Concepts in Theoretical Physics

Lecture 5: Quantum Mechanics

David Tong

Slogans of Quantum Mechanics

Wave Particle Duality Discrete Quantum Energy Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle Schrodingers Cat Feynmans Sum over Histories

What is it Good For?

It is the way the universe works at the deepest level. Technological developments. Philosophical questions. New developments in pure mathematics.

Atomic Physics

Cold Physics
Quantum Mechanics is the way the universe works. But often its effects are washed out unless we look at very small scales Or very cold temperatures Much recent progress has been in understanding how quantum mechanics affects macroscopic numbers of atoms

Macroscopic Quantum Effects

Superconductivity (discovered 1911, understood 1957)
High Temperature Superconductivity
(discovered 1986, still to be understood)

Superfluidity

(discovered 1937, understood 1950s and 1960s)

Bose-Einstein Condensation

(understood 1925, discovered 1995)

Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates

Quantized rotation: number of vortices = spin

Dividing the Indivisible

Electrons are elementary particles. They have no constituent parts Yet we frequently perform experiments where they split up! This is an article from 2 weeks ago

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Mechanics is a framework rather than a theory

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

For example, suppose youre given Coulombs law, describing how electric charges experience a force

F =

Q1 Q2 4r2

You can either choose to think in the classical framework, which means that we plug this into F=ma. Or you could choose to think in the quantum framework, which means that you plug this into Schrodingers equation. Its like running a programme on different operating systems...and the operating system of the universe is quantum mechanics

Classical Orbit of an Electron

Consider the electron orbiting the proton. The classical problem (i.e. F=ma) is exactly the same as a planet orbiting the sun. The orbits are ellipses, with the sun (or proton) at one focus.

But theres no restriction on the size or eccentricity of the orbit.that depends only on initial conditions of the problem
The question of the distances between the planets used to be the biggest open problem in science. But we now know that its a complicated question that isnt answered by the fundamental theory.

Quantum Orbits of an Electron

In quantum mechanics the answer is very different The electron can only sit in very particular orbits. Yet, in each of these orbits, its position is undetermined. It is smeared out, a wave of probability.

The Mathematical Framework

The mathematical framework of quantum mechanics was covered in Vectors and Matrices, with more in next years Linear Algebra. However, this may not be apparent when taking your first Quantum Mechanics course next year, where Differential Equations will appear more important.

The Principle of Superposition

The state of a system consists of all the information thats required to determine the state of the system at all times in the future In Classical Mechanics, the state of a system is by given the positions and momenta of all the particles.

The Principle of Superposition

In quantum mechanics, the state lives in a vector space. This means that we are allowed to add and subtract statessomething which makes no sense in classical mechanics.

The vector is called the wavefunction. It is typically a vector in an infinite dimensional vector space, known as a Hilbert space.

Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

While the state of the system is a vector, the measurements that we do on a system are matrices. We have a different matrix for each type of measurement: e.g. position, momentum, energy The possible outcomes of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the matrix.

H = E
matrix eigenvalue

For example: if H is the matrix representing a measurement of energy, then the eigenvalues E are the possible outcomes of that measurement When H is energy, this is known as the Schrodinger Equation.

Probability
What happens if our state is not an eigenvector of the matrix we are measuring? Then the measurement could give any one of the eigenvalues Ei . Each occurs with some probability We expand our state in a basis of eigenvectors of H.

=
actual state

i ci i

eigenvectors

Then the probability of the measurement giving Ei is

P rob(Ei ) =

|c i |2 2 j | cj |

The Necessity of Uncertainty

Most matrices have different eigenvectors. This means that if the state is in an eigenvector of one matrix, it is unlikely to be in an eigenvector of a different matrix. So if one type of measurement is certain, another type becomes uncertain. This is Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. If we know, say, the position of the particle then its momentum becomes uncertain. And vice versa.

Entanglement

To end, lets look at one of the more bewildering aspects of quantum mechanics. It is the fact that strange correlations can exist between experiments. This subject is usually called entanglement.

Entanglement
This subject has a venerable history
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, 1935, tried to use it to disprove quantum mechanics. The argument was roughly: entanglement is so ridiculous that it cant possibly be right. Bell, 1964 showed that one could test through experiment whether entanglement actually occurs. Aspect et. al. 1982 did the experiment.

Punchline: the universe is a much stranger place than you imagined!

Ill tell you about a result from 1990 by Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger, * known as GHZ correlations.

