Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

Crosstabs Level - Spirutuality2 Risky - Sexual - Behaviour1

The document contains results from three cross-tabulation analyses examining relationships between levels of spirituality, media consumption, parental monitoring, and risky sexual behavior in a sample of 195 individuals. All three analyses found statistically significant associations, with higher levels of spirituality and parental monitoring associated with lower rates of risky sexual behavior, and higher media consumption associated with higher rates of risky sexual behavior.

Uploaded by

pavlov2
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

Crosstabs Level - Spirutuality2 Risky - Sexual - Behaviour1

The document contains results from three cross-tabulation analyses examining relationships between levels of spirituality, media consumption, parental monitoring, and risky sexual behavior in a sample of 195 individuals. All three analyses found statistically significant associations, with higher levels of spirituality and parental monitoring associated with lower rates of risky sexual behavior, and higher media consumption associated with higher rates of risky sexual behavior.

Uploaded by

pavlov2
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Crosstabs Level_Spirutuality2 * Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1

Crosstab
Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1 LOW HIGH Level_Spirutuality2 LOW MEDIUM HIGH Total Count % within Level_Spirutuality2 Count % within Level_Spirutuality2 Count % within Level_Spirutuality2 Count % within Level_Spirutuality2 Total

21 51.2% 10 19.6% 52 50.5% 83 42.6%

20 48.8% 41 80.4% 51 49.5% 112 57.4%

41 100.0% 51 100.0% 103 100.0% 195 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

14.894

2 2 1

.001 .000 .404

15.925 .696 195

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.45.

Level_Media_consumption2 * Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1
Crosstab
Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1 LOW HIGH Level_Media_consumption2 LOW MEDIUM HIGH Total Count % within Level_Media_consumption2 Count % within Level_Media_consumption2 Count % within Level_Media_consumption2 Count % within Level_Media_consumption2 Total

51 52.0% 24 53.3% 8 15.4% 83 42.6%

47 48.0% 21 46.7% 44 84.6% 112 57.4%

98 100.0% 45 100.0% 52 100.0% 195 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

21.448

2 2 1

.000 .000 .000

23.472 16.042 195

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.15.

Parental_Monitoring2 * Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1

Crosstab
Risky_Sexual_Behaviour1 LOW HIGH Parental_Monitoring2 LOW MEDIUM HIGH Total Count % within Parental_Monitoring2 Count % within Parental_Monitoring2 Count % within Parental_Monitoring2 Count % within Parental_Monitoring2 Total

21 38.2% 18 27.3% 44 59.5% 83 42.6%

34 61.8% 48 72.7% 30 40.5% 112 57.4%

55 100.0% 66 100.0% 74 100.0% 195 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

15.385

2 2 1

.000 .000 .008

15.587 7.118 195

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.41.

You might also like