (CSU Faculty, College of Business), James Francis (CSU Faculty, Athletics Representative), Mark Gill
(Chief of Staff, CSU Presidents Office), Connie Hanrahan (Community Representative), Blanche Hughes (CSU Vice President of Student
Affairs), Diane Jones (City of Fort Collins), Stu MacMillan (Community Representative), Tom Milligan (CSU Vice President of External Affairs),
Darshan Shah (CSU Alumni Association Board), Jim Smith (Community Representative), Regina Martel (ASCSI President-Elect, 12-13)
8101 East Prentice Avenue, Suite 900 | Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | 303-796-2655 | www.iconvenue.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In January 2012, Dr. Tony Frank appointed a Stadium Advisory Committee (SAC)
1

comprised of fifteen (15) members from the campus community and the City of Fort Collins
to evaluate the feasibility of a new, on-campus multi-purpose facility (Facility or
stadium) for Colorado State University (CSU). The Facility would be the new home of
the CSU football program, other sports activities, and would also provide an array of new
spaces that would be available for use by all sectors of CSU throughout the year. The on-
campus location of the Facility would energize and engage the CSU campus and
surrounding Fort Collins and Northern Colorado community.

During the SACs initial February 3 meeting and in order to proceed with the directive from
Dr. Frank, the following four (4) subcommittees were created: Site Selection, Market
Analysis and Funding Sources, Design and Best Practices, and Alumni, Campus and Public
Engagement. During the past eight (8) months, the SAC has gathered information, engaged
constituents, and evaluated the information related to the feasibility of the Facility.

Pursuant to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, ICON Venue Group (ICON)
and Populous were chosen to lead the feasibility study and our services were activated on
April 1, 2012. Because of the complexity of the study and expedited time frame, we engaged
the following consultants to provide additional expertise in the areas of market analysis,
financial modeling and projections, premium seating composition and pricing, traffic and
parking assessment, stadium cost estimating, sound assessment, and electrical and light
systems: Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB),
Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB), Wright, Johnson, Haddon and Williams (WJHW), and
M-E Engineers (M-E).

Overview of Lead Firms for Feasibility Report

ICON Venue Group

ICON is the leading Owners Representative firm in the sports and entertainment industry
providing the full spectrum of venue development services including project feasibility,
financing, site selection and acquisition, facility programming, design development,
construction phase management, venue commissioning, sponsorship sales and servicing, and
start up operations. ICON has worked with both public sector and private sector clients and
has managed several of the most successful arena and stadium projects in the world.

Tim Romani, President and CEO
As a leader in the sports facility development industry for over 20 years, President and CEO
Tim Romani is directly responsible for guiding and completing landmark stadium and arena
projects for NBA, NHL, NFL, MLB, and MLS teams totaling more than $4 billion and
2 of 7
including INVESCO Field at Mile High (currently Sports Authority Field at Mile High) in
Denver, Colorado.

Mr. Romanis innovative and sophisticated approach to project management, particularly in
the focus areas of Preconstruction and Project Controls, has revolutionized the way sports
projects are delivered. Establishing, communicating, and managing cost and schedule
mandates is the hallmark of how ICON operates on behalf of its clients and sets ICON apart
from other firms. In addition to his responsibilities with ICON, Mr. Romani also served as
Vice Chancellor of Planning and Development for the University of Colorado. In that
capacity, he was responsible for planning and constructing the new Anschutz Medical
Campus in Aurora, Colorado, which involved three hospitals, a world-renowned medical
research complex, and the entire University of Colorado Health Sciences Center campus
totaling approximately $2 billion and 4 million square feet.

Ray Baker, Partner, Gold Crown Management
Ray Baker, a Partner at Gold Crown Management, partnered with ICON for this project to
bring large scale public development and funding expertise to the project team.

Mr. Baker, a member of the Colorado Economic Recovery and Accountability Board, is also
the Chairman and board member of the Denver Metropolitan Major League Baseball
Stadium District. He was instrumental in the development of Coors Field and directed the
delivery and timely refinancing of the stadium to enable Denver to pay off the bonds 10
years earlier than anticipated.

Subsequently, Mr. Baker was appointed by the Colorado legislature as Chairman and board
member of the Denver Metropolitan Football Stadium District. In this role, he guided the
INVESCO Field at Mile High (currently Sports Authority Field at Mile High) development.
His efforts were paramount in the site selection, design, development, and opening of the
$401 million, 76,125 seat stadium.
Populous

Populous is a global design practice specializing in environments that draw people and
communities together for unforgettable experiences. For more than a quarter century,
Populous has planned and designed many of the most recognizable gathering places on the
planet. In total, Populous has designed 1,000 projects worth $20 billion. More than a billion
people have experienced a Populous stadium, arena, convention center or event.

Scott Radecic, Populous
As a Senior Principal with Populous, Scott Radecic is a member of the companys Executive
Group and the director of the firms collegiate market. He specializes in servicing University
and National Football League clients. He has extensive experience in all areas of sports
facility strategic planning, design, budgeting and project management. Scott has led the
collegiate group at Populous since 1998. He and the collegiate team have worked on more
than 100 campuses, addressing all aspects of collegiate facility development.

August 9, 2012
2
Executve Summary
3 of 7
Conventions, Sports, & Leisure International

Founded in 1988 by former partners, directors, and consultants with Coopers & Lybrand
(now PricewaterhouseCoopers), CSL is a leading advisory and planning firm specializing in
providing consulting services to the sports, entertainment, and leisure industries.
Collectively, with over 150 years of specific sports and convention industry consulting
experience, members of the firm have completed over 1,000 engagements. CSL has assisted
over 60 Division I collegiate athletic programs in understanding various market and financial
issues surrounding athletic facility developments, including similar football stadium projects
for schools such as Arizona State, Baylor, Cincinnati, Colorado, Iowa, Iowa State,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi State, Missouri, North Carolina, Northwestern, Notre
Dame, Oregon, Oregon State, Penn State, Purdue, Rutgers, South Carolina, Texas A&M,
Texas Tech, Washington, Washington State, and West Virginia, among numerous others.

Bill Rhoda, Principal
As a Principal with CSL, Bill Rhodas experience in the sports industry includes managing
assignments focusing on all primary marketing and financial issues on more than 500
previous projects over the past 18 years. His clients have ranged from professional sports
teams such as the Dallas Cowboys, Orlando Magic, Seattle Seahawks, New York Mets and
Phoenix Coyotes to municipalities including the City of Las Vegas, City of Tulsa, Nassau
County (N.Y.) and Collin County (Texas) to universities such as Oregon, Michigan, Texas
Christian University, and Texas A&M. Mr. Rhodas recent marketing and sales experience
includes the planning and execution of the sales campaigns for the New York Yankees, New
York Giants and New Meadowlands Stadium.

Components of the Feasibility Report

The contents of this Feasibility Report summarize our work in collaboration with the SAC
and each of its four (4) subcommittees. Additionally, we have prepared an overall project
budget and schedule.

Site Selection Subcommittee ICON and Populous spearheaded an effort to identify and
evaluate a total of six (6) potential sites (A, B, C, D, E, and F) on campus. Each site was
analyzed across a long list of physical and contextual parameters to make sure that a
multipurpose stadium would fit and orient itself on the site in a manner that would be
complementary with the existing campus and compatible with CSUs future master plan. We
also quantified any budget or schedule related parameters such as infrastructure required to
activate the site or demolition and replacement of existing buildings. Using a criteria matrix,
we developed a list of pros and cons for each site. As a result of that site analysis, ICON and
Populous forwarded a recommendation of the optimal site alternative, Site C, which is
depicted on page 7 of this Report.

The multipurpose stadium would be sited along the south edge of the campus between Lake
and Pitkin Streets. It would have a preferred north south orientation with a traditional
horse shoe configuration. The venue would be centered on Meridian with its open end facing
north creating a welcoming embrace to the campus. An Alumni Welcome Center would
engage with the stadium at the southeast corner and potentially become an integrated
element. A parking garage would be constructed to the west of the stadium replacing the
4 of 7
1,500 spaces displaced by the stadium footprint. Also, some of the PERC facilities would be
relocated and others improved as part of the stadium project. Finally, an inviting plaza
would be incorporated to the north that would engage the existing campus context and
provide graceful connectivity for students, faculty, administrators and visitors to interact
with the new venue with a proper sense of scale and intimacy. Site C can be developed in
three (3) phases as outlined on page 16 in this Report: Stadium, Meridian Walk of Colleges,
and Campus Development.

In conjunction with the selection of a site for the Facility, we also engaged experts to provide
preliminary impact assessments of the Facility in the specific areas of traffic, parking, sound
and light. PB assessed parking and traffic while M-E assessed light and WJHW assessed
sound. PBs assessment provided a transportation management plan overview for the
Facility on Site C that includes assessments of access routes to the Facility, walking
distribution from CSU housing to the Facility, and existing parking supply both on campus
and in downtown Fort Collins to support the Facility. The overview focuses on managing
parking and traffic congestion, maintaining the integrity of local neighborhoods, and
promoting alternative modes of transportation. It estimates a maximum parking demand of
10,780 passenger vehicles and a parking supply of 11,461 with 10,780 of such spaces
(assuming 100% availability) within a 20 minute walk of the Facility. Finally, the overview
recommends the development of a more detailed transportation management plan during the
upcoming months that will incorporate feedback from the surrounding neighborhoods along
with the specific components outlined in PBs assessment. The assessment and
accompanying maps are included on pages 17-28 of this Report. The M-E and WJHW
assessments for light and sound are included in the Appendices to this Report.

Design and Best Practices Subcommittee Initially, ICON and Populous accompanied several
SAC members on visits to Stanford University and the University of Minnesota to gain
invaluable insight regarding the development of two recent collegiate stadium projects.
Subsequently, Populous conducted an extensive visioning process engaging a comprehensive
collection of stakeholders from within CSU and the broader Fort Collins community.
Numerous narratives spawned from that process that describe a unique set of attributes and
aspirations for the initial concept design and will inform the future development of the
design for the Facility. The floor plans, sections and elevations for this concept design are
outlined on pages 68-77 in this Report. At the same time, ICON and Populous generated a
Program for the project detailing the components, scale and adjacency requirements. Based
on our 640,000 square foot target, we have diligently revised the stadium Program and
analyzed all of its components to ensure that we are producing a program that is both
impressive and efficient in space allocation and use. The close collaboration of ICON, CSL,
and CSU has produced an array of premium seating options that will maximize the revenue-
generating capacity of the stadium. Currently, the Program includes 22 suites of varying
sizes and capacities, 40 loge boxes, 896 club seats and 8,000 priority seats. The total capacity
for the stadium is currently programmed at 44,380 including a plaza at the north end
accommodating 4,400 standing room fans as well as a fun gathering place for a myriad of
other campus functions. Consistent with the sustainability objectives of CSU, our initial
analysis demonstrates that the stadium can be LEED-certified at the Silver level.

Market Analysis and Funding Sources Subcommittee The subcommittee collaborated closely
with ICON and CSL on all aspects of this analysis. CSL conducted a comprehensive market
August 9, 2012
3
Executve Summary
5 of 7
study that included an extensive market research survey. The survey was the basis for
quantifying the prospective stadium revenues associated with sponsor and premium ticket
inventory. The market study also identified a broad range of typical and creative revenue
elements in and around a proposed on-campus multipurpose stadium. Sponsor opportunities
including naming rights related to the stadium, field, plazas, entrances, spectator gathering
zones, premium levels, and other assets were evaluated both for annual and one time
revenue streams. Similarly, premium seating packages such as suites, club seats, loge boxes,
priority seats and accompanying lounges and other amenities were also analyzed and
quantified. Regular game day revenues such as general ticket sales, concessions, parking,
facility development fee, merchandise, etc. were evaluated as were revenues derived from the
many other uses for the stadium.

The CSL market study data was used to create a revenue model which allows for varying
assumptions regarding ranges of net annual proceeds. CSU financial representatives have
reviewed the model and met with ICON and CSL regarding the components of the model
which includes three (3) scenarios: a low, base and high case. Annual stadium revenues
provide the basis from which financing strategies can be developed and evaluated. The
model projects a net proceeds range of $7.6M to $13M. In addition to the prospective
stadium revenues, donor support is currently estimated to produce between $45M and
$220M in funding for this project. A very detailed analysis of potential donors and giving
levels provides a road-map for the CSU Development staffs efforts.

A summary slide of all potential funding sources is on page 108 of this Report. This
summary outlines the projected revenue ranges for (a) corporate naming rights and
sponsorships, (b) premium seating, and (c) event/facility development fees/non-game
day/stadium rental opportunities. The sum of these annual revenue streams establishes a
financeable total ranging from $128M - $217M that is coupled with the range of private
donations to generate a range of total project funding sources of $173M to $437M.

Alumni, Campus, and Public Engagement Subcommittee - ICON and Populous were involved in
a number of public input opportunities and also conducted a series of neighborhood
meetings. We had key roles in the April 16 and 17 public forums regarding the feasibility
process and supported the on-campus forums on the Lory Student Center Plaza on May 1
and 2, held by the Associated Students of Colorado State University. We were also part of
the presentations at the Ram Athletic Donor events on May 8 and 9 along with the Founders
Circle meeting on May 17.

In addition to participating in each of the SAC public meetings since being engaged, ICON
and Populous conducted neighborhood meetings on July 26 and 30 at the Plymouth
Congregational Church in Fort Collins to engage directly with neighbors regarding the
traffic, parking, sound, and light impacts of the Facility. During the meetings, ICON and
Populous provided initial assessments of the impacts and, importantly, solicited input from
surrounding neighborhoods regarding these impacts to incorporate into the continued study
of the impacts. A summary of the neighborhood meetings including questions, answers and
general comments is contained in this Report in the section entitled Neighborhood Meetings
Summary.

6 of 7
Finally, ICON, Ray Baker, and CSL made a presentation regarding the Feasibility Report
on August 3 during the Colorado State University System Board of Governors meeting in
the Occhiato University Center at Colorado State University-Pueblo.

Project Budget and Schedule - Collectively, the Vision and Program Documents along with
floor plans, cross sections, elevations and artist renderings as developed by Populous, were
provided to ICON and RLB, our cost estimator, to develop a preliminary construction cost
model. RLB is a world-renowned quantity surveyor firm with extensive stadium specific
experience and expertise. Both ICON and Populous have worked with RLB on numerous
stadium estimating projects and have a very high degree of confidence in its work. RLBs
detailed cost estimate was prepared on May 22, 2012 and is based on a stadium of 773,637
gross square feet (gsf). More recently, the square footage of the stadium was reduced to
640,866 gsf to comply with the budget goal, which is detailed later in this Report. Due to
time constraints, the floor plans and sections in the Report have not been modified to reflect
this gsf reduction.

ICON prepared a comprehensive Project Budget incorporating the construction cost analysis
prepared by RLB. The central cost metric coming from the RLB estimate was the conclusion
that a stadium of the type and scale illustrated in the Populous Conceptual Design would
cost in the range of $250 per square foot. The current program for the stadium describing all
components targets a venue of 640,866 gsf resulting in a construction cost equal to $160M.
The other project costs including start up expenses, sales and marketing, site development,
design and professional services, systems and equipment, legal and governmental, testing
and fees, insurance and contingency bring the total stadium project budget to $228M. A
detailed cost assessment of the off-site utility and roadway improvements needed to enable to
the proper access and use of the venue total an additional $15.5M and $2.5M, respectively.
The total project cost for all three (3) components equals $246M.

Costs to relocate the PERC facilities and build the Alumni Welcome Center and parking
garage are not included in the above total project cost. These components will require an
independent budget and funding sources. The estimate for these components based on our
current scope understanding including a 26,000 sf program for the Alumni Welcome Center
and a single 1,551-car garage is $51M. The final program and related costs for these
components will be developed in collaboration with CSU Facilities Staff, but additional
project definition may result in a modified scope and updated cost estimates. The estimate
for the PERC relocation is based on a comparable replacement of current facilities. The
comprehensive Project Budget is outlined on pages 122-123.

A conceptual project schedule was developed that demonstrates that the proposed project
could be designed and constructed within a three year period. The schedule is comprised of
two (2) phases with Phase 1 including the tasks completed by the feasibility report and Phase
2 including design, pre-construction, and construction of the Facility. For illustrative
purposes, the schedule targets schematic design to commence in September 2012 and
construction to commence in September 2013 with project completion in August 2015. The
schedule is presented on page 124.

August 9, 2012
4
Executve Summary
7 of 7
Conclusion

Dr. Frank appointed the SAC to explore the possibility of constructing an on-campus, multi-
purpose facility at CSU. Since April, ICON and Populous have worked in conjunction with
the SAC in determining the feasibility of the Facility. In a mere four (4) months, we have
completed an enormous body of work across multiple areas of evaluation highlighted by the
following:

a) Consistent and diligent coordination with the SACs subcommittees
b) Personal visits to Stanford University and the University of Minnesota to assess their
stadium projects
c) An in-depth analysis of possible on-campus sites for the multi-purpose facility and a
resulting recommendation
d) Development of an efficient and cost-effective stadium program with an array of
compelling amenities and premium seating choices
e) Development of stadium master plan and concept design
f) Preparation of a detailed cost estimate for the Facility
g) Initial assessments of the traffic, parking, sound, and light impacts of the Facility on
the campus and surrounding neighborhoods
h) Completion of a comprehensive market study to develop projections for stadium
revenue
i) Creation of revenue models that include low, base, and high scenarios
j) Establishing total project funding sources and accompanying ranges of projected
revenue
k) Preparation of a comprehensive project budget for the stadium
l) Preparation of an initial project schedule with a target opening of August 2015

The current climate in higher education is both turbulent and unchartered. CSU has a great
opportunity to invest in an on-campus, multi-purpose facility that will be the ignition for a
new era for the university as envisioned by Dr. Frank and compatible with its master plan.
Importantly, the Facility can generate benefits for all sectors of the university. Based on our
work and consistent with the Dr. Franks mandate, we conclude that an on-campus, multi-
purpose facility can be constructed at CSU for $246M with a target opening of August 2015.

August 9, 2012
5
Site Selecton
Site A
CampusDesign
ReinforcestheWestSideofCampus
SmallestSiteArea
GatewaytoCampus
DramaticViewstotheWest
TransportationFactors
ClosureofSouthDrive
HistoricAthleticTrafficonShieldsStreet
20MinWalktoBRT/ClosertoStudentHousing
ProposedParkingGaragetotheNorthwest
ShieldsandLaurelStreet
SiteFactors
GroundwaterIssues(CommontoAllSites)
UtilityRelocation
Cost&Timing
Cost/TimingofRelocationofTwoResidenceHalls
NeighborhoodImpact
WestResidentialNeighborhoodImpact
RezoningtoNOTallowParkingonStreets&Yards
onGameDay
Site A
August 9, 2012
6
Site Selecton
Site B
Site B
CampusDesign
SouthernCampusFrontDoorExperience
RemotefromotherCampusUses
CloserproximitytoExistingCampusParking
1520MinWalkfromBRT
DisplacesExistingParking
SiteFactors
LowerSite/BuildingReplacementCost
Cost&Timing
DisplacementofExistingParkingLots
RelocationofGreenhouses&AgriculturePlots
NeighborhoodImpact
SouthResidentialNeighborhoodImpact
RezoningtoNOTallowParkingnoStreets&Yards
onGameDay
August 9, 2012
7
Site Selecton
Site C
Site C
CampusDesign
DefinesanEdgetoSouthCampus
CreatesanEntranceCorridor
StrongConnectiontoFutureUniversityWalkat
MeridianAvenuebacktoCampus
CentraltoExistingCampusParking
DisplacesExistingParking
SiteFactors
LowerSite/BuildingReplacementCost
Cost&Timing
DisplacementofExistingParkingLots
RelocationofGreenhouses&AgriculturePlots
NeighborhoodImpact
RezoningtoNOTAllowParkingonStreetsand
YardsonGameDay
August 9, 2012
8
Site Selecton
Site D
Site D
CampusDesign
IntheCoreandOpentoCampusGreen
ConnectiontoMeridianAvenuePedestrianMall
StadiumasBridgeBetweenAcademic&
Housing/Recreation/Athletics
CentraltoParking/BRT
ClosetoProposedGarageSouthofPitkin
SiteFactors
ReplacementofResidenceHalland
Office/AcademicBuilding Timing/Cost
Cost&Timing
DisplacementofOneResidenceHallandOne
Office/AcademicBuilding
RealignmentofPitkinStreet
NeighborhoodImpact
MoreCentralLocationonCampushasless
NeighborhoodImpact.
GreaterAbilitytoMitigateIssues
August 9, 2012
9
Site Selecton
Site E
Site E
CampusDesign
IntegrationofStadium/Campus
MovingPeopleThroughCampus
ReconnectingAlumniwithColleges
ClosetoBRT&EastParkingLots/
CenterAvenueGarage
SiteFactors
FurthestfromStudentHousing/WestParking
SeismicIssuesDuringConstructionrelated
toAcademicBuildings
Cost&Timing
Displacement/RelocationofAcademicBuildings
HighestCosttoRelocateAcademyBuildings&
SubStation
NeighborhoodImpact
MoreCentralLocationonCampushasless
NeighborhoodImpact.
GreaterAbilitytoMitigateIssues
August 9, 2012
10
Site Selecton
Site F
Site F
CampusDesign
IntegrationofStadiumintoTraditional
CampusGateway CompletingtheGateway
DefinitionAlongCentreAvenueandProspect
ExtendthePedestrianCore
DirectAccesstoCenterAvenueGarage
PlannedFutureGarage
SiteFactors
FurthestfromStudentHousing/WestParking
Displacement/RelocationofMarriedHousing
RealignmentofProspectRoad
Cost&Timing
RealignmentofProspectRoad
CityPlanning/Timing
NeighborhoodImpact
RezoningtoNOTAllowparkingonStreets&Yards
onGameDay
August 9, 2012
11
Site Selecton
Site Criteria
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY ON CAMPUS STADIUM
SITE EVALUATION STUDY
SITE RANKINGS MATRIX
A Campus Design
B Transportation Factors
C Site Factors
D Cost and Economic Factors
E Timing Factors
F Neighborhood Impact
Adequate Site Area, Conguration and Orientation
Design Potential Related to Framework of the Campus
Fan Experience
Visibility
Vehicular Access
Pedestrian Circulation
Public Transportation
Parking Quantity
Parking Proximity
Site Characteristics which inuence design & cost
Subsurface Conditions
Utility Infrastructure
Environmental Considerations
Highest and Best Use
Facility Design Considerations
Displacement and Relocation
Site Impact Costs
Stadium / University Revenue Generating Opportunities
Property Availability and Relocation
Approvals
Restrictions / Permitting
Safety, Security and Public Perception
City Approval
Parking Congestion & Impact
OVERALL TOTAL
OVERALL RANK
Site A - Shields St Site Site B - West Lake Street
Site C - West Lake St. &
Meridian Avenue
Site D - Pitkin St. &
Meridian Avenue
Site E - Pitkin Street -
Academic campus
Site F - Prospect Road &
Centre Ave.
August 9, 2012
12
Site Selecton
B C D Site Graphic
colorado state university
MAIN CAMPUS
POTENTIAL STADIUM LOCATIONS
SITE SELECTION/ MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE FINDINGS, MARCH 16, 2012
Recreation District
Housing District
Academic District
College
Avenue
District
Housing
District
Open Park
Sub-District
CAMPUS BOUNDARY
12 ACRE ZONE
Historic
Sub-District
3
-
2
9
-
2
0
1
2
12 12
B
D
C
B
N
S
F

1
0
0

R
.
O
.
W
.
S
H
I
E
L
D
S

S
T
R
E
E
T
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
O
U
T
H

C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
M
A
S
O
N

S
T
R
E
E
T
UNIVERSITY AVENUE
WEST LAKE STREET
WEST LAKE STREET
PROSPECT ROAD
PITKIN STREET
SOUTH DRIVE
PLUM STREET
LAUREL STREET
PITKIN STREET
NATIONAL
CENTER FOR
GENETIC
RESOURCE
PRESERVATION
N
0 75 150 300
August 9, 2012
13
Site Selecton
Site Plan Phase 1
F
O
R

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

O
N
L
Y

-

N
O
T

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Scale 1 = 100-0
50 100 200
N
0
A. Football Stadium
B. Alumni/Welcome
Center
C. New 1,551 Space
Parking Garage
D. PERC
E. Meridian Walk of
Colleges
- Plazas
- Softscape
- Boulders
- Festival Space
- Lighting
- Bio-Swales
- Alumni Donor
Walk
- Colleges Walk/
Plaza

F. New University
Gateway Boulevard
- Specialty Paving
- Stones/Boulders
- Lighting
- Graphics
- Landscape
Site Improvements
A
B
C
D
E
F
PITKIN STREET
SOUTH DRIVE
E
L
L
I
S

D
R
I
V
E
WEST LAKE STREET
UNIVERSITY AVENUE
PERC
STADIUM DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT - PHASE 1

- STADIUM
- NEW GATEWAY BLVD.
- NEW MERIDIAN WALK OF COLLEGES
TO SOUTH DRIVE
ALUMNI CENTER PROJECT
- INTEGRATED INTO SOUTH
ENDZONE OF STADIUM
B
R
A
I
D
E
N

D
R
I
V
E
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PHASE 1
SD1-01
August 9, 2012
14
Site Selecton
Site Plan Phase 2
F
O
R

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

O
N
L
Y

-

N
O
T

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Scale 1 = 100-0
50 100 200
N
0
FUTURE PHASE MERIDIAN
WALK OF COLLEGES
- PEDESTRIAN N-S CORRIDOR CONNECTING
CAMPUS AND STADIUM
- MAINTAIN PARKING #S
PARKING MERIDIAN
FUTURE PHASE
North of South Drive
(Health Ctr)
128 -Commuter
36 -Meridian parallel
pkg
164 TOTAL
PROPOSED SPACES
164 -Reconfgured Parking
& Meridian Walk
(Commuter)
164 TOTAL
PITKIN STREET
SOUTH DRIVE
B
R
A
I
D
E
N

D
R
I
V
E
E
L
L
I
S

D
R
I
V
E
WEST LAKE STREET
UNIVERSITY AVENUE
PERC
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PHASE 2
MERIDIAN WALK
SD2-01
August 9, 2012
15
Site Selecton
Site Plan Phase 3
F
O
R

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

O
N
L
Y

-

N
O
T

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Scale 1 = 100-0
50 100 200
N
0
FUTURE PHASE RAMS TOWN

- HOUSING
- ACADEMIC
- OFFICES
- RETAIL
PITKIN STREET
SOUTH DRIVE
B
R
A
I
D
E
N

D
R
I
V
E
E
L
L
I
S

D
R
I
V
E
WEST LAKE STREET
UNIVERSITY AVENUE
PERC
CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE PHASE
SD3-01
August 9, 2012
16
Site Selecton
Collecton of Phases
F
O
R

R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E

O
N
L
Y

-

N
O
T

F
O
R

C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
FIRST PHASE MERIDIAN WALK OF COLLEGES
- NEXT PHASE
CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT
- NEXT PHASE
SD4-00
DEVELOPMENT
PHASING PLANS
August 9, 2012
17
Site Selecton
Transportaton Narratve
Design Narrative COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY NEW STADIUM FEASIBILITY STUDY

August 9, 2012 1

I. PB- Parking and Transportation Narrative (Overview, Maps & Pricing)
Introduction
This transportation feasibility study is the result of a collaborative effort of meetings, discussions and exchanges
of information between Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) and the following entities: Colorado State University (CSU
or University) (Parking Department, Facilities Management Department, Athletic Department, and the
University Architect), the City of Fort Collins, Colorado (Traffic Operations Department, Parking Services
Department, and Transportation Budget Manager), and the Colorado Department of Transportation Safety and
Traffic Engineering Branch. In addition, PB participated in public meetings on July 26 and July 30 for residents of
some of the neighborhoods adjacent to the proposed site of the multi-purpose, on-campus stadium at CSU. As
noted below, the CSU Transportation Management Plan will be a living document that provides the basic
program for managing parking and minimizing traffic congestion, maintaining the integrity of the neighborhoods
and promoting alternative modes of transportation. The elements of the Plan will require the review of and
coordination with CSU, the City of Fort Collins, and the Colorado Department of Transportation.
Transportation Feasibility Study
This Transportation Feasibility Study is part of a 90-day effort to determine if there are any major traffic and
parking issues that would preclude the construction of a multi-purpose stadium on the CSU Campus with 42,000
seats.
There are a series of questions that the study will investigate:
1. Is there enough CSU controlled parking to accommodate the demand?
2. Are there opportunities for privately-owned parking to reduce the demand on CSU?
3. Are there sufficient alternative modes of transportation to reduce traffic and parking demand?
4. Does the roadway network have enough carrying capacity to accommodate traffic surges?
In order to answer these and other related transportation and neighborhood questions, we have reviewed the
on-campus stadium in the context of the development of a transportation management plan. A transportation
management plan takes into account all modes of transportation, parking supply and demand, options to reduce
vehicular travel and neighborhood infringement.
Collectively, the implementation of the transportation management techniques recommended in this study will
assist the event patrons in having an efficient transportation experience when attending a sporting event or
other event at the on-campus, multi-purpose stadium at CSU.
Transportation Management Plan Overview
The purpose of this CSU Stadium Transportation Management Plan Overview is to provide the basic framework
of the transportation system that will be developed and refined over the next years for the new multi-purpose
on-campus stadium at CSU.