* Via Mermin and Coleman

An Experiment
Three scientists are each sitting in a lab, separated in spacetime.

Every minute, they receive a package sent from a mysterious central station. They are told what they have to do

An Experiment

Chose the setting for switch Place the sample in the machine Press the button, and record whether the result is +1 or -1

An Experiment

Chose the setting for switch Place the sample in the machine Press the button, and record whether the result is +1 or -1

An Experiment

+1
Y
Chose the setting for switch Place the sample in the machine Press the button, and record whether the result is +1 or -1

An Experiment

-1
Y
Chose the setting for switch Place the sample in the machine Press the button, and record whether the result is +1 or -1

An Experiment
The scientists are not told whats in the packages
They could be blood samples, with the machine testing for high/low glucose when the switch is on X, and high/low cholesterol when the switch is on Y. They could be elementary particles Or the whole thing could just be a hoax with the machine flashing up +1/-1 at random

Each measurement is recorded until each scientist has a list that looks like this but with a bazillion entries

X X Y X Y Y X Y Y Y Y X X Y X
+1 -1 +1 +1 -1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1

Looking for Correlations

Now the scientists get together and start looking for correlations in the measurements. They notice the following. Whenever one person measured X, and other two measured Y, the results always multiply to +1

X1 Y2 Y3 = Y1 X2 Y3 = Y1 Y2 X3 = +1

This means the first person measured X, while the second and third people measured Y

Looking for Correlations

Maybe this occurred because all three got the result +1; or perhaps one got +1 and the other two got -1. There are 8 ways that this could have happened X1 = + X2 = + X3 = + X1 = X2 = + X3 = Y1 = + Y2 = + Y3 = + Y1 = Y2 = + Y3 = X1 = Y 1 = X2 = Y 2 = X3 = + Y 3 = + X1 = X2 = + X3 = Y1 = + Y2 = Y3 = X1 = Y 1 = + X2 = Y 2 = + X3 = + Y 3 =

X1 = + X2 = X3 =

X =+ Y = 1 1 Y1 = + X2 = + Y2 = Y2 = X3 = + Y3 = Y3 = + X1 = + Y 1 = X2 = Y 2 = + X3 = Y 3 = +

The Prediction
But this gives a prediction.whenever all three scientists measured X, the results multiplied together must give +1

(X1 Y2 Y3 )(Y1 X2 Y3 )(Y1 Y2 X3 ) = = =

X1 X2 X3 (Y1 Y2 Y3 )2 X1 X2 X3 +1

This is so simple, it couldnt even be called a law of physics. It follows from our most basic ideas about how the universe works.

The Astonishing Truth!

This experiment has been done. * The things measured were the polarization of photons. (Spins of elementary particles would work just as well). The results are

X1 Y2 Y3 = Y1 X2 Y3 = Y1 Y2 X3 = +1 X1 X2 X3 = 1
The very basic (classical) intuition for how the universe works is wrong! * Pan et. al. Nature 2000, Feb 3;403(6769): 515-519

Violations of Locality?
An implicit assumption is that the measurements are performed independently, so that experiment 2 has no way of knowing whether the switch on experiment 1 is set to X or Y. But we can guarantee that this is true, by placing the scientists at space-like separated points.

x Central Station

It appears that these correlations require information to be transmitted faster than light!

The Quantum Resolution

The resolution to the paradox is that we assumed the packages leaving the central station had definite assignments, e.g. X1 = Y 1 = + X2 = + Y 2 = X3 = Y 3 = + But in the quantum world, we cannot give definite assignments to all possible measurements. The package that arrived didnt have both X and Y assigned at the same time. The GHZ correlations are almost nonlocal. In a classical world, the only way you could get such correlations is by non-locality, which implies transmission of information faster than the speed of light. But our world is quantum. And such correlations are allowed without faster-than-light communication.

What were they measuring?

They were measuring spins of particles. The measurement matrices are

X=

0 1

1 0

Y =

0 i i 0

You can check that these have eigenvalues +1 and -1, corresponding to the measurements
But X and Y do not have the same eigenvectors

The state that the central station was sending is neither an eigenvector of X nor Y. It is = 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1

What were they measuring?

The state that the central station was sending is neither an eigenvector of X nor Y. It is = 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1

This is an eigenvector of XYY and YXY and YYX. And, importantly, it is an eigenvector of XXX. Exercise: Check that this gives rise to the observed correlations.