Re: Identity NAT vs. NAT Exempt: E Security, CCSI
Re: Identity NAT vs. NAT Exempt: E Security, CCSI
Static Identity Policy NAT: Also, if the interface ACL's allow the traffic, connections between 192.168.0.0 and 172.31.0.0 can use this translation in either direction. ciscoasa(config)# access-list NAT ex permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.31.0.0 255.255.255.0 ciscoasa(config)# static (inside,outside) 192.168.0.0 access-list NAT Think of the above as the following-static (inside,outside) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 if going to 172.31.0.0/24 NAT Exemption: Again, if ACL allows it, connections between 192.168.0.0 and 172.31.0.0 can use this translation in either direction. Actually it's not a translation, but a "non" translation. ciscoasa(config)# access-list NAT_EXEMPT extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.31.0.0 255.255.255.0 ciscoasa(config)# nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT_EXEMPT Think of the above as disable translaton of 192.168.0.0 to any interface if going to 172.31.0.0/24 ............................ a more relevant configuration might be-ciscoasa(config)# static (inside,dmz1) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0