Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 57 views

    Cai - Emg Study

    Uploaded by

    api-248381980
    - The study analyzed EMG data of lower extremity muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with chronic ankle instability (FAI), copers, and healthy controls. - EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and gluteus medius muscles was measured during the anterior, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial reaches of the Y-balance test. - For the anterior reach, there were no statistically significant differences in EMG activity between groups for any of the muscles. For the posterior-lateral reach, only gluteus medius EMG showed a significant difference between groups.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Cai - Emg Study

    Uploaded by

    api-248381980
    57 views21 pages
    - The study analyzed EMG data of lower extremity muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with chronic ankle instability (FAI), copers, and healthy controls. - EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and gluteus medius muscles was measured during the anterior, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial reaches of the Y-balance test. - For the anterior reach, there were no statistically significant differences in EMG activity between groups for any of the muscles. For the posterior-lateral reach, only gluteus medius EMG showed a significant difference between groups.

    Original Title

    cai - emg study

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    - The study analyzed EMG data of lower extremity muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with chronic ankle instability (FAI), copers, and healthy controls. - EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and gluteus medius muscles was measured during the anterior, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial reaches of the Y-balance test. - For the anterior reach, there were no statistically significant differences in EMG activity between groups for any of the muscles. For the posterior-lateral reach, only gluteus medius EMG showed a significant difference between groups.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    57 views21 pages

    Cai - Emg Study

    Uploaded by

    api-248381980
    - The study analyzed EMG data of lower extremity muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with chronic ankle instability (FAI), copers, and healthy controls. - EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and gluteus medius muscles was measured during the anterior, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial reaches of the Y-balance test. - For the anterior reach, there were no statistically significant differences in EMG activity between groups for any of the muscles. For the posterior-lateral reach, only gluteus medius EMG showed a significant difference between groups.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 21

    Electromyographical Analysis of Selected Lower

    Extremity Muscles During the Star Excursion Balance


    Test in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
    Takeshi Kitamura, WSU MSAT

    EMG Analysis
    One-way ANOVA + Post-hoc tests
    Independent variables:
    Grouped subjects by FAI, Coper, and Control

    Dependent variables:
    Ave. Mean % of EMG (Peroneus Longus, Tibialis Anterior,
    Gluteus Medius) during Y-Balance test (Anterior, Posterior-

    Lateral, and Posterior Medial directions)

    EMG results
    FAI

    12

    Av. Mean %
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22

    Per Longus
    29.8
    26.8
    26.3
    32.9
    32.9
    34.4
    31.4
    33.3
    31
    42.8
    36.5
    38
    38.5
    25.2
    46
    29.9
    25.1
    25.2
    41.4
    40.8
    33.4
    39.9

    Coper
    ANT
    Tib Ant
    34.6
    34.2
    26.9
    33.4
    37.6
    34.9
    36.5
    45.4
    37.3
    31.7
    31.1
    37.8
    46.2
    28.7
    30.4
    36.4
    39.6
    40.4
    42.1
    29.2
    34.5
    36

    Glute Med
    27.2
    22.1
    26.1
    30.7
    30.2
    22.2
    29.4
    27.9
    34.5
    26.7
    23.1
    23.8
    30.1
    26.6
    27.7
    34.3
    31.8
    26.1
    36.8
    22.9
    31.9
    19.3

    Control

    Per Longus
    30.1
    29
    25.2
    36.3
    40.3
    150
    35.3
    33.2
    37.6
    55.4
    39.5
    44
    46
    30.5
    51.3
    30.6
    27.6
    37.3
    67
    50.4
    41.3
    40.9

    4
    PL
    Tib Ant
    38.1
    38
    28.6
    36.3
    44.9
    35.6
    47.7
    38.9
    48.3
    43.5
    32.4
    37.6
    46.9
    32.8
    35.8
    44.3
    44.6
    47.7
    40.1
    32.4
    37.2
    44.1

    Glute Med
    32.1
    20.6
    28.6
    28.3
    32.7
    27.6
    38.6
    35
    38.8
    35.1
    28.1
    29.9
    40.9
    45.2
    38.8
    47.3
    41.1
    43.6
    44.3
    26.5
    37.2
    23.1

    Per Longus
    26.3
    27.9
    25
    32.7
    38.4
    81.3
    33
    35.2
    36.6
    34.8
    34.2
    46.2
    38.5
    27.7
    48.1
    31.9
    27
    33
    45.6
    49
    35.7
    41.7