August 9, 2012 2

There are many challenges associated with relocating a suburban-type event, with a capacity of 32,000, into an
urban campus setting in a facility with 42,000 seats. There are also many benefits to a well thought-out and
collaborative transportation management plan. A positive game-day transportation experience encourages
parents, alumni, and visitors to return to CSU and attend other events at the new stadium.
The primary objectives of the proposed Transportation Management Plan are to provide the highest level of
public safety, minimize congestion, and promote the use of alternative modes of transportation. These
objectives have been successfully incorporated into transportation management plans that the consultant team
has developed for stadiums on other university campuses and for professional sports venues.
Managing Parking and Traffic Congestion
In order to minimize the hunt and peck phenomenon (cars driving around looking for a place to park), which
contributes to traffic congestion, the pre-selling of some of the parking for events on campus (and possibly off-
campus) should be considered and access routes to and from that event parking will be provided. Local access
routes should be coordinated with the City of Fort Collins Traffic Department and regional highway access will
be updated with the Colorado Department of Transportation. All staffing and enforcement will be coordinated
with CSU and the City of Fort Collins.
As noted in Transportation Figure T-1, there are 3 primary highway exits from I-25 into the City of Fort Collins: E.
Harmony Road, Prospect Street and Mulberry Street. Developing strategies to utilize existing roadway capacity
will be a critical element in the development of a plan.
The state highways in Fort Collins are US 287 (College Avenue), SH 14 (Mulberry Street/Riverside
Avenue/Jefferson Street/College Avenue), and SH 392 (Carpenter Road) while Shields, Horsetooth and
Timberline are county roads. The City of Fort Collins controls the traffic and signaling timings along these
corridors. Because these primary access corridors have different agency ownership, the implementation of any
transportation management techniques related to these corridors will require review and approval by the
appropriate agency and the City of Fort Collins.

Maintaining the Integrity of Local Neighborhoods
Unwarranted parking in neighborhoods and uninvited traffic will be discouraged though a comprehensive
system of event attendee awareness/education, residential permits, updated zoning, game-day signage, and law
enforcement.
Promoting Alternative Modes of Transportation
The use of mass transit, park and ride, shuttles, and bicycles will play a major role the CSU Transportation
Management Plan.
In addition, the use of technology to inform and educate the traveling public will play a major role in
implementing the proposed Transportation Management Plan.

August 9, 2012
18
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 3

Transportation Management Plan
Hughes Stadium currently seats 32,000 patrons and has over 10,000 adjacent parking spaces. According to the
University, 10,000 tickets are reserved by CSU for students for each game. There is minimal use of the campus
shuttle and minimal walking to the game due to the proximity of the residential student base (approximately 3
miles from the main campus). The demand for parking rarely exceeds the 10,000 space supply. The stadium
attendance varies per game depending on the teams opponent, the teams performance, and the weather
conditions on the day of the game.
The University reports that 36% of students, 25% of faculty and 15% of staff commute by bike to campus daily.
Therefore, given the proximity of the on-campus University housing and the close proximity to the off-campus
University housing, a 20% to 30% estimate for walkers and bicyclists to an on-campus stadium is a reasonable
range for assessment.
Transportation Goals and Assumptions
The new Stadium is to have 42,000 seats. A parking demand analysis was conducted using two techniques and
the results were found to be within a few hundred spaces of each other. The more detailed approach is
presented and identifies transportation goals that can be further refined during development of the
Transportation Management Plan. As a conservative approach, the low end of all of the transportation modal
split assumptions has been used to develop the following parking demand:
Modal Split % of Patrons # Patrons
Walkers and Bicycles* 20% to 30% 8,400 to 12,600
Mason Street Corridor 3% to 5% 1,260 to 2,100
Existing Transit System Transfort** 0% to 1% 0 to 420
Shuttles from shopping/restaurant areas 0% to 2% 0 to 840
Remote Park and Ride 0% to 2% 0 to 840
Modal Split Goals 23% to 40% 9,660 to 16,800***
Patrons requiring University parking support 32,340 to 25,200
* CSU reports 36 % of students, 25% of faculty and 15% of staff commute by bike to campus
**CSU students accounts for nearly 35% of Transfort ridership
*** The University currently reserves 10,000 tickets for students.
Vehicular Occupancy
The vehicular occupancy typically used for college football sports venues is 3.0 to 3.2 people per vehicle.


August 9, 2012 4

Parking Demand
Modal Split
Vehicular Occupancy 32,340 25,200
3.0 10,780 8,400
3.2 10,106 7,875
From the results of our Parking Demand analysis, we estimate a demand of between 7,875 vehicles and 10,780
vehicles. For purposes of this study, we will use a conservative approach in the supply and demand assessment.
This approach results in a maximum parking demand of 10,780 passenger vehicles. This number does not take
into account the parking demand or vehicular occupancy for buses from other universities, shuttles or other
forms of transport.
Parking Supply
CSU provided a detailed breakdown of all University-controlled parking. There are approximately 10,395 Core
Campus Parking spaces and 2,635 Off-Campus Parking Spaces for a total of 13,030 University-controlled
automobile parking spaces. There are also approximately 545 motorcycle parking spaces.
The 13,030 University-controlled parking number does not include possible parking inventory in the South
Campus (see below). The highest number of cars parked during the 2011-12 football season was 9,556 for the
November 15 Boise State game. Not all parking owned and/or operated by the University will be available for
events, so future analysis will be necessary to further identify the number and location of spaces that will be
available for events.
Event Parking Model (EPM)
The following CSU Event Parking Model is only a baseline from which to conduct further analysis. It is
acknowledged that games at the stadium will occur on weekends and weeknight and the varied event
schedule will overlap with existing parking requirements on the campus and impact parking availability.
The CSU Event Parking Model looks at parking spaces within a 20 minute walk of the new stadium and is based
on linear walk paths at a walking speed of 3.5 feet per second. The CSU Parking Model also groups parking into
the major categories of parking permits. The CSU Parking model currently does not take into account parking
"availability," but instead documents the maximum number of spaces potentially available; further analysis is
required to identify which lots will be available on gameday. As the EPM progresses and the parking dynamics
of the campus are documented, a refinement will be made as to parking availability for each lot. For example,
small parking lots due to their size and location may not be efficient for pre-selling. These areas may be set aside
for the faculty and staff who need to be on the campus during normal weekend or evening activities. The
Stadium Site C parking assessment indicates that there are approximately 8,976 spaces within a 20-minute walk
of the Stadium C site. The detailed back-up is provided in a supplemental document. This number already takes
into account 1,755 parking spaces that will be displaced by the new Stadium (1,557 commuter student, 127
Faculty/Staff, and 71 Student Housing).

Design Narrative COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY NEWSTADIUMFEASIBILITY STUDY
August 9, 2012 3
Transportation Management Plan Hughes Stadium currently seats 32,000 patrons and has over 10,000 adjacent parking spaces. According to the University, 10,000 tickets are reserved by CSU for students for each game. There is minimal use of the campus shuttle and minimal walking to the game due to the proximity of the residential student base (approximately 3 miles from the main campus). The demand for parking rarely exceeds the 10,000 space supply. The stadium attendance varies per game depending on the teams opponent, the teams performance, and the weather conditions on the day of the game. The University reports that 36% of students, 25% of faculty and 15% of staff commute by bike to campus daily. Therefore, given the proximity of the on-campus University housing and the close proximity to the off-campus University housing, a 20% to 30% estimate for walkers and bicyclists to an on-campus stadium is a reasonable range for assessment. Transportation Goals and Assumptions The new Stadium is to have 42,000 seats. A parking demand analysis was conducted using two techniques and the results were found to be within a few hundred spaces of each other. The more detailed approach is presented and identifies transportation goals that can be further refined during development of the Transportation Management Plan. As a conservative approach, the low end of all of the transportation modal split assumptions has been used to develop the following parking demand: Modal Split % of Patrons # Patrons Walkers and Bicycles* 20% to 30% 8,400 to 12,600 Mason Street Corridor 3% to 5% 1,260 to 2,100 Existing Transit System Transfort** 0% to 1% 0 to 420 Shuttles fromshopping/restaurant areas 0% to 2% 0 to 840 Remote Park and Ride 0% to 2% 0 to 840 Modal Split Goals 23%to 40% 9,660 to 16,800*** Patrons requiring University parking support 32,340 to 25,200 * CSU reports 36 % of students, 25% of faculty and 15% of staff commute by bike to campus **CSU students accounts for nearly 35% of Transfort ridership *** The University currently reserves 10,000 tickets for students. Vehicular Occupancy The vehicular occupancy typically used for college football sports venues is 3.0 to 3.2 people per vehicle.
August 9, 2012
19
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 5

Parking Supply (100% Availability
1
) within 20-Minute Walk of the Stadium Site C
2
Student/Resident Parking 3,773
Commuter Student 2,700
Faculty/Staff 2,459
Other 1,799
Commuter Students displaced (1,755)
Total Net 8,976
1
Actual availability will be determined in future analysis and this preliminary analysis will be updated
2
Parking Supply data from CSU Main Campus Parking Inventory Map (3-29-12)
Additional Parking Supply
The Stadium Program assumes that a 1,551-car parking garage will be built west of the Stadium site, 104 on-
street spaces will be built on the new Whitcomb Street Extension east of the Stadium site, and 130 spaces will
be reconfigured in the Meridian Walk area, so 1,785 new spaces will be built to replace the 1,755 parking spaces
being displaced. The new parking spaces will be included in the New Parking Space Total.
After further investigation with CSU representatives, the preferred parking garage approach is the construction
of two parking garages to support the multi-purpose stadium: one garage with 800 spaces adjacent to the
stadium (the Pitkin location as identified in CSUs Master Plan) and another garage with 751 spaces located at
the intersection of Prospect and Whitcomb as identified in CSUs Master Plan.
The University currently has a Request for Proposals from Developers to construct a mixed use development
with a 1,200 car parking garage on the surface lot at the corner of Shields Street and W. Laurel Street.
Approximately 500 parking spaces will be displaced for a potential net gain of 700 spaces at this location. Future
discussions will determine the availability of these spaces in conjunction with the Laurel Street mixed-use
project. The schedule, funding and composition of this proposed facility will be determined in the future. Other
sites identified by CSU for future parking are discussed later.
New Parking Space Total
Current Net Total 8,976
New Stadium Garage 1,551
New On-Street (Whitcomb St. Extension) 104
New Reconfigured Parking (Meridian Walk Area) 130
Shields and Laurel Garage (Net) 700
Total Parking Spaces 11,461

University-Owned Property

During meetings with CSU Parking and Facilities, we were informed that there are two University-owned parcels
of land in the South Campus that can be considered as potential parking areas for stadium events. Both parcels
are within a 20 minute walk of the proposed stadium site.

August 9, 2012 6

The first parcel contains 20 acres of what is now flood control area. This parcel is located east of Central Avenue
and is proposed as future playing fields in the CSU South Campus Master plan. The land has a restriction for use
between April 15 and September 15 due to potential flooding, but may be available for parking in support of the
stadium through a permitting process. It is estimated that at least 1,000 to 1,500 vehicles can be parked on this
parcel of land, but we have taken a conservative estimate of 1,000 vehicles. It should be noted that some
universities, including Vanderbilt University, have used playing fields to accommodate parking for special
occasions.

The second parcel is located just south of the above 20 acre site and is currently used as an office park that
contains 1,000 parking spaces. The office park is currently leased to the Federal Government and a modification
to the lease would be required in order for the University to park vehicles on the site for special events.
Based on the above, we have identified an additional 2,000 spaces that could be considered additional inventory
to the University-controlled parking inventory and used for football games and events at the stadium.
Just outside the 20 minute walk zone, there is additional property in the South Campus that can also be
considered as a potential parking resource and should be investigated if the stadium project is approved.
First Assessment of CSU Event Parking Model
From the results of our Parking Demand analysis, we estimate there will be a maximum parking demand of
10,780 vehicles. From the results of the Parking Supply analysis (assuming 100% parking availability), we
estimate there will be an on-campus supply of 11,461 spaces, as shown in Transportation Figure T-2. The first
assessment of our Parking Supply versus Demand assessment informs us that there is enough parking supply on
the campus to accommodate the demand and the new stadium location will not result in being thousands of
parking spaces short. Because not all University parking will be available for events, future analysis is required
to identify possible off-campus and remote parking locations to satisfy the parking demand. For example, as
seen in Figure T-3, there are 3,773 resident spaces and many of these spaces may not be available for special
events. However, we also have a potential parking supply in the South Campus of over 2,000 spaces that can be
added to our inventory to offset any parking that must be maintained on-campus.
Subject to the Universitys management of on-campus residential and stadium event parking, the above totals
for parking supply and parking demand demonstrate that there is sufficient on-campus, University-controlled
parking. In order to provide flexibility to the parking supply, the University should consider the parking
possibilities in the South Campus and develop a program to organize and pre-sell parking in a very structured
way. The concept of pre-selling parking to as many event patrons as possible will help manage parking supply
and minimize the hunt and peck method to finding parking spaces. Pre-selling parking and providing access
routes also has a positive secondary impact by minimizing congestion and reducing unwarranted infringement
into the neighborhoods.
If the stadium project is approved, the advancement of these Transportation Management Plan components will
provide a much more detailed assessment of transportation for various types of events, including parking supply
(who may be able to be temporarily displaced off campus to other University-owned property), parking
August 9, 2012
20
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 7

availability (who needs to be on campus during event time periods), increased transit ridership, the use of
shuttles and patron education and communication.
Transportation Management Plan Components
The following Transportation Management Plan (TMP) components are presented as a review of the elements
of the TMP that will be investigated in detail if the stadium project moves forward.
Parking Availability
Parking demand on campus during events has two components: (a) the faculty, staff and students who need to
be on campus and (b) the event patrons and support personnel. A detailed review to establish those
requirements will be conducted.
Additionally, the Parking Inventory will be reviewed to determine which lots should be pre-sold to event
patrons. Not all parking is considered good or satisfactory event parking, especially since we are trying to reduce
traffic congestion by pre-selling parking and providing convenient travel routes to and from the patrons points
of departure to the applicable parking lot.
Campus Parking During Events at the Multi-Purpose Stadium
A series of reviews and meetings will be held to determine the most effective and efficient method of
addressing on-campus parking during events at the stadium to allow the functionality of non-stadium events on
campus.
Visiting University Parking
A location for visiting University dignitaries and event patrons parking needs to be determined. The visiting
university parking demand will vary per game.
CSU Alumni Donor Parking
CSU currently sets aside Donor Parking for Blue, Gold, Green and Red categories. Our review of the 2011-12
season indicates that at a minimum 1,400 donor parking spaces need to be set aside. That number is likely to
increase in the future as the stadium size grows and new suite and club amenities are added; estimated increase
and potential parking locations will be identified in follow-up work.
CSU Future Parking
As part of the 2012 CSU Master Plan update, five potential university parking locations were identified for new
parking structures. One site, the surface parking lot at the corner of Shields Street and W. Laurel, is slated for
development with a 1,200 car parking garage. At this time, it is unclear whether the University will have
agreements with the developer to provide some spaces for special events, such as sporting events or
graduation. We have assumed that this site has a net gain of approximately 700 spaces after existing surface
parking is displaced for the structure, but this number will need to be adjusted in the future consistent with the
final agreement between CSU and the developer.

August 9, 2012 8

Another garage site identified in the CSU Master Plan is located at the intersection of Prospect Street and
Whitcomb Street, just southeast of the new stadium site. This site would provide approximately 751 spaces.
We suggest that a combination of the proposed on-site garage (Pitkin Street) and the garage at Prospect and
Whitcomb be programmed to account for the over 1,500 spaces being displaced by the proposed stadium. It is
strongly recommended that the University investigate options to build the garage at Prospect and Whitcomb as
soon as possible to support the new stadium.
The South Campus has the potential to be a major parking resource and will require further investigation.
Tailgating
A review of the definition of tailgating will occur and special areas may be set aside for open fires versus cooler
type activities. All tailgating activities will be reviewed with public safety officials for compliance with Federal,
State, Local and Homeland Security guidelines.
Handicap Parking
Analysis will be done to determine the required number and location of handicap spaces relative to the new
stadium to meet ADA regulations.
Media Parking
Designated parking areas will be identified for regional and national media trucks and vans. This will be
determined in collaboration with the site design.
Pedestrian Circulation
Pedestrian circulation routes will be studied from parking locations (See Transportation Figure T-4), on-campus
dormitories (See Transportation Figure T-5), and off-campus apartments and neighborhoods to develop
strategies that minimize vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. Understanding the number of patrons walking from
different access corridors is important to:
Identify appropriate traffic control devices to provide a safe pedestrian environment during event
arrivals and departures
Determine if roadway links, such as Meridian Avenue, should be closed to vehicular traffic to
establish pedestrian corridors that support crow surges
Determine if there are locations where sidewalks should be widened or new sidewalks should be
constructed to support event pedestrian volumes
Coordinate with site planning to establish appropriate locations for pedestrian plazas and provide
sufficient entry gates
Determine appropriate locations for bus/shuttle stops
Determine locations for media, vendor, and service vehicle access and parking to minimize
interaction with pedestrian

August 9, 2012
21
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 9

Drop-off and Pick-up Area
Analysis will be done to determine the optimal location and size of short-term drop-off area relative to the new
stadium. We will also consider shuttle and bus circulation routes to drop-off and pick-up areas.
Vendor/Service Vehicle Access
Recommendations will be made relative to spaces needed in close proximity to the stadium for short-term
vendor delivery access.
Parking in Downtown Fort Collins
There is the opportunity to reduce on-campus parking demands by CSU partnering with local businesses in Ft.
Collins and promoting shuttles to campus. See Transportation Figure T-6 for a map of Downtown Ft. Collins
parking inventory. Local businesses may purchase blocks of tickets and/or offer parking spaces as part of ticket
package deals. Access can also be provided via the Mason Street Corridor Transit Line or the existing Transfort
Transit Bus system. Based on our meetings and discussions with the City of Fort Collins Parking Department, we
have identified approximately 5,599 parking spaces owned by the City of Fort Collins and approximately 5,500
privately-owned parking spaces that may be part of the parking inventory available to support a new stadium.
However, additional research is required to determine the actual availability of spaces in this inventory to
support a new stadium. We realize that not all of the parking will be available for a normal Saturday afternoon
or a Thursday evening stadium event. However, parking lots owned by the City of Fort Collins can be partnered
with local businesses for event patrons and there will be many entrepreneurial lots in businesses that are closed
on weekends or after 5:00PM during the week.
Entrepreneurial Parking Inventory
Based on our collegiate experience, there is also a category of entrepreneurial parking inventory that may
develop locally around the campus in businesses that are closed on weekends and evenings. This type of parking
inventory developed with the on-campus stadiums at the University of Louisville and Vanderbilt University. We
have estimated that this private parking source may generate between 1,000 to 2,500 spaces that should be
considered in the potential inventory of spaces.
Mason Corridor Transit
There is the opportunity to reduce on-campus parking demand by promoting the use of the Mason Street
Transit Corridor. New parking along the corridor of up to 515 is programmed:
South Transit Center - 175 spaces
Troutman Parkway 20 Public On-street spaces
Horsetooth Road - 30 to 50 spaces
Shallow Road - 50 spaces
Drake Road - 75 spaces
University Mall - 10 to 15 spaces
Downtown/City Garages - 125 spaces

August 9, 2012 10

A total of 485 to 515 new spaces (http://www.fcgov.com/mason/faqs.php) will be provided as part of this
project.
Current documentation on the Mason Street Transit Corridor indicates a rail capacity based on peak hour
ridership and does not considerer event surges. There is the opportunity to add more buses and increase the
headways to increase the transit demand for event surges. Additionally, there is the potential to allow private
bus carriers to use the Mason Street Corridor to supplement the Transit System. We have estimated 3% to 5 %
utilization of the Mason Street Corridor by event patrons.
Existing Transit System - Transfort
The City of Fort Collins has an existing public transit bus system called Transfort. There is the opportunity to
reduce on-campus parking demands by promoting ridership on the Transfort Bus System. There are currently 18
bus routes that serve the Fort Collins area and have bus transfer stations at CSU, the downtown Fort Collins area
at the old C&S Freight Deport and one serving the south area of the City at The Mall or Square area. CSU
students account for nearly 35% of Transfort ridership.
Shuttles from Shopping/Restaurant Areas
There is the opportunity to reduce on-campus parking demands by partnering with local businesses, especially
along the Harmony Street corridor and promote shuttles to campus.
Remote Park and Ride Locations
There is the opportunity to reduce on-campus parking demands by identifying park-and-ride locations both
locally, such as the Fort Collins Visitor's Center located in close proximity to I-25 and regionally, at the large
fairgrounds and shopping centers in the Denver area.
Traffic Management within Fort Collins
Traffic management in Fort Collins will consist of traffic signals that are pre-timed for event traffic, temporary
signage to direct patrons to the pre-sold parking lots, cones, barrels, barricades and other traffic control
measures. Consideration will also be given to reversible lanes of traffic on certain streets around the campus. All
traffic management measures will be coordinated with local fire, police and public safety officials.
Highway Traffic Management
There are 3 primary highway exits from I-25 into Fort Collins: E. Harmony Road, Prospect Street and Mulberry
Street. The new stadium will require an update to the highway signage and possible gameday Variable Message
Signage to prevent highway backup and congestion.
Shuttle Routes
As part of the Transportation Management Plan, specific shuttle routes will be determined in order to avoid the
random dropping off of patrons and the picking up of patrons after the game. Special consideration will be given
the amount of spaces required to queue up vehicles and people in an orderly manner.
August 9, 2012
22
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 11

Incident Management Locations
As part of the Transportation Management Plan, a study will be made to review the frequency of accidents, their
cause and develop consideration of where tow trucks and/or other traffic safety personnel should be located.
Emergency Response Routes
As part of the Transportation Management Plan, coordination will take place with public safety officials to
determine emergency response routes and comply with other Homeland Security directives.
Neighborhood Cooperation
One of the three goals identified for the CSU Transportation Management Plan is to maintain the integrity of the
local neighborhoods. This can be accomplished by minimizing/eliminating unwarranted parking in
neighborhoods and minimizing/eliminating uninvited traffic looking for a place to park. Issues like this have
successfully been mitigated through educating the public about acceptable parking options, establishing a
system of residential parking permits, updating zoning laws, providing gameday signage, and the vigilant use of
law enforcement.
Each adjacent neighborhood will have different issues that need to be addressed. Therefore, a series of
neighborhood meetings needs to begin to identify and address those issues. Ongoing community engagement
will continue on a periodic basis to assess neighborhood traffic and parking concerns after the new stadium is
opened.
Some issues that will be addressed include on-street parking that prevents residents from being able to park
near their homes, parking that encroaches on private lawns, parking in ways that block driveways and
residential street access, particularly for emergency vehicles.
The category of residential street access includes the temporary closing of street access to residents only or
guests, changing two-way streets to one-way streets, or changing the direction of one-way streets.
Local Street Improvements
From discussions with the City of Fort Collins Traffic Department, it was assumed that there will not be any right-
of-way acquisitions for roadway widening or for intersection redesign. The following list of roadway
improvements should be considered:
Additional Traffic Signal Heads for Turn Lanes of Traffic
Potential for Reversible Lanes of Traffic Near the University
Revisions to Pavement Markings
Wayfinding Signage to New Stadium Location
Wayfinding Signage to Event Parking
Signage in Neighborhoods
Signage in Campus Parking Lots

August 9, 2012 12

Interstate Highway Improvements
There will not be any new interchanges or interchange ramp widening. The following list of roadway highway
improvements will be considered.
New Highway Signage to Stadium
CCTV Signals at Ramps
Operational Costs
Operational costs will include payments for:
Transportation Management Plan Coordinator
Police at Intersections
Gameday Variable Message Signage
Temporary Gameday Signage
Cones, Barrels, Barricades
Web Site Design/Operation for Attendees' Purchases of Pre-paid parking
Some of these operating costs will be somewhat higher for the first few years until the organization of site
activities is finalized, given initial event feedback, and until alumni and other visitors become familiar with the
new pre-paid parking plan.
Estimated Costs
The following costs are estimated based on the elements described in the transportation management plan
overview.
Program Related Costs ($31.1M)
1,551 Car Parking Garage (1,551 spaces X$20K/space= $31M) or two garages of 751 spaces
(approximately $15M) and 800 spaces ($16M).
University Signage to new Stadium / Parking Garage($25K)
Parking Phone App & Web-Site for Gameday Parking Management($100K)
Signage in Campus Parking Lots($25K)
Local Street Improvements ($1.25M)
There will not be any right-of-way acquisition for roadway widening or for intersection redesign. The following
list of roadway improvements will be considered:
Additional Traffic Signal Heads for Turn Lanes of Traffic (4@25K=100K)
Potential for Reversible Lanes of Traffic Near the University (Prospect & Mulberry $250K each =
$500K)
August 9, 2012
23
Site Selecton

