Discovered The Nine Investing Secrets of Warren Buffet
Discovered The Nine Investing Secrets of Warren Buffet
Discovered The Nine Investing Secrets of Warren Buffet
"After only a few days, we came to the conclusion that we could have saved a lot of our clients money if we used these methods.
Ron Boer, Managing Director, Asset Management, The Netherlands
THE BUFFETT CRITERIA FOR GREAT COMPANIES. HOW YOU CAN CUT PAINSTAKING RESEARCH DOWN FROM MONTHS TO JUST MINUTES.
INDEPENDENTLY AUDITED PERFORMANCE FIGURES OF MY OWN PORTFOLIO SHOWING HOW IT RETURNED AN AVERAGE OF 19.45% PER YEAR COMPARED TO 2.82% PER YEAR FOR THE S&P 500 BETWEEN JUNE 1997 AND NOVEMBER 2003.1
HOW A STUDY BY ED KELLY OF TRINITY COLLEGE, IRELAND, REVEALED A 10-YEAR AVERAGE RETURN OF 17.3% PER YEAR COMPARED WITH 10.22% PER YEAR FOR THE S&P 500 OVER THE SAME PERIOD.
HOW THIS PORTFOLIO TOOK LESS THAN 90 SECONDS TO OBTAIN USING MY SYSTEM, AND HOW, ONCE PURCHASED, NO MORE TRANSACTIONS WERE CARRIED OUT FOR THE NEXT TEN YEARS.
HOW INVESTORS AROUND THE WORLD ARE DISCOVERING MY SIMPLE TOOLS THAT ARE MAKING BUFFET-STYLE INVESTING COMPLETELY STRAIGHTFORWARD. THE ULTIMATE ADVICE FILTER TO GIVE YOU JUST THE VERY BEST IDEAS AND ELIMINATE THE GLITTER STOCKS SO OFTEN PROMOTED BY THE MEDIA. HOW TO IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES SO CLEARLY AND CONVINCINGLY THAT YOULL BE CONFIDENT AND COMFORTABLE WITH EVERY INVESTMENT DECISION YOU MAKE.
IN
THEN THERE ARE OTHERS WHO DELIBERATELY DO NOT WANT TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY. THEY WANT TO STUDY THE PURE
MOVEMENT OF THE STOCK PRICE WITH THE BELIEF THAT THEY CAN USE THIS INFORMATION TO MAKE FORECASTS ABOUT THE FUTURE MOVEMENTS OF THE PRICE. WARREN BUFFETT REFERS TO THIS AS TRYING TO PLAY BRIDGE WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE CARDS.
IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE TO IGNORE THE FACT THAT THE STOCK SYMBOL IS ATTACHED TO A COMPANY. AND IT MAKES NO SENSE NOT TO APPLY SOUND BUSINESS PRINCIPLES TO ANALYZE THESE COMPANIES. THE MORE WE KNOW ABOUT THE COMPANY, THEN THE MORE CONFIDENT WE CAN BE ABOUT THE PRICE OF THE STOCK. NOT ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS, BUT OVER TIME.
WHEN I BUY A STOCK, WARREN BUFFETT SAID, I THINK OF IT IN TERMS OF BUYING A WHOLE COMPANY, JUST AS IF I WERE BUYING A STORE DOWN THE STREET. IF YOU WERE BUYING A STORE YOU WOULD WANT TO KNOW ALL ABOUT IT. WHAT WERE ITS PRODUCTS? HOW CONSISTENT ARE THE SALES? DO THEY KEEP TRYING NEW PRODUCTS OR DO THEIR PRODUCTS STAY FAIRLY CONSTANT? WHAT COMPETITORS DOES THE STORE HAVE AND WHAT DISTINGUISHES IT FROM THEM? WHAT WOULD BE THE MOST WORRYING THING ABOUT OWNING SUCH A STORE? THIS LEADS TO THE IDEA OF LOOKING FOR COMPANIES THAT HAVE A STRONG AND DURABLE ECONOMIC MOAT. JUST AS CASTLES HAVE MOATS TO PROTECT THEM FROM INVADERS, SO COMPANIES CAN HAVE ECONOMIC MOATS TO PROTECT THEM FROM CHALLENGES OF COMPETITORS AND CHANGES IN CONSUMER PREFERENCES. THE MOAT CAN BE MADE UP OF ATTRIBUTES SUCH AS BRAND NAME, GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION OR PATENTS AND LICENCES. ALL THESE PRINCIPLES ABOUT PURCHASING BUSINESSES ARE EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO PURCHASING SHARES. IT BECOMES ONE OF THE MOST ENJOYABLE PARTS OF INVESTING TO LOOK INTO THE BUSINESS ASPECTS OF ANY COMPANY THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERING ADDING TO YOUR PORTFOLIO.