    PM
    Tib Ant
    36
    38.7
    33
    32.6
    43.2
    39.5
    42.2
    42.4
    44.2
    36.5
    36.1
    37.9
    46.9
    33.3
    34
    44.8
    39.2
    45.2
    40.4
    32.2
    32.5
    44.1

    Glute Med
    27.2
    21.1
    25.1
    28.1
    28.3
    25.3
    32.7
    31.1
    32.3
    25
    24.1
    25
    35.1
    28.4
    29.6
    34.3
    40.1
    29.7
    31.3
    28.7
    31.8
    25.4

    Noraxon Report

    Noraxon Report
    Patient

    Patient

    Record

    Project
    First Name
    Last Name
    Sex

    T TEST
    Justin
    Valdez
    Male

    Name
    Date Measured
    Number of periods

    Mean, %

    Channel Curves

    Av. Mean, %

    Mean
    Frequency, Hz

    100

    50

    50

    24.7

    31

    55.6

    T2
    11/7/2013 11:05 AM
    3

    Mean, %

    Av. Mean, %

    Mean
    Frequency, Hz

    23.2

    40.8

    54

    22.3

    29.2

    80.8

    13.1

    22.9

    33.2

    LT TIB.ANT., %

    RT TIB.ANT., %
    100

    100

    50

    50

    16.6

    37.3

    69.1

    0
    LT GLUT. MED., %

    RT GLUT. MED., %
    100

    100

    50

    50

    s0

    Name
    Date Measured
    Number of periods

    Channel Curves

    100

    Parameter
    Mean, %
    Av. Mean, %
    Mean Frequency, Hz

    T TEST
    Desirae
    Cruse
    Male

    LT PERONEUS, %

    RT PERONEUS, %

    0
    Periods 1 Begin
    Markers

    Record

    EMG samples
    Project
    First Name
    Last Name
    Sex

    Y-balance EMG
    10/17/2013 11:35 AM
    3

    29.5
    2 Begin 5.1
    1 Marker 5.0
    5

    3 Begin 10.4
    2 Marker 10.2
    10

    RT PERONEUS, %
    24.74.06
    312.57
    55.64.82

    34.5

    31.6

    3 ...

    0
    Periods 1 Begin
    Markers
    s0

    15

    RT TIB.ANT.

    RT GLUT. MED.
    16.63.33
    37.32.09
    69.13.08

    FAI (ANT)

    29.52.08
    34.50.699
    31.61.92

    Parameter
    Mean, %
    Av. Mean, %
    Mean Frequency, Hz

    2 Begin 5.1

    3 Begin 9.0

    10

    LT PERONEUS, %

    LT TIB.ANT.
    23.27.32
    40.82.32
    540.429

    Coper (ANT)

    LT GLUT. MED.
    22.35.67
    29.23.37
    80.811.3

    13.11.38
    22.90.562
    33.21.76

    EMG: Anterior Reach


    Descriptives
    N

    Mean

    Std. Deviation

    Std. Error

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean


    Lower Bound

    FAI
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Upper Bound

    12

    34.6250

    7.23491

    2.08854

    30.0282

    39.2218

    25.10

    46.00

    Coper

    33.0000

    4.72398

    1.92856

    28.0425

    37.9575

    26.80

    40.80

    Control

    32.0000

    5.30911

    2.65456

    23.5520

    40.4480

    25.20

    38.00

    Total

    22

    33.7045

    6.15935

    1.31318

    30.9736

    36.4354

    25.10

    46.00

    FAI

    12

    36.3083

    5.50627

    1.58952

    32.8098

    39.8069

    26.90

    46.20

    Coper

    35.2833

    5.37937

    2.19612

    29.6380

    40.9286

    29.20

    45.40

    Control

    34.3750

    4.01943

    2.00972

    27.9792

    40.7708

    28.70

    37.80

    Total

    22

    35.6773

    5.06697

    1.08028

    33.4307

    37.9238

    26.90

    46.20

    FAI

    12

    28.8917

    5.06529

    1.46222

    25.6733

    32.1100

    19.30

    36.80

    Coper

    25.5000

    3.60278

    1.47083

    21.7191

    29.2809

    22.10

    30.70

    Control

    27.9250

    3.49988

    1.74994

    22.3559

    33.4941

    23.80

    31.90

    22

    27.7909

    4.52495

    .96472

    25.7847

    29.7972

    19.30

    36.80

    Total

    EMG: Anterior Reach


    Tests of Normality
    Group

    Kolmogorov-Smirnov
    Statistic

    FAI
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    Shapiro-Wilk

    Sig.
    12

    Statistic

    df

    Sig.

