02 Statistical Process Control
02 Statistical Process Control
Douglas M. Stewart, Ph.D. The Anderson Schools of Management The University of New Mexico
Inspection/Testing Points
Receiving inspection In-process inspection Final inspection
Receiving Inspection
Spot check procedures 100 percent inspection Acceptance sampling
Acceptance Sampling
Lot received for inspection Sample selected and analyzed Results compared with acceptance criteria Accept the lot Send to production or to customer Reject the lot Decide on disposition 7
Arguments against:
Does not make sense for stable processes Only detects poor quality; does not help to prevent it Is non-value-added Does not help suppliers improve
In-Process Inspection
What to inspect?
Key quality characteristics that are related to cost or quality (customer requirements)
Where to inspect?
Key processes, especially high-cost and value-added
Economic Model
C1 = cost of inspection and removal of nonconforming item C2 = cost of repair p = true fraction nonconforming Breakeven Analysis: p*C2 = C1 If p > C1 / C2 , use 100% inspection If p < C1 / C2 , do nothing
10
Human Factors in Inspection complexity defect rate repeated inspections inspection rate
Inspection should never be a means of assuring quality. The purpose of inspection should be to gather information to understand and improve the processes that produce products and services.
12
Examples of Gauges
Accuracy - closeness of agreement between an observed value and a standard Precision - closeness of agreement between randomly selected individual measurements
R ij = max ( M ijk ) min ( M ijk ) range for each part for each operator
k k
Use number trials (r) for n in table. Check Repeatability or Equipment Variation EV = K1 R Reproducibility or operator (appraisal) variation EV 2 AV = ( K 2 xD ) nr K 2 is a constant tied to # of operators Repeatability and Reproducibility
2
R&R =
( EV ) 2 + ( AV ) 2
Results are in actual units measured. Customary to express as percentages. Under 10% - Acceptable 10 - 30% - ? based on importance and repair cost Over 30% - Unacceptable
R&R Constants
Number of Trials K1 Number of Operators K2 2 3 4 5
R&R Evaluation
Under 10% error - OK 10-30% error - may be OK over 30% error - unacceptable
R&R Example
R&R Study is to be conducted on a gauge being used to measure the thickness of a gasket having specification of 0.50 to 1.00 mm. We have three operators, each taking measurement on 10 parts in 2 separate trials.
x1 = 0.830 x2 = 0.774 x3 = 0.829
Calibration
Calibration - comparing a measurement device or system to one having a known relationship to national standards Traceability to national standards maintained by NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology
24
Common Causes
Special Causes
Attribute data
For defectives (p-chart, np-chart) For defects (c-chart, u-chart)
28
2. Collect Data
Record data Calculate appropriate statistics Plot statistics on chart
Next Steps
3. Determine trial control limits
Center line (process average) Compute UCL, LCL
Cycles
Trend
Final Steps
5. Use as a problem-solving tool
Continue to collect and plot data Take corrective action when necessary
Process Capability
Capability Indices
UTL LTL 6 if C p 1 is defined as capable (1.5 more often the minimum) Cp = Example : Part specification is 10.75mm .25mm = 0.0868mm
C pk = C p (1 K ) where K =
C pm = 1+
C pm = 1+
Cp
( T )
2
0.960
T is the Target
(10.7171 10.75)
0.8682
= 0.8977
Out of Control
44
Excel Template
attribute
defect
64
65
Pre-Control
LTL Red Zone UTL Red Zone
Green Zone
nominal value
Yellow Zones
67