THIS GRAPH IS OF THE EARNINGS PER SHARE OF A COMPANY. IF YOU WERE BUYING A COMPANY, THIS IS JUST WHAT YOU WOULD WANT A COMPANY WHOSE EARNINGS AND SALES GO UP LIKE CLOCKWORK BY 15 OR 20 PERCENT OR MORE EACH YEAR. IT IS NO DIFFERENT WHEN YOU INVEST IN COMPANIES VIA THE STOCK MARKET.
IN FACT, THE ABOVE TWO GRAPHS OF THE SAME COMPANY, ARB CORPORATION. THIS IS AN AUSTRALIAN COMPANY THAT MANUFACTURES AND SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT FOR OFF-ROAD AND FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES AROUND THE WORLD. THE FIRST CHART
DEPICTS THE CLOSING PRICES WHILE THE SECOND CHART DISPLAYS THE EARNINGS PER SHARE OVER THE SAME PERIOD.
WHEN WE PUT THE TWO CHARTS TOGETHER, WE SEE HOW THEY TRACK EACH OTHER. SOMETIMES THE PRICE MOVES AHEAD OF THE EARNINGS PER SHARE AND SOMETIMES IT IS THE OTHER WAY AROUND. BUT OVER TIME THEY MOVE TOGETHER CLEARLY IT IS AN ADVANTAGE TO BE ABLE TO FIND COMPANIES WITH SUCH STEADY AND STRONG GROWTH IN EARNINGS. WHEN WE LOCATE SUCH COMPANIES, WE ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO FINDING QUALITY INVESTMENTS. WHEN WE LOCATE SUCH COMPANIES, WE ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO FINDING QUALITY INVESTMENTS. IN THE CASE OF ARB, A SIMPLE BUY AND HOLD INVESTMENT OF $10,000 IN ARB CORPORATION IN 1994 WOULD NOW BE WORTH OVER $200,000 TEN YEARS LATER. THIS BRINGS US TO WHAT WARREN BUFFETT SAID A FEW YEARS BACK, IF YOU ARENT WILLING TO OWN A STOCK FOR TEN YEARS, DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT OWNING IT FOR TEN MINUTES.
HE CONTINUED, PUT TOGETHER A PORTFOLIO OF COMPANIES WHOSE AGGREGATE EARNINGS MARCH UPWARDS OVER THE YEARS, AND SO WILL THE PORTFOLIOS MARKET VALUE.
IN OTHER WORDS, AS INVESTORS WE FOCUS ON THE MEDIUM TO LONG TERM BUSINESS CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPANIES. IT IS THESE THAT DRIVE THE SHARE PRICE. FOCUSING ON THE SHORT-TERM ASPECTS OF A COMPANY INCLUDING BOTH BUSINESS AND PRICE FLUCTUATIONS IS FOOLISH AS BUFFETT HAS SAID. MOST OF OUR LARGE STOCK POSITIONS ARE GOING TO BE HELD FOR MANY YEARS, AND THE SCORECARD ON
OUR INVESTMENT DECISIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY BUSINESS RESULTS OVER THAT PERIOD, NOT BY PRICES ON ANY GIVEN DAY.
EVEN THOUGH WE FOCUS ON THE LONG-TERM, THE INVESTMENT IS EVEN MORE PROFITABLE IF WE PURCHASE THE STOCK DURING ONE OF ITS DROPS. BUFFETT HAS SAID THAT EVEN FOR THE BEST OF COMPANIES, YOU CAN STILL PAY TOO MUCH.