    .200

    .937

    12

    .460

    .956

    .788

    Coper

    .217

    .200

    Control

    .205

    .986

    .935

    .979

    12

    .979

    FAI

    .144

    12

    .200

    Coper

    .362

    .014

    .817

    .083

    Control

    .262

    .895

    .407

    12

    .200

    .976

    12

    .962

    .869

    .222

    .990

    .959

    FAI
    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    .125

    df

    .124

    Coper

    .265

    .200

    Control

    .163

    *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.


    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

    **EMG data is normally distributed for FAI, Coper, Control (p > .05)

    EMG: Anterior Reach

    Peroneus Longus

    Tibialis Anterior
    *1 outlier & extreme outlier (Coper)
    due to measurement error

    Gluteus Medius

    EMG: Anterior Reach

    EMG: Anterior Reach


    ANOVA
    Sum of Squares
    Between Groups
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    12.384

    Within Groups

    771.923

    19

    40.628

    Total

    796.690

    21

    12.494

    6.247

    Within Groups

    526.665

    19

    27.719

    Total

    539.159

    21

    46.102

    23.051

    Within Groups

    383.877

    19

    20.204

    Total

    429.978

    21

    Between Groups
    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    Mean Square

    24.767

    Between Groups
    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    df

    Sig.
    .305

    .741

    .225

    .800

    1.141

    .340

    **No statistically significant differences in EMG between groups

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach


    Tests of Normality
    Group

    Kolmogorov-Smirnov
    Statistic

    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    Shapiro-Wilk

    Sig.

    Statistic

    df

    Sig.

    .950

    12

    .637

    FAI

    .189

    12

    .200

    Coper

    .371

    .010

    .628

    .001

    Control

    .220

    .958

    .766

    FAI

    .275

    12

    .013

    .858

    12

    .046

    .897

    .357

    Coper

    .229

    .200

    Control

    .327

    .891

    .388

    12

    .200

    .952

    12

    .665

    .970

    .891

    .978

    .889

    FAI
    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    df

    .186

    Coper

    .188

    .200

    Control

    .217

    *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.


    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

    ***EMG (PL) for Coper & EMG (TA) for FAI are NOT normally distributed (p < .05)

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach

    Peroneus Longus
    *1 extreme outlier (Coper)
    due to measurement error

    Tibialis Anterior

    Gluteus Medius

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach


    ANOVA
    Sum of Squares
    Between Groups
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    df

    Mean Square

    925.408

    462.704

    Within Groups

    12853.230

    19

    676.486

    Total

    13778.638

    21

    Between Groups

    113.589

    56.795

    Within Groups

    583.849

    19

    30.729

    Total

    697.438

    21

    Between Groups

    334.871

    167.435

    Within Groups

    846.789

    19

    44.568

    1181.660

    21

    Total

    Sig.
    .684

    .517

    1.848

    .185

    3.757

    .042

    ***Statistically significant difference in Gluteus Medius EMG between groups


    F(2,19) = 3.757, p < .05

    EMG: Posterior-Lateral Reach


    Multiple Comparisons
    Tukey HSD
    Dependent Variable

    (I) Group

    (J) Group

    Mean Difference

    Std. Error

    Sig.

