Chapter 11 1 Eu and Govt

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 299

EXERCISE AND CONTROL OF EXECUTIVE POWER IN THE EUROPEAN UNION CENTRAL ISSUES Who or what is the govern ent

t o! the E"ro#ean Union$ o The #rin%i#a& instit"tions are &iste' in Art( )* TEU( o o This chapter will consider the ro&e o! those instit"tions that e+er%ise e+e%"tive #ower namely, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union, an' the Co ission(

What are the !"n%tions o! the ain e+e%"tive instit"tions$ o In the EU context, it is i #ossi-&e to i'enti!. one instit"tion as the so&e e+e%"tive( o Whereas, traditionally, o!ernmental "#nctions were di!ided alon le islati!e, exec#ti!e, and $#dicial lines, an. o! the !"n%tions are share' -etween the EU instit"tions( o The E#ropean Union has replaced the doctrine o" the sepa%ration o" powers with the 'o%trine o! /instit"tiona& -a&an%e0&

What are the %ontro&s on the e+er%ise o! e+e%"tive #ower$ o Altho# h the E#ropean Union has 'een s#ccess"#l in shi"tin policyma(in away "rom national o!ernments 'y de!elopin so) called o!ernance str#ct#res, it is o!ten %riti%i1e' !or having neg&e%te' #o&iti%a& a%%o"nta-i&it.( o To who are the EU #o&i%. a2ers a%%o"nta-&e$ o Sho"&' nationa& #ar&ia ents have a greater ro&e to #&a. in ho&'ing nationa& inisters 3who a2e #o&i%. in the Co"n%i&4 to a%%o"nt$

The %ha#ter wi&& a&so e+a ine whether, and i" so 'y what standards, the E"ro#ean Union has 'e o%rati% &egiti a%.( o The EU instit"tions with e+e%"tive #owers are not 'ire%t&. e&e%te' -. the #eo#&e( o *oes that mean that those instit#tions are "n'e o%rati% an' that the entire E"ro#ean Union &a%2s &egiti a%.$ o +r are there a&ternative wa.s o! generating &egiti a%. that nee' to -e e+#&ore'$

INTRODUCTION This chapter introd#ces the E#ropean Union ,EU-, e+#&ains the ro&e an' !"n%tions o! those EU instit"tions that wie&' e+e%"tive #owers, and to"%hes "#on their 'i!!erent rationa&es ,.s"#ranationa&is 0 vers"s %intergovern enta&is 0-& It then re&ates the instit"tiona& 'is%"ssion to 2e. %on%e#ts within %onstit"tiona& &aw ,'e o%ra%., &egiti a%., a%%o"nta-i&it., an' trans#aren%.-& The chapter concl#des with a disc#ssion o" the U5 Par&ia ents ro&e in the E"ro#ean #o&i%. a2ing #ro%ess& We enco#ra e readers to st#dy the EU instit#tions critically, '#t with an open mind&

When !iewed "rom the nation states perspecti!e, the wa. in whi%h the EU e+er%ises #ower, and the #"r#oses "or which it does so, are easi&. an' o!ten 'is isse' as a"to%rati%, o-s%"re, "na%%o"nta-&e, an' o"t6o!6to"%h with the #o#"&ar wi&&( In li ht o" this perception, it is i #ortant to %onsi'er whether the EU ens"res that the genera& %onstit"tiona& an' a' inistrative &aw #rin%i#&es o! goo' govern ent, and the "#ndamental standards o" a%%essi-i&it., trans#aren%., an' reasone' an' rationa& 'e%ision6 a2ing, are, in "act, met&

UNDERSTANDIN7 THE TREAT8 STRUCTURE /e"ore oin any "#rther, an introd#ction to the &ega& !o"n'ations o! the E"ro#ean Union is nee'e'( The EU and its !orer"nners were %reate' -. treaties agree' -etween the e -er states ,see Chapter 01-& The Unite' 5ing'o :an"ar. );<*& 9oine' on )

In 'road terms, the treaties %an -e tho"ght o! as !a&&ing into three ain #hases(

The vario"s re!or s to the treaties have #erio'i%a&&. re="ire' Arti%&es to -e ren" -ere' and so e Arti%&es have ove' -etween treaties( When readin older material, it is there"ore necessary to 'ear in mind that an Article re"erred to 'y n#m'er may 'e di""erent "rom the Article o" that same n#m'er in the treaties now in "orce& In this 'oo(, we "se the treat. n" -ering intro'"%e' when the Lis-on Treat. %a e into !or%e on ) De%e -er >??;(

THE ORI7INS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 3);@A6A<4 Empower and at the same time constrain In Chapter 2, we loo(ed at the role o" o!ernment.the exec#ti!e3in the modern /ritish constit#tional system& There is, we saw, a two!o&' as#e%t to %onstit"tiona& #ro%esses an' instit"tions& Constit"tiona& &aw e #owers govern ents 'y #rovi'ing a !ra ewor2 !or #o&i%. a2ing and implementation, -"t it a&so see2s to %onstrain govern enta& #ower, ens"ring that e+e%"tive !"n%tions are %arrie' o"t in a%%or'an%e with the r"&e o! &aw an' in an a%%o"nta-&e wa.&

This tension 'etween empowerment and constraint is also a dominant theme in relation to the operation o" the E#ropean Union, with which this chapter is concerned& /#t 'e"ore we examine the exercise o" exec#ti!e power in the EU, we nee' to re in' o"rse&ves that the stor. o! the EU is a re ar2a-&e #o&iti%a& #ro9e%t, with h" -&e origins an' a -itio"s #&ans(

Temper the nationalist ethos, E#ropean Comm#nity, nations limit their so!erei nty and in "a!o#r o" collecti!e peace, economic inte ration and s#pranational o!ernance *inan4 The idea o" a #nited E#rope is a rec#rrin theme in the lon and o"ten !iolent history o" the continent& The 5oly Roman Emperors, Napoleon, 5itler, and others all so# ht, in sometimes horri"yin ways, to achie!e a continental #nity 'ased !ario#sly on princely alliances, ethnic cohesion, ideolo y, or raw power& E!er since the emer ence o" the modern state, philosophers and political thin(ers ha!e also i agine' a "nite' E"ro#e tri" #hing over narrow nationa& interests an' a&&egian%es( Today6s E#ropean Union ,EU- is #ni7#e amon these competin !isions&

Te #ering the nationa&ist ethos that ha' -e%o e the r"&ing #rin%i#&e o! E"ro#ean #o&iti%a& 'eve&o# ent, the co#ntries that "ormed the E"ro#ean Co "nities, the -asis o! the E"ro#ean Union, %hose to &i it 3-"t not e&i inate4 their own sovereignt., the hallmar( o" a modern nation)state, in !avo"r o! %o&&e%tive #ea%e, e%ono i% integration, an' s"#ranationa& governan%e(

War ca#sed h# e loss and there"ore, EU created to end con"lict and "oster social harmony and promote economic DinanB Their reasons "or doin so were rooted in the disastro#s decades o" the early twentieth cent#ry& The isera-&e &ega%. o! heroi% E"ro#ean nationa&is Ctwo wor&' wars, co#ntless millions dead, and economic r#inwas not lost on the people o" E#rope, who enerally s#pported economic and political inte ration a"ter World War II&

E#ro"ederalism was pop#lar& E#ropean politicians wanted a'o!e all to en' internationa& stri!e , !oster so%ia& har on., an' #ro ote e%ono i% we&&6-eing( The. so"ght to -"i&' a -etter wor&', !ree o! the hatre's an' riva&ries that ha' 'estro.e' their %o"ntries in re%ent .ears& 8or their eneration, E#ropean inte ration 'ecame s.non. o"s with #ea%e an' #ros#erit.(

Altho# h idea o" EU is no'le, '#t they willin to share their so!erei nty 'eca#se it is their interest as well as contri'#tion o" other "actors, no alternati!e is 'etter DianaB 9et, there was nothin ine!ita'le a'o#t the emer ence o" E#ropean inte ration in the "orm with which we are now "amiliar& E"ro#ean #o&iti%ians were ,and still are- instincti!ely averse to sharing nationa& sovereignt., 'es#ite rhetori%a& !&o"rishes to the contrary& Nationa& &ea'ers 'e%i'e' to share sovereignt. in s"#ranationa& organi1ations #ri ari&. -e%a"se the. #er%eive' that it was in their %o"ntriesD 3an' there!ore their own4 interests to 'o so( Ideas, intellect#al "ashion, opport#nity, chance, con!iction, calc#lation, personal predilection, and am'ition all played a part&

Ultimately, howe!er, E"ro#ean integration e erge' as it 'i' -e%a"se o! a rationa& res#onse -. #o&iti%ians, businesspeople, and other key actors to changing economic, political, and strategic circumstances, ranging from Germany's postwar recovery, to the fall of the Berlin Wall, to the acceleration of globalization. Evario"s !a%tors %ontri-"te to the agree entF *espite rowin p#'lic concern a'o#t the process and politics o" E#ropean inte ration, E"ro#eans genera&&. a%="ies%e' -e%a"se the o"t%o e see e' worthwhi&e an' the a&ternatives &ess attra%tive&

Histor.4 Idea o" "ederation "rom External, !ai&e' d#e to di""erences in eopolitical sit#ation The &essons o! the Se%on' Wor&' War, an' o! the -"rgeoning Co&' War 'etween the West and Stalins So!iet Union, -ro"ght ho e the nee' !or Western E"ro#e to "nite( E+terna&&., the USA s"##orte' the #ro%ess o! integration !ro );@< ost nota-&. in the !or o! the Garsha&& P&an( It was a' inistere' -. the Organisation !or E"ro#ean E%ono i% Co6o#eration 3OEEC-, and was 'esigne' to -"i&' a stronger !o"n'ation !or the %o"ntries o! Western E"ro#e and to act as a -"&war2 against %o "nis &

The US i'ea& o! a sing&e E"ro#ean #&an o'e&&e' on the USA in its #o&iti%a& 3!e'era&4 an' e%ono i% 3!ree tra'e, !ree ar2et4 str#ct#re was e%hoe' -. Winston Ch"r%hi&& in his "amo#s speech in 0:;< to the Academic 9o#th in =#rich4 .The cannons ha!e ceased "irin & The "i htin has stopped> '#t the dan ers ha!e not stopped& I" we are to "orm the United States o" E#rope, or whate!er name it may ta(e, we m#st 'e in now&3 U&ti ate&., the #&an to !e'era&i1e 'i' not wor2, and %o"&' never have wor2e', "or a n#m'er o" reasons4 'eca#se the geo#o&iti%a& sit"ation in E"ro#e 'i' not &en' itse&! to -e%o ing the HUSA Gar2 II> o 'eca#se the Unite' 5ing'o , sti&& a wor&' #ower in its own e.es, wo#ld not ha!e ta(en part> o Fran%e was ho#ing to res"rre%t its %entra& E"ro#ean ro&e in the !"t"re&

Histor.B Internally idea a'o#t *e"ence "ederation !ai&e' d#e to 8rance re"#se to rati"y Internally, too, so e ear&. E"ro#ean !e'era&ists wante' to %reate a new E"ro#ean or'er as a co#nterwei ht to the excesses and the "laws o" nationhood and so!erei nty that had 'ro# ht a'o#t totalitarian re imes& Altiero Spinelli was a "ormer mem'er o" the Italian Comm#nist ?arty who had 'een interned 'y @#ssolini on the island o" Aentotene& The mani"esto that he co)wrote d#rin capti!ity in 0:;0, callin "or a #nited E#rope to replace the old one o" competin nation states, had to 'e sm# led o"" the island&

Later, Spinelli3s E#ropean "ederalist mo!ement played a central role in the %reation o! the E"ro#ean De!en%e Co "nit. 3EDC4Ca pan) E#ropean 'e!en%e !or%e that was to a%t as a i&itar. %o"nterweight to the Soviet I&o%, as we&& as an a&ternative to 7er an.0s rear a ent and a%%ession to the North At&anti% Treat. Organi1ation 3NATO4( The EDC !ai&e' 3an' the !e'era&ist ove ent &ost its o ent" 4 when Fran%e re!"se' to rati!. the Treat. in );A@( Today, one o" the E#ropean ?arliament3s '#ildin s in /r#ssels is named a"ter Spinelli&

Histor.4 ?re!ent war)B common mar(et and ind#stries #nder s#pranational a#thority CECSCD Eean @onnet, the head o" 8rance3s Feneral ?lannin Commission, reacted to the collapse o" the E*C 'y rela#nchin the process o" #nitin E#rope in steps and sta es& Contrary to US plans o" immediate "ederaliGation, the mon#mental process o" a%hieving a /Unite' States o! E"ro#e0 'e an with a series o" strate ic and pra matic plannin decisions& @onnet dra"ted a o!ernment proposal "or the then)8rench 8orei n @inister Ro'ert Sch#man with the a -itio"s goa& o! a2ing a !"t"re war -etween Fran%e an' 7er an. /not on&. "nthin2a-&e '#t ateria&&. i #ossi-&eD 'y entan lin West Ferman and 8rench a""airs& @onnet3s aspiration was to create .the "irst concrete "o#ndations o" the E#ropean 8ederation which is

indispensa'le to the o! #ea%e0(

aintenan%e

The Treat. o! Paris ,0:H0-which was also si ned 'y Italy, /el i#m, L#xem'o#r , and the Netherlands a'e two i #ortant innovations( o 8irst, it %reate' a %o on ar2et !or %oa&, iron, an' stee& ,the (ey reso#rces o" the war ind#stries-, within which mar(et prices were "reely set, and importIexport d#ties, s#'sidies, and other restrictions and discriminatory practices were rad#ally remo!ed& o Second, it #&a%e' these in'"stries "n'er a s"#ranationa& a"thorit., the E"ro#ean Coa& an' Stee& Co "nit. 3ECSC4, which was o!erned 'y a .5i h A#thority3 ,o" which Eean @onnet 'ecame ?resident-, chec(ed politically 'y 'odies representin o!ernments and mem'ers o" ?arliament ,@?s-, and le ally 'y an independent $#diciary&

Histor.4 EEC) common mar(et, impro!e economy, impro!e li!in standard, pro!ide "ree mo!ement o" prod#ctions CUnder Treaty o" RomeD /#t @onnet was not merely concerned with creatin a "ederation o" states& 5e "amo#sly remar(ed that E#rope3s circ#mstances re7#ired .that we #nite E#ropeans and that we do not (eep them separated& We are not $oinin states, we are #ni"yin men&3 The next step was the #ro#osa& o! an e%ono i% "nion, which was "inally a reed in @arch 0:H2 and in%or#orate' in the Treat. o! Ro e&

The aims o" the E"ro#ean E%ono i% Co "nit. 3EEC4 were to %reate a %o on ar2et, to approximate the economic policies o" the six mem'er states, to #ro ote a har onio"s 'eve&o# ent o! their e%ono i% acti!ities, to %reate the !ra ewor2 !or gra'"a& e%ono i% e+#ansion an' sta-i&it., and to i #rove the &iving stan'ar's o! the %iti1ens o" the mem'er states& The Treaty also #rovi'e' !or the !ree ove ent o! the !a%tors o! #ro'"%tion ,la'o#r, oods, ser!ices, and capital- within the Comm#nity, common a ric#lt#ral and transport policies, and the coordination o" economic policies o" the mem'er states&

Histor.4 Inte ration o" E#rope not yet apparent accordin to EEC since it main "oc#s still on the economic de!elopment -"t this !al#e has rad#ally p#t into operation 'y de!elopment o" economy and 'y possi'ility o" political #nity Cwe cannot totally a ainst there can 'e no inte ration o" E#rope where it is only "oc#s on economyD The "&ti ate goa& o! E"ro#ean integration and #nity a. not -e i e'iate&. a##arent with res#e%t to the EEC, whi%h !o%"se' !ir &. on e%ono i% an' tra'e 'eve&o# ent& A"ter all, h" an rights, 'e o%ra%., an' the r"&e o! &aw were %ons#i%"o"s on&. -. their a-sen%e !ro the Treat. o! Ro e( ,These constit#tional principles, it sho#ld 'e noted, were already co!ered 'y the sli htly older and separate Co#ncil o" E#rope, esta'lished in 0:;:, which adopted the E#ropean Con!ention "or the ?rotection o" 5#man Ri hts and 8#ndamental 8reedoms(nown as

the E#ropean Con!ention on 5#man Ri hts, or EC5Rin 0:HJ&-

/#t more to the point, the the es o! E"ro#ean integration, #ea%e, an' #ros#erit. were gra'"a&&. -eing #"t into o#eration thro"gh the i e'iate an' #rogressive o#ening, wi'ening, an' internationa&i1ing o! the e%ono i% ar2et, and -. the &ong6ter #ossi-i&it. o! #o&iti%a& "nit.( E& ?eterson and @& Shac(leton4 C&&& D E#ropean inte ration as a pro$ect 'e an with what, in retrospect, were stri(in ly narrow and o!erwhelmin ly economic o'$ecti!es4 "irst, to mana e $ointly the prod#ction o" coal and steel> then, to de!elop a common mar(et& 8et the ear&iest oves to instit"tiona&i1e E"ro#ean %oo#eration were never seen as !ina&( They represented somethin new and #nspeci"ied, '#t which de"initely went 'eyond the inter o!ernmental cooperation o", "or example, the Co#ncil o" E#rope, with its limited

a enda and reso#rces and non'indin decision)ma(in & 8rom the 'e innin , EU instit#tion) '#ildin had a decidedly political p#rpose4 to ma(e E#ropean states e!er more m#t#ally dependent on one another& Then, as now, this aim enerates tensions 'etween those who wish to rein"orce the central instit#tions in a "ederalist direction and those who see them as instr#mental !ehicles "or maximiGin state interests&

*ominant "orm o" or aniGation wea(enin , sharin the so!erei n lead to de!elopment o" EC to resc#e the post)war nation state The creation o" the EEC and Sch#mans idea o" E#ropean inte ration can 'e seen as ima inati!e and pra matic responses to the pro$ect o" #nitin E#rope, and creatin peace and prosperity, and as an alternati!e to the US ?lan "or E#ropean Inte ration& The EEC immediately had to deal with economic challen es ,s#ch as Fermany3s rapid economic reco!ery, the worsenin East)West con"lict, and di""erin US, 8rench, and Ferman needs and o'$ecti!es-, and also with real chan es in political str#ct#res&

In +cto'er 1J01, the EU was awarded the No'el ?eace ?riGe "or its e""orts in ad!ancin peace in E#rope o!er six decades& In an important 'oo(, the historian A&an Gi&war' ar #ed that the model o" the nation statethat is, the 'o inant !or o! #o&iti%a&, e%ono i%, an' so%ia& organi1ation in Western E#rope "rom the si+teenth cent#ryhad rad#ally 'een wea(enin since the ei hteenth cent#ry& The experience o" most E#ropean states in the late 0:KJs and early 0:;Js was that the. were in%a#a-&e o! !"&!i&&ing their #ri ar. '"t.namely, the de"ence o" the national territory and the protection o" their citiGens& A!ter the Se%on' Wor&' War, E"ro#ean states ,as well as the model o" the nation state- were on the -rin2 o! %o&&a#se(

@ilward ar #ed that the new #o&iti%a& %onsens"s amon leadin 8rench, Ferman, UL, and US politicians was '#ilt on the %oa&es%en%e o! E"ro#ean an' nationa& interests, an' the sharing o! sovereignt.( The 'eve&o# ent o! the E"ro#ean Co "nit. was, there"ore, 'esigne' to res%"e the E"ro#ean nation state( At the same time, it set in train a &ength., "n#re'i%ta-&e, a -itio"s, an' %ontroversia& #ro%ess o! e%ono i% an' #o&iti%a& E"ro#ean integration(

No con"lict 'tw EC and nation)state, 'eca#se nation state is the "#ndamental #nit o" the political or aniGation o" EC, so EC does not destroy the nation states Alan S& @ilward4 That these nation)states, some o" them o" the most ancient linea e, with their distincti!e histories and cherished myths, on which ha!e 'een n#rt#red enerations o" citiGens, sho#ld declare their intention o" !ol#ntarily achie!in political #ni"ication is a political and historical chan e o" the "irst ma nit#de& 9et it remains one o" the most ill) #nderstood aspects o" recent history and present political li"e& 8or this lac( o" #nderstandin m#ch 'lame m#st lie with the a'sorption into pop#lar disc#ssion o" an ass#mption which #nderlies most o" the theoretical and scholarly writin a'o#t the E#ropean Comm#nity, the ass#mption that it is in antithesis to the nation)state& The word which is commonly #sed to descri'e the e!ol#tion o" the E#ropean Comm#nity, 6inte ration6, is itsel" a re"lection o" that ass#mption& It implies that the economies,

societies and administrations o" these national entities 'ecome rad#ally mer ed into a lar er identity& *e"enders o" the nation)state, those "or whom it remains an indispensa'le "orm o" or aniGa)tion, politically, economically, c#lt#rally or e!en psycholo ically, there"ore clamo#r "or a halt to the process o" inte ration& The most ardent s#pporters o" the E#ropean Comm#nity in ret#rn deno#nce the nation)state as an anachronistic 'arrier to the "inal achie!ement o" a more ad!anced sta e o" o!ernment and society, the s#pranation& This antithesis 'etween the concepts o" nation)state and Comm#nity has "re7#ently 'een emphasiGed 'y the E#ropean Comm#nity6s interpretation o" its own history& 5oma e has always 'een re7#ired to the idea that the Comm#nity represented the 'irth o" a new historical epoch, in which the nation%state wo#ld wither away& Lord Coc("ield, r#mo#red to ha!e 'een ori inally appointed as a E#ropean Commissioner 'y the /ritish o!ernment 'eca#se o" his alle ed scepticism a'o#t the Comm#nity, s#mmed #p his !iews a"ter his replacement 'y sayin MThe rad#al limitation o" national so!erei nty is part o" a slow and pain"#l "orward march o" h#manity&N2 A ainst s#ch

an ar #ment only a similarly cate orical statement is li(ely to ser!e& Th#s opponents o" the E#ropean Comm#nity demand that a "inite limit 'e drawn now to the process o" inte ra)tion in order to sa!e the nation& I"t is there in !a%t an antithesis -etween the E"ro#ean Co "nit. an' the nation6state$ Does the evo&"tion o! the Co "nit. i #&. the re#&a%e ent o! the nation6state as an organi1ationa& !ra ewor2 an' its event"a& s"#ersession$ It is the ar #ment o" this 'oo( that there is no s"%h antithesis an' that the evo&"tion o! the E"ro#ean Co "nit. since 0:;H has 'een an integra& #art o! the reassertion o! the nation6state as an organi1ationa& %on%e#t&

The ar #ment oes, howe!er, 'eyond this, 'eca#se the histori%a& evi'en%e #oints to the "#rther concl#sion that witho"t the #ro%ess o! integration, the west E"ro#ean nation6state ight we&& not have retaine' the a&&egian%e an' s"##ort o! its %iti1ens in the wa. that it has& The E"ro#ean Co "nit. has -een its -"ttress , an in'is#ensa-&e #art o! the nation6 stateDs #ost6war %onstr"%tion& Witho"t it, the nation6state %o"&' not have o!!ere' to its %iti1ens the sa e eas"re o! se%"rit. an' #ros#erit. which it has pro!ided and which has 9"sti!ie' its s"rviva&& A"ter 0:;H the E"ro#ean nation6 state res%"e' itse&! !ro %o&&a#se, %reate' a new #o&iti%a& %onsens"s as the 'asis o" its le itimacy, and thro# h chan es in its response to its citiGens which meant a swee#ing e+tension o! its !"n%tions an' a -itions reasserte' itse&! as the

!"n'a enta& "nit o! #o&iti%a& organi1ation& The E"ro#ean Co "nit. on&. evo&ve' as an as#e%t o! that nationa& reassertion and witho#t it, the reassertion mi ht well ha!e pro!ed impossi'le& To s"#erse'e the nation6state wo"&' -e to 'estro. the Co "nit.( o Presen%e o! nation state wi&& on&. 9"sti!ie' the #resen%e o! EC To #"t a !inite &i it to the #ro%ess o! integration wo"&' -e to wea2en the nation6state, to &i it its s%o#e an' to %"r- its #ower&