EVEN THOUGH BUFFETTS AIM IS TO HOLD SHARES FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE, WHEN THE PROFIT IS THERE, AND THE SHARE PRICE HAS OUTPACED THE VALUE OF THE UNDERLYING BUSINESS, THEN HE SOMETIMES TAKES IT.
MANY COMPANIES CONSISTENTLY LOSE MONEY YEAR AFTER YEAR. SO THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE AN ROE OR ROC. OTHERS HAVE VERY LOW VALUES FOR THESE RATIOS. IN OTHER WORDS, MANAGEMENT IS STRUGGLING TO MAKE A PROFITABLE USE OF WHAT IT HAS. CLEARLY, THESE ARE NOT THE SORT OF COMPANIES THAT WE SHOULD THINK OF AS QUALITY INVESTMENTS. IF MANAGEMENT IS ONLY MAKING A FEW PERCENT ON THE MONEY THAT IT HAS, THEN OVER TIME THIS IS ALL YOU CAN EXPECT TO MAKE IF YOU PURCHASE SHARES IN THE COMPANY. AFTER ALL, MONEY CANT COME FROM NOWHERE. EVERY YEAR, WARREN BUFFETT WRITES IN THE ANNUAL REPORT OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY THAT HE IS EAGER TO HEAR ABOUT BUSINESSES THAT, AMONGST OTHER THINGS, ARE EARNING GOOD RETURNS ON EQUITY WHILE EMPLOYING LITTLE OR NO DEBT. THIS MEANS THAT ROE AND ROC ARE ESSENTIALLY THE SAME. IT MAKES SENSE. IF YOU WANT A HEALTHY RETURN ON ANY SHARES THAT YOU PURCHASE, AT THE VERY LEAST YOU NEED TO SELECT COMPANIES WITH MANAGEMENT THAT IS MAKING A HEALTHY RETURN ON THE MONEY THAT THEY HAVE.
T HERE ARE MANY THOUSANDS OF STOCKS TO CHOOSE FROM: IN THE USA OVER 10,000 STOCKS, IN CANADA OVER 3000 AND IN AUSTRALIA OVER 1,500. FACED WITH THESE MASSIVE NUMBERS AND THE ASSOCIATED DELUGE OF INFORMATION, INVESTORS GET DRAWN TO WHAT I CALL GLITTER STOCKS. THESE ARE STOCKS THAT HAVE SOME ATTENTION GRABBING ACTIVITY SUCH AS HIGH TRADING VOLUME, EXTREME MOVEMENTS IN THE PRICE WHETHER UP OR DOWN, OR WHEN THE STOCKS ARE IN THE NEWS. EVEN WITH THE BEST OF INTENTIONS, IT IS HARD TO LOOK AT THESE STOCKS IN A CLEAR AND OBJECTIVE MANNER COMPARED TO THE REMAINING STOCKS. WARREN BUFFETT WAS SO AWARE OF THIS THAT HE MOVED FROM NEW YORK BACK TO HIS HOME TOWN, OMAHA, NEBRASKA. REGARDING THE BENEFITS OF LIVING IN OMAHA, HE SAID, I THINK ITS A SANER EXISTENCE HERE. I USED TO FEEL, WHEN I WORKED BACK IN NEW YORK, THAT THERE WERE MORE STIMULI JUST HITTING ME ALL THE TIME IT MAY LEAD TO CRAZY BEHAVIOR AFTER A WHILE. HE ENDED BY STATING THAT IT IS MUCH EASIER TO THINK IN OMAHA. A RESEARCH STUDY BY BRAD BARBER AND TERRENCE ODEAN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DEMONSTRATES VERY CLEARLY THE PENALTY TO BE PAID BY GETTING DRAWN INTO GLITTER STOCKS.
THEY FOUND THAT, ON AVERAGE, INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS TENDED TO INVEST IN GLITTER STOCKS MORE THAN PROFESSIONALS. SECONDLY, THEY FOUND THAT BY DOING THIS THEY UNDERPERFORMED THE MARKET BY ANYTHING FROM AROUND 2.8 PERCENT TO 7.8 PERCENT PER ANNUM.
