Flow Over Immersed Bodies
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
We consider flows over bodies that are immersed in a fluid and the flows are termed external flows. We are interested in the fluid force (lift and drag) over the bodies. For example, correct design of cars, trucks, ships, and airplanes, etc. can greatly decrease the fuel consumption and improve the handling characteristics of the vehicle.
A body immersed in a moving fluid experiences a resultant force due to the interaction between the body and the fluid surrounding it. Object and flow relation: stationary air with moving object or flowing air with stationary object Flow classification:
Figure 9.2
Flow classification: (a) two-dimensional, (b) axisymmetric, (c) three-dimensional.
When any body moves through a fluid, an interaction between the body and the fluid occurs This can be described in terms of the stresses-wall shear stresses due to viscous effect and normal stresses due to the pressure P
Drag, D the resultant force in the direction of the upstream velocity Lift, L the resultant force normal to the upstream velocity
Resultant force
Drag and lift due to pressure and friction: example of an air foil
For typical external flows the most important of parameters are the Reynolds number the Mach number
Ul Re =
Ma = U c
gl
Flows with Re>100 are dominated by inertia effects, whereas flows with Re<1 are dominated by viscous effects.
Figure 9.5
Character of the steady, viscous flow past a flat plate parallel to the upstream velocity: (a) low Reynolds number flow, (b) moderate Reynolds number flow, (c) large Reynolds number flow.
The velocity gradients within the boundary layer and wake regions are much larger than those in the remainder of the flow fluid. Therefore, viscous effects are confined to the boundary layer and wake regions.
Figure 9.7
Distortion of a fluid particle as it flows within the boundary layer.
=y where u=0.99U
Transition occurs at
Re xcr =
Ux = 2 105 ~ 3 106
Figure 9.9
Typical characteristics of boundary layer thickness and wall shear stress for laminar and turbulent boundary layers.
(U u ) bdy
0
u = 1 U 0
dy
(9.3)
Represents the amount that the thickness of the body must be increased so that the fictitious uniform inviscid flow has the same mass flow rate properties as the actual viscous flow. It represents the outward displacement of the streamlines caused by the viscous effects on the plate.
Ex 9.3 Determine the velocity U=U(x) of the air within the duct
but outside of the boundary layer with * = 0.004( x)1 2
u U 0
u 1 U
dy
(9.4)
The Navier-Stokes equations are too complicated that no analytical solution is available. However, for large Re, simplified boundary layer equations can be derived.
The boundary layer assumption is based on the fact that the boundary layer is thin.
<< x so that v << u and
Thus the equations become, u v + =0 x y 1 p u u u u +v = + 2 x x y y
2
<< x y
(9.8)
parabolic equation
Detailed derivation is given in Cengel & Cimbala, Fluid Mechanics, 2006, pp. 516-519.
(9.9)
Physically, the flow is parallel to the plate and any fluid is convected downstream much more quickly than it is diffused across the streamlines. For boundary layer flow over a flat plate the pressure is constant. The flow represents a balance between viscous and inertial effects, with pressure playing no role.
Boundary conditions
BCs: u = v = 0 , y = 0 u U , y It can be argued that the velocity profile should be similar In addition, order of magnitude analysis leads to: u u 2u uu u ~ 2 , u +v = 2 , x x y y u y =g U
~
2
x
U
~ U
Similarity variables
Define the dimensionless similarity variable y U 2 = y~ , x and stream function
1
= ( xU )
Thus
1 2 1 U 2 u = = ( xU ) f ( ) = Uf ( ) y x 1 U 2 d v = x = 4 x ( f f ) where ( ) = d
Then the parabolic equation (9.9) becomes 2 f + ff = 0 with the boundary conditions f (0) = f (0) = 0 at = 0, f () 1 as
(9.14a) (9.14b)
Blasius solutions
u = f ( ) U from the numerical solution
1
x U 2 = 5 = , = 5 U x Ux 5 or Re x = = x Re x
HW: Derive (9.14&9.18) and solve using Matlab to get Table 9.1
Blasius solution
Figure 9.10
Blasius boundary layer profile: (a) boundary layer profile in dimensionless form using the similarity variable . (b) similar boundary layer profiles at different locations along the flat plate.
Blasius solution
displacement thickness: from (9.3) momentum thickness: from (9.4)
*
x
1.721 Re x
(9.16) (9.17)
0.664 = x Re x
(9.18)
One of the important aspects of boundary layer theory is the determination of the drag caused by shear forces on a body. Consider a uniform flow past a flat plate
Figure 9.11
Control volume used in the derivation of the momentum integral equation for boundary layer flow.
= D =
plate
w dA = b
plate
w dx or
2 2
D = U (U ) dA + u dA D = U bh b u 2 dy
(1) (2) 0
D = U bh b u du = b Uudy b u dy = b u (U u )dy
2 2 2 0 0 0 0
D = bU 2
u u (1 )dy = bU 2 , and U U 0
dD d = bU 2 dx dx
The increase in drag per length of the plate occurs at the expense of an increase of the momentum boundary layer thickness, which represents a decrease in the momentum of the fluid.