August 9, 2012 13

Revisions to Pavement Markings ($25K)
Wayfinding Signage to New Stadium Location ($50K)
Wayfinding Signage to Event Parking ($50K)
Signage in Neighborhoods ($25K)
CCTV at City Intersections (20@25K = $500K)
Interstate Highway Improvements ($200K)
There will not be any new interchanges or interchange ramp widening. The following list of roadway highway
improvements will be considered:
New Highway Signage to Stadium ($50K)
CCTV Signals at Ramps (6@$25K= $150K)
Operational Costs
Operational costs will include payments for:
Transportation Management Plan Coordinator
Police at Intersections
Gameday Variable Message Signage
Temporary Gameday Signage
Cones, Barrels, Barricades
Web Site Design/Operation for Attendees' Purchases of Pre-paid parking

Conclusion
The transportation challenges of building a new on-campus multi-purpose facility with 42,000 seats can be
managed with the development of a comprehensive Transportation Management Plan.
The results of our 90-day study indicate that CSU controls parking inventory sufficient to meet the stadium
parking demand, but CSU should consider partnering with local businesses and businesses in downtown Fort
Collins to provide additional parking in order to minimize the shifting on-campus parking for football games or
sellout events. There appears to be ample off-campus parking that patrons can use in conjunction with the local
Transfort public transit system and the new Mason Street Corridor transit line that will support this
transportation management system approach.
There are sufficient alternative modes of transportation that can reduce the traffic and parking demand, but
additional research is required in this area. Additionally, we have considered the technique of pre-selling parking
and providing predetermined access routes to and from parking in order to reduce the hunt and peck method
of looking for a space and minimize unwarranted infringement in the local neighborhoods. The current roadway
network has sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic surges related to events at a new stadium, but it is

August 9, 2012 14

critical that the City of Fort Collins, CSU, and all other applicable agencies review and approve a final
transportation strategy.
The CSU Transportation Management Plan will be a living document that provides the basic program for
managing parking and minimizing traffic congestion, maintaining the integrity of the neighborhoods and
promoting alternatives modes of transportation.
If the new on-campus multi-purpose stadium project moves forward, the transportation elements identified in
this document will be reviewed by and coordinated with the University, City of Fort Collins, and Colorado
Department of Transportation to understand the impacts on CSU, identify opportunities within the Fort Collins
community, and to develop strategies to manage game-day traffic and parking.
August 9, 2012
24
Site Selecton
Transportaton Maps
HARMONY RD.
MULBERRY ST.
MOUNTAIN AVE.
LAUREL ST.
UNIVERSITY AVE.
BAY FARM RD.
DRAKE RD.
SWALLOW RD.
HORSETOOTH RD.
TROUTMAN PKWY
OLIVE ST.
1
-M
IL
E

R
A
D
IU
S
2
-M
IL
E

R
A
D
IU
S
3
-M
IL
E

R
A
D
IU
S
PROSPECT ST.
4
-M
IL
E

R
A
D
IU
S
5
-M
IL
E

R
A
D
IU
S
LEGEND
INTERSTATE ACCESS ROUTES
MASON CORRIDOR
MASON CORRIDOR STOP LOCATION
MASON CORRIDOR STOP W/ PARKING
DISTANCE FROM SITE C
MAIN CAMPUS
DOWNTOWN FORT COLLINS
DOWNTOWN
TRANSIT CENTER
SOUTH TRANSIT
CENTER P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
S
H
A
R
P
P
O
IN
T
R
D
.
S
H
IE
L
D
S
S
T
.
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
.
SITE C
PB AMERICAS, INC.
75 Arlington St., 9th Fl
Boston, MA 02116
FIG NO. PREPARED BY:
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT
IN ASSOCIATION WITH POPULOUS
ACCESS ROUTES
There are currently three exits from I-25 that
provide access to Colorado State University Main
Campus and Downtown Fort Collins; these exits are
at Mulberry Street, Prospect Street, and Harmony
Road.
Mulberry Street provides two eastbound and two
westbound lanes with a center left turn lane.
Prospect Street provides one eastbound and one
westbound lane between the interstate and Sharp
Point Road and two eastbound and two westbound
lanes between Sharp Point Road and the campus.
and Harmony Road provides three eastbound and
three westbound lanes with turn lanes.
In addition to vehicular access to the proposed
on-campus sites, the Mason Street Corridor Bus
Rapid Transit (BRT) Line, is a five-mile, north-south
busway that also serves the campus area. Six
60-foot articulated vehicles are being purchased,
each with a maximum load of 80 patrons. Parking is
planned at the following locations:
Downtown/City Garages- 125 Spaces
University Mall- 10 to 15 Spaces
Drake Road- 75 Spaces
Swallow Road- 50 Spaces
Horsetooth Rd- 30 to 55 spaces
Troutman Pkwy- 20 Public On-Street Spaces
South Transit Center- 175 Spaces
TOTAL: 485-515 SPACES
(Data from www.fcgov.com/mason/faqs.php)
ACCESS ROUTES
SITE C
7/25/12
T-1
August 9, 2012
25
Site Selecton
Transportaton Maps
110
115
195
130
135
140 145
165 172
170
310
315
305
320
354
350349
325
327
330
335
345
440
444
452
445
625
620 617
215 220 230
470
240
245
505
515 520
580 581
570
540
535
547
455
412
415
420 425
190
180
332
575
464
410
111
53 31
546
334
23
100
196
39
30
232
10
74 74
189
205
458 894
165 226 156 204
220
128
11
58
133
22
45 42
22
81
94
7
57
16
48 542
54
19
18
34
140 169
22
179 128
435
77
908
25
41
867
352
123
65
210
319
610
605 612
634 633
79 86
630
97
UNIVERSITY AVE
W LAUREL ST.
NORTH AVE.
M
E
R
ID
IA
N
A
V
E
.
S
S
H
IE
L
D
S
S
T
.
W MYRTLE ST.
SOUTH DR.
W PITKIN ST.
C
E
N
T
R
E
A
V
E
.
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
.
R
E
M
IN
G
T
O
N
S
T
.
W LAKE ST.
W PROSPECT ST.
159
38 20
143
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
2
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
560
451 53
34
258
236/
246
71
475
127
310
SITE C
67
Federal Office Complex
1,000
Flood Control Area (20 ac)
1,000
LEGEND
STUDENT/RESIDENT PARKING
COMMUTER STUDENT PARKING
FACULTY PARKING
OTHER/PUBLIC PARKING
UNKNOWN PARKING LOCATION
PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE
WALK RADIUS
PROPOSED STADIUM SITE
PARKING LOT ID
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES XX
XX
PB AMERICAS, INC.
Boston, MA 02116
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT
Site C-
The following table describes the parking supply,
assuming 100% availability of University Parking.
Further analysis will determine the likelihood of lots
being available on gameday.
The estimated full capacity inventory of future
campus parking within a 20-minute walk of the
stadium is 11,461 parking spaces.
An estimated 1,755 parking spaces will be
displaced by the stadium location. although the
proposed site plan has identified 1,785 new on-site
parking spaces (1,551 structured parking spaces
and 234 surface parking spaces).
Parking Supply Summary:
Existing Parking Supply
Site C
7/25/12
T-2
Further analysis will determine the size and location
of structured parking; either one or two structures
are proposed to accommodate up to 1,600 spaces.
In addition to the existing inventory of on-campus
parking the University also owns property in the
South Campus southeast of the proposed site. The
20 acre Flood Control Area (future playing fields)
can accommodate approximately 1,000-1,500
parking spaces and the Federal Office Complex can
accommodate approximately 1,000 parking spaces.
Other University owned property can be evaluated
for shared-use parking in the future.
August 9, 2012
26
Site Selecton
Transportaton Maps
115
435
UNIVERSITY AVE
W LAUREL ST.
NORTH AVE.
M
E
R
ID
IA
N
A
V
E
.
S
S
H
IE
L
D
S
S
T
.
W MYRTLE ST.
SOUTH DR.
W PITKIN ST.
C
E
N
T
R
E
A
V
E
.
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
.
R
E
M
IN
G
T
O
N
S
T
.
W LAKE ST.
W PROSPECT ST.
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
2
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
LEGEND
WALK RADIUS
PARKING LOT ID
XX
SITE C
195
135
145
180
165
170
625
580 581
634 633
470
410
230
210
215 220
245
236/
246
908
179
65
169
140
34
204 156 226
165
71
220 58
319
74 74
86 79
111
PB AMERICAS, INC.
Boston, MA 02116
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT
Site C
Residential Student Parking Supply Summary:
There are currently 3,773 on-campus residential
parking spaces. Of these, one lot (Lot 236) would
be impacted by the proposed stadium site. The 71
spaces at Newsom/Meridian in Lot 236 would be
replaced by reconfiguring parking to allow for 130
new parking spaces in the Meridian Walk area.
Site C- Resident/Student Parking
7/25/12
T-3
August 9, 2012
27
Site Selecton
Transportaton Maps
110
115
195
130
135
140 145
165 172
170
310
315
305
320
354
350349
325
327
330
335
345
440
444
452
445
625
620 617
215 220 230
470
240
245
505
515 520
580 581
570
540
535
547
455
412
415
420 425
190
180
332
575
464
410
111
53 31
546
334
23
100
196
39
30
232
10
74 74
189
205
458
894
165 226 156 204
220
128
11
58
133
22
45 42
22
81
94
7
57
16
48 542
54
19
18
34
140 169
22
179 128
435
77
908
25
41
867
352
123
65
210
319
610
605 612
634 633
79 86
630
97
UNIVERSITY AVE
W LAUREL ST.
NORTH AVE.
M
E
R
ID
IA
N
A
V
E
.
S
S
H
IE
L
D
S
S
T
.
W MYRTLE ST.
SOUTH DR.
W PITKIN ST.
C
E
N
T
R
E
A
V
E
.
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
.
R
E
M
IN
G
T
O
N
S
T
.
W LAKE ST.
W PROSPECT ST.
159
38 20
143
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
1
5
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
2
0
-
M
IN
W
A
L
K
560
451
53
34
258
236/
246
71
475
127
310
SITE C
LEGEND
COMMUTER STUDENT PARKING
FACULTY PARKING
OTHER/PUBLIC PARKING
UNKNOWN PARKING LOCATION
PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE
WALK RADIUS
PARKING LOT ID
XX
67
Federal Office Complex
1,000
Flood Control Area (20 ac)
1,000
PB AMERICAS, INC.
Boston, MA 02116
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT
Site C-
The following represents the parking distribution of
existing University parking relative to the proposed
stadium site. This assumes 100% availability of
campus parking, although future analysis will
determine the number and location of parking
available for an event.
Northwest: 29%
North: 24%
Northeast: 21%
Southeast: 26%
Southwest: 0%
Understanding the number of patrons walking to a
game from parking is important for the following
reasons:
Determine pedestrian volumes to identify
appropriate traffic control devices to provide
a safe pedestrian environment during event
arrivals and departures.
Determine if roadway links should be closed
to vehicular traffic to establish pedestrian
corridors that support crowd surges.
Determine if there are any locations where
sidewalks should be widened or new
sidewalks should be constructed to support
event pedestrian volumes.
Coordinate with site planning to establish
appropriate locations for pedestrian plazas
on the stadium site.
Coordinate with site planning to provide
sufficient entry gates.
Determine locations for media, vendor, and
service vehicle access and parking to
minimize interaction with pedestrian flow
routes.
Site C Parking Distribution
7/25/12
T-4
August 9, 2012
31
Design and Best Practces
Visioning
An experience in which a personage, thing, or event appears vividly
or credibly to the mind, although not actually present, often under
the infuence of a divine or other agency.
VISIONING
August 9, 2012
32
Visioning
Hardworking
Welcoming
Inviting
Family Friendly
Faculty
Home
Alumni
Students
August 9, 2012
33
Visioning
Impressive
Landmark
Majestic
Beacon
Striking
Proud
Inspiring
August 9, 2012
34
Visioning
Tell the CSU story
World class university
Athletics
Academics
Passion
August 9, 2012
35
Visioning

Recognition
Stand up
Tell the CSU story
Global presence
Leadership
August 9, 2012
36
Visioning
Wilderness
Indoor/outdoor
Natural
Rocky Mountains
Embrace the surroundings
August 9, 2012
37
Visioning
THE
BRONZE
BOOT
TROPHY
Center of tradition
Winning traditions
Embrace special moments
Return to campus
Re-engage
August 9, 2012
38
Visioning
Experiential
Experimental
Showcase technologies
Interactive
August 9, 2012
39
Visioning
Connected
Balanced
Scaled
Views in/out
Gathering place
Bucolic
Fits in
August 9, 2012
40
Visioning
Great Green
Green University
August 9, 2012
41
Visioning

Premier research institution
Addressing world challenges
Social impact
August 9, 2012
42
Visioning
DESIGN
PROCESS

Stadium along the Front Range
The design for the new on-campus stadium
begins with a SITE
01
oriented between
Pitkin and Lake Street. This location offers
astounding views of the Rocky Mountain
Front Range while reinforcing the south end
of the Colorado State University Campus.
The design process begins much like a
sculptor starts with a block of clay. FORM
02

begins to take place with the seating bowl
being carved out of an extruded square
block. Next, the desire for CONNECTION
03

and integration into campus is achieved with
the break in the north endzone. This break
creates a spine along Meridian Avenue that
links the stadium back to the Great Green.
The architecture begins to take shape
with the UPLIFT
04
of masses and planes
similar to the way the Rocky Mountain
Front Range was generated by the collision
of tectonic plates.
FRACTURES
07
begin to generate
OPENINGS
05
in the facades and the seating
bowl. These voids help to further connect
the stadium to its natural surroundings and
offer spectacular views of Horsetooth and
Longs Peak.
FORCES
08
from the site begin to reinforce
the VERTICALITY
06
of our structure and
establsihes the new stadiums on-campus
presence as an iconic landmark that truly
embraces all that is Colorado.
August 9, 2012
43
Visioning
02
FORM
05
OPENINGS
08
FORCES
06
VERTICALITY
03
CONNECTION

01
SITE
04
UPLIFT
07
FRACTURES
August 9, 2012
44
Typology
System of groupings usually called types, the members of
which are identifed by postulating specifed attributes that
are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive-groupings
set up to aid demonstration or inquiry by establishing a
limited relationship among phenomena. A type may represent
one kind of attribute or several and need include only those
features that are signifcant for the problem at hand.
TYPOLOGY
August 9, 2012
45
Typology
HORIZONTALITY
B U I L D I N G
A
N AT U R E

HORIZONTAL EMPHASIS IN NATURE
the horizontal span
of the Rocky Mountain
front range
parallel in plane of
the horizon
HORIZONTAL EMPHASIS IN CSU
CAMPUS BUILDINGS
low building profle
horizontal, modular
building units - brick
& stone
glass facades emphasize
the horizontal joints over
the vertical mullions
facade compositions highlight
horizontal bands of material
DATUM...
A
August 9, 2012
46
Typology
VERTICALITY
B U I L D I N G N AT U R E
VERTICAL EMPHASIS IN NATURE
the vertical protrusion of
a Rocky Mountain peak
at a right angle to the horizon
VERTICAL EMPHASIS IN CSU
CAMPUS BUILDINGS
the intrusion of vertical plane
or mass within a building
emphasizing vertical structural
elements such as columns
emphasizing vertical
circulation such as stairs
facade compositions highlight
vertical shear walls
VERTICAL...
August 9, 2012
47
Typology
CANOPY &
OVERHANGS
B U I L D I N G

CANOPY &
OVERHANGS
N AT U R E

CANOPIES IN NATURE
coverings that provide shade
along a distinct path
tree lined streets and
walkways that provide a
sense of enclosure
CANOPIES & OVERHANGS IN CSU
CAMPUS BUILDINGS
protective coverings that
help defne a space
provide protection from
direct sunlight
identifable characteristic
to the building
ENCLOSURE...
August 9, 2012
48
Typology
OPENINGS
B U I L D I N G N AT U R E
OPENINGS ON CAMPUS
tunnels for pedestrians to
avoid railroad crossing
a passage to another point
on campus
OPENINGS IN CSU CAMPUS
BUILDINGS
open space serving as
a passage
a break or opening within the
building that allows students
to pass through
an identifable characteristic
to a building
punched windows in a
building facade reinforce
rhythm and repetition
RHYTHM &
REPETITION
August 9, 2012
49
Typology
FACADE
S T U DY
C D C
FACADE STUDIES
rhythm is carried in modular
building units
repetition is outlined in
repeating building elements
identifable characteristics
to the CSU campus
reinforces unity on campus
traditional CSU campus
architecture emphasizes
symmetry
modern CSU campus
architecture introduces
asymmetry to the campus
A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B
RHYTHM &
REPETITION
S T U DY

A
B B B B B
A A A A A A
B
August 9, 2012
50
Typology
ENTRY
B U I L D I N G

CSU CAMPUS FACADE STUDIES
traditional building entries
are outlined with ornate
architectural elements
traditional CSU campus
building entries are typically
found on the symmetrical
centerline of the building
modern CSU campus building
entries are typically enveloped
with glass and natural stone
ENTRY...
B U I L D I N G
August 9, 2012
51
Typology
SIGNAGE
B U I L D I N G

B U I L D I N G
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE
directs pedestrian, bike,
and vehicular traffc fows
informs the user
OVERSIZED SIGNAGE
engages the user
generator of interaction
defnes a place with an
identifable landmark
CAMPUS SIGNAGE
helps defne points of entry
contributes to wayfnding
promotes and embraces
the university
MOVEMENT...
August 9, 2012
52
Typology
MATERIALS
B U I L D I N G

N AT U R E
NATURAL MATERIALS
earth-tone color palette
identifable landforms
BUILDING MATERIALS
horizontal emphasis - stone
and brick
provides ambiguity between
interior and exterior
brings the outside in
PATHWAY MATERIALS
gives the campus texture
drives movement
distinguishes between zones
& places
TEXTURE...
August 9, 2012
53
Typology
LANDSCAPE
B U I L D I N G

N AT U R E
NATURAL LANDSCAPE
organic pathways marked with
natural stone
vernacular vegetation refect
the local traditions
earth-tone color palette
BUILDING LANDSCAPE
address the building facade
compliment the CSU campus
architecture
contributes to the intimacy of
the campus
GREAT GREEN
view corridor
recreational hub
multi-purpose
INTIMACY...
August 9, 2012
54
Typology
PLACE
C A MP U S

C O MMU N I T Y

COMMUNITY
defned by the people of
Fort Collins, the CSU faculty,
CSU staff, and CSU students
old town is a entertainment hub
CAMPUS
driven by academic excellence
passionate student, faculty,
and staff that are surrounded
by an intimate setting
embraced by the Rocky
Mountain front range
PLACE...
August 9, 2012
55
Typology
N AT U R E

SUSTAINABILITY
demonstrating sustainable
leadership
utilizing solar panels to
capture energy
the use of louvers to block
direct sunlight
utilizing natural ventilation
GREEN
preserving the green spaces
using plantlife to block
direct sunlight
GREEN...
ENERGY
B U I L D I N G

August 9, 2012
56
Uses
Architectural Program: Components/Characteristics of the Building/Project
(From March 31 SAC Meeting)
Should be Strongly Considered Maybe No______
1. Locker Rooms 12. Commercial Kitchen 1. Student Study Center 1. High-End Commercial
Restaurant
2. Alumni Welcome Center 13. Microbrewery Dispensary (not brewing) 2. Faculty Offices 2. Indoor Movie Theatre
proximate to stadium
3. Hotel annexed to the 14. Quality landscaping 3. Offices for Club Sports 3. Bowling Alley
Alumni Welcome Center
4. Large Meeting Rooms 15. Exterior Running Course 4. Private/Condo Residences 4. Indoor Golf Simulator
5. Large Reception Facilities 16. Training Table 5. Interior Running Course 5. Track Facility
6. Lecture Halls/Class Rooms 17. State-of-the-Art Press Box 6. Public Showers/Lockers for 6. Stadium Housing
Bicyclists, Others
7. Walk of the CSU Colleges 18. Video Production Capabilities 7. Art Gallery
8. Halls of Fame: Athletics 19. Soccer Field 8. Capabilities for Cold-Month
and University (in Alumni Center) Arts & Crafts Festivals
9. University Bookstore with 20. Lacrosse Field 9. Clock Tower
Logo Merchandise
10. Outdoor Plazas 21. Rugby Field 10. Rock Climbing Wall
11. Bicycle Parking 22. Retail
15
August 9, 2012
57
Detailed Program Matrix
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
New Football Stadium
Colorado State University
Page 1 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Units SF Total NSF Total GSF
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Spectator Seating Bleacher Seating 29,300 5.5 161,150
Priority Chairback Seating 8,000 6.5 52,000 Chairback seats for ~20% of spectator population
Band Seating 350 11.0 3,850 5' deep treads
SRO 0 0.0 0
Outdoor Club Seating 800 6.5 5,200 $1,700 ea
Sideline Field Club Seating (Lower Ram '50') Club 500 8.0 4,000 $1,100 ea Seats for this field level club are between the 40's
Loge Box Seating 160 18.0 2,880 $11,500 ea 40 loge boxes with 4 seats each (might be combination of 4, 6 or 8 seat loge
boxeswill use total patron count of 160).
FL-10
Founder's Suite Seating 96 10.0 960 6 founders suites share common lounge; 16 fixed seats per suite; recommended
to be less seats with more space per seat
"Long's Peak" Suite Seating 72 8.0 576 $40,000 ea 6 full size suites; 12 fixed seats per suite
Club Suite Seating 80 11.0 880 $22,500 ea 10 mini suites; seat 8 persons each, share common lounge, consider other seat
type than fixed seats
Ram's Horn Club 96 8.0 768 $1500 ea
President / Foundation Suite Seating 96 8.0 768
AD / Athletic Development Suite Seating 32 8.0 256
Head Coach's Family Suite Seating 16 8.0 128
Wheelchair and Companion Seating 378 22.0 8,316 Approximately 1/2% seating plus one companion for bleacher seating, band and
priority seating. All other seat types have wheelchair seating included. This
number is changed based on the overall capacity.
SUB-TOTAL - SPECTATOR CAPACITY 39,976 241,732 241,732
Founder Suites "Founder" Suites 6 300 1,800 High level custom finishes; provide flexible A/V for meetings and game day.
CCTV, game audio, post game interview feed
FL-03
Lobby 2 400 800 Service and Suite level FL-01
Common 'Founder Suites' Lounge 1 1,152 1,152 12 SF/person FL-01
Guest Services 1 75 75 Area within lounge for an attendant + closet FL-24
Pantry 1 400 400 Provide high level food service, possibly cooking in the suites FL-16
Men's Lounge Toilets 5 65 325 men 2 w.c. + 3 urinals + 2 lavs FL-02
Women's Lounge Toilets 4 65 260 women 4 w.c.+ 3 lavs FL-02
Janitor's Closet 2 25 50 FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - FOUNDER SUITES 4,862 6,078
Suites Private "Longs Peak" Suites 6 390 2,340 Assumes average suite of 12 fixed seats plus 4 bar stools; final configuration tbd. FL-04
Private Club Suites 10 160 1,600 assumes mini suites seat 8 persons each, share common lounge and amenities FL-05(A)
President / Foundation Suite 1 1,750 1,750 96 total seats @18 SF/person; adj to Athletic Development Suite; men 2 w.c. + 2
urinals + 2 lavs, women 3 w.c.+ 3 lavs
FL-03
Indoor Ram's Club 1 1,760 1,760 96 total seats @18 SF/person; men 2 w.c. + 2 urinals + 2 lavs, women 3 w.c.+ 3
lavs
FL-07
Space Type RoomDescription Recommended Program Finish Levels
CLASSIFICATION 1: SPECTATOR FACILITIES
August 9, 2012
58
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 2 of 11
A B C D E F G J K

(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Athletic Development Suite 1 640 640 24 fixed seats + 8 bar stools; adj to President Suite; 20 SF/person FL-04
Head Coach's Family Suite 1 320 320 12 fixed seats + 4 bar stools; views to field; 20 SF/person FL-04
Lobby 2 600 1,200 Service and Suite level FL-05(A)
Concierge 1 120 120 Area within lounge for an attendant + closet (Defib) FL-05(A)
Pantry 1 500 500 FL-16
Men's Toilets 4 55 220 w.c. ratio 1/90, urinal ratio 1/40, lav ratio 1/100 FL-06
Women's Toilets 4 55 220 w.c. ratio 1/25, lav ratio 1/100 FL-06
Family Toilet 2 65 130 FL-06
Storage 1 200 200 FL-21
Trash Storage 2 40 80 FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - SUITES 11,130 13,913
Club Suites Common Lounge Mini Suites Lounge Occupancy: 60 12 720 80 total patrons. Plan for 75% to occupy the lounge at the same time. FL-05(A)
Lobby 1 350 350 FL-05(A)
Pantry 1 350 350 FL-16
Men's Toilets 4 55 220 men 2 w.c. + 2 urinals + 2 lavs FL-06
Women's Toilets 4 55 220 women 4 w.c.+ 3 lavs FL-06
Coat Closet 1 50 50
SEE NOTE FL-05(A)
Club Storage 1 100 100
SEE NOTE FL-05(A)
SUB-TOTAL - CLUB SUITES LOUNGE 2,100 2,625
Sideline Field Club Sideline Field Club Seating (Lower Ram '50' Club)
Occupancy:
375 12 4,500 500 total patrons. Plan for 75% to occupy the lounge at the same time. FL-01
Lobby 1 350 350 FL-01
Pantry 1 350 350 FL-16
Women's Toilets 8 55 440 women 8w.c.+ 6 lavs FL-02
Coat Closet 1 100 100
SEE NOTE FL-01
SEE NOTE FL-01
SUB-TOTAL - SIDELINE FIELD CLUB LOUNGE 6,470 8,088
Stadium Club
(Outdoor Club Seats)
Club Lounge Occupancy: 600 12 7,200 Serves outdoor club seat patrons. FL-07
Club Lobby 2 500 1,000 Service and Club level FL-07
Club First Aid 1 120 120 Bed provided FL-20
Concession POS 8 100 800 1:100 for club only FL-16
Parents Lounge 1 275 275 Adjacent to the family toilet FL-05(B)
Conference Rooms 2 600 1,200 Executive level conference rooms/meeting rooms/rental use FL-05(A)
Men's Toilets 14 55 770 w.c. ratio 1/100, urinal ratio 1/50, lav ratio 1/100; 6 WC, 8 urinals FL-08
Women's Toilets 8 55 440 w.c. ratio 1/40, lav ratio 1/100; 8 WC FL-08
August 9, 2012
59
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 3 of 11
A B C D E F G J K