BUFFETT HAS LONG UNDERSTOOD THIS. FOR EXAMPLE, BACK IN 1985 HE SAID, MOST PEOPLE GET INTERESTED IN STOCKS WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS. THE TIME TO GET INTERESTED IS WHEN NO ONE ELSE IS. YOU CANT BUY WHAT IS POPULAR AND DO WELL.
BUT THERE ARE PROBLEMS. TO BE ABLE TO DO THIS EFFECTIVELY WE NEED TO MASTER THREE STEPS. BEFORE OUTLINING THESE STEPS, TO KEEP BUFFETTS ANALOGY RUNNING, LETS DESCRIBE WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO AS LOOKING FOR HOME-RUN STOCKS. THESE ARE THE STOCKS WITH THE HIGHEST CHANCE OF BEING SUCCESSFUL AND MAKING YOU MONEY YEAR AFTER YEAR.
THE FIRST STEP TO MASTER IS TO BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE A HOME-RUN STOCK. AS WE HAVE SEEN, THEY ARE NOT GLITTER STOCKS THAT HAVE APPEARED ON THE FRONT
COVER OF AN INVESTMENT MAGAZINE OR RECOMMENDED BY A POPULAR SHARE MARKET COMMENTATOR. NOR ARE THEY STOCKS THAT HAVE A TRADER PRICE PATTERN OF BREAKOUTS, DOUBLE BOTTOMS, OR CANDLE-STICK TREND REVERSALS.
THE SECOND IS TO KNOW WHAT TO DO WHEN A HOME-RUN STOCK COMES ALONG. BUFFETT HAS SAID WHEN EVERYTHING MEETS YOUR CRITERIA OF IT BEING A GREAT BUSINESS AT A FAIR PRICE, THEN BUY A MEANINGFUL AMOUNT OF THE STOCK. OF COURCE, THIS MEANS THAT YOU CAN ONLY HOLD A SMALL NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN YOUR PORTFOLIO. THE EXTREME EXPONENT OF ONLY HOLDING A SMALL NUMBER OF STOCKS WAS PHIL FISHER. FOR FISHER, ANYTHING OVER SIX WAS TOO MANY. THE MORE STOCKS YOU HOLD, THE MORE LIKELY YOUR RETURNS WILL BE AVERAGE
AND THE MORE TIME YOU WILL HAVE TO SPEND KEEPING TRACK OF THE STOCKS IN YOUR PORTFOLIO. YOU ALSO ADD CONSIDERABLE RISK BECAUSE YOU CANT STUDY THEM PROPERLY. THE THIRD STEP CONCERNS KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE. YOU NEED THE KNOWLEDGE TO KNOW APPROXIMATELY HOW OFTEN A HOME RUN STOCK COMES ALONG. YOU WONT MAKE THE INVESTORS HALL OF FAME IF YOUR CRITERIA ARE SET SO HIGH THAT YOU ONLY GET TO SWING EVERY OTHER DECADE. ON
THE OTHER HAND, IF THEY ARE SET TOO LOW THEN, WELL, THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO GIVE YOU THE OUTCOME THAT YOU DESIRE. YOU ALSO NEED TO HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO WAIT. OUR ASPIRING HALL OF FAMER HAS TO RESIST BEING SUCKERED IN TO SWINGING AT PITCHES THAT DONT MEET THE CRITERIA
SECRET #7: CALCULATE HOW MUCH MONEY YOU WILL MAKE, NOT
WHETHER THE STOCK IS UNDERVALUED OR OVERVALUED ACCORDING TO SOME ACADEMIC MODEL.