Q dD = wbdx dD d = b w w = U 2 momentum integral equation by von Karman dx dx
If we know the velocity distributions, we can obtain drag or shear stress. The accuracy of these results depends on how closely the shape of the assumed velocity profile approximates the actual profile.
Example 9.4
u= Uy
d w = U dx U w =
2
0 y u =U y >
u = U 0 =
u 1 U
u dy = U 0
1
u 1 U
dy
2 3 1
y y y y 2 dy y y dy 1 = = = 2 3 0 6 0 0
6 U U 2 d dx , d = = 6 dx U
2
2
6 12 x 2 = x U U
or = 3.46
x U Ux
=5
Ux
= 3.46
= 0.576
2
x U
w = 0.332U
3 2
3 d 2 = 0.289U w = U dx x
Figure 9.12
Typical approximate boundary layer profiles used in the momentum integral equation.
w =
u y
=
y =0
U dg dY
=
Y =0
U C 2
x 5 ) Re x
C1 = g (Y )[1 g (Y )]dY
0
2C2 / C1 Re x
(Blasius solution:
3 2
C2 =
w =
C1C2 U C2 = U 2
dg dY
Y =0
cf =
w
1 U 2 2 Df
= 2C1C2
l
2C1C2 = Ux Re x
(Blasius solution: c f =
0.664 ) Re x
CDf =
1 U 2bl 2
b w dx
0
1 U 2bl 2
8C1C2 Rel
, where Rel =
The analytical results are restricted to laminar boundary layer along a flat plate with zero pressure gradient. Transition to turbulent boundary layer occurs at
Re x ,cr = 2 105
3 106
Figure 9.9
Typical characteristics of boundary layer thickness and wall shear stress for laminar and turbulent boundary layers.
The structure of turbulent boundary layer flow is very complex, random, and irregular, with significant cross-stream mixing. Empirical power-law velocity profile is a reasonable approximation.
To begin with the momentum integral equaion: 2 d w = U dx 1 y 1 Y = ,Y < 1 u y 7 7 = =Y Assume U u = U ,Y > 1 and the experimentally determined formula:
w = 0.0225U U
2 1 4
Example 9.6
(1)
d w = U dx u u = 1 U U 0
2
u 1 U
1 1 7 7 7 = = 1 dY Y Y dY 72 0 1
(2)
= 0.370 U
x 5 , or
0.370 Re x
1 5
u = 1 U 0
*
u dy 1 = U 0
1 1 5
dY = 1 Y 0
1
dY = = 0.0463 8 U
= 0.036 = 72 U
<* <
w = 0.0225U 2 1 4 U 0.37 ( / U ) 5 x 5
l l 1 2
0.0288 U 2 Re x
1 5
A = bl
CDf =
Df
0.072
x x
x , w
2
Although Fig. 9.15 is similar with Moody diagram (pipe flow) of Fig. 8.23, the mechanisms are quite different. For fully developed pipe flow, fluid inertia remains constant and the flow is balanced between pressure forces and viscous forces. For flat plate boundary layer flow, pressure remains constant and the flow is balanced between inertia effects and viscous forces.
Figure 9.15
Friction drag coefficient for a flat plate parallel to the upstream flow.
Example 9.7
Viscous flow
Separated flow
No matter how small the viscosity, provided it is not zero, there will be a boundary layer that separates from the surface, giving a drag that is, for the most part, independent of the value of .
U fs 2
2
= constant
dU fs dp = U fs dx dx
z
(9.34)
This equation represents a balance between viscous forces ( w ), pressure forces( dp = U dU fs ), and the fluid fs dx dx momentum( ). Eq. 9.35 can be used to provide information about the boundary layer thickness, wall shear stress, etc,
(b)
U 1 = + ( vU vu ) uU u 2 + (U u ) x y y x
U 1 dy = u (U u )dy + x 0 x y
(U u )dy +
0
( vU vu )dy y 0
v=0 at y=0,
1 U = + dy u U u dy ( ) y x x 0 0
U = u (U u )dy + x 0 x
(U u )dy
0
(U u )dy
0
u = U 2 x 0 U =
u 1 U
U u + 1 dy U x U 0
dy
U U 2 + U * x x
(9.35)
9.3 Drag
z
Any object moving through a fluid will experience a drag D -- a net force in the direction of flow due to pressure (pressure drag) and shear stress (friction drag) on the surface of the object.
Drag coefficient: D CD = 1 = ( shape, Re, Ma, Fr, / l ) 2 2 U A
These are determined experimentally, and very few can be obtained analytically.
Drag due to the shear stress w , on the object. For large Re, the friction drag is generally smaller than pressure drag. However, for highly streamlined bodies or for low Reynolds number flow, most of the drag may be due to friction drag. Drag on a plate of width b and length l
Friction Drag
For laminar flow, CDf is independent of For turbulent flow, CDf is function of CDf
Drag due to pressure on the object. Pressure drag also called form drag because of its strong dependency on the shape or form of the object.