Arg" ent4 EC ma(e the nation states lose its own identity Since inte ration has always 'een care"#lly tailored to E#ropean national needs and sensi%ti!ities, and deli'erately did not "ollow the US model o" "ederalism, US commentators some%times loo( down on, and mis#nderstand, the E#ropean pro$ect& The eopolitical need "or cooperation on the crowded westernmost penins#la o" E#rasia is o"ten compared #n"a!o#ra'ly with the USA3s military a'ility to act #nilaterally& In re&ation to strategi% an' !oreign #o&i%. iss"es, Ro'ert La an "amo#sly ar #ed that .Americans are "rom @ars, and E#ropeans are "rom Aen#s3& This s"ggests that E"ro#ean states are e as%"&ate' , shorn o! their own 'istin%t nationa& i'entit., and "na-&e to !or in'ivi'"a& 9"'ge ent or to rea%h to"gh #o&iti%a& 'e%isions&

8rancis 8#(#yama re"ers derisi!ely to .those !&a--., #ros#ero"s, se&!6 satis!ie', inwar'6&oo2ing, wea26 wi&&e' states whose gran'est #ro9e%t was nothing ore heroi% than the %reation o! the Co on Gar2et3& S#ch statements rein"orce the !iew that E"ro#ean states have %a#it"&ate' to a new !or o! 3wea24 E"ro#ean governan%e an' s"rren'ere' their #o&iti%a& sovereignt.&

Gi&war' Ca#thor o" article a'o!eD %o"nter6arg"e' that it is national will to create EC and nation state is the "#ndamental or aniGation #nit o" it I. wa. o! %ontrast, @ilward ar #es that the #ost6war evo&"tion o! the EEC was 'esigne' #"r#osive&. -. the E"ro#ean states the se&ves& Contrary to the comments i!en, E"ro#ean integration %onstit"tes #re%ise&. an a%t o! nationa& wi&l that is, an e+#ression o! #o&iti%a& sovereignt.( The aspiration to reassert the nation state as the !"n'a enta& organi1ationa& "nit o" political, economic, and social existence, and to trans!er sovereign #ower to the EEC is all the more impressi!e i" one 'ears in mind the political, economic, and psycholo ical o'stacles that "irst needed to 'e o!ercome&

EC is the decision res#lt o" political co#ra e as it too( a di""er traditional approach "or the national interest D( DinanB The six co#ntries that la#nched the E#ropean Comm#nity in the 0:HJs were !ar !ro !&a--., #ros#ero"s, se&!6satis!ie', or inwar' &oo2ing& Nor were the. wea2 wi&&e'& *espite 8#(#yama6s dis #st "or a !ision de!oid o" colo#r and heroic derrin )do, it too2 a &ea# o! !aith an' rare #o&iti%a& %o"rage !or ost o! those %o"ntries to t"rn their -a%2s on tra'itiona& nation6 state as#irations and agree to e+er%ise so e o! their #owers in %o on( 8or Fran%e, in partic#lar, acceptin the EC meant a'andonin decades o" protectionism, over%o ing 'ee# 'istr"st o! 7er an., an' e -ra%ing e%ono i% o'erni1ationa drastic re!ision o" the co#ntry6s lon )standin sel") ima e as a reat power&

8or 7er an., #tterly destroyed at the end o" the war, E"ro#ean integration o!!ere' sa&vation an' internationa& reha-i&itation& Iritain sta.e' o"tsi'e the Co "nities -e%a"se its nationa& interests, or at least the o!ernment6s perception o" its national interests, pointed in a di""erent direction&

0:2K) ma$or chan es in UL) considera'le power trans"erred to EU so acco#nta'le iss#e is important The Unite' 5ing'o s o ento"s 'e%ision in );<* to 9oin what is now the E"ro#ean Union has ha' the %onse="en%e that %onsi'era-&e #o&i%. a2ing an' &aw6 a2ing #ower has -een trans!erre' !ro instit"tions in the Unite' 5ing'o to those in the EU& To ta(e only one example4 in );<?, govern enta& 'e%isions a-o"t agri%"&t"re were e+%&"sive&. atters !or U5 inisters an' the U5 Par&ia ent> now, ost as#e%ts o! #o&i%. an' &aw reg"&ating agri%"&t"re is a'e -. the EU instit"tions( We there"ore nee' to e+a ine the ain EU instit"tions that have e+e%"tive !"n%tionsnota'ly, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union, an' the Co issionand 'is%"ss iss"es o! &egiti a%. an' a%%o"nta-i&it.(

Ga9or iss"eB *emocracy de"icit) 5ow UL minister a'le to acco#nta'le to UL ?arliament within UL instit#tion A ma$or criticism le!elled at the E#ropean Union is that it s"!!ers !ro a /'e o%ra%. 'e!i%it& In the political system o" the E#ropean Union, exec#ti!e power is enerated thro# h two separate, '#t related, processes& o 8irst, #o&i%. #owers an' res#onsi-i&ities are trans!erre' !ro nationa& #o&iti%a& s.ste s to the E"ro#ean &evel, and now co!er most areas o" p#'lic policy& o Second, the E"ro#ean Union has its own instit"tions an' 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%esses& In other words, e+e%"tive #ower is 'ivi'e' verti%a&&. 3-etween the e -er states an' the E"ro#ean Union4 an' hori1onta&&. 3-etween the EU instit"tions4(

There is also a national dimension& ?#'lic acco#nta'ility is the other side o" exec#ti!e power& As we saw in Chapter 2, the U5 Par&ia ent ho&'s the e+e%"tive to a%%o"nt -. s%r"tini1ing the 'e%isions o! inisters( We need to e+a ine how U5 inisters #arti%i#ate in the wor2 o! the EU instit"tions an', i #ortant&., how the. %an -e he&' to a%%o"nt in the U5 Par&ia ent !or their 'e%isions on EU atters& In so "ar as there is a 'e o%ra%. 'e!i%it in the EU, %an this -e !i&&e' C!ro the Iritish #ers#e%tiveC -. goo' s.ste s o! a%%o"nta-i&it. within U5 instit"tions$

WHERE DOES EXECUTIVE POWER IN THE EUROPEAN UNION LIE$ Exec#ti!e power is hardly to 'e identi"ied and there"ore the iss#e o" acco#nta'ility arises Fenerally, we can say that .exec#ti!e power3 re"ers to the power o" politicians to de!elop new policy initiati!es and to ta(e action in what they see as the national interest& Their decisions and actions are implemented 'y politically ne#tral ci!il ser!ants and other o""icials& The &o%"s o! e+e%"tive or a' inistrative #ower in the E"ro#ean Union %annot -e easi&. i'enti!ie'&

K types o" actors De%ision6 a2ing ta2es #&a%e on 'i!!erent &eve&s and in!ol!es at &east three t.#es o! a%tor& In the !irst instance, the E#ropean Union has its own instit#tions, three o" which lay claim to exec#ti!e or administrati!e a#thority within the EU4 o the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& -rings together the hea's o! state or govern ent o! the e -er states and the Presi'ent o! the Co issionJ

o the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union ,collo7#ially re"erred to as the .Co"n%i& o! Ginisters0, or simply as the .Co#ncil3- #rovi'es a 'e%ision6 a2ing !or" !or the inisters o! the e -er states who share the sa e or si i&ar #ort!o&io ,"or example, health ministers or a ric#lt#re ministers-> and o the Co ission is hea'e' -. a >K6 e -er Co&&ege o! Co issioners(

The se%on' gro"# o" actors are the govern ents o! the e -er states, which want to #rote%t their own interests an' #re!eren%es, an' have their own interna& organi1ationa& arrangeL ents !or 'ea&ing with EU 'a.6to6'a. -"siness& o 8rom time to time, the nationa& govern ents a&so e+er%ise the ost !"n'a enta& o! e+e%"tive #owers when they negotiate over re!or s o! the internationa& treaties that %reate the EU instit"tions an' %on!er #ower on the &

The !ina& gro"# o" a%tive #arti%i#ants in the EU #o&i%. #ro%ess invo&ves a host o! other a%tors, s"%h as non6 e -er state govern ents, s"-nationa& &eve&s o! govern ent ,in the United Lin dom, the Scottish Government, Northern Ireland Exec#ti!e, and the Welsh Assem'ly Fo!ernment-, '#siness corporations, and interest gro"#s ,s#ch as tra'e "nions an' environ enta& gro"#s- that see( to or aniGe and represent their interests at national or E#ropean le!el&

Re in'er4 International or aniGation created 'eca#se the limitation power o" nation state The E"ro#ean Union was 'esigne' with its own "&ti&eve& set o! a%tors an' instit"tions, which high&ights not on&. their own s#e%i!i% %hara%teristi%s 3as we sha&& see4, '#t also the &i itations o! the #owers o! the nation6state( International or aniGations s#ch as the E#ropean Union ,'#t also the Co#ncil o" E#rope- were created 'eca#se ,as we saw in the extract 'y @ilward- the #o&iti%a& !or o! the nation6state was no &onger %onsi'ere' a'e="ate to g"arLantee the !"&& i #&e entation o! the 'e o%ra%. #rin%i#&e&

Iss"es4 to what extent the model o" o!t 'ecome s#pranational and whether EU 'ased on di""erent (ind o" o!ernance The 7#estions "or the pro$ect o" E#ropean inte ration were, !irst, whether, and to what e+tent, the 2nown / o'e&s0 o! govern ent %o"&' trans%en' state -or'ers an' -e trans&ate' to the s"#ranationa& &eve&> and se%on', whether the E"ro#ean Union envisage', an' was -ase' on, a 'i!!erent 2in' o! governan%e(

Instit#tional "orm o" EU ha!e to o in line with modern democratic "orces as mem'ers state will more willin to "ollow V( Iog'anorB A 8ederal Tr#st Report ,1JJ2-, p& 0: The instit#tions o" the E#ropean Union were set #p in the 0:HJs" and they were 'ased !ery m#ch on the ethos, altho# h not)the speci"ic instit#tions, o" the 8o#rth Rep#'lic in 8rance, where important political decisions were o"ten made 'y #nelected ci!il ser!ants& The le acy o" Eean @onnet was that o" an apparently depoliticised and "#nctionalist '#rea#cracy which co#ld somehow lead the way towards a #nited E#rope& The tr#th is, howe!er, that the E#ropean Union was "o#nded in the 0:HJs on a conception o" o!ernment that is o#tdated in the modern world o" participatory and asserti!e democracy& The ethos o" 8o#rth Rep#'lic 8rance ins#lated technocratic leadership "rom e""ecti!e parliamentary scr#tiny& The ethos o" consens#al democracy le itimises decision)ma(in 'y elites, with the

role o" the electors 'ein con"ined to that o" rati"yin these decisions& This method did not wor( too 'adly in the early years o" the E#ropean Comm#nity, when the lead)ers led and the "ollowers "ollowed& /#t the rea%tion in an. Ge -er States to the Gaastri%ht Treat. in 0::1 and to the Constit#tional Treaty in 1JJH showe' that, whi&e the &ea'ers %ontin"e' to tr. to &ea', the !o&&owers were no &onger wi&&ing to !o&&ow& Th#s, the instit"tiona& !or s o! the E"ro#ean Union have -e%o e in%reasing&. in%ongr"ent with the #o#"&ar !or%es -ehin' o'ern 'e o%rati% govern ent& The %entra& tas2 "or those concerned to a2e E"ro#e ore e!!e%tive an' ore 'e o%rati% is to -ring the instit"tiona& !or s into line with the democratic "orces&

Nat#re o" EU di""er "rom parliamentary democracies and also it is s#pranationalism which nation state seemed lost their so!erei nty The 'e#o&iti%i1e', !"n%tiona&ist, te%hno%rati% , &ea'ing6 !ro 6a-ove nat"re o! the E"ro#ean Union in"orms its "ni="e instit"tiona& str"%t"re, which ser!es to 'isting"ish the E"ro#ean Union !ro e+isting #ar&ia entar. 'e o%ra%ies, as well as "rom other international or aniGations& o Other Internationa& organi1ation re"lects the intergovern enta& interests o" the mem'er statesthat is, areas in which the e -er states have retaine' their a"tono o"s 3or sovereign4 #owers and are si #&. wor2ing together& This traditional method o" inter o!ernmental cooperation m#st 'e %ontraste' with the s"#ranationa& interests o! the E"ro#ean Unionthat is, areas o" action in which the e -er states have 'e%i'e' to #oo& their

sovereignt. an' 'e&egate 'e%ision a2ing #owers to the EU instit"tions ,see Chapter 01-& N# ent The Fo!ernment and ?olitics o" the E#ropean Union ,1J0J, /asin sto(e4 @acmillan-, ;1O So!erei nty is an emoti!e word, associated as it is with notions o" power, a#thority, inde)pendence, and the exercise o" will& /eca#se o" its emoti!eness and its associations, it is a word to which se!eral meanin s are attached& The most common meanin , and the one which will 'e employed here, re"ers to the le al capacity o" national decision)ma(ers to ta(e decisions witho#t 'ein s#'$ect to external restraints& This is #s#ally called national, or some)times state, so!erei nty& Inter o!ernmentalism re"ers to arran ements where'y nation)states, in sit#ations and con)ditions they can control, cooperate with one another on matters o" common interest& The existence o" control, which allows all participatin states to decide the extent and nat#re o" this cooperation, means that national so!erei nty is not directly #ndermined&

S#pranationalism in!ol!es states wor(in with one another in a manner that does not allow them to retain complete control o!er de!elopments& That is, states may 'e o'li ed to do thin s a ainst their pre"erences and their will 'eca#se they do not ha!e the power to stop decisions& S#pranationalism th#s ta(es inter) state relations 'eyond cooperation into inte ra)tion, and in!ol!es some loss o" national so!erei nty&

EU impact on wide area incl#ded nation state politics and also constit#tion which ca#sed it 'ecome non)imperial Empire The E#ropean Unions instit#tional str#ct#re is also necessitated 'y the twenty)"o#r o""i%cial lan #a es, the distri'#tion o" power alon !ertical ,'etween the E#ropean Union, the mem'er states, and their re ionsand horiGontal ,'etween the di""erent EU instit#tions- lines, the wi'e !"n%tiona& rea%h o! e+e%"tive an' &egis&ative #ower, the evo&ving nat"re o! the E"ro#ean Union, and its shi!ting geogra#hi%a& -o"n'aries& The instit#tions and proced#res were not 'esigne' !or a /s"#er6state0, but "or a a9or internationa& organi1ation, the &ater i #a%t o! whi%h on nationa& #o&iti%s an' %onstit"tions was not initia&&. !oreseen or a##re%iate'&

Example o" areas in!ol!ed4 o /y the twenty)"irst cent#ry, the tas(s "or the E#ropean Union incl#ded not merely an internal a enda ,interna& ar2et, so%ia& 9"sti%e an' #rote%tion, so&i'arit. a ong e -er states-, '#t also responses to the !inan%ia& %rises a"ter 1JJO, monitorin the '#d etary sit#ation in Freece, car-on e issions an' %&i ate %hange, and ,#nder Art& K,H- TEU- lo'al contri'#tions to .peace, sec#rity, the s#staina'le de!elopment o" the Earth, solidarity and m#t#al respect amon #eo#&es, !ree an' !air tra'e, era'i%ation o! #overt. and the #rote%tion o! h" an rights, in partic#lar the rights o! the %hi&', as well as to the strict o'ser!ance and the 'eve&o# ent o! internationa& &aw, incl#din respect "or the principles o" the United Nations Charter&

In a n#tshell, the E"ro#ean Union ha', within the space o" "i"ty years, evo&ve' "rom a re ional strate ic plannin a#thority to /the !irst non6 i #eria& E F e #ire( It is not s#rprisin that the instit#tions and proced#res do not con"orm to esta'lished standards o" democracy and acco#nta'ility ,or what /o danor re"ers to as participatory and asserti!e democracy3 and .e""ecti!e parliamentary scr#tiny3-&

Tension -tw intergovt an' s"#ragovt) di""ic#lt in incorporate s#pranational element at the same time maintain nation states3 interest in maintainin control o!er policy and the need to esta'lish instit#tional str#ct#re and hold EU actors to acco#nt The two!o&' tension -etween intergovern enta&is an' s"#ranationa&is sho#ld 'e 'orne in mind when examinin the instit#tions& 8irst, there is a 'i!!i%"&t., which is in%or#orate' in the E"ro#ean Union0s governing str"%t"re, in stri2ing a !air -a&an%e -etween the s"#ranationa& 3EU4 e&e ent and the e -er states0 interest in aintaining %ontro& over the E"ro#ean #o&i%. #ro%ess thro"gh intergovern enta& %oo#eration&

Se%on', there is the nee' to give the E"ro#ean Union a "ni="e instit"tiona& str"%t"re ,precisely 'eca#se it is not an ordinary international or aniGation and 'eca#se it is not a state-, and the nee' to resort to o&' an' new wa.s in whi%h to ho&' EU instit"tions an' a%tors to a%%o"nt(

THE EU INSTITUTIONS Whatever the #o&iti%a& an' &ega& #it!a&&s ha!e 'een, the govern ents o! the e -er states have, on severa& o%%asions, agree' to %reate an' a en' the treaties governing the EU instit"tions& In this section, we t#rn to examine the instit#tions that exercise exec#ti!e power& Chapter 01 will "oc#s on the le islati!e "#nctions o" the E#ropean Unionespecially those o" the E#ropean ?arliament&

C+NSTITUTI+NAL 8+UN*ATI+NS +8 T5E EUR+?EAN UNI+N The E#ropean Union3s instit#tions, proced#res, and o'$ecti!es are set o#t in two treaties& The Treat. on the F"n%tioning o! the E"ro#ean Union 3TFEU4, formerly the Treaty Establishing the European Community (TEC), means the Treat. esta-&ishing 3what was then %a&&e'4 the E"ro#ean E%ono i% Co "nit., si ned at Rome on 1H @arch 0:H2 ,as a en'e' an' rena e' -. the Treat. o! Lis-on-& The Treat. on E"ro#ean Union 3TEU4 eans the Treat. on E"ro#ean Union, si ned at @aastricht on 2 8e'r#ary 0::1 ,as a en'e' -. the Treat. o! Lis-on-&

Instit#tions o" EU Arti%&e )* TEU The Union shall ha!e an instit#tional "ramewor( which shall aim to promote its !al#es, ad!ance its o'$ecti!es, ser!e its interests, those o" its citiGens and those o" the @em'er States, and ens#re the consistency, e""ecti!eness and contin#ity o" its policies and actions& The Union6s instit#tions shall 'e4 o the E"ro#ean Par&ia E#ropean Co#ncil, o the Co"n%i&, o the E"ro#ean Co ission ,hereina"ter re"erred to as Mthe CommissionM-, o the Co#rt o" E#stice o" the E#ropean Union, o the E"ro#ean Centra& Ian2, o the Co"rt o! A"'itors& ent, o the

Each instit#tion shall act within the limits o" the powers con"erred on it in the Treaties, and in con"ormity with the proced#res, conditions and o'$ecti!es set o#t in them& The instit#tions shall practice m#t#al sincere cooperation& The pro!isions relatin to the E#ropean Central /an( and the Co#rt o" A#ditors and detailed pro!isions on the other instit#tions are set o#t in the Treaty on the 8#nctionin o" the E#ropean Union& The E#ropean ?arliament, the Co#ncil and the Commission shall 'e assisted 'y an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee o" the Re ions actin in an ad!isory capacity&

a- THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL6 provide impetus for development and set political direction and priorities The E#ropean Co#ncil was not listed as a "ormal instit#tion o" the E#ropean Union in the pre!io#s Treaty re ime and so the E#ropean Union instit#tions were not le ally 'o#nd 'y its decisions& The Lis'on Treaty 'oosts the powers o" the E#ropean Co#ncil 'y allowin it to de"ine the Unions directions and priorities ,rather than merely settin o#t #idelines-& Arti%&e )A TEU o The E"ro#ean Co"n%i& shall #rovi'e the Union with the ne%essar. i #et"s "or its 'eve&o# ent and shall de"ine the genera& #o&iti%a& 'ire%tions an' #riorities thereo"& o It sha&& not e+er%ise &egis&ative !"n%tions&

Example o" the .$o's3 in!ol!ed4 8rom an EU #ers#e%tive, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&4 o pro!ides a eneral political impet#s to the constr#ction o" E#rope> o sets o#t approaches and iss#es eneral political #idelines "or the E#ropean Union> o deli'erates on EU matters> o initiates cooperation in new areas o" acti!ity> o expresses a common position in 7#estions o" external relations> and o amends and simpli"ies the Treaties&

@em'ers o" E&Co#ncil The E#ropean Co#ncil consists o"4 o the twent.6 eight hea's o! state or govern ent, o its Presi'ent, and the o Presi'ent o! the Co ission(

@eetin ) 1 times in < months and the mem'ers It is a s" it eeting that "se' to -e %haire' -. the &ea'er o! the e -er state that he&' the #resi'en%. o! the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union at the ti e ,the #resi'en%. rotate' -etween EU e -er states ever. si+ onthso Co"n%i& o! E"ro#ean Union is Co"n%i& o! Ginister E'i!!erent !ro E"ro#ean Co"n%i&F Those eetings were a&so atten'e' -.B o the inisters !or !oreign a!!airs, o a e -er o! the Co ission, and o a s a&& n" -er o! %ivi& servants& E"ro#ean Co"n%i& eetings were he&' in %a eraB no one e&se was a&&owe' to -e #resent and no !or a& in"tes were 2e#t& In s#m, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& was hea'e' -. the %hie! e+e%"tives o!

a&& e -er states, who were assiste' -. a &i ite' n" -er o! #"-&i% o!!i%ia&s, who et in a %&ose' roo with no assistants( S#mmit meetin s ha!e ta(en place sporadically since 0:<0& /#t it was not #ntil 0:2H ,when the E#ropean Co#ncil was esta'lished- that it 'ecame a "ormal part o" the EC3s decision)ma(in process> it was not #ntil 0:O2 that its existence and importance was "ormally reco niGed in the Sin le E#ropean Act& Sin%e );;;, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& has et at &east !o"r ti es a .ear in the middle and at the end o" each presidency o" the Co#ncil ,see 8i #re O&0-&

?residency) 1 and hal" year and elected 'y P@A system In order to ma(e the E#ropean Co#ncil more proacti!e, the Lis'on Treaty created the post o" a Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, who is e&e%te' -. ="a&i!ie' a9orit. "or a ter o! two6an'6a6ha&! .ears ,renewa'le once-& The ?resident, who may not hold a national o""ice, is e&e%te' -. the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& "n'er ="a&i!ie' a9orit. voting 3MGV4(

Role o" ?resident Accordin to Art& 0H,<- TEU, the role o" the ?resident is4 o to g"i'e the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& ,'y chairin it-, o to %oor'inate its wor2&oa' ,'y ens#rin the preparation and contin#ity o" the wor( o" the E#ropean Co#ncil in cooperation with the ?resident o" the Commission-, and o to ens"re that the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&0s 'e%isions are i #&e ente' ,"or example, 'y #resenting a re#ort to the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent a"ter each o" the meetin s o" the E#ropean Co#ncil-&

In No!em'er 1JJ:, /el ian ?rime @inister 5erman !an Romp#y was chosen as the "irst ?resident o" the E#ropean Co#ncil d#rin a s#mmit meetin in /r#ssels "or a period o" two and a hal" years, renewa'le once& +n 0 @arch 1J01 van Ro #". was re6e&e%te' 'y the heads o" state or o!ernment, and the period o" his second term is "rom 0 E#ne 1J01 to KJ No!em'er 1J0;&

8orei n a""air trian le The intro'"%tion o! a Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& is li(ely to c&ash with e+isting senior #ositions in the E#ropean Union, s#ch as the Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co ission ,as we shall see- and the High Re#resentative o! the Union !or Foreign A!!airs an' Se%"rit. Po&i%.( The #ost o! High Re#resentative was introd#ced 'y the Treaty o" Amsterdam ,0:::- and expanded #nder the Treaty o" Lis'on ,the 5i h Representati!e is also Aice)?resident o" the Commission and th#s can directly in"l#ence le islati!e proposals in the E#ropean Union-& In No!em'er 1JJ:, /aroness Catherine Ashton too( o!er "rom Ea!ier Solana as the EU3s 5i h Representati!e ,a #osition that the e'ia "n'erstan's as the EU !oreign inister, !oreign #o&i%. s"#re o, or the EU0s %hie! 'i#&o at-&

