3.2.4.7 Lab - Researching RFCs
3.2.4.7 Lab - Researching RFCs
O Objectives
Part 1: RF FC Editor Navig gate to the RF FC Editor. Searc ch for RFCs using u keyword ds. Find RFCs R by statu us. Searc ch for humoro ous RFCs.
R Required Resources R
Device with Internet ac ccess
2013 Cisco and d/or its affiliates. All rights reserve ed. This docume ent is Cisco Publiic.
Page 1 of 6
2013 Cisco and d/or its affiliates. All rights reserve ed. This docume ent is Cisco Publiic.
Page 2 of 6
L Lab - Researching RFCs b. In the e Finding and d Retrieving RFCs, etc. pane, these lin nks can help y you search fo or RFCs using g different metho ods. The Search for an RF FC and its meta-data m link k displays a lis st of RFCs aft fter inputting y your searc ch parameters s, such as num mber, author, title, or keyw word. The wor rd, pop, is used in the follo owing example.
ce Protocol Version 3 in the list. The e associated RFC number is RFC 1939 9. This Look for Post Offic i also an Inte ernet standard d, as indicate ed by the STD D number in th he Number c column. RFC is After an RFC is published and assigned a a nu umber, it cann not be change ed and the RF FC number is s never used again for a ne ewer RFC. Fo or example, in n the More In nfo column, R RFC 1939 has s made the pr revious RFC 1725 obsolete e. The inform mation in RFC 1725 has not t been modified, but it has s been replace ed with the information from m RFC 1939. . RFC 1939 has been upda ated by RFC 1957, RFC 2449, and RFC C 6186, as ind e full text of th dicated in the More Info co olumn. If you click any of th hese links, the he RFC displays. Refer r to the Status s column and d locate the Proposed Sta andard status s. They may b be technically sound, but re equire further testing and validation. Refer r to the Status s column and d locate the In nformational status. Inform mational RFC Cs can be any ything from technical t to humorous. For r example, RF FC 0035 (Net twork Meeting g) provides an n insight into the development of a network n proto ocol in the ear rly days of the e Internet.
2013 Cisco and d/or its affiliates. All rights reserve ed. This docume ent is Cisco Publiic.
Page 3 of 6
2013 Cisco and d/or its affiliates. All rights reserve ed. This docume ent is Cisco Publiic.
Page 4 of 6
The list of results provides p links to the full tex xt of the I-Ds a and other use eful informatio on. The Sour rce colum mn lists the Wo orking Group with IETF tha at is responsiible for the dr raft. As an exa ample, 6man is a Worki ing Group tha at submitted multiple m drafts s. To find out more informa ation about this Working Group, click IETF I HOME at a the top of th he results pag ge. c. After arriving at the e IETF Homepage, click WG W Charters iin the left colu umn, listed un nder Working Groups. The Active A IETF Working W Group ps page displa ays. The IETF F Working Gr roups (WG) p primary function is to develop IETF spec cifications and d guidelines. Many M of these e specifications and guidelines are intended to becom e a list of Active Working G me standards s or recommendations. By scrolling the p page, you see Groups in differe ent developm ment areas for technology related to netw working. The 6man Workin ng Group can n be found listed in the Interne et Area. This working w group is responsib ble for mainte enance and advancement of the IPv6 protocol p spec cifications and d addressing architecture. a
2013 Cisco and d/or its affiliates. All rights reserve ed. This docume ent is Cisco Publiic.
Page 5 of 6
Lab - Researching RFCs d. Click 6man to view the complete list of current proposals and other information for this Working Group. After the I-D has received significant community review and is considered useful, stable, and wellunderstood by the community, it should become a Proposed Standard. The full text of the Proposed Standard can be found by searching in the RFC-Editor. The Proposed Standard may become an Internet Standard after significant implementation and successful operational experience. Note: Only a few RFCs published by IETF will become Internet standards.
Reflection
1. Why are RFCs important for Internet standards and history?
2013 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public.
Page 6 of 6