Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 633 views

    Republic v. Mercadera Digest

    Uploaded by

    viva_33
    1) Merlyn Mercadera filed a petition before the Regional Trial Court to correct her first name from "Marilyn" to "Merlyn" as appearing on her birth certificate, as she had always used "Merlyn" since childhood. 2) The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision granting the correction, finding it was simply rectifying a misspelling under Rule 108 rather than a change of name under Rule 103. 3) The Supreme Court affirmed, finding the correction from "MARILYN" to "MERLYN" did not alter Mercadera's civil status or legal capacity, but simply removed a clerical error as allowed under Rule 108.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Republic v. Mercadera Digest

    Uploaded by

    viva_33
    633 views4 pages
    1) Merlyn Mercadera filed a petition before the Regional Trial Court to correct her first name from "Marilyn" to "Merlyn" as appearing on her birth certificate, as she had always used "Merlyn" since childhood. 2) The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision granting the correction, finding it was simply rectifying a misspelling under Rule 108 rather than a change of name under Rule 103. 3) The Supreme Court affirmed, finding the correction from "MARILYN" to "MERLYN" did not alter Mercadera's civil status or legal capacity, but simply removed a clerical error as allowed under Rule 108.

    Original Description:

    SPECPRO - Change of name

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Merlyn Mercadera filed a petition before the Regional Trial Court to correct her first name from "Marilyn" to "Merlyn" as appearing on her birth certificate, as she had always used "Merlyn" since childhood. 2) The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision granting the correction, finding it was simply rectifying a misspelling under Rule 108 rather than a change of name under Rule 103. 3) The Supreme Court affirmed, finding the correction from "MARILYN" to "MERLYN" did not alter Mercadera's civil status or legal capacity, but simply removed a clerical error as allowed under Rule 108.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    633 views4 pages

    Republic v. Mercadera Digest

    Uploaded by

    viva_33
    1) Merlyn Mercadera filed a petition before the Regional Trial Court to correct her first name from "Marilyn" to "Merlyn" as appearing on her birth certificate, as she had always used "Merlyn" since childhood. 2) The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision granting the correction, finding it was simply rectifying a misspelling under Rule 108 rather than a change of name under Rule 103. 3) The Supreme Court affirmed, finding the correction from "MARILYN" to "MERLYN" did not alter Mercadera's civil status or legal capacity, but simply removed a clerical error as allowed under Rule 108.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. MERLYN MERCADERA G.R. No.

    186027, December 8, 2010 FACTS: On June 6, 2005, Merlyn Mercadera (Mercadera), represented by her sister and duly constituted Attorney-in-Fact, Evelyn M. Oga (Oga), sought the correction of her given name as it appeared in her Certificate of Live Birth from Marilyn L. Mercadera to Merlyn L. Mercadera before the Office of the Local Civil Registrar of Dipolog City pursuant to Republic Act No. 9048. Under R.A. No. 9048, the city or municipal civil registrar or consul general is now authorized to effect the change of first name or nickname and the correction of clerical or typographical errors in civil registry entries. The Office of the Local Civil Registrar of Dipolog City, however, refused to effect the correction unless a court order was obtained "because the Civil Registrar therein is not yet equipped with a permanent appointment before he can validly act on petitions for corrections filed before their office as mandated by R.A. No. 9048." Mercadera then filed a Petition For Correction of Some Entries as Appearing in the Certificate of Live Birth under Rule 108 before the Regional Trial Court of Dipolog City (RTC). Upon receipt of the petition for correction of entry, the RTC issued an order, dated June 10, 2005, for the hearing of said petition. The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) deputized the Office of the City Prosecutor to assist in the case. Without any objection from the City Prosecutor, the testimony of Oga and several photocopies of documents were formally offered and marked as evidence to prove that Mercadera never used the name "Marilyn" in any of her public or private transactions. In its September 28, 2005 Decision, the RTC granted the petition and ruled that the documentary evidence presented by Mercadera sufficiently supported the circumstances alleged in her petition.

    Considering that she had used "Merlyn" as her given name since childhood until she discovered the discrepancy in her Certificate of Live Birth, the RTC was convinced that the correction was justified. The OSG timely appealed praying for the reversal and setting aside of the RTC decision. For the OSG, the correction in the spelling of Mercaderas given name "is in truth a material correction as it would modify or increase substantive rights", which would have been proper had she filed a petition under Rule 103 and proved any of the grounds therefor. The CA was not persuaded. In its December 9, 2008 Decision, the appellate court affirmed the questioned RTC order. On March 6, 2009, the OSG filed the present petition. On behalf of Mercadera, the Public Attorneys Office (PAO) filed its Comment on July 3, 2009. ISSUES: WHETHER OR NOT THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED ON A QUESTION OF LAW IN GRANTING THE CHANGE IN RESPONDENTS NAME UNDER RULE 103. HELD: Rule 103 procedurally governs judicial petitions for change of given name or surname, or both, pursuant to Article 376 of the Civil Code. This rule provides the procedure for an independent special proceeding in court to establish the status of a person involving his relations with others, that is, his legal position in, or with regard to, the rest of the community. Essentially, a change of name does not define or effect a change of ones existing family relations or in the rights and duties flowing therefrom. It does not alter ones legal capacity or civil status. Rule 108, on the other hand, implements judicial proceedings for the correction or cancellation of entries in the civil registry pursuant to

    Article 412 of the Civil Code. Entries in the civil register refer to "acts, events and judicial decrees concerning the civil status of persons," also as enumerated in Article 408 of the same law. In the case at bench, the OSG posits that the conversion from "MARILYN" to "MERLYN" is not a correction of an innocuous error but a material correction tantamount to a change of name which entails a modification or increase in substantive rights. For the OSG, this is a substantial error that requires compliance with the procedure under Rule 103, and not Rule 108. A change of ones name under Rule 103 can be granted, only on grounds provided by law, there must be a proper and compelling reason for the change and proof that the person requesting will be prejudiced by the use of his official name. In petitions for correction, only clerical, spelling, typographical and other innocuous errors in the civil registry may be raised. Considering that the enumeration in Section 2, Rule 108 also includes "changes of name," the correction of a patently misspelled name is covered by Rule 108. Suffice it to say, not all alterations allowed in ones name are confined under Rule 103. Corrections for clerical errors may be set right under Rule 108. Thus, the petition filed by Mercadera before the RTC correctly falls under Rule 108 as it simply sought a correction of a misspelled given name. To correct simply means "to make or set aright; to remove the faults or error from." To change means "to replace something with something else of the same kind or with something that serves as a substitute." From the allegations in her petition, Mercadera clearly prayed for the lower court "to remove the faults or error" from her registered given name "MARILYN," and "to make or set aright" the same to conform to the one she grew up to, "MERLYN." The CA did not allow Mercadera the change of her name. What it did allow was the correction of her misspelled given name which she had been using ever since she could remember.

    Mercadera complied with the requirement for an adversarial proceeding before the lower court. The publication and posting of the notice of hearing in a newspaper of general circulation and the notices sent to the OSG and the Local Civil Registry are sufficient indicia of an adverse proceeding. Considering that the OSG did not oppose the petition and the motion to present its evidence ex parte when it had the opportunity to do so, it cannot now complain that the proceedings in the lower court were procedurally defective. Wherefore, the December 9, 2008 Decision of the Court of Appeals is AFFIRMED.

    You might also like