The two Presi'ents and the High Re#resentative have ro&es in the E"ro#ean Union0s e+terna& re#resentation& This new /!oreign a!!airs triang&e0 wi&& there!ore re="ire %oor'ination to avoi' signi!i%ant over&a# an' sharing o! res#onsi-i&ities(

?resident is not dictatorI a real president '#t only a chairman, a "acilitator altho# h 8rance ar #ed that ?resident 'e the ?resident o" whole E#rope R( Cor-ett, :( Peterson, an' E( Io -erg4 A n#m'er o" "actors led to creation o" a 6permanent6 and "#ll)time ?resident& ?re!io#sly, the six)month term o" o""ice meant a new ? e) 6dent e!ery second or third meetin , ma(in con%tin#ity and consistency impossi'le& The p eparation o" E#ropean Co#ncil meetin s, in!ol!in cons#ltation o" all 5eads o" Fo!ernment was, with s#ccessi!e enlar ements o" the Union, 'ecomin increasin ly onero#s "or any ?resident or ?rime @inister with their own national o!ernment to r#n& Also, the tas( o" representin the EU externally at s#mmit meetin s on "orei n policy iss#es, whilst at the same time representin their own co#ntry, was "elt to 'e inappropriate& @em'er states with an inter o!ernmentalist !iew o" the EU saw the E#ropean Co#ncil ?resident as a #se"#l co#nterwei ht to the ?resident o" the Commission&

Gan. Fren%h o-servers, i!en their domestic instit#tional system, see the Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& as a sort o! Presi'ent o! E"ro#e, with the Commission ?resident demoted to the stat#s o" a 8rench ?rime @inister, de!oted lar ely to internal a""airs and e!en then de"errin on ma$or decisions to the ?resident& That view is not share' -. a&&( The !irst E"ro#ean Co"n%i& Presi'ent, Van Ro #". 'es%ri-e' hi se&! as -eing &ess than a Presi'ent -"t ore than a %hair anB a !a%i&itator, not a 'i%tator(

E&Co#ncil) ma(e on direction "or Commission and p#t press#re on Co#ncil, reach political a reement 8ormally, the ain e+e%"tive tas2s o" the E#ropean Co#ncil are descri'ed in Art& 0H TEU> o in reality, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& #rovi'es overa&& strategi% 'ire%tion !or the Co ission, ommission propose legislation o e+e%"tes #o&i%ies #nder the second and third pillars, o #"ts #ress"re on the Co"n%i& to a'o#t new #o&i%. %o #eten%es !or the E"ro#ean Union #nder Art& KH1 T8EU ,the so6%a&&e' /!&e+i-i&it. %&a"se0 whi%h ena-&es the Co"n%i& to ta2e a##ro#riate eas"res when the Treat. 'oes not #rovi'e the ne%essar. #owers-, ouncil is main decision making body like e!ecutive

o and rea%hes #o&iti%a& agree ents on %ontentio"s &egis&ative #ro#osa&s& In other words, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& is a 'e%ision6 a2ing heav.weight that lean @onnet descri'ed as the /Provisiona& E"ro#ean 7overn ent0(

E#ropean Co#ncil meetin s seemed li(e in"ormal and act 'y only reach consens#s '#t not P@A, those iss#es did not reached then postponed raised 7#estion o" le itimacy o" decision ma(in E"ro#ean Co"n%i& eetings are %hara%teri1e' -. #rivate an' in!or a& /!iresi'e %hats0, which ha!e a'vantages !or #o&iti%a& 'is%"ssions ,the ?resident o" the E#ropean Co#ncil and the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy were elected 'y the heads o" state and o!ernment o!er dinner in /r#ssels in No!em'er 1JJ:- and "or extraordinary meetin s ,s#ch as the meetin on 10 Septem'er 1JJ0 in the wa(e o" the terrorist attac(s in the USA-& I"t the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& %an a%t on&. -. rea%hing %onsens"s& This process is &ess e!!i%ient than, sa., MGV ,in which mem'er states ha!e !otes that are wei hted ro# hly accordin to the siGe o" their pop#lations- and those iss#es on

which agree ent is not rea%he' are #ost#one'& The a-sen%e o! ore so#histi%ate' #ro%e'"ra& r"&es an' written re%or's o" its meetin s p#ts a ="estion ar2 over the &egiti a%. o! its 'e%ision6 a2ing #owers( The e+isten%e o! s"%h a high6&eve& -o'., while ne%essar. !or the !"n%tioning o! the E"ro#ean Union, is at o''s with the 'e&i%ate -a&an%e 'etween the nee' to share sovereignt. an' the 'esire to retain nationa& %ontro& that "n'er&ies the instit"tiona& ar%hite%t"re o! the E"ro#ean Union(

E#ropean co#ncil #ide other instit#tion and "acilitate ma$or decisions and also in"ormal ar'iter "or pro'lems that Co#ncil o" E#ropean Union #na'le to resol!e howe!er, decision is not 'indin Cpre!ent ridloc(D The Treaty $#sti"ication "or the E"ro#ean Co"n%il is to #rovi'e &ea'ershi#4 it g"i'es the other EU instit"tions an' !a%i&itates a9or 'e%isions in ever. area o! #o&i%.& /#t the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& has a&so Cin!or a&&. and o!er time a%="ire' the stat"s o! a !ina& ar-iter !or #ro-&e s that the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union is "na-&e to reso&ve o This #ra%ti%e has re%eive' !or a& re%ognition in re&ation to Co on Foreign an' Se%"rit. Po&i%.4 see Art& K0,1TEU&

It has no !or a& #ower to a2e -in'ing 'e%isions'#t it "ills a ap as the #ltimate decision)ma(in a#thority& This is an essentia& ro&e within a !e'era& str"%t"re, 'eca#se the di""erent layers o" power can res#lt in 'ottlenec(s and 'loc(a es& As the en ine 'ehind E#ropean inte ration, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& has e!!e%tive&. s#earhea'e' Treat. re!or s an' #revente' gri'&o%2(

No power to propose le islate '#t can raised iss#e o" national interest to p#ll emer ency 'ra(e Note that the Lis'on Treaty still !a&&s short o! giving the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& the #ower to #ro#ose &egis&ation, which ,as will 'e seenhas always 'een the central role of the European Commission. Ge -er states are a&&owe' to re!er iss"es to the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& i" they consider their nationa& interests to -e at sta2e( The E"ro#ean Co"n%i& is then entit&e' to #"&& the /e ergen%. -ra2e0&

8ind di""ic#lt to ma(e decision in secret with new "oc#s on acco#nta'ility and transparency With a new !o%"s on a%%o"nta-i&it. an' trans#aren%. ,see ,'- The Co#ncil o" the E#ropean Union-, the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& wi&& a&so !in' it ore 'i!!i%"&t in the !"t"re to a2e 'e%isions in se%ret(

-4 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION The Co#ncil o" the E#ropean Union is also in!or a&&. 2nown as the /Co"n%i& o! Ginisters0, and the Treaties re"er to it si #&. as the /Co"n%i&0( It is the EU3s #ri ar. 'e%ision6 a2ing instit"tion, and its Treaty 'asis is as "ollows&

Article 0< TEU The Co"n%i& sha&&, 9oint&. with the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent, e+er%ise &egis&ative an' -"'getar. !"n%tions& It shall carry o#t policy) ma(in and coordinatin "#nctions as laid down in the Treaties& The Co#ncil shall %onsist o! a re#resentative o! ea%h Ge -er State at inisteria& &eve&, who may commit the o!ernment o" the @em'er State in 7#estion and cast its !ote& The Co#ncil shall a%t -. a ="a&i!ie' a9orit. except where the Treaties pro!ide otherwise&

As "rom 0 No!em'er 1J0;, a ="a&i!ie' a9orit. sha&& -e 'e!ine' as at least HHQ o" the mem'ers o" the Co#ncil, %o #rising at &east !i!teen o! the an' re#resenting Ge -er States %o #rising at &east NAO o! the #o#"&ation o! the Union( o A -&o%2ing inorit. "st in%&"'e at &east !o"r Co"n%i& e -ers, "ailin which the 7#ali"ied ma$ority shall 'e deemed attained& o The other arran ements o!ernin the 7#ali"ied ma$ority are laid down in Article 1KO,1- o" the Treaty on the 8#nctionin o" the E#ropean Union& The transitional pro!isions relat n to the de"inition o" the 7#ali"ied ma$ority which shall 'e applica'le #ntil K0 +cto'er 1J6i; ana tnose which shall 'e applica'le "rom 0 No!em'er 1J0; to K0 @arch 1J02 are laid down in the ?rotocol on transitional pro!isions&

The Co#ncil shall meet in di""erent con"i #rations, the list o" which shall 'e adopted in accordance with Article 1K< o" the Treaty on the 8#nctionin o" the E#ropean Union The Feneral A""airs Co#ncil sha&& ens"re %onsisten%. in the wor2 o! the 'i!!erent Co"n%i& %on!ig"rations( o It shall #re#are an' ens"re the !o&&ow6"# to eetings o! the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, in &iaison with the Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& an' the Co ission&

@ixin with le islat#re and exec#ti!e The Co#ncil is #art o! the E"ro#ean Unions e+e%"tive ,with the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& an' the Co ission- and #art o! the E"ro#ean Unions &egis&at"re ,with the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent-&

@em'er) representati!e "rom each ministerial o" nation states whom the mem'ership is chan ed accordin to partic#lar "ield is in!ol!ed and there"ore as ministers can acco#nta'le 'e"ore national parliament At "irst si ht, it is an intergovern enta& instit"tion that %o #rises one inister !ro ea%h o! the twent.6eight govern ents, and #rovi'es a ven"e in whi%h #o&iti%ians an' -"rea"%rats !ro the nationa& an' EU &eve&s %an negotiate an' &egis&ate& The composition, or aniGation, and powers o" the Co#ncil are 'esigne' to a%%" "&ate an' arti%"&ate nationa& interests( Altho# h the Co#ncil is a permanent instit#tion, it 'oes not have a %onstant e -ershi#& Its %o #osition is 'eter ine' -. the #arti%"&ar iss"es "n'er %onsi'eration&

Ea%h Ginister re#resents, an' is th"s e #owere' to %o it, his or her govern ent& The Ginister is then a%%o"nta-&e -e!ore the nationa& Par&ia ent, which ens"res the 3in'ire%t4 'e o%rati% &egiti a%. o" the decisions o" the Co#ncil&

8#nctions s"#ranationa&&.) le islate, coordinate economic policy, external relation, appro!e '#d et When it comes to decision)ma(in and law)ma(in within the Co#ncil, the Co#ncil wears di""erent .hats3 dependin on which proced#re is #sed to ma(e a partic#lar policy& Under the TFEU, the Co#ncil is responsi'le "or4 o ena%ting E"ro#ean &egis&ation ,o"ten in #nison with the E#ropean ?arliament #sin the ordinary le islati!e proced#reo %oor'inating the e%ono i% #o&i%ies o" the mem'er states o the e+terna& re&ations o! the E"ro#ean Union ,"or example, si nin international a reements with third co#ntries or other international or aniGations-, and o ,to ether with the E#ropean ?arliament- a##roving the EUs -"'get(

In these areas, the %hara%ter o! the Co"n%i& is ain&. s"#ranationa&, meanin that the e -er states have 'e%i'e' to 'e&egate 3or #oo&04 their 'e%ision6 a2ing #owers to the E"ro#ean Union(

8#nction intergovern enta&&.) settin EU a enda #ideline 'y !otin In relation to the TEU 3%o on !oreign an' se%"rit. #o&i%.-, the character o" the Co#ncil is inter o!ernmental, meanin that e -er states have retaine' their sovereign #owers over these #o&i%. areas, -"t have 'e%i'e' to wor2 together( So, the Co"n%i& is res#onsi-&e !or setting the EU0s agen'a -ase' on g"i'e&ines set -. the e -er states ,meetin in the E#ropean Co#ncil-& Co"n%i& 'e%isionsCin these ore nationa&&. sensitive areasChave to -e "nani o"s, which in practice means that ea%h e -er state has a right to veto these 'e%isions(

N( N"gentB The e+tent to whi%h the Co"n%i& "st wor2 with, an' is 'e#en'ent "#on the %oo#eration o!, the Co ission an' the EP in respect o" policy and decision)ma(in !aries 'etween policy areas and accordin to what type o" decisions are 'ein made& In 'road terms, the Co"n%i& has ost roo !or in'e#en'ent anoe"vre when it is not a%ting within Dthe Co "nit. etho'D, "or then the roles and powers o" the Commission and the E? are normally restricted& Amon st policy iss#es where the Co "nit. etho' 'oes not a##&. are !oreign an' 'e!en%e #o&i%., 'oth o" which ha!e increased enor o"s&. in i #ortan%e in re%ent .ears as the EU has %o e to iss"e n" ero"s 'e%&arations on !oreign #o&i%. atters an' has %o e to engage in an arra. o! !oreign #o&i%. a%tions(

Assistants Cmore details re"er 'elowD The Co#ncil is assiste' -. the Co ittee o! Per anent Re#resentatives 3COREPER-, or .a -assa'ors0 to the E"ro#ean Union "rom mem'er states, which is res#onsi-&e !or #re#aring the wor2 o! the Co"n%i& an' %arr.ing o"t tas2s assigne' to it( The Unite' 5ing'o 0s o!!i%ia& 'e&egation is 2nown as CU5REP0(

*irect exec#ti!e power and hea!y wei ht on le islat#re on proposal as well as Co#ncil is democratically elected who en$oy more political wei ht than Commission In s#m, the Co"n%i& has !or a& 'e%ision6 a2ing #owers a%ross a&& #o&i%. areas that ma(e #p the E#ropean Union& The TEU es#e%ia&&. #rovi'es !or 'ire%t Co"n%i& e+e%"tive a"thorit.& I"t even "n'er the TFEU, Art& 1;0 i!es the Co"n%i& the #ower to /re="est the Co ission to "n'erta2e an. st"'ies the Co"n%i& considers desira'le "or the attainment o" the common o'$ecti!es, and to s#'mit to it any appropriate proposals6& The Co"n%i& has "se' this #rovision to iss"e %&ear instr"%tions to the Co ission& Ie%a"se the inisters are 'e o%rati%a&&. e&e%te', the

Co"n%i& en9o.s #o&iti%a& weight that the Co ission ,consistin o" appointees- cannot easily i nore&

S#mmary o" Co#ncil3s "#nctions The Co#ncil, there"ore, has the "ollowin "#nctions& Legis&ativeIt 'eve&o#s an' a2es &aws 9oint&. with the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent #nder co) decision ,see Chapter 01-& E+e%"tiveIt has 'ire%t res#onsi-i&it. in #o&i%. areas s"%h as Co on Foreign an' Se%"rit. Po&i%., and ,c#rrently?olice and E#dicial Cooperation in Criminal @atters, "or exercisin exec#ti!e powers& SteeringIt %on%&"'es internationa& agree ents !or the E"ro#ean Union with third states or international or aniGations& For" It %oor'inates the -roa' a%roe%ono i% #o&i%ies o! the e -er states&

Importance o" Co#ncil) show contin#in power o" nation states in inte ration o" E#rope The "ollowin commentator compares the Co#ncil to .a cl#' o" mem'er o!ernments3 which the national ministers #se to compete "or in"l#ence& F( Ha.es6RenshawB The Co"n%i& is regar'e' as the %entra& -o'. 'y those who stress the i #ortan%e o! nationa& interests as the !a%tor explainin o#tcomes in the EU& Indeed, the Co#ncil as it exists and operates today may 'e viewe' as one o! the &iving s. -o&s o! the %ontin"ing #ower o! the e -er states in the EU, and o" the 'esire o! the nationa& govern ents to re ain at the %entre o! the #ro%ess o! E"ro#ean integration&

Sin%e it is a&so re#resentative o! the e -er govern ents who %onstit"te the intergovern enta& %on!eren%es ,IFCs- that initiate constit#tional re"orm in the EU, we %an e+#e%t the Co"n%i& to en'"re an' to %ontin"e to #&a. a %entra& ro&e in the &arger EU(

Arg" entB Co#ncil more toward the s#pranational which not necessary interest o" lar er mem'er stated determine the o#tcome '#t the cooperation with Commission and E? F( Ha.es6RenshawB *espite 'ein the EU6s inter o!ernmental instit#tion par excellence, howe!er, C&&& D in reality, the Co"n%i& is a "ni="e -&en' o! the intergovern enta& an' the s"#ranationa&& It represents mem'er state interests that are a re ated #nder conditions !re="ent&. owing ore to s"#ranationa&it. than to intergovern enta&is , and it is not ne%essari&. the interests o! the &arger e -er states that 'eter ine the !ina& o"t%o es& In addition, the Co"n%i& as an instit"tion wor2s %&ose&. with the Co ission an' the EP, the !iews o" -oth o! whi%h in!or its wor2 an' i #inge in i #ortant wa.s on its o"t#"t&

S"ggest re!or 4 /ecome explicit le islat#re other than exec#ti!e +R has core exec#ti!e power F( Ha.es6RenshawB C&&&D Two o##osing s"ggestions "or the Co#ncil lin er in the de'ate o!er EU instit#tional re"orm& +ne ad!ocates that it sho"&' -e%o e an e+#&i%it&. re#resentative an' &egis&ative rather than an e+e%"tive instit"tion( The other asserts that the Co"n%i& sho"&' -e a'e even ore e+#&i%it&. 'o inant, as the %ore o! e+e%"tive #ower within the EU( The Lis'on Treaty has neither resol!ed this ar #ment nor clari"ied the sit#ation& It is li(ely that the Co#ncil will ha!e to contin#e to ser!e 'oth camps, with all o" the constit#tional and operational am'i #ities that this implies&

Co #osition an' str"%t"re) ministers from nation states appointed by PM indirect legitimacy and indirectly elected! depend on sub"ects The Co#ncil consists o" many le!els& At the top le!el, the Co"n%i& /%onsists o! a re#resentaLive o! ea%h Ge -er State at inisteria& &eve&D( The e -ers o! the Co"n%i& are not 'ire%t&. e&e%te', -"t are 'is#at%he' to the Co"n%i& in their %a#a%it. as inisters o" their respecti!e national o!ernment ,or occasionally, in the case o" /el i#m and Fermany, ministers "rom the re ional le!el-& The. eet in Ir"sse&s or L"+e -o"rg, and eetings &ast a 'a. or two&

As an instit#tion, there is on&. one Co"n%i&, -"t it %"rrent&. eets in ten 'i!!erent %on!ig"rations, dependin on the s#'$ects #nder disc#ssion& o Feneral A""airs ,FACo 8orei n A""airs ,8ACo Economic and 8inancial A""airs ,Eco"ino A ric#lt#re and 8isheries ,A ri"isho E#stice and 5ome A""airs Co#ncil ,E5Ao Employment, Social ?olicy, 5ealth and Cons#mer A""airs Co#ncil ,E?SC+o Competiti!eness ,C+C+@o Transport, Telecomm#nications and Ener y ,TTEo En!ironment ,ENAIo Ed#cation, 9o#th, C#lt#re and Sport ,E9C-& Th#s a ric#lt#re ministers "rom the mem'er states meet to disc#ss and ma(e decisions a'o#t "armin , transport ministers a'o#t transport, and so on&

Ea%h Co"n%i& has the #ower to 'is%"ss iss"es, ena%t &egis&ation within its area o" competence, and .to %o it the govern ent o! the Ge -er State0& Ginisters are "s"a&&. a##ointe' or nominated to that position -. their Pri e Ginister, and th#s en9o. in'ire%t &egiti a%. when the. eet in the Co"n%i&&

) Co#ncil ta(e collecti!e responsi'ility) not clear whom they represent and to whom they acco#nta'le When athered to ether in the Co#ncil, howe!er, the. inevita-&. ta2e on %o&&e%tive res#onsi-i&ities, and it is no &onger %&ear who the. re#resent an' to who the. are a%%o"nta-&e(

) Aotin mostly 'y P@A, sometime area need #nanimo#s or simple ma$ority De#en'ing on the iss"e in ="estion, which is o!erned 'y r#les laid down in the Treaties, inisters in the Co"n%i& vote on the -asis o! si #&e a9orit., MGV, or "nani it.& o Under the Treat. o! Ni%e, si #&e a9orit. voting was "s"a&&. "se' !or #ro%e'"ra& or other non6%ontroversia& atters& Accordin ly, each mem'er state has a sin le !ote and "o#rteen !otes in "a!o#r are re7#ired to adopt a meas#re in the E#ropean Union o" twenty)"i!e pl#s& o Nationa&&. sensitive areas, s#ch as "orei n policy and de"ence, EU enlar ement, taxation, and social sec#rity still ha!e to 'e a reed "nani o"s&. -. a&& e -er states( An aggrieve' e -er state %an e+er%ise its #ower o! veto, or a-stain !ro voting ,which, li(e a yes3 !ote,

allows a reement 'y the others to o ahead-& o Gost 'e%isions 3%a( K?O4 in the Co"n%i& are ta2en -. MGV& Each mem'er state is allocated a certain n#m'er o" !otes to re!&e%t as %&ose&. as #ossi-&e its si1e an' #o#"&ation( rermany, 8rance, Italy, and the United Lin dom Spain and ?oland Romania The Netherlands /el i#m, CGech Rep#'lic, Freece, 5#n ary, and ?ort# al A#stria, /#l aria, and Sweden *enmar(, Ireland, Lith#ania, Slo!a(ia, 8inland, and Croatia Cypr#s, Estonia, Lat!ia, L#xem'o#r , and Slo!enia @alta T+TAL

) New voting s.ste 4 C"#ll e""ect "rom 0);)1J02D de"a#lt #nder P@A system except tax and social sec#rity 'y #nanimo#s The Lis'on Treaty ma(es si ni"icant chan es to the r#les "or calc#latin a 7#ali"ied ma$ority& The %"rrent r"&es wi&&, however, %ontin"e to o#erate e+%&"sive&. "nti& *) O%to-er >?)@> -etween ) Nove -er >?)@ an' *) Gar%h >?)<, an. e -er state %an re="est that a vote revert to these r"&es& That eans that the new r"&es on&. ta2e !"&& e!!e%t !ro ) A#ri& >?)<( Under the Lis-on Treat., MGV -e%o es the 'e!a"&t voting etho' in the Co"n%i& ,Art& 0<,KTEU-, an' in%&"'es areas #revio"s&. s"-9e%t to "nani it. ,these incl#de $#stice and home a""airs, and a n#m'er o" matters

relatin to "orei n and de"ence policy-& Sensitive areas, s"%h as ta+ an' so%ia& se%"rit., however, re ain to -e 'e%i'e' -. "nani it.( /+R O&; T5E C5ANFES T+ P@A UN*ER T5E LIS/+N TREAT90 Treaty o" Nice#sed excl#si!ely #ntil K0 The do#'le ma$ority P@A system #sed +cto'er 1J0; "rom 0 No!em'er 1J0; and excl#si!ely "rom 0 April 1J02 8or a proposal "rom the Commission or 5i h Representati!e to pass4 o there m#st 'e !otes "rom at least HHQ o" Co#ncil mem'ers ,one mem'er, one !ote- ,that is, at least "i"teen mem'er states, c#rrently-> and o representin at least <HQ o" the Union pop#lation& 8or other proposals to pass4 o there m#st 'e !otes "rom at least 21Q o" Co#ncil mem'ers ,one mem'er, one !ote- ,that is, at least twenty mem'er states, c#rrently-> and

o representin at least <HQ o" the Union pop#lation& 0O See4 Art& 1JH TEC> Art& 0< LTEU> Art& 1KO T8EU> ?rotocol on transitional pro!isions& Where not all mem'ers ta(e part, "or a proposal to pass, it needs4 o the same proportion o" wei hted !otes ,2K&:Q-> o the same proportion o" the n#m'er o" Co#ncil mem'ers ,a ma$ority or two) thirds-> and Where not all mem'ers ta(e part, "or a proposal to pass, it needs4 o the same proportion o" !otes ,HHQ or 21Q-> and o the same percenta e o" the pop#lation o" the mem'er states concerned ,<HQ- o" the mem'ers ta(in part& o the same percenta e o" the pop#lation o" the mem'er states concerned ,<1Q- o" the mem'ers ta(in part& So#rce4 5o#se o" Lords E#ropean Union Committee, The Treaty o" Lis'on4 An Impact Assessment,