(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Coat Closet 1 400 400 Primary use for year round banquet / meeting / rental use.
SEE NOTE FL-07
SEE NOTE FL-07
SUB-TOTAL - STADIUM CLUB 12,770 15,963
Endzone Field Box
Club/MicroBrewery Bar
Tunnel Club Occupancy: 400 8 3,200 400 total patrons. Sell 400 memberships. There will be no field box loge seating
included.
FL-09
Lobby 1 250 250 FL-09
Pantry 1 250 250 FL-16
Coat Closet 1 50 50
SEE NOTE FL-09
SEE NOTE FL-09
SUB-TOTAL - ENDZONE FIELD CLUB 4,600 5,750
Loge Level Loge Lobby 1 350 350 FL-07
Loge Box Lounge 160 15 2,400 FL-07
Pantry 1 400 400 FL-16
SUB-TOTAL - LOGE LEVEL 3,680 4,600
Letterwinners (RAAC) Moved lounge area into endzone alumni center
Staff/Faculty Club Moved lounge area into endzone alumni center
Public Restrooms Public restroom facilities will be provided based on 42,000
(excludes club and suite seats) permanent seats and an
assumed ratio of 50:50 male-female attendance. Note: the
following ratios are based Populous recommendation for
men and 2009 IBC for women
FL-23
Men's Restrooms 276 50 13,800 w.c. ratio 1/300, urinal ratio 1/90, lav ratio 1/200 (64 wc, 212 urinals) FL-23
Women's Restrooms 330 55 18,150 w.c. ratio 1/40(first 1520)+1/60 remaining, lav ratio 1/150 (330 wc) FL-23
Family Toilets 6 65 390 FL-23
SUB-TOTAL - PUBLIC RESTROOMS 32,340 40,425
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Guest Services Main First Aid Room 1 750 750 Includes waiting/reception, triage, treatment, unisex restroom, lockable
cabinets, and janitor's closet; on service level adjacent to police area
FL-24
Guest Services 2 100 200 Adjacent to main concourse first aid - 1 @main, 1 @upcon FL-24
SUB-TOTAL - GUEST SERVICES 950 1,188
Hall of Fame Hall of Fame 1 4,500 4,500 FL-11
SUB-TOTAL - HALL OF FAME 4,500 5,625
325,134 345,985
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
CLASSIFICATION 2: FOOD SERVICE & RETAIL FACILITIES
Recommended Program Space Type RoomDescription
SUB-TOTAL (NET AREA)
Finish Levels
August 9, 2012
60
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 4 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Food Service Kitchen 1 4,000 4,000 FL-16
Main Commissary 1 3,000 3,000 FL-16
Offices 3 120 360 FL-19
Open Office for 3-5 Personnel 1 500 500 FL-19
Staff Restroom 1 65 65 FL-08
Money Counting Room 1 200 200 Includes vault FL-19
Food Service Custodial Support 1 250 250 FL-20
Food Service Personnel Locker Room 2 250 500 FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - FOOD SERVICE 8,875 11,094
Concession Stands Concession Stands will be distributed at regular intervals on
the Concourse(s). Five linear feet of counter space is
allowed per point-of-sale, with 20' depth to accommodate
storage in each stand.
FL-16
Concession Stands 152 100 15,200 POS ratio 1:250 spectators; Portable concessions will also be provided FL-16
Vendor Commissary 190 10 1,900 Ratio1:200 spectators-38,000 patrons @1:200=190 vendors@10sf = 1900sf FL-16
Concession Storage 2 500 1,000 FL-16
SUB-TOTAL - CONCESSION STANDS 18,100 22,625
Retail Sales Team Store 1 2,500 2,500 FL-25
Novelty Stands 1 300 300 Walk in merchandising in stadium FL-25
Merchandise Storage 1 400 400 For Team Store and Novelty FL-21
Micro Brewery Dispensary 1 2,500 Move to add alternate 1. either develop as future phase or build shell space.
depends on final location of this in the stadium design
FL-16
SUB-TOTAL - RETAIL SALES 3,200 4,000
SUB-TOTAL (NET AREA) 30,175 37,719
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Home Team Facility Entry 1 325 325 FL-12
Locker Room 120 45 5,400 FL-12
Showers / Drying / Toilets 1 1,600 1,600 FL-12
Coaches Meeting Rooms 0 200 0 FL-19
Coaches Locker Room / Showers 1 1,000 1,000 14 lockers FL-13
Head Coach Locker Room / Shower 1 250 250 1 locker FL-12
Head Coach Lounge/Recruiting Room 1 300 300 FL-05(B)
Head Coach Closing Room 1 400 400 Located in NW corner of suite or press level with views to Front Range, Playing
Field, Practice Fields and Campus
FL-05(B)
SUB-TOTAL - HOME TEAM FACILITY 9,275 11,594
Equipment Room Equipment 1 600 600 Trunk storage; roll-up issue window; access to loading dock with hydraulic dock
plate;
FL-21
Equipment Staff Locker Room 1 200 200 3 full size lockers; 16 half size lockers; include 1 unisex restroom FL-15
Small Laundry Room 1 250 250 One washer and one dryer Fl-21
SUB-TOTAL - EQUIPMENT 1,075 1,344
Athletic Training Training Room 1 1,000 1,000 5 Treatment tables, taping counter 20' long by 40" high x 34" deep, taping
counter 34" high x 33" deep x 3' long; storage in lockable millwork; crushed ice
machine near treatment tables
FL-17
Hydrotherapy 1 450 Cold and warm plunge (small size approximately 7' x 7'); provide 2' x 3' shower
area
FL-18
Exam Room 1 150 150 Provide wound care center with sink (upper and lower lockable cabinets) FL-17
X-Ray Room 1 150 150 Portable x-ray machine in stadium on game days. FL-17
CLASSIFICATION 3: TEAM FACILITIES
August 9, 2012
61
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 5 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Restroom 1 175 175 Restroom with shower FL-13
Meeting Room / Office 1 175 175 Seating for 4-5 persons FL-19
Supply Storage Room 1 80 80 Walk in storage off of training room FL-21
Field Drink Room 1 350 350 Locate adjacent to the field; ice freezer; 25 10 gal coolers; drink mix; 3
compartment sink; floor sink with hose bib
FL-21
Training Field Storage 1 100 100 Locate adjacent to the drink room and field; 2 bikes; 1 trunk FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - ATHLETIC TRAINING 2,180 2,725
Home Post Game Home Post Game Interview Room/Classroom 1 1,600 1,600 Assume 50 seated; 8-10 cameras on elevated platform; elevated platform at
front; direct wire to press box for sound and CCTV; provide ceiling grid system
for lighting; will be used as a classroom too.
FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - HOME POST GAME INTERVIEW 1,600 2,000
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Recruiting Room Recruiting Room 150 10 1,500 FL-05(B)
Recruiting Room Restrooms 2 200 400 FL-08
Recruiting Room Pantry 1 300 300 FL-16
SUB-TOTAL - RECRUITING ROOM 2,200 2,750
Support Field Toilets 2 65 130 Locate one at each field tunnel (visiting and home) FL-23
SUB-TOTAL - SUPPORT 130 163
Visiting Team Facility Visiting Entry 1 100 100 FL-13
Visiting Locker Room 80 30 2,400 2 separate locker rooms within facility, separated by OHD; equip. manager area
within the locker rm-no separate equip rm
FL-13
Visiting Showers / Toilets 2 700 1,400 FL-13
Visiting Training Room 1 400 400 2 taping; 2 treatment FL-17
Visiting Exam Room 1 120 120 FL-17
Visiting Media Interview Room 1 600 600 20-30 seats, plus 10-12 photographers, plus 3-4 cameras on platform FL-15
Visiting Coaches Locker Room 2 300 600 FL-13
SUB-TOTAL - VISITING TEAM FACILITY 5,620 7,025
Auxillary Locker Room Auxiliary Entry 2 100 200 FL-13
Auxiliary Locker Room 80 25 2,000 Width of locker will depend on final layout.2 separate locker rms within facility,
separated by OHD; Equip. mgr area within the locker rm-no separate equip rm
FL-13
Auxiliary Showers / Toilets 2 700 1,400 FL-13
Auxiliary Training Room 1 400 400 2 taping; 2 treatment FL-17
Auxiliary Exam Room 1 120 120 FL-17
Auxiliary Coaches Locker Room 2 300 600 FL-13
SUB-TOTAL - AUXILIARY LOCKER ROOM 4,720 5,900
Officials Chain Crew 1 300 300 6 lockers FL-20
Officials Lockers / Shower 2 300 600 6 lockers FL-13
Officials Meeting Room 1 175 175 Include official time clock in all rooms FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - OFFICIALS 1,075 1,344
Rec Sports Equipment Storage 1 400 Move to add alternate 1. Either develop as future phase or build shell space.
Depends on final location of this in the stadium design
FL-21
Coaches Work Room 1 300 Move to add alternate 1. Either develop as future phase or build shell space.
FL-20
Band Break Room/ Prep Room 1 1000 Move to add alternate 1. Either develop as future phase or build shell space.
Depends on final location of this in the stadium design; band, dance team,
cheerleaders use auxiliary locker rooms
FL-20
August 9, 2012
62
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 6 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Mascot / Handlers 1 250 Move to add alternate 1. Either develop as future phase or build shell space.
FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - 1,950 2,438
29,825 37,281
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Media and Press Box Lobby 2 300 600 1 @ground level; 1 @press level FL-14
Writing Press 80 22 1,760 Wire for 120 (24" o.c. for overflow) 30" o.c. for 130 FL-14
Home Radio 1 240 240 12 LF FL-14
Home 2 Radio 1 240 240 12 LF; Adjacent to the Home Radio booth FL-14
Visiting Radio 1 240 240 12 LF FL-14
Auxiliary Booths 3 240 720 12 LF each, 1 spanish radio, 1 westwood one FL-14
Network Television 1 400 400 20 LF FL-14
Officials 1 200 200 8 LF FL-14
Statisticians 1 300 300 12 total; 6 front; 15 LF; adjacent to PA Announcer FL-14
PA Announcer / Sound 1 300 300 4 front; 10 LF + sound equipment @back of room FL-14
Video / Scoreboard 1 300 300 4 front; 6 total; 10 LF FL-14
Home Coaches 1 300 300 15 LF; 4 front; 7 total FL-14
Visiting Coaches 1 300 300 15 LF FL-14
Instant Replay 1 200 200 4 across; 10 LF FL-14
Security Command Center/Game Management 1 300 300 20 LF, combined rooms, ICON: reduce size by 200 SF FL-14
Visiting Athletic Director 1 300 300 12 total; 6 front; 15 LF; adjacent to PA Announcer FL-14
Media Rights Provider 1 300 300 12 total; 6 front; 15 LF; adjacent to PA Announcer; Nelligan FL-20
Video Office / Storage Room 1 300 300 Coaches video office to capture video on XOS system; connect to training facility;
video equipment storage; remove control video cameras
FL-20
Covered Camera Deck 1 500 500 6-8 cameras, 5' o.c. per camera. 30-40LF; includes team video
SUB-TOTAL - PRESS BOX 7,800 9,750
Media / Press Support in the
Press Box
Food Service (Pantry/Serving Areas) 1 240 240 FL-16
Press Lounge/Dining 40 15 600 Seating for 40 FL-20
Media Work Room 1 350 350 Upper and lower lockable cabinets FL-20
Men's Toilet 1 300 300 FL-08
Women's Toilet 1 300 300 FL-08
Storage 2 40 80 FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - MEDIA SUPPORT (Press Box) 1,870 2,338
Media/Press Support in the
Stadium
Camera Locations 2 100 200 Other cameras are included in the seating bowl square footage
TV Crew Restroom 2 65 130 Locate near the TV truck parking or at media entrance FL-08
SUB-TOTAL - MEDIA / PRESS SUPPORT 330 413
10,000 12,500
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Ticketing Main Lobby 1 400 400 FL-19
Central Ticketing 16 50 800 FL-20
Work Area 1 200 200 6 workstations FL-20
Future Game Sales Windows 2 50 100 Internal windows to ticketed patrons FL-20
Guest Relations Conference Room 1 120 120 FL-19
Money Counting Room 1 120 120 FL-20
Break Room 1 120 120 FL-20
Restroom 1 65 65 FL-08
CLASSIFICATION 4: MEDIA FACILITIES
CLASSIFICATION 5: ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES
August 9, 2012
63
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 7 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Coat Closet 1 10 10 FL-20
Storage 1 65 65 Handheld ticket scanners FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - TICKET OFFICE 2,000 2,500
Guest Ticketing Home Team Guest Passes 1 150 150 Assumes 8' long counter, adjacent to visiting team guest passes FL-20
Visiting Team Guest Passes 1 150 150 Assumes 8' long counter, adjacent to home team guest passes FL-20
Non-Football Recruit Entry 1 150 150 Assumes 8' long counter, adjacent to h.s. coaches entry FL-20
High School Coaches Entry 1 150 150 Assumes 8' long counter, adjacent to recruit entry FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - GUEST TICKETING 600 750
2,600 3,250
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Offices / Operations Stadium Manager 1 150 150 FL-20
Receptionist / Lobby 1 200 200 FL-20
Assistant Manager / Ops Manager 1 120 120 FL-20
Event Manager 1 150 150 FL-20
Open Office Area 1 300 300 4 cubicles FL-20
Plan Room 1 120 120 FL-20
Conference Room 1 150 150 FL-20
Break Room / Copy 1 150 150 FL-21
Maintenance Showers 2 200 400 FL-08
University Event Management 1 1,000 1,000 Also stores rain gear, jackets and radios FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - OFFICES / OPERATIONS 2,805 3,506
Dock/Staging Cardboard Bailer and Recycling 1 1,000 1,000 FL-22
Trash Compactors 1 1,000 1,000 FL-22
Loading Dock Platform 1 1,000 1,000 FL-22
Truck Parking / Loading 0 4,000 0 Exterior to building, not built SF inside service level. 3 truck bays (visiting team
equip, home team equip, additional)
FL-22
SUB-TOTAL - DOCK/STAGING 3,000 3,750
Security Processing Center 1 200 200 FL-20
Security Command Center 1 200 200 Fire Command center is near or inside this space FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - SECURITY 465 581
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Storage Bulk Storage 1 4,000 4,000 FL-21
General Building Storage 1 4,000 4,000 FL-21
CAM's Truck / Trailer Storage 1 500 500 Covered & accessible storage for CAM's truck and trailer
Field Equipment 1 3,000 3,000 FL-21
Maintenance Shop 1 2,500 2,500 Includes 1 office plus open office area; break rm, emergency shower, trucks,
gators. Shops include: welding, carpentry, paint, electrical, etc with venting
FL-22
SUB-TOTAL - STORAGE 14,000 17,500
MEP AHU Rooms 4 1,500 6,000 Service level FL-22
Club / Suite / Press AHU 4 500 2,000 1 at club, 1 at suite, 2 at press FL-22
Main Electrical Room 2 1,500 3,000 One at 1,000 SF and one at 2,000 SF - Service level FL-22
Emergency Generator Room 0 800 0 Generator plus fuel tank - to be outside adjacent to chillers FL-22
Emergency Electrical 2 450 900 Locate adjacent to main electrical rooms FL-22
Space Type RoomDescription
Recommended Program Finish Levels
CLASSIFICATION 6: SERVICE & OPERATIONS FACILITIES
August 9, 2012
64
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 8 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Electrical Closets 12 200 2,400 3 at Serv (300sf), 5 each at main (200sf), 2 each at suite/press (200sf) FL-22
Main Tele/Data Room 1 1,000 1,000 FL-22
Tele/Data Closets 14 100 1,400 10'x10' preferred, 5 at Serv, 5 each at main, 2 each at suite/press FL-22
Fire Pump 1 700 700 On exterior wall adjacent to water pump rm FL-22
Water Pump 1 700 700 On exterior wall adjacent to fire pump rm FL-22
Chilled Water Pumping Room 1 1,200 1,200 Locate near the exterior location for the air cooled chillers FL-22
Domestic Water Heater / Booster Pump 1 800 800 Adjacent to water pump room - flues and intake to roof FL-22
Elevator Equipment Room(s) 8 150 1,200 FL-22
Sprinkler Valve Room 1 200 200 One room or several smaller rms scattered throughout FL-22
Fire Command Center 1 175 175 Located near or in Security Command Ctr FL-22
SUB-TOTAL - MEP 21,675 27,094
Janitorial Distributed Janitor Closets 6 25 150 6 @main FL-21
Central Custodial Storage 1 500 500 FL-21
Trash Collection/Recycling Room on Concourse 1 250 250 5' x 8' tilt bins (4); adjacent to trash chute FL-21
Trash Holding Room 2 120 240 1 @suite; 1 @club level FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - JANITORIAL 1,140 1,425 FL-21
43,085 53,856
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Concourse Concourse 38,000 3.0 114,000
SUB-TOTAL - CONCOURSE 114,000 114,000
Vertical Circulation North Grand Stairs 2 2,000 4,000
South Grand Stairs 2 1,500 3,000
East, West Exit Stairs 2 800 1,600
Stair Towers-West Side 4 800 3,200
Passenger Elevators 8 120 960
Freight Elevator 1 200 200
Service Elevators 1 200 200
Escalators 4 800
SUB-TOTAL - VERTICAL CIRCULATION 13,160 16,450
CLASSIFICATION 7: CIRCULATION
August 9, 2012
65
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 9 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Service Corridor Service Corridor 1 13,560 13,560
12' wide corridor; Service tunnel assumed to be 15' wide x 1130' long
Field Tunnel 2 1,000 2,000 Access to field
Restrooms 2 150 300 Place along the service corridor accessible by press and staff FL-23
SUB-TOTAL - SERVICE CORRIDOR 15,860 19,825
143,020 150,275
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Entry Lobby 1 1,000 1,000 Fl-11
Entertainment/Reception Room 1 2,000 2,000 Adjacent to lobby FL-05(B)
Model T Display Area 1 300 300 Adjacent to lobby; requries ability to drive in/out of the building
Reception Desk 1 80 80
SUB-TOTAL - ENTRY 3,380 4,225
Alumni Services Business Center 1 500 500 Area for 2 computers, copier, printer, service counter and work area behind FL-19
Director's Offices 7 180 1,260 FL-19
Offices 8 120 960 FL-19
Support Staff 6 100 600 FL-19
Staff Meeting Room 1 600 600 FL-19
Copy Room/Work Room 1 300 300 FL-20
Storage 2 200 400 FL-21
SUB-TOTAL - ALUMNI SERVICES 4,620 5,775
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
Meeting Rooms Meeting Rooms Size 1 1 480 480 20 person meeting rooms FL-19
Meeting Rooms Size 2 1 720 720 30 person meeting rooms FL-19
Large Auditorium 1 2,200 2,200 100 person meeting room; tiered seating with fixed tables and movable caster
chairs
FL-20
Executive Board Rooms 2 650 1,300 20-25 person meeting room with higher level of finishes. High end A/V and
sound for executive meetings
FL-20
SUB-TOTAL - MEETING ROOMS 4,700 5,875
Support Spaces Pantry 1 500 500 FL-16
Men's Restroom 8 50 400 FL-08
Women's Restroom 6 55 330 FL-08
CSU Library/Memorabilia Room 1 2,000 2,000 FL-20
Multi Purpose Space/Entertainment Room 1 3,000 3,000 FL-07
Retail Sales 1 500 500 FL-20
Exterior Balconies 0 0 0
Storage 2 120 240 FL-21
Security 1 150 150 FL-19
Trash / Recycling Holding 1 150 150 FL-22
A/V Office / Storage 1 150 150 FL-21
Air Handler 1 500 500 FL-22
Electrical Room 2 100 200 FL-22
Tele/Data Closets 2 100 200 FL-22
SUB-TOTAL - SUPPORT SPACES 8,320 10,400
CLASSIFICATION 8: CSU ALUMNI CENTER
August 9, 2012
66
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 10 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Letterwinner's Club (RAAC) Club Area Occupancy: 300 10 3,000 Includes buffet / food serving area; seats 160 banquet style seating at 18 sf/per
seat
FL-05(B)
Lobby 1 300 300 FL-05(B)
Pantry 1 450 450 FL-16
Coat Closet 1 100 100 SEE NOTE FL-
05(B)
Club Storage 1 200 200 SEE NOTE FL-
05(B)
SUB-TOTAL - LETTERWINNER'S CLUB 4,705 5,881
Staff / Faculty Club Club Area Occupancy: 150 10 1,500 Includes buffet / food serving area; 36 tables, seating 360 patrons. FL-05(B)
Lobby 1 300 300 FL-05(B)
Pantry 1 400 400 FL-16
Coat Closet 1 120 120 SEE NOTE FL-
05(B)
Club Storage 1 200 200 SEE NOTE FL-
05(B)
SUB-TOTAL - STAFF / FACULTY CLUB 3,010 3,763
28,735 35,919
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
TV Truck Parking TV Network Trucks 4 2,000 8,000 20' x 80' plus circulation
Satellite Trucks 8 275 2,200 6'-6" x 20' plus circulation
SUB-TOTAL - TV TRUCK PARKING 10,200 10,200
Special Parking 30' X 30' Parking Spots 0 900 0 Does not include circulation; provide power and cable
30' x 40' RV Parking Spots 0 1,200 0 Does not include circulation; provide power and cable
VIP Parking 0 180 0 Does not include circulation (400 SF / per with circulation); provide power and
cable
SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PARKING 0 0
CLASSIFICATION 9: SITE REQUIREMENTS
August 9, 2012
67
DRAFT PROGRAM
07.23.12
Page 11 of 11
A B C D E F G J K
Tailigate Pavilions Large 40' x 40' 0 1,600 0 Serves approximately 150 people; provide power and cable
Medium 20' x 40' 0 800 0 Serves approximately 80 people; provide power and cable
Small 20' x 20' 0 400 0 Serves approximately 40 people; provide power and cable
SUB-TOTAL - TAILGATE PAVILIONS 0 0
Chillers Air Cooled Chillers 2 1,000 2,000 Locate in close proximity to the stadium and the chilled water pump room 2-50'
x 10' chillers plus clearance
Transformers 4 150 600 2 - 8'x7' tranformers plus clearance
SUB-TOTAL - CHILLERS 2,600 2,600
Fan Services ESPN/Radio Show Production Pad 1 2,200 2,200 Provide 20' x 40' (800 SF) raised platform for radio show; provide guest area for
approximately 200 in front of platform (1,400 SF)
North Plaza SRO 4,300 6 25,800 provide standing room area for +/- 4000 patrons in north endzone plaza at grade
Ram Town 1 20,000 20,000 Provide power and cable
SUB-TOTAL - FAN SERVICES 48,000 48,000
60,800 60,800
(*1.25)
Base Bldg. Comments
325,134 345,985
30,175 37,719
29,825 37,281
10,000 12,500
2,600 3,250
43,085 53,856
143,020 150,275
583,839
57,027 Multiplier does not apply to seating, concourse or site square footage.
640,866 640,866 16.0 sf/seat
28,735 35,919
60,800 60,800
SUMMARY
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION: PARKING STRUCTURE
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 6: SERVICE & OPERATIONS FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 7: CIRCULATION
TOTAL NET SQUARE FOOTAGE (NSF)
+ NET-TO-GROSS MULTIPLIER (25%)
TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE (GSF)
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 1: SPECTATOR FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 2: FOOD SERVICE & RETAIL FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 3: TEAM FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 4: MEDIA FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 8: CSU ALUMNI CENTER
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION 9: SITE REQUIREMENTS
SUB-TOTAL CLASSIFICATION: GREEN HOUSES / PERC RESEARCH LAND RELOCATION
August 9, 2012
68
Concept Design - Floor Plans
10
20
30
4
0
5
0
10
20
30
4
0
10
20
30
4
0
5
0
4
0
30
20
1010
20
30
4
0
5
0
10
20
30
4
0
10
20
30
4
0
5
0
4
0
30
20
10
LOW BOWL
110,390 SF
UPPER BOWL
90,155 SF
ENTIRE BOWL
200,545 SF
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
Architecture, Engineering, Planning,
Interiors, Facility Programming
300 Wyandotte, Suite 200
Kansas City, Missouri 64105
816-221-1500
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
REVIEWED BY: DRAWN BY:
Copyright Populous Inc. 2012 C
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
AUDIO VISUAL/ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
FOOD SERVICE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
M/E/P/ FOODSERVICE ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
IRRIGATION CONSULTANT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A0-0
SEATING DIAGRAM
August 9, 2012
69
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
VISTING TEAM
LOCKER ROOM
8,550sf
HOME TEAM
LOCKER ROOM
16,560sf
FIELD SUITES
120sf (each)
SIDELINE
CLUB
6,970sf
GENERAL BUILDING
STORAGE
5,090sf
FOOD
SERVICE
12,000sf
TEAM
STORE
2,750sf
POST GAME
INTERVIEW
3,750sf
MEDIA CLUB
3,260sf
AUXILLARY
LOCKER ROOM
6,800sf
COACHES
LOCKER ROOM
1,700sf
CHEER/
MASCOT
AREA
BAND
AREA
MEDIA
SUPPORT
775sf
RECRUITING
ROOM
5,440sf
DOCK
13,220sf
TRAINING
&
EQUIPMENT
7,170sf
VENDOR
COMMISARY
2,800sf
FIELD
EQUIPMENT
STORAGE
3,390sf
GENERAL
BUILDING
STORAGE
5,300sf
MECHANICAL
2,200sf
STORAGE
4,600sf
RETAIL
STORE
3,660sf
TICKET
OFFICES
3,245sf
REC
SPORTS
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
3,840sf
SECURITY
& POLICE
SERVICES
HALL OF
FAME
8,500sf
GUEST
SERVICES
2,520sf
MAIN
JANITOR'S
CLOSET
1,700sf
OFFICES
CLUB
ESCALATORS
PLAZA
CONCESSION
STORAGE
1,025sf
24,660sf
ATTIC
STOCK
RETAIL
STORAGE
CHILLED
WATER PUMP
ROOM
AHU
MECHANICAL
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
MECH.
GUEST
TICKET
OFFICE
FUTURE
ALUMNI/VISITORS
CENTER
ESCALATORS
SHELL SPACE
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-1
SERVICE LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
231,580 SF
August 9, 2012
70
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
SIDELINE
CLUB
7,870sf
RAM SUITES
640sf (each)
RAM SEATS
1050sf
FUTURE
ALUMNI/VISITORS
CENTER
ESCALATORS
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-2
FIELD SUITE LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
12,760 SF
August 9, 2012
71
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
RESTROOM
3,140sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
CONCESSION
750sf
CONCESSION
1450sf
CONCESSION
750sf
CONCESSION
870sf
CONCESSION
870sf
RESTROOM
870sf
RESTROOM
870sf
MECHANICAL
PLAZA
MICRO BREW
BEER GARDEN
3,040sf
RESTROOM
3,140sf
RESTROOM
3,140sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
CONCESSION
1450sf
CONCESSION
750sf
CONCESSION
1450sf
CONCESSION
750sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
CONCESSION
750sf
RAM TERRACE
CONCESSION
2,450sf
RESTROOM
3,140sf
CONCESSION
1450sf
CONCESSION
2,450sf
RESTROOM
4,300sf
RESTROOM
4,300sf
RESTROOM
2,250sf
CONCESSION
750sf
RETAIL
3,040sf
RESTROOM
1,145sf
CONCESSION
750sf
FUTURE
ALUMNI/VISITORS
CENTER
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-3
MAIN LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
233,240 SF
August 9, 2012
72
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
STADIUM
CLUB
24,000sf
LETTER WINNER'S
CLUB
11,500sf
ALUMNI
TERRACE
FUTURE
ALUMNI/VISITORS
CENTER
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-4
CLUB LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
24,000 SF
August 9, 2012
73
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
INDOOR RAM'S SEATING - 960sf
LOGE BOXES - 20sf (each)
HEAD COACHES FAMILY SUITE - 440sf
AD SUITE - 780sf
PRESIDENT/FOUNDATION SUITE - 1,670sf
RECRUIT CLOSING ROOM - 890sf
GOLD SUITES - 160sf (each)
GOLD SUITE
LOUNGE
3,240sf
LOGE AREA
5,450sf
INDOOR RAM'S
CLUB
2,085sf
STAFF FACULTY CLUB
5,400sf
FUTURE
ALUMNI/VISITORS
CENTER
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-5
LOGE LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
38,000 SF
August 9, 2012
74
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
HOME RADIO 1 - 240sf
NETWORK TV - 400sf
OFFICIALS - 240sf
HOME RADIO 2 - 240sf
MEDIA RIGHTS PROVIDER - 300sf
VISITING RADIO 2 - 240sf
VISITING COACHES - 300sf
VISITING AD - 300sf
STAT - 300sf
PA - 300sf
HOME COACHES - 300sf
REPLAY - 240sf
SCOREBOARD - 330sf
SECURITY COMMAND
& GAME MANAGEMENT - 540sf
AUXILIARY RADIO 1 - 240sf
WRITING PRESS - 1,700sf
GREEN SUITES - 390sf (each)
LONGS PEAK
TERRACE
PRESS SUPPORT
2,145sf
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
16 8 0 32 64
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
A1-6
PRESS LEVEL
REFERENCE PLAN
38,000 SF
August 9, 2012
75
Concept Design - Elevatons
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
ELEVATIONS
A5-1
NORTH ELEVATION - 1/32 =1-0
CURTAIN WALL
WOOD LOUVER SYSTEM
STONE MASONRY
EAST ELEVATION - 1/32 =1-0
BRICK MASONRY
METAL TRUSS LIGHT STANDARDS
METAL PANEL CLOSURE
CONCRETE TREADS AND RISERS
BRICK MASONRY
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
METAL ROOF
CURTAIN WALL
BRICK MASONRY
STONE MASONRY
August 9, 2012
76
Concept Design - Elevatons
PROJECT NORTH
U
n
iv
e
r
s
ity
POPULOUS, INC
816-221-1500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
PACKAGE
PROJECT NO.:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
CODE CONSULTANTS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
F
O
R
T
C
O
L
L
IN
S
, C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
ISSUE DATE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
WAYFINDING/SIGNAGE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX-XXX-XXXX
D
B
C
A
ELEVATIONS
A5-2
SOUTH ELEVATION - 1/32 =1-0
METAL ROOF
CURTAIN WALL
METAL PANEL SYTEM
STONE MASONRY
WEST ELEVATION - 1/32 =1-0
METAL PANEL SYSTEM
BRICK MASONRY
CURTAIN WALL
METAL PANEL SYSTEM
BRICK MASONRY
STONE MASONRY
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
STONE MASONRY
METAL TRUSS LIGHT STANDARDS
August 9, 2012
77
Concept Design - Sectons
August 9, 2012
78
Concept Design - Rendering
August 9, 2012
79
August 9, 2012
80
August 9, 2012
81
LEED Score Sheet
LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Colorado State University Football Stadium
Project Checklist May 23, 2012
18 6 2 Possible Points: 26
Y ? N d/C Notes:
Y C Prereq 1
1 d Credit 1 1
5 d Credit 2 5 Assumed yes due to campus location. Verify.
1 d Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 Has an environmental assessment been performed?
6 d Credit 4.1 6 Assumed yes due to campus location. Verify.
1 d Credit 4.2 1 Refer to TCF Bank for strategy.
3 d Credit 4.3 Alternative TransportationLow-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 3 Owner option.
2 d Credit 4.4 2 No new parking.
1 C Credit 5.1 Site DevelopmentProtect or Restore Habitat 1
1 d Credit 5.2 Site DevelopmentMaximize Open Space 1
1 d Credit 6.1 Stormwater DesignQuantity Control 1 Usually requires too much land area. Epic system?
1 d Credit 6.2 Stormwater DesignQuality Control 1
Landscape filtration and/or mechanical filtration system
1 C Credit 7.1 Heat Island EffectNon-roof 1 Natural vegetation and light color pavement.
1 d Credit 7.2 1 Meet minimum SRI requirements.
1 d Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
Sport lighting can be exempted, but campus saftey standards
often excede requirements.
Y ? N Notes:
Y d Prereq 1
4 d Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping 2 to 4
Colorado is water conscious and native vegetation provides a
great opportunity.
Reduce by 50% 2
4 No Potable Water Use or Irrigation 4
2 d Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 2
3 1 d Credit 3 2 to 4
Use ultra-low flow fixtures. ME confirming client does not
want waterless urinals.
Reduce by 30% 2
0 3 Reduce by 35% 3
1 Reduce by 40% 4
Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
Site Selection
Development Density and Community Connectivity
Alternative TransportationPublic Transportation Access
Alternative TransportationBicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
Sustainable Sites
Water Efficiency
Alternative TransportationParking Capacity
Heat Island EffectRoof
Water Use Reduction20% Reduction
Water Use Reduction
LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Project Checklist 1 of 4
Y ? N Notes:
Y C Prereq 1
Y d Prereq 2
Y d Prereq 3
7 6 6 d Credit 1 1 to 19
Improve by 12% for New Buildings or 8% for Existing Building Renovations 1
7 Improve by 24% for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Building Renovations 7
Need to define comfort level expectations. Use evaporative
cooling. Confirm USGBC ruling on modeling of central plant
and its actual efficiency.
Improve by 48%+ for New Buildings or 44%+ for Existing Building Renovations 19
1 6 d Credit 2 1 to 7
Use third party provider for PPA agreement. Roof mounted PV
system. Portions could be distributed on campus but may not
count towards project certification.
1 1% Renewable Energy 1
3% Renewable Energy 2
2 C Credit 3 2
2 d Credit 4 2
3 C Credit 5 3
2 C Credit 6 2 Need estimate of cost. $30,000?
Energy and Atmosphere
Enhanced Commissioning
Enhanced Refrigerant Management
Measurement and Verification
Green Power
Minimum Energy Performance
Optimize Energy Performance
On-Site Renewable Energy
Fundamental Refrigerant Management
Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems
August 9, 2012
82
LEED Score Sheet
Y ? N Notes:
Y d Prereq 1
3 C Credit 1.1 1 to 3
Reuse 55% 1
Reuse 75% 2
Reuse 95% 3
1 C Credit 1.2 Building ReuseMaintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1
2 C Credit 2 1 to 2
This credit usually will receive an additional innovation point.
50% Recycled or Salvaged 1
2 75% Recycled or Salvaged 2
2 C Credit 3 1 to 2
Reuse 5% 1
Reuse 10% 2
2 C Credit 4 1 to 2
10% of Content 1
2 20% of Content 2
2 C Credit 5 1 to 2
10% of Materials 1
2 20% of Materials 2
1 C Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1
1 C Credit 7 1
Not worth the added cost and paperwork for one point.
Y ? N Notes:
Y d Prereq 1
Y d Prereq 2
1 d Credit 1 1
1 d Credit 2 1
1 C Credit 3.1 1
1 C Credit 3.2 1
1 C Credit 4.1 1
1 C Credit 4.2 1
1 C Credit 4.3 1
1 C Credit 4.4 1
1 d Credit 5 1
Required MERV 13 HVAC filters, exhaust systems, cleaning
agreement
1 d Credit 6.1 Controllability of SystemsLighting 1
Would require occupant controls in individual and multi-
occupant spaces. Achieved on Miami and pursuing on San Jose
CC.
1 d Credit 6.2 1
1 d Credit 7.1 1
1 d Credit 7.2 Thermal ComfortVerification 1
1 d Credit 8.1 1
1 d Credit 8.2 1 Daylight and ViewsViews
Low-Emitting MaterialsAdhesives and Sealants
Low-Emitting MaterialsPaints and Coatings
Low-Emitting MaterialsFlooring Systems
Low-Emitting MaterialsComposite Wood and Agrifiber Products
Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
Controllability of SystemsThermal Comfort
Thermal ComfortDesign
Daylight and ViewsDaylight
Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring
Increased Ventilation
Construction IAQ Management PlanDuring Construction
Construction IAQ Management PlanBefore Occupancy
Storage and Collection of Recyclables
Building ReuseMaintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof
Construction Waste Management
Materials Reuse
Recycled Content
Regional Materials
Certified Wood
Materials and Resources
Indoor Environmental Quality
Y ? N Notes:
1 d/C Credit 1.1 1 Achieved on TCF Bank Stadium.
1 d/C Credit 1.2 1
Can typically be provided by contract cleaner. Self performed
at TCF Bank Stadium.
1 d/C Credit 1.3 1 Signage and tours
1 d/C Credit 1.4 1
1 d/C Credit 1.5 1
1 d/C Credit 2 1
Y ? N Notes:
1 d/C Credit 1.1 1
1 d/C Credit 1.2 1
1 d/C Credit 1.3 1
1 d/C Credit 1.4 1
1 d/C Credit 1.5 1
1 d/C Credit 1.6 1
Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110
Regional Priority Credits
Innovation in Design: Education
Innovation in Design: Double Green Power
Regional Priority: EAc1 Optimize Energy Performance 48% Reduction
Regional Priority: EAc2 Renewable Energy 13%
Innovation and Design Process
Total
LEED Accredited Professional
Regional Priority: SSc2 Development Density and Connectivity
Regional Priority: SSc6.1 Stormwater Quantity Control
Regional Priority: WEc1 No Potable Water/Irrigation
Regional Priority: WEc3 40% Water Use Reduction
Innovation in Design: MRc2 Waste Management 95% Diversion
Innovation in Design: Green Cleaning
Innovation in Design: TBD
August 9, 2012
83
MARKET STUDY REPORT
August 9, 2012
84
CSLPremiumSeatingRecommendations
Year Opened 2009
TCFBANKSTADIUM
UniversityofMinnesota
YearOpened
Capacity
ProjectCost
2009
50,805
$303M
CSLRecommendationsvs.ActualBuildingProgram
Inventory AverageAnnualPrice
CSLRecommendations
Current Average
% Annual
TCFBankStadiumPremiumSeating
SeatingArea Low High Low High
ClubSeats:
Indoor 250 300 $2,800 $3,000
Outdoor 1,000 1,200 $1,850 $2,000
SeatingArea Inventory Sold Price
ClubSeats:
Indoor 250 60% $2,400
Outdoor 1,200 100% $1,800
3
LogeBoxes 45 60 $13,500 $15,000
LuxurySuites 35 40 $40,000 $42,500
LogeBoxes 54 100% $11,300
LuxurySuites 37 84% $43,000
CSL has conducted feasibility and related analyses for over 60 Division I collegiate
athletc clients. The data below illustrates the extent and accuracy achieved by
CSL for the new stadium at the University of Minnesota.
August 9, 2012
85
CSLPremiumSeatingRecommendations
University ofOregon
Average Current Average
Annual % Annual
Seating Area Inventory Price Seating Area Inventory Sold Price
Club Seats: Club Seats:
y g
ActualBuilding Program CSL Recommendations
Outdoor 3,000 $1,000 Outdoor 3,000 100% $750
Outdoor 350 $600 Outdoor 381 100% $1,250
Luxury Suites 32 $40,000 Luxury Suites 31 100% $42,500
CSL Recommendations Actual Building Program
University ofIowa
SeveralrecentCSL
collegiatefootball
stadiumrenovation
j t
Annual % Annual
Outdoor 1,150 $2,300 Outdoor 1,150 98% $2,200
Indoor 310 $5 000 Indoor 130 100% $5 000
CSL Recommendations ActualBuilding Program
projects
Ingeneral,schools
followedCSLbuilding
Indoor 310 $5,000 Indoor 130 100% $5,000
Oregon StateUniversity
CSL Recommendations ActualBuilding Program
g
recommendations.
Premiumseating
inventories between
Annual % Annual
Scenario#1
(1)
2,040 $1,700 Outdoor 3,100 80% $1,325
Scenario#2
(2)
1,890 $1,700 Indoor 200 100% $3,750
Lo e Bo es 52 $10 700 Lo e Bo es 52 100% $12 000
inventoriesbetween
80%and100%sold
4
LogeBoxes 52 $10,700 LogeBoxes 52 100% $12,000
(1) Assumednologeboxesorindoorclubseatsbuilt.
(2) Assumedlogeboxeswerebuiltbutindoorclubseatswerenotbuilt.
August 9, 2012
86
StudyComponents
Comparable
Competitive
p
Facilities
Facilities
MarketDemand
&
Building
Historical
Analysis
Market
Surveys
Building
Program
Financial
Projections
&
Funding
Potential
5
August 9, 2012
87
MountainWestConferencePremiumSeating
Total Total
Total Average Average Average Actual Potential
Luxury Suites LogeBoxes ClubSeats
Total Average Average Average Actual Potential
Seating # % Annual # % Annual # % Annual Annual Annual
School Stadium Capacity Suites Sold Cost Boxes Sold Cost Seats Sold Cost Revenue Revenue
Boi se State BroncoStadi um 37,000 38 100% $45,000 43 100% $12,000 787 100% $2,200 $3,957,000 $3,957,000
UNLV SamBoydStadi um 36,800 16 100% $50,000 0 n/a n/a 488 100% $1,500 $1,532,000 $1,532,000
NewMexi co Uni versi tyStadi um 39,224 9 100% $21,000 0 n/a n/a 1,597 100% $839 $1,529,000 $1,529,000
Ai r Force Fal con Stadi um 52 480 9 100% $20 000 0 n/a n/a 825 100% $1 072 $1 064 000 $1 064 000 Ai rForce Fal conStadi um 52,480 9 100% $20,000 0 n/a n/a 825 100% $1,072 $1,064,000 $1,064,000
Wyomi ng WarMemori al Stadi um 29,181 10 100% $40,000 0 n/a n/a 256 100% $2,500 $1,040,000 $1,040,000
Nevada MackayStadi um 29,993 58 100% $16,500 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a $957,000 $957,000
Colorado State Hughes Stadium 32,500 12 92% $28,000 0 n/a n/a 427 87% $1,500 $868,000 $977,000
FresnoState Bul l dog Stadi um 41,031 22 100% $35,000 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a $770,000 $770,000
SanJose State
(1)
SpartanStadi um 30,456 12 100% $12,000 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a $144,000 $144,000
SanDi egoState
(2)
Qual commStadi um 70,561 8 100% $8,400 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a $67,000 $67,000
Hawai i Al ohaStadi um 50,000 0
(3)
n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
UtahState RomneyStadi um 25,413 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Average(excluding CSU) 41,673 20 100% $28,000 43 100% $12,000 791 100% $1,622 $1,229,000 $1,229,000
(1) SanJoseStateiscurrently adding six24seatsuitestotheNorthendzoneof SpartanStadium.
(2) San Diego State receives eight suites per year in Qualcomm Stadium which cost $1 200 per game The City also allocates club seats for use by the University but information was not available
*Utah State and San Jose State will become members of the Mountain West Conference in 2013 following the
(2) SanDiegoStatereceiveseightsuitesperyearinQualcommStadium,whichcost$1,200pergame.TheCityalsoallocatesclubseatsforusebytheUniversity,butinformationwasnotavailable.
(3) Hawaiioffersfieldlevelsuitesfor$3,500pergame,whichincludes24ticketsandcatering.Inventoryunavailableatthetimeof thisreport.
Note:Averageinventory andpricing reflectsonlythoseschoolsthatoffereachconcept.
Source:Interviewswithathleticdepartmentofficials,RevenuesfromSportsVenuesCollegeEdition
6
UtahStateandSanJoseStatewillbecomemembersoftheMountainWestConferencein2013,followingthe
departureofBoiseStateandSanDiegoState.
August 9, 2012
88
SurveyCompletionStatistics
Numberof Percentageof g
Estimated Survey Percentageof Survey Marginof
Population Responses Population Responses Error
(1)
RamClubDonors
(2)
6,765 822 12% 13% 3.2%
NonRamClubAthleticsDonors 6,674 224 3% 3% 6.4% ,
NonRamClubFootballSeasonTicketHolders 2,263 178 8% 3% 7.1%
NonRamClubOccasionalTicketBuyers 9,879 1,435 15% 22% 2.4%
Other
(3)
114,509 3,840 3% 59% 1.6%
Total 140,090 6,499 5% 100% 1.2%
(1) Basedona95%confidenceinterval,indicating thatwewouldexpecttogeneratesamesurveyresults95timesoutof 100,plusorminus1.2percent.
(2) IncludesRamClubdonorssince2000.
(3) Includes CSUfaculty and staff CSUalumni living within a 100 mile radius University donors living within 100 mile radius former student athletes (3) IncludesCSUfacultyandstaff,CSUalumnilivingwithina100mileradius,Universitydonorsliving within100mileradius,formerstudentathletes,
andalumniassociationboardmembers.
Note:Responses basedonatotalof 69,390surveys sentout.Totalresponserateof approximately 9.4percent.
7
August 9, 2012
89
SurveyRespondentStatus
Ram NonRamClub NonDonor NonDonor
Club Athletics SeasonTicket Occasional All
Status Donors Donors Holders TicketBuyers Other Respondents
R Cl b D 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13%
IncidenceRate
RamClubDonor 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13%
AthleticsDonor(nonRamClub) 11% 100% 0% 0% 0% 5%
FootballSeasonTicketHolder 60% 15% 100% 0% 0% 11%
OccasionalFootballTicketBuyer 24% 53% 6% 100% 0% 27%
Alumni 76% 80% 70% 75% 69% 72%
( hl ) UniversityDonor(nonathletic) 37% 44% 20% 24% 12% 19%
CorporateSponsor 3% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1%
Faculty/Staff 10% 11% 17% 21% 33% 26%
Student(currentonly) 1% 2% 2% 3% 7% 5%
NoneoftheAbove 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1%
MostCommonSelectionsperSurveyGroup
*Mul ti pl e responseswere accepted.
RamClubDonors
Alumni 76%
FBseasonticketholder 60%
Universitydonor 37%
NonRamClubAthleticDonors
Alumni 80%
OccasionalFBticketbuyer 53%
Universitydonor 44%
SeasonTicketHolders
Alumni 70%
Universitydonor 20%
Faculty/Staff 17%
8
OccasionalTicketBuyers
Alumni 75%
Universitydonor 24%
Faculty/Staff 21%
Other
Alumni 69%
Faculty/Staff 33%
Universitydonor 12%
August 9, 2012
90
AttendanceImpactofNewStadium
Historical Anticipated NewStadium Percentage
Attendance Attendance Increase Increase
AverageGamesperSeason
atHughes atNew (Decrease) (Decrease)
Stadium Stadium Attendance Attendance
RamClub 4.1 4.7 0.6 14%
AthleticsDonor(nonRamClub) 2.4 3.0 0.6 24%
NonDonorFootballSeasonTicketBuyer 5.2 4.6 0.6 11%
NonDonorOccassionalFootballTicketBuyer 1.8 2.3 0.6 32%
Other 0.8 1.1 0.3 33%
OVERALL 1.6 2.0 0.4 22%
9
August 9, 2012
91
EstimatedCSUNewStadiumAttendance
10YearCSUAverageAttendance
EstimatedAverageAttendance
BasedonHistoricalAttendance
EstimatedAverageTicketsOut LOW
Total Attendance
Seating Average as%
Year Capacity Attendance
(1)
ofCapacity
2011 32 500 21 867 67 3%
22,637 (200911Average Ti cketsOut)
x1.22(new stadi umfactorfromsurvey)
27,617 (attendance i nnew stadi um)
2011 32,500 21,867 67.3%
2010 32,500 22,400 68.9%
2009 32,500 23,643 72.7%
2008 32,500 21,008 64.6%
2007 32,500 21,794 67.1% EstimatedAverageTicketsOut BASE
2006 32,500 24,183 74.4%
2005 32,500 29,347 90.3%
2004 30,000 27,296 91.0%
2003 30,000 30,631 102.1%
2002 30 000 30 461 101 5%
25,263 (10YearAverage Ti cketsOut)
2002 30,000 30,461 101.5%
10YearAverage 25,263 80.0%
(1) Averageattendancereflects"TotalTicketsOut".
EstimatedAverageTicketsOut HIGH
10
30,631 (10YearHi ghAverage Ti cketsOut)
August 9, 2012
92
PremiumSeatingConceptsTested
PrioritySeats FieldLevelClubMemberships ClubSeats
LogeBoxes LuxurySuites ClubSuites
11
August 9, 2012
93
SummaryofPremiumSeatingInterest
Premium
Seating
AllSurvey Groups
Seating
Concept Definitely Likely Possibly Total
Field LevelClub Memberships:
Initial Interest Before Pricing 28% 22% 29% 79%
Interest at VariousPricingLevels
$500 30% 34% 34% 97%
$450 32% 34% 31% 97% $450 32% 34% 31% 97%
$400 37% 31% 28% 97%
Club Seats:
$2,000 2% 5% 31% 38%
$1,500 3% 6% 30% 38%
$1,000 5% 9% 33% 47%
LogeBoxes:
$15,000 1% 2% 16% 19%
$12,000 2% 1% 14% 16%
$9,000 2% 3% 18% 23%
Luxury Suites:
$50,000 3% 4% 17% 23%
$40,000 3% 2% 17% 23%
$30,000 3% 3% 21% 27%
Club Suites:
$27,500 3% 4% 22% 28%
12
,
$22,500 3% 4% 21% 29%
$17,500 4% 5% 31% 39%
Note:Initialinterestquestionsaskedonlyof thoserespondentsindicating aninterestinattending gamesinanewstadium.
Note:Onlythoserespondentsindicating aninitialinterestineachseating conceptwereaskedtheirinterestateachpricepoint.
August 9, 2012
94
RecentCollegiateNamingRightsValues
Naming Average
Rights Annual
Stadium School Value Duration Revenue
BoonePickensStadium OklahomaState $165,000,000 30
*
$5,500,000
AutzenStadium Oregon $45,000,000 30
*
$1,500,000
TCFBankStadium Minnesota $35,000,000 25 $1,400,000
ApogeeStadium NorthTexas $20,000,000 20 $1,000,000
BrightHouseNetworksStadium CentralFlorida $15,000,000 15 $1,000,000
CapitalOneFieldatByrdStadium Maryland $20,000,000 25 $800,000
JonesAT&TStadium TexasTech $20,000,000 25 $800,000
HighPointSolutionsStadium Rutgers $6,500,000 10 $650,000
InfoCisionStadium Akron $10,000,000 20 $500,000
PapaJohn'sCardinalStadium Louisville $15,000,000 44 $341,000
HouchensIndustriesL.T.SmithStadium WesternKentucky $5,000,000 30
*
$167,000
Average $32 000 000 25 $1 242 000 Average $32,000,000 25 $1,242,000
Median $20,000,000 25 $800,000
*Note:BoonePickensStadium,AutzenStadium,andHouchensIndustriesL.T.SmithStadiumhavelifetimenamingrightsagreements.
For purposes of a comparative analysis the termhas been assumed to be 30 years which is generally the useful life of a sports venue
14
Forpurposesof acomparativeanalysis,thetermhasbeenassumedtobe30years,whichisgenerallytheusefullifeof asportsvenue.
August 9, 2012
95
RecommendedBuildingProgram
InterimDraft
SubjecttoChange
Actual Potential
Annual % Annual Annual
Inventory Donation sold Revenue Revenue
Priority Seats:
Goal l i ne to20's 3,000 $200 85% $510,000 $600,000

