Non Parametric Test-1
Non Parametric Test-1
(ii)
Non-parametric tests
ADVANTAGES OF NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS If the sample size is small there is no alternative If the data is nominal or ordinal These tests are much easier to apply
i) Discard information by converting to ranks ii) Parametric tests are more powerful iii) Tables of critical values may not be easily available. iv) It is merely for testing of hypothesis and no confidence limits could be calculated.
Non-parametric tests
Note: When valid, use parametric Commonly used Wilcoxon signed-rank test Wilcoxon rank-sum test Spearman rank correlation Chi square etc. Useful for non-normal data If possible use some transformation If normalization not possible Note: CI interval -difficult/impossible
To
EXAMPLE
Hours of sleep Patient Drug Placebo
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6.1
7.0 8.2 7.6 6.5 8.4 6.9 6.7 7.4 5.8
5.2
7.9 3.9 4.7 5.3 5.4 4.2 6.1 3.8 6.3
Null Hypothesis: Hours of sleep are the same using placebo & the drug
STEP 1
Exclude any differences which are zero Ignore their signs Put the rest of differences in ascending order Assign them ranks
STEP 2
STEP 3
If there is no difference between drug (T+) and placebo (T-), then T+ & T- would be similar If there is a difference one sum would be much smaller and the other much larger than expected The larger sum is denoted as T T = larger of T+ and T-
STEP 4
Compare the value obtained with the critical values (5%, 2% and 1% ) in table N is the number of differences that were ranked (not the total number of differences)
Hours of sleep
Patient
Drug
Placebo
Difference
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3.5* 3.5* 10 7 5 8 6
8
9 10
6.7
7.4 5.8
6.1
3.8 6.3
0.6
3.6 -0.5
2
9 1
3rd & 4th ranks are tied hence averaged; T= larger of T+ (50.5) and T- (4.5) Here, calculated value of T= 50.5; tabulated value of T= 47 (at 5%) significant at 5% level indicating that the drug (hypnotic) is more effective than placebo
Birth wt (Kg) Birth wt (Kg) 3.99 3.18 3.79 2.84 3.60* 2.90 3.73 3.27 3.21 3.85 3.60* 3.52 4.08 3.23 3.61 2.76 3.83 3.60* 3.31 3.75 4.13 3.59 3.26 3.63 3.54 2.38 3.51 2.34 2.71 Null Hypothesis: Mean birth weight is same between non-smokers & smokers
Non-smokers (n=15)
Step 1
Step 2
Add up the ranks in the group with smaller sample size If the two groups are of the same size either one may be picked
Step 3
Compare this sum with the critical ranges given in table Look up the rows corresponding to the sample sizes of the two groups A range will be shown for the 5% significance level
Birth wt (Kg) 3.99 3.79 3.60* 3.73 3.21 3.60* 4.08 3.61 3.83 3.31 4.13 3.26 3.54 3.51 2.71
Non-smokers (n=15)
Rank 27 24 18 22 8 18 28 20 25 12 29 10 15 13 3
Birth wt (Kg) 3.18 2.84 2.90 3.27 3.85 3.52 3.23 2.76 3.60* 3.75 3.59 3.63 2.38 2.34
Sum=272
Sum=163
* 17, 18 & 19are tied hence the ranks are averaged Hence caculated value of T = 163; tabulated value of T (14,15) = 151 Mean birth weights are not same for non-smokers & smokers they are significantly different
Examples to know the correlation between honesty and wisdom of the boys of a class.
It can also be used to find the degree of agreement between the judgements of two examiners or two judges.
R (Rank correlation coefficient) = D = Difference between the ranks of two items N = The number of observations. Note: -1 R 1.
Computation
i. Give ranks to the values of items. Generally the item with the highest value is ranked 1 and then the others are given ranks 2, 3, 4, .... ii. according to their values in the decreasing order. Find the difference D = R1 - R2 Note that D = 0 (always) iii. iv. Calculate D2 and then find D2 Apply the formula. where R1 = Rank of x and R2 = Rank of y
Student No.
Rank in Maths
Rank in Stats
R1 - R2 D
(R1 - R2 )2 D2
(R1)
(R2)
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N = 10
1 3 7
5 4 6 2 10 9 8
3 1 4
5 6 9 7 8 10 2
-2 2 3
0 -2 -3 -5 2 -1 6
4 4 9
0 4 9 25 4 1 36
D=0
D2 = 96