Tenth Report, Session 1JJ2)JO ,5L ?aper <1)0-&

) P@A only need HHQ as compared to c#rrent Nice treaty need 2K&:Q 8or present p#rposes, it is important to note that #nder the c#rrent allocationalso called wei htin 3o" !otes in the Ni%e Treat., a ="a&i!ie' a9orit. wi&& -e rea%he' i!4 o a a9orit. o! e -er states a##rove ,in some cases, a two) thirds ma$ority-> and o a ini " o! >N? votes is %ast in !avo"r o" the proposal, o#t o" a total o" KH1 !otes ,ro# hly <*(; #er %ent o! the votes-& A e -er state a. as2 !or %on!ir ation that the !otes in "a!o#r represent at &east N> #er %ent o! the tota& #o#"&ation o! the E"ro#ean Union( I! this is !o"n' not to -e the %ase, the 'e%ision wi&& not -e a'o#te'(

The most si ni"icant chan e to 'e made 'y the Lis'on Treaty is the #er%entage re'"%tion !ro <*(; #er %ent to AA #er %ent re="ire' !or MGV an' tota& #o#"&ation nee' NAO on a Commission proposal, -e%a"se it a2es EU &aw6 a2ing easier an' ore e!!i%ient(

6 I&o%2ing inorit.) need ; mem'er states to oppose it Calso pre!ent only K lar er states to 'loc( it, altho# h they may contri'#te more than KH Q oppose pop#lation '#t need ; states to oppose itD The Lis'on Treaty "ormaliGes the r#les re ardin the "ormation o" a -&o%2ing inorit.& At &east !o"r %o"ntries are now nee'e' to !or a -&o%2ing inorit.& This system #&a%es %o"ntries with a s a&&er #o#"&ation on a !airer !ooting with the &arger e -er states& The new r"&e is s#e%i!i%a&&. 'esigne' to #revent an. three o! the &arge states ,the United Lin dom, Fermany, 8rance, and Italy!ro -eing a-&e to -&o%2 a #ro#osa& 3an. three o! these states wo"&' re#resent ore than *A #er %ent o! the Union0s #o#"&ation4(

I" the #o#"&ation re="ire ent 3NA #er %ent4 were not et, a !o"rth state wo"&' -e nee'e'( o I! * &arge state o##ose Ethat ean ore that *AO o##ose'F that ean sti&& nee' @th state to o##ose it i! otherwise, &ess than NAO, the a%t sti&& wi&& -e #asse' The re="ire ent !or at &east !o"r e -er states wo"&' re ain, regar'&ess o! !"t"re 'e ogra#hi% shi!ts in e -er states&

) I" #nanimo#s, then in"l#ence shared e7#ally> i" #nder P@A, ens#re the smaller mem'er states wor(in to ether and "ormin the consens#s So who wie&'s the in the Co"n%i&$ ost in!&"en%e

It is important to note that the Co#ncil, in the words o" the Ferman 8ederal Constit#tional Co#rt, is .the representati!e 'ody o" mas%ters o" the Treaties> correspondin ly, it is not constit#ted accordin to proportional representation, '#t accordin to the ima e o" the e7#ality o" states6& o The Lis'on Treaty decision in /Aer"F, 1 /!E 1IJO, KJ E#ne 1JJ:, at para& 120 /#t e7#ality o" states does not tell the whole story&

8& 5ayes)Renshaw4 In the small n#m'er o" cases in which "nani it. is the r"&e, in!&"en%e is share' e="a&&. a ong the Co"n%i& e -ers& Sin%e an. nationa& re#resentative %an -&o%2 agree ent, the interests o! a&& have to -e ta2en into a%%o"nt( Un'er MGV, n#m'ers matter, and those e -er govern ents with the &argest n" -er o! votes 3or -iggest #o#"&ations4 %o"&' -e e+#e%te' to wie&' the &argest a o"nt o! in!&"en%e( However, sa!eg"ar's ha!e 'een '#ilt into the system to ens"re that the s a&&er e -er states, wor2ing together, have as "%h %han%e as the &arger ones to e+ert in!&"en%e over the !ina& o"t%o e&

Indeed, the 'i @em'er States are "re7#ently o#t)!oted in the Co#ncil C&&& D In!&"en%e %an a&so -e e+erte' -. &arge an' s a&& e -er states a&i2e in ore in!or a& ,and less easily 7#anti"ia'le- wa.s, s#ch as 'y #"tting !orwar' %o #ro ise #ro#osa&s a%%e#ta-&e to a a9orit. o" the mem'er o!ernments, !or ing %oa&itions with li(e)minded states, and ma(in their point o" !iew (nown to the Commission, the presidency, and the Co#ncil Secretariat& The !or ation o! %oa&itions within the Co"n%i& is an intrinsi% #art o! the 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%ess "n'er MGV, in which 7#ali"ied ma$orities and 'loc(in minorities matter, i" only "or the p#rposes o" calc#latin which mem'er states need to 'e won o!er in order to achie!e a consens#s&

) Assistant )4 Feneral A""air Co#ncil) Coordinate the wor( "or co#ncil The expansion o" the E#ropean Union in territory, and in the scope o" its competences, has nat#rally led to an increased n#m'er o" specialiGed Co#ncil con"i #rations and "ra mentation o" its acti!ity& The Co#ncil is aided in its wor( 'y !ario#s 'odies "rom a'o!e and "rom 'elow& The 7enera& A!!airs Co"n%i& is res#onsi-&e !or %oor'inating the wor2 o! the Co"n%i& as a whole& It also acts as !ina& ar-iter when the other Co"n%i&s %annot agree on a &egis&ative #ro#osa&& I! the 7enera& A!!airs Co"n%i& !ai&s to 'rea( the deadloc(, the atter gets sent "# to the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& !or a #o&iti%a& 'e%ision&

) Assistant >4 C+RE?ER) "rom nation states Cli(e Ci!il Ser!antsD At the lower ,national- le!el, the Co#ncil consists o" the Co ittee o! Per anent Re#resentatives 3COREPER4, and aro"n' >A? %o ittees an' wor2ing gro"#s& Wor(in ro#ps wi&& 'is%"ss the te%hni%a&ities o! i #&e enting a &egis&ative #ro#osa& 3!ro the Co ission4 that nat"ra&&. arise in a "nion o! twent.6eight e -er states( Their wor( pa!es the way "or C+RE?ER, the most important committee, which %he%2s ever. #ro#osa& an' 'ea&s with atters "nreso&ve' in the wor2ing gro"#s& The senior nationa& o!!i%ia&s who %o #rise the Per anent Re#resentatives have a -assa'oria& ran2 and resi'e in Ir"sse&s&

The. #re#are an' %oor'inate the agen'a !or the Co"n%i&(

Agree ent a ong the Per anent Re#resentatives wi&& o!ten -e en'orse' -. the Co"n%i&( Alternati!ely, the areas o! 'isagree ent wi&& -e 2e#t as narrow as #ossi-&e -e!ore sen'ing the !i&e "# to the Co"n%i& !or 'e%ision& On&. high&. #o&iti%a& iss"es have to -e renegotiate' -. the nationa& inisters( 8or these reasons, COREPER is so eti es viewe' as the ost #ower!"& -o'. in the EU0s 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%ess& Sin%e it is the nationa& a"thorities that "&ti ate&. i #&e ent EU &aw, the early in!ol!ement o" high6%a&i-re nationa& o!!i%ia&s is 2e. to the s ooth a' inistration o! #o&i%.&

The Co"n%i&, there!ore, nee's to !a%i&itate e+e%"tive res#onsi-i&ities(

Trans#aren%. an' a%%o"nta-i&it. ) Acted in le islati!e capacity #sed to 'e 'ehind the door Cleast transparent in EUD The Co"n%i& eets a& ost ever. wee2 in or'er to a'o#t new &egis&ation, '#t #ntil the Lis'on Treaty came into "orce, it ha' re!"se' to eet #"-&i%&. whenever it a%te' in its &egis&ative capacity, nor wo#ld it ho&' #ress %on!eren%es or re&ease trans%ri#ts 3 in"tes4 o! its eetings& 8rom a citiGens3 perspecti!e, the Co#ncil3s 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%ess has -een 'es%ri-e' as /a se%retive an' s#e%ia&i1e' a!!air0& o Ro'ert Thomson The Co"n%i&0s wor2ing #arties have negotiate' a n" -er o! &aws -ehin' %&ose' 'oors, which were then si #&. r"--er6sta #e' -. the inisters(

The Co"n%i& is the &east trans#arent EU instit"tion and the extent to which ministers are responsi'le to their own ?arliament will 'e also 'e disc#ssed&

@ore transparent now in .le islation deli'eration3 This sit#ation is, howe!er, rad#ally chan in & In *ecem'er 1JJH, the Co#ncil decided to hold meetin s in p#'lic sho#ld the iss#es "all #nder the co)decision proced#re& This, it claims, has increased its openness 'y 1J per cent& CitiGens and $o#rnalists are now a'le to "ollow positions ta(en 'y the ministers in the Co#ncil& The Lis-on Treat. in%&"'es a trans#aren%. %&a"se in Art( )N TEU4 .The Co"n%i& sha&& eet in #"-&i% when it 'e&i-erates an' votes on a 'ra!t &egis&ative a%t(0 Ea%h eeting wi&& -e 'ivi'e' into two #arts, 'ea&ing se#arate&. with &egis&ative an' non6 &egis&ative a%tivities( On&. the !irst ha&! wi&& -e #"-&i%&

Under Art& 2,K- o" the Co#ncil3s R#les o" ?roced#re411 o The o#ening to the #"-&i% o! Co"n%i& eetings re&ating to the DLegis&ative 'e&i-erationsD #art o" its a enda shall 'e a'e thro"gh #"-&i% trans ission 'y a#dio!is#al means, nota'ly in an o!er"low room and thro# h 'roadcastin in all o""icial lan #a es o" the instit#tions o" the E#ropean Union #sin !ideo) streamin & o A recorded !ersion shall remain a!aila'le "or at least one month on the Co#ncil6s Internet site& The o#tcome o" !otin shall 'e indicated 'y !is#al means& The Co"n%i& %an -e %re'ite' !or having -e%o e a ore trans#arent instit"tion&

8or example, most doc#ments are now directly a!aila'le "rom its we'site ,http4IIwww&consili#m&e#&int-& And the Co#ncil Secretariat is wor(in on a data'ase containin all the !otin records in a #ser)"riendly "orm&

) Iss#e o" acco#nta'ility and standard o" le itimacy /#t the #ro-&e s o! a%%o"nta-i&it. are &in2e' to the str"%t"re o! the Co"n%i&, as we&& as to the stan'ar' o! &egiti a%. "se' to assess the Co#ncil&

) Co#ncil made o" ministers on national election there"ore they ha!e the indirect le itimacy Str#ct#rally, the Co"n%i& has e+e%"tive an' &egis&ative #owers, and is there"ore not capt#red 'y the traditional doctrine o" separation o" powers& The Co"n%i& a&so en9o.s #&enar. &egis&ative #ower within the E"ro#ean Union, and it is %o #ose' o! inisters who were e&e%te' in nationa& e&e%tions an' on nationa& iss"es( The Co"n%i& there!ore en9o.s in'ire%t &egiti a%.&

) National ?arliament #na'le to scr#tiniGe the new directi!es and re #lations, they are always res#lt o" ne otiated compromise "rom di""erent state mem'ers, and they ha!e to accept e!en rel#ctant to do so which has lon term e""ect Cr#cially, the Co#ncil as an instit#tion has permanent ten#re ,it cannot 'e !oted o#t o" o""ice 'y the E#ropean ?arliament- and it is not acco#nta'le to national parliaments& V( Iog'anorB The Co#ncil o" @inisters is !re="ent&. a%%"se' o! giving too "%h 'is%retion to the govern ents o! the Ge -er States and &i iting their a%%o"nta-i&it. to the #ar&ia ents an' voters o! the Ge -er States& @any critics 'elie!e that E"ro#ean a%tivities are given ins"!!i%ient s%r"tin. -. nationa& &egis&at"res and that #ar&ia ents 'o not have s"!!i%ient o##ort"nities to e+a ine new 'ire%tives an'

reg"&ations and i!e their opinion on them& De%isions in the E"ro#ean Union are o!ten the res"&t o! a negotiate' %o #ro ise -etween 'i!!erent #oints o! view e+#resse' -. the vario"s govern ents o" the @em'er States& In conse7#ence, nationa& &ines o! a%%o"nta-i&it. %an -e%o e -&"rre', and a national o!ernment can claim that it was o#t!oted SB or o#tmanoe#!red in /r#ssels, e!en when that is not the case& It is sometimes hi hly con!enient "or national o!ernments to 'lame 6/r#ssels6 "or re"orm, the ne%essit. o! whi%h the. the se&ves re%ognise -"t !or whi%h the. are re&"%tant to a%%e#t res#onsi-i&it.& Nationa& govern ents are th"s a-&e to e+#&oit the &a%2 o! a%%o"nta-i&it. !or their own short6ter #o&iti%a& ai s(

I"t this wor2s to the &ong6ter 'isa'vantage o! the #"-&i% stan'ing o! the E"ro#ean Union& ) La%2 o! trans#aren%. d#e to many wor(s done 'y ci!il ser!ant and anno#ncement only made #ntil ministers come into compromise a reement altho# h interested can ain the in"ormation and sometime in"l#ence the o#tcome Contin"eB @any ar #e also that "n%&arit. an' a &a%2 o! trans#aren%. %hara%terise the wor2ing o! the Co"n%il& Its 'a.6to6'a. a%tivities are %on'"%te' ain&. -. %ivi& servants, and its meetin s and decisions sometimes see to -e shro"'e' in se%re%. "nti& the anno"n%e ent o! the !ina& #o&iti%a& %o #ro ise -etween inisters which then "orms part o" E#ropean law& Th#s, compared to national le islat#res which de'ate in p#'lic and attract re #lar media attention,

&aw6 a2ing in the Co"n%i& 'oes not see to -e %hara%terise' -. a #"-&i% e+%hange o! views an' it attra%ts &itt&e e'ia %overage& I"t the actions o" the Co#ncil may not, in reality, 'e as opa7#e as is sometimes claimed, and a9or intereste' #arties in Ir"sse&s an' Stras-o"rg have gaine' a%%ess to #a#ers an' in!or ation whi%h ena-&es the to !o&&ow an' so eti es in!&"en%e the %o"rse o! #rivate 'e-ate within the Co"n%i&& Ne!ertheless, the #er%e#tion o! the Co"n%i& as ina%%essi-&e an' se%retive is an "n'o"-te' -arrier to the %on!i'en%e which E#ropean electors o# ht to ha!e in the Union6s le islati!e system&

) Co#ncil and EU parliament can hardly 'e the "irst and second cham'er as EU instit#tion is not state)'ased model o" o!t and lac( o" acco#nta'ility since sometime can 'ypass the EU parliament In terms o" assessin the Co#ncil, it is te #ting to %on%eive the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent an' Co"n%i& as the !irst an' se%on' %ha -er o" a E#ropean le islat#re, -"t s"%h an ana&og. is a&so !ra"ght with 'i!!i%"&t.& o 8irst, it wo#ld 'e an arti!i%ia& atte #t to shoehorn the e!ol!in E#ropean instit"tions into a state6-ase' o'e& o! govern ent& o Second, it does not address the #ro-&e s o! a%%o"nta-i&it.( There are vario"s wa.s in whi%h the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent %an -e -.#asse' in the na e o! intergovern enta& %oo#eration&

As a res#lt, the 'e o%rati%a&&. e&e%te' -o'. 3the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent4 is not a-&e to ho&' the e+e%"tive 'e%isionL a2er 3the Co"n%i&4 #ro#er&. to a%%o"nt( This acco#nta'ility ap, or .democracy de"icit3, will

%4 THE COGGISSION Commission) exercised the EU exec#ti!e, ali(e the Ci!il ser!ice which is not elected E!ery political system needs an instit#tion that sets the policy a enda, and o""ers #idance and leadership& We ha!e already seen that the E#ropean Co#ncil "#l"ils that role& The other instit"tion o! the E"ro#ean Union that e+er%ises e+e%"tive #ower is the Co ission( The Co ission is o!ten "n'erstoo' as the %ivi& servi%e o! the E"ro#ean Union& The ci!il ser!ice in most states, or state)li(e entities, is a part o" p#'lic administration that is "ormally non) political& In that context, the Co ission ho"ses the Dire%torates67enera&

3D7s4Ca #er anent -"rea"%ra%. that anages the a' inistrative an' #o&i%. a!!airs o" the E#ropean Union& The Commission is also assisted 'y national a encies, which are responsi'le "or the day)to)day implementation o" administrati!e tas(s& I"t more importantly, the Co&&ege o! Co issioners is a&so a so"r%e o! 3E"ro#ean4 #o&iti%a& #ower an' 'ire%tion& The Co issioners are not e&e%te', however, andat least "ormallyare in'e#en'ent o! the e -er states who the. re#resent&

S#pranational nat#re) independent o" national o!t, and promote common interest o" EU as a whole The two)sided nat#re o" the Commission ma(es it ar #a'ly .the stran est administration e!er created&6 The Commission is a s"#ranationa& instit"tionCthat is, it is in'e#en'ent o! nationa& govern ents& It is, accordin to its Secretary Feneral, .the on&. organi1ation that is #ai' to thin2 E"ro#ean(0 As s#ch, it sa!eg"ar's an' #ro otes the %o on interest o! the E"ro#ean Union as a whole&

Initiate and dra"t le islation and implement the decisions ta(en 'y Co#ncil and ?arliament It is the e+e%"tive -ran%h o" the EU that isat least in theory res#onsi-&e !or initiating an' 'ra!ting &egis&ation, as well as "or i #&e enting the 'e%isions ta2en -. the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union an' Par&ia ent #nder the co)decision proced#re, and "or ens"ring that e -er states %o #&. with the &aw(

Commission is expensi!e '#rea#cracy and relati!e small siGe, relied on le islati!e proposal and detailed implementation o" EU law on mem'er states The Co ission is so eti es #ortra.e' in the e'ia as a 'istant, over-earing, an' e+#ensive -"rea"%ra%.& In "act, in 1JJ:)0J, the United Lin dom3s payments to EU insti%t#tions amo#nted to TK&O'n and its contri'#tion to the EU3s '#d et to T;&2'n ,these are typical "i #res- which amo#nts to J&O per cent and J&: per cent respecti!ely o" a '#d et o" T;:<'n "or the same year& ,The United Lin dom3s 1J00)01 contri'#tion is "orecast to rise to T2&2 ,or 0&K per cent- and O&2'n ,or 0&; per cent o" the UL '#d et- respecti!ely d#e to planned increases in the EU /#d et&- The E#ropean Union has an a reed '#d et "or the period 1JJ2)0K o"U:2<'n, which is e7#al to 0&01 per cent o" the ross national income ,FNI- o" the mem'er states& The si1e o! the Co ission 3*?,??? %ivi& servants4 is ro"gh&.

e="a& to the n" -er o! sta!! e #&o.e' -. a &arge %it. %o"n%i& in E#rope, and the tota& sta!! in a&& EU instit"tions, -o'ies an' agen%ies a&& over the wor&' is AA,???( The re&ative&. s a&& si1e o! the Co ission means that it re&ies !or &egis&ative #ro#osa&s on the Co"n%i& or the e -er states ,approximately OJ per cent o" proposals stem "rom the Co#ncil or the mem'er states- an' !or the 'etai&e' i #&e entation o! EU &aw on the e -er states(

Appointed e!ery H years The Co ission is a##ointe' ever. !ive .ears, within si+ onths o! the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent e&e%tions& The Commission3s c#rrent term o" o""ice will r#n #ntil K0 +cto'er 1J0;& /+R O&H RECENT C+@@ISSI+NERS 8R+@ T5E UNITE* rR5F/P@ o /aroness ,Catherine- Ashton o" Upholland ,1JJO)present-, "ormer Leader o" the 5o#se o" Lords o ?eter ,now Lord- @andelson ,1JJ;)Jcto'er 1JJO-, "ormerly @inister "or Trade and Ind#stry, and then Secretary o" State "or Northern Ireland in Tony /lairs Ca'inet o Neil Linnoc( ,0::H)1JJ;-, "ormerly leader o" the La'o#r ?arty o Chris ,now Lord- ?atten ,1JJJ)J;-, "ormerly Fo!ernor o" 5on Lon and a minister in @ar aret Thatcher and Eohn @a$ors Ca'inets

o Leon ,now Lord- /rittan PC ,0:O:) ::-, "ormerly a minister in @ar aret Thatchers Ca'inet

How 'oes the Co e+er%ise #ower$

ission

The Co issions res#onsi-i&ities an' #owers are -oth !or a&&. #res%ri-e', and ha!e e!ol!ed ,in"ormally- thro"gh a ne%essit. to res#on' to the re="ire ents o! the E"ro#ean Union(

) Wor( o" Commission Arti%&e )< TEU The Co ission sha&& #ro ote the genera& interest o! the Union an' ta2e a##ro#riate initiatives to that en'( o It shall ens"re the a##&i%ation o! the Treaties, and o" meas#res adopted 'y the instit#tions p#rs#ant to them& o It shall oversee the a##&i%ation o! Union &aw "n'er the %ontro& o! the Co"rt o! :"sti%e o! the E"ro#ean Union& o It shall e+e%"te the -"'get an' anage #rogra es& o It sha&& e+er%ise %oor'inating, e+e%"tive an' anage ent !"n%tions, as laid down in the Treaties& o With the e+%e#tion o! the %o on !oreign an' se%"rit. #o&i%., and other cases pro!ided "or in the Treaties, it sha&&

ens"re the UnionDs e+terna& re#resentation& o It sha&& initiate the UnionDs ann"a& an' "&tiann"a& #rogra ing with a !iew to achie!in interinstit#tional a reements& Union &egis&ative a%ts a. on&. -e a'o#te' on the -asis o! a Co ission #ro#osa&, except where the Treaties pro!ide otherwise& +ther acts shall 'e adopted on the 'asis o" a Commission proposal where the Treaties so pro!ide&

) Appointment standard) competence and independence Arti%&e )< TEU The Commission6s term o" o""ice shall 'e "i!e years& o The e -ers o! the Co ission sha&& -e %hosen on the gro"n' o! their genera& %o #eten%e an' E"ro#ean %o it ent !ro #ersons whose in'e#en'en%e is -e.on' 'o"-t( o In carryin o#t its responsi'ilities, the Commission shall 'e %o #&ete&. in'e#en'ent&

o Witho#t pre$#dice to Article 0O,1-, the e -ers o! the Co ission sha&& neither see2 nor ta2e instr"%tions !ro an. 7overn ent or other instit"tion, -o'., o!!i%e or entit.( o They shall re"rain "rom any action incompati'le with their d#ties or the per"ormance o" their tas(s&

The Commission appointed 'etween the date o" entry into "orce o" the Treaty o" Lis'on and K0 +cto'er 1J0;, shall consist o" one national o" each @em'er State, incl#din its ?resident and the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy who shall 'e one o" its Aice) ?residents& As "rom 0 No!em'er 1J0;, the Commission shall consist o" a n#m'er o" mem'ers, incl#din its ?resident and the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy, correspondin to two)thirds o" the n#m'er o" @em'er States, #nless the E#ropean Co#ncil, actin #nanimo#sly, decides to alter this n#m'er&

The e -ers o! the Co ission sha&& -e %hosen !ro a ong the nationa&s o! the Ge -er States on the 'asis o" a system o" stri%t&. e="a& rotation -etween the Ge -er States, re"lectin the demo raphic and eo raphical ran e o" all the @em'er States& This system shall 'e esta'lished #nanimo#sly 'y the E#ropean Co#ncil in accordance with Article 1;; o" the Treaty on the 8#nctionin o" the E#ropean Union&

) ?resident wor( Arti%&e )< TEU The ?resident o" the Commission shall4 o &a. 'own g"i'e&ines within which the Commission is to wor(> o 'e%i'e on the interna& organisation o" the Commission, ens"ring that it a%ts %onsistent&., e!!i%ient&. and as a colle iate 'ody> o a##oint Vi%e6Presi'ents, other than the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy, "rom amon the mem'ers o" the Commission&

A e -er o! the Co ission sha&& resign i! the Presi'ent so re="ests& o The 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy shall resi n, in accord%ance with the proced#re set o#t in Article 0O,0-, i" the ?resident so re7#ests&

