Presentation to Construction Project Management Conference Reviewing the OGCs Achieving Excellence Guidance
18 February 2010 Jon de Souza
Our purpose is to
Improve industry performance
The outcome will be
A demonstrably better built environment
1994
1998
2001
2003
2005
2006
DBF
CRISP
National Platform
The Egan Decade
The Egan vision for change
5 - Key Drivers for Change
Committed leadership
Product
4 - Key Project Processes
Partnering the supply chain
7 - Targets for Improvement
Capital cost Construction time Predictability Defects
-10% -10% +20% -20% -20% +10% +10%
Focus on the customer Product Team Integration Quality driven agenda Commitment to people
development
Project implementation
Production of components
Accidents Productivity Turnover & profits
UK Construction Key Performance Indicators A Measured Approach
Economic Client satisfaction
Product and service
Defects Predictability
Cost and Time
Profitability Productivity Safety Construction Cost Construction Time
Egan comparisons
(2000 2008)
Egan Target
Target Construction cost Construction time
-10% -10%
2008
Actual 4% 8% 49% 45% 73% 865 46k 9.6% %
+0.5% +1% 0% +6% -2% -5% +7% +10%
-57% -57% 100% 100% 100% 213 58k 9.4%
Predictability cost +20% Predictability time +20% Defects Accidents Productivity Profit
-20% -20% +10% +10%
Never Waste a Good Crisis
Or A little less conversation, a lot more action please
Never Waste a Good Crisis
Review of progress since Egan The review asked... Is the agenda still relevant? Barriers to progress identified Business and Economic Models Capability Delivery Model Industry Structure
100
150
200
250
50
0
Client C lie n tS a tSatisfaction P ro d u ct Product Client C le n tS a tSatisfaction S e rvice Service Defects Impact at D e fe cts Handover
CE 2009
Predictability P ro je ct 1 Cost
P re d C o st-
Economic KPIs
Predictability P ro je ct 1 Time
P re d T im e -
Industry 2009 = 100
P ro fita b ility 2 Profitability
P ro d (C u rre n t) (Current
Productivity Values)
Demonstration v Industry 2009
P ro d (C o n sta n t) Productivity
(Constant 3 2000 Values)
Demonstration v Industry 2009
CE 2009 Industry 2009 = 100
People and Environment KPIs
450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Safety Overall
Saf et yOverall 4
Safety - All Projects
Saf et y-A ll p ro ject s 4
Emp Sat
St af f T/ O
Q&S
EnvImp -
EnvImp -
Employee Staff Turnover - Qualifications & Skills Satisfaction All Projects
Pro d uct Pro cess Environmental Environmental Impact Impact Product Construction Process
2009 Demonstrations outperform the industry by an average of 80%
OGC guidance
Achieving Excellence in Construction (AEC):
Initially drafted in 2002 Guidance to public sector clients on how to better procure and deliver construction Promoting the lessons of the Egan/improvement agendas Initial OGC review of the Guidance in 2008 Constructing Excellence engaged in March 2009 to lead process of redrafting and updating of this Guidance
OGC guidance
Achieving Excellence in Construction (AEC):
1. Initiative into Action 2. Project Organisation 3. Project Procurement Lifecycle 4. Risk and Value Management 5. The Integrated Project Team 6. Procurement and Contract Strategies 7. Whole-Life costing 8. Improving performance 9. Design Quality 10.Health and Safety 11.Sustainability
OGC guidance review
What we did
Initial discussions with OGC regarding expectations for review Initial review of existing guidance with key stakeholders Determining new structure for guidance Rewriting of guidance Identification of new case studies for amended content Second consultation with wider stakeholder group
OGC guidance review
Initial conclusions
The industry (and client knowledge) had moved on substantially since the guidance was first drafted especially in:
Sustainability Health and safety
The refreshed guidance should align with other industry targets and best practice But retain existing headings as these have become well known across the public sector
Construction Commitments and Strategic Forum targets to 2012
Procurement and integration Commitment to people Client leadership Design quality Sustainability Health and safety
The Clients Commitments
OGC guidance review
Outcomes
Refreshed guidance aligned with the Construction and Client Commitments New case studies Areas considered in more depth within the guidance:
Collaborative procurement Resource efficiency Client health and safety responsibility (CDM2007) Building Information Modelling Use of lean techniques
Guidance designed to add value to both frequent informed and occasional clients and their supply chains
Influencing behaviour of construction clients
Frequent
Intelligent Clients
Occasional Inexperienced Experienced
OGC guidance review
Key lessons
Acceptance within OGC that traditional lowest cost procurement does not provide best value More work needs to be done to promote fair payment practices down the supply chain While some Government clients are excellent procurers of construction, others still resort to lowest cost tendering There should be a method for assessing Government client performance
Economic climate change
Revert to type Long tender lists Lowest tender price Claims Cost and time overruns Abandon sustainability Shed people
No turning back Best value/real value Collaborative working Target price plus lean Delivery to all KPI targets Sustainability remains key driver Retain good people however possible
Maturity matrix
Developed from NAO maturity matrix 55 questions with 4 levels of maturity under the 6 headings of the Construction Commitments:
Client Leadership Procurement and Integration Design Quality Commitment to People Sustainability Health and safety
Applicable to different roles
Funders, procurers, deliverers Centralised vs. devolved Departments End users and suppliers able to provide views too
St Francis of Assisi Academy, Liverpool Green values help academy top new league table
A school which offers its pupils a green-focused education has won plaudits for having the best teaching standards in the country. The Independent, 11 Jan 2007
The excellent GCSE results and the fact that our students finished top of the national league tables for progress can rightly be attributed to the impact the building had on their studies
BDP
Thank you for listening !
[email protected]