Between20'sand40's 3,000 $400 85% $1,020,000 $1,200,000
Between40's 2,000 $600 85% $1,020,000 $1,200,000
Total $2,550,000 $3,000,000
PremiumSeats:
Fi el dLevel Cl ubMembershi ps 500 $500 85% $213,000 $250,000
EndZone Cl ubMembershi ps 400 $300 85% $102,000 $120,000
OutdoorCl ubSeats 800 $1,700 85% $1,156,000 $1,360,000
IndoorCl ubSeats 96 $2,000 85% $163,000 $192,000
Loge Boxes 40 $11,500 85% $391,000 $460,000
Cl ubSui tes 10 $22,500 85% $191,000 $225,000
Long'sPeakSui tes 6 $40,000 85% $204,000 $240,000
Total $2,420,000 $2,847,000
TOTALREVENUE $4,970,000 $5,847,000
Priority /PremiumSeating Matrix BaseScenario
TotalCapacity: Approx.35,000to43,000seats
PremiumSeatingProgram: 6FoundersSuites
6Long'sPeakSuites (1)
10ClubSuites (2)
40LogeBoxes (3)
800OutdoorClubSeats
96IndoorClubSeats
500FieldLevelClubMemberships
400EndZoneClubMemberships
PrioritySeatingProgram: 8,000seats
(1)16seat l uxury sui tes.
(2)8seat cl ubsui tes.
(3)4seat l ogeboxes.
RecommendedBuildingProgram
August 9, 2012
96
AssumptionsUsedinFinancialProjections
CSLhasdeveloped3
potentialoperating
scenarios.
Attendancehasbeen
inflatedby4percent
peryearfromYear1
toYear5.
Attendanceremains
constantafterYear5.
Low Base High
Scenario Scenario Scenario
AverageTickets Distributed(Includes paid,comp,andstudents) Year1 29,000 35,000 42,800
AveragePaidAttendance Year1 19,000 25,000 32,800
AverageStanding RoomOnly TicketPrice $10.00 $12.50 $15.00
AverageIndividual TicketPrice(Basedon2012pricing) $40.00 $48.00 $55.00
AverageSeason TicketPrice(Basedon2012pricing) $225 $250 $300
Priority SeatDonations:
Goal l i ne to20's 3,000seats $150 $200 $300
20'sto40's 3,000seats $300 $400 $500
Betweenthe 40's 2,000seats $500 $600 $700
Total 8,000seats
PremiumSeatDonations:
Fi el dLevel Cl ubMembershi ps(Betweenthe 40's)500membershi ps $400 $500 $600
SouthEndZone Cl ubMembershi ps 400membershi ps $200 $300 $400
OutdoorCl ubSeats 800seats $1,500 $1,700 $1,900
IndoorCl ubSeats 96seats $1,750 $2,000 $2,250
Loge Boxes(4seats) 40l oge boxes $10,000 $11,500 $13,000
Cl ubSui tes(8seats)10cl ubsui tes $20,000 $22,500 $25,000
Long'sPeakSui tes(16seats) 6sui tes $35,000 $40,000 $45,000
%Priority /PremiumInventory Sold:
%sol d 75% 85% 95%
Concession PerCap:
NonPremi umSeati ng Patrons $6.50 $8.50 $10.50
Premi umSeati ng Patrons $20.00 $25.00 $30.00
MerchandisePerCap:
Al l Patrons $1.00 $2.00 $3.00
Parking:
90%capturedbyUni versi typarki ng $10.00 $20.00 $30.00
Tailgating:
Desi gnatedTai l gati ng Areas $75,000 $100,000 $150,000
Facility Fee:
Si ngl eGame Footbal l Ti ckets $2.00 $3.50 $5.00
Si ngl eGame Men's&Women'sBasketbal l / Vol l eybal l Ti ckets $1.00 $2.00 $3.00
StadiumNaming Rights (Cashonly) $400,000 $500,000 $750,000
Advertising /Sponsorship(Infacility signage,ingamepromotions,othersponsorshipagreements) $3,050,000 $3,550,000 $4,050,000
OtherEventRevenue $100,000 $150,000 $200,000
NonGameDay Club Rental Revenue $150,000 $250,000 $350,000
GameDay Expenses (Ushers,tickettakers,security,trafficcontrol,medicalstaff,etc.) $480,000 $600,000 $900,000
OtherOperating Expenses (salaries &benefits,supplies,utilities,repairs &maintenance,etc.) $925,000 $1,140,000 $1,555,000
NSMShareof Existing SponsorshipRevenue (Basedon2011revenue) $1,359,000 $1,359,000 $1,359,000
10%Incremental Sponsorship RevenueCostto Sell $75,000 $125,000 $175,000
Note:Revenuesandexpenseshavebeeninflatedby3percentperyearover30yearterm.
August 9, 2012
97
Year1OperatingComparison
Low Base High
Scenario Scenario Scenario
REVENUES:
Standi ng RoomOnl yTi ckets $60,000 $150,000 $270,000
Indi vi dual Game Ti ckets 2,420,000 4,090,000 6,600,000
SeasonTi ckets 1,780,000 2,200,000 2,940,000
Pri ori tySeat Donati ons 1,876,000 2,550,000 3,610,000
Premi umSeat Donati ons 1,846,000 2,416,000 3,078,000
Concessi ons, net 501,000 809,000 1,248,000
Merchandi se, net 43,000 108,000 204,000
Parki ng, net 343,000 863,000 1,642,000
Tai l gati ng 75,000 100,000 150,000
Adverti si ng /Sponsorshi p 3,050,000 3,550,000 4,050,000
Stadi umNami ng Ri ghts 400,000 500,000 750,000
Faci l i tyDevel opment Fee PerSi ngl eGame Footbal l Ti cket 133,000 340,000 690,000
Faci l i tyDevel opment Fee PerSi ngl eGame MBB, WBB, VB Ti cket 55,000 110,000 166,000
NonGame DayCl ubRental s 150,000 250,000 350,000
OtherEvents 100,000 150,000 200,000
TOTALREVENUES $12,832,000 $18,186,000 $25,948,000
EXPENSES:
Sal ari esandBenefi ts $200,000 $225,000 $300,000
Suppl i es 15,000 25,000 35,000
General Operati ng Servi ces 35,000 40,000 45,000
Professi onal Servi ces 75,000 100,000 125,000
Repai rs&Mai ntenance 200,000 250,000 300,000
Uti l i ti es 400,000 500,000 750,000
GameDayExpenses 480,000 600,000 900,000
2011NSMShare ofExi sti ng Sponsorshi pRevenue 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,359,000
10%Incremental Sponsorshi pRevenue Cost toSel l 75,000 125,000 175,000
TOTALEXPENSES $2,839,000 $3,224,000 $3,989,000
INCOME FROMNEWSTADIUMOPERATIONS $9,993,000 $14,962,000 $21,959,000
Less: Exi sti ng Income fromCurrent Stadi um $3,645,974 $3,645,974 $3,645,974
INCREMENTALNET STADIUMREVENUES $6,347,000 $11,316,000 $18,313,000
NewFootballStadiumProjectedFinancialOperations
Year1OperatingComparison
August 9, 2012
98
LowOperatingScenarioFinancialProjections
Year1 Year2 Year3 Year10 Year20 Year30
REVENUES:
Standi ng RoomOnl yTi ckets $60,000 $64,000 $69,000 $92,000 $123,000 $165,000
Indi vi dual Game Ti ckets 2,420,000 2,600,000 2,780,000 3,700,000 4,970,000 6,680,000
SeasonTi ckets 1,780,000 1,900,000 2,040,000 2,710,000 3,650,000 4,900,000
Pri ori tySeat Donati ons 1,876,000 1,932,000 1,989,000 2,447,000 3,288,000 4,418,000
Premi umSeat Donati ons 1,846,000 1,898,000 1,949,000 2,359,000 3,116,000 4,132,000
Concessi ons, net 501,000 632,000 666,000 859,000 1,155,000 1,552,000
Merchandi se, net 43,000 55,000 58,100 75,000 101,000 136,000
Parki ng, net 343,000 431,000 442,000 700,000 1,167,000 1,634,000
Tai l gati ng 75,000 77,000 80,000 98,000 132,000 177,000
Adverti si ng / Sponsorshi p 3,050,000 3,142,000 3,236,000 3,980,000 5,348,000 7,186,000
Stadi umNami ng Ri ghts 400,000 412,000 424,000 522,000 701,000 943,000
Faci l i tyDevel opment Fee PerSi ngl eGame Footbal l Ti cket 133,000 139,000 144,000 156,000 156,000 156,000
Faci l i tyDevel opment Fee PerSi ngl eGame MBB, WBB, VB Ti cket 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000
NonGame DayCl ubRental s 150,000 155,000 160,000 197,000 264,000 354,000
OtherEvents 100,000 103,000 106,000 131,000 176,000 236,000
TOTALREVENUES $12,832,000 $13,595,000 $14,198,000 $18,081,000 $24,402,000 $32,724,000
EXPENSES:
Sal ari esandBenefi ts $200,000 $206,000 $212,000 $261,000 $351,000 $473,000
Suppl i es 15,000 15,000 16,000 20,000 26,000 35,000
General Operati ng Servi ces 35,000 36,000 37,000 46,000 61,000 82,000
Professi onal Servi ces 75,000 77,000 80,000 98,000 132,000 177,000
Repai rs&Mai ntenance 200,000 206,000 212,000 261,000 351,000 471,000
Uti l i ti es 400,000 412,000 424,000 522,000 701,000 943,000
GameDayExpenses 480,000 494,000 509,000 626,000 842,000 1,131,000
2011NSMShare ofExi sti ng Sponsorshi pRevenue 1,359,000 1,400,000 1,442,000 1,773,000 2,383,000 3,202,000
10%Incremental Sponsorshi pRevenue Cost toSel l 75,000 77,000 80,000 98,000 132,000 177,000
TOTALEXPENSES $2,839,000 $2,923,000 $3,012,000 $3,705,000 $4,979,000 $6,691,000
INCOME FROMNEWSTADIUMOPERATIONS $9,993,000 $10,672,000 $11,186,000 $14,376,000 $19,423,000 $26,033,000
Less: Exi sti ng Income fromCurrent Stadi um $3,645,974 $3,755,353 $3,868,000 $4,759,000 $6,396,000 $8,596,000
INCREMENTALNET STADIUMREVENUES $6,347,000 $6,917,000 $7,318,000 $9,617,000 $13,027,000 $17,437,000
LowOperatingScenario
August 9, 2012
99
BaseOperatingScenarioFinancialProjections
REVENUES:
SeasonTi ckets 2,200,000 2,360,000 2,520,000 3,360,000 4,510,000 6,070,000
Concessi ons, net 809,000 967,000 1,023,000 1,325,000 1,781,000 2,393,000
Merchandi se, net 108,000 130,000 137,000 179,000 240,000 322,000
Parki ng, net 863,000 1,019,000 1,048,000 1,388,000 1,943,000 2,498,000
Tai l gati ng 100,000 103,000 106,000 130,000 175,000 236,000
Stadi umNami ng Ri ghts 500,000 515,000 530,000 652,000 877,000 1,178,000
OtherEvents 150,000 155,000 159,000 196,000 263,000 353,000
TOTALREVENUES $18,186,000 $19,278,000 $20,149,000 $25,585,000 $34,218,000 $45,625,000
EXPENSES:
Suppl i es 25,000 26,000 27,000 33,000 44,000 59,000
Uti l i ti es 500,000 515,000 530,000 652,000 877,000 1,178,000
GameDayExpenses 600,000 618,000 637,000 783,000 1,052,000 1,414,000
TOTALEXPENSES $3,224,000 $3,322,000 $3,421,000 $4,206,000 $5,654,000 $7,600,000
BaseOperatingScenario
August 9, 2012
100
HighOperatingScenarioFinancialProjections
REVENUES:
SeasonTi ckets 2,940,000 3,150,000 3,370,000 4,490,000 6,030,000 8,110,000
Concessi ons, net 1,248,000 1,432,000 1,517,000 1,973,000 2,652,000 3,564,000
Merchandi se, net 204,000 235,000 249,000 325,000 436,000 587,000
Parki ng, net 1,642,000 1,849,000 1,906,000 2,365,000 3,041,000 3,716,000
Tai l gati ng 150,000 155,000 159,000 196,000 263,000 353,000
Stadi umNami ng Ri ghts 750,000 773,000 796,000 979,000 1,315,000 1,767,000
OtherEvents 200,000 206,000 212,000 261,000 351,000 471,700
TOTALREVENUES $25,948,000 $27,459,000 $28,749,000 $36,431,000 $48,398,000 $64,259,000
EXPENSES:
Suppl i es 35,000 36,000 37,000 46,000 61,000 82,000
Uti l i ti es 750,000 773,000 796,000 979,000 1,315,000 1,767,000
GameDayExpenses 900,000 927,000 955,000 1,174,000 1,578,000 2,121,000
TOTALEXPENSES $3,989,000 $4,109,000 $4,233,000 $5,204,000 $6,993,000 $9,398,000
HighOperatingScenario
August 9, 2012
101
Funding Sources Presentaton
Project Funding Sources