) Appointment o" ?resident) elected 'y EU ?arliament i" no ma$ority, E& Co#ncil decide 'y 7#ali"ied ma$ority Arti%&e )< TEU Ta(in into acco#nt the elections to the E#ropean ?arliament and a"ter ha!in held the appropriate cons#ltations, the E#ropean Co#ncil, actin 'y a 7#ali"ied ma$ority, shall propose to the E#ropean ?arliament a candidate "or ?resident o" the Commission& o This %an'i'ate sha&& -e e&e%te' -. the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent -. a a9orit. o" its component mem'ers& o I! he 'oes not o-tain the re="ire' a9orit., the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, a%ting -. a ="a&i!ie' a9orit., sha&& within one onth #ro#ose a new %an'i'ate who sha&& -e e&e%te' -. the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent !o&&owing the sa e #ro%e'"re

6 Appointment o" commission 'ased on consent o" EU ?arliament and appointed 'y EU Co#ncil The Co"n%i&, -. %o on a%%or' with the Presi'ent6e&e%t, shall adopt the list o" the other persons whom it #ro#oses !or a##oint ent as mem'ers o" the Commission& They sha&& -e se&e%te', on the -asis o! the s"ggestions a'e -. Ge -er States, in accordance with the criteria set o#t in para raph K, second s#'para raph, and para raph H, second s#'para raph& The ?resident, the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy and the other mem'ers o" the Commission shall 'e s"-9e%t as a -o'. to a vote o! %onsent -. the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent& On the -asis o! this %onsent, the Commission shall 'e a##ointe' -. the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&, a%ting -. a ="a&i!ie' a9orit.(

) EU parliament can !ote on motion o" cens#re and Commission ha!e to resi n as a 'ody The Commission, as a 'ody, shall 'e responsi'le to the E#ropean ?arliament& In accordance with Article 1K; o" the Treaty on the 8#nctionin o" the E#ropean Union, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent a. vote on a otion o! %ens"re o! the Co ission& I" s#ch a motion is carried, the e -ers o! the Co ission sha&& resign as a -o'. and the 5i h Representati!e o" the Union "or 8orei n A""airs and Sec#rity ?olicy shall resi n "rom the d#ties that he carries o#t in the Commission&

Commission desi ned as depoliticiGed and is a technocratic approach which initially pop#lar consent is not needed The Co ission was initia&&. 'esigne' as a 'e#o&iti%i1e' !"n%tiona&ist -"rea"%ra%., the tas( o" which was to a'van%e the %o on interests o! E"ro#e0s %iti1ens& Its mem'ers were to a%t in'e#en'ent&. o! nationa& govern ents an' were not a%%o"nta-&e to the e -er states& We ha!e already seen that Eean @onnet, the chie" architect o" the "orer#nner o" the Common @ar(et, en'orse' a te%hno%rati% a##roa%h an' the i'ea o! e&ite6&e' gra'"a&is , where'y a%tion was to -e initiate' -. e+#erts rather than -. e&e%te' #o&iti%ians& The "irst tas( was to sec#re the economic 'asis> then, pro!ided that the "r#its o" E#ropean inte ration were 'ene"icial, it was tho"ght that #o#"&ar %onsent wo"&' 'eve&o#

as a %onse="en%e o! those !"n%tiona& agree ents& Interestin ly, #o#"&ar %onsent was initia&&. not seen as a re="ire ent o! the !"n%tiona& organi1ation o! E"ro#e&

S" ar. !"n%tions o! %o ission) initiate le islation, mediator 'tw states and EU, #ardian o" EU 'y ens#re treaty is applied As the process o" E#ropean inte ration has ta(en shapewith more national competences 'ein trans"erred to the E#ropean le!elso the #owers o! the Co ission have grown& It now has a say in a& ost ever. !"n%tion o! EU governan%e( The "ollowin i!e only a sample o" the Commissions m#ltiple identities& o Agen'a settingThe Commissions principal power has always 'een the e+%&"sive right o! initiative in the &aw6 a2ing #ro%ess& The E"ro#ean Co"n%i& an' the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent a. re="est the Commission to s#'mit proposals, '"t the "&ti ate 'e%ision is the Co issions own4 Arts 1;0 and 11H T8EU&

o /Honest -ro2er an' e'iatorThe Commission acts in the /genera& interest o! the UnionB Art& 02,0- TEU& It increasin ly #ses its #o&iti%a& ne"tra&it. an' in'e#en'en%e as a anager ,rather than initiator- o" policies that are made 'y other instit#tions& As a 'ro(er and mediator, the Co ission a%ts as a go6 -etween !or the e -er states an' other EU instit"tions& To ill#strate, when, 'etween 1J0J and 1J01, the e#ro)area @em'er States and the International @onetary 8#nd a reed to pro!ide "inancial s#pport to Freece in the context o" the deterioration o" its "inancin conditions, the E#ropean Commission was entr#sted with the coordination and administration o" the pooled 'ilateral loans and the dis'#rsement to Freece&

o Voi%e o! %o on interestThe Commission acts as the g"ar'ian o! EU &aw -. ens"ring that the Treaties are a##&ie' -. the other instit"tions4 Art& 02,0TEU& I" necessary, it wi&& 'o so -. -ringing an a%tion in the EC: !or !ai&"re to a%t4 Arts 1<K and 1<H T8EU&

Commissions3 in"l#ence Cnot powerD V deli!er opinions which can in"l#ence policy de'ates The Commission has in"l#ence ,rather than power- in two (ey areas4 it a. 'e&iver o#inions on an. EU atter and it m#st #"-&ish an ann"a& re#ort on the acti!ities o" the E#ropean Union& It %an in!&"en%e #o&i%. 'e-ates an' g"i'e the E"ro#ean Union

Not clear whether Commission per"orm 'est in ?ower side or in"l#ence side /#t it is %"rrent&. not %&ear whi%h o! its !"n%tions the Co ission #er!or s -est( :( Peterson, The Colle e o" Commissioners2, in E& ?eterson and @& Shac(leton ,eds- The Instit#tions o" the E#ropean Union, Krd edn ,1J01, +x"ord4 JU?-, ch& H, pp& 00:)01J Any analysis o" the Commission m#st consider the normati!e 7#estion o" what (ind o" or an)iGation the Colle e sho#ld 'e& A policy entreprene#rW An honest 'ro(erW A mana er o" deci) sions ta(en 'y othersW +r an 6en ine o" inte ration6W C&&& D In an enlar ed EU, the Commission may 'e e!en 'etter placed than in the past to act as a tr#ly honest 'ro(er& It may rarely exercise control o!er new cooperati!e networ(s or reclaim its old "#nction as an en ine o" inte ration, '#t it will lo ically remain at the centre o" many EU policy networ(s& In any e!ent, it will o"ten "ind itsel" in a #ni7#e position to steer de'ates in ways that ser!e collecti!e E#ropean interests, as

di""ic#lt as they may 'e to identi"y clearly in the new EU&

Two views on Co issions which is a ents o" mem'er states Cdoes not determine the EU directionsD and a#tonomo#s actor o" EU Cpro!ide policy leadershipD To what e+tent %an the Co ission a%t"a&&. 'eter the 'ire%tion in whi%h the E"ro#ean Union oves$ ine

This 7#estion has 'een s#'$ect to considera'le academic de'ate& As we will see in Chapter 01, s#ccessi!e increases in the E#ropean ?arliament3s power ha!e 'een at the expense o" the Commissions power& *oes the Commission "ace extinction as an independ%ent political 'odyW

S( Ia%he et( a&(B ) The Commission as an A ent o" the @em'er States) help member states to reach compromise by ma#ing a fair decision The intergovern enta&ist view o" the Co ission is that it is on&. an agent o! the e -er states& Its "#nction is to a2e it easier !or govern ents to !in' agree ent on the 'etai&s o! %oo#eration with ea%h other& Where there is a reement on the 'road a enda "or co)operation, it is %onvenient !or e -er states to 'e&egate so e %ontro& over the 'etai&e' agen'a to the Co ission& The. see it as a re&ia-&e so"r%e o! in'e#en'ent #ro#osa&s -e%a"se it has te%hni%a& in!or ation, an' is a ne"tra& ar-iter 'etween con"lictin national interests&

De&egating the a2ing o! #ro#osa&s to the Co ission in this way re'"%es the %osts o" co) operation -. re'"%ing the ris2 that D'e%isions wi&& -e 'e&a.e' -. an in%on%&"sive str"gg&e a ong %o #eting #ro#osa&s, or that the !ina& 'e%ision wi&& -e gross&. "n!airD& Where there are alternati!e proposals that mi ht win ma$ority s#pport, the %hoi%e is o!ten 'e%i'e' -. whi%h #ro#osa& is -a%2e' -. the Co ission& Altho# h this dele ation o" the ri ht to ma(e detailed proposals i!es the Commission a certain "ormal power to set the a enda, in the inter o!ernmentalist !iew the Co ission 'oes not 'eter ine the 'ire%tion in whi%h the EU oves( It is on&. he&#ing the e -er states to agree on the 'etai&s o! what the. have 'e%i'e' that the. want to 'o an.wa.( E(((F

) The Commission as an A#tonomo#s Actor) have the right to initiate legislative process without waiting for member states$ proposals The a&ternative to the view that the Co ission is no ore than an agent o" the @em'er States is that it %an an' 'oes a%t a"tono o"s&. to #rovi'e #o&i%. &ea'ershi# to the EU& *e"enders o" this !iew point to 2e. reso"r%es that a&&ow it to 'o soB o its so&e right o! initiative in the &egis&ative #ro%ess o! the EC> o its a-i&it. to &o%ate a&&ies a ong in!&"entia& interest gro"#s> and o its #owers "n'er the %o #etition %&a"ses o! the Treaties to a%t against ono#o&ies& The Co ission 'oes not have to wait #assive&. !or the Ge -er

States to as2 it to -ring !orwar' #ro#osa&s&

It can i'enti!. a #ro-&e that has a&rea'. starte' to %on%ern govern ents, and #ro#ose a E"ro#ean so&"tion( It can #se its so&e right o! initiative to #a%2age iss"es in the !or &east &i2e&. to engen'er o##osition in the Co"n%i& o! Ginisters or the E?& Where there is opposition "rom mem'er states to the "#ll)'lown de!elopment o" a policy, the Co ission a. #ro#ose instea' a &i ite' s a&&6s%a&e #rogra e> where there is resistance to a directi!e or re #lation, the Co ission a. #ro#ose a &ess threatening re%o en'ation or O#inion& In each case, the &i ite' ste# esta'lishes a precedent "or action in the policy sector and %an -e !o&&owe' "# &ater with !"rther ste#s i! an' when the environ ent in the Co"n%i& o! Ginisters is ore %on'"%ive(

Di!!erent with nationa& e+e%"tiveB Se!eral exec#ti!e powers ma(e the line 'tw political and administrati!e 'l#rred In some ways, the exec#ti!e r#le) ma(in power o" the Commission can 'e compared to the exec#ti!e powers o" a o!ernment& 8or example, the Commission has the sole power to initiate policy and le islation #nder Art& 02,1- TEU, which is a power reminiscent o" the UL o!ernments near)monopoly on policyma(in & The Commission a&so has severa& e+e%"tive res#onsi-i&ities that -&"r the 'istin%tion -etween #o&iti%a& an' a' inistrative #owers(

The Commission consists o"4 o a %ore e+e%"tive ,the Colle e o" Commissioners-, with #o&iti%a& res#onsi-i&ities ,proposin policies, initiatin le islation, ar'itration, and ne otiatin international trade and cooperation a reements-> o a -"rea"%ra%. ,the *Fs-, which is res#onsi-&e !or &egis&ative 'ra!ting, a' inistrative wor2 ,s#ch as mana in the '#d et o" U:2<'n "or the period 1JJ2)0K and r#nnin its Str#ct#ral 8#nds, the main p#rpose o" which is to e!en o#t economic disparities 'etween the richer and poorer parts o" the Union-, and the re #lation o" competition, a ric#lt#re, and trade policy> and o a networ2 o! %o ittees an' agen%ies that s%r"tini1e, monitor, and re #late the i #&e entation o! #ri ar. an' se%on'ar. EU &aw(

Di!!erent with nationa& e+e%"tiveB No power to tax and spend and to coercion as EU has no police "orce The e+e%"tive #owers o! the Co ission are a&so 'i!!erent "rom those o" a national o!ernment& In that sense, the Co ission ight -e viewe' as a new t.#e o! Dreg"&ator. agen%.D& Altho# h the Commission is e7#ipped with r#le)ma(in , policyma(in , and other exec#ti!e powers, it 'oes not have the sa e #ower to ta+ an' s#en' as 'o nationa& govern ents, nor 'oes it have #owers o! %oer%ion ,the E"ro#ean Union has no #o&i%e !or%e or its own i&itar.-& In the words o" a "ormer ECE $#d e, 6the Comm#nity is only a'le to exist as a Comm#nity o" law& o It has no weapons or armies, it is held to ether 'y the a#thority o" law6W

Di!!erent with nationa& e+e%"tiveB No need acco#nta'le to ?arliament or the electorate The 'i!!eren%es -etween the Co ission an' nationa& govern ents ha!e important i #&i%ations !or a%%o"nta-i&it.4 in the eyes o" the Ferman 8ederal Constit#tional Co#rt, the Commission Dnee' not e+tensive&. !"&!i& the %on'itions o! a govern ent that is !"&&. a%%o"nta-&e either to Par&ia ent or to the a9orit. 'e%ision o! the e&e%torate 'eca#se the Co ission itse&! is not o-&ige' to the wi&& o! the e&e%torate in a %o #ara-&e anner(

Di!!erent with nationa& e+e%"tiveB Commission has the power in re #latory policies '#t not in non) re #larity policies Cas this part need to depend on mem'er statesD A "#rther ill#stration also hi hli hts the dissimilarity& Whereas the Co ission has %o #eten%e over %ertain Dreg"&ator. #o&i%iesD ,"or example, %o #etition, agri%"&t"re, tra'e-, it 'oes not have %o #eten%e over Dnon6reg"&ator. #o&i%iesD ,"or example, in%o e re'istri-"tion-& This is '"e to its !inan%ia& 'e#en'en%e on the e -er states( We saw earlier that the EUDs -"'get an' &eve&s o! sta!! are s a&& even when %o #are' to the -"'gets o! e'i" 6si1e' "ni%i#a& %o"n%i&s in the United Lin dom& @oreo!er, #nli(e a state, the E"ro#ean Union has no in'e#en'ent ta+6raising #ower&

As a res#lt o" these '#d etary restrictions and in sharp contrast with national o!ernments, the Co ission is ain&. engage' with reg"&ator. a%tivit. rather than with non6reg"&ator. a%tivit.( C& 5arlow, Acco#nta'ility in the E#ropean Union X1JJ1, +x"ord4 +U?-, pp& <1)K /eca#se it is not in the '#siness o" ser!ice deli!ery nor, except in certain limited areas s#ch as competition policy, o" 6direct administration6, most o" the Commission6s ener ies are de!oted to policy)ma(in and re #lation, a sharp contrast with 'oth national and re ional administrations& The Commission does not, in New ?#'lic @ana ement ,N?@- $ar on, ha!e a direct relationship with 6c#stomers6 to hear their reactions, A ain atypically, the EU admin) istration is not cond#cted thro# h exec#ti!e a encies C&&& D The Commission is conse7#ently hea!ily dependent on the administrations o" @em'er States and their re ions in respect o" ser!ice deli!ery and en"orcement C&&& D To paraphrase the "amo#s aphorism o" +s'orne and

Fae'ler, the Commission is a 'ody which 6steers6 and does not 6row6&

What are the &ega& an' instit"tiona& restraints on that #ower$ ) Commission3s str#ct#re is di""erent, they are appointed 'ased on competence and independence nat#re, and one co#ntry one commission Under the .Westminster model3 o" exec#ti!e power ,at which we loo(ed in Chapter 0 and Chapter 2-, the UL o!ernment consists o" the party ,or parties- a'le to command a ma$ority in ?arliament& The ministers are a""iliated to one party ,or to a coalition o" parties- and are led 'y the ?rime @inister& This system o" exec#ti!e power is eared towards two character%istics4 a shared political a enda and hierarchical or aniGation& The %"rrent Co ission is str"%t"re' ver. 'i!!erent&.& Ever. e -er state 3o! whi%h there are twent.6eight4 is %"rrent&. re#resente' -. one Co issioner(

The Co issioners are not se&e%te' in or'er to ens"re %oheren%e o! #o&iti%a& i'eas and 'elie"s within the Commission> rather, the. are %hosen /on the gro"n' o! their genera& %o #eten%e an' E"ro#ean %o it ent !ro #ersons whose in'e#en'en%e is -e.on' 'o"-t ,Art& 02,K- TEU-& They are also representati!es o" their co#ntry 'ased on the si #&e #rin%i#&e o!/one %o"ntr., one Co issioner0( The Treaty o" Lis'on was s#pposed to pro!ide "or a red#ction in the n#m'er o" Commissioners "rom 1J0; and their selection on the 'asis o" an e7#al rotation system& 5owe!er, a"ter the Irish !oters re$ected the Lis'on Treaty in a re"erend#m, the Irish o!%ernment ens#red additional le al #arantees and ass#rances "rom the heads o" state and o!ernment& 8rench ?resident Nicolas Sar(oGy con"irmed that, #nder the new deal, .e!ery mem'er state will ha!e a commissionerwhich represents a si ni"icant concession to

Ireland ,as well as to small states enerally, which were #nhappy with the red#ction-& This will re7#ire some "orm o" Treaty at some point in the "#t#re& The E#ropean Co#ncil needs to act #nanimo#sly to alter the composition o" the Commission&

) ?resident can dismiss commission with appro!al o" other commissioners The Commission has some "eat#res o" the Westminster system in relation to its interna& str"%t"re& The Commission wor2s /"n'er the #o&iti%a& g"i'an%e o! its Presi'ent0, who 'e%i'es on its interna& organi1ation an' on the a&&o%ation o! res#onsi-i&ities o! the Co issioners& Its Presi'ent %an 3with the a##rova& o! the other Co issioners4 'is iss a Co issioner& Interna&&. at &east, the !"n%tions o! the Presi'ent are si i&ar to the !"n%tion o! the U5 Pri e Ginister as the hea' o! govern ent(

6 E co#ncil and EU ?arliament has the role in appoint '#t not the role to dismiss except in extreme rare, EU parliament can !ote on motion o" cens#re to dismiss co#ncil as a 'ody /#t in contrast to the Westminster model ,in which the o!ernment is elected independently 'y ?arliament-, the Co ission is a##ointe' -. the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& 3whi%h no inates the Presi'ent an' the Co issioners4 an' -. the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent 3whi%h has to %on!ir the no inations4in other words, 'y a #nitary and a "ederal 'ody actin in tandem & The E"ro#ean Co"n%i& has, however, no #ower to 'is iss the Co ission& The E"ro#ean Par&ia ent is e #owere', in an e+tre e %ase, to retire the Co ission -. otion o! %ens"re and with a two6 thir's a9orit.(

S"%h a a9orit. is 'i!!i%"&t to organi1e at the -est o! ti esC an' nigh on i #ossi-&e, i!en the di!ersity o" parties in the E#ropean ?arliament& +n a smaller scale, in 1JJ;, the threat o" a no3 !ote led Italy to withdraw Rocco /#tti lione, opposed 'y mem'ers o" the E#ropean ?arliament ,@E?s- "or his conser!ati!e !iews on homosex#ality> in Ean#ary 1J0J, it led /#l aria3s R#miana Eele!a to withdraw her candidacy, "ollowin alle ations that the declaration o" her "inancial interests did not con%"orm to the Code o" Cond#ct "or mem'ers o" the E#ropean Commission&

) EU parliament scr#tiny the Commission report 'y committee +n a more re #lar 'asis, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent is %on!ronte' with a -ewi&'ering arra. o! re#orts, 'e-ates, an' ="estions that are 'esigne' to ho&' the e+e%"tiveC#arti%"&ar&. the Co issionCto a%%o"nt& It e+er%ises onitoring #owers -. s%r"tini1ing Co ission re#orts that are reg"&ar&. s"- itte'"or example, the Ann#al Commission Report on the 8#nctionin o" the Comm#nities and the Ann#al Report on the Implementation o" the /#d et& The E"ro#ean Par&ia ent has twent. #o&i%.6s#e%i!i% %o ittees in whi%h its 'etai&e' wor2 is %arrie' o"t( Li(e the select committees in the 5o#se o" Commons and 5o#se o" Lords, the E#ropean ?arliament committees re"lect the political composition o" the E#ropean ?arliament, the. en9o. a high &eve&

o! a"tono ., an' eetings have, sin%e );;;, -een he&' in #"-&i%( Co ittees s%r"tini1e a&& &egis&ative #ro#osa&s -e!ore ret"rning the to the #&enar. !or a vote(

) E#ropean +m'#dsmen recei!e complain "rom EU citiGens and send reports to EU ?arliament Under Arts 1; T8EU and 11O T8EU, the E"ro#ean O -"'s an ,who is elected 'y ?arliament- is e #owere' to re%eive %o #&aints !ro an. %iti1en o" the Union %on%erning instan%es o! a&a' inistration in the acti!ities o" the Union instit#tions& The O -"'s an s"- its an ann"a& re#ort to the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent on the o"t%o e o! her in="iries&

) ?arliament 'y Comitolo y decision can s#spect whether comitolo y committee act in #ltra !ires in meas#res adopted #nder co)decision Cdisc#ssed detailed in later chapterD 8inally, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent has %onsistent&. #resse' !or s%r"tin. rights e="iva&ent to those o" the Co#ncil o!er the implementin 'odies(nown as %o ito&og. %o ittees0 that are chaired 'y the Commission and which 'rin to ether representati!es o" all o" the mem'er states& A"ter the introd#ction o" the co) decision le islati!e proced#re, new %o ito&og. De%isions Eoversees the a%ts i #&e ente' -. the E"ro#ean Co issionF were intro'"%e' in 0::: and 1JJ<& As a res#lt, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent now re%eives ore in!or ation an' has the right to re="est re6e+a ination o! eas"res a'o#te' "n'er %o6 'e%ision i! the %o ittee was s"s#e%te' o! a%ting "&tra vires& ,8or more on comi%tolo y, see Chapter 01&-

?L N# ent, The Fo!ernment and ?olitics o" the E#ropean Union ,1J0J, /asin sto(e4 @acmillan-, p& 0KJ &&& comitolo y committees can 'e seen as a means 'y which the o!ernments o" the mem%'er states, and to a lesser extent the E?, see( to ens#re the Commission does not 'ecome too independent o" them& In concept#al terms, the committees are one o" a n#m'er o" mechanisms and de!ices "o#nd thro# ho#t the EU system #sed 'y the EU6s principals mainly the national o!ernments, '#t increasin ly also the E?to maintain control o!er their a ents, especially the Commission, where control is desired& This is achie!ed in a n#m'er o" ways& 8or example, altho# h some o" the committees do exercise important powers, "or the most part they tend to wor( within "airly narrowly de"ined limits& Anythin !ery contro!ersial can 'e re"erred to a Co#ncil meetin , and increasin ly also the E?& There is also the "act that the Co#ncil, and a ain increasin ly the E?, are $ealo#s o" their powers and wo#ld mo!e 7#ic(ly a ainst the Commission i" it was tho# ht comitolo y committees were 'ein #sed to #ndermine those powers& And then there is the (ey point that the

Co#ncil and E? (now that it is $#st not in the Commission6s lon )term interests to a'#se its powers 'y "orcin #nwel%come or #npop#lar meas#res thro# h a committee& The Commission wants and needs the cooperation o" the Co#ncil and E?&