D p = p cos dA C p = p p0 : pressure coefficient 1 U 2 2 p cos dA C p cos dA Dp p0 : reference pressure = = = 1 1 A U 2 A U 2 A 2 2
CDp
1 p p0 U 2 ( dynamic pressure ) 2 p p0 : pressure coefficient D p = p cos dA C p = 2 U / 2 1 1 A 2 U A U 2 A 2 2 Therefore, C p is independent of Reynolds number, CDp is also independent of Reynolds number ( Re 1) CDp = Dp p cos dA C = =
p
cos dA
( viscous stress )
CDp
Dp 1 U 2 A 2
1 U 2 2
Comparisons: 1 Re For large Reynolds number f constant ( pipe flow ) For laminar pipe flow f
Figure 9.20
Two objects of considerably different size that have the same drag force: (a) circular cylinder CD = 1.2; (b) streamlined strut CD = 0.12.
Shape Dependence
Figure 9.19
Drag coefficient for an ellipse with the characteristic area either the frontal area, A = bD, or the planform area, A = bl (Ref. 5).
Note: For Re<1, streamlining increases the drag due to an increase in the area on which shear force act.
to determine U FB = H 2O = H 2O
D3 ,
D3 ,
( For
Re < 1) = 3 H 2OUD
= g
SG ( U=
H 2O
H 2O gD 2
18
= 6.32 103 m m
3
s m2
, H 2O = 1.12 103 N S
UD = 0.564
( Re < 1)
Re < 1 , no separation
Re 5 104
Re 4 105
Note: In a portion of the range 105<Re<106, the actual drag (not just CD) decreases with increasing speed.
V9.9 Oscillating sign V9.10 Flow past a flat plate V9.11 Flow past an ellipse
Compressibility Effects
When the compressibility effects become important CD = (Re, Ma)
Notes: 1. Compressibility effect is negligible for Ma<0.5. 2. CD increases dramatically near Ma=1, due to the existence of shock wave.
Surface roughness influences drag when the boundary layer is turbulent, because it protrudes through the laminar sublayer and alters the wall shear stress. In addition, surface roughness can alter the transitional critical Re and change the net drag.
D until transition to turbulence occurs and the wake region becomes considerably narrower so that the pressure drag drops. (Fig. 9.25)
CD
Surface Roughness
A well-hit golf ball has Re of O(105 ), and the dimpled golf ball has a critical Reynolds number 4 104 dimples reduce CD Table tennis Reynolds number is less than 4 104 no need of dimples
CD ,rough CD ,smooth
Approximate drag calculations for a complex body by treating it as composite collection of its various parts. e.g., drag on an airplane or an automobile. The contributions of the drag due to various portions of car (i.e., front end, windshield, roof, rear end, etc.) have been determined. As a result it is possible to predict the aerodynamic drag on cars of a wide variety ouf body styles (Fig. 9.27).
Froude no. free surface present is relatively unimportant Ma is important for Ma > 0.8 Re effect is not great The most important parameter that affects the lift coefficient is the shape of the object.
Common lift-generating devices (airfoils, fans,) operate at large Re. Most of the lift comes from the surface pressure distribution. For Re<1, viscous effect and pressure are equally important to the lift (for minute insects and the swimming of microscopic organisms).
Figure 9.31
Pressure distribution on the surface of an automobile.
Airfoil
z
For airfoils, the characteristic area A is the planform area in the definition of both CLand CD. For a rectangular planform wing, A=bc, where c is the chord length, b is the length of the airfoil. Typical CL ~O(1), i.e., L~(U2/2)A, Wright Flyer: 1.5 lb / ft 2 and the wing loading L/A~(U2)/2:
Boeing 747: 150 lb / ft 2
Large A : long wing, soaring airplane, albatross, etc. Small A : short wing, highly maneuverable fighter, falcon
Lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and aspect ratio
Figure 9.33
Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and the aspect ratio of the airfoil: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.
Although viscous effects contributes little to the direct generation of lift, viscosity-induced boundary layer separation can occur when is too large to lead to stall.
Ex. 9.15
Figure 9.35
Typical lift and drag alterations possible with the use of various types of flap designs (Ref. 21).
9.4.2 Circulation
2-D symmetric air foil Kutta conditionThe flow over
both the topside and the underside join up at the trailing edge and leave the airfoil travelling parallel to one another.
Circulation
Flow past finite length wing
Figure 9.37 (p. 546)
Flow past a finite length wing: (a) the horseshoe vortex system produced by the bound vortex and the trailing vortices: (b) the leakage of air around the wing tips produces the trailing vortices.
Circulation
Flow past a circular cylinder
z
A rotating cylinder in a stationary real fluid can produce circulation and generate a liftMagnus effect EXAMPLE 9.16 Lift on a rotating table tennis ball
Figure 9.38
Inviscid flow past a circular cylinder: (a) uniform upstream flow without circulation. (b) free vortex at the center of the cylinder, (c) combination of free vortex and uniform flow past a circular cylinder giving nonsymmetric flow and a lift.