Class Notes Prosocial Behavior: Why Do People Help?

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Class Notes

Chapter 11
Prosocial Behavior:
Why Do People Help?
AROUSAL/COST-REWARD
MODEL
• AWARENESS OF NEED
• BECOME AROUSED
• LABEL AROUSAL
• ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY
• COST-REWARD ANALYSIS
• TAKE ACTION
AWARENESS &
INTERPRETATION
• AMBIGUITY VS CLEAR EMERGENCY
WINDOW WASHER 30% UNCLEAR VS
100% CLEAR
• EFFECT OF OTHERS
SMOKE STUDY
75%ALONE; 13% GROUP
• SOCIAL COMPARISON
(DON’T OVERREACT
• EXPLANATIONS OF SMOKE & CRASHING
NOISE
BECOME AROUSED

• MORE AROUSED AND LIKELY TO


HELP A FRIEND THAN A STRANGER
• MORE AROUSED PERSONS HELPED
WHEN A STACK OF CHAIRS FELL
ON EXPERIMENTER
LABEL AROUSAL

• PLACEBO DRUG TO EXPLAIN


AROUSAL DECREASES HELPING
LABEL AROUSAL

250
TIME BEFORE HELPING

200
NONAROUSAL
150 PLACEBO

AROUSAL
100
PALACEBO

50

0
UNAMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS
EMERGENCY EMERGENCY
TYPES OF AROUSAL

• PERSONAL DISTRESS (EGOISM)


ALARM, HORROR, DISTRESS

• EMPATHIC CONCERN (ALTRUISM)


COMPASSION, SYMPATHY,
CONCERN FOR OTHER

• MOTIVATE DIFFERENT PATTERNS


OF HELPING
BATSON’S ELAINE STUDIES
100
90 EMPATHY
80
70 PERSONAL
Percent Helping

60 DISTRESS
50

40

30
20

10
0
EASY HARD
ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY
• DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY
• CAR TROUBLE,
• REPORTING THEFT
(50% ALONE; 25% WITH OTHERS)
• SEIZURE STUDY
SEIZURE STUDY
100 ONLY
90
PERCENT HELPING

+ONE
80
70 +FOUR

60
50
40
30
20
10
0
75sec 300sec
ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY

• DIFFUSION
– LESS DIFFUSION WITH FRIENDS
• EXPERTISE
– HOW TO TREAT SEIZURE
OTHERS MORE EXPERT
• MODELS
– STALLED CAR, CHARITY
ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY

• NORMS
• NEED (DROPPED BOOKS)
• REASON FOR NEED
– (INVALID VS DRUNK)
• RECIPROCITY
• DON’T MEDDLE
– (FRIEND VS ATTACK)
• PERSONAL COMMITMENT
– (20% vs 90% if asked to watch stuff)
COST-REWARD ANALYSIS

• BLOODY VICTIM
• WHEN LATE
• LESS GROUP DECREASE WITH
DANGER
– (STOPPING RAPE)
• DANGER INVOLVED
– MUSCLE BUILDER (50% VS 16%)
MUSCLE BUILDER
50
45
40
35
30 FRIENDLY
25 INSULTING
20 THREATENING
15
10
5
0
PERCENT CORRECTING INSTRUCTIONS
COSTS - BEING LATE
70

60
Percent Helping

50

40

30

20

10

0
EARLY ON TIME LATE
TAKE ACTION

• DIRECT OR INDIRECT HELP


OTHER FACTORS
• MOOD
• GUILT
• VICTIM CHARACTERISTICS
– LOOKS, SEX,
• TERRITORY
– AIRPORT 41%; SUBWAY 83% HELPED
FALL VICTIM
MOTIVES
• ALTRUISM- DESIRE TO IMPROVE
ANOTHER PERSON’S WELFARE
• EGOISM - HELPING MOTIVATED BY
SELF-INTEREST

• REWARDS & PUNISHMENTS FOR HELPING


OR NOT HELPING
• NEGATIVE STATE RELIEF MODEL
(PERSONAL DISTRESS)
• EMPATHIC JOY

You might also like