'4 CASE STUD8B THE RESI7NATION OF THE COGGISSION IN );;; Unaccepta'le incidence o" error in operational expendit#re payments The E#ropean Commission resi ned as a 'ody on 0H @arch 0::: "ollowin the p#'lication o" a report 'y a Committee o" Independent Experts entitled Alle ations Re ardin 8ra#d, @ismana ement and Nepotism in the E#ropean Union& Concern o!er the Commission3s mana ement o" the EU '#d et had 'een rowin "or se!eral years& 8rom 0::; to 0::<, "or example, 'etween ; per cent and H per cent o" the EU3s '#d et co#ld not 'e acco#nted "or& The E#ropean Co#rt A#ditors ,ECAconcl#ded that there ha' -een an "na%%e#ta-&e in%i'en%e o! error in o#erationa& e+#en'it"re #a. ents ,OH per cent o" which had ta(en place in the mem'er states-& Stories o" "ra#d and waste went thro# h all o" the E#ropean media and the p#'lic o#tcry was enormo#s& As a res#lt o" the ECA3s ann#al report, the E#ropean ?arliament, in 0:::,

re"#sed to .dischar e3 ,that is, appro!e- the '#d et& To top it all, a Commission employee, ?a#l !an /#itenen, 'lew the whistle on the Commission 'y passin to the E#ropean ?arliament and ECA a dossier in which he detailed e""orts 'y senior Commission o""icials to s#ppress in!esti ations into "ra#d> he also made other alle ations o" mismana ement and nepotism& The ost !a o"s e+a #&e %on%erne' Co issioner E'ith Cresson, who e #&o.e' her #ersona& 'entist an' %&ose !rien' as a high&. #ai' s%ienti!i% a'viser on HIVPAi'sCa #osition !or whi%h he was "ns"ite' an' "n="a&i!ie'( Using Art( >*@ TFEU, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent ight have -een a-&e to sa%2 the Co ission %o&&e%tive&. in :an"ar. );;K& The two main political ro#ps in the E#ropean ?arliamentthe Socialist ?arty and the E#ropean ?eople3s ?artywere, howe!er, #na'le to mana e the crisis and a ree on a s#ccess"#l !ote o" cens#re&

The. 'i' esta-&ish the Co ittee o! In'e#en'ent E+#erts to investigate the a&&egations( A"ter two months, the Committee deli!ered its hi hly critical report on 0H @arch 0:::, drawin the "ollowin concl#sion& E#ropean Committee o" Independent Experts, 8irst Report on Alle ations Re ardin 8ra#d, @ismana ement and Nepotism in the E#ropean Commission, 0H @arch 0:::, para& 0&<&1 CTheD reprehensi'le cond#ct o" the Commission as a 'ody, or o" Commissioners indi!id#ally, and more partic#larly C&&& D mismana ement in detectin or dealin with "ra#d, mismana e)ment or nepotism perpetrated 'y the administrati!e ser!ices o" the Commission and 'y third parties wor(in "or the Commission, o'!io#sly in!ol!es the responsi'ility o" the Commission as a whole, or o" indi!id#al Commissioners&

The s"-se="ent %o&&e%tive resignation o! the Co&&ege o! Co issioners was "n#re%e'ente' an' -rie!&. &e!t the EU witho"t its De+e%"tive0& ,In "act, the same Commission ret#rned almost immediately to stay in o""ice #ntil the new one was sworn in six months later&-

*i""erent collecti!e ministerial responsi'ility) one man wron , whole 'oat sin( Interestin ly, the Committee o" Independent Experts also said that the Commission had an .ethical responsi'ilityH to act in accordance with proper standards in p#'lic li"e ,para& 0&<&1-, in addition to its le al and political responsi'ility #nder the Treaty& Was the Committee tappin into #nderlyin principles o" constit#tional responsi'ility at EU le!elW Tom(ins identi"ies two pro'lems with this !iew& To 2ins4

The "irst concerns the way in which %o&&e%tive res#onsi-i&it. is e #hasise' over in'ivi'"a& res#onsi-i&it.& The Commission appears to ha!e ta(en the !iew that collecti!e responsi'ility means that Co issioners "st not ro%2 the -oat4 they m#st remain loyal, and spea( with one !oice, re e -ering

at a&& ti es not to %riti%ise !e&&ow Co issioners& The %onstit"tiona& vision o! %o&&e%tive res#onsi-i&it., however, is ="ite the reverse o" this& Collecti!e Commission responsi'ility sho#ld re="ire that ea%h an' ever. e -er o! the Co ission has a %onstit"tiona& o-&igation to 2ee# wat%h over ea%h an' ever. other Co issioner& Collecti!e responsi'ility sho#ld mean that no Co issioner is a-&e to eva'e or avoi' res#onsi-i&it. -. #assing the -"%2 to another Co issioner, at least with re ard to decisions which ha!e 'een arri!ed at, and policies which ha!e 'een de!eloped 'y the Commission as a Colle ewhether nominally or really& On%e a #o&i%. has -een anno"n%e', an' on%e a 'e%ision has -een rea%he', a&& Co issioners are res#onsi-&e !or it, whether the iss#e was act#ally disc#ssed 'y the Commissioners

themsel!es or not, and whether or not any indi!id#al Commissioner was or was not payin attention at the time& This m#st 'e what collecti!e responsi'ility means, otherwise there is no means o" pre!entin one Commissioner "rom e!adin 7#estions on an iss#e merely 'y sayin that this has nothin to do with her, and is the responsi'ility o" some other Commissioner, who, when in his t#rn is 7#estioned, mi ht then also deny responsi'ility and 'lame someone else, and so on& As the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent has e+#resse' it, 6the #rin%i#&e o! %o&&egia&it. re ains i #ortant -"t sho"&' not e+e #t in'ivi'"a& Co issioners !ro the %onse="en%es, not only o" any personal wron doin , -"t a&so o! an. in%o #etent or neg&igent anage ent o! their own areas o! res#onsi-i&it.D(

Resi nation cannot 'e the only one way o" sanction C?arliament can only dismiss as a whole or the ECE dismiss personalD) 0::: o!erall 'eha!ior is not total reprehensi'le Cthe indi!id#al commission re"#se to resi n and lead to resi nation as a wholeD) /#t resh#""le is di""ic#lt in EU le!el) Now ?resident has the ri ht to dismiss personal commission To 2insB

The "inal pro'lem with the way in which constit#tional responsi'ility presently operates is connected to this pri!ile in o" collecti!e responsi'ility o!er indi!id#al&&& As we ha!e seen, #nless the ECE comp#lsorily retires an indi!id#al Commissioner #nder CArt& 1;2 T8EUD, the Commission stands or "alls to ether& In partic#lar, the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent has no #ower to re="ire in'ivi'"a& Co issioners to resign E(((F

Similarly, an in'ivi'"a& Co issioner %an -e !or%e' to resign on&. a!ter %o"rt a%tion, rather than as a res#lt o" parliamentary press#re& Not only is this a rather #nsophisticated approach4 it can also act as a protecti!e shield allow%in Commissioners more easily to escape "acin #p to the conse7#ences o" their actions& 8orcin the entire Commission to resi n is a draconian sanction6n#clear option6 was the phrase #sed to descri'e it in the E#ropean ?arliamentand is li(ely there"ore to 'e employed only in the most serio#s cases& That the Commission stands or "alls to ether in this way may diss#ade the E#ropean ?arliament "rom callin "or heads to roll where it is the resi nation o" an indi!id#al Commissioner which is really appropriate, rather than the premat#re nemesis o" the Commission as a whole&

The ina-i&it. o! the Par&ia ent to re="ire the resignation o! an in'ivi'"a& Co issioner is made more serio#s 'y !irt#e o" the "act that resi nation a##ears to -e the on&. san%tion avai&a-&e when things go wrong& This is a somewhat r#dimentary approach& I'ea&&., a range o! #ossi-&e san%tions wo"&' -e avai&a-&e to whi%hever #erson or -o'. en!or%es or s"#ervises the o-servation o! the #rin%i#&es o! res#onsi-i&it.& Co issioners sho"&' not -e e+#e%te' ne%essari&. to resign in a&& %ases where a ista2e has o%%"rre' !or whi%h sPhe is res#onsi-&e& Resignation sho"&' -e the "&ti ate san%tion, -"t not the on&. one&

The Co ission %risis o! );;; sho#ld not 'e exa erated& It wo#ld a##ear that the %o&&e%tive resignation, as we&& as the #o&iti%a& an' the e'ia rea%tion, were 'is#ro#ortionate to the evi'en%e #ro'"%e'& Tr#e, the Committee "o#nd the Commission6s -ehavio"r to have -een Dre#rehensi-&eD , -"t the overa&& &eve& o! s"%h -ehavio"r within the Co ission was not high& Also, the Committee only dealt with the details o" alle ations which had already 'een madeit did not cond#ct its own detecti!e wor( to #nco!er new cases o" mismana ement& In "act, most o" the alle ations ori inated in the period 'e"ore 0::H ,and were the responsi'il%ity o" the *elors Commission rather than the Santer Commission- and had already 'een ta(en #p internally and 'y the Commission6s anti)"ra#d #nit&

Ha' these a&&egations arisen in a Ge -er State s"%h as the U5, a normal response wo#ld ha!e 'een to sa%ri!i%e %ontroversia& #o&iti%a& !ig"res, s#ch as @s Cresson, in a resh"!!&e& However, the Commission is a m#ltinational instit#tion, and appointments at senior le!el ha!e to consider 7#estions o" national 'alance as well as merit& Trans!erring sta!! -etween #osts is a&so "%h ore %o #&i%ate' at EU than at national le!el& At the time o" the crisis, neither the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent nor the Presi'ent o! the Co ission ha' the #ower to 'is iss an in'ivi'"a& Co issioner, and with "s resson refusing to resign #she claimed she had the support of the $rench government%, the ommission had no alternative but to pledge its collective responsibility and s#'mit itsel" to a !ote o" no con"idence 'e"ore the E#ropean ?arliament&

As we saw, the Commission s#r!i!ed the !ote ,at the expense o" splits within the two lar est party ro#ps alon national lines- '#t had to accept scr#tiny 'y, and the concl#sion o", an independent committee& The Committee in t#rn stressed the concept o" collecti!e responsi'ility, and drew o#t implications which the Commission had ne!er 'e"ore 'een on the Commission6s radar& To'a., the Co ission is -oth %o&&e%tive&. an' in'ivi'"a&&. a%%o"nta-&e to the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent& The E#ropean ?arliament has a ri ht to hear and interro ate commissioners, 'oth orally and in writin , can esta'lish ad hoc committees o" in7#iry, and it %an sti&& resign the entire Co ission in %ase o! gross is%on'"%t( Sin%e the Ni%e Treat., the Presi'ent o! the Co ission has

the #ower to 'e an' the resignation o! in'ivi'"a& %o issioners o Art( )<3N4 TEU ?resident o" Commission3s power) 8irst amon the e7#al The powers o" the Presi'ent o! the E"ro#ean Co issiondescri'ed 'y 5ix as the ost #ower!"& o!!i%e in the E"ro#ean Unionare in%rease' -. the Lis-on Treat. This sa a shows that, #nder the existin Treaty re ime, the Presi'ent re="ires the %onsent o! the Co&&ege to 'is iss an in'ivi'"a& Commissioner& Under Art& 02,<- TEU ,.A e -er o! the Co ission sha&& resign i! the Presi'ent so re="estsD-, the Presi'ent is given the !or a& #ower to /hire an' !ire0 Co issioners& This de!elopment %&ear&. -oosts the Presi'ent0s stan'ing in re&ation to his or her %o&&eag"es, a2ing hi or her #ri "s inter

#ares 3that is, !irst a e="a&s4(

ong

The additional ,and existin - roles o" the ?resident are to sha#e the Co ission0s #o&i%ies as a who&e an' to 'eter ine the !"t"re 'ire%tion o! the EU& The Presi'ent a&so 'e%i'es on the interna& organi1ation o! the Co&&egeB -. a&&o%ating res#onsi-i&ities to in'ivi'"a& Co issioners> 'y ens"ring that the Co ission wor2s e!!i%ient&. an' %onsistent&.> and 'y resh"!!&ing the #ort!o&ios i! ne%essar.( /+R O&2 ?RESI*ENTS +8 T5E C+@@ISSI+N o Eose @an#el /arroso ,1JJ;) present-, a "ormer ?rime @inister o" ?ort# al, was 'ac(ed #nanimo#sly "or a second term as ?resident 'y EU leaders in E#ne 1JJ: and con"irmed 'y the E#ropean ?arliament in Septem'er 1JJ:& o Romano ?rodi ,0:::)1JJ;- ser!ed as ?rime @inister o" Italy 'e"ore and a"ter his term as ?resident o" the Commission&

o @an#el @arin ,0:::-, a Spanish politician, was ?resident on an interim 'asis& o Eac7#es Santer ,0::H)::-, a "ormer ?rime @inister o" L#xem'o#r , wasalon with "ellow commissioners"orced to resi n o!er corr#ption alle ations& o Eac7#es *elors ,0:OH):;- was a "ormer 8rench politician& PUESTI+NS .The Commission has not #nder one any "#ndamental str#ct#ral chan e since its inception& Its role is lar ely #nchan edY *o yo# a reeW Was the Commission ri ht to resi n collecti!ely o!er alle ations o" "ra#d, misman%a ement, and nepotismW Are the powers o" the ?resident o" the E#ropean Commission too !astW To which o""ice in the domestic ,ULcontext can the ?resident3s powers 'e li(enedW .The E#ropean ?arliament already has s#""icient powers and mechanisms to hold the Commission to acco#ntY *o yo# a ree with this statementW

Does the Co ission e+er%ise #ower e!!i%ient&.$ V arguably no, as on politically sensitive issue, politician did not desire to cede their power too much to Commission Ar #a'ly, the Commission does exercise its power e""iciently altho# h not in the tradi%tional way in which o!ernments iss#e r#les and re #lations& The Commission leads thro# h dialo #e, thro# h its powers o" initiation and in"l#ence& The powers o" the Commission ,li(e the powers o" the US president- are desi ned to identi"y new directions o" E#ropean inte ration& The "&ti!ario"s nat"re o! the Co issions tas(s does, howe!er, %arr. with it an inherent &a%2 o! e!!i%ien%.( It has a %hoi%e -etween &ea'ing an' e'iating, an' a&& too o!ten tries to 'o -oth&

It initiates so eti es swee#ing #o&i%. #ro#osa&s, which it then has to se&& as -eing in the %o on interest( The Commission is th#s easily ca# ht 'etween the roc( o" stri(in political 'ar ains and the hard place o" ens#rin "a!o#ra'le receptionand the -igger the EU -e%o es, the ore 'i!!i%"&t it is !or the Co ission to #"t !orwar' sing&e #o&i%. #ro#osa&s& N& N# ent 4 Amon st practitioners, de'ate has tended to 'e "oc#sed mainly on the extent to which an instit#tion that is #nelected sho#ld 'e exercisin si ni"icant powers& 8or those who ta(e a 'roadly inter o!ernmentalist position on what the nat#re o" the EU sho#ld 'e, the powers o" the Commission need to 'e restricted and the exercise o" what powers it has need to 'e "irmly controlled& /#t, "or those who are more inte rationist in spirit, a stron and not o!er%shac(led Commission is !ital i" the EU is to ha!e policies that are s#""iciently creati!e and am'itio#s to

tac(le the many policy pro'lems the EU "aces& /#t whate!er position is ta(en in these and related de'ates, it is indisp#ta'le that the Commission is a core instit#tional presence in the EU& When the EU is Din o#erationD, the Co ission is a& ost invaria-&. invo&ve' in so e signi!i%ant wa.( The "re7#ent appearance on the EU a enda o" #o&iti%a&&. sensitive atters, %o"#&e' with the 'esire o! #o&iti%ians not to %e'e too "%h #ower to others i! the. %an avoi' it, a. have res"&te' in at &east so e e -er states -eing re&"%tant in re%ent .ears to grant too "%h !"rther a"tono . to the Co ission, '#t the Commission nonetheless remains central and !ital to the whole EU system&

A DUAL EXECUTIVE Co#ncil) "or national a#tonomy, Commission) "or inte ration, EU ?arliament "or democracy o!ernance We ha!e seen that the three ain instit"tions per"orm 'i!!erent !"n%tions and that each instit#tion ma(es an in'e#en'ent %&ai o! &egiti a%.( o The Co"n%i& %&ai s to -e the g"ar'ian o! nationa& a"tono .> o the Co ission ,to ether with the Co#rt o" E#stice- %&ai s to -e the g"ar'ian o! e!!e%tive integration> and o the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent %&ai s to -e the g"ar'ian o! 'e o%rati% governan%e&

*o#'le exec#ti!e power) Commission and Co#ncil CCo#ncil dele ate the power to CommissionD I"t where 'oes e+e%"tive #ower in the EU &ie$ Simon 5ix pro!ides the most inno!ati!e answer 'y introd#cin the %on%e#t o! a /'"a& e+e%"tive0, within whi%h the Co"n%i& an' Co ission share the res#onsi-i&ities o! govern ent( The Co"n%i& is res#onsi-&e !or setting the e'i" 6 to &ong6ter agen'a, -. re!or ing the EU Treat., an' 'e&egating #o&iti%a& an' a' inistrative tas2s to the Co ission& In the areas in which e+e%"tive #owers have -een 'e&egate', the Co ission is res#onsi-&e !or 'istri-"ting the EU -"'get, onitoring #o&i%. i #&e entation 'y the mem'er states, and a2ing r"&es an' reg"&ations(

We ha!e seen that the e -er states have &i ite' the Co ission to %ertain reg"&ator. atters, s#ch as competition and a ric#lt#re, while Co"n%i& have retaine' %ontro& o! 2e. e+e%"tive #owers, s"%h as Treat. re!or , #o&i%. a2ing in re&ation to Co on Foreign an' Se%"rit. Po&i%., the "ormer third pillar ,?olice and E#dicial Cooperation in Criminal @atters-, &ong6ter agen'a setting, and the %oor'ination o! nationa& a%roe%ono i% #o&i%ies in the E"ro#ean Co"n%i&&

/#t Commission resem'le a Ca'inet which politically in!ol!ed in policy) ma(in and administrati!ely s#pported 'y own ministries C*FD independent "rom mem'er o" state We ha!e, howe!er, also seen that the Co ission has 'eve&o#e' some o" the attri'#tes o" a s"#ranationa& /govern ent0& The Co&&ege o! Co issioners rese -&es Ca-inet govern ent and the Co ission %risis o! );;; raise' iss"es re&ating to %o&&e%tive res#onsi-i&it.& The Co issioners are %areer #o&iti%ians who -ring their own i'eo&ogi%a& o-9e%tives to the EU0s #o&i%. a2ing #ro%ess E#o&iti%a&&.F A' inistrative&., the Co ission is6s"##orte' -. its own inistries in the !or o! the D7s& In short, the Co ission has the in%entives, the reso"r%es, an' the #ower to #"rs"e its own agen'a, in'e#en'ent&. !ro

those o! the e -er state govern ents( No chie" exec#ti!e and there"ore lin( to democratic acco#nta'ility S( Hi+ an' I( Ha.&an'B The res#lt is a system with stren ths and wea(nesses& The main stren th is that the d#al character o" the EU exec#ti!e "acilitates extensi!e deli'eration and compromise in the adop%tion and implementation o" EU policies& This is a si ni"icant achie!ement "or a continental) scale and m#lti)national political system, and it red#ces the li(elihood o" system 'rea(down& 5owe!er there are two i wea2nesses& #ortant

First, the "lip side o" %o #ro ise is a &a%2 o! overa&& #o&iti%a& &ea'ershi# and '"a&6e+e%"tive s.ste s ten' to -e %hara%teri1e' -. #o&i%. sta-i&it.( Se%on', and &in2e' to this iss"e, there is the #ro-&e o! 'e o%rati% a%%o"nta-i&it.&

There is no sing&e %hie! e+e%"tive, who the E"ro#ean #"-&i% %an Dthrow o"tD(

Chec(s and 'alances needed Constit#tional law, whether at national or at s#pranational le!el, consists o" two sides& +n the one hand, it maps o#t the exec#ti!e powers and "#nctions o" political instit#tions ,it empowers-& We ha!e seen that the EU has a d#almay'e e!en a tripleexec#ti!e that con%sists o" the Co#ncil o" @inisters and the Commission, and 'ehind the scenes, '#t more prominently a"ter the Lis'on Treaty created a "i #rehead, the E#ropean Co#ncil& This chap%ter has so "ar tried to set o#t and analyse the roles and a#thority o" these (ey E#ropean instit#tions-"t #o&iti%a& #ower, on%e %reate', nee's to -e %ontro&&e' an' %onstraine', an' it is to this a&&6i #ortant se%on' iss"e that we now t"rn(

DEGOCRAC8, LE7ITIGAC8, ACCOUNTAIILIT8, AND TRANSPARENC8 ?ower o" EU ha!e rown and ca#se p#'lic mistr#st and le itimacy iss#e As the #owers o! the E"ro#ean Union have grown, so have the #ro-&e s o! #"-&i% istr"st an' the &egiti a%. o! the EU0s %entra& instit"tions& Contrary to Eean @onnet3s "#nctionalist ass#mption, the -ene!its o! E"ro#ean integration are no &onger ta2en !or grante' -. %iti1ens o! the EU e -er states& The rati"ication o" the @aastricht Treaty s#""ered a set'ac( in 0::1 when it was re$ected 'y the *anes in a re"erend#m& The Nice and Lis'on rati"ication crises in Ireland, and the 8rench and *#tch re$ections o" the Constit#tional Treaty hi hli ht the citiGens3 percei!ed pro'lems with the E#ropean Union&

A( LE7ITIGAC8 Le itmacy is important as it has to ain s#pport "rom the o!erned Legiti a%. is an i #ortant %on%e#t in political science, which as2s whether the e+isting #o&iti%a& instit"tions re%eive a'e="ate s"##ort !ro the e -ers o! so%ietythis they may do, "or e+a #&e, 'y -eing s"!!i%ient&. re#resentative an' 'e o%rati%a&&. a%%o"nta-&e& A r"&er a. have the #ower to a2e &aws -. virt"e o! his or her o!!i%e, '#t witho"t the %onsent o! a &arge #ro#ortion o! the #o#"&ation, the r"&er0s e'i%ts a. &a%2 &egiti a%.& Legiti a%. is, there!ore, a -asi% %on'ition !or r"&e an' EU governan%e ,li(e the o!ernment o" any state- wo"&' not -e &egiti ate "n&ess it was %arrie' o"t with the %onsent o! the governe'(

EU adopt !or a& &egiti a%. as treaties rari"ied 'y mem'er states and do#'le democratic mandate Cdirect EU ?arliament and indirect national democraticD and decision) ma(in re7#ire P@AI#nanimity It is #se"#l to 'isting"ish /!or &egiti a%. !ro so%ia&0 &egiti a%.& a&0

The E"ro#ean Union is &egiti ate in a !or a& sense 'eca#se it was esta-&ishe', and has 'een extended, on the -asis o! treaties rati!ie' -. the e -er states& The E"ro#ean Union %&ai s to res#e%t the #rin%i#&e o! the r"&e o! &aw and the Treaties i #ose stri%t &i its on EU a%tivities( +n a day) to)day 'asis, the E#ropean Union e!en has a .'o"-&e 'e o%rati% an'ate0, 'eca#se it deri!es its le itimacy "rom two so#rces4 the nationa& govern ents ,which are represented in the Co#ncil- an' the 'ire%t&. e&e%te' E"ro#ean Par&ia ent&

In relation to acco#nta'ility, even in the #o&i%. areas in whi%h the E"ro#ean Union is %o #etent to a%t a&one, it is sti&& %onstraine' -. 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%e'"res that re="ire either s"#er a9orities 3MGV4 or even "nani it., as we&& as %on%"rrent a9orities a ong the three ain EU organs& 8ar "rom 'ein distant and detached, there are, in !a%t, "&ti#&e %hanne&s o! #o&iti%a& a%%o"nta-i&it., -oth 'ire%t&. via the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent 3as we have seen4 an' in'ire%t&. via e&e%te' nationa& o!!i%ia&s 3see A%%o"nta-i&it.4(

So%ia& &egiti a%. Csocial acceptance 'y the peopleD is not so stron as ministers m#ch hi her de ree o" isolation in EU "rom the national parliamentary scr#tiny than domestic policy ma(in Cin democratic senseD I" we shi"t the "oc#s away "rom "ormal proced#res and t"rn to ="estions o! -roa'er so%ia& a%%e#tan%e o! the E"ro#ean Union 'y the #eo#&e, then the #ro-&e -e%o es one o! 'e o%rati% %ontro& an', there!ore, o! so%ia& &egiti a%. in the o#eration o! the instit"tions& Th#s, policyma(in at EU le!el has not only 'ranched o#t into new areas that are nationally sensiti!e, -"t it is a&so 'o inate' -. e+e%"tive a%tors ,nationa& inisters in the Co"n%i& and govern ent a##ointees in the Co ission-& E+e%"tive 'o inan%e, -. itse&!, is not #ro-&e ati%#rovi'e' that the a%tions %an -e s%r"tini1e' -. nationa& #ar&ia ents&