1. Private
Donations
2. Corporate
Naming &
Sponsorships
3. Premium
Seating
Total Project Funding Sources
4. Event,
Facilities
Development
Fee and Other
Revenue
Revenue Streams
5. Ticket
Revenue

6. Misc. Revenue
(concessions,
merchandise,
tailgate &
parking)

University Operating
Revenue
Stadium Expenses
August 9, 2012
102
1. Private Donations
2
1. Private
Donations
Gift
Range
Projected Donation
Amounts
$10M+ $22M - $135M
$1M-$10M $10M - $42M
$500K-$1M $2M - $7M
$250K-$500K $2M - $9M
$100K-$250K $1M - $8M
$50K-$100K $2M - $9M
$5K-$50K $2M - $6M
Annual Giving $4M
August 9, 2012
103
2. Corporate and Naming
Sponsorships
3
2. Corporate
and Naming
Sponsorships
Potential Additional Naming and Sponsorship Opportunities
Inventory Annual One Time Donation Total *
Naming Rights $500,000 - $10,000,000
Playing Field $150,000 - $3,000,000
Tailgating Plaza $85,000 - $1,700,000
Scoreboard (included in Naming Rights) - $0
Club Concourse $35,000 - $700,000
General Concourse $55,000 - $1,100,000
Party Deck $30,000 - $600,000
Presidents Club Suite - $300,000 $300,000
Coachs Corner / Club Room - $150,000 $150,000
Letterwinners Lounge - $250,000 $250,000
Alumni Deck - $150,000 $150,000
Dining Room - $125,000 $125,000
Press Box - $150,000 $150,000
Locker Room - $200,000 $200,000
Meeting Rooms - $50,000 $50,000

Total $855,000 $1,375,000 $18,475,000
*Assumes 20-year agreement
August 9, 2012
104
3. Premium Seating
4
3. Premium
Seating
Priority and Premium Seat Matrix

Total Total Total Total Total Total
Actual Potential Actual Potential Actual Potential
Annual % Annual Annual Annual % Annual Annual Annual % Annual Annual
Inventory Donation sold Revenue Revenue Inventory Donation sold Revenue Revenue Inventory Donation sold Revenue Revenue
Priority Seats:

Goal line to 20's 3,000 $150 75% $337,500 $450,000 3,000 $200 85% $510,000 $600,000 3,000 $300 95% $855,000 $900,000
Between 20's and 40's 3,000 $300 75% $675,000 $900,000 3,000 $400 85% $1,020,000 $1,200,000 3,000 $500 95% $1,425,000 $1,500,000
Between 40's 2,000 $500 75% $750,000 $1,000,000 2,000 $600 85% $1,020,000 $1,200,000 2,000 $700 95% $1,330,000 $1,400,000

Total $1,762,500 $2,350,000 $2,550,000 $3,000,000 $3,610,000 $3,800,000

Premium Seats:

Field Level Club Memberships 500 $400 75% $150,000 $200,000 500 $500 85% $213,000 $250,000 500 $600 95% $285,000 $300,000
South End Zone Club
Memberships 400 $200 75% $60,000 $80,000 400 $300 85% $102,000 $120,000 400 $400 95% $152,000 $160,000
Outdoor Club Seats 800 $1,500 75% $900,000 $1,200,000 800 $1,700 85% $1,156,000 $1,360,000 800 $1,900 95% $1,444,000 $1,520,000
Indoor Club Seats 96 $1,750 75% $126,000 $168,000 96 $2,000 85% $163,000 $192,000 96 $2,250 95% $205,000 $216,000
Loge Boxes 40 $10,000 75% $300,000 $400,000 40 $11,500 85% $391,000 $460,000 40 $13,000 95% $494,000 $520,000
Club Suites 10 $20,000 75% $150,000 $200,000 10 $22,500 85% $191,000 $225,000 10 $25,000 95% $238,000 $250,000
Long's Peak Suites 6 $35,000 75% $158,000 $210,000 6 $40,000 85% $204,000 $240,000 6 $45,000 95% $257,000 $270,000

Total $1,844,000 $2,458,000 $2,420,000 $2,847,000 $3,075,000 $3,236,000

TOTAL REVENUE $3,606,500 $4,808,000 $4,970,000 $5,847,000 $6,685,000 $7,036,000
August 9, 2012
105
4. Event, Facilities Development
Fee and Other Revenue
5
4. Event, Facilities
Development Fee
and Other
Revenue
General Stadium Rental Revenue
Non Game Day Revenue
Facilities Development Fee for All Athletic Events
Not applied to student tickets

August 9, 2012
106
5. Ticket Revenue
6
5. Ticket Revenue
Standing Room Only Tickets
Individual Game Tickets
Season Tickets

August 9, 2012
107
Page Title
6. Miscellaneous Revenue
7

6. Miscellaneous
Revenue

Concessions
Merchandise
Parking
Tailgating

August 9, 2012
108
Page Title
Total Project
Funding Sources

1. Private
Donations
$45M-$220M
2. Corporate
Naming &
Sponsorships
$3.45M-$4.8M
3. Premium
Seating
$3.7M-$6.7M
Total Project Funding Sources
$173M-$437M
4. Event,
Facilities
Development
Fee and Other
Revenue
$.44M-$1.4M
Revenue Streams
Annual: $7.6M-$13M
Financed: $128M-$217M
5. Ticket
Revenue
$4.3M-$9.8M

6. Misc. Revenue
(concessions,
merchandise,
tailgate &
parking)
$.96M-$3.2M

University Operating
Revenue Streams
Annual: $2.5M-$9M
Stadium Expenses
Annual: $2.8M-$4M
August 9, 2012
109
Neighborhoood Meetngs Summary

8101 East Prentice Avenue, Suite 900 | Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | 303-796-2655 | www.iconvenue.com

In January 2012, Dr. Frank announced that one of the parameters for the feasibility study
was the consideration of impacts on the neighborhoods adjacent to the site of a prospective
on-campus stadium. Pursuant to this mandate and in furtherance of CSUs public
engagement process, ICON, Populous and PB conducted two (2) neighborhood meetings:
July 26
th
and July 30
th,
5:00 pm to 7:00 pm, at the Plymouth Congregational Church located
at 916 West Prospect Avenue in Fort Collins. CSU and the City of Fort Collins developed
the invite list which included 540 households immediately south of the CSU campus. The
meetings were the first opportunity for direct public engagement specific to the feasibility
process in a small setting with dedicated time for questions and comments. If the stadium
project moves forward in the upcoming months, there will be additional neighborhood
meetings including the neighbors to the north, west and east of the campus.

Each of the meetings was directed by Tim Romani of ICON with support from Scott
Radecic and Kevin Fast of Populous and Bob Brooks of PB. The attendees at the meetings
included neighbors and certain individuals who oppose an on-campus stadium at CSU. Mr.
Romani began each of the meetings by explaining the objective of having direct engagement
with the neighborhoods to provide an update on the feasibility process and discuss the
stadium impacts on transportation, parking, sound, and light. He emphasized the
importance of obtaining feedback from the attendees prior to the completion of the feasibility
report which would be presented to Dr. Frank at the SAC meeting on August 9. He also
reminded the attendees of an additional opportunity for public engagement at Dr. Franks
July 31 open forum on the stadium feasibility study at the Lory Center at CSU.

Mr. Romani outlined the stadium feasibility process adopted by the SAC along with Dr.
Franks four parameters within which the process had to be conducted. He also explained
the competitive bid process that resulted in the selection of ICON and Populous to direct the
feasibility study. Background information regarding the experience and expertise of ICON,
Populous, and PB was also provided.

Mr. Radecic (July 26 meeting) and Mr. Fast (July 30 meeting) explained the process for
selecting a prospective site for the stadium that started with six (6) possible sites and
culminated with the selection of site C. Mr. Radecic and Mr. Fast displayed the renderings
of the stadium and provided details regarding the design, program, amenities and floor plans
of the facility.

Mr. Brooks explained the assessment of the traffic and parking challenges related to an on-
campus stadium. He noted his meetings and discussions with the City of Fort Collins
Parking Department, City of Fort Collins Traffic Department, the State of Colorado
Transportation Department and CSU (athletic department, parking department, facilities
management, and university architect). Based on these meetings, the data collected, and his
analysis, he presented the projected parking demand and on-campus parking supply for a
new on-campus stadium. He also outlined the modal split assumptions, discussed the
existing roadway capacities, and identified the regional, primary, and secondary access
routes for the stadium. Mr. Brooks recommended the development of a comprehensive
transportation management plan if the stadium project moves forward that will include,
without limitation, a transportation strategy to reduce parking demand, refinement of modal
assumptions, and refinement of the site design related to access and circulation. Mr. Brooks
2 of 7
transportation and parking report, including supporting graphics, are on pages 17-28 of this
Report.

Mr. Radecic and Mr. Fast also provided an assessment of the sound and light impacts of the
on-campus stadium based on the work conducted by WJHW and M-E, respectively. If the
stadium project moves forward, they outlined the goal of achieving an efficient and
environmentally sensitive lighting design by defining design criteria to limit light spill and
glare. They also referenced the need to agree upon mitigation measures with CSU, the City
of Fort Collins and the surrounding neighborhoods that limit the impact of sound.

The remaining time of each meeting was devoted exclusively to questions and comments
from the attendees without any time restrictions on either the length or number of questions
posed by each person. The scope of the questions and comments was very broad and many
were unrelated to the transportation, parking, sound and light focus of the meetings.
Importantly, the attendees were provided an opportunity to ask questions and make
comments during the two-hour segment of the meeting and after the formal conclusion of
the meetings. In addition, attendees could submit written questions and/or comments if they
were not comfortable posing them in the public setting of the meetings.

All of the questions and comments from the meetings were compiled and we have organized
them in the following categories for ease of review: traffic and parking, sound and light, cost
and budget, design and construction, and general comments and questions. The following
outlines the questions, comments, and, if applicable, answers provided during the meetings:

Traffic and Parking
1. Was Hughes Stadium part of the Feasibility Study?
a. The focus was a new, on-campus stadium for this study
b. A feasibility study on Hughes Stadium was completed in 2001
2. When you look at a 20-minute walking radius from the stadium location, where
exactly are you looking? In neighborhoods?
a. No, the 20 minute walking radius encompasses 11,500 spaces that are on
campus and are controlled by CSU Parking.
3. Is there a town the size of Fort Collins that youve spread parking around like youre
proposing here that hasnt affected local business?
a. The University of Louisville has 6,000 surface spots around its stadium. The
rest of the parking is in private lots, throughout town and on-street parking.
4. Where do the students who live on campus park during game days?
a. Enough parking supply exists so that students will not need to be displaced.
b. Alternatively, one option is to enforce parking restrictions on game days so
that on campus residents would have to park elsewhere on game days.
c. Another option would be to allow the students to park in designated spaces if
parking supply and demand numbers show availability.
5. Can you explain the role of City Traffic Engineers involvement with Parsons
Brinckerhoff?
a. Interaction started on Hughes Stadium traffic work in 2007 and 2008 to
properly time traffic lights on game days
August 9, 2012
110
3 of 7
b. Meetings are ongoing with representatives of the City of Fort Collins to
understand current traffic conditions; however, exact current data will be
skewed due to current construction on the Mason Street Corridor.
6. Does City Public Safety get involved in feasibility process?
a. Yes, as does Homeland Security.
7. How long does it take to load in and load out for a typical game?
a. Of course the numbers vary based on what events may occur before the
game, but typical ingress time is 3 to 4 hours and 45 minutes to an hour for
egress.
8. How do the railroad tracks impact traffic?
a. During scheduled trains, traffic will be delayed.
b. Coordination with railroads is possible.
9. How many parking spots go with the stadium?
a. It is anticipated that a 1,500-space parking garage will be developed in
conjunction with the stadium.
10. How are people going to shop in Old Town if youre planning on having people park
in Old Town?
a. Old Town parking will not be counted in the available parking inventory
totals.
11. How much will it cost for the City of Fort Collins to improve road ways in Old
Town to accommodate the stadium?
a. Because no stadium parking will be accommodated by spaces in Old Town,
improvements to roadways in Old Town will not be contemplated by the
feasibility study.
12. Will Pitkin be the only access to the new parking garage?
a. No, the parking garage will have access from both Pitkin and Lake.
13. Is there a precedent to close off a neighborhood to non-resident parking on game
days using parking permits for residents?
a. Yes. That has been a very successful model at other stadiums. This model
will be contemplated in the formation of the Transportation Management
Plan.
b. The transportation engineer will look at current zoning to understand if
resident parking permits are possible.
14. Youve mentioned shuttling people from offsite locations to the stadium as a possible
solution for traffic and parking measures. Why would it be considered for an on
campus stadium, but isnt acceptable as a solution for Hughes Stadium?
15. Has there been consideration of having traffic go one way on Prospect or Shields to
accommodate heavy traffic flow? If so, how would residents in these neighborhoods
get out?
a. Yes, this model has been contemplated, but nothing has been finalized. The
implications on background traffic and neighborhoods must be explored.
16. Has a traffic study been conducted for Hughes Stadium and will that be compared to
the traffic study to be conducted for an on campus stadium?
a. Yes
17. Will Mason Street Corridor add busses during surge hours? It can currently handle
760 people per hour. It would take hours to get people to and from the stadium at
that rate.
a. Mason Street Corridor capacities will be further studied.
4 of 7
18. Youve noted potential parking in the flood plan and the Federal Building south of
Prospect? How will that impact wildlife and have you spoken with Federal officials
on whether that land would be available for parking on game days?
a. These parking areas require further study.
19. Students wont pay for parking. They get free tickets and theyll just continue to park
in our neighborhoods like they always do.
20. You cannot time traffic lights to improve traffic flows. Weve lived here 35 years and
know that is a farce.
a. In 2007 and 2008, Parsons Brinckerhoff was hired by the City of Fort Collins
to help improve traffic flows on game days to Hughes Stadium by timing
light signals on game days. Once implemented, the new timing system saved
15 to 25 minutes for game day commuters.
21. What happens to your traffic data with inclement weather?
a. Generally, overall attendance goes down with inclement weather, which
naturally offsets further traffic congestion.
22. Can you commit to closing the Sheely neighborhood on game days? Its one of
President Franks four parameters.
a. The transportation management plan will work to minimize impact on
neighborhoods
23. How much money has been set aside to protect the neighborhoods?
a. The operations budget includes funds to manage crowds, traffic and parking.

Sound and Light
1. When there are concerts at the Lagoon, we can hear the music at our house. Will the
Sound Engineer come into the neighborhoods and listen how noisy games will be?
a. Yes
2. Are lights included in the $246M budget?
a. Yes. The $246M budget includes all furniture, fixtures and equipment for the
stadium
3. There seems to be a large gap in the southwest wall of the stadium that will act as a
megaphone to project sound into my neighborhood.
4. Youve mentioned high decibel sound in short durations as a sound factor. Its the
frequency of the sounds thats bothersome.

Cost and Budget
1. Is there a 2 percent sinking fund in the budget?
a. The pro forma shows $1M/year for ongoing and deferred maintenance
2. Who will pay for the relocation of the PERC Facilities?
a. There are several items that are not included in the $246 million budget, the
items and expected budgets are as follows in round numbers:
i. PERC Facility replacement - $6M - $9M
ii. Parking Garage - $30M
iii. Phase 2 of the Meridian Walk - $10M
iv. Alumni Center - $16M
3. Diane Jones made a comment on May 30
th
that the $2.5M budget for street
improvements hadnt been vetted with the City. Is that true?
a. All information was provided to the City and no concerns have been raised.
4. Has anyone put together projected revenue streams?
August 9, 2012
111
5 of 7
a. Yes, the Market Analysis and Funding Sources subcommittee presented
these findings on May 30
th
to the Stadium Advisory Committee. Copies of
this report can be found at http://www.colostate.edu/stadium/
5. Is all the private money needed to fund the stadium ready to be spent when CSU
decides to move forward with the stadium?
a. No. No fundraising campaigns have been started for privately financing a
stadium.
6. If the City needs to add buses on the Mason Street Corridor, it will cost the City
money to accommodate this project.
7. Does the feasibility study discuss how financing this stadium will affect the bonding
capacity of the University?
a. No. Exact financing strategies and vehicles are not part of the feasibility
study.
Design and Construction
1. How tall is the height of the stadium?
a. The current concept design contemplates the building standing 123 feet at its
highest point - similar to Westfall Hall.
2. Do you know how long construction would last?
a. Between 20 and 24 months.
3. How would you access the campus with heavy construction equipment? Would you
have to tear down buildings to get a heavy truck on campus?
a. Construction routes would be selected by the General Contractor in order to
minimize impact on roadways and traffic just as has been done for all on-
campus construction projects.
b. It would not be necessary to demolish any existing building to allow for
heavy equipment access.
4. What are the Ram statues on the outside?
a. The artists rendering depicts two rams in the form of a sculpture on the
stadium plaza. This is a depiction of a public art piece that could be a feature
of the stadium plaza.

