Scribd
Upload
1K views9 pages

Paradox of Thrift

The paradox of thrift states that if everyone in an economy tries to increase their savings, it could actually decrease total income. This is because less spending in the economy leads to less demand for goods and services, which causes companies to produce less and lay off more workers. With fewer people earning incomes, savings and demand continue to fall, creating a negative feedback loop for the economy. While increased individual savings is rational, if everyone does it, the reduction in aggregate demand can outweigh the rise in savings.

Uploaded by

Varun Garg
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views9 pages

Paradox of Thrift

The paradox of thrift states that if everyone in an economy tries to increase their savings, it could actually decrease total income. This is because less spending in the economy leads to less demand for goods and services, which causes companies to produce less and lay off more workers. With fewer people earning incomes, savings and demand continue to fall, creating a negative feedback loop for the economy. While increased individual savings is rational, if everyone does it, the reduction in aggregate demand can outweigh the rise in savings.

Uploaded by

Varun Garg
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

The Paradox of Thrift

Economic concept that if everyone tries to save an

increasingly larger portion of his or her income, they would become poorer instead of richer. This is because the economy will slow down from reduction in demand and the very same people would lose their jobs. This theory, however, applies mainly to Keynesian economics where increased savings represent a diminishing circular flow of income.

Many people believe that higher savings lead to higher income.


In the present model, we get a result that is

contrary to this belief. In other words, equilibrium income falls when people want to save more. Idea: the attempt to achieve higher savings may reduce equilibrium income

This is an example of the fallacy of composition Thriftiness, while a virtue for the individual, is

disastrous for an economy Given I = I Given S = S + sY OR S = -C + (1-c)Y Now, suppose S Will Ye increase as well?

A rise in thriftiness causes a decrease in national income but no increase in realised saving.

S=S +sY S= S+ sY Excess Supply

I=I

Ye

If a rise in saving leads to a reduction in interest rate and hence an increase in investment (Think of the loanable fund market), national income may not decrease Ye will increase if I increase more than S Ye will remain the same if I increase as much as S Ye will decrease if I increase less than S

I > S

S=S +sY S= S+ sY I=I I=I

Ye

I = S

S=S +sY S= S+ sY I=I I=I

Ye

=Ye

I < S

The reduction in Ye is less than the case when I does not increase

S=S +sY S= S+ sY I=I I=I

Ye What about the case if I is an induced function of Y?


8

S,I

S1 S0 I

Fig 9.7

Savings (in pesos)

Y1

Y0

Income (in pesos)

The Paradox of Thrift

You might also like