A S AN INVESTOR WHAT IS THE RIGHT QUESTION TO ASK? MOST ASK WHETHER THE STOCK IS UNDERVALUED OR OVERVALUED. THE PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THAT THERE IS NO WAY OF PROPERLY DETERMINING WHETHER A STOCK IS, IN FACT, UNDERVALUED OR OVERVALUED. THERE ARE VARIOUS ACADEMIC MODELS FOR CALCULATING WHAT IS CALLED THE INTRINSIC VALUE OF A STOCK. FROM MY EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE AS A RESEARCH MATHEMATICIAN ALL THESE MODELS, REFERRED TO AS DISCOUNT CASH FLOW MODELS, ARE FATALLY FLAWED. THERE ARE FOUR AREAS THAT BRING THEM DOWN. THEY ARE THEORETICAL, CONTRADICTORY, UNSTABLE AND UNTESTABLE. THESE PROBLEMS ARE A RATHER TECHNICAL TO EXPLAIN FULLY SO I WILL ONLY GIVE THE GENERAL IDEAS BEHIND THEM. JUST BECAUSE SOME THEORETICAL FORMULA
LABELS A STOCK AS UNDERVALUED DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE MONEY FROM IT. FOR EXAMPLE, PERHAPS THE PRICE WILL STAY AT THAT LEVEL. THE MODELS ARE CONTRADICTORY SINCE DIFFERENT VALUES ARE OBTAINED DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THE MANY VARIATIONS OF THE MODELS THAT YOU USE.
THEY ARE UNSTABLE SINCE INSIGNIFICANTLY SMALL CHANGES IN THE INPUT VARIABLES LEAD TO CHANGES OF 100 PERCENT OR MORE IN THE INTRINSIC VALUE. THIS MEANS THAT IN INSTEAD OF THE MODELS BEING OBJECTIVE, THEY CAN LEAD TO ALMOST ANY OUTPUT THAT IS DESIRED. AND FINALLY THE MODELS ARE IMPRACTICAL BECAUSE THEY ARE UNTESTABLE. SOME
OF THE INPUT VARIABLES REQUIRE VERIFICATION OVER AN INFINITE NUMBER OF YEARS. FOR EXAMPLE, FORECASTS OF GROWTH RATES HAVE TO BE MADE OVER NOT JUST FIVE OR TEN YEARS, BUT EXTENDING OUT FOREVER.
REPORTING IN THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, HE FOUND THAT PEOPLE TENDED TO TRADE OUT OF WINNERS INTO STOCKS THAT PERFORMED LESS WELL. IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION, THE STUDY SHOWED THAT THE LOSERS IN THEIR PORTFOLIO TENDED TO CONTINUE TO UNDERPERFORM. IT WAS REALLY THE CASE THAT ONCE A LOSER, ALWAYS A LOSER . OVERALL HE FOUND THAT PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER TO SELL THEIR LOSERS AND KEEP THEIR WINNERS. INSTEAD, THEY DID THE OPPOSITE, NAMELY KEEP THEIR
LOSERS AND SELL THEIR WINNERS
. SUPPOSE TWO SIMPLE CHANGES WERE MADE: THE INVESTORS SOLD THEIR LOSERS AND HELD ON TO THEIR WINNERS. ON AVERAGE, THE STUDY SHOWED THAT THEIR
AVERAGE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE WOULD HAVE GONE UP BY ALMOST FIVE PERCENT PER YEAR.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO STRATEGIES IS EVEN MORE MARKED WHEN TAXES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. WHEN YOU CLAIM A LOSS YOU ARE GETTING A TAX
REBATE AND SO YOU WANT THIS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE . IN CONTRAST, WITH A PROFIT YOU ARE PAYING TAX SO YOU WANT TO DELAY THIS AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. BUT, AS WE JUST LEARNED, THE AVERAGE INVESTOR TENDS TO TAKE PROFITS EARLY AND LOSSES LATE ENDING UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE TAXMAN.
AS THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN TO AN ANNUAL MEETING OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY WILL KNOW, BUFFETT GETS GREAT PLEASURE FROM USING AND TALKING ABOUT THE
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF THE COMPANIES THAT HE INVESTS IN OR OWNS
WHEN YOU DO THIS INVESTING BECOMES EASIER AND MORE FUN. YOU DONT HAVE
THE WORRY OF HAVING YOUR MONEY TIED UP WITH ENTERPRISES THAT YOU KNOW LITTLE ABOUT. ALSO YOU WILL BECOME A MORE ASTUTE INVESTOR SINCE YOU ARE PICKING UP SIGNALS ABOUT THE ECONOMICS OF COMPANIES LONG BEFORE THEY SHOW UP IN ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
As a program, Conscious Investor is excellent, but as a philosophy, it is even better. It is a living investment philosophy, instead of just a software tool. Bob Sykes, United Kingdom