General Comments and Questions
1. At the May 30
th
Stadium Advisory Committee Meeting, CSL used Williams-Brice
Stadium in their portfolio of experience. This stadium is two miles from campus.
Why isnt CSL telling us what to do with Hughes Stadium?
a. CSL was hired to study the market feasibility of an on campus stadium for
CSU.
2. Why cant we use what we already have? We cant even fill our current stadium?
a. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an on-campus
stadium.
3. Why cant there be an independent poll conducted of residents?
4. You have no control of whether this thing gets built or not. How can we provide
feedback that will be heard?
a. Your next opportunity to provide feedback is a President Franks Open
Forum at Lory Student Center on July 31
st

5. Have you included how real estate values in surrounding neighborhoods would be
impacted in your feasibility study?
a. No
6 of 7
6. Have you ever come across so much resistance with a project youve worked on?
This issue has torn the neighborhoods apart.
a. Yes. All projects have detractors.
7. I am concerned about the year round use of the stadium. Who would be
responsible for non-football events?
a. The University and Athletic Department would manage the stadium and
would enter into a short term lease with private promoters. The University
would still be the operator of the building and the private promoters would
have to adhere to all rules of the facility.
8. You need to talk to the other neighbors North, West and East of campus.
9. Why isnt there anyone from the City of Fort Collins here tonight?
a. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss findings from the Universitys
feasibility study.
10. Unless youve lived here, you have no idea how bad the parking situation is. Just go
to Prospect and Whitcomb on September 1
st
and count cars. When a train comes
through, youll wait 30 minutes. Now you want to bring 40,000 people in at one
time?
11. Your demand numbers for parking are off. Theres no way that 20% - 30% of people
are walking or biking to the stadium. We need to know where you got those numbers
and how its possible that those numbers are reached without created in impact on
the local neighborhoods.
12. I suggest asking the City about future projects planned in the area so you can
coordinate on traffic and parking.
13. We need more classrooms, labs and green space on campus. If you put a stadium on
campus, theres no room for future growth and the green space will be gone.
14. Fort Collins isnt a Football Town. When there is a game going on at Hughes
Stadium, we dont even know it. So if theres a football game going on at campus,
its going to cause problems for the rest of us who dont like football.
15. I am fairly new to the neighborhood and have found out the City has offered to
install gutters, sidewalks and street lights. However, the neighborhoods have refused
those services. These neighborhoods have an active interest in historic preservation
and understand the impacts of students. We expect that red solo cups will be a part
of the stadium package.
16. Everyone in attendance was asked to raise hands if they were in favor of the stadium.
No hands were raised, however one attendee mentioned that she was still trying to
understand the impacts and hadnt decided.
17. I have asked Diane Jones for over two months what the cost of infrastructure for the
City of Fort Collins would be if this stadium moves forward and she hasnt been able
to answer. We believe the City has greatly underestimated what this stadium would
cost the City in infrastructure.
18. If President Frank were to give each neighbor a free ticket to the stadium, we would
be in favor of it.
19. Thank you for having this meeting. It should have been done a long time ago. Do
you realize how frustrating this has been, not being able to ask any questions since
January when the stadium was announced? We havent had collaboration. Our
neighborhood is CSUs overflow parking August through May. We dont want that
on weekends during football. Im hoping that police will block off our neighborhoods
during games so that there will be no tailgating too.
August 9, 2012
112
7 of 7
20. You say youve been engaging since January, but we havent had any chance to give
input.
21. This stadium will impact everyone in the community for the rest of our lives.
22. As a representative of the Plymouth Congregational Church, we are concerned.
People already try to park in our lot and use our lot as a through street. We need to
protect the church property and Im not sure how that works with the current plan.
We are very concerned with crowd control on wear and tear on our property on
Lake Street with regard to litter and vandalism. Year round concerts could be even
worse. We hope you could help us solve this problem. This will greatly impact our
events on weekends like weddings and funerals.
23. There is concern about the wildlife of the Spring Creek Corridor.
24. No one is looking at this from a financial impact perspective on the community.
25. One of President Franks parameters is to not impact green space, but youre
planning on putting a stadium on top of the PERC gardens.
26. Does the University have the capacity in its sewer system to handle a stadium?
a. The budget allocates $15M for upgrades to the existing utility system on and
off campus.

General Comments and Questions (Submitted in writing)
1. If the $246M does not cover it, then it should not appear in the artists renderings
that you present to the people. Be honest on every level, especially the visual.
2. Will there be a bike lane added for Prospect North of Shields and Shields North of
Prospect?
3. Will the stadium/CSU meet and enforce community ambient noise standards?
4. Does Study include impact on academics on campus i.e., Noise into library,
laboratories during event times? Research is a 24 hr / 7 day a week process
5. What will be the decibel level into neighborhoods during events?
6. Traffic on Prospect is already poor.
7. My deepest concern is that this study is still ongoing. How can Mr. Frank make a
Yes or No decision at this time if your study is still ongoing?
8. Most at CSU dont care about football ref: your emails and polls
9. Did I really hear someone explain they would consider parking at Hughes and
shuttling some goes to the on-campus stadium?
10. A little late in the game to start getting public involvement with consultants.
11. Where is the tailgate area?
12. This project is based on the premise that CSU wins football games. What if they
dont win? How will this get paid for? Please send me the data that shows that
schools that build on-campus stadiums make lots and lots of money AND that the
money gets to the academic side of the University? How much money will this
stadium make for the academic side of the university?

August 9, 2012
113
Constructon Estmate
REPORT
Feasibility Study
New On Campus Football Stadium
Fort Collins, Colorado
Prepared for:
Romani Group, Inc. / ICON VenueGroup
8101 Prentice Ave., Suite 900
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
May 22, 2012
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
Description
Basis of Estimate
This report has been prepared to provide a conceptual design construction cost estimate for a new football
stadium. The project is located on the Colorado State University campus in Fort Collins, Colorado.
The estimate is based upon measured quantities and built-up rates prepared from the Colorado State University
New Stadium Feasibility Study dated May 11, 2012, prepared by Populous. Budgets for AV have been provided
by WJHW.

The Building Gross Square Footage is 773,637 square feet.
It is understood that the project will be procured using a CM/GC contract procurement approach in which the
CM/GC will be required to receive at least three bids from subcontractors for each trade.
In preparation of this estimate, it is assumed that CM/GC will only be allowed to self-perform work for the project
under competitive bidding circumstances.
The estimate is based on May 2012 construction costs.
Items Specifically Excluded
. Asbestos and hazardous material abatement
. Rerouting of existing utilities in Pitkin Street
. Upgrading existing utilities
. Food Service Equipment
. Furniture, Fittings and Equipment (FF&E)
. Green Roofs
. Photovoltaics and other renewable energy sources
. Data and Telecom equipment
. Mock-ups
. Murals and works of art
. Interior signage, including building directory
. Work outside site boundaries unless noted otherwise
. Design contingency
. Owner's contingency
. Permits and plan review fees
. Utility tap fees and charges
. Land and legal costs
. Geotechnical, Traffic, and all other Studies
. Architectural, Design, Engineering, PM, and all other fees
. Items marked as "Excl." in the estimate
. Escalation beyond the date of the estimate