    (I-J)
    FAI

    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    Coper

    Control

    FAI

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    Coper

    Control

    FAI

    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    Coper

    Control

    Coper

    95% Confidence Interval


    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    -13.27500

    13.00467

    .573

    -46.3127

    19.7627

    3.78333

    15.01650

    .966

    -34.3653

    41.9320

    FAI

    13.27500

    13.00467

    .573

    -19.7627

    46.3127

    Control

    17.05833

    16.78896

    .576

    -25.5932

    59.7098

    Control

    FAI

    -3.78333

    15.01650

    .966

    -41.9320

    34.3653

    Coper

    -17.05833

    16.78896

    .576

    -59.7098

    25.5932

    Coper

    5.21667

    2.77168

    .171

    -1.8247

    12.2580

    Control

    2.94167

    3.20046

    .635

    -5.1890

    11.0723

    FAI

    -5.21667

    2.77168

    .171

    -12.2580

    1.8247

    Control

    -2.27500

    3.57823

    .802

    -11.3653

    6.8153

    FAI

    -2.94167

    3.20046

    .635

    -11.0723

    5.1890

    Coper

    2.27500

    3.57823

    .802

    -6.8153

    11.3653

    Coper

    8.51667

    3.33796

    .049

    .0368

    16.9966

    -.85833

    8.9334

    Control

    3.85434

    .973

    -10.6501

    FAI

    -8.51667

    3.33796

    .049

    -16.9966

    -.0368

    Control

    -9.37500

    4.30929

    .101

    -20.3225

    1.5725

    .85833

    3.85434

    .973

    -8.9334

    10.6501

    9.37500

    4.30929

    .101

    -1.5725

    20.3225

    FAI
    Coper

    *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

    EMG: Posterior-Medial Reach


    Descriptives
    N

    Mean

    Std. Deviation

    Std. Error

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean


    Lower Bound

    FAI
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Upper Bound

    12

    36.2333

    6.84415

    1.97574

    31.8848

    40.5819

    25.00

    48.10

    Coper

    42.0667

    20.83983

    8.50783

    20.1966

    63.9367

    26.30

    81.30

    Control

    35.6500

    7.77882

    3.88941

    23.2722

    48.0278

    27.70

    46.20

    Total

    22

    37.7182

    12.00260

    2.55896

    32.3965

    43.0398

    25.00

    81.30

    FAI

    12

    40.6333

    4.77519

    1.37848

    37.5993

    43.6673

    33.00

    46.90

    Coper

    36.9000

    4.04079

    1.64965

    32.6594

    41.1406

    32.20

    42.40

    Control

    36.4750

    4.49768

    2.24884

    29.3182

    43.6318

    32.50

    42.20

    Total

    22

    38.8591

    4.76442

    1.01578

    36.7467

    40.9715

    32.20

    46.90

    FAI

    12

    30.0250

    4.87668

    1.40778

    26.9265

    33.1235

    24.10

    40.10

    Coper

    26.9167

    3.42369

    1.39772

    23.3237

    30.5096

    21.10

    31.10

    Control

    29.4750

    3.51129

    1.75565

    23.8878

    35.0622

    25.00

    32.70

    22

    29.0773

    4.34587

    .92654

    27.1504

    31.0041

    21.10

    40.10

    Total

    EMG: Posterior-Medial Reach


    Tests of Normality
    Group

    Kolmogorov-Smirnov
    Statistic

    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    Shapiro-Wilk

    Sig.

    Statistic

    df

    Sig.

    .978

    12

    .974

    FAI

    .120

    12

    .200

    Coper

    .296

    .110

    .793

    .051

    Control

    .247

    .955

    .745

    FAI

    .205

    12

    .177

    .913

    12

    .235

    .934

    .613

    Coper

    .190

    .200

    Control

    .260

    .910

    .483

    12

    .200

    .936

    12

    .454

    .950

    .744

    .928

    .580

    FAI
    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    df

    .162

    Coper

    .200

    .200

    Control

    .246

    *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.


    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

    **EMG data is normally distributed for FAI, Coper, Control (p > .05)

    EMG: Posterior-Medial Reach

    Peroneus Longus
    *1 outlier (Coper)
    due to measurement error

    Tibialis Anterior

    Gluteus Medius

    EMG: Posterior-Medial Reach

    EMG: Posterior-Medial Reach


    ANOVA
    Sum of Squares
    Between Groups
    EMG (Peroneus Longus)

    78.511

    Within Groups

    2868.290

    19

    150.963

    Total

    3025.313

    21

    83.539

    41.770

    Within Groups

    393.154

    19

    20.692

    Total

    476.693

    21

    39.420

    19.710

    Within Groups

    357.198

    19

    18.800

    Total

    396.619

    21

    Between Groups
    EMG (Gluteus Medius)

    Mean Square

    157.023

    Between Groups
    EMG (Tibialis Anterior)

    df

    Sig.
    .520

    .603

    2.019

    .160

    1.048

    .370

    **NO statistically significant differences in EMG between groups

    EMG Analysis: Summary


    There is a statistically significant difference in Gluteus Medius
    EMG between FAI and Coper groups during Posterior-Lateral
    reach (ANOVA = 0.042, Post-hoc = 0.049, p=0.05)
    Limitations: small sample size (N = 22), measurement error

    (e.g. EMG electrode placement, manual muscle testing)

    You might also like