Task Based Language Teaching
Task Based Language Teaching
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:
Task Based Language Teaching first appeared in the vocational
training practices of the 1950s. Task focused here first derived from
training design concerns of the military regarding new military
technologies and occupational specialties of the period. Task analysis
initially focused on solo psychomotor tasks for which little
communication or collaboration was involved. In task analysis, on-the-
job, largely manual tasks were translated into training tasks. However,
task analysis dealt with solo job performance on manual tasks, attention
then turned to team tasks, for which communication is required.
APPROACH:
Task Based Language Teaching refers to an approach based on the
use of tasks as the core unit of planning and instruction in language
teaching. TBLT proposes the notion of “task” as a central unit of planning
and teaching. A task is an activity or goal that is carried out using
language, such as finding the solution to a puzzle, reading a map and
giving directions, making a telephone call, writing a letter, or reading a
set of instructions and assembling a toy. “Tasks generally bear some
resemblance to real life language use”(Skehan 1996). Some of its
proponents present it as a logical development of Communicative
Language Teaching since it draws on several principles that formed part
of the communicative language teaching movement in 1980s. For
example:
Activities that involve real communication are essential for
language learning.
TBLT-Anastasia Yannakouli
Long and Crookes in 1991 claim that “tasks provide a vehicle for
the presentation of appropriate target language samples to learners and
for the delivery of comprehension and production opportunities of
negotiable difficulty”.
OBJECTIVES:
There are few published examples of complete language programs
that claim to be fully based on most recent formulations of TBLT. The
literature contains mainly descriptions of examples of task-based
activities. However, as with other communicative approaches, goals in
TBLT are ideally to be determined by the specific needs of particular
learners. “Selection of tasks should be base on a careful analysis of the
real-world needs of learners” (Crookes 1993).
TBLT-Anastasia Yannakouli
SYLLABUS:
Nunan (1989) suggests that a syllabus might specify two types of tasks:
I. Real-world tasks, which are designed to practice or rehearse those
tasks that are found to be important in a needs analysis and turn out
to be important and useful in the real world.
II. Pedagogic tasks, which have a psycholinguistic basis in SLA
theory and research but do not necessarily, reflect real-world tasks.
THE LEARNER:
• Group participant
• Monitor
• Risk-taker and innovator
THE TEACHER:
• A central role of the teacher is in selecting the tasks himself and
then forming these into an instructional sequence in keeping with
learner needs, interests and language skill level.
• Preparing learners for tasks with introductions, instructions and
demonstration of task procedures.
• Consciousness raising by using a variety of form-focusing
techniques, including attention-focusing pretask activities, text
exploration, guided exposure to parallel tasks and use of
highlighted material.
MATERIALS:
Instructional materials play an important role in TBLT because it is
dependent on a sufficient supply of appropriate classroom tasks, some of
which may require considerable time, ingenuity, and resources to
develop. Materials that can be exploited for instruction in TBLT are
limited only by the imagination of the task designer. TBLT favor the use
of authentic tasks supported by authentic materials wherever possible.
For example: newspapers, television, Internet, etc.
TECHNIQUES:
• Jigsaw tasks
• Information-gap tasks
• Problem-solving tasks
• Decision-making tasks
TBLT-Anastasia Yannakouli
ADVANTAGES:
DISADVANTAGES:
• “The role of instruction is variable and unclear, grading is difficult,
and they do not fit well with an exam context” (J. Cosh 1997).
CONCLUSION:
Tasks have long been part of the mainstream repertoire of language
teaching techniques for teachers of many different methodological
persuasions. TBLT, however, offers a different rationale for the use of
tasks as well as different criteria for the design and use of tasks. And the
basic assumption of Task-Based Language Teaching is that it provides for
a more effective basis for teaching than other language teaching
approaches and it remains in the domain of ideology rather than fact.