DEN9340-1
Printed: May 22, 2012 1:34 pm
Page 1 of 1
August 9, 2012
114
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Rates Current At May 2012
Cost/SF
Standard Foundations A1010 $3.40 $2,631,635.00
Special Foundations A1020 $5.01 $3,874,321.00
Slab on Grade A1030 $8.56 $6,622,717.00
Floor Construction B1010 $43.76 $33,856,351.00
Roof Construction B1020 $4.61 $3,562,960.00
Exterior Walls B2010 $23.46 $18,150,440.00
Exterior Windows B2020 $0.06 $50,000.00
Exterior Doors B2030 $0.32 $249,250.00
Roof Coverings B3010 $0.78 $604,106.00
Partitions C1010 $6.45 $4,987,520.00
Interior Doors C1020 $1.47 $1,140,000.00
Fittings C1030 $8.56 $6,623,608.00
Stair Construction C2010 $0.66 $513,000.00
Stair Finishes C2020 $0.03 $20,000.00
Floor, Wall & Ceiling Finishes C3005 $4.75 $3,672,595.00
Ceiling Finishes C3030 $0.33 $253,467.00
Elevators & Lifts D1010 $2.22 $1,715,000.00
Escalators & Movings Walks D1020 $0.52 $400,000.00
Plumbing Fixtures D2010 $0.64 $493,847.00
Domestic Water Distribution D2020 $2.38 $1,840,183.00
Sanitary Waste D2030 $3.10 $2,398,275.00
Rain Water Drainage D2040 $1.10 $851,001.00
Energy Supply D3010 $1.95 $1,508,593.00
Heat Generating Systems D3020 $0.18 $140,000.00
Cooling Generating Systems D3030 $0.28 $220,000.00
Distribution Systems D3040 $9.60 $7,428,944.00
Terminal & Package Units D3050 $2.00 $1,550,000.00
Controls & Instrumentations D3060 $2.78 $2,150,484.00
Systems Testing & Balancing D3070 $0.20 $156,399.00
Other HVAC Systems & Equipment D3090 $0.30 $232,543.00
Sprinklers D4010 $2.19 $1,697,726.00
Standpipes D4020 $0.06 $43,200.00
Fire Protection Specialties D4030 $0.13 $103,500.00
Other Fire Protection Systems D4090 $0.00 $3,600.00
Electrical Service & Distribution D5010 $3.68 $2,844,445.00
Lighting and Branch Wiring D5020 $6.09 $4,709,527.00
Communications & Security D5030 $8.80 $6,808,005.00
Other Electrical Systems D5090 $20.27 $15,680,212.00
Vehicular Equipment E1030 $0.08 $60,000.00
Fixed Furnishings E2010 $3.97 $3,069,657.00
Special Construction Systems F1030 $1.84 $1,425,000.00
DEN9340-1
Page 2 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Cost/SF
Site Clearing G1010 $0.13 $98,000.00
Site Earthwork G1030 $0.67 $518,525.00
Hazardous Waste Remediation Excl. G1040
Roadways G2010 $0.52 $400,000.00
Site Development G2040 $6.92 $5,350,000.00
Water Supply G3010 $0.52 $401,000.00
Sanitary Water G3020 $0.87 $674,500.00
Storm Sewer G3030 $1.30 $1,008,500.00
Heating Distribution G3040 $0.28 $213,700.00
Cooling Distribution G3050 $0.28 $216,600.00
Fuel Distribution G3060 $0.01 $10,000.00
Electrical Distribution G4010 $1.64 $1,265,560.00
Site Lighting G4020 $0.06 $50,000.00
Site Communications & Security G4030 $0.05 $40,000.00
Estimated Net Cost $199.82 $154,588,496.00
Margins & Adjustments
General Conditions & Requirements 7.0% $10,821,195.00
Insurances & Bonds 1.8% $2,977,374.00
Estimating Contingency 10.0% $16,838,707.00
CM/GC Bidding Contingency 3.5% $6,482,902.00
CM/GC Fee 2.5% $4,792,717.00
Estimate Rounding $-1,391.00
Grand Total $254.00 $196,500,000.00
DEN9340-1
Page 3 of 16
August 9, 2012
115
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
A1010 Standard Foundations
SF 255,218 $10.00 $2,552,180.00 13 Standard foundations to slab on grade - pits,
mats, walls, etc
LF 5,297 $15.00 $79,455.00 19 Foundation perimeter drains
Standard Foundations Total $3.40/SF $2,631,635.00
A1020 Special Foundations
LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 3 Mobilization and demobilization of drill rig
LF 3,192 $248.00 $791,616.00 4 Cased drilled pier, complete, 54" dia
LF 8,288 $192.00 $1,591,296.00 5 Cased drilled pier, complete, 48" dia
CY 962 $120.00 $115,440.00 9 Concrete pier cap
Lb 240,500 $0.77 $185,185.00 10 Rebar to pier cap
SF 25,088 $4.50 $112,896.00 11 Formwork to sides of pier cap
CY 962 $16.00 $15,392.00 12 Excavate for pier cap and haul off
Special Foundations Total $5.01/SF $3,874,321.00
A1030 Slab on Grade
SF 240,843 $12.00 $2,890,116.00 1 6" Concrete slab on grade, complete, including
4" gravel & vapor barrier
SF 14,375 $16.00 $230,000.00 2 9" Concrete slab on grade, (loading dock)
complete, including 4" gravel & vapor barrier
CY 103,864 $16.00 $1,661,824.00 14 Excavate beneath slab on grade and field 8'
deep and haul off site
CY 56,716 $9.00 $510,444.00 15 Excavate beneath slab on grade 6' deep,
recondition and recompact
CY 21,183 $16.00 $338,928.00 16 Excavate beneath field 6' deep and haul off
CY 21,183 $35.00 $741,405.00 17 Imported engineered fill to field
LS 1$250,000.00 $250,000.00 18 Allowance for temporary dewatering during
excavation
Slab on Grade Total $8.56/SF $6,622,717.00
B1010 Floor Construction
SF 12,738 $40.00 $509,520.00 21 Floor Structure, complete, to Field Suite Level
SF 202,809 $45.00 $9,126,405.00 22 Floor structure, complete, to Main Level
SF 28,163 $40.00 $1,126,520.00 23 Floor structure, complete to Club Level
SF 28,026 $35.00 $980,910.00 24 Floor structure, complete, to Loge Level,
including spray fireproofing
SF 24,943 $35.00 $873,005.00 25 Floor structure, complete, to Press Level,
including spray fireproofing
SF 202,809 $12.00 $2,433,708.00 26 4" Concrete topping slab including mesh,
drainage board and waterproof membrane
Page Total $28,178,741
DEN9340-1
Page 4 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
B1010 Floor Construction (cont)
SF 221,740 $60.00 $13,304,400.00 27 Upper and Lower Seating Bowl structure
SF 160,489 $15.00 $2,407,335.00 28 Premium to waterproof Seating Bowls over
occupied space (100% of upper and 50% of
lower)
SF 773,637 $4.00 $3,094,548.00 29 Core, shear and general structural walls
Floor Construction Total $43.76/SF $33,856,351.00
B1020 Roof Construction
SF 28,026 $30.00 $840,780.00 31 High-Level Roof structure, complete
SF 20,100 $25.00 $502,500.00 33 Structure and skin to fascia and roof soffit
LS 1$500,000.00 $500,000.00 32 Allowance for canopies
T 240.00 $3,500.00 $840,000.00 35 120' Long cantilevered trusses to support east
stands' lights
SF 43,984 $20.00 $879,680.00 36 Roof structure over concessions and restrooms
Roof Construction Total $4.61/SF $3,562,960.00
B2010 Exterior Walls
SF 157,939 $60.00 $9,476,340.00 38 Stone masonry exterior wall with structural
backup
SF 11,520 $55.00 $633,600.00 39 Stair/elevator exterior walls - brick or metal with
structural backup
SF 12,800 $45.00 $576,000.00 40 Video screen masonry wall
SF 3,200 $40.00 $128,000.00 41 Video screen metal panel enclosure
SF 69,680 $75.00 $5,226,000.00 42 Curtainwall to Loge and Press
SF 44,076 $35.00 $1,542,660.00 43 Exterior wall to concessions
SF 18,928 $30.00 $567,840.00 44 Wood louver system to back of upper bowl
Exterior Walls Total $23.46/SF $18,150,440.00
B2020 Exterior Windows
LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 45 Allowance for exterior punched window
Exterior Windows Total $0.06/SF $50,000.00
B2030 Exterior Doors
LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 46 General allowance for misc exterior doors,
grilles, etc.
EA 85 $1,050.00 $89,250.00 49 Single exterior door to concessions and
restrooms
EA 22 $5,000.00 $110,000.00 50 Rollup screen and counter to concessions
Exterior Doors Total $0.32/SF $249,250.00
B3010 Roof Coverings
SF 28,026 $9.00 $252,234.00 34 Roof deck including insulation and waterproofing
DEN9340-1
Page 5 of 16
August 9, 2012
116
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
B3010 Roof Coverings (cont)
SF 43,984 $8.00 $351,872.00 37 Roof covering over concessions and restrooms
Roof Coverings Total $0.78/SF $604,106.00
C1010 Partitions
SF 233,790 $12.00 $2,805,480.00 132 CMU Partition
SF 116,895 $7.00 $818,265.00 133 Gypboard partition
SF 38,965 $35.00 $1,363,775.00 134 Glazed partition
Partitions Total $6.45/SF $4,987,520.00
C1020 Interior Doors
EA 1,200 $950.00 $1,140,000.00 135 Interior door, complete
Interior Doors Total $1.47/SF $1,140,000.00
C1030 Fittings
LF 6,309 $350.00 $2,208,150.00 153 Steel balustrade to bowls/main level
LF 4,897 $125.00 $612,125.00 154 Pipe handrail to bowls
EA 30,000 $25.00 $750,000.00 158 Bleacher seating - seatboard
EA 6,000 $150.00 $900,000.00 159 Priority chairback seating
EA 2,386 $200.00 $477,200.00 160 Club/suite seating
LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 185 Specialties to Green Suites
LS 1 $20,588.00 $20,588.00 186 Specialties to Press Support, Visiting Coaches,
Home Coaches
LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 188 Specialties to Gold Suites
LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 190 Specialties to Head Coaches Family Suite
LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 191 Specialties to President Suite
LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 192 Specialties to Athletic Department Suite
LS 1 $20,250.00 $20,250.00 193 Specialties to Gold Suite Lounge
LS 1 $17,100.00 $17,100.00 194 Specialties to Loge Boxes
LS 1 $13,100.00 $13,100.00 196 Specialties to Indoor Ram's Club
LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 198 Specialties to Indoor Ram's Seating
LS 1 $25,200.00 $25,200.00 199 Specialties to Staff Faculty Club
LS 1 $5,560.00 $5,560.00 200 Specialties to Recruit Closing Room
LS 1$103,000.00 $103,000.00 201 Specialties to Stadium Club
LS 1 $41,250.00 $41,250.00 202 Specialties to Letter Winner's Club
LS 1$115,000.00 $115,000.00 204 Specialties to Restroom "Block"
LS 1 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 205 Specialties to Concession
LS 1 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 206 Specialties to Ram's Suites
LS 1 $49,200.00 $49,200.00 207 Specialties to Sideline Club - Field Suite Level
LS 1 $26,800.00 $26,800.00 208 Specialties to Training/Equip.
LS 1 $20,400.00 $20,400.00 209 Specialties to Recruiting
LS 1 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 210 Specialties to Post game Interview
DEN9340-1
Page 6 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
C1030 Fittings (cont)
LS 1 $10,300.00 $10,300.00 211 Specialties to Team Store
LS 1 $53,100.00 $53,100.00 212 Specialties to Hall of Fame
LS 1 $13,250.00 $13,250.00 213 Specialties to General Building Storage
LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 214 Specialties to Dock
LS 1 $97,250.00 $97,250.00 215 Specialties to Home Team Locker Room
LS 1 $43,560.00 $43,560.00 217 Specialties to Sideline Club - Service Level
LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 218 Specialties to Food Service
LS 1 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 219 Specialties to media Support
LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 220 Specialties to Vendor Commissary
LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 221 Specialties to Concession Storage
LS 1 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 222 Specialties to Field Suites
LS 1 $12,200.00 $12,200.00 223 Specialties to Media Club
LS 1 $45,450.00 $45,450.00 224 Specialties to Storage
LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 225 Specialties to Rec Sports
LS 1 $53,400.00 $53,400.00 226 Specialties to Visiting Team Locker Room
LS 1 $42,500.00 $42,500.00 227 Specialties to Auxiliary Locker Room
LS 1 $10,625.00 $10,625.00 228 Specialties to coaches Locker Room
LS 1 $2,125.00 $2,125.00 229 Specialties to Janitor's Closet
LS 1 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 230 Specialties to maintenance Shop
LS 1 $4,575.00 $4,575.00 231 Specialties to Retail Store
LS 1 $9,450.00 $9,450.00 232 Specialties to Guest Services
LS 1 $34,700.00 $34,700.00 233 Specialties to Offices
LS 1$500,000.00 $500,000.00 291 Signage
Fittings Total $8.56/SF $6,623,608.00
C2010 Stair Construction
FT/R 570 $900.00 $513,000.00 47 Stair construction
Stair Construction Total $0.66/SF $513,000.00
C2020 Stair Finishes
LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 48 Allowance for stair finishes
Stair Finishes Total $0.03/SF $20,000.00
C3005 Floor, Wall & Ceiling Finishes
SF 7,906 $47.26 $373,638.00 105 Finish Level : FL-01
SF 9,388 $15.74 $147,767.00 109 Finish Level : FL-05(A)
DEN9340-1
Page 7 of 16
August 9, 2012
117
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
C3005 Floor, Wall & Ceiling Finishes (cont)
SF 563 $28.30 $15,933.00 122 Finish Level : FL-18
SF 13,844 $16.69 $231,056.00 130 Finish Level : FL-05(B)
SF 466,021 $0.75 $349,516.00 131 Finish Level : Concrete Sealer
Floor, Wall & Ceiling Finishes Total $4.75/SF $3,672,595.00
C3030 Ceiling Finishes
SF 28,163 $9.00 $253,467.00 30 Heated Soffit to underside of Club Level
Ceiling Finishes Total $0.33/SF $253,467.00
D1010 Elevators & Lifts
EA 3$120,000.00 $360,000.00 136 Elevator - east side - Service Level to Main Level
EA 4$300,000.00 $1,200,000.00 137 Elevator - west side - Service Level to
Suite/Press Level
EA 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 152 Elevator - loading dock - Service level to Main
Level
EA 4 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 292 Cab finish allowance to west side elevators
Elevators & Lifts Total $2.22/SF $1,715,000.00
D1020 Escalators & Movings Walks
SF 4$100,000.00 $400,000.00 139 Escalator - Sideline Club - Field Club to Service
Level to Field Suite Level
Escalators & Movings Walks Total $0.52/SF $400,000.00
D2010 Plumbing Fixtures
SF 390,997 $1.10 $430,097.00 157 Plumbing fixtures
DEN9340-1
Page 8 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
D2010 Plumbing Fixtures (cont)
EA 51 $1,250.00 $63,750.00 172 Sink at suites
Plumbing Fixtures Total $0.64/SF $493,847.00
D2020 Domestic Water Distribution
Item $12,500.00 173 Water entry including meters, BFP's, valves,
specialties, piping, etc
EA 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 174 Triplex booster pump
EA 12 $6,000.00 $72,000.00 175 Allowance for steam to hot water heat
exchangers
SF 773,637 $2.25 $1,740,683.00 176 Domestic water distribution including pipe,
fittings, valves, hangers & supports, insulation,
hose bibs, wall hydrants, etc
Domestic Water Distribution Total $2.38/SF $1,840,183.00
D2030 Sanitary Waste
SF 773,637 $3.10 $2,398,275.00 179 Sanitary waste and vent distribution including
sump pumps, pipe, fittings, tanks, hangers &
supports, etc
Sanitary Waste Total $3.10/SF $2,398,275.00
D2040 Rain Water Drainage
SF 773,637 $1.10 $851,001.00 180 Stormwater drainage distribution including roof
and overflow drains, pipe, fittings, insulation,
hangers & supports, etc
Rain Water Drainage Total $1.10/SF $851,001.00
D3010 Energy Supply
SF 773,637 $1.50 $1,160,456.00 177 Allowance for steam and condensate distribution
including piping, traps, pumps, etc
SF 773,637 $0.45 $348,137.00 178 Natural gas distribution including pipe, fittings,
regulators, valves, hangers & supports, etc
Energy Supply Total $1.95/SF $1,508,593.00
D3020 Heat Generating Systems
Item $20,000.00 181 Connection to campus steam and condensate
return including piping, valves, piping specialties,
etc
Item $120,000.00 182 Steam to hot water/glycol heat exchangers
including specialties
Heat Generating Systems Total $0.18/SF $140,000.00
D3030 Cooling Generating Systems
Item $40,000.00 183 Connection to campus chilled water including air
separators, expansion tanks, valves, specialties,
etc
DEN9340-1
Page 9 of 16
August 9, 2012
118
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
D3030 Cooling Generating Systems (cont)
Item $180,000.00 184 Plate and frame heat exchangers including
piping and specialties
Cooling Generating Systems Total $0.28/SF $220,000.00
D3040 Distribution Systems
SF 390,997 $12.50 $4,887,463.00 164 Air distribution including VAV's, duct, hangers &
supports, GRD's, etc
SF 390,997 $6.50 $2,541,481.00 165 Hydronic distribution including pumps, coils,
piping, hangers & supports, insulation, etc
Distribution Systems Total $9.60/SF $7,428,944.00
D3050 Terminal & Package Units
cfm 400,000 $3.50 $1,400,000.00 287 Air handling equipment
EA 12 $12,500.00 $150,000.00 170 Packaged split system air conditioning unit
complete
Terminal & Package Units Total $2.00/SF $1,550,000.00
D3060 Controls & Instrumentations
SF 390,997 $5.50 $2,150,484.00 195 HVAC controls
Controls & Instrumentations Total $2.78/SF $2,150,484.00
D3070 Systems Testing & Balancing
SF 390,997 $0.40 $156,399.00 197 HVAC test and balance
Systems Testing & Balancing Total $0.20/SF $156,399.00
D3090 Other HVAC Systems & Equipment
EA 23 $3,900.00 $89,700.00 187 Kitchen exhaust and makeup
SF 33,610 $4.25 $142,843.00 189 Locker room heat recovery
Other HVAC Systems & Equipment Total $0.30/SF $232,543.00
D4010 Sprinklers
EA 1 $88,725.00 $88,725.00 169 Fire pump 1000gpm
EA 1 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 168 Fire entry including valves, piping, etc
SF 551,897 $2.90 $1,600,501.00 163 Fire sprinkler system
Sprinklers Total $2.19/SF $1,697,726.00
D4020 Standpipes
EA 6 $7,200.00 $43,200.00 166 Fire protection standpipe
Standpipes Total $0.06/SF $43,200.00
DEN9340-1
Page 10 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
D4030 Fire Protection Specialties
EA 23 $4,500.00 $103,500.00 167 Fire protection system at kitchen hood
Fire Protection Specialties Total $0.13/SF $103,500.00
D4090 Other Fire Protection Systems
EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 171 Premium for pre-action system at main IT room,
demarcation room, and scoreboard control room
Other Fire Protection Systems Total $0.00/SF $3,600.00
D5010 Electrical Service & Distribution
EA 4$218,375.00 $873,500.00 146 Service switchboard 4000A, 277/480V-3-4w
EA 23 $15,905.00 $365,815.00 147 Transformer 120/208V at concession panel
EA 23 $17,560.00 $403,880.00 149 Panel 400A, 120/208V at concession area
Item $348,750.00 162 Electrical connections to mechanical equipment
including MCC's, panels, disconnects, conduit &
wire, etc
Item $852,500.00 286 Electrical feeders including conduit, wire,
hangers & supports, etc
Electrical Service & Distribution Total $3.68/SF $2,844,445.00
D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring
SF 95,320 $14.25 $1,358,310.00 216 Sports field lighting
SF 15,270 $13.50 $206,145.00 235 Lighting and power at suites
SF 63,924 $13.00 $831,012.00 244 Lighting and power at clubs and lounges
SF 8,680 $10.50 $91,140.00 279 Lighting and power at media and press areas
SF 14,066 $9.00 $126,594.00 280 Lighting and power at offices and ticketing
SF 9,444 $12.00 $113,328.00 281 Lighting and power at retail areas
SF 71,898 $4.25 $305,567.00 282 Lighting and power at restrooms and locker
rooms
SF 57,604 $5.50 $316,822.00 283 Lighting and power at mechanical, electrical, and
storage rooms
SF 25,907 $8.50 $220,210.00 284 Lighting and power at food prep, kitchen, and
concession areas
SF 506,844 $2.25 $1,140,399.00 285 Lighting and power at concourse and circulation
areas
Lighting and Branch Wiring Total $6.09/SF $4,709,527.00
D5030 Communications & Security
SF 773,637 $3.25 $2,514,320.00 161 Fire alarm system
SF 773,637 $4.25 $3,287,957.00 288 Telecommunications including cable tray,
backbone, distribution cabling, rough-in, etc
SF 773,637 $1.30 $1,005,728.00 289 Building security
Communications & Security Total $8.80/SF $6,808,005.00
DEN9340-1
Page 11 of 16
August 9, 2012
119
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
D5090 Other Electrical Systems
Note 93 Audio / Visual Systems - Budgets prepared by
WJHW
LS 1 $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 94 Seating Bowl Sound System - Distributed
LS 1 $1,200,000.00 $1,200,000.00 95 Seating Bowl Sound System - End Cluster
LS 1$400,000.00 $400,000.00 96 Back of House Sound System
LS 1$750,000.00 $750,000.00 97 Distributed TV System ( IPTV)
LS 1 $2,100,000.00 $2,100,000.00 98 TV Sets Installed (300EA x $7,000)
LS 1 $1,300,000.00 $1,300,000.00 99 Video Production System
LS 1 $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 100 Broadcast Cabling
LS 1$650,000.00 $650,000.00 101 AV/Broadcast Systems Conduit
LS 1 $3,600,000.00 $3,600,000.00 102 Scoreboard/Video Display Systems
LS 1$175,000.00 $175,000.00 103 Sound System and TV System structural support
LS 1$500,000.00 $500,000.00 104 Scoreboard/Video Display Systems structural
support
LF 2,886 $18.25 $52,670.00 155 Ground ring to perimeter
SF 773,637 $0.15 $116,046.00 156 Building, lightning protection, and equipment
connections to ground ring
SF 390,997 $1.50 $586,496.00 203 Allowance for emergency and standby loads
including generator, ATS, switchgear, panels,
conduit & wire, etc
Other Electrical Systems Total $20.27/SF $15,680,212.00
E1030 Vehicular Equipment
EA 2 $30,000.00 $60,000.00 151 Roller door, dock leveler, dock bumpers, etc
Vehicular Equipment Total $0.08/SF $60,000.00
E1090 Other Equipment
Item Excl. 140 Food service equipment - excluded
Item Excl. 141 Window washing equipment - excluded
Item Excl. 142 Trash compactors, balers, etc. - excluded
Item Excl. 148 Laundry equipment - excluded
Item Excl. 150 Athletic training / treatment equipment - excluded
Other Equipment Total
E2010 Fixed Furnishings
LS 1$200,000.00 $200,000.00 234 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Green Suites
LS 1 $51,400.00 $51,400.00 236 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Press Support,
Visiting Coaches, Home Coaches
LS 1$200,000.00 $200,000.00 237 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Gold Suites
LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 238 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Head Coach
Family Suite
LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 239 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to President Suite
DEN9340-1
Page 12 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
E2010 Fixed Furnishings (cont)
LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 240 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Athletic Dept.
Suite
LS 1 $40,500.00 $40,500.00 241 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Gold Suite
Lounge
LS 1 $34,400.00 $34,400.00 242 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Loge Boxes
LS 1 $52,100.00 $52,100.00 243 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Indoor Ram's
Club
LS 1 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 245 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Indoor Ram's
Seating
LS 1 $75,656.00 $75,656.00 246 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Staff Faculty
Club
LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 247 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Recruit Closing
Room
LS 1$309,000.00 $309,000.00 248 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Stadium Club
LS 1$123,000.00 $123,000.00 249 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Letter Winner's
Club
LS 1 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 250 Casework./Fixed Furnishings to Restroom
"Block"
LS 1 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 251 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Concession
LS 1 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 252 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Rams Suite
LS 1$118,000.00 $118,000.00 253 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Sideline Club -
Field Suite Level
LS 1 $89,625.00 $89,625.00 254 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Training / Equip.
LS 1 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 255 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Recruiting
LS 1 $70,313.00 $70,313.00 256 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Post Game
Interview
LS 1 $34,400.00 $34,400.00 257 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Team Store
LS 1$159,400.00 $159,400.00 258 casework/Fixed Furnishings to Hall of Fame
LS 1 $33,125.00 $33,125.00 259 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to General Building
Storage
LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 260 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Dock
LS 1$194,500.00 $194,500.00 261 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Home Team
Locker Room
LS 1$130,000.00 $130,000.00 262 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Sideline Club -
Service Level
LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 263 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Food Service
LS 1 $9,688.00 $9,688.00 264 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Media Support
LS 1 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 265 Casework.Fixed Furnishings to Vendor
Commissary
LS 1 $6,406.00 $6,406.00 266 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Concession
Storage
LS 1$120,000.00 $120,000.00 267 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Field Suites
LS 1 $61,100.00 $61,100.00 268 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Media Club
LS 1$113,625.00 $113,625.00 269 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Storage
DEN9340-1
Page 13 of 16
August 9, 2012
120
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
E2010 Fixed Furnishings (cont)
LS 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 270 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Rec Sports
LS 1$106,875.00 $106,875.00 271 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Visiting Team
Locker Room
LS 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 272 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Auxiliary Locker
Room
LS 1 $21,200.00 $21,200.00 273 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Coaches Locker
Room
LS 1 $10,625.00 $10,625.00 274 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Janitor's Closet
LS 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 275 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Maintenance
Shop
LS 1 $22,875.00 $22,875.00 276 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Retail Store
LS 1 $63,000.00 $63,000.00 277 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Guest Services
LS 1 $57,844.00 $57,844.00 278 Casework/Fixed Furnishings to Offices
Fixed Furnishings Total $3.97/SF $3,069,657.00
F1030 Special Construction Systems
SF 95,000 $15.00 $1,425,000.00 92 Turf field, complete, including irrigation, drainage,
etc
Special Construction Systems Total $1.84/SF $1,425,000.00
G1010 Site Clearing
Acre 12.0 $4,000.00 $48,000.00 51 Clear site of on-grade asphalt paving, road,
curbs and minor structures
LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 52 Allow for TESC measures
Site Clearing Total $0.13/SF $98,000.00
G1030 Site Earthwork
CY 74,075 $7.00 $518,525.00 54 Grade site to new levels (balanced cut/fill)
Site Earthwork Total $0.67/SF $518,525.00
G1040 Hazardous Waste Remediation
Note Excl. 53 Costs associated with site hazmat abatement
excluded from construction estimate
Hazardous Waste Remediation Total
G2010 Roadways
LF 2,000 $200.00 $400,000.00 85 Patch and repair Pitkin and West Lake Streets
after construction
Roadways Total $0.52/SF $400,000.00
G2040 Site Development
Note 86 Based on SD2-00A Site Materials Plan:
DEN9340-1
Page 14 of 16
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
G2040 Site Development (cont)
SF 120,000 $30.00 $3,600,000.00 87 Hardscape - paving, signage, lighting, benches,
etc
SF 100,000 $15.00 $1,500,000.00 88 Softscape - stones, trees, landscape
Note Excl. 89 Ram statues and other artwork excluded
LS 1$200,000.00 $200,000.00 90 North side ramp construction
LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 91 South West side loading dock construction
Site Development Total $6.92/SF $5,350,000.00
G3010 Water Supply
Note Excl. 55 Note for all Utilities - it is assumed that the
stadium construction does not necessitate
re-routing existing utilities in Pitkin Street
LF 400 $75.00 $30,000.00 56 8" Domestic water line
LF 2,100 $75.00 $157,500.00 57 8" Fire loop
EA 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 58 Connection to existing service
LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 59 Valves, etc.
EA 5 $3,500.00 $17,500.00 60 Hydrant
LF 2,500 $20.00 $50,000.00 61 Patch road surface
LF 1,300 $100.00 $130,000.00 82 Relocate existing 12" irrigation line
Water Supply Total $0.52/SF $401,000.00
G3020 Sanitary Water
LF 500 $100.00 $50,000.00 62 Relocate exiting 10" Sanitary sewer line
LF 3,200 $150.00 $480,000.00 63 15" Sanitary sewer line (10' deep)
EA 15 $4,000.00 $60,000.00 65 Manhole
Sanitary Water Total $0.87/SF $674,500.00
G3030 Storm Sewer
LF 1,400 $225.00 $315,000.00 67 36" Storm sewer line
LF 1,700 $300.00 $510,000.00 68 48" Storm sewer line
EA 10 $5,000.00 $50,000.00 74 Manhole
LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 70 Storm inlets and laterals
LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 72 Allowance for water filtration (no detention
structures)
LF 900 $20.00 $18,000.00 73 Remove abandoned 36" Storm line
Storm Sewer Total $1.30/SF $1,008,500.00
DEN9340-1
Page 15 of 16
August 9, 2012
121
Constructon Estmate
Total Cost
CSU NEW STADIUM
Feasibility Study
GFA: 773,637.00 SF
Unit Qty Rate
G3040 Heating Distribution
LF 700 $275.00 $192,500.00 75 12" Steam line
LF 700 $20.00 $14,000.00 77 Patch road service
Heating Distribution Total $0.28/SF $213,700.00
G3050 Cooling Distribution
LF 600 $325.00 $195,000.00 78 16" Chilled water line
LF 600 $20.00 $12,000.00 80 Patch road service
Cooling Distribution Total $0.28/SF $216,600.00
G3060 Fuel Distribution
LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 81 Allow for trench and conduit for incoming gas line
(service by utility)
Fuel Distribution Total $0.01/SF $10,000.00
G4010 Electrical Distribution
Note Excl. 83 Allowance to relocate existing electric service
lines by Utility
EA 4$199,650.00 $798,600.00 143 Pad mounted transformer
EA 4 $72,990.00 $291,960.00 144 Switch 15kV
Item $175,000.00 145 Site power feed including concrete duct bank,
conduit, conductors, trench & backfill, etc
Electrical Distribution Total $1.64/SF $1,265,560.00
G4020 Site Lighting
Item $50,000.00 290 Site lighting
Site Lighting Total $0.06/SF $50,000.00
G4030 Site Communications & Security
Note Excl. 84 Allowance to relocate existing fiber line, data and
communication lines by Utility
Item $40,000.00 293 Site communications
Site Communications & Security Total $0.05/SF $40,000.00
Total Cost $154,588,496.00
DEN9340-1
Page 16 of 16
CSU Football Stadium-Feasibility Study
Items Removed from RLB Estimate
RLB Concept Estimate 207,185,000 $
Concept Program = 773,637 sf
RLB Estimate of $196,500,000 + construction contigency and
escalation
Systems & Equipment
Scoreboard 3,600,000 $ carried in Item #760 Scoreboard in ICON Master Budget
TV Sets 2,100,000 $ carried in Item #761 Technical Systems in ICON Master Budget
Video Production 1,300,000 $ carried in Item #761 Technical Systems in ICON Master Budget
Broadcast Cable 1,250,000 $ carried in Item #761 Technical Systems in ICON Master Budget
Distributed TV System 750,000 $ carried in Item #761 Technical Systems in ICON Master Budget
Subtotal 9,000,000 $
Utilities
Reroute Irrigation Line 130,000 $
Sanitary Sewer Line 400,000 $ need to have RLB keep onsite sewer-Est total $480K
Patch Rd-SS line install 74,000 $
36" Storm Swr Line 275,000 $ need to have RLB keep onsite storm sewer-Est total $315k
48" Storm Swr Line 450,000 $ need to have RLB keep onsite storm sewer-Est total $510k
Patch Rd Surface 62,000 $
12" Steam Line 150,000 $ need to have RLB keep onsite steam-Est total $192.5k
Patch Rd-steam line 14,000 $
16" Chilled Wtr Line 155,000 $ need to have RLB keep onsite chilled wtr-Est total $195k
Patch Rd-chilled wtr 12,000 $
Subtotal 1,722,000 $
Total Items Removed 10,722,000 $
RLB Total Minus Items Removed 196,463,000 $
253.95 $ /sf (773,637 sf stadium program)
Budget for 640,000 sf Stadium 160,000,000 $ based on unit rate of $250/sf
August 9, 2012
122
DRAFT
8/9/2012
BUDGET ITEM
Baseline Budget New
Stadium Offsite Utilities Budget
Street & Intersection
Improvements Relocate Perc Buildings
Budget Alumni Center
(26,000sf)
Budget Parking
Garage(1,500 spaces) Comprehensive Budget Totals
Acct #
100. START-UP EXPENSES
110 Project Feasibility Analysis 300,000 300,000
115 EIR / CEQA Approval -
120 Property Assessment / Valuation -
125 Property Tax Assessment -
130 Project Financial Advisor -
135 Public Relations -
140 Political Consulting / Lobbying -
145 Food Service / Concessions Deal Consultant -
150 Research and Polling -
155 Campaign Costs -
190 Other Predevelopment Expenditures -
SUBTOTAL~ START-UP EXPENSES 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $
200. SALES & MARKETING
210 Naming Rights Expenses (not incl. commissions) - -
215 Global Partnerships - Premium Seating - -
220 Premium Seating Consulting - -
225 Global Partnerships - Sponsorship - -
230 Sponsorship Marketing Expenses (not incl. commissions) - -
240 Premium Seating Marketing Expenses (not incl. commissions) - -
245 Marketing Center / Mock Suite 125,000 125,000
250 Preopening and Grand Opening Expenses 250,000 250,000
260 Other Marketing Expenses -
SUBTOTAL~ SALES & MARKETING 375,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 375,000 $
300. LAND ACQUISITION & SITE DEVELOPMENT
310 Land Acquisition Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
320 Title, Fees, Interest, Misc Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
330 Property Taxes, Land carrying costs -
340 Condemnation Contingency Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
345 Business Displacement Costs Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
350 Hazardous Material Remediation Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
355 Health & Safety Plan -
360 Environmental Monitoring-Phase 1 75,000 50,000 - 25,000 25,000 - 175,000
375 Street Closures 250,000 250,000 150,000 650,000
380 Other Site Development Costs -
390 Public Art-1% 1,600,000 1,600,000
SUBTOTAL~ LAND ACQUISITION & SITE DEVELOPMENT 1,925,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 2,425,000 $
400. DESIGN/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
405 Basic Design & Engineering Services 12,400,000 Incl'd in Stadium 123,500 180,000 806,629 875,000 14,385,129
410 Additional Services - Architecture 1,240,000 Incl'd in Stadium 12,350 18,000 80,663 87,500 1,438,513
415 Reimburseables - Architecture 650,000 Incl'd in Stadium 15,000 15,000 75,000 25,000 780,000
416 ADA Consultant Incl. with 405 -
420 Additional Services (Structural) Incl. with 405 -
425 Additional Services (Mech/Elec/Plumb) Incl. with 405 -
426 Additional Services (Civil) Incl. with 405 -
430 Additional Services (A/V & Broadcast Systems) Incl. with 405 Not Applicable -
435 Site Surveying (Boundary & Topographic) 100,000 25,000 35,000 25,000 185,000
440 Traffic and Parking Studies Incl. with 405 - 25,000 50,000 75,000
445 Landscape Design Incl. with 405 -
450 Graphics Design (Directional) Incl. with 405 -
455 Foodservice Design Incl. with 405 Not Applicable -
460 Environmental Testing & Inspections (Phase 1) Incl. with 360 50,000 50,000 50,000 150,000
465 Environmental Testing - Highway Marquee -
470 Geotechnical Report/Ground Water Analysis 125,000 25,000 25,000 175,000
475 Experiential & Graphic Design - Theming -
480 Seismic Study Incl. with 490 -
485 Surrounding Building Testing & Inspections Incl. with 490 -
490 Other Design Related Consultants Incl. with 405 -
495 LEED Related Consultants Incl. with 405 -
SUBTOTAL~ DESIGN/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,515,000 $ - $ 150,850 $ 288,000 $ 1,097,292 $ 1,137,500 $ 17,188,642 $
500. LEGAL & GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
510 Legal Services (Transaction & Administrative) 250,000 250,000
520 Legal Services (Insurance / Risk Mgmt) Not Applicable -
530 Legal Services (Design / Construction Related) Not Applicable -
540 City Facilitator Services (Zoning & Permits) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
550 MBE/WBE Facilitator (diversity coordinator) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable -
590 Other -
SUBTOTAL~ LEGAL & GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $
600. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
605 Developer Management & Administration Expenses -
610 Developer Staff Reimburseables -
611 Board Expenses -
620 Program Manager Services 5,079,425 341,550 51,841 113,650 368,796 678,563 6,633,825
621 Program Manager Reimbursables 203,177 13,662 2,074 4,546 14,752 27,143 265,353
630 City Program Management -
635 Project Office Expense-assume CSU provided space 250,000 250,000
640 Office Build-out Expense 20,000 20,000
CSU - Football StadiumFeasibilty Study
Comprehensive Budget Summary
$160M StadiumConstruction Costs
August 9, 2012
123
DRAFT
8/9/2012
BUDGET ITEM
Baseline Budget New
Stadium Offsite Utilities Budget
Street & Intersection
Improvements Relocate Perc Buildings
Budget Alumni Center
(26,000sf)
Budget Parking
Garage(1,500 spaces) Comprehensive Budget Totals
Acct #
CSU - Football StadiumFeasibilty Study
Comprehensive Budget Summary
$160M StadiumConstruction Costs
645 Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (Project Admin related) 25,000 25,000
650 Rent Expense Incl. with 635 -
655 Operating Expenses Incl. with 635 -
660 Equipment/Computer Maintenance Incl. with 645 -
690 Other Administrative Expenses -
695 Printing/Reproduction Expenses 85,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 2,500 102,500
SUBTOTAL~ PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 5,662,602 $ 360,212 $ 58,915 $ 118,196 $ 388,548 $ 708,205 $ 7,296,678 $
700. CONSTRUCTION
701 Preconstruction Services Fees 592,000 39,794 92,500 724,294
703 Stadium - CMFee Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
710 Hard Construction Cost 160,000,000 13,500,000 1,900,000 4,000,000 10,755,050 25,000,000 215,155,050
711 CMGeneral Conditions Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
712 CMDesign Contingency Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
713 CMConstruction Contingency Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
714 CMSchedule Contingency / OT Premium -
730 Off-site Infrastructure Improvements -
SUBTOTAL~ CONSTRUCTION 160,592,000 $ 13,500,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 10,794,844 $ 25,092,500 $ 215,879,344 $
750. SYSTEMS & EQUIPMENT
751 FFE Package-Equipment 2,200,000 100,000 1,000,000 3,300,000
755 Concession Build-out (equipment only) 4,500,000 4,500,000
756 Concession Personal Equipment, Servicewares & Smallwares Incl. with 755 -
760 Scoreboard & Video Systems (Main and Ribbon Boards) 5,400,000 5,400,000
761 Technical Systems - Low Voltage 6,500,000 6,500,000
762 Audio Incl. with 761 -
763 Video Production Incl. with 761 -
764 Broadcast Cable Incl. with 761 -
765 Distributed Television Incl. with 761 -
766 Security Incl. with 761 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
770 Stadium FFE-Operations 500,000 500,000
775 Telecommunication Systems Incl. with 761 -
780 Display Systems - Sponsorship 1,500,000 250,000 1,750,000
790 Highway Marquee Sign -
SUBTOTAL~ SYSTEMS & EQUIPMENT 20,600,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 1,250,000 $ - $ 21,950,000 $
800. PERMITS, TESTING, FEES, and SPECIAL TAXES
801 Building Permit Fees/Approvals (1.2%) 1,920,000 162,000 22,800 48,000 129,061 300,000 2,581,861
821 Storm Drain Impact Fee 500,000 10,000 150,000 25,000 685,000
822 Sanitary Impact Fees (System Development Charges) 850,000 15,000 250,000 50,000 1,165,000
823 Health Department Fees 500,000 5,000 250,000 755,000
824 Street Closures and Traffic Mitigation Fees -
830 Owners Testing Fees 1,200,000 30,000 80,663 187,500 1,498,163
840 Utility & Other Fees (Tap Fees) 2,500,000 50,000 750,000 350,000 3,650,000
841 Utility Deposits -
842 Electrical Distribution Design/Improvements Incl. with 710 -
843 Natural Gas Distribution Design/Improvements Incl. with 710 -
844 Water/Wastewater Distribution Design/Improvements Incl. with 710 -
845 Telephone/Cable Tv Distribution Design/Improvements Incl. with 710 -
850 B&O Tax -
SUBTOTAL~ PERMITS, TESTING, FEES, and SPECIAL TAXES 7,470,000 $ 162,000 $ 22,800 $ 158,000 $ 1,609,723 $ 912,500 $ 10,335,023 $
900. INSURANCE, FINANCING & TRANSACTION COSTS
910 Construction Insurance - General Liability (1.2%) 2,174,304 162,000 22,800 49,200 144,538 301,110 2,853,952
911 Construction Insurance - Workers Compensation Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 Incl. with 710 -
912 Construction Insurance - Builders Risk (.75%) 1,358,940 101,250 14,250 30,750 90,336 188,194 1,783,720
913 Construction Insurance - Property (.475%) 860,662 64,125 9,025 19,475 57,213 119,189 1,129,689
920 Financing Costs / Cost of Issuance -
930 Bonds & Insurance (.65%) 1,177,748 87,750 12,350 26,650 78,291 163,101 1,545,891
935 Debt Service Reserve Fund -
940 Capitalized Interest -
941 Capitalized Relocation Expenses -
942 Capitalized Relocation Expenses (If Funding is Available) -
950 Capital Improvement Reserve Fund -
SUBTOTAL~ INSURANCE, FINANCING & TRANSACTION COSTS 5,571,654 $ 415,125 $ 58,425 $ 126,075 $ 370,379 $ 771,594 $ 7,313,252 $
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS - Subtotal before Contingency 217,261,256 $ 14,737,337 $ 2,340,990 $ 4,815,271 $ 15,535,786 $ 28,622,299 $ 283,312,939 $
1000. CONTINGENCY
1030 Owner General Project Contingency (5%) 10,863,063 736,867 117,049 240,764 776,789 1,431,115 14,165,647
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 228,124,319 $ 15,474,204 $ 2,458,039 $ 5,056,035 $ 16,312,575 $ 30,053,414 $ 297,478,586 $
August 9, 2012
124
Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Phase I 185 days Wed 3/21/12 Tue 12/4/12
2 Notice To Proceed 0 days Wed 3/21/12 Wed 3/21/12
3 Site Selection 50 days Thu 3/22/12 Wed 5/30/12
4 Initial Development of Stadium Program 15 days Thu 4/5/12 Wed 4/25/12
5 Conceptual Design 27 days Thu 4/5/12 Fri 5/11/12
6 Project Budget and Schedule 13 days Mon 5/14/12 Wed 5/30/12
7 Funding Strategies 51 days Wed 3/21/12 Wed 5/30/12
8 Market Analysis 36 days Wed 4/11/12 Wed 5/30/12
9 Stadium Advisory Committee 0 days Wed 5/30/12 Wed 5/30/12
10 Refine Program/Concept Design 45 days Wed 5/30/12 Tue 7/31/12
11 Marketing Plan Production and Revision 45 days Wed 5/30/12 Tue 7/31/12
12 Donor and Sponsor Solicitations 135 days Wed 5/30/12 Tue 12/4/12
13 Notice to Proceed with Phase II 0 days Wed 9/5/12 Wed 9/5/12
14 Phase II 776 days Wed 9/5/12 Wed 8/26/15
15 Design Phase 315 days Wed 9/5/12 Tue 11/19/13
16 Schematic Design Phase 65 days Wed 9/5/12 Tue 12/4/12
17 Schematic Design Cost Confirmation 20 days Wed 12/5/12 Tue 1/1/13
18 Design Development Phase 90 days Wed 1/2/13 Tue 5/7/13
19 Design Development Cost Confirmation 20 days Wed 5/8/13 Tue 6/4/13
20 Construction Documents Phase 120 days Wed 6/5/13 Tue 11/19/13
21 Early Bid Packages 70 days Wed 6/5/13 Tue 9/10/13
22 Pre-Construction 295 days Wed 10/3/12 Tue 11/19/13
23 Solicit CM/GC 30 days Wed 10/3/12 Tue 11/13/12
24 CM/GC Contract 15 days Wed 11/14/12 Tue 12/4/12
25 GMP Development 60 days Wed 8/28/13 Tue 11/19/13
26 GMP 0 days Tue 11/19/13 Tue 11/19/13
27 Construction 511 days Wed 9/11/13 Wed 8/26/15
28 Site Prep/Foundations/Underground Utilities 90 days Wed 9/11/13 Tue 1/14/14
29 Structure 145 days Wed 12/4/13 Tue 6/24/14
30 Building Enclosure 200 days Wed 4/9/14 Tue 1/13/15
31 Interior Construction/Finishes 240 days Thu 9/25/14 Wed 8/26/15
32 Substantial Completion / Certificate of Occupancy 0 days Wed 8/26/15 Wed 8/26/15
3/21
5/30
9/5
11/19
Substantial Completion / Certificate
F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
2 2013 2014 2015 2016
Task
Split
Progress
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Colorado State University - Football Stadium
Conceptual Schedule
Page 1
Project: CSU Proposed Schedule_5-3
Date: Fri 6/1/12

Feasibility Study On The CSU Stadium Project

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feasibility Study On The CSU Stadium Project

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feasibility Study On The CSU Stadium Project

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY

ON-CAMPUS STADIUM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Goal l i ne to20's 3,000 $200 85% $510,000 $600,000

You might also like