Scribd
Upload
20 views

2009 Highway Mobility Report

This document is a 2009 highway mobility report staff draft from June 2009. It contains 8 tables that provide data on congested intersections in the county from 2009 and comparisons to 2006 data, including the most congested intersections, intersections that decreased or increased in congestion level by over 15%, and peak traffic volumes. It also includes tables with data on pedestrian crossing volumes and comparisons of model results from 2005 to projected 2013 model results for both freeway and non-freeway facilities county-wide.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
20 views

2009 Highway Mobility Report

This document is a 2009 highway mobility report staff draft from June 2009. It contains 8 tables that provide data on congested intersections in the county from 2009 and comparisons to 2006 data, including the most congested intersections, intersections that decreased or increased in congestion level by over 15%, and peak traffic volumes. It also includes tables with data on pedestrian crossing volumes and comparisons of model results from 2005 to projected 2013 model results for both freeway and non-freeway facilities county-wide.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

2009 Highway Mobility Report 

Staff Draft ‐ June 2009 
 
 

List of Tables:  
Table: 2.1: LATR Congestion Standards                11 
Table 2.2: Most Congested Intersections for 2009            12 
Table 2.3: Intersections with CLV Ranked 11‐30              15 
Table 2.4: Intersections with CLV Ranked 31‐65              16 
Table 2.5: Intersections with a Decrease in CLV greater than 15% Between 2006 and 2009  17 
Table 2.6: Intersections with an Increase in the CLV of more than 15% Between 2006 and 2009  18 
Table 2.7: PM Peak Volume Analysis                20 
Table 2.8: Arterial Mobility Measures for Priority Corridors          24 
Table 3.1: Total (AM + PM) Peak Period Observed Pedestrian Crossing Volumes      51 
Table 4.1: Comparison of County‐wide 2005 and 2013 TRAVEL/3 Model Results      60 
Table 4.2: Comparison of 2005 and 2013 TRAVEL/3 Model Results – Non‐freeway  
vs. Freeway Facilities                     61 
 
    

Page | 4  

You might also like