Scribd
Upload
121 views1 page

WRL SEF Audit

This document contains a summary audit of a school's work-related learning (WRL) program. It evaluates the WRL program across several areas on a scale of 1 to 4, including WRL leadership, integration with the curriculum, monitoring procedures, staff understanding, resources, reflection of learning frameworks, enterprise skills, financial capability, economic understanding, student recording of progress, assessment, and community partnerships. The audit recommends priorities for development, such as improving integration between WRL and the curriculum. It was supported by an auditor named KA Murphy.

Uploaded by

Kevin Murphy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
121 views1 page

WRL SEF Audit

This document contains a summary audit of a school's work-related learning (WRL) program. It evaluates the WRL program across several areas on a scale of 1 to 4, including WRL leadership, integration with the curriculum, monitoring procedures, staff understanding, resources, reflection of learning frameworks, enterprise skills, financial capability, economic understanding, student recording of progress, assessment, and community partnerships. The audit recommends priorities for development, such as improving integration between WRL and the curriculum. It was supported by an auditor named KA Murphy.

Uploaded by

Kevin Murphy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Summary document

Institution Date

SEF Audit tool - Work Related Learning (WRL) and Enterprise


Leadership and Management 1 2 3 4
How effective is WRL leadership across the whole school in bringing
about co-ordination between WRL and the rest of the curriculum?

Is the WRL programme effectively integrated with the rest of the


curriculum?

Do the procedures for monitoring WRL lead to continuous


improvement in the quality of provision?

How clear is staff understanding as to what WRL is and how it


contributes to pupil achievement?

Are resources appropriate to deliver all aspects of the WRL and IAG
policy e.g. subject leader, tutors, remitted time, resource area, ICT,
support and administrative staff, budget etc.
Teaching and Learning 1 2 3 4
Does the WRL programme reflect the 9 elements of the QCA WRL
framework and cater for the interests, aptitudes and particular needs
of all students?
Statutory Curricular Relevance 1 2 3 4
How effective are the opportunities in the WRL programme to
display enterprise skills in relation to decision making.

How effective are the opportunities in the WRL programme to


display financial capability.

How effective are the opportunities in the WRL programme to


display economic understanding

Recording and Assessment 1 2 3 4


How well do students record their progress from the various aspects
of the WRL programme?

How effective is the school in assessing, recording and planning


future learning in WRL?

Community Partnership 1 2 3 4
How effective are partnerships with employers and other link
agencies?
Make an assessment of the overall grade you would award this section.
Section 4 Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Personal development and well-
being

On the basis of your evaluation, what are your key priorities for development?

Audit supported by KA Murphy

You might also like