The nationa& inisters in the Co"n%i& are "&ti ate&. a%%o"nta-&e to their nationa& #ar&ia ents, -"t on&. in a wea2 anner in relation to EU matters and the ma(in o" EU le islation& In other words, nationa& inisters wor2ing at EU &eve& en9o. a "%h higher 'egree o! iso&ation !ro nationa& #ar&ia entar. s%r"tin. an' %ontro& than the. 'o in the 'o esti% #o&i%. a2ing #ro%ess& As a conse7#ence, one e!!e%t o! E"ro#ean integration has -een an in%rease in the #ower o! e+e%"tives an' a 'e%rease in the #ower o! nationa& #ar&ia ents(

Gore so%ia& &egiti a%. in adoptin the P@A method so that the smaller mem'er states "rom 'ein '#lldoGed 'y lar er mem'er states CE#rope more closer to the peopleD The in%rease' "se o! MGV in the Co"n%i& since the mid)0:OJs an' the %o #arative wea2ness o! the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent ,in relation to the o!ernments in the Co#ncil- ha!e also helped to strengthen the e+e%"tive an' to high&ight the &egiti a%. #ro-&e ( It raises the ="estion "n'er what %ir%" stan%es, and in what areas, are citiGens o" the EU e -er states #re#are' to a%%e#t a9orit. r"&e$ At national le!el, ma$ority r#le is accepted 'y the people precisely 'eca#se there is .a people3in other words, a Staats!ol(, nation, or demos, which #nites the existin political, economic, social, and c#lt#ral interests into a (ind o" socio) psycholo ical l#e that s#pports ma$ority decisions thro# h tolerance and solidarity&

In contrast, the E#ropean Union consists o" n#mero#s mem'er states, the peoples o" which do not share the same s#'stanti!e c#lt#ral !al#es, s#ch as reli ion and lan #a e> in that sense, they clearly lac( the same "o#ndations as a nation state& @ora!osi(4 Li(e most modern polities, the EU rests instead on pra matic political practices consens#ally accepted 'y o!erlappin c#lt#ral and political ro#ps& The tr#e pillars o" the EUeconomic wel"are, h#man ri hts, li'eral democracy, and the r#le o" law appeal to E#ropeans re ardless o" national or political identity&

The res#ltin instit#tion is sta'le not 'eca#se it is c#lt#rally coherent, '#t 'eca#se it ser!es the complex, increasin ly interwo!en interests o" citiGens in interdependent, ad!anced ind#strial democracies& No si ni"icant ro#p in any mem'er state "a!o#rs withdrawal "rom this arran ement C,&&TDhe EU6s s#ccess and d#ra'ility pro!e that alternati!e conceptions are possi'le&

+ne s#ch alternati!e conception is Eoseph Weiler3s principle o" constit#tional tolerance3, which capt#res the E#ropean citiGens3 acceptance o" EU law as 'indin , e!en tho# h their own o!ernment may ha!e disappro!ed o" the le al meas#re& Ge -er states with the s a&&est n" -er o! votes %o"&' -e e+#e%te' to !ee& #arti%"&ar&. v"&nera-&e in &ight o! the in!&"en%e an' voting #ower wie&'e' -. the &arger e -er states( So in or'er to #rote%t the s a&&er e -er states !ro -eing -"&&'o1e' , -. the &arger e -er states, sa!eg"ar's have -een -"i&t into the e+isting s.ste o! weighte' voting in the Co"n%i&( It is even #ossi-&e !or a %oa&ition o! s a&&er %o"ntries to o"tvote their &arger ,pop#lation)wiseco#nterparts, even tho"gh the.

re#resent &ess than one ha&! o! the EU0s tota& #o#"&ation& The intrinsi% a-sen%e o! so%ia& g&"e a ong E"ro#ean %iti1ens ne%essitates %o #&e+ voting e%hanis s and di""#ses exec#ti!e power'#t it a&so high&ights the i #ortan%e o! so%ia& &egiti a%. an' the nee' to -ring the E"ro#ean Union %&oser to the #eo#&e0(

I( ACCOUNTAIILIT8 EU is o!ernance witho#t o!t, there is not desi ned "or political acco#nta'ility Cthere was no di""erent 'tw political "ail#re and personal acco#nta'ilityD A%%o"nta-i&it. is increasin ly !iewed as a ne%essar. %on'ition !or &egiti a%. and is connected to the idea o" representation& In Western 'e o%ra%ies, a%%o"nta-i&it. is the %o"nter#art o! 'e&egation and #s#ally occ#rs alon !ertical linesthat is, the voters 'e&egate !i'"%iar. Etr"stF #ower to their #o#"&ar re#resentatives in e&e%tions, who dele ate power to a ca'inet o" ministers, who dele ate power to their ci!il ser!ants or to other administrati!e 'odies& This 'e&egation o! #ower 'oes, however, %o e with strings atta%he'4 i! the re#resentatives a-"se their #ower, the. %an -e %a&&e' to a%%o"nt(

Po&iti%a& a%%o"nta-i&it. o#erates in the o##osite 'ire%tion to that o! 'e&egation& Po&iti%ians ro"tine&. a#o&ogi1e, resign, an' even &ose e&e%tions, i! the. have &ost the tr"st o! their voters( :(H(H( Wei&erB As re ards acco#nta'ility, e!en the 'asic condition o" representati!e democracy, namely, that at election time the citiGens Mcan throw the sco#ndrels o#tMthat is, re#&a%e the govern entC'oes not o#erate in E"ro#e& The !or o! E"ro#ean governan%e, governan%e witho"t govern ent, is and will remain "or considera'le time, perhaps "ore!er, s#ch that there is no Qgovern entQ to throw o"t& Dis issa& o! the Co ission -. Par&ia ent 3or a##roving the a##oint ent o! the Co ission

#resi'ent4 is not ="ite the sa not e!en remotely so& Startlin ly , the #o&iti%a& a%%o"nta-i&it. o! E"ro#e is s"r#rising&. wea2&

e,

There ha!e 'een some spectac#lar political "ail#res o" E#ropean o!ernance& The em'arrassin Copenha en cli%mate "iasco> the wea( ,at 'est- realiGation o" the m#ch)to#ted Lis'on a enda ,a&(&a& Lis'on strate y or Lis'on process-> the !ery story o" the de"#nct MConstit#tionM, to mention '#t three& It is hard to point, in these instances, to any meas#re o" political acco#nta'ility, o" someone payin a political price, as wo#ld 'e the case in national politics& In !a%t, it is 'i!!i%"&t to #oint to a sing&e instan%e o! a%%o"nta-i&it. !or #o&iti%a& !ai&"re as 'istin%t !ro #ersona& a%%o"nta-i&it. !or is%on'"%t in the annals o" E#ropean inte ration&

This is not, decidedly not, a story o" corr#ption or mal"easance& @y arg" ent is that this !ai&"re is roote' in the ver. str"%t"re o! E"ro#ean governan%e& It is not 'esigne' !or #o&iti%a& a%%o"nta-i&it.&

No acco#nta'ility) red#ce the le itimacy o" EU A%%o"nta-i&it. is one o! the ha&& ar2s o! 'e o%rati% governan%e& The shi"t "rom policyma(in 'y national o!ernments to transnational EU o!ernance has not on&. high&ighte' the a-sen%e o! a so%ia& -asis, or 'e os, -"t a&so a%%o"nta-i&it. 'e!i%its, which in t#rn i #a%t on the #er%eive' &egiti a%. o! the E"ro#ean Union& The (ey 7#estion is whether the E#ropean Union, as a new, transnational, and m#ltile!el "orm o" o!ernance, re7#ires new and di""erent "orms o" acco#nta'ility&

Addition new horiGontal "orm o" acco#nta'ility As we saw in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, accordin to the .West inster o'e&0, political acco#nta'ility is exercised hierarchically, or verti%a&&., thro# h ministerial res#onsi-i&it. to the U5 Par&ia ent( The system o" hierarchical political acco#nta'ility ,'y con!ention, ministers are acco#nta'le to ?arliament "or all o" the actions o" o!ernment, incl#din those o" ci!il ser!ants- has, howe!er, %o e "n'er #ress"re !ro hori1onta& !or s o! a%%o"nta-i&it., which in%&"'e a%%o"nta-i&it. to a' inistrative !or" s, %iti1ens, an' %ivi& so%iet., as well as more in'ivi'"a& !or s o! a%%o"nta-i&it.& This is not only political rhetoric4 the new Art( )) TEU %reates a re="ire ent in eneral terms "or 'ia&og"e -etween the EU instit"tions an' %ivi& so%iet.(

The Lis-on Treat. a&so #rovi'es !or a E"ro#ean Citi1ens Initiative 3ECI4, an e+#eri enta& !or o! 'ire%t 'e o%ra%. that ena'les ) i&&ion %iti1ens to #"t an iss"e on the Co issions agen'a ,Art& 00,;- TEU> Art& 1;,0- T8EU-& The esta-&ish ent o! o -"'s en, a"'itors, an' ="asi6 a"tono o"s or in'e#en'ent agen%ies %ha&&enge the tra'itiona& s.ste o! #o&iti%a& %ontro& thro"gh the inister an' o!!er a&ternatives to tra'itiona& verti%a& !or s o! a%%o"nta-i&it.( Altho# h these administrati!e "or#ms may report to ?arliament or to the minister, the. 'o not stan' in a hierar%hi%a& re&ationshi# to the a%tors( Nor 'o the. re#&a%e the tra'itiona& !or s o! #o#"&ar %ontro&B

E"ro#ean governan%e re="ires -oth tra'itiona& an' new !or s o! a%%o"nta-i&it.(

Acco#nta'ility is not only a technical pro'lem '#t also a political pro'lem which exacer'ated 'y a'sence o" politician act#ally committed to E#ropean willin to ta(e the ris( inte rate the E#rope 8inally, as Peterson an' Sha%2&eton point o#t, a%%o"nta-i&it. is not 9"st a te%hni%a& #ro-&e that %an -e !i+e' -. tin2ering with the nationa& an'Por E"ro#ean instit"tions& It is a&so a #o&iti%a& #ro-&e that is e+a%er-ate' -. the a-sen%e o! #o&iti%ians who are %o itte' to the E"ro#ean %a"se, wi&&ing to ta2e #o&iti%a& ris2s to 'rive !orwar' the #ro9e%t o! integration, an' 'raw ins#iration !ro the /heroi%0 e#o%h o! E"ro#ean inte ration in the 0:OJs& E& ?eterson and @& Shac(leton, MConcl#sionM, in E& ?eterson and @& Shac(leton ,eds- The Instit#tions o" the E#ropean Union, Krd edn ,1J01, +x"ord4 +U8-, p& K:: I" there is one sin le, '#rnin 7#estion that arises "rom st#dyin

the EU6s instit#tions, it is the !exed acco#nta'ility 7#estion4 how can the Union6s instit#tions, in the a'sence o" a tr#ly E#ropean polity, 'ecome more acco#nta'le to E#ropean citiGens and th#s a more le itimate le!el o" o!ernanceW In o#r !iew, it is di""ic#lt to ima ine that the pro'lem can 'e sol!ed sim%ply with a dose o" direct democracy, s#ch as 'y instit#tin the direct election o" the ?resident o" the Commission, empowerin national parliaments in EU decision)ma(in , or spendin more to "oster tr#ly pan) E#ropean political parties& It mi ht 'e rather easier to en!isa e the "#t#re election o" o!ernments a'le and willin to do a 'etter $o' o" sellin the EU6s instit#%tions to a!era e citiGens as 'oth necessary and competent a ents in the tas(s o" o!ernin E#rope, and de"endin its interests in a new, modern, and increasin ly lo'aliGed world&

C( TRANSPARENC8 8inally, the Lis-on Treat. a&so in%reases the trans#aren%. o! the instit"tions an' their 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%esses& 9o# will recall that meetin s o" the E"ro#ean Co"n%i& an' o! the Co"n%i& o! the E"ro#ean Union were o!ten he&' in se%ret& That wi&& no &onger -e #ossi-&e in the !"t"re& Arti%&e )A TFEU In order to promote ood o!ernance and ens#re the participation o" ci!il society, the Union instit#tions, 'odies, o""ices and a encies shall %on'"%t their wor2 as o#en&. as #ossi-&e& The E"ro#ean Par&ia ent sha&& eet in #"-&i%, as sha&& the Co"n%i& when %onsi'ering an' voting on a 'ra!t &egis&ative a%t&

An. %iti1en o! the Union, and any nat#ral or le al person residin or ha!in its re istered o""ice in a @em'er State, sha&& have a right o! a%%ess to 'o%" ents o! the Union instit"tions, 'odies, o""ices and a encies, whate!er their medi#m, s#'$ect to the principles and the conditions to 'e de"ined in accordance with this para raph& Feneral principles and limits on ro#nds o" p#'lic or pri!ate interest o!ernin this ri ht o" access to doc#ments shall 'e determined 'y the E#ropean ?arliament and the Co#ncil, 'y means o" re #lations, actin in accordance with the ordinary le islati!e proced#re& Each instit#tion, 'ody, o""ice or a ency shall ens#re that its proceedin s are transparent and shall ela'orate in its own R#les o" ?roced#re speci"ic pro!isions re ardin access to its doc#ments, in accordance with the re #lations re"erred to in the second s#'para raph& The Co#rt o" E#stice o" the E#ropean Union, the E#ropean Central /an(

and the E#ropean in!estment /an( shall 'e s#'$ect to this para raph only when exercisin their administrati!e tas(s& The E#ropean ?arliament and the Co#ncil shall ens#re p#'lication o" the doc#ments relatin to the le islati!e proced#res #nder the terms laid down 'y the re #lations re"erred to in the second s#'para raph&

NATIONAL PARLIAGENTAR8 SCRUTIN8 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Iss#e whether scr#tiniGed 'y domestic parliament is happened in limited way Do E"ro#ean e+e%"tive instit"tions e+er%ise too #ower$ "%h

Do nationa& #ar&ia ents ere&. r"--er6sta # EU &egis&ation that is #&a%e' -e!ore the W *o they ha!e s#""icient powers o" scr#tinyW We ha!e already hinted that there is a ro&e to #&a. !or nationa& #ar&ia ents in the #o&i%. a2ing #ro%essand it is one o! the e+#&i%it ai s o! the Lis-on Treat. to enhan%e the .democratic le itimacy o" the Union ,see ?ream'le-&

The "ollowin section will examine the role o" the UL ?arliament in that process& It is "# to ea%h e -er state to 'evise its own e%hanis s !or s%r"tini1ing #ro#ose' EU &egis&ation, and "or monitorin and challen in the E#ropean Union& The (ey iss#e is that, in the #"re&. 'o esti% context, a inister wi&& s"%%ee' in steering a Ii&& into an A%t o! Par&ia ent on&. i! the U5 Par&ia ent a%%e#ts the &egis&ative #ro#osa&> at the EU &eve&, however, the sa e inister a. agree to &egis&ation witho"t -eing s"-9e%t to the sa e stringent #ro%e'"ra& sa"e #ards o" a parliamentary democracy& Ie%a"se Co"n%i& #ro%ee'ings are not trans#arent and 'eca#se, in any case, Co"n%i& e -ers a%t %o&&e%tive&. 3so a U5 inister a. have -een o"t6vote'4, it is virt"a&&. i #ossi-&e to esta-&ish

how an in'ivi'"a& in the Co"n%i&&

inister vote'

This section will examine the &i ite' wa.s in whi%h nationa& #ar&ia ents %an s%r"tini1e inisters an' whether their ro&e in the EU0s instit"tiona& s.ste sho"&' -e enhan%e'(

UL own scr#tiny committee Aery soon a!ter the U50s a%%ession to the E"ro#ean Co "nit. in 0:2K, the Ho"ses o! -oth Co ons an' the Lor's set "# %o ittees to s%r"tini1e #ro#ose' EC 'ire%tives an' reg"&ations( Today, the 5o#se o" Commons has two committees dealin with EU matters4 the E#ropean Scr#tiny Committee ,ESC- and the 8orei n A""airs Committee ,8AC-&

A& HOUSE OF COGGONS EUROPEAN SCRUTIN8 COGGITTEE EESCF6 e%amined the ability of national parliaments to scrutini&e proposed E' legislation and to influence it before decisions are made Lac( o" time and in"ormation lead to no scr#tiny ta(en place The E#ropean Scr#tiny Committee ,ESC- in the 5o#se o" Commons e+a ine' the a-i&it. o! nationa& #ar&ia ents to s%r"tini1e #ro#ose' EU &egis&ation and to in!&"en%e it -e!ore 'e%isions are a'e in a E#ne 1JJ1 report entitled De o%ra%. an' A%%o"nta-i&it. in the EU an' the Ro&e o! Nationa& Par&ia ents& It re%ogni1e' that &egis&ative #ro#osa&s are o!ten #"t !orwar' !or agree ent -e!ore nationa& #ar&ia ents ha!e ha' ti e to %onsi'er the , so eti es on the -asis o! &ast6 in"te negotiation(

A( C.ganB The (ey iss#es "or the 5o#se o" Commons when scr#tinisin EU le islati!e proposals are time and the prompt pro!ision o" the necessary in"ormation& The #ri ar. o-9e%tive o! the s%r"tin. #ro%ess is to in!&"en%e the inister #rior to the Co"n%i& a'o#ting its 'e!initive %o 6 on #osition& In this Report, the E#ropean Scr#tiny Committee identi"ied no less than nine occasions 'etween April 1JJJ and E#ne 1JJ0 when a &a%2 o! ti e an' in!or ation #re6vente' a'e="ate, or in some cases an., s%r"tin. !ro ta2ing #&a%e&

In all these instances the ca#se o" the pro'lem was either a !ai&"re -. the re&evant govern ent 'e#art ent to #rovi'e an E+#&anator. Ge oran'" a-o"t the #ro#osa&, or a !ai&"re -. the Co ission to #rovi'e the te+t within the g"i'e&ines contained in the Amsterdam ?rotocol on National ?arliaments&

P"r#ose o! s%r"tin.) 'e in"ormed a'o#t EU proposal and the e""ect on UL, in"l#ence the minister and hold the minister to acco#nt The E#ropean Scr#tiny Committee in the 5o#se o" Commons has set o"t a 'e!inition o! the #"r#ose o! the s%r"tin. s.ste in the Ho"se o! Co ons( Ho"se o! Co S%r"tin. Co ons E"ro#ean itteeB

To ens"re that e -ers are in!or e' o! EU #ro#osa&s &i2e&. to a!!e%t the Unite' 5ing'o , to pro!ide a so#rce o" in"ormation and analysis "or the p#'lic, and to ens"re that the Ho"se an' the E"ro#ean S%r"tin. Co ittee, an' thro"gh the other organisations an' in'ivi'"a&s, have o##ort"nities to a2e Ginisters aware o! their views on EU #ro#osa&s, see2 to in!&"en%e Ginisters an' ho&' Ginisters to a%%o"nt(

The Wor( o" committee It consists o" si+teen GPs, with a party)political %o #osition re!&e%ting #art. re#resentation in the 5o#se o" Commons enerally ,so, in 1J01, ei ht Conser!ati!e, six La'o#r, two Li'eral *emocrat, representati!es-& The ESC re%eives %o#ies o! EU 'o%" ents ,s#ch as Commission proposals-, to ether with an E+#&anator. Ge oran'" !ro the U5 govern ent 'e#art ent responsi'le "or that area o" policy& The ESC s tas( is to assess the /&ega& an' #o&iti%a& i #ortan%e0 o! ea%h o! the EU doc#ments recei!ed over ),)?? a .ear& It also 'eter ines whi%h is to -e 'is%"sse'& eas"re

De-ates wi&& ore %o on&. ta2e #&a%e in the ESC, rather than on the floor of the (ouse of Commons.

The ESC also s%r"tini1es the wor2s o! the Co"n%i& o! the EU ,thro# h parliamentary 7#estions and sometimes 'y 7#estionin ministers in person-, and a. o%%asiona&&. %on'"%t genera& in="iries into &ega&, #ro%e'"ra&, or instit"tiona& 'eve&o# ents in the E#ropean Union&

A "ormer ESC chairman, :i . Hoo' GP, descri'ed the method o" wor( o" the select committee as "ollows& Select Committee on @oderniGation o" the 5o#se o" Commons, @in#tes o" E!idence, H @ay 1JJQ When we come to o#r wee(ly meetin on a Wednesday, yo# are ri ht, we can ha!e a pile a'o#t this hi h, KJ or ;J doc#ments to loo( at& What we ha!e with each doc#ment is an A; paper "rom o#r ad!iser tellin #s the treaty 'ase, whether it is le ally or politically important or not, what it see(s to do, may'e some 'rie" history on it and then there is a recommenda%tion on whether it has 'een loo(ed at and can 'e cleared or whether it is politically or le ally important and it has to 'e "#rther scr#tinised, whether to hold it 'ac( and et "#ller in"or%mation ,that is sendin it to departments "or "#rther in"ormation, the Ca'inet +""ice, etc&-& With the other in"ormation it will then come 'ac( to #s and the recommendation will either 'e to o to de'ate 'eca#se it is le ally or politically important, or e!en then we

et some recommendations that the in"ormation is not satis"actory and we sho#ld despatch a re7#est "or a 'it more in"ormation and then we will ma(e a decision to hold it 'ac( a ain to et the in"ormation, and then e!ent#ally we ma(e the recommendation& It a. go to 'e-ate an' when it goes to 'e-ate then it is %&eare' !ro o"r s%r"tin. process& It is then in the han's o! Par&ia ent, !or the Stan'ing Co ittees or on the F&oor o! the Ho"se(

I( HOUSE OF COGGONS FOREI7N AFFAIRS COGGITTEE The 5o#se o" Commons 8orei n A""airs Committee ,8AC- is one o" the 'e#art enta& se&e%t %o ittees, and is a'e "# o! !o"rteen GPs !ro the govern ent an' O##osition #o&iti%a& #arties( It is char ed with onitoring the wor2 o! the Foreign an' Co onwea&th O!!i%e, so its re it e+ten's "%h wi'er than the E"ro#ean Union, a&tho"gh EU atters are an i #ortant as#e%t o! its wor2( The 8AC can call !or -oth written an' ora& s"- issions !ro intereste' #arties& The Foreign Se%retar. an' his or her inisters o!ten a##ear -e!ore it to give ora& evi'en%e&

The FAC %an &a"n%h in="iries, #"-&ish a re#ort when the in="ir. has !inishe', and re#orts to the Ho"se o! Co ons( These re#orts are so 'e-ate' -. GPs& eti es

/y %onvention, the govern ent res#on's to an FAC re#ort within two onths o! its #"-&i%ation(

C& PARLIAGENTAR8 DEIATES ON EU GATTERS6 on legislative and non)legislative matters and in *hite Paper The U5 Par&ia ent is a-&e to %a&& the govern ent to a%%o"nt !or its #o&i%ies re&ating to the E"ro#ean Union thro"gh 'e-ates on the !&oor o! -oth Ho"ses o! Par&ia ent( Legis&ative 'e-ates wi&& 'ea& with EU &aws 'oth re="iring #ri ar. &egis&ation ,which are 'e-ate' &i2e other Ii&&s- and i #&e ente' -. 'e&egate' &egis&ation ,which may 'e de'ated in stan'ing %o ittee-& Non6&egis&ative 'e-ates wi&& 'ea& with EU #o&i%ies ,"or example, the Common A ric#lt#ral ?olicy-, and will 'e initiate' either -. the govern ent or the O##osition&

Par&ia ent has the %han%e to 'e-ate govern ent White Pa#ers& The six)monthly retrospecti!e White ?apers called *e!elopments in the E#ropean Union ha!e now 'een re#&a%e' -. !orwar'6&oo2ing White Pa#ers %a&&e' Pros#e%ts !or the EU in E.earF(

*& PARLIAGENTAR8 MUESTIONS) +oreign secretary, Minister +or Europe be -uestioned A second mechanism thro# h which the o!ernment can 'e %a&&e' to a%%o"nt in re&ation to EU #o&i%ies is thro# h parliamentary 7#estions ,?Ps-& Either the Foreign Se%retar. or the Ginister !or E"ro#e wi&& a2e state ents an' answer 3written an' ora&4 PMs on the E"ro#ean Union& Until 0:OH, there was a special ,1J) min#te- slot "or oral EU 7#estions, '#t since then, they ha!e 'een answered to ether with other "orei n a""airs 7#estions "or a'o#t an ho#r, once a month on a!era e& Written ="estions are answere' ore !re="ent&.(

