Appendix 5: Financing: White Flint Sector Plan Appendix Appendix 5
Appendix 5: Financing: White Flint Sector Plan Appendix Appendix 5
Staff presented the following four documents to the Planning Board as part of their worksessions following the
public hearing:
Purpose of TIF
In the absence of government participation in the development or redevelopment of urban areas, real
estate developers and investors are more willing to invest in simpler, “Green field” sites. In “Green field”
sites land costs are generally lower, redevelopment requires less land assemblage, public facility capacity is
less encumbered by existing development, and infrastructure investments are less likely to involve expensive
retrofits.
Under certain circumstances, TIF can serve as an effective tool for jurisdic¬tions seeking to fund
redevelopment of targeted geographic areas, espe¬cially those that contain “Brownfield” or “Grayfield” sites.
As such, state and local officials in jurisdictions around the nation recognize that TIF can be a valuable tool in
suburban transit-oriented development (TOD) projects as a way of meeting the high costs of retrofitting aging
or obsolete suburban infrastructure.
TIF in Maryland
The Maryland Tax Increment Financing Act authorizes most Maryland coun¬ties and municipalities to use TIF
for the purposes of financing certain develop¬ment/redevelopment projects. See Title 12, Subtitle 2 of the
Economic Development Article of the Maryland Code, Sections 12-201 through 12-213.
In Maryland, authorized local governments may issue TIF bonds for the purpose of financing development
or infrastructure to support development. The first step in that process requires the government to create a
TIF District and a special fund. The TIF bonds issued are then payable from the special fund which holds the
incre¬mental tax payments associated with the TIF District.
Recent TIF Districts in Maryland have been “backed” by Special Assessment districts. In these cases, a
Special Assessment District is created that has the same boundaries as the TIF District. In the event that the TIF
District does not meet projected revenues, property owners within the TIF District are assessed a share of the
shortfall.
In order to reduce risk, bond placement agencies often prefer to see TIF Districts that are large and diverse,
thereby reducing the risk of default. Larger districts raise questions as to why the TIF District is so large as to
include areas that receive little benefit from the new development.
Smaller and more narrowly drawn TIF Districts usually require higher debt coverage ratios (i.e. a lower
percentage of net operating income can be used for debt payment because the small TIF district is perceived
to be riskier). For example, a project that will generate an annual tax increment of $1 million might have a
large TIF District boundary and a debt coverage ratio of 1.25 (i.e. $800,000 available each year for principal
and interest); the same project with a more narrowly drawn TIF District boundary might have a debt coverage
ratio of 1.67 (i.e. $600,000 available each year for principal and interest).
124 White Flint Sector Plan Appendix Appendix 5