E& THE HOUSE OF LORDS SCRUTIN8) report for information, recommend for debates for .ords, subcommittee with speciali&ed area is set up The Ho"se o! Lor's E"ro#ean Union Se&e%t Co ittee a&so s%r"tini1es EU &egis&ative #ro#osa&s and the o!ernment3s response to them& Its "ormal terms o" re"erence are .To %onsi'er E"ro#ean Union 'o%" ents an' other atters re&ating to the E"ro#ean Union&3 It %on'"%ts reg"&ar an' 'etai&e' in="iries into s#e%i!i% #ro#osa&s ,"or example, "ra#d, third)pillar matters, the dra"t Constit#tional Treaty-, and re#orts either !or in!or ation or with re%o en'ation !or 'e-ate in the Lor's&

The EU Committee carries o#t m#ch o" its wor( thro"gh seven s"-%o ittees ,identi"ied as A)F-, ea%h o! whi%h s#e%ia&i1es in a #arti%"&ar s"-9e%t area& The s"-%o ittees #re#are re#orts, whi%h "st -e agree' -. the Se&e%t Co ittee as a who&e -e!ore #"-&i%ation( The Committees in the Commons and the Lords complement each other, and cooperate closely with one another&

?+LIC9 AREAS +8 T5E 5+USE +8 L+R*S EU SU/C+@@ITTEES A Economic and 8inancial A""airs, Trade and International Relations, incl#din the EC /#d et / Internal @ar(et, incl#din comm#nications, ener y, transport, research, and space C 8orei n A""airs, *e"ence, and *e!elopment ?olicy * En!ironment and A ric#lt#re E Law and Instit#tions 8 5ome A""airs F Social ?olicy and Cons#mer A""airs, incl#din health, wor(er protection, and ed#cation

F( THE ROLE OF THE SCOTTISH PARLIAGENT The S%ot&an' A%t );;K gives the S%ottish Par&ia ent a"thorit. to i #&e ent EU &aw "or S%ot&an' in %ases in whi%h the s"-9e%t atter o! the new #ie%e o! &egis&ation !a&&s within or a""ects a 'evo&ve' #o&i%. area& The S%ottish Par&ia ent has its own E"ro#ean an' E+terna& Re&ations Co ittee, the remit o" which is to consider and report on4 o proposals "or E#ropean Comm#nities le islation> o the implementation o" E#ropean Comm#nities le islation> o any E#ropean Comm#nities or E#ropean Union iss#e> o the de!elopment and implementation o" the Scottish Administrations lin(s with co#ntries and territories o#tside Scotland, the E#ropean Comm#nities ,and their instit#tions-, and other international or aniGations> and

o coordination o" the international acti!ities o" the Scottish Administration& Li(e its Westminster co#nterpart, the S%ottish %o ittee onitors #ro#osa&s !or EU &egis&ation an' s%r"tini1es the anner in which the S%ottish 7overn ent i #&e ents EU &egis&ation, or the way in which it examines EU iss#es& The S%ottish 7overn ent has an EU O!!i%e in Ir"sse&s( It s"##orts the EU6re&ate' wor2 o! the govern ent an' he&#s to in%rease S%ot&an'0s in!&"en%e in the 'e%ision6 a2ing #ro%ess& It also wor2s %&ose&. with the Unite' 5ing'o 0s Per anent Re#resentation to the EU, ULRE?, which re ains res#onsi-&e !or re#resenting the views o! the Unite' 5ing'o as a who&e to the EU instit"tions(

7( SHOULD NATIONAL PARLIAGENTS PLA8 A 7REATER ROLE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION$ TEC and TEU witho#t in!ol!ed o" domestic parliament and in!ol!e parliament may lead to sel"ish state What role sho#ld national parliaments play in the EU instit#tional systemW +n the one hand, the #ar&ia ents o! the e -er states were given no !or a& !"n%tions "n'er TEC an' TEU ,'#t note the o'li ations in the Lis'on Treaty-, a&tho"gh the. are res#onsi-&e !or i #&e enting EU &egis&ation& There!ore, invo&ving nationa& #ar&ia ents in the EU3s law)ma(in process a. "#set the -a&an%e -etween nationa& #ar&ia ents an' the EU instit"tions(

In partic#lar, the nationa&i1ing0 &aw6 a2ing #ro%ess a. #ro'"%e Dse&!ish State6%entri% o"t%o es3, which #a. ins"!!i%ient attention to E"ro#ean e%ono i% an' so%ia& #o&i%ies&

?arliament scr#tiny may not 'e the matter as national o!t may o#t!oted @oreo!er, while 7#ali"ied ma$ority !otin in the Co#ncil has made decision)ma(in more e""icient ,mem'er states do not ha!e a !eto and %an -e o"tvote' -. the a9orit.-, it has a&so !"rther argina&i1e' nationa& #ar&ia ents within the integration #ro%essB 'oes s%r"tin. -. nationa& #ar&ia ents atter when nationa& govern ents a. -e o"tvote' in the Co"n%i&$

?arliament is important in inte ration o" E#rope, a lin( 'tw people and Union, so Treaty o" Nice pro!ide s#'sidiarity control +n the other hand, national parliaments ha!e lost o#t in the process o" E#ropean inte% ration and so, ar #a'ly, nationa& #ar&ia ents o"ght to have a "%h greater ro&e than at present& Nationa& #ar&ia ents are an i #ortant so"r%e o! &egiti a%. !or the Union, and a 'ire%t an' esta-&ishe' &in2 -etween the Union an' the #eo#&es o! the e -er states, and the Treat. o! Ni%e 3>??)4 renewe' interest in giving nationa& #ar&ia ents a ore !or a& ro&e in the EU0s &egis&ative #ro%essespecially in relation to s#'sidiarity control&

The s"-si'iarit. #rin%i#&e) competences not conferred upon the 'nion in the Treaties remain with the Member /tates S"-si'iarit. is a ne-"&o"s 'o%trine that is !re="ent&. #o&iti%i1e' an' is"n'erstoo' The principle was introd#ced ,altho# h not 'y name- in the Sin le E#ropean Act 0:O<,HH which a#thoriGed Comm#nity action re ardin the en!ironment to the extent that its o'$ecti!es .can 'e attained 'etter at the Comm#nity le!el3& S#'sidiarity was ele!ated to a . eneral principle3 o" Comm#nity law 'y the @aastricht Treaty in 0::1& It is c#rrently enshrined in the "ollowin pro!ision&

Arti%&e A TEU Ee+#&aine' -e&owF o The limits o" Union competences are o!erned 'y the principle o" con"erral& The #se o" Union competences is o!erned 'y the principle o" s#'sidiarity and proportionality& o Under the principle o" con"erral, the Union shall act only within the limits o" the competences con"erred #pon it 'y the @em'er States in the Treaties to attain the o'$ecti!es set o#t therein& Competences not con"erred #pon the Union in the Treaties remain with the @em'er States& o Un'er the #rin%i#&e o! s"-si'iarit., in areas whi%h 'o not !a&& within its e+%&"sive %o #eten%e, the Union sha&& a%t on&. i! an' in so !ar as the o-9e%tives o! the #ro#ose' a%tion %annot -e s"!!i%ient&. a%hieve' -. the Ge -er States, either at central le!el or at re ional and local le!el, '#t can rather, 'y reason o" the scale or e""ects o" the proposed action, 'e 'etter achie!ed at Union le!el&

The instit#tions o" the Union shall apply the principle o" s#'sidiarity as laid down in the ?rotocol on the application o" the principles o" s#'sidiarity and proportionality& National ?arliaments ens#re compliance with the principle o" s#'sidiarity in accordance with the pro)ced#re set o#t in that ?rotocol& o Under the principle o" proportionality, the content and "orm o" Union action shall not exceed what is necessary to achie!e the o'$ecti!es o" the Treaties&

S#'sidiarity remain the so!erei n power o" states In its proced#ral "orm, s"-si'iarit. is a %a"tio"s 'evi%e to 'eter ine the 'ivision o! #o&i%. a2ing res#onsi-i&ities 'etween the E#ropean Union and the @em'er States& The #rin%i#&e 'oes not threaten the sovereign #owers o! the Ge -er States4 Art( @ TEU clari"ies "or the "irst time and in express terms that %o #eten%es not %on!erre' "#on the Union in the Treaties re ain with the Ge -er States3, and that the EU /sha&& res#e%t their essentia& State !"n%tions, incl#din ens#rin the territoria& integrit. o! the State, aintaining &aw an' or'er an' sa!eg"ar'ing nationa& se%"rit.&3 In partic#lar, nationa& se%"rit. re ains the so&e res#onsi-i&it. o! ea%h Ge -er State(3

S#'sidiarity sho#ld not applied when EU has the excl#si!e competence S"-si'iarit. a&so 'oes not a##&. in the !ew #o&i%. areas where the EU has e+%&"sive %o #eten%es ,s#ch as the common commercial policy, "isheries conser!ation, or monetary policy "or the E#ro)states-&

Where share competence, then EU only act where EU action 'etter than mem'er states Instead, it applies in areas o! share' %o #eten%es where there is a %hoi%e -etween "sing %o&&e%tive a%tion thro"gh the EU instit"tions, or "sing in'ivi'"a& nationa& #ower& The #rin%i#&e o! s"-si'iarit. in Art( A3*4 TEU re7#ires that le islati!e action 'e ta(en at the appropriate le!el, which means that the EU sho"&' a%t on&. i! it %an a%hieve the o-9e%tives o! the #ro#ose' EU a%tion -etter than the Ge -er States, and !ice !ersa& @oreo!er, the principle o" proportionality in Art( A3@4 TEU stip#lates that .Union a%tion sha&& not e+%ee' what is ne%essar. to a%hieve the o-9e%tives o! the Treaties0(

S#'sidiarity ali(e to "ederation while UL is not "ederally in str#ct#re S"-si'iarit. also, howe!er, has a s#'stanti!e "orm, 'eca#se it s"ggests that #o&iti%a& 'e%isions sho"&' -e ta2en %as %&ose&. as #ossi-&e to the %iti1en ,Art& 0 TEU-, implying, where possi'le, a #re!eren%e !or 'evo&ve' 'e%ision6 a2ing even within the e -er state& This was the "orm that was relied #pon 'y the /ritish o!ernment to reconcile the electorate to the "ederaliGin implications o" the @aastricht Treaty& S"-si'iarit. ten's to -e is"n'erstoo' in the Unite' 5ing'o , -e%a"se it is not !e'era&&. str"%t"re'&

In "ederal states, .s"-si'iarit.0, or /!e'era&is 0, are wa.s in whi%h to 'e!ine an' &i it %entra& #owers an' %o #eten%ies& As R""' L"--ers, a !or er Pri e Ginister o! the Nether&an's once remar(ed4 .I res#e%t s"-si'iarit.( As .o" 2now, !or the 7er ans, the wor' !or this is !e'era&is (D

Example o" in!ol!ement o" ?arliament The eneral !iew is that the Treaty o" Lis'on and the ?rotocol on the Role o" National ?arliaments in the E#ropean Union ,which will 'e annexed to the Treaty- wi&& enhan%e the ro&e o! nationa& #ar&ia ents in EU decision)ma(in & The Lis-on Treat. a2es n" ero"s re!eren%es to nationa& #ar&ia ents and introd#ces the "ollowin new pro!ision&

Arti%&e )> TEU National ?arliaments contri'#te acti!ely to the ood "#nctionin o" the Union4 o thro# h 'ein in"ormed 'y the instit#tions o" the Union and ha!in dra"t le islati!e acts o" the Union "orwarded to them in accordance with the ?rotocol on the role o" national ?arliaments in the E#ropean Union> o 'y seein to it that the principle o" s#'sidiarity is respected in accordance with the pro)ced#res pro!ided "or in the ?rotocol on the application o" the principles o" s#'sidiarity and proportionality> o 'y ta(in part, within the "ramewor( o" the area o" "reedom, sec#rity and $#stice, in the e!al#ation mechanisms "or the implementation o" the Union policies in that area C&&&D> o 'y ta(in part in the re!ision proced#res o" the Treaties C&&&D> o 'y 'ein noti"ied o" applications "or accession to the Union C&&&D> 'y ta(in part in the inter) parliamentary cooperation 'etween national ?arliaments and with the E#ropean

?arliament, in accordance with the ?rotocol on the role o" national ?arliaments in the E#ropean Union& @oreo!er, Art( A TEU an' Art( N; TFEU 'ea& with nationa& #ar&ia ents, ens"ring %o #&ian%e with s"-si'iarit. ,as we shall see-& These #rovisions !or a&i1e the right o! nationa& #ar&ia ents to -e invo&ve' in EU &aw6 a2ing& The Proto%o& see2s to en%o"rage /greater invo&ve ent o! nationa& Par&ia ents in the a%tivities o! the E"ro#ean Union and to enhance their a-i&it. to e+#ress their views on 'ra!t &egis&ative a%ts o! the E"ro#ean Union as well as on other matters which may 'e o" partic#lar interest to them&

It pro!ides that a&& Co ission %ons"&tation 'o%" ents "st -e !orwar'e' 'ire%t&. to nationa& #ar&ia ents "#on #"-&i%ation and it empowers national parliaments, !or the !irst ti e, to en!or%e s"-si'iarit. a%%or'ing to the !o&&owing #ro%ess(

8e&&ow %ar' #ro%e'"re6 0IK *omestic parliament can propose that the dra"t did not comply with s#'sidiarity, then Commission re) examine howe!er, Commission still can decide a ainst the o'$ection and #p to EU parliament and Co#ncil to decide The Lis-on Treat. intro'"%es new #ro%e'"res 2nown as the /.e&&ow an' orange %ar's0& Nationa& #ar&ia ents have eight wee2s ,rather than six, as #nder the Constit#tional Treaty- to st"'. 'ra!t EU &egis&ative a%ts& Any nationa& #ar&ia ent a. then 'e%i'e to !&ag a #ro#osa& ,that is, to express concerns- 'ire%t&. to the instit"tion that initiate' the #ro#osa& !or not %o #&.ing with the #rin%i#&e o! s"-si'iarit.& This cearly)warnin mechanism ,or yellow card- consists o" a two6ste# #ro%ess(

I! one thir' o! nationa& #ar&ia ents ,one 7#arter in the "ield o" "reedom, sec#rity, and $#stice%onsi'er that the #ro#osa& is not in &ine with s"-si'iarit., the Co ission wi&& have to re6 e+a ine it an' 'e%i'e whether to maintain, ad$#st, or withdraw it& The Co ission %an 'e%i'e to aintain its #ro#osa& against the o-9e%tions 'y the national parliaments& In that case, it wi&& have to e+#&ain its reasons, and it will 'e "# to the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent an' the Co"n%i& to 'e%i'e whether or not to contin#e the le isla%ti!e proced#re&

Orange %ar') stron er s#'sidiarity control) re7#ire hi her threshold to ma(e Commission to re)exam The .orange %ar'0 e%hanis is a stronger s"-si'iarit. %ontro& e%hanis that applies only to the ordinary le islati!e proced#re& A ain, it in!ol!es a two6ste# #ro%ess'#t this time nationa& #ar&ia ents re="ire a higher thresho&' 3a si #&e a9orit.4 'e"ore the Co ission %an -e o-&ige' to re6 e+a ine the proposal& The Co ission a. aintain it, -"t "st give reasons( I! the #ro#osa& is aintaine', the Co"n%i& an' E"ro#ean Par&ia ent "st, in a se%on' ste#, %onsi'er the #ro#osa& in li ht o" the s#'sidiarity principle 'e"ore the end o" the "irst readin & This step leads to the de"initi!e dismissal o" the proposal i" the Co#ncil ,'y a ma$ority o" HH per cent- or the E#ropean ?arliament ,'y a ma$ority o" !otes cast- "inds a ainst the proposal&

9ellow and +ran e mechanism act as warnin o" crisis o" con"idence "rom national parliament on important E#ropean iss#e Ho"se o! Co S%r"tin. Co ons E"ro#ean itteeB

Ew KO4 @emorand#m s#'mitted 'y Andrew *#"" SUER Spo(esman on Constit#tional A""airs, Alliance o" Li'erals and *emocrats "or E#rope ,AL*E C&& ,TDhere is a dan er that, in assessin the Treaty o" Lis'on, national parliaments 'ecome o'sessed 'y the early warnin mechanism on s#'sidiarity& It was #nderstood 'y those o" #s in!ol!ed in its dra"tin and, then, re)dra"tin that the mechanism, altho# h a necessary addition to the system o" o!ernance o" the Union, was not really intended to 'e #sed& It is, in /a ehot6s terms, more a di ni"ied part o" the E#ropean constit#tional settlement than an e""icient one&

+r, in other words, i" it were e!er necessary act#ally to 'e#&o. the e%hanis to -&o%2 a &egis&ative #ro#osa&, that 'e#&o. ent wo"&' signa& a %riti%a& !ai&"re o! the nor a& #ro%e'"res( We wo"&', in short, -e !a%ing a %risis o! %on!i'en%e in whi%h a a9orit. o! e 6-er state govern ents ha' &ost the s"##ort o! their nationa& #ar&ia ents on an i #ortant E"ro#ean iss"e, and in which the E#ropean Commission had not listened to warnin si nals "rom national parliaments at the earlier sta e o" proceedin s&

The principle o" s#'sidiarity has a respecta'le part to play in EU decision ma(in '#t its importance sho#ld not 'e exa erated& Instead, law ma(in at the EU le!el wo#ld pro"it "rom more re #lar dialo #e with national parliaments not on the pro'lematic iss#e o" s#'sidiarity '#t on the 7#ality or direction o" the act#al meas#re& @E?s hear many !iews a'o#t o#r le is)lati!e wor("rom trade, '#siness and pro"essional 'odies, NF+s, social partners and mem'er state and other o!ernments4 we hear little at the appropriate early phase o" le islation "rom the rele!ant committees o" national parliaments&

S#'sidiarity "oster the cooperation 'tw the nations state and EU, reason i!en 'y Commission to a ainst the o'$ection can challen ed 'e"ore ECE Aside "rom per"ormin the tas( o" instit#tional chec(s, promotin e""ecti!eness and addin s#'stanti!e !al#e to E#ropean le islation, onitoring the a##&i%ation o! the s"-si'iarit. #rin%i#&e has the a''itiona& si'e6e!!e%t o! !ostering a %oo#erative re&ationshi# -etween nationa& #ar&ia ents an' EU instit"tions, and a ong nationa& #ar&ia ents the se&ves( The #ro%ess is -est "n'erstoo' as an instit"tiona& 'ia&og"e4 the Co ission a. a!!ir , a en', or ann"& its #ro#osa& 3whi&e giving reasons4, and the nationa& #ar&ia ents a. %ha&&enge the reasons -e!ore the EC: i! the. %onsi'er the ina'e="ate& /#t #ltimately, the EU instit"tions have the !ina& sa. on the !ate o! the origina& #ro#osa&(

Altho# h national parliament can a ainst EU le islation '#t !otin threshold is hi h and Co#ncil and EU ?arliament has the last word In s#m, the Lis-on Treat. an' the Proto%o& %&ear&. enhan%e the visi-&e ro&e o! nationa& #ar&ia ents in the decision)ma(in process& Nationa& #ar&ia ents %an tor#e'o #ro#ose' EU &egis&ation on s"-si'iarit. gro"n's-"t the voting thresho&'s are high, and the !ina& 'e%ision &ies with the Co"n%i& an' the E"ro#ean Par&ia ent& Nationa& #ar&ia ents, there!ore, sti&& ran2 -e&ow the E"ro#ean instit"tions in the EU0s instit"tiona& #e%2ing or'er(

?arliament role still limited, the chan es is not new, less power"#l and only can challen ed on s#'sidiarity ro#nd /o danor4 These new instit#tional chan es mar( the "irst time that national parliaments are 'ein directly associated with the E#ropean policy process& Neverthe&ess, their i re ain &i ite'& #a%t a.

It needs, a'o!e all, to 'e as(ed whether national parliaments are in "act 'ein ranted a new and si ni"icant power thro# h the 6early warnin mechanism6& The #ower is not who&&. new sin%e nationa& #ar&ia ents were a&rea'. a-&e to o-9e%t in!or a&&. to EU &egis&ation thro"gh their s%r"tin. #ro%e'"res i" they wished to do so&

Nor is this #ower as signi!i%ant as it mi ht seem, since it is a #"re&. negative #ower& o Par&ia ents are on&. a-&e to e+#ress a 'issenting view, whi%h 'oes not even a o"nt to a veto& /#t national parliaments cannot 'e constr#cti!e actors 'y, "or example, placin new le islation on the a enda& 8#rthermore, as we ha!e seen, #ar&ia ents %an o-9e%t to &egis&ation on&. on the s#e%i!i% gro"n' o! s"-si'iarit.& 9et this see s to -e a %o #arative&. inor #ro-&e in EU #o&i%.6 a2ing, since c#rrent e!idence indicates that only a small proportion o" le islati!e proposals i!es rise to en#ine iss#es o" s#'sidiarity&

Increase role o" national parliament 'rin closer the citiGen since they more "amiliar with national parliament The principal ar #ment "or an in%rease' ro&e !or the nationa& #ar&ia ents in EU matters is that it wo#ld -ring the EU %&oser to the %iti1ens -. a2ing the #art o! the EU #ro%ess( A"ter all, %iti1ens are ore !a i&iar with their nationa& #ar&ia ent an' the iss"es 'is%"sse' there(

The mechanism still ine""icient) ?arliament not yet ready, diminish their le itimate capacity, lac( o" so#rces, short o" notices, too technical dra"tin , di""erent contri'#tions o" ?arliament to the process At the same time, nationa& #ar&ia ents a. not -e rea'. !or their new res#onsi-i&ities( Altho# h they ha!e adapted their str#ct#res and proced#res to (eep #p with the pace and scope o" E#ropean inte ration, these ste#s have not -een s"!!i%ient, whi%h 'i inishes their &egiti ating %a#a%it.( Some national parliaments 'o not have the reso"r%es to s%r"tini1e in depth and at short noti%e the %o #&i%ate' &egis&ative #ro#osa&s made 'y the Commission&

Dra!t E"ro#ean #ro#osa&s are o!ten high&. te%hni%a&, and s#ch detailed and metic#lo#s inspection is o"ten not the strong #oint o! a nationa& GP ,note that, in the United Lin dom, it is the non6 e&e%te' %ha -er, the Ho"se o! Lor's, whi%h has -een ore e!!e%tive at s%r"tin. than the 'e o%rati%a&&. e&e%te' Ho"se o! Co ons-& Also, the nationa& #ar&ia ents o! e -er states var. great&., and the. have their own "n'erstan'ing o! their ro&es an' #riorities& As a res#lt, their %ontri-"tion to the &egiti ating #ro%ess a. 'i!!er great&.& In other words, whi&e the EU has re%ogni1e' that nationa& #ar&ia ents "st #&a. a ore i #ortant ro&e in the "#t#re, -"t the e+tent o! that i #ortan%e wi&& 'e#en' %onsi'era-&. on the interna& #o&iti%a& an'

%onstit"tiona& sit"ation o" the mem'er states themsel!es&

Role o" ?arliament in EU also needed to 'e concerned "rom internal The ro&e that nationa& #ar&ia ents #&a. in EU a!!airs 'e#en's essentia&&. on three considerations4 o the %onstit"tiona& -a&an%e o! #ower insi'e the nationa& s.ste -etween #ar&ia ent an' govern ent> o o the nat"re o! #art. govern ent and the related iss#es o" the nat"re o! the #art. s.ste , and partic#larly interna& #art. re&ationshi#s> o and the extent to whi%h EU a!!airs are regar'e' as 'o esti% as o##ose' to !oreign a!!airs(

CONCLUDIN7 COGGENTS This chapter has e+a ine' the %onstit"tiona& !ra ewor2s thro"gh whi%h e+e%"tive !"n%tions o! the E"ro#ean Union are exercised and how it is held to acco#nt& To carry on explorin the E#ropean Union, t#rn to Cha#ter )>, which %onsi'ers &egis&ative !"n%tions re&ating to EU atters& To carry on explorin exec#ti!e "#nctions related to the UL o!ernment, t#rn to Chapter :, which loo(s at the #se o" prero ati